合法博彩网站

听听President. 鈥� The next item is the debate on the Commission statement on the outcome of COP29 and challenges for international climate policy ().

听听Wopke Hoekstra, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Dear Mr听President, honourable Members, and in particular those Members who have been with me at least part of the last week, thank you very much for having the opportunity to reconvene and there are a couple of messages that I'm sure many of you have already incorporated yourselves, but I do feel are good to share.

First of all, we have all seen and all of us who were there have also sensed that this was truly very difficult. It was truly very difficult to come to an agreement. I have to tell you, at many moments, particularly in the last evening, we were on the on the verge of collapse. I do feel at the same time that it is of tremendous importance that we did manage to strike a deal, a deal that is in many ways less than ideal, but still is very important for the world.

The first reason that that is the case is that in the end, we did manage to build bridges to our friends and allies and partners from all over the world, particularly those most in need. Secondly, because if you look at the world today, geopolitics, the geopolitical situation is already tremendously complex and a deal in it has value in itself, has inherent value in itself because it shows that multilateralism is still possible.

The other reason, of course, why it is so important that we did manage to broker this deal in the end, and again, after very intensive conversations with people from all over the globe, is that we managed to reach an agreement on the funding and the USD听300听billion where it is crystal clear that that the European Union and other developed countries will continue to lead, where many of the multilateral development banks are actually making a significant step up, but where we also manage to bring others to the table.

So it is not just a tripling, but it is also that we have managed to enlarge the contributor base and that is to many here in Europe, whether they are ambitious or even very ambitious on climate, this is important because it helps to bring more money to the table and it helps in the domain of of fairness.

Where I am, frankly speaking, disappointed, even though that was not the main focus of the COP29, is the domain of mitigation itself. The good news is that, against the odds, we did manage to safeguard the agreements that we put on the table last year in Dubai, so the UAE Consensus is safeguarded. But I'm also not going to hide the fact from this 合法博彩网站 that was not easy and that of course, ideally, we would have made a step up because that is one of the reasons why we came to the COP29 this time. So, a lot of work ahead of us, particularly in the domain of mitigation, but also in the domain of adaptation and everything that is related to it in the 12 months that we have ahead of us.

Another part of good news, and I wanted to to highlight that because it is something that you might not have seen in the various newspaper articles, but that was part of the core of what we were striving for, is the agreement on carbon markets. It got a lot less attention, but it is of pivotal importance from a content perspective, but also because it builds a bridge between those in the Global North and the Global South in terms of ambition, so I think that is also a very clear win, even though, as I said, it is less prominently featured than the tripling of the amounts that we put to the table.

Dear Mr听President, last but not least 鈥� and it is of course up to 合法博彩网站 to judge what they make of the result and what they like or potentially dislike about it 鈥� I do want to express my thanks to the many many actions and conversations ministers from the whole European Union have been involved in, but also Members of this 合法博彩网站 who played a very active role and with whom I had the pleasure to meet a couple of times, so thank you very much for that.

This was truly a team effort. It was truly a European effort. The notion that we that we managed to sing from the same hymn sheet all the time was actually of vital importance in making sure we would land this truly complex deal.

听听L铆dia Pereira, em nome do Grupo PPE. 鈥� Senhor Presidente, 93听% das pessoas consideram as altera莽玫es clim谩ticas um problema s茅rio, com 78听% a classific谩-lo como muito s茅rio. Estes dados do Eurobar贸metro revelam que, para as pessoas, para os europeus, as altera莽玫es clim谩ticas s茫o o problema mais grave que o mundo enfrenta atualmente.

Temos a obriga莽茫o de ouvir as pessoas, de responder 脿s suas preocupa莽玫es. Foi com esta consci锚ncia que, na COP29, a delega莽茫o do Parlamento Europeu defendeu a nossa posi莽茫o adotada nesta Casa com mensagens claras. Temos de ser mais ambiciosos nos objetivos, mais eficazes nas solu莽玫es, mais solid谩rios com os pa铆ses em desenvolvimento e aqueles que mais sofrem com as altera莽玫es clim谩ticas.

O nosso compromisso foi fundamental para os resultados da COP29. Conseguimos um acordo para triplicar o financiamento 脿s economias em desenvolvimento e mais transpar锚ncia, evitando a corrup莽茫o. Avan莽谩mos nos mercados de carbono. Quem mais polui tem de pagar.

Esta COP29 ficou tamb茅m marcada, infelizmente, por pa铆ses como a Ar谩bia Saudita, que estavam interessados em n茫o serem mais ambiciosos, mas em vez disso, porem em causa o abandono gradual do uso dos combust铆veis f贸sseis. E tamb茅m pela relut芒ncia de pa铆ses como a China em serem doadores permanentes no financiamento clim谩tico.

Apesar destes desafios, apesar do contexto geopol铆tico, a Europa liderou. E eu gostava de dar uma palavra de reconhecimento pelo trabalho do comiss谩rio Wopke Hoekstra, que conseguiu nunca desistir e continuar a liderar em mat茅ria de ambiente.

N茫o podemos falhar. A ci锚ncia 茅 clara e a vontade dos cidad茫os 茅 evidente. E juntos, de facto, fazemos a diferen莽a. E, portanto, uma palavra tamb茅m 脿 Team Europe, que foi bem-sucedida em mais uma COP. Obrigada.

听听Mohammed Chahim, namens de S&D-Fractie. 鈥� Voorzitter, laat ik eens positief beginnen. We hebben onze ambities gelukkig niet teruggedraaid, maar stilstand is, wat mij betreft, ook achteruitgang. Het is niet gelukt om tijdens deze klimaattop COP29 het hoofdstuk klimaatfinanciering af te sluiten, wat echt nodig is om van andere landen meer ambitie te vragen. Voor eilandstaten als de Malediven en Samoa is klimaatverandering elk jaar een stukje meer verdwijnen in de oceaan.

Daarom is die 1听300听miljard nodig. Waar we in 2022 pas voldeden aan de 100听miljard die we in 2015 beloofden, beloven we nu in 2035 300听miljard, wat vooral bestaat uit leningen. Dus ik snap de teleurstelling, kritiek en het gebrek aan vertrouwen bij veel landen. Met dit tempo hebben we meer dan honderd jaar nodig om die 1听300听miljard te bereiken.

De vraag is hoeveel van die eilandstaten er dan nog bestaan. De dialoog rond klimaatverandering blijft gelukkig, maar hebben we een goede uitgangspositie voor volgend jaar? De vraag stellen is hem beantwoorden. E茅n ding staat vast: we hebben veel werk te verzetten, niet alleen voor de financiering voor klimaat, maar ook om de ambities op te trekken. Want klimaatactie wacht niet op het juiste podium.

