合法博彩网站

听听President. 鈥� The next item is the debate on the Commission statement on cross鈥慴order recognition of civil status documents of same鈥憇ex couples and their children within the territory of the EU ().

听听Glenn Micallef, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, honourable Members, I would like to thank you for proposing a debate on the recognition of civil status documents of same鈥憇ex couples and their children within the Union.

Families, in particular rainbow families, can currently face difficulties in having their marriage or partnership or the parenthood of their children recognised in another Member State, for example, when they move to another Member State or returned to their Member State of origin.听The recognition in a Member State of civil status documents on marriage, partnerships and parenthood issued in another Member State is at the basis of the right to free movement and an essential element of the construction of a Union of equality.

The Court of Justice ruled in its 2018 judgment in the Coman case that already today Union law on free movement requires Member States to recognise, for certain purposes, civil status documents on marriage or partnerships issued in another Member State, irrespective of the sex of the spouses or partners.

This recognition obligation aims to enable Union citizens and their spouses or partners, including same鈥憇ex couples, to benefit from rights under Union law, such as the right to travel to or take up residence in another Member State, or to be treated equally in a host Member State in respect of all matters within the scope of the Treaty, even if that host Member State does not provide for same鈥憇ex marriage or same鈥憇ex partnerships.听But let me be clear: this does not require Member States to provide, in their national law, for the institution of same鈥憇ex marriage.

Similarly, the Court of Justice confirmed in its 2021 judgment in the VMA case that the Member States are already required under Union law free movement to recognise a civil status document on the parenthood of a child issued in another Member State. This recognition obligation aims to enable all children and their parents, including children with same鈥憇ex parents, to benefit from their rights under Union law, such as the right to travel to or take up residence in another Member State, and in their right to travel documentation even if the host Member State does not allow parenthood by same鈥憇ex couples.

The Commission considered that the protection of children's rights in cross鈥慴order situations should be extended, and in 2022, it adopted a proposal for a regulation that would require Member States to recognise civil status documents on parenthood issued in another Member State for all purposes.

The regulation would require Member States to recognise parenthood to enable all children to also benefit from their rights under national law, such as the right to inherit from either parent in another Member State, the right to receive financial support from either parent in another Member State, or the right to be represented by either parent in another Member State on matters such as their schooling and health.听This recognition obligation would apply irrespective of how that child was conceived or born, and irrespective of the child's type of family, therefore also applying to children with same鈥憇ex parents.

The proposal would facilitate the recognition of parenthood by harmonising the Member States' rules on private international law, that is, rules that determine which Member State's court would be competent to establish parenthood in cross鈥慴order cases, which national law would apply to establish parenthood in cross鈥慴order cases, and how judgments and public documents on parenthood issued in one Member State should be recognised in another Member State.

The proposal also provides for the creation of a European certificate on parenthood 鈥� a certificate that children or their parents could use to prove children's parenthood in another Member State.

As the proposal concerns rights going beyond rights for which recognition is already granted under Union law, the proposal had to be adopted under the Union's competence to adopt measures on family law with cross鈥慴order implications, pursuant to Article听81(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

Such measures must be adopted by the Council by a unanimous vote, after having consulted 合法博彩网站. 合法博彩网站 gave a large support to the proposal in December听2023. In the Council, the Member States are discussing the proposal's provisions constructively, and progress is gradually being made.

听听Se谩n Kelly, thar ceann an Ghr煤pa PPE. 鈥� Go raibh maith agat a Uachtar谩in agus go raibh maith agat a Choimisin茅ir, aonta铆m leat sa mh茅id a d煤irt t煤.

We are faced with a very important question. Should same sex couples and their children receive the same recognition and protection of their civil status across all EU Member States? The answer is clear: yes.

This is about ensuring equality and fairness for all families across Europe. This is not a question of ideology, but simply a question of fundamental human rights.

The European Union is founded on the principles of equality, dignity and freedom. When a same-sex couple legally marries in one Member State, or when their child is legally recognised as theirs, that legal status should not dissolve at a border. A family is a family, whether they live in Dublin, Warsaw, Madrid or Budapest.

