合法博彩网站

听听Predsedaj煤ci . 鈥� 膸al拧铆m bodom programu je vyhl谩senie Komisie o potrebe prija钮 ambici贸znu medzin谩rodn煤 pr谩vne z谩v盲zn煤 dohodu o zne膷isten铆 plastmi, a to aj v morskom prostred铆 ().

听听Helena Dalli, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Mr President, good afternoon, honourable Members, the last round of the plastics negotiation is one of the most important international events of the year. Colleagues from the Commission and the Member States are in South Korea to finish the deal as we speak.

The stakes couldn't be higher. Plastic pollution is one of the world's most pressing environmental crises, and it requires immediate, concrete and decisive action from the global community. Business as usual is not an option. We have a clear and unwavering commitment to the mandate set forth by the United Nations Environment Assembly in 2022 to conclude negotiations by the end of this year.

INC-5 represents a unique opportunity for the international community to take immediate, concrete and decisive action. We feel prepared, and while the road to get here has been challenging, we are optimistic about our chances of success. That said, we also acknowledge, of course, that there are significant risks and challenges ahead. The outcome of these negotiations is far from certain.

I shall now provide a brief overview of the ongoing process. I am informed by colleagues on the ground that negotiators are engaging on a new version of the treaty text developed by the INC Chair, Ambassador Luis Vayas Valdivieso. While we appreciate the Chair's efforts to simplify the complicated text we have from INC-4 it is at the same time clear to us that his text falls short of where we need to be. To make real progress, we must raise ambition. Time is short and discussions do not seem to be moving at a pace that could lead us to the desired outcome on Sunday. We made that very clear to the Chair over the past few days: the pace needs to change if we are aiming for a conclusion.

But to reach a conclusion, there are also critical areas where we must first do more, like product design, chemicals of concern and problematic plastics. Another vital element that seems to be almost missing from the text is the extended producer responsibility. The 'polluter pays' principle is extremely important for us to be reflected in the future treaty, and EPR is one way of operationalising it.

We also need the instrument to address the unsustainable levels of primary plastic production, as it is clearly linked to the amount of plastic pollution. This is a highly sensitive and politically charged area, but it is essential that the treaty reflects the urgency of tackling plastic production at its source.

One of the most complex and challenging aspects of these negotiations will, however, be to agree on an acceptable financing structure. How do we ensure the effective mobilisation of resources, the necessary capacity building? This is a core area of negotiation, and the Chair听has left it open for the INC to reach a compromise. There are many divergent views and we have over the past months explored and tried to identify necessary landing zones where compromises can be made.

I thank the EU Member States for the efforts to find a compromise and this 合法博彩网站 for your support. Many of our partners have prepared similarly, which shows a commitment to this process. We are also doing our utmost to make progress by bridging positions and urging the Chair to take difficult decisions. It is, however, important that we do not compromise for a too high price. We need a plastics treaty that is effective and that brings us forward, if we are serious about addressing the harmful consequences for humanity, human health, the environment, ecosystems and the climate of the increasing leakage of plastic into rivers and oceans.

Although time is not on our side, the EU stands ready to work and to deliver a robust global treaty that addresses the root causes of plastic pollution. Now is our chance.

听听Francisco Jos茅 Mill谩n Mon, en nombre del Grupo PPE. 鈥� Se帽or presidente, se帽ora comisaria, le doy las gracias por la informaci贸n facilitada sobre el proyecto de Acuerdo de las Naciones Unidas en materia de pl谩sticos que se est谩 negociando ahora en Corea, en Bus谩n.

La contaminaci贸n por pl谩sticos es uno de los principales problemas del medio ambiente y, en especial, del medio marino. Es esencial que seamos ambiciosos en esta negociaci贸n. Yo soy miembro de la Comisi贸n de Pesca y soy consciente de la importancia de unos oc茅anos limpios, pues son los pescadores los que m谩s sufren por la contaminaci贸n del mar.

Me voy a detener en los micropl谩sticos, que deben ocupar un lugar importante en la negociaci贸n de Bus谩n. El transporte mar铆timo de pl谩sticos debe ser regulado de una manera m谩s estricta para evitar los vertidos de granzas de pl谩stico o p茅lets. A nivel europeo todos estamos haciendo progresos. Como saben, el Parlamento fij贸 en abril su Posici贸n sobre la propuesta de Reglamento relativo a la prevenci贸n de las p茅rdidas de granza de pl谩stico e incluimos el tr谩fico mar铆timo en nuestra Posici贸n. Yo espero que el Consejo pronto concluya sus trabajos y que se inicien las negociaciones interinstitucionales cuanto antes.

Pero todos sabemos que las negociaciones europeas no son suficientes. Debemos implicar a toda la comunidad internacional y alcanzar tambi茅n una regulaci贸n global. Por eso, hay que trabajar firmemente en el marco de este Acuerdo de las Naciones Unidas, como tambi茅n en el seno de la Organizaci贸n Mar铆tima Internacional (OMI). En la OMI necesitamos normas vinculantes m谩s estrictas en materia de p茅lets, como el uso de embalajes de alta resistencia y procedimientos de estiba bajo cubierta en todos los casos.