听听Isabella Tovaglieri, a nome del gruppo PfE. 鈥� Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, alla conferenza sul clima appena terminata a Baku abbiamo assistito ad un surreale gioco del Monopoli dell'ambiente, perch茅 siamo passati dai 1.300 miliardi inizialmente richiesti per la transizione ambientale, ad accordarsi a tarallucci e vino, per soli 300 miliardi, che ovviamente saranno i cittadini europei a pagare.

脠 stata l'ennesima conferenza a consentire di fatto al pi霉 grande inquinatore del mondo, la Cina, di continuare ad inquinare senza limiti e senza che gli si chieda nemmeno di mettere un euro per ci貌 che fa, perch茅 tanto il conto della transizione lo paga l'Europa.

Sempre l'Europa che con i suoi soldi finanzia le auto elettriche cinesi prodotte in fabbriche ancora alimentate a carbone. Per cui, alla fine, siamo solo l'unico continente a pagare per la transizione: con la distruzione dell'industria, con la perdita dei posti di lavori, ma in pi霉 ci tocca ancora una volta dare i soldi per finanziare i grandi inquinatori, per cui 猫 ora che l'Unione europea difenda il nostro sviluppo e pretenda che siano i veri inquinatori, finalmente, a pagare il conto.

听听Anna Zalewska, w imieniu grupy ECR. 鈥� Panie Przewodnicz膮cy! Panie Komisarzu! Kole偶anki i Koledzy! Kilka s艂贸w prawdy o tym, co dzia艂o si臋 na szczycie klimatycznym.

Po pierwsze, porozumienie po zako艅czeniu COP-u wym臋czone, powierzchowne i 偶yczeniowe. Chocia偶by owe 300 miliard贸w co roku, w艂a艣ciwie bez konkretnych wskaza艅 i konkretnych kwot, przy bardzo ma艂ym zaanga偶owaniu Stan贸w Zjednoczonych, kt贸re dostarcza艂y pieni膮dze. Mamy zapowied藕, 偶e Stany Zjednoczone w og贸le wyjd膮 z porozumienia paryskiego. To po pierwsze.

Po drugie, ogromne emocje zwi膮zane z tymi, kt贸rzy s膮 rozwini臋ci i bogaci, a nie chc膮 by膰 na li艣cie inaczej nazwani. W zwi膮zku z tym s膮 zwolnieni z tych偶e op艂at, jak na przyk艂ad Chi艅czycy. Po drugie, absolutna negacja tych ambitnych plan贸w Unii Europejskiej. Wi臋kszo艣膰 kraj贸w m贸wi艂a po prostu: mo偶ecie sobie realizowa膰 swoje ambicje, ale my nie pozwolimy na to, 偶eby niszczy膰 nasze gospodarki. Tak naprawd臋 w kuluarach ka偶dy chodzi艂 z raportem Draghiego i pokazywa艂, do czego doprowadzi艂a zielona polityka i ambicje niemo偶liwe do realizacji. Wreszcie po raz pierwszy wyra藕nie nie ma mowy o wycofywaniu si臋 z paliw kopalnych. Czas zweryfikowa膰 Zielony 艁ad Unii Europejskiej, bo prowadzi on do zapa艣ci gospodarczej i do katastrofy finansowej Europejczyk贸w.

听听Sigrid Friis, for Renew-Gruppen. 鈥� Hr. formand! Det var en interessant tur til Baku i sidste uge p氓 COP 29. Omgivet af oliedampe og lugten af gas kunne man alligevel blive enige om tre hundrede milliarder dollars 氓rligt i klimabistand til verdens mest udsatte lande, men det er tusind milliarder mindre, end der er brug for, for at kunne investere i de n酶dvendige klimatiltag. Og ja, en aftale er bedre end ingenting, is忙r n氓r Trump truer med at tr忙kke USA ud af Parisaftalen. Men COP 29 er stadigv忙k en skuffelse. Saudi-Arabien og resten af olieproducenterne er kommet ud som sejrherrer, og de kan grine hele vejen til banken. Det samme kan Kina. Et land, som kan sende rumraketter til m氓nen, men som stadig anses som et udviklingsland og ikke er forpligtet til at betale deres fair del. Og i mods忙tning til sidste 氓r p氓 COP 28 kunne verdens lande heller ikke blive enige om, at vi skal nedbringe brugen af fossile br忙ndsler. Men vi skal jo ikke g氓 i bakgear, n氓r det kommer til at bek忙mpe klimaforandringerne. Vi skal s忙tte speederen i bund. S氓 nu haster det. Hvis det globale klimalederskab s氓 skal EU alts氓 indsende et ambiti酶st klimam氓l f酶r 2035, f酶r COP 30, inden fristen i februar. Vil du som klimakommiss忙r garantere det og sikre, at klimam氓let stemmer overens med det lovede 2040-m氓l p氓 90 %?

听听Michael Bloss, im Namen der Verts/ALE-Fraktion. 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, sehr geehrte Damen und Herren! Das Ergebnis dieser Klimakonferenz ist zu mickrig, um der Klimakrise gerecht zu werden. Daraus ziehe ich drei Lehren: Erstens: Fossile Autokratien d眉rfen nie mehr Gastgeber einer Klimakonferenz sein. Aserbaidschan hat seine fossile Agenda vorangetrieben, w盲hrend unser Planet brennt. Der Brandstifter soll das Feuer l枚schen. Das geht nicht.

Zweitens: Stimmen aus Bangladesch, den Malediven und den Philippinen haben es auf den Punkt gebracht. Jeder verlorene Tag kostet Leben. Die Klimakrise ist 眉berall angekommen. Sie wartet nicht, sie verhandelt nicht, sie versch盲rft sich.

Und drittens: Europa ist seiner globalen F眉hrungsrolle noch nicht gewachsen. Die Abwesenheit von Scholz, Macron und von der Leyen zu Beginn war fatal. Ich danke Herrn Hoekstra f眉r seinen Einsatz. Aber Europa muss nach vorne gehen und sein neues Klimaziel, seinen NDC schon im Januar vorlegen. Europa tr盲gt nicht nur Verantwortung, Europa hat die Pflicht, Klimaschutz anzuf眉hren.

PR脡SIDENCE: YOUNOUS OMARJEE
痴颈肠别-笔谤茅蝉颈诲别苍迟

听听螡喂魏蠈位伪蟼 桅伪蟻伪谓蟿慰蠉蟻畏蟼, 蔚尉 慰谓蠈渭伪蟿慰蟼 蟿畏蟼 慰渭维未伪蟼 The Left. 鈥� 螝蠉蟻喂蔚 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 蟺蠈蟽畏 蠀蟺慰魏蟻喂蟽委伪 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 伪谓蟿苇尉蔚喂 慰 蟺位伪谓萎蟿畏蟼; 螤蠈蟽畏 蠀蟺慰魏蟻喂蟽委伪 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 伪谓蟿苇尉蔚喂 畏 魏慰喂谓蠅谓委伪; 韦伪 伪蟺慰蟿蔚位苇蟽渭伪蟿伪 蟿畏蟼 螤伪纬魏蠈蟽渭喂伪蟼 危蠀谓未喂维蟽魏蔚蠄畏蟼 纬喂伪 蟿慰 螝位委渭伪 蔚委谓伪喂 伪蟺慰纬慰畏蟿蔚蠀蟿喂魏维. 螖蔚谓 蟺蟻慰蠂蠅蟻萎蟽伪渭蔚 蟿畏 蟽蠀味萎蟿畏蟽畏 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 蠀蟺慰蠂蠋蟻畏蟽畏 蟿蠅谓 慰蟻蠀魏蟿蠋谓 魏伪蠀蟽委渭蠅谓, 蟺慰蠀 蔚委蠂蔚 尉蔚魏喂谓萎蟽蔚喂 蟽蟿畏谓 蟺蟻慰畏纬慰蠉渭蔚谓畏 蟽蠀谓未喂维蟽魏蔚蠄畏, 魏伪喂, 伪蠀蟿萎 蟿畏 蠁慰蟻维, 未喂慰蟻纬伪谓蠅蟿萎蟼 萎蟿伪谓 渭喂伪 蠂蠋蟻伪 畏 慰蟺慰委伪 尾伪蟽委味蔚喂 蟿畏谓 慰喂魏慰谓慰渭委伪 蟿畏蟼 蟽蟿伪 慰蟻蠀魏蟿维 魏伪蠉蟽喂渭伪.

螤蠋蟼 伪位位喂蠋蟼, 位慰喂蟺蠈谓, 胃伪 魏伪蟿伪蟺慰位蔚渭萎蟽慰蠀渭蔚 蟿喂蟼 蔚蟺喂蟺蟿蠋蟽蔚喂蟼 伪蟺蠈 蟿畏谓 魏位喂渭伪蟿喂魏萎 魏蟻委蟽畏, 伪谓 未蔚谓 渭喂位萎蟽慰蠀渭蔚 渭蔚 蔚喂位喂魏蟻委谓蔚喂伪 渭蔚蟿伪尉蠉 渭伪蟼, 伪谓 未蔚谓 魏伪胃喂蔚蟻蠋蟽慰蠀渭蔚 蟿畏 纬蔚谓喂魏萎 伪蟻蠂萎 芦慰 蟻蠀蟺伪委谓蠅谓 蟺位畏蟻蠋谓蔚喂禄 鈥撓�慰蠀 喂蟽蠂蠉蔚喂 蟽蟿畏谓 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 螆谓蠅蟽畏 魏伪喂 蟽蔚 蟺伪纬魏蠈蟽渭喂慰 蔚蟺委蟺蔚未慰鈥� 渭蔚 蟿畏谓 蔚蟺喂尾维蟻蠀谓蟽畏 魏伪喂 蟿畏 蠁慰蟻慰位蠈纬畏蟽畏 蟿蠅谓 蔚蟿伪喂蟻喂魏蠋谓 慰蟻蠀魏蟿蠋谓 魏伪蠀蟽委渭蠅谓; 危伪蟼 魏伪位蠋, 位慰喂蟺蠈谓, 蟽蔚 蟺喂慰 蔚谓蔚蟻纬畏蟿喂魏苇蟼 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏苇蟼.

听听Anja Arndt, im Namen der ESN-Fraktion. 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident! Auf der Klimakonferenz in Baku ging es wieder hoch her. Es soll noch mehr Geld flie脽en f眉r den aussichtslosen Kampf gegen den Klimawandel, und zwar von den Industriestaaten zu den Entwicklungsl盲ndern. Das Geld soll f眉r klimafreundliche gr眉ne Technologien verwendet werden. Wer hat sich das eigentlich ausgedacht? Die Anbieter gr眉ner Technologien? Vertreter von Entwicklungsl盲ndern nannten die neu vereinbarte Summe, die recht hoch ist听鈥� sie ist n盲mlich in der H枚he von 300听000 Millionen Dollar pro Jahr angesetzt听鈥�, sie nannten sie einfach mal abgr眉ndig klein und d眉rftig. Sie sei eine Beleidigung und ein Witz.

Bisher flossen schon jedes Jahr 100听000 Millionen Dollar von den Industriestaaten zu den Entwicklungsl盲ndern. Dieses Geld wird听鈥� und das ist nun der echte Witz des Tages听鈥� auch an Indien, China, die reichen Golfstaaten und S眉dkorea gezahlt. Warum? Weil sie nach der 30听Jahre alten UNO鈥慐instufung als Entwicklungsl盲nder eingestuft werden. Es wird aber noch absurder: Durch die EU鈥慘limapolitik werden die eigenen Industriestaaten im Eiltempo deindustrialisiert, zahlungsunf盲hig und damit selbst zu Entwicklungsl盲ndern gemacht. Das arme Portugal und Griechenland und schon in K眉rze das arme Deutschland sollen f眉r das reiche China und Saudi鈥慉rabien zahlen. Wir ruinieren uns selbst mit unserer Klimapolitik. Das ist klimapolitischer Extremismus. Wir von der AfD und dem ESN sagen: Schluss damit!

听听Peter Liese (PPE). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Der Klimawandel bleibt eine der gr枚脽ten Herausforderungen unserer Politikergeneration. Und bei aller berechtigten Kritik an dem internationalen Prozess 鈥� ich habe noch niemanden getroffen, der eine bessere Methode vorgeschlagen hat. Einfach nur zu sagen, ja, man m眉sste es irgendwie anders machen, das hilft nicht weiter.

Sondern 鈥� so schwierig dieser Prozess auch ist 鈥� wir m眉ssen mit ihm arbeiten. Aber ich kann es auch nicht verhehlen, dass wir nur teilweise erfolgreich waren: Dass China und andere sich nicht gesetzlich, nicht rechtlich verpflichtet haben 鈥� verbindlich 鈥�, dass sie beitragen zur Finanzierung des Klimaschutzes, bleibt ein Problem. Und die Kommission ist aufgerufen, wir alle sind aufgerufen, an diesem Thema weiterhin zu arbeiten.

Entscheidend ist, dass wir auf dem Weg bis n盲chstes Jahr gute Ziele f眉r das Jahr 2035 erreichen. Und hier haben wir, glaube ich, noch eine Herausforderung. Wir haben eine Position der Kommission f眉r 90听% f眉r 2040. Ich bin noch nicht davon 眉berzeugt, dass das ein Ziel ist, das wir auch wirklich schaffen k枚nnen. Daran m眉ssen wir hart arbeiten, die Wege aufzuzeigen, wie es dann am Ende wirklich funktioniert. Aber international haben jetzt erste Staaten schon ein Ziel f眉r 2035 vorgelegt. Wenige 鈥� alles noch nicht so dramatisch 鈥�, aber die Europ盲ische Union braucht eben auch ein Ziel f眉r 2035. Und ich glaube nicht, dass man da einfach die Mittellinie nehmen kann zwischen 55听% und 90听%, sondern da bedarf es noch einmal besonderer Anstrengungen听鈥� auch ein impact assessment, Zusammenarbeit mit der Wirtschaft听鈥�, da wirklich ein gutes Ziel vorzulegen. Und ich bitte die Kommission, an diesem Thema hart zu arbeiten.

听听Annalisa Corrado (S&D). 鈥� Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, 猫 vero, la conferenza sul clima di Baku si 猫 conclusa con risultati fortemente inadeguati alla dimensione della crisi in atto, che sempre pi霉 spesso impatta drammaticamente sulle nostre comunit脿.

Ma voglio dirlo, avendo avuto l'onore di prendervi parte con la delegazione del Parlamento: abbiamo scongiurato come Unione europea, e con pochissimi altri alleati, che la conferenza fallisse. E per questo voglio ringraziare il commissario Hoekstra.

L'obiettivo di finanza climatica al 2035, con la听roadmap per arrivare a mobilitare 1.300 miliardi, tiene aperto un passaggio strettissimo che ci impegna a lavorare, in vista della COP30 di Belem, con maggiore determinazione su mitigazione, adattamento e fondi per le perdite ai danni.

Porto con me da Baku un'immagine in particolare: l'incontro con il dissidente azero Gubad Ibadoghlu, finalista del nostro Premio Sacharov, in regime di detenzione anche per aver denunciato i legami opachi tra l'industria di petrolio e gas del suo Paese e la Russia.

Lavorare per la transizione energetica significa anche questo: liberarci dalle dipendenze fossili che non ci consentono di alzare la voce quanto necessario per il rispetto dei diritti umani.

听听Ond艡ej Knotek (PfE). 鈥� Pane p艡edsedaj铆c铆, v谩啪n臎 tady oslavujete, 啪e zem臎, kter茅 sni啪uj铆 emise sklen铆kov媒ch plyn暖, v膷etn臎 t臎ch evropsk媒ch, budou platit 300 miliard dolar暖 ro膷n臎 zem铆m, kter茅 naopak emise v posledn铆ch letech v媒razn臎 zv媒拧ily, s t铆m, 啪e mo啪n谩 nakonec p艡estanou? Ukazujete t铆m, 啪e tyto konference a mezin谩rodn铆 panely pro klima ji啪 d谩vno neslou啪铆 k zaji拧t臎n铆 udr啪iteln茅 klimatick茅 politiky. Stal se z nich n谩stroj na p艡erozd臎len铆 bohatstv铆 a uspokojen铆 klimatick媒ch alarmist暖. V媒sledkem je okraden铆 na拧ich ob膷an暖 nejenom o jejich pen铆ze, ale i o jejich budoucnost. A vy tomu je拧t臎 tlesk谩te? Klimatu nepom暖啪ete a Evropu hospod谩艡sky zahub铆te. Va拧e ideologick谩, zelen谩, progresivn铆 a neudr啪iteln谩 politika je cestou do z谩huby. Tak ji pros铆m skon膷ete.

(艠e膷n铆k souhlasil s t铆m, 啪e odpov铆 na vystoupen铆 na z谩klad臎 zvednut铆 modr茅 karty)

听听Emma Wiesner (Renew), blue-card question. 鈥� Ond艡ej, the 3.1 掳C scenario of climate change 鈥� that is what will destroy Europe's economy. Is that really your message to the small island states, the developing countries that have not emitted historically but are now suffering from climate change? Their islands are disappearing, and your message is 'we are destroying our economy'? We built our economy based on fossil fuels. They have none, and we are destroying their possibilities of living. That is what the USD听3听billion is all about, taking responsibility for what we have caused them.

听听Ond艡ej Knotek (PfE), blue-card answer. 鈥� (Start of speech off mic) ... is that your policies, policies of climate activists, as you are, are not leading to saving the climate. You are lying to people about that if they will be ambitious, that there will be no floods and so on and so on. But that's not true. You have no data, you have no science base, you have no impact assessments: you are just lying. So you are the root cause.

听听Ond艡ej Krut铆lek (ECR). 鈥� Pane p艡edsedaj铆c铆, v谩啪en媒 pane komisa艡i, j谩 se pokus铆m tu debatu tro拧i膷ku zklidnit. Kdy啪 jsme p艡ed dv臎ma t媒dny diskutovali mand谩t na COP 29, tak j谩 jsem vyjad艡oval ohledn臎 z谩sadn铆ho posunu skeptickou pozici. Konference prob臎hla, jsem r谩d, 啪e jsem mohl b媒t sou膷谩st铆 parlamentn铆 delegace, nicm茅n臎 ohledn臎 dohody, kter谩 vznikla stran financov谩n铆, nem暖啪e b媒t podle m茅ho soudu spokojen v暖bec nikdo. Uk谩zalo se, 啪e hlas Evropsk茅 unie nen铆 nejsiln臎j拧铆. Mus铆me b媒t realist茅 a mus铆me se pou膷it z toho, co se stalo. S ostatn铆mi st谩ty nem暖啪eme jednat z pozice s铆ly a nad艡azenosti, ale kreativn臎. Jenom tak m暖啪eme dos谩hnout toho, aby 煤膷et neplatili jenom tradi膷n铆 pl谩tci v膷etn臎 n谩s, ale i dal拧铆 ekonomicky vysp臎l茅 zem臎, jako je t艡eba 膶铆na. A na拧im partner暖m mus铆me neust谩le p艡ipom铆nat, k 膷emu se zav谩zali. Nesm铆me z暖stat izolovan媒m ostrovem, kter媒 jako jedin媒 vzorn臎 pln铆 svoje dekarboniza膷n铆 鈥� a chci dodat ambici贸zn铆 dekarboniza膷n铆 鈥� c铆le bez ohledu na z谩va啪n茅 ekonomick茅 a spole膷ensk茅 dopady.

听听Emma Wiesner (Renew). 鈥� Mr听President, so, how to summarise this COP29? It's a mixed bag of feelings: from disappointment to embarrassment to determination and a relief that there is a deal. But we have to ask ourselves, what will future generations remember from Baku?

And just as many times before, we didn't do enough, we didn't do it in time, and we didn't do it in place. We have to face it. The USD听300听billion 鈥� well, looking at inflation until 2035, it's barely an increase of ambitions.

We have to learn from this. The EU, in this 合法博彩网站, we can do more, we can do better, we can do it earlier and we can do it sooner. And this will have to be done if we are going to change and get away from the 3.1听掳C hell scenario of climate change. Next year in Brazil, we have to do better!

I'm not satisfied with the efforts of this Union. I am not satisfied by the efforts of this 合法博彩网站, nor with the global commitment. But I am determined that we can improve, simply because we have to.

听听Lena Schilling (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Mr President, dear colleagues, I would love to start with talking about climate finance, but I need to start with a message I received a lot in the last few days from Azerbaijan:

'Shame on you and glory to Azerbaijan! COP29 turned out to be a fantastic success story, and you have failed'.

This is one of dozens of messages I have received from Azerbaijani numbers since COP. Fossil fuel regimes try to sabotage phasing out fossil fuels, even as they witness the destruction and suffering it causes. Fossil fuel dictators host climate conferences, put gas deals over fighting the climate crisis and call it a success story.听Dear President Aliyev, no, COP was not a success story. You silenced activists, journalists and civil society. You imprisoned 300 individuals who dared to stand against you. You tried to use COP29 as a stage to greenwash your regime: you failed.

We need climate action above fossil interests. We can't continue making oil and gas deals with these autocratic regimes. And that is what we need to do right now.

听听Li Andersson (The Left). 鈥� Arvoisa puhemies, parempi v盲h盲n kun ei mit盲盲n. N盲in ilmastokokousten lopputulosta on kuvattu, mutta niin ei ole. Meill盲 ei ole en盲盲 aikaa ajatella, ett盲 "v盲h盲n" on tyydytt盲v盲 ratkaisu ilmastonmuutoksen vastaisessa taistelussa. Meill盲 ei ole en盲盲 aikaa yhteenk盲盲n v盲likokoukseen tai k盲denl盲mp枚iseen kompromissiin, kun kyse on planeetan elinkelpoisuudesta.

Kokouksen p盲盲aiheena oli rahoitus. Tutkijoiden mukaan ulkoisen rahoituksen tarve kehittyville maille on t盲ll盲 hetkell盲 vajaa tuhat听miljardia vuodessa. Silti kokouksessa p盲盲tettiin vain 286 miljardin vuosittaisesta rahoituksesta ja t盲st盲kin osan pit盲isi tulla markkinoilta.

Markkinaehtoisen rahoituksen ongelma on, ett盲 monet k枚yhemm盲t ja ilmastonmuutoksen vaikutuksille alttiit maat ovat jo raskaasti velkaantuneita ja niiden markkinoilta saaman rahoituksen hinta on moninkertainen vauraampiin maihin verrattuna. Samaan aikaan vauraat maat k盲ytt盲v盲t 6,6 biljoonaa euroa fossiilisen energian tukiin. T盲m盲 on t盲ysin kest盲m盲t枚nt盲.

听听Milan Mazurek (NI). 鈥� V谩啪en媒 p谩n predsedaj煤ci, chcete zachr谩ni钮 plan茅tu? Tak v prvom rade presta艌te s va拧imi zelen媒mi nezmyslami, ktor茅 ni膷ia 啪ivot 木udom v 膷lensk媒ch 拧t谩toch Eur贸pskej 煤nie. Vy sn谩膹 nevid铆te, ko木ko dnes v Eur贸pe stoja nehnute木nosti? Ko木ko musia 木udia plati钮 za to, aby si mohli k煤pi钮 dom alebo byt, pr铆padne si t煤to nehnute木nos钮 prenaja钮? Vy sn谩膹 nevid铆te, 啪e mlad铆 木udia si u啪 nem么啪u v Eur贸pe zaklada钮 rodiny, preto啪e je v拧etko extr茅mne drah茅? A 膷o je va拧a odpove膹? Zavediete 膹al拧ie opatrenia? Zavediete 膹al拧ie n谩klady? Poviete im, 啪e bud煤 ma钮 emisn茅 povolenky na vykurovanie vo vlastn媒ch dom谩cnostiach? Poviete im, 啪e bud煤 plati钮 拧peci谩lnu da艌 z benz铆nu, 拧peci谩lnu da艌 z plynu, aby e拧te aj energie, ktor茅 s煤 neuverite木ne drah茅, boli e拧te drah拧ie rok za rokom? Vy sn谩膹 nevid铆te, kam sa Eur贸pa prepad谩? Nevid铆te, 啪e chudobnieme? Nevid铆te, 啪e cel媒 svet n谩s predbehol? Unik谩 n谩m a vy poviete, 啪e m谩me plati钮 膹al拧铆ch 300 mili谩rd na va拧e zelen茅 nezmysly, ktor茅 doteraz v啪dy a z谩konite zlyhali? Plan茅ta potrebuje zachr谩ni钮 od va拧ich hl煤pych n谩padov.

听听Ingeborg Ter Laak (PPE). 鈥� Voorzitter, je bent de puinhoop nog aan het opruimen en daar komt de volgende overstroming alweer aan. Het is nu letterlijk dweilen met de kraan open voor eilanden in de Stille Oceaan. Dit gebeurt nu daar, maar het staat Europa ook te wachten. De boodschap op de klimaattop was duidelijk: geef meer geld!

De meest kwetsbare mensen worden het hardst geraakt. Het is aan ons om te zorgen dat niemand achterblijft. De kosten van nietsdoen zijn vele malen groter. Gelukkig is er uiteindelijk een akkoord gekomen, maar dit is niet het punt waarop wij kunnen stoppen. Volgend jaar op de klimaattop in Brazili毛 zullen wij gezamenlijk doelen voor 2035 vaststellen. Deze doelen zijn belangrijk, maar nog veel belangrijker is het dat wij en andere landen deze doelen gaan naleven.

听听Tsvetelina Penkova (S&D). 鈥� Mr President, Commissioner, colleagues, as part of the delegation at COP29 in Baku last week, I can assure you that the participation of the European 合法博彩网站 there is key and crucial. Apart from the call for greater financing for the developing countries, which was one of the requests from the Global South, there was an additional one: a clear and foreseeable regulatory framework.

The agreed commitment for USD听300听billion of investment is a small step. However, in the upcoming years, we will not only be facing the lack of financing; we will also need clear and predictable investments from the developing countries that are already experiencing impressive economic growth.

What I saw on the ground during our meetings with the various national delegations is the same desire for predictability that I see here in Europe, in the Just Transition regions. People want to be certain that the rules of the game will not change midway. If Europe wants to remain at the forefront of climate diplomacy, we must first make sure that we solve our problems domestically and lead by example.

听听Jorge Buxad茅 Villalba (PfE). 鈥� Se帽or presidente, he le铆do el discurso de cierre de la CP29 y estas son mis conclusiones.

Cuando un bur贸crata dice una barbaridad, como que triplicar la financiaci贸n en pol铆ticas verdes es una p贸liza de seguros para la humanidad, pero que hay que pagar la prima 铆ntegramente y cuanto antes, acaba de desvelar que su 煤nico inter茅s es vaciar los bolsillos de los europeos para llen谩rselos 茅l. Su discurso es el de otro soci贸pata que se cree con derecho a planificar nuestra sociedad y nuestra econom铆a. Poner como ejemplo al Reino Unido y Brasil 鈥攄os Gobiernos izquierdistas que se han pasado el verano metiendo en la c谩rcel a disidentes pol铆ticos y violando las libertades civiles鈥� demuestra cu谩l es su clase de referentes.

驴Qu茅 creen que pensaron los vecinos de Valencia cuando vieron a Pedro S谩nchez subirse al Falcon y dirigirse a la Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Clim谩tico para esconderse de los espa帽oles? 驴Qu茅 creen que piensan los que han padecido en carne propia las consecuencias letales de la histeria clim谩tica a la que quieren triplicar su locura? Lo que hubiera salvado vidas es triplicar la inversi贸n en limpiar los cauces de los r铆os y ejecutar presas y canalizaciones.

Miren, el Acuerdo de Par铆s se ha revelado como una soga al cuello de nuestra libertad y nuestra prosperidad.

(El orador acepta responder a varias preguntas formuladas con arreglo al procedimiento de la 芦tarjeta azul禄)

听听L铆dia Pereira (PPE), Pergunta segundo o procedimento 芦cart茫o azul禄. 鈥� Senhor Deputado, depois do que aconteceu recentemente com as cheias em Val锚ncia, com os inc锚ndios em Portugal no in铆cio de setembro, com as cheias no Leste Europeu, o senhor acredita ou n茫o acredita nas altera莽玫es clim谩ticas? 脡 que, se acredita, se calhar conv茅m que a Uni茫o Europeia fa莽a mais do que tem feito. E isso tem sido poss铆vel 脿 custa do di谩logo com outros pa铆ses e com os pa铆ses mais vulner谩veis. Portanto, a pergunta que lhe fa莽o 茅 muito simples: acredita ou n茫o acredita nas altera莽玫es clim谩ticas?

听听Jorge Buxad茅 Villalba (PfE), respuesta de 芦tarjeta azul禄. 鈥� Su pregunta es sencilla y mi respuesta tambi茅n es sencilla: creo, claramente, en la capacidad del ser humano para adaptarse, innovar, trabajar y, sobre todo, buscar soluciones a los problemas. El hombre ha tenido siempre que enfrentarse a la naturaleza, dominarla.

Lo que s铆 le puedo decir es que, respecto a Valencia, la responsabilidad exclusiva es de Teresa Ribera, a la que ustedes van a nombrar vicepresidente de la Comisi贸n Europea, que dej贸 de ejecutar las canalizaciones, las presas y la limpieza de los cauces, provocando la muerte de m谩s de 230 espa帽oles. De eso no tengo ninguna duda.

听听Emma Wiesner (Renew), blue-card question. 鈥� I didn't get it. Do you believe in climate change or you don't?

听听Jorge Buxad茅 Villalba (PfE), respuesta de 芦tarjeta azul禄. 鈥� Pues se lo voy a volver a repetir. Creo en la capacidad del hombre y creo en Dios, evidentemente, no creo en teor铆as pol铆ticas o en teor铆as ideol贸gicas. Por supuesto, creo que el hombre, desde que lleg贸 a este planeta, se ha adaptado, ha ido innovando, ha ido descubriendo, inventando. Tenemos ciudades y pa铆ses que est谩n por debajo del nivel del mar. Hemos sabido canalizar r铆os. Gracias a las obras que se hicieron en Espa帽a en el a帽o 1957, la ciudad, la capital de Valencia, no ha sido arrasada por las inundaciones. No, si con tanta tarjeta azul me tendr谩 que dejar hablar. Esa es la realidad. Creo en esto, en la capacidad del ser humano de adaptarse y mejorar.

听听Rasmus Nordqvist (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Mr听President, this year we have witnessed devastating floods in Central Europe, wildfires in Greece and most recently, human catastrophe in Spain 鈥� all driven by climate change.

Climate change is no longer a distant future scenario. It is here. It's tangible, it's costly, and it's dangerous. Climate change has entered a new and more critical phase, but the way we talk about it remains the same. And the poor outcome of this year's COP29 is clear proof of that.

The Global North bears an historical responsibility for the crisis we are facing. This was acknowledged in Article听9 of the Paris Agreement. And yet, the Global North has shown itself to be unwilling and unprepared to honour its commitments by failing to provide necessary funding.

We are creating policies that are totally disconnected from reality. Instead, we must make reality the foundation of our political decisions. I am sorry, we actually decided on 1.5 and we already breached this.

听听Sebastian Everding (The Left). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident! Zusammenfassung der COP 29 in einem Wort: entt盲uschend. Zu wenig und zu sp盲t, sagen beispielsweise afrikanische Unterh盲ndler. Und es sind gerade die L盲nder des globalen S眉dens, die am allermeisten unter Klimafolgen leiden m眉ssen. 300听Milliarden US-Dollar bis 2035 鈥� ein Tropfen auf den hei脽en Stein. Es braucht viel mehr Investitionen und auch beispielsweise einen Schuldenerlass f眉r den globalen S眉den.

Ein Weg, erforderliche Gelder bereitstellen zu k枚nnen, k枚nnte der d盲nische Green Deal sein. Der Agrarsektor ist f眉r einen erheblichen Teil der Klimaemissionen verantwortlich, weswegen D盲nemark ab 2030 eine Klimasteuer auf Fleisch und Milch einf眉hrt. 鈥濪ie Tier- und Klimasch眉tzer wollen mir mein Schnitzel wegnehmen!鈥� Nein, wir wollen ausschlie脽lich, dass das Schnitzel den Preis bekommt, der auch die Umweltzerst枚rung, den Klimawandel und auch Tierleid enth盲lt.

听听Andr谩s Tivadar Kulja (PPE). 鈥� Tisztelt Eln枚k 脷r! M煤lt h茅ten r茅szt vettem a COP29 kl铆macs煤cson Bakuban. Ennek sor谩n sz谩mos orsz谩g deleg谩ci贸j谩val volt szerencs茅nk tal谩lkozni 茅s t谩rgyalni. Az egyeztet茅sek pedig 煤jfent r谩vil谩g铆tottak arra, hogy csak az egy眉ttm疟k枚d茅sen alapul贸 nemzetk枚zi k枚z枚s cselekv茅s vezethet eredm茅nyre. Az 茅ghajlatv茅delmi int茅zked茅seket 煤gy kell kialak铆tanunk, hogy azok ne csak a k谩rosanyag-kibocs谩t谩s m茅rs茅kl茅s茅t szolg谩lj谩k, hanem egyben t谩rsadalmi probl茅m谩kra is v谩laszt adjanak. 脥gy tarthatjuk meg az emberek bizalm谩t 茅s akad谩lyozhatjuk meg a populist谩k el艖ret枚r茅s茅t.

脡p眉letenergetikai beruh谩z谩sokkal jav铆thatjuk az emberek lakhat谩si k枚r眉lm茅nyeit, mik枚zben cs枚kkentj眉k az energiaf眉gg艖s茅get, 茅s a szeg茅nyebb t谩rsadalmi r茅tegek sz谩m谩ra eg茅szs茅gesebb k枚rnyezetet teremthet眉nk. Eur贸p谩nak p茅ld谩t kell mutatnia. Az 茅ghajlatv茅delem siker茅t csak akkor 茅rhetj眉k el, ha egy煤ttal a t谩rsadalmi igazs谩goss谩got 茅s gazdas谩gi stabilit谩st is szolg谩ljuk.

听听Andrea Wechsler (PPE). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, sehr geehrter Herr Kommissar Hoekstra, sehr geehrte Damen und Herren! Auf der Klimaweltkonferenz COP听29 hat sich gezeigt: Wir Europ盲er haben die globale F眉hrungsrolle im Bereich des Klimaschutzes in Verantwortung f眉r unsere B眉rgerinnen und B眉rger 眉bernommen. Allen, die dazu beigetragen haben, m枚chte ich an dieser Stelle herzlich danken. Wir haben klare Fortschritte erzielt, gemeinsam mit unseren internationalen Partnern.

Mit dem neuen globalen Finanzierungsziel von 300听Milliarden Dollar j盲hrlich bis 2035 haben wir Solidarit盲t bewiesen, ohne unsere europ盲ischen M枚glichkeiten zu 眉berfordern. Ein entscheidender Erfolg ist nun, dass auch L盲nder mit wachsender wirtschaftlicher St盲rke ihren Beitrag leisten werden. Dabei ist eines klar: Basis eines verl盲sslichen und erfolgreichen Klimaschutzes ist eine wettbewerbsf盲hige Industrie in Europa. Daran arbeiten wir Hand in Hand mit dem Klimaschutz. Dabei werden wir weiterhin den Menschen in das Zentrum unserer Klimapolitik stellen.

Interventions 脿 la demande

听听Nikolina Brnjac (PPE). 鈥� Po拧tovani predsjedavaju膰i, po拧tovani povjereni膷e, dolazim iz Hrvatske, jedne od zemalja Mediterana, koji je suo膷en s ozbiljnim izazovima zbog klimatskih promjena. Mediteran, dom vi拧e od pola milijarde ljudi, zagrijava se br啪e od globalnog prosjeka, 拧to ga 膷ini jednom od klimatski najranjivijih regija na svijetu.

Hrvatska, s vi拧e od 1200 otoka i tre膰om najdu啪om obalom Sredozemnog mora, duboko razumije da vrijeme za odlu膷nu borbu protiv klimatskih promjena istje膷e. Zato mi je drago da nakon Glasgowske deklaracije imamo i novu deklaraciju o unaprije膽enoj klimatskoj akciji u turizmu.

Nastavljanje dosada拧njeg modela turizma, prema procjenama bi moglo dovesti do 膷ak 25 % pove膰anja emisija stakleni膷kih plinova povezanih s turizmom, koji je ve膰 sada odgovoran za 8,8 % globalnih emisija. U tom kontekstu vjerujem da 膰e i Europska unija, kao najposje膰enija destinacija svijeta, preuzeti vode膰e mjesto u stvaranju politika koje 膰e smanjiti 拧tetni utjecaj turizma na klimu.

听听Jo茫o Oliveira (The Left). 鈥� Os resultados desta COP 29 podem bem ser caracterizados pela indefini莽茫o quanto a metas, a insufici锚ncia de financiamento e desadequa莽茫o dos mecanismos para a adapta莽茫o e mitiga莽茫o das altera莽玫es clim谩ticas.

Os pa铆ses desenvolvidos sacodem as suas responsabilidades hist贸ricas e procuram determinar as a莽玫es a implementar, condicionando-as a mais empr茅stimos e endividamento dos demais pa铆ses. Insistem em falsas e perigosas solu莽玫es de mercado, garantindo que, quem pode pagar, polui. N茫o 茅 poss铆vel garantir uma rela莽茫o harmoniosa entre o ser humano e a natureza, mantendo as mesmas pol铆ticas que aqui nos trouxeram.

Alterar paradigmas produtivos, recuperar setores estrat茅gicos para o controlo p煤blico, desenvolver pol铆ticas de combate ao desperd铆cio e 脿 obsolesc锚ncia programada, refor莽ar o investimento na investiga莽茫o cient铆fica, promover adequadas pol铆ticas de ordenamento territorial, reconhecer a cada pa铆s e a cada povo a sua soberania e o seu direito a produzir, e rejeitar a guerra. Esses s茫o elementos de uma pol铆tica alternativa imprescind铆vel para responder aos desafios ambientais com que a humanidade se confronta.

听听Grzegorz Braun (NI). 鈥� Mr听President, it's good and nice to hear that some of you are beginning to back up from your doctrine of global warming, Green Deal and other superstitions that are proposed here. It's nice that some back up, but it would be much nicer if you simply rejected this false, not scientifically-based, not fact-checked doctrine because it's devastating. It's ruining Europe and all the world wherever you Marxists, Leninists, Lysenkoists take power. So it's really high time and probably the last minute to jump off this crazy train that is heading to some abyss.

听听Lukas Sieper (NI). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, liebe Menschen Europas! Wie bei jeder klimabezogenen Debatte h枚ren wir viele gute Dinge, aber auch viele Dinge, die einen wirklich in die Verzweiflung treiben. Und damit beziehe ich mich nicht nur auf einen Kollegen, der von Aberglauben spricht, w盲hrend er gleichzeitig viele seiner Reden mit einer religi枚sen Preisungsformel an Jesus Christus beginnt, sondern ich beziehe mich auf Kollegen, die den Klimawandel grunds盲tzlich leugnen, und听鈥撎齛m allerschlimmsten, und das habe ich heute wirklich zum ersten Mal in dieser Deutlichkeit geh枚rt听鈥� auf Kollegen, die behaupten, wir h盲tten den Kampf gegen den Klimawandel bereits verloren.

Wir haben den Kampf gegen den Klimawandel nicht verloren. Wir werden ihn so lange nicht verlieren, wie wir weiterk盲mpfen. Und selbst wenn Russland sich nicht darum schert, selbst wenn China sich nicht darum schert, selbst wenn jetzt ein lustiger, oranger Mann im Wei脽en Haus sitzt, der ebenfalls behauptet, das w盲re alles nicht wahr, k枚nnen wir trotzdem hier in Europa wenigstens unsere Umwelt sch眉tzen, unser Klima sch眉tzen. Also, liebe vern眉nftige Kolleginnen und Kollegen: Bitte geben Sie niemals auf!

(Fin des interventions 脿 la demande)

听听Wopke Hoekstra, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Mr President, many thanks for the questions and comments by the various Members, and particularly those who came with those supremely nuanced perspectives and solution-oriented contributions.

I think it is probably helpful to underline at least three things that might have been misunderstood. But before I move into these areas, let me once again say that indeed, this was hard fought. This was not easy. This type of international deals are never perfect. But not having a deal would have been dramatic, and I truly do think this is a significant step in the right direction.

First, let me say also because there was misunderstanding in this area why this is a significant step. It is to a large extent because of the USD听300听billion, but we all know also from our part of the world the meaning of the word leverage. And if you put 300 on the table, you do have more than a fighting chance to indeed reach the USD听1.3听trillion. That is actually essential 鈥� that does move the needle in terms of climate ambition.

Secondly, it is important to understand what was reached in terms of the contributions of those who have not yet contributed. Clearly, the logic of developed and developing is something that we in this room question in the sense that at least a significant group of countries made huge steps forward in terms of their wealth, their affluence, and we feel that they have the responsibility to contribute to the solution. It was never in the making that they would formally change these categorisations. But what is a huge step forward is that we managed to persuade them to voluntarily contribute to the solution, and many of them said that they will indeed do so.

By the way, the nature of any type of these arrangements is voluntary. There's no legal way to make sure that countries live up to them: it is a commitment, it is a diplomatic commitment that, of course, we first of all, should acknowledge and respect.

Thirdly, I do want to articulate to those who suggest that this is a huge amount of money, that this is the end of our economy and also suggest that, you know, all sorts of ministers have made all sorts of wide-ranging commitments: please truly look at the various budgetary implications. The number we are talking about is a 2035 number. There is no allocation key, so it is up to Member States to decide. Many of our Member States, by the way, do a lot because Europe pays for one third of international climate ambitions. But it is in particular an invitation to other developed, and certainly also other developing, countries to join and become part of the solution space even more.

A couple of our Member States have articulated that they indeed do want to step up and do want to do more, but that is up to Member States. As I've said before, a large chunk of this money is brought in by the MDBs, the development banks. Why is that relevant? Well, because that means that many of our Member States allocate capital, but it is something else than a cash out. So I do think those who have been critical about the money being too much or that it would be unfairly spent, given the positions of Member States that the reality truly is different.

I hope that this helps. I very much agree with all those who have articulated, once again, the tremendous importance of following science 鈥� that is at the very heart of this. That is why we do this. It is not an opinion. It is not something that we just pursue for whatever fancy reason, it is a necessity. It will continue to be a necessity 鈥� things are getting worse rather than better, and the cost of doing nothing will be much larger than the cost of action today.

听听Le Pr茅sident. 鈥� Nous arrivons au terme de cette discussion. Le d茅bat est clos.

D茅clarations 茅crites (article 178)

听听Nicol谩s Gonz谩lez Casares (S&D), por escrito. 鈥� La COP29, celebrada en Bak煤, ha concluido con resultados claramente insuficientes ante la magnitud de la crisis clim谩tica.

Aunque se acord贸 una nueva meta colectiva global cuantificada de movilizar 300.000 millones de d贸lares anuales para los pa铆ses en desarrollo, este compromiso sigue siendo insuficiente frente a las necesidades de las naciones m谩s vulnerables, como los peque帽os estados insulares que enfrentan amenazas existenciales.

Es crucial avanzar con medidas ambiciosas de adaptaci贸n, eliminar progresivamente los subsidios a combustibles f贸siles y fortalecer las estrategias de gesti贸n del agua y la resiliencia clim谩tica. Adem谩s, llamamos a una actualizaci贸n ambiciosa de las Contribuciones Determinadas a Nivel Nacional (NDC) antes de la COP30 para garantizar el cumplimiento de los objetivos del Acuerdo de Par铆s.

Los socialistas espa帽oles creemos firmemente que la Uni贸n Europea debe liderar con ambici贸n y determinaci贸n, no solo en la financiaci贸n clim谩tica sino tambi茅n en la promoci贸n de una transici贸n justa y sostenible. Es nuestra responsabilidad demostrar que, frente a la mayor amenaza global de nuestro tiempo, es posible actuar con rapidez y determinaci贸n, asegurando justicia clim谩tica y un futuro sostenible para todas las generaciones.

听听Javi L贸pez (S&D), por escrito. 鈥� La COP29, celebrada en Bak煤, ha concluido con resultados claramente insuficientes ante la magnitud de la crisis clim谩tica.

Aunque se acord贸 una nueva meta colectiva global cuantificada de movilizar 300.000 millones de d贸lares anuales para los pa铆ses en desarrollo, este compromiso sigue siendo insuficiente frente a las necesidades de las naciones m谩s vulnerables, como los peque帽os estados insulares que enfrentan amenazas existenciales.

Es crucial avanzar con medidas ambiciosas de adaptaci贸n, eliminar progresivamente los subsidios a combustibles f贸siles y fortalecer las estrategias de gesti贸n del agua y la resiliencia clim谩tica. Adem谩s, llamamos a una actualizaci贸n ambiciosa de las Contribuciones Determinadas a Nivel Nacional (NDC) antes de la COP30 para garantizar el cumplimiento de los objetivos del Acuerdo de Par铆s.

Los socialistas espa帽oles creemos firmemente que la Uni贸n Europea debe liderar con ambici贸n y determinaci贸n, no solo en la financiaci贸n clim谩tica sino tambi茅n en la promoci贸n de una transici贸n justa y sostenible. Es nuestra responsabilidad demostrar que, frente a la mayor amenaza global de nuestro tiempo, es posible actuar con rapidez y determinaci贸n, asegurando justicia clim谩tica y un futuro sostenible para todas las generaciones.

听听Sebastian Tynkkynen (ECR), in writing. 鈥� 300 billion dollars each year by 2035.

That鈥檚 how much money will be ripped off from European and other developed countries as a result of the Climate Conference.

For what? For funding climate work in Africa for instance.

Europe accounts for only eight percent of the global emissions. However, we are told to pay up, while China and India only keep polluting more and more.

Once again, we have been fooled.

And one thing I cannot understand: how can we agree on financing other countries鈥� climate goals with these astronomical sums, and at the same time have troubles finding the resources needed to defend our own continent?

So let鈥檚 not be fools anymore and let鈥檚 put our priorities in order. For us Europe must come first.