MOTION FOR A RESOLUTIONon plans and actions to accelerate a transition to innovation without the use of animals in research, regulatory testing and education
8.9.2021-()
pursuant to Rule 132(2) of the Rules of Procedure
Hilde Vautmans
on behalf of the Renew Group
See also joint motion for a resolutionRC-B9-0425/2021
9‑0426/2021
European Ϸվ resolution on plans and actions to accelerate a transition to innovation without the use of animals in research, regulatory testing and education
()
Ϸվ,
–having regard to Articles 13 and 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
–having regard to Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Ϸվ and of the Council of 22September2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes[1],
–having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Ϸվ and of the Council of 30November2009 on cosmetic products[2],
–having regard to its resolution of 3 May2018 on a global ban to end animal testing for cosmetics[3],
–having regard to Rule 132(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
A.whereas Directive 2010/63/EU sets out the ultimate goal of fully replacing ‘procedures on live animals [...] as soon as it is scientifically possible to do so’ and underlines that the use of animals for such purposes should only be considered where non-animal methods are unavailable;
B.whereas the EU could play a leading role in the phasing out of animals used in science by increasing its efforts and developing viable alternatives;
C.whereas although Directive 2010/63/EU obliges the Member States and the Commission to be fully transparent on the use of animals in science, there is still a lack of transparency;
D.whereas in 2017, the use of animals for scientific purposes was reported 9.58 million times; whereas the main purpose was research (69%), followed by regulatory use to satisfy legislative requirements (23%) and routine production (5%); whereas among the tests carried out for regulatory purposes, the majority involved medical products for humans (61%), followed by veterinary medicinal products (15%) and industrial chemicals (11%)[4];
E.whereas the formal encouragement of non-animal methods is unique to the EU; whereas, however, there are bureaucratic hurdles to the acceptance of these methods, their use is not properly enforced and funding for their development remains inadequate;
F.whereas the EU’s landmark ban on animal testing for cosmetics has had a positive impact on animal welfare in the EU and has successfully shown that phasing out the use of animal testing is possible without jeopardising the development of the cosmetics sector;
G.whereas the replacement of animal tests by advanced non-animal methods will be crucial in achieving the Commission’s ambitious health and environmental goals set out in the NextGenerationEU recovery plan and the European Green Deal;
1.Stresses that Directive 2010/63/EU is among the strictest legislation in the world, yet the number of animals being used in science remains high, and in some Member States is increasing again; calls, in this regard, for the Commission to evaluate Directive 2010/63/EU and make specific recommendations to the Member States on its implementation and enforcement in practice;
2.Points out that any new initiatives and legislation, such as the chemicals strategy for sustainability, must fully respect the goal of Directive 2010/63/EU to phase out, where possible, the use of animals for scientific purposes; is of the opinion that the use of grouping of substances, read-across from similar chemicals and the extension of the generic risk assessment are essential tools to reduce animal testing;
3.Calls on the Commission to establish an action plan that would help achieve the goal outlined in Directive 2010/63/EU and that would ultimately phase out animal-based methods wherever alternative methods can be developed and accelerate the transition towards animal-free methods; highlights that such an action plan should focus on replacing animal experiments where possible, reducing the number of animals used and refining experiments to minimise the impact on animals; stresses that a clear and ambitious timeline and list of milestones should be set out to incentivise progress;
4.Stresses that although phasing out the use of animals for scientific purposes should be the only and ultimate goal, it must be acknowledged that non-animal methods are not yet available in all scientific research areas; underlines that there are cases where animal experiments are still needed to gain scientific insights in the long search for an effective remedy for certain diseases; stresses that because of the unavailability of non-animal methods, such experiments must take place in optimal conditions which minimise pain, distress and suffering and respect the welfare of the animals as much as possible;
5.Encourages the private sector to play an active part in this action plan, in particular companies willing to switch to non-animal models and start-ups that develop and perfect these models; believes that government bodies must take on a coordinating role and enter into a positive and constructive dialogue with the sector, but that solutions must ultimately grow bottom-up; calls out for a better coordinated, cross-sectoral and EU-wide approach across all Member States and all EU agencies;
6.Sets out as a priority for the scientific community the development of innovative non-animal testing methods to replace animal testing, and, where alternatives are non-existent, the refinement of animal methods in order to minimise stress on animals; points out the need for knowledge sharing and international cooperation on this subject; sees the potential of promoting and rewarding best practices;
7.Insists that new alternative animal testing methods need to be better streamlined and that continuous training of scientists and researchers is key in that respect; calls on the Commission and the Member States to treat the training of scientists and researchers in the use of new alternative methods to animal testing as a priority; highlights the need for adequate training on the use of advanced non-animal models to be included in all relevant education courses;
8.Highlights the need for increased and targeted funding under Horizon Europe for animal-free research methods and new, advanced non-animal models; states that methods of testing and the use of non-animal methods should be taken into account through preferential funding in all EU research and innovation initiatives, as these alternative methods bring additional costs and investments;
9.Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.
- [1] OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 33.
- [2] OJ L 342, 22.12.2009, p. 59.
- [3] OJ C 41, 6.2.2020, p. 45.
- [4] 2019 report from the Commission to the European Ϸվ and the Council of 5 February 2020 on the statistics on the use of animals for scientific purposes in the Member States of the European Union in 2015-2017 ().