Yet today, many same-sex couples and their children find themselves in legal limbo simply because they move between Member States. A child recognised as the legal offspring of two parents in one country may suddenly find themselves without legal guardianship in another. This is not just an inconvenience. It is a violation of their rights, creating insecurity, fear and unnecessary suffering. Worse still, this legal uncertainty directly infringes on one of the fundamental pillars of the EU: the right to free movement.

What freedom is there if crossing a border can strip away a person's legal relationship with their child? No EU citizen should have to choose between their right to live and work anywhere in the Union and the legal security of their family. Yet that is precisely the choice some families are forced to make.

This 合法博彩网站 has a duty to defend all families. EU law must guarantee that civil status documents 鈥� marriages, partnerships, birth certificates 鈥� are recognised across borders, regardless of the gender of the parents or spouses.

The European Court of Justice has already affirmed that all EU citizens, including same sex families, must be able to move freely without discrimination. Now we need our legislation to reflect this. We must ensure that legal rights are already granted by one country, are not stripped away by another. This is about legal certainty, respect for human dignity and the freedom of movement that is the heart of the of the European project.

Families should not have to fear crossing a border. Children should not lose their legal parents overnight. We have a responsibility to ensure that love, commitment and parental care are recognised and respected no matter where in the EU they exist. Let us choose the path of equality, dignity and fundamental rights.

Tugaimis, agus seasaimis suas d谩r gclann i ngach 谩it san Aontas agus aitheantas a thabhairt d贸ibh i ngach aon Bhallst谩t.

听听Krzysztof 艢miszek, w imieniu grupy S&D. 鈥� Pani Przewodnicz膮ca! Zasada wzajemnego uznawania dokument贸w mi臋dzy pa艅stwami cz艂onkowskimi. Zasada wzajemnego zaufania. Zasada r贸wno艣ci bez wzgl臋du na orientacj臋 seksualn膮. Zasada swobodnego przep艂ywu os贸b. Zasada zakazu dyskryminacji. To s膮 podstawy funkcjonowania Unii Europejskiej.

Dzisiaj powiem Pa艅stwu o sytuacjach, prawdziwych sytuacjach, w kt贸rych te zasady w Unii Europejskiej nie obowi膮zuj膮. Prawo Unii Europejskiej nie obowi膮zuje, je偶eli po sp臋dzeniu 15 pi臋knych lat ze swoim partnerem w Polsce, umiera on we W艂oszech i musisz sprowadzi膰 jego cia艂o do kraju, jak w przypadku Polak贸w - Krzysztofa i 艁ukasza. Te zasady nie istniej膮 kiedy zawierasz zwi膮zek ma艂偶e艅ski z mi艂o艣ci膮 swojego 偶ycia w Danii albo w Portugalii. W Polsce ten zwi膮zek nie ma 偶adnego znaczenia. Twoja mi艂o艣膰 w 艣wietle prawa nie istnieje, tak jak mi艂o艣膰 polskiej pisarki Renaty i jej partnerki. Tak jak mi艂o艣膰 aktywist贸w Dawida i Jakuba. Tysi膮ce polskich, s艂owackich czy rumu艅skich par jednop艂ciowych zawiera zwi膮zki ma艂偶e艅skie i wychowuje dzieci w Niemczech, w Portugalii, Holandii, Szwecji czy Hiszpanii. Kiedy podr贸偶uj膮 do Polski, Bu艂garii czy S艂owacji, ich zwi膮zki ma艂偶e艅skie ju偶 nie istniej膮 i ich rodzicielstwo w 艣wietle prawa zostaje odrzucone. Ich 偶ycia s膮 uniewa偶nione. Staj膮 si臋 niewidzialni. Staj膮 si臋 dla siebie obcymi osobami.

Podstaw膮 Unii Europejskiej jest wolno艣膰 poruszania si臋 po jej terytorium. W jaki spos贸b ta wolno艣膰 jest respektowana, je偶eli w jednym kraju jestem m臋偶em i ojcem, a w drugim nikim. Je偶eli odbiera si臋 mi moj膮 to偶samo艣膰, moj膮 mi艂o艣膰 i moj膮 rodzin臋 w momencie, kiedy wsiadam do poci膮gu w Berlinie, a wysiadam we Wroc艂awiu czy Warszawie. Artyku艂 21 Karty Praw Podstawowych zakazuje dyskryminacji ze wzgl臋du na orientacj臋 seksualn膮. Czy na pewno tak jest w Unii Europejskiej? Panie Komisarzu, czas zako艅czy膰 t臋 jawn膮 dyskryminacj臋. Czas na dzia艂anie Unii Europejskiej i Komisji Europejskiej.