Termino con dos preguntas, se帽ora comisaria: 驴qu茅 lugar ocupa la contaminaci贸n por granzas de pl谩stico en las negociaciones de Bus谩n? Y, en segundo lugar, 驴qu茅 avances estamos impulsando en esta materia como Uni贸n Europea en la OMI? 驴Qu茅 estamos haciendo en el seno de la OMI? Es otra pregunta importante.

听听Thomas Bajada, on behalf of the S&D Group. 鈥� Mr President, plastic is everywhere: it is in the food we eat, the water we drink and the seas that once symbolized freedom and purity. The world is drowning in plastic,听and we are running out of time to act.

I just had lunch before this debate,听and I can鈥檛 even be sure if what I ate is free from plastic.听Every single day,听the equivalent of 2.000听truckloads of plastic waste is dumped into the ocean.听By 2050, our ocean could have more plastic than fish. That is where we are at, right now. Think about that for a moment.

It is not just about visible litter, it is about invisible poison. It is about the toxic chemicals听leaching into our soils, our ocean and yes, our bloodstreams. It is also about the carbon emissions听from plastic production,听which today are even higher than those of aviation. We must take tangible action now: the Global Plastic Treaty, which is being negotiated right now in South Korea, is our chance to turn the tide.

This is not just a meeting, it is our world鈥檚 defining moment. But it can only be so if we take bold action with tangible action. We need ambitious, legally binding targets to cut plastic production.听We need to end single-use plastics globally,听ban harmful chemicals听and hold accountable those who profit from this crisis and I call on those few states听blocking this from happening听to be ambitious听and think about our common future and that of generations to come.

And yes, a one-size-fits-all approach will not work, but I believe that good governance and sustainable mechanisms must guide this treaty. We must ensure equal access to alternatives and avoid creating additional burdens on our consumers and businesses, particularly our SMEs. An upstream approach is critical, addressing the entire lifecycle of plastics, from production, to use, to its disposal. And as you said, dear Commissioner, by focusing on product design and linking production with pollution, we can prevent waste before it even happens, and we can only do this together and for everyone. A just transition must ensure that no one is left behind: from waste pickers, that collect around 60听% of recycled plastic,听to the impacted communities听bearing the burden of our waste听and our activists fighting the good fight,听such as the Maltese swimmer Neil Agius, who is beating plastic one stroke at the time.

This is not a European problem, this is a global crisis, but Europe has the power to lead and we have shown听that bold action on climate is possible.听Colleagues, this is not just about protecting our ocean,听it is not about cleaning up our beaches, it is about protecting our future, our health, our humanity. Let us fight for a global treaty that does not just manage plastic pollution,听but ends it.

听听France Jamet, au nom du groupe PfE. 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, Madame la Commissaire, mes chers coll猫gues, il est bon que les n茅gociations sur un trait茅 international 茅difiant des objectifs contraignants sur la pollution par le plastique soient aujourd'hui sur le point d'aboutir. Tout cela semblerait aller dans le bon sens. Cependant, ce texte aura-t-il au final r茅ellement un impact? Car, si tout le monde semble avoir pris la mesure des cons茅quences de cette catastrophe, est-ce que tout le monde est r茅ellement et sinc猫rement pr锚t 脿 aborder le probl猫me sur le fond, sans clivage?

Oui, 80听% de la pollution plastique du milieu maritime est issue des pays d'Asie du Sud et de la Chine, mais peut-on enfin dire qu'il en va aussi de la responsabilit茅 des pays occidentaux? Car, apr猫s tout, qui a promu le mondialisme? Qui a d茅localis茅 nos usines dans ces pays? Sacrifiant nos emplois et d茅truisant notre 茅conomie? C'est l'Union europ茅enne.

En s'appuyant sur des r茅glementations abusives, l'Union europ茅enne a tout simplement d茅truit notre industrie, notre agriculture, notre p锚che et d茅plac茅 la pollution ailleurs. Car, enfin, qui a voulu utiliser ces pays comme des d茅charges 脿 ciel ouvert? L'Union europ茅enne. Entre听2004 et听2024, les exportations des d茅chets de l'Union vers les pays tiers ont augment茅 de 72听%. Les exportations de d茅chets!

Alors certains ici peuvent se fendre de grandes d茅clarations sur l'urgence climatique, la biodiversit茅, la catastrophe 茅cologique, mais la r茅alit茅 est l脿. C'est vous. C'est vous, europ茅istes b茅ats, qui avez promu ce mod猫le ultralib茅ral qui nous met dans cette situation calamiteuse.

芦Quand le sage montre la lune, l'imb茅cile regarde le doigt禄: c'est un proverbe chinois. Nous ne serons pas les idiots utiles. Alors si cette maigre initiative est toujours 脿 prendre, n'oublions pas qu'il n'est pas question seulement d'objectifs juridiques contraignants, qui ont peu de chance, finalement, de prosp茅rer tant que vous n'aurez pas chang茅 de paradigme. Il faut changer cette politique nomadiste et mortif猫re que les peuples d'Europe ont massivement rejet茅e derni猫rement.

La cl茅 du probl猫me est simple, c'est le localisme, c'est le r茅-enracinement, c'est la relocalisation de nos productions, c'est le respect des nations du Sud, c'est le respect de toutes les nations, c'est le respect des peuples.

听听Michael McNamara, on behalf of the Renew Group. 鈥� Mr President, colleagues, plastic pollution is one of the most visible manifestations of humanity's destruction of the planet that we see. It is also something that profoundly frightens me. To walk on Spanish Point Beach with my little children when the tide goes out, and to pick up pieces of plastic and put them away, I'm struck by how different it was to when I was a child, and how different it will be when they're adults if they get to bring their children out to that beach, because plastic production is increasing exponentially. We produce approximately 460听million听tonnes of plastic in the world annually, and that production is set to triple by 2060 with current productions.

Yes, recycling of plastic is hugely important 鈥� we currently recycle only a third of the plastic produced 鈥� but recycling isn't enough. We have to reduce the production of plastic. If you look at those who developed plastic and interviews with them and their hopes for it, it's really instrumental because they saw it as an environmental benefit that we wouldn't have to cut down trees, but they never imagined that plastic would be produced for single-use materials. They imagined that it would be something that could be used and reused, rather than this single-use plastic, which we must combat.

In my own constituency, plastic pollution and litter is a huge problem along the Clare coast. Lahinch, Doolin and even Mountshannon, which is inland, are cited by An Taisce for plastic pollution. Ireland is the highest producer of plastic waste per person in the European Union, 65听kg a year per person, twice the EU average. Most of the EU's plastic is burned and, as I said, less than a third is recycled.

So I think it is very important that we conclude the Global Plastic Treaty this week. But, Commissioner, I share your reservations about it 鈥� we do need to go further, but we do need to at least start combating this. Because, as I said, I talked about my aesthetic sensibilities in picking up plastic 鈥� that, of course, is irrelevant compared to the impact it is having on habitats and the many species that rely on not having to survive amid plastic for their future. So it is, as I say, something that I hope the European Union can work on and support, but also develop further because there are many weaknesses in what is proposed. But it is at least a start.

听听Isabella L枚vin, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group. 鈥� Mr President, microplastics are now found everywhere on our planet, deep in the ocean, but also in humans' bloodstream, breast milk, placental tissue, lungs and brain. Every year, hundreds of millions of tonnes of new plastics are being produced, while only 9听% is recycled, and the production is estimated to triple by 2060. So we will have new mountains of plastic products where two thirds are just used once or thrown away within 5 years. This is a lifestyle that this planet simply cannot afford.

So the EU must push hard to get a globally binding agreement in Busan to end plastic pollution but also stem the flood of new plastics at its sources. We know the 1.5鈥慸egree climate goal cannot be achieved without a sharp reduction in the production of primary plastic polymers, since these are made of petroleum. We know our oceans will suffocate with plastics if we don't achieve management and recycling of plastic waste in all countries, including in the Global South, where producers also have responsibility. And we know our children will suffer if we don't ban hazardous chemicals contained in plastic products.

Final point, I hear that the same countries that were obstructing during the climate negotiations last week in Baku are now creating problems in Busan. Oil鈥憄roducing countries 鈥� Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iran 鈥� trying to safeguard their future markets, I just have one thing to say: shame on you.

听听螡喂魏蠈位伪蟼 桅伪蟻伪谓蟿慰蠉蟻畏蟼, 蔚尉 慰谓蠈渭伪蟿慰蟼 蟿畏蟼 慰渭维未伪蟼 The Left. 鈥� 螝蠉蟻喂蔚 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 蟿喂 蔚委谓伪喂 伪蠀蟿蠈 蟺慰蠀 未喂伪蠁慰蟻慰蟺慰喂蔚委 蟿畏谓 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 螆谓蠅蟽畏 伪蟺蠈 维位位蔚蟼 蠂蠋蟻蔚蟼 蟿慰蠀 蟺位伪谓萎蟿畏, 伪蟺蠈 维位位伪 慰渭慰蟽蟺慰谓未喂伪魏维 魏蟻维蟿畏, 伪蟺蠈 维位位慰蠀蟼 未喂蔚胃谓蔚委蟼 慰蟻纬伪谓喂蟽渭慰蠉蟼; 螤慰喂伪 蔚委谓伪喂, 蔚谓未蔚蠂慰渭苇谓蠅蟼, 畏 蟺喂慰 蔚渭尾位畏渭伪蟿喂魏萎 蟺伪蟻苇渭尾伪蟽萎 蟿畏蟼 蟽蟿伪 味畏蟿萎渭伪蟿伪 蟿畏蟼 伪谓胃蟻蠅蟺蠈蟿畏蟿伪蟼 魏伪喂 蟿慰蠀 蟺位伪谓萎蟿畏 蟽萎渭蔚蟻伪; 螚 蟺蟻慰蟽蟿伪蟽委伪 蟿慰蠀 蟺蔚蟻喂尾维位位慰谓蟿慰蟼, 蟿蠅谓 蔚蟺蠈渭蔚谓蠅谓 纬蔚谓喂蠋谓, 蟿慰蠀 蟺位伪谓萎蟿畏. 螚 蟺蟻慰蟽蟿伪蟽委伪 伪蠀蟿慰蠉 蟺慰蠀 蔚委谓伪喂 伪蠀蟿慰谓蠈畏蟿畏 蟺蟻慰蠇蟺蠈胃蔚蟽畏 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 蠉蟺伪蟻尉萎 渭伪蟼.

惟蟼 渭苇位慰蟼 蟿畏蟼 螘蟺喂蟿蟻慰蟺萎蟼 螤蔚蟻喂尾维位位慰谓蟿慰蟼, 蔚委蠂伪 蟿畏谓 蔚蠀魏伪喂蟻委伪 谓伪 蟺伪蟻伪魏慰位慰蠀胃萎蟽蠅 伪蟺蠈 魏慰谓蟿维 魏伪喂 蟿喂蟼 蔚蟻纬伪蟽委蔚蟼 蟽蟿慰 螠蟺伪魏慰蠉 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 魏位喂渭伪蟿喂魏萎 魏蟻委蟽畏, 蟿慰 COP29. 韦伪 伪蟺慰蟿蔚位苇蟽渭伪蟿伪 未蔚谓 蔚委谓伪喂 喂魏伪谓慰蟺慰喂畏蟿喂魏维, 未喂蠈蟿喂 未蔚谓 蠀蟺维蟻蠂蔚喂 未苇蟽渭蔚蠀蟽畏 慰蠉蟿蔚 纬喂伪 蠂蟻畏渭伪蟿慰未蠈蟿畏蟽畏 慰蠉蟿蔚 纬喂伪 蟿伪 蔚蟺蠈渭蔚谓伪 尾萎渭伪蟿伪 蟿蠅谓 伪谓蔚蟺蟿蠀纬渭苇谓蠅谓 蠂蠅蟻蠋谓 纬喂伪 苇谓伪谓 魏伪胃伪蟻蠈蟿蔚蟻慰 蟺位伪谓萎蟿畏. 螘未蠋, 位慰喂蟺蠈谓, 蟽萎渭蔚蟻伪 蟺慰蠀 渭喂位维渭蔚, 伪蠀蟿萎 蟿畏 蟽蟿喂纬渭萎, 蟽蟿慰 螠蟺慰蠀蟽维谓 蟿畏蟼 螝慰蟻苇伪蟼 蟽蠀谓蔚蠂委味慰谓蟿伪喂 慰喂 未喂伪蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿蔚蠉蟽蔚喂蟼 纬喂伪 渭委伪 未喂蔚胃谓萎 蟽蠀渭蠁蠅谓委伪 纬喂伪 蟿伪 蟺位伪蟽蟿喂魏维 蠀蟺蠈 蟿畏谓 伪喂纬委未伪 蟿慰蠀 螣蟻纬伪谓喂蟽渭慰蠉 螚谓蠅渭苇谓蠅谓 螘胃谓蠋谓, 魏伪喂 畏 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 螆谓蠅蟽畏 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 蟺蟻蠅蟿慰蟽蟿伪蟿萎蟽蔚喂.

K维谓蠅 苇魏魏位畏蟽畏 蟺蟻慰蟼 蟿畏谓 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 螘蟺喂蟿蟻慰蟺萎 谓伪 蟺伪蟻伪渭蔚委谓蔚喂 蟽蟿伪胃蔚蟻萎 魏伪喂 蟺蟻慰蟽畏位蠅渭苇谓畏 蟽蟿慰谓 蟽蟿蠈蠂慰 蟿畏蟼 渭蔚委蠅蟽畏蟼 蟿蠅谓 蟺位伪蟽蟿喂魏蠋谓 鈥撓屜囄� 伪蟺位维 蟿畏蟼 伪蠉尉畏蟽畏蟼 蟿畏蟼 伪谓伪魏蠉魏位蠅蟽畏蟼, 伪位位维 蟿畏蟼 渭蔚委蠅蟽畏蟼 蟺伪蟻伪纬蠅纬萎蟼 蟿蠅谓 蟺位伪蟽蟿喂魏蠋谓, 畏 慰蟺慰委伪 蔚委谓伪喂 伪蟺慰纬慰畏蟿蔚蠀蟿喂魏萎. 螒蠀尉维谓蔚蟿伪喂 渭蔚 纬蔚蠅渭蔚蟿蟻喂魏萎 蟿伪蠂蠉蟿畏蟿伪. 螤蟻蠋蟿慰谓.

螖蔚蠉蟿蔚蟻慰谓, 伪谓伪魏蠉魏位蠅蟽畏. 螠蠈谓慰 9% 蟿蠅谓 蟺位伪蟽蟿喂魏蠋谓 伪谓伪魏蠀魏位蠋谓慰谓蟿伪喂 蟺伪纬魏慰蟽渭委蠅蟼 魏维胃蔚 蠂蟻蠈谓慰. 螤蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 未喂蟺位伪蟽喂伪蟽蟿蔚委 魏伪喂 谓伪 蟿蟻喂蟺位伪蟽喂伪蟽蟿蔚委 维渭蔚蟽伪 伪蠀蟿蠈 蟿慰 谓慰蠉渭蔚蟻慰.

韦蟻委蟿慰谓, 谓伪 渭畏谓 蔚蟺喂蟿蟻苇蠄慰蠀渭蔚 蟽蔚 蠈位蔚蟼 伪蠀蟿苇蟼 蟿喂蟼 蔚蟿伪喂蟻蔚委蔚蟼-位蠈渭蟺喂 蟺慰蠀 伪蠀蟿萎 蟿畏 蟽蟿喂纬渭萎 苇蠂慰蠀谓 魏伪蟿伪魏位蠉蟽蔚喂 蟿喂蟼 蔚蟻纬伪蟽委蔚蟼 蟿畏蟼 蟺伪纬魏蠈蟽渭喂伪蟼 蟽蠀谓未喂维蟽魏蔚蠄畏蟼 蟽蟿畏 螡蠈蟿喂伪 螝慰蟻苇伪, 蟽蟿慰 螠蟺慰蠀蟽维谓, 220 蟿慰谓 伪蟻喂胃渭蠈 鈥撐� 渭蔚纬伪位蠉蟿蔚蟻慰蟼 伪蟻喂胃渭蠈蟼 蔚蟿伪喂蟻蔚喂蠋谓 慰蟻蠀魏蟿蠋谓 魏伪喂 蟺位伪蟽蟿喂魏蠋谓 蟺慰蠀 蔚渭蠁伪谓委蟽蟿畏魏蔚 蟺慰蟿苇 蟽蔚 蟿苇蟿慰喂伪 未喂蔚胃谓萎 蟽蠀谓未喂维蟽魏蔚蠄畏鈥� 谓伪 魏伪胃喂蔚蟻蠋蟽慰蠀谓 蟿畏谓 伪蟿味苇谓蟿伪 蟿慰蠀蟼.

螘未蠋 魏伪喂 蟿蠋蟻伪 蠂蟻蔚喂伪味蠈渭伪蟽蟿蔚 蟺伪纬魏蠈蟽渭喂慰蠀蟼 魏伪谓蠈谓蔚蟼, 谓慰渭喂魏维 未蔚蟽渭蔚蠀蟿喂魏慰蠉蟼 纬喂伪 蠈位慰蠀蟼, 魏蠀蟻委蠅蟼 纬喂伪 蟿喂蟼 伪谓蔚蟺蟿蠀纬渭苇谓蔚蟼 伪位位维 魏伪喂 蟿喂蟼 伪谓伪蟺蟿蠀蟽蟽蠈渭蔚谓蔚蟼 蠂蠋蟻蔚蟼. 螤蟻蠋蟿慰谓, 纬喂伪 渭蔚委蠅蟽畏 蟿蠅谓 蟺位伪蟽蟿喂魏蠋谓. 螝伪喂, 未蔚蠉蟿蔚蟻慰谓, 纬喂伪 伪蠉尉畏蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 伪谓伪魏蠉魏位蠅蟽畏蟼.

听听Siegbert Frank Droese, im Namen der ESN-Fraktion. 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, Frau Kommissarin! Niemand bestreitet, dass die Umweltverschmutzung in Ozeanen und Meeren ein gro脽es Problem darstellt. Gerade Plastikm眉ll ist besonders relevant. Die L枚sung der EU鈥慐inwegplastikrichtlinie und anderer Vorschl盲ge lautet nun: verbieten. Verbot von Plastikt眉ten, Verbot von Strohhalmen 鈥� Hauptsache verbieten. Den Takt f眉r diese Verbotsorgien bestimmen dabei in der Regel NGOs. Sie reden permanent von CO2鈥慒u脽abdr眉cken, 鈥慠ucks盲cken, Rohstoffrucks盲cken und nat眉rlich von den UN鈥慛achhaltigkeitszielen. Die besonderen Eiferer fordern M眉llbanken oder sehen einen direkten Zusammenhang von weniger Plastik und weniger Armut.

Seltsamerweise h枚rt man nie etwas 眉ber die Verursacher von Plastikm眉ll in den Meeren. Am Pranger stehen immer bestimmte L盲nder, aber eben nicht konkret der Verursacher. Wenn ein Schiffskapit盲n vors盲tzlich Plastik im Meer entsorgt, und es wird ihm nachgewiesen, dann sollte er daf眉r hart bestraft werden. Aber die Plastikt眉te an sich oder der Luftballon oder das Wattest盲bchen am Strand sind nicht schuld.

Es gibt ja erstklassige Beispiele, wo Recycling von M眉ll funktioniert 鈥� ohne staatliche Einwirkung. Die M眉llabfuhr in Kairo mit mehr als 20听Millionen Einwohnern wird weitgehend in einer Art Selbstverwaltung von privaten Firmen, findigen Einzelunternehmern organisiert, die die Lage vor Ort kennen und die Probleme l枚sen. 脛hnliches h枚rt man aus Indien.

Wenn heute gesagt wird, die Ostsee sei das dreckigste Meer der Welt, so m眉ssen die einzelnen Verursacher zur Verantwortung gezogen werden. Diese ganze EU鈥慥erbotskultur f眉hrt hier eben nicht zwangsl盲ufig zur Verbesserung. Das Ziel, die Meere und Fische vor Plastikm眉ll zu sch眉tzen, ist nat眉rlich richtig听鈥� hatte ich ja gesagt. Aber die ideologische Aufbauschung und ma脽lose 脺bertreibung durch zumeist gr眉ne NGOs sind hier eben nicht zielf眉hrend. So behaupten einfach ein paar irre gr眉ne Aktivisten, 2050 gibt es mehr T眉ten als Fische in den Meeren. Ja, und besonders gef盲hrdet sei der Tiefsee-Flohkrebs.

Im Ernst: Wo ist die Frage, frage ich mich? Hier ist eigentlich der kreative Ansatz dieser EU. Wenn Plastik so gef盲hrlich ist, warum investiert man nicht in Forschung, um andere Materialien f眉r Verpackungen zu entwickeln? Zusammengefasst: Verursacher von Umweltverschmutzung unserer Ozeane und Meere hart bestrafen, aber nicht die europ盲ische Wirtschaft mit immer mehr B眉rokratie g盲ngeln und die Verbraucher mit immer neuen Vorschriften nerven.

听听Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral (PPE). 鈥� Senhor Presidente, Senhora Comiss谩ria, cerca de 11 milh玫es de toneladas de res铆duos de pl谩sticos e micropl谩sticos fluem anualmente para os oceanos, contaminando as nossas costas e locais de mergulho, sendo estes uma das maiores amea莽as 脿 conserva莽茫o da biodiversidade e dos ecossistemas marinhos oce芒nicos. E todos recordamos a mar茅 de p茅letes que deu 脿 nossa costa recentemente. Mais de 800 esp茅cies marinhas e costeiras s茫o afetadas por esta polui莽茫o atrav茅s da ingest茫o e emaranhamento, mas tamb茅m pode ser afetado o ser humano, uma vez que a sua exposi莽茫o pode prejudicar a sua sa煤de.

Em Portugal, adotamos recentemente o Plano de A莽茫o Nacional para o Lixo Marinho e consta do nosso manifesto eleitoral a cria莽茫o do Observat贸rio do Lixo Marinho, que resulta de sinergias com diversas organiza莽玫es n茫o governamentais do ambiente, que t锚m feito um trabalho fant谩stico na defesa do nosso oceano e zonas costeiras.

Mas tamb茅m sa煤do a colabora莽茫o e empenho dos pescadores e operadores mar铆timos, que muitas vezes pescam literalmente pl谩sticos, ajudando a limpar o nosso oceano Atl芒ntico e salvando muitas das nossas esp茅cies marinhas. Temos de apostar na redu莽茫o, reutiliza莽茫o e reciclagem dos pl谩sticos, na coopera莽茫o internacional, neste que 茅 um esfor莽o coletivo que deve ter metas obrigat贸rias e ambiciosas, envolvendo os pr贸prios produtores de pol铆meros de pl谩stico, que devem financiar a sua recolha e tamb茅m ser responsabilizados pela sua utiliza莽茫o e transporte.

(O orador aceita responder a uma pergunta 芦cart茫o azul禄)

听听Petras Gra啪ulis (ESN), pak臈lus m臈lyn膮j膮 kortel臋 pateiktas klausimas. 鈥� Nor臈膷iau J奴s懦 paklausti kaip valdan膷iosios partijos atstov膮. Kalbant, girdint diskusijas, man atrodo, kad J奴s kovojate tik su pasekm臈mis, bet su prie啪astimi nekovojate. J奴s pats, matyt, ne kart膮 mat臈t, kai nori nusipirkti menkniek寞 ka啪kok寞 nedidel寞 鈥� ar tai USB, ar k膮, jis ma啪ytis daiktas, o supakuotas 寞 de拧imt kart懦 didesn臋 pakuot臋. Kod臈l tos problemos nekeliat, kad ma啪esn臈se pakuot臈se b奴t懦 pakuojami visi gaminami daiktai?

听听Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral (PPE), Resposta segundo o procedimento 芦cart茫o azul禄. 鈥� Sim, nada a opor, a quest茫o aqui 茅 que eu venho de uma regi茫o ultraperif茅rica, de uma regi茫o oce芒nica, dos A莽ores, e n贸s l谩 sofremos bem aquilo que 茅 o impacto dos pl谩sticos e dos micropl谩sticos. Temos os nossos locais de mergulho amea莽ados. Temos tamb茅m aqui o pl谩stico que deriva e que flutua com as correntes, que afeta a nossa pr贸pria biodiversidade.听E por isso, mais do que tamb茅m falar aqui das consequ锚ncias, falo tamb茅m das causas e, como 茅 贸bvio, 茅 por isso 茅 que destaquei aqui, na minha interven莽茫o, a necessidade de envolver toda a fileira, todos os setores, desde logo tamb茅m os pr贸prios produtores, em solu莽玫es que sejam obviamente adequadas 脿 nossa necessidade.

听听Rasmus Nordqvist (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Mr听President, yes, plastic is everywhere, as we've heard many speakers before me saying. I mean, it's in the supermarket, our homes, look in your bags 鈥� it's everywhere. We even wear it. And then sometimes we feel good because we see it's recycled, but much too often it's downcycled and therefore it ends up again in landfills and in the oceans.

What is so important with this treaty and with the negotiations from the EU side is that we follow the High Ambition Coalition and actually put a high reduction target on production of new plastic. Because we can talk about recycling, but if we continue with the use we have right now, we are in a deep mess. And yes, we should be willing to find compromise with people, but we shouldn't be compromised in this question. I mean, we owe it to the coming generations, to nature, the animals and the oceans to actually stand firm on this and also to be a first mover, not only wait for the others.

听听Niels Geuking (PPE). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, Frau Kommissarin! Eigentlich war es schon egal, was in Korea letztlich beschlossen wird. Zur Debatte geh枚rt n盲mlich vor allem: Wer produziert denn den ganzen Dreck? Und da sind wir Europ盲er leider vorne mit dabei. Wir lassen dank der globalisierten Gesch盲ftsmodelle in der Welt unter niedrigsten Standards f眉r unseren Heimatmarkt produzieren und lagern damit viele Umweltprobleme aktiv aus. Wir sind gr眉n, andere werden dadurch dreckiger. Und dann exportieren wir unseren M眉ll auch noch 鈥� wir haben es hier vielfach schon geh枚rt 鈥�, den wir nicht mehr recyceln k枚nnen oder auch wirtschaftlich vielleicht gar nicht wollen, in die Welt, allen voran nach Asien.

Als Mitglied im Entwicklungsausschuss kann ich das nur verurteilen. Bei aller internationaler Bem眉hung, wir m眉ssen auch vor der eigenen Haust眉r kehren und den M眉ll erstens in der Produktion weitestgehend durch vern眉nftige Ersatzprodukte, die abbaubar sind, ersetzen, wo wir es k枚nnen. Und zweitens m眉ssen wir innerhalb einer funktionierenden Kreislaufwirtschaft effektiv verwerten, und zwar zur Not auch thermisch. Denn es ist wesentlich sinniger, unseren M眉ll dann in M眉llverbrennungsanlagen noch in Strom und W盲rme umzuwandeln, als ihn mit dreckigem Schwer枚l um die Welt zu schiffen. Insofern: Das Verursacherprinzip muss beim M眉ll ma脽gebend sein.

Vyst煤penia na z谩klade prihl谩senia sa o slovo zdvihnut铆m ruky

听听Bogdan Rzo艅ca (ECR). 鈥� Panie Przewodnicz膮cy! To naprawd臋 wa偶na debata, wa偶ny problem. Absolutnie zgadzam si臋 z tym, 偶e trzeba o tym rozmawia膰. Plastik nie istnia艂 zawsze, wybuch popularno艣ci plastiku nast膮pi艂 gdzie艣 w latach 50. ubieg艂ego wieku i od tego czasu plastik przybiera r贸偶ne formy i jest u偶ywany w naszym 偶yciu spo艂ecznym, prywatnym, przemys艂owym na r贸偶n膮 skal臋. I to na coraz wi臋ksz膮 skal臋. I dzisiaj sta艂 si臋 globalnym wynalazkiem i听globalnym problemem.

Wobec tego na kanwie tej dyskusji o plastiku zastanawiam si臋, czy tak samo gor膮co na tej sali plenarnej b臋dziemy za jaki艣 czas dyskutowa膰 o problemach z utylizacj膮 baterii fotowoltaicznych, paneli fotowoltaicznych, baterii samochodowych, ca艂ego tego przemys艂u, tak dzisiaj zachwalanego, zwi膮zanego z elektromobilno艣ci膮. Bo to te偶 b臋dzie problem i te偶 b臋dziemy musieli kt贸rego艣 dnia wprowadzi膰 podatek. Tak jak dzisiaj jest podatek od plastiku, b臋dzie podatek od elektromobilno艣ci.

听听Lukas Sieper (NI). 鈥� Mr President, dear colleagues, if you have seen me in the last half an hour, you might have realised that I was not sitting here in my place where I, unfortunately 鈥� but I respect the rules of procedure, of course 鈥� need to take this speech from.听I was sitting down there with my colleagues from the Greens, and this is not only because me and my colleagues from the Greens had a nice little chat, this is intentional.

I would like to express that I am happy that in this debate we have seen a lot of people catching up talking points that the Greens have already made 20 years ago. But we should maybe now, in this time of environmental crisis, of climate change, listen to them a little bit more, even if we are not part of their team. Because if we don't do it now, we have to listen to them even more in 20 years.

So let's work together, let's save our climate, let's save our planet, and I wish you all a pleasant weekend.

(Koniec vyst煤pen铆 na z谩klade prihl谩senia sa o slovo zdvihnut铆m ruky)

听听President. 鈥� Before giving the floor to Commissioner Dalli, first of all, Commissioner, let me thank you greatly for five years of service for Europe, because this is the last time you are speaking in 合法博彩网站. We really appreciate everything you have done. I wish you good luck on your future journeys and hopefully you have a relaxing break after all this!

听听Helena Dalli, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Mr President, yes indeed, this is my last address to this 合法博彩网站. I want to thank you all for the work we have done together. You have really been helpful in what we wanted to do, because I would go to the Commission and say, 'But the 合法博彩网站 want it stronger!' And so you were really a power to my elbow. I really appreciate it.

I appreciate, especially, also because you are directly linked to our citizens, to our constituents, whilst we are not. So I can never stop saying how important this 合法博彩网站 is for the Commission, for legislators, for policymakers, because you are the closest link with our electorate, with our people, with our citizens. And you know, you hear them, you know what is bothering our people, and therefore, the best thing a Commissioner can do is listen well to the parliamentarians, so thank you for your work.

And this being my last speech here, I'm going to ask you to put on your headphones 鈥� no, you don't need to put them on, Mr听Bajada! 鈥� because I'm going to speak in my language, Maltese.

President, onorevoli Membri, l-g魔an tag魔na huwa li nag魔lqu dawn in-negozjati imma mhux akkost ta' kollox. Irridu nkunu preparati g魔all-kompromessi f'Busan, imma lesti li nitilqu 'l hemm min-negozjati jekk nitilfu l-livell ta' ambizzjoni mixtieq. Irridu na魔dmu flimkien biex naslu flimkien.

L-Unjoni Ewropea u l-Istati Membri jag魔fsu fuq il-魔tie摹a tal-inklu偶joni ta' mi偶uri fuq il-mikroplastiks tul i膵-膵iklu tal-魔ajja tal-plastik. Dan g魔adu fuq il-mejda tad-diskussjoni f'Busan. L-Unjoni Ewropea tinsisti wkoll fuq l-inklu偶joni fit-trattat ta' mi偶uri ta' riduzzjoni tal-produzzjoni tal-plastic polymer primarju u tar-ri膵iklar. Nenfasizza li l-Unjoni Ewropea hija lesta biex ta魔dem u tasal g魔al trattat globali b'sa魔魔tu li jindirizza l-g魔erq tat-tni摹摹is mill-plastik. Issa huwa 膵-膵ans. Grazzi 魔afna.

听听Predsedaj煤ci . 鈥� T谩to rozprava sa skon膷ila.

P铆somn茅 vyhl谩senia (膷l谩nok 178)

听听C茅sar Luena (S&D), por escrito. 鈥� La contaminaci贸n por pl谩sticos es una amenaza global que exige una respuesta ambiciosa y jur铆dicamente vinculante. Cada a帽o, m谩s de once听millones de toneladas acaban en los oc茅anos, lo que da帽a ecosistemas, afecta a la fauna marina y pone en riesgo la seguridad alimentaria y la salud humana. Esta crisis es medioambiental y clim谩tica: si no limitamos la producci贸n de pl谩sticos 鈥攂asada mayoritariamente en combustibles f贸siles鈥� socavaremos los objetivos clim谩ticos globales.

El Tratado mundial contra la contaminaci贸n por pl谩sticos representa una oportunidad hist贸rica para frenar esta tendencia y garantizar un futuro sostenible. Es fundamental que la Uni贸n, como l铆der en la lucha contra el cambio clim谩tico y segundo mayor productor de pl谩sticos, defienda l铆mites estrictos a la producci贸n global, la eliminaci贸n de pl谩sticos de un solo uso y la regulaci贸n de sustancias qu铆micas da帽inas.

Adem谩s, debemos garantizar que las decisiones se basen en la ciencia y no en intereses industriales que perpet煤an el statu quo. El ciclo de vida completo del pl谩stico debe abordarse con firmeza, desde su producci贸n hasta su eliminaci贸n, priorizando la reutilizaci贸n y la econom铆a circular.

Los socialistas pedimos a todos los actores que demuestren compromiso multilateral y responsabilidad: el mundo no puede permitirse otro fracaso medioambiental.