听听Paolo Inselvini, a nome del gruppo ECR. 鈥� Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, signor Commissario, i bambini, la parte pi霉 fragile, coloro che hanno bisogno di protezione pi霉 di tutti, devono avere la priorit脿. Questo in generale, ma anche e soprattutto per il dibattito odierno. Siamo tutti d'accordo, credo e spero, su questo aspetto.

E allora perch茅 qualcuno vuole sacrificare i diritti dei pi霉 piccoli sull'altare dell'ideologia? Perch茅 si vuole esaudire a tutti i costi i desideri, pi霉 o meno legittimi, degli adulti? I bambini hanno il diritto ad avere un padre e una madre. Non perch茅 lo decidiamo noi, brutti e cattivi, non perch茅 lo decide uno Stato, ma perch茅 cos矛 猫, senza alcuna possibilit脿 di smentita.

Avere dei bambini, invece, non 猫 un diritto. Avere dei figli non 猫 un diritto che pu貌 essere esaudito a tutti i costi. Questo semplicemente, perch茅 le persone non sono delle cose.

Ecco perch茅 mi sorge un dubbio. Evidentemente, la discussione di oggi 猫 fatta per ingannare. 脠 un inganno: un inganno da parte di chi vuole legittimare la barbara pratica dell'utero in affitto, ossia la mercificazione della donna, dei bambini e della vita.

E se questo 猫 il vostro obiettivo, bene, sappiate che ci troverete pronti alle barricate. Saremo l'argine che fermer脿 la vostra furiosa marea ideologica. Non smetteremo mai di ribadirlo: i bambini possono nascere solo da un padre e una madre, solo da un uomo e da una donna. Ed 猫 assurdo dover sempre ricordare ci貌 che 猫 ovvio. Ma se ci costringerete, noi lo riaffermeremo ogni giorno con coraggio. Non arretreremo un centimetro nella difesa della famiglia, della donna e dei bambini.

听听Fabienne Keller, au nom du groupe Renew. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Monsieur le Commissaire听Micallef, chers coll猫gues, la mont茅e de l'extr锚me droite en Europe repr茅sente une menace grandissante pour tout le monde, et plus particuli猫rement pour la communaut茅 LGBTI. En t茅moigne la r茅cente mesure du gouvernement听Meloni, qui vise 脿 annuler les enregistrements des actes d'茅tat civil des enfants des couples de m锚me sexe. En Italie, plus de 20听000 enfants 茅lev茅s par des couples de m锚me sexe sont ainsi menac茅s par la remise en cause de leur filiation l茅gale.

Aujourd'hui, dans l'Union europ茅enne, ce sont plus de 2听millions d'enfants qui pourraient faire face 脿 une situation dans laquelle ce lien avec leurs parents n'est pas reconnu. Il est donc urgent d'agir maintenant, d'autant plus que, Monsieur le Commissaire, la solution, nous l'avons d茅j脿 trouv茅e, vous l'avez rappel茅.

La Commission europ茅enne a propos茅, il y a deux ans d茅j脿, un r猫glement pour harmoniser cette reconnaissance et introduire un certificat europ茅en. Cette reconnaissance ne permettrait pas simplement de mettre fin 脿 l'incertitude, mais elle offrirait 茅galement une garantie r茅elle de protection des droits et l'茅galit茅 pour les familles.

Alors, chers coll猫gues, qu'attendons-nous pour la mettre en 艙uvre? Avec mon groupe Renew Europe, nous portons haut et fort les valeurs europ茅ennes d'茅galit茅. J'appelle donc les 脡tats membres 脿 faire avancer cette proposition, essentielle pour la s茅curit茅 juridique pour tous, pour l'茅galit茅, pour la protection des enfants dans l'Union europ茅enne. Nous devons cela 脿 tous les enfants europ茅ens.

听听Kim Van Sparrentak, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group. 鈥� Madam听President, dear colleagues, this summer I am getting married and I honestly can't wait to call my beautiful fianc茅e my wife. I can't wait to celebrate with all our friends and family and use our legal rights to be recognised as partners for life.

And two weeks later, one of my best friends is also getting married and I know he is as excited as me to tie the knot with his girlfriend. But the sad reality is that within our union of equality, my friend and I aren't equal, because there are still Member States that disavow a marriage between me and my girlfriend. They are allowed to prevent us from accessing our social security or our claims to residency and they can disregard the other if we have to make unthinkable medical choices. They are still allowed to hinder us in our right to free movement. Some marriage certificates are apparently more meaningful than others.

And this is definitely not about me. It is about baby Sara, who is a toddler by now, and her mums, who have been fighting for their child not to grow up stateless. This is about Adrian Coman, whose partner was prevented from living with him in his home country of Romania. It is about Arian Mirzarafie-Ahi not having to fight for the legal gender recognition he already obtained, especially when the possibilities are limited and dehumanising.

The courts are clear: freedom of movement means that if you are a parent in one country, you are a parent in every country. If you are a spouse in one country, you are a spouse in every country. If you obtain legal gender recognition in one country, you obtain legal gender recognition in every country.

Commission, I'm looking forward to you putting this into law and I'm especially looking forward to seeing that happen within the new LGBTIQ equality strategy.

听听Siegbert Frank Droese, im Namen der ESN-Fraktion. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin! Verehrte Kollegen! Ich wundere mich schon, dass wir heute die Tagesordnung nicht ge盲ndert haben. Sie haben es wahrscheinlich mitbekommen: Ein Weltereignis von Weltrang hat sich gestern ereignet. Die Pr盲sidenten Trump und Putin werden einen Friedensprozess in Gang setzen, was die Ukraine betrifft. Die Kommission, das Parlament, die EU spielen dabei keine Rolle. Da h盲tte ich mir ehrlich gesagt gew眉nscht, dass wir heute 眉ber dieses Thema reden. Nun ist es so. Wir reden jetzt heute 眉ber das Problem gleichgeschlechtlicher Paare.

Die Kommission propagiert jeden Tag pausenlos ihre EU-Werte und will sie m枚glichst global durchsetzen. Was f眉r eine Vermessenheit! Dass dadurch Abkommen verhindert werden, oft die Wirtschaft der EU Schaden nimmt, ist der Kommission dabei vollkommen egal. Dabei scheint die Kommission nicht zu interessieren, dass die Mehrheit der L盲nder auf der Welt andere Werte als diese EU hat. Dies gilt insbesondere f眉r den Bereich Familie. Sechs L盲nder haben nicht der Idee von gleichgeschlechtlichen Ehen zugestimmt, darunter Bulgarien, Rum盲nien und Polen. Diese L盲nder haben andere Traditionen. Warum kann man das nicht respektieren? Diese EU macht doch immer Reklame f眉r Einheit in Vielfalt. Gilt das normale und traditionelle Familienbild aus Mutter, Vater, Kindern, das in Europa seit Anbeginn der Zeit herrscht, nicht als sch眉tzenswerter Teil einer Vielfalt? Warum werden hier L盲nder wie Rum盲nien bedroht, die ihre Verfassung ver盲ndern m眉ssen? Das finden wir 眉bergriffig, das ist widerlich, das ist abzulehnen.

Um es klar zu sagen: Niemand soll diskriminiert werden. Es soll aber auch niemand bevorzugt werden. Gleichbehandlung f眉r jedermann. Diese EU will nun grenz眉berschreitend, dass alle privaten Lebensformen 眉berall in der EU anerkannt werden. Nein, das soll jedes Land selbst entscheiden. Das ist eine nationale Aufgabe der Mitgliedsl盲nder. Diese EU, solange sie noch besteht, soll sich auf ihre Kernkompetenzen, wenn sie die denn hat, konzentrieren und sich nicht in das Privatleben der B眉rger einmischen. Wir respektieren das Privatleben aller B眉rger. Wir stehen aber auch f眉r Familie aus Mutter, Vater, Kindern.

Die Souver盲nit盲t einer Nation hei脽t auch Souver盲nit盲t in den Familienfragen und Respekt vor Privatangelegenheiten seiner B眉rger. Und von dieser Stelle aus m枚chte ich meinen Landsleuten zurufen: Wenn Sie Freiheit, Frieden und Souver盲nit盲t gro脽e Beachtung schenken, haben Sie n盲chste Woche am Sonntag die Gelegenheit. Wir sagen dazu: Von den Alpen bis zur See w盲hlen alle AfD. Oder in einfacher Sprache: Sei schlau, w盲hl blau!

听听Evin Incir (S&D). 鈥� Madam President, it is absurd that a person or a state can even think the thought that it should deprive children of their fundamental right to their parent. The refusal to fully recognise parenthood across Member States is rooted in homophobia. It is not protecting children; it is actually harming children.

The hatred against the LGBTI community doesn't belong in a modern society. Conservatives and the far right here in the EU: your echo that children should be deprived their fundamental right to their parents are the same words that are being said by the mullahs in Iran and by the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Children have the right to be protected from the far-right hatred, not from their parents!

听听Lucia Yar (Renew). 鈥� V谩啪en谩 pani predsedaj煤ca, dnes tu stoj铆m s v铆ziou Eur贸py, ktor谩 je spravodliv谩, l谩skav谩 a vern谩 svojim spolo膷n媒m hodnot谩m, p谩n predre膷n铆k. Eur贸py postavenej na tolerancii, kde o vz钮ahu dvoch dospel媒ch 木ud铆 rozhoduj煤 ich city, ich vz谩jomn茅 city, a nie povolenia politikov, kde ka啪d茅 die钮a, bez oh木adu na orient谩ciu alebo pohlavie svojich rodi膷ov, m谩 pr谩vo na stabilitu, bezpe膷ie a rodinu. Ver铆m v Eur贸psku 煤niu, ktor谩 sp谩ja, nie rozde木uje. Tak煤, ktor谩 nedovol铆, aby prekro膷enie hranice znamenalo stratu rodi膷a. Aj Eur贸psky s煤dny dvor, u啪 sme o tom po膷uli, tvrd铆, 啪e ak je pr谩vny vz钮ah uznan媒 v jednej krajine, mus铆 ho re拧pektova钮 aj in谩 krajina. Kv么li princ铆pu spravodlivosti a ochrany t媒ch najzranite木nej拧铆ch, to je ten d么vod. A predsa, napr铆klad u n谩s na Slovensku, vid铆me opak. Populistick茅 vl谩dy predkladaj煤 n谩vrhy, ktor茅 pr谩va rod铆n neroz拧iruj煤, ale ich obmedzuj煤, zra艌uj煤 ich. My ale m谩me naviac. Vyberme si cestu, ktor谩 je cestou re拧pektu. A sk煤sme aj v tejto dobe poveda钮 jasn茅 谩no spravodlivosti. Postavme sa za Eur贸pu, v ktorej ka啪d茅 die钮a, ka啪d谩 rodina a ka啪d媒 膷lovek m谩 svoje bezpe膷n茅 miesto.

听听Rasmus Andresen (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin! Ich m枚chte, dass alle Europ盲erinnen und Europ盲er die gleichen Rechte haben, unabh盲ngig davon, wo sie leben und wen sie lieben.

Niemand hat Hass und Hetze verdient; alle haben Respekt und gleiche Rechte verdient. Es ist doch absurd, dass Menschen sich in der EU zwar frei bewegen k枚nnen, aber sie selbst und ihre Familien nicht 眉berall anerkannt werden. Es hat in der Vergangenheit mehrere F盲lle gegeben, wo gleichgeschlechtliche Paare ihre Rechte vor Gericht einklagen mussten. Zwei polnische Frauen, die in Wien ein Kind bekommen haben, aber zu Hause damit nicht anerkannt wurden. Homosexuelle M盲nner, die nach ihrem Umzug in einen anderen EU-Mitgliedstaat ihre Ehe nicht anerkannt bekommen haben.

Es ist untragbar, dass gleichgeschlechtliche Paare in der Europ盲ischen Union 2025 immer noch diskriminiert werden. Es ist unsere Pflicht, die Grundrechte von allen EU-B眉rgerinnen und -B眉rgern zu sch眉tzen. Daf眉r brauchen wir europ盲ische Gesetze, mit denen die Freiheit der Menschen gesch眉tzt und Regenbogenfamilien EU-weit anerkannt werden. Gegen Staaten wie Rum盲nien, die das systematisch untergraben, muss die EU-Kommission mit Sanktionen vorgehen.

Ich m枚chte Sie auch ganz herzlich auffordern, hier nicht nachzulassen, sondern nachzulegen, auch wenn die politische Stimmung in einigen Mitgliedstaaten vielleicht kompliziert ist. Aber Sie haben hier gemeinsam mit uns eine Verantwortung. Der m眉ssen Sie gerecht werden.

听听Robert Biedro艅 (S&D). 鈥� Pani Przewodnicz膮ca! Jutro Walentynki, 14 lutego. Niestety nie wszyscy w tej Unii R贸wno艣ci b臋d膮 mogli 艣wi臋towa膰 to 艣wi臋to. Nadal mamy w Unii Europejskiej obywateli lepszego i gorszego sortu. Nadal mamy w Unii Europejskiej rodziny, kt贸re nie maj膮 r贸wnych praw. Nadal mamy 2 miliony dzieci w Unii Europejskiej, kt贸re nie s膮 obj臋te ochron膮. Europejski certyfikat rodzicielstwa chce to zmieni膰, to dobry kierunek i dlatego dziwi臋 si臋, naprawd臋 dziwi臋 si臋 prawicy, 偶e z tak膮 nienawi艣ci膮 podchodzi do czego艣, co Wy zawsze popierali艣cie 鈥� ochrony rodziny i ochrony dzieci. Przecie偶 tu chodzi o bezpiecze艅stwo tego dziecka. Chodzi o to, 偶e kiedy jego rodzice znajduj膮 si臋 w sytuacji, kt贸ra nie jest uregulowana prawnie, to by dziecko po prostu najnormalniej w 艣wiecie by艂o bezpieczne. Nic wi臋cej i nic mniej.

(M贸wca zgodzi艂 si臋 na pytanie zasygnalizowane przez podniesienie niebieskiej kartki)

听听Bogdan Rzo艅ca (ECR), pytanie zadane przez podniesienie niebieskiej kartki. 鈥� Mam pytanie do Pana Pos艂a. Nie rozumiem tego lamentu, kt贸ry tutaj Pan Pose艂 przedstawia wraz ze swoim partnerem. Od ponad roku rz膮dzicie pa艅stwo w Polsce - Pana formacja z Donaldem Tuskiem. Rz膮dzicie w Polsce od 14 miesi臋cy. Macie wi臋kszo艣膰, mo偶ecie tak zmieni膰 prawo w Polsce, jak chcecie i nie umiecie tego zrobi膰. No i powiedzcie dlaczego?

Poza tym, Panie Po艣le, Unia Europejska jest organizacj膮 prawn膮 鈥� artyku艂 5 Traktatu o Unii Europejskiej m贸wi bardzo wyra藕nie, 偶e kompetencje nieprzyznane innym s膮 kompetencjami krajowymi. Wi臋c tak偶e tu macie wi臋kszo艣膰 w tym Parlamencie, mo偶ecie robi膰, co chcecie i nie robicie tego. Wi臋c kr贸tko m贸wi膮c, ja jestem za prawem naturalnym, mam troch臋 inne zdanie niz Pan, ale niech Pan nie ma pretensji do Kaczy艅skiego, do Prawicy o to, 偶e jeste艣cie mniejszo艣ci膮, bo jeste艣cie ...

(Przewodnicz膮ca odebra艂a m贸wcy g艂os)

听听Robert Biedro艅 (S&D), odpowied藕 na pytanie zadane przez podniesienie niebieskiej kartki. 鈥� Ja chcia艂em podzi臋kowa膰 panu pos艂owi, 偶e on tak pe艂en emocji podchodzi do tej sprawy i tutaj podpowiada, jak to zmieni膰. Prosz臋 si臋 przy艂膮czy膰. Ja my艣l臋, 偶e tutaj warto, 偶eby艣my wszyscy ponad podzia艂ami chronili ka偶dego obywatela i ka偶d膮 obywatelk臋. Je艣li chodzi o prawo unijne, Panie Po艣le, to warto doczyta膰 鈥� Europejski Trybuna艂 Sprawiedliwo艣ci wydawa艂 wyroki w tej sprawie. Brak takiej regulacji to nie tylko jest pogwa艂cenie traktat贸w, ale pogwa艂cenie tak偶e podstawowych praw cz艂owieka.听Dlatego, Panie Komisarzu, dzi臋kuj臋 za t臋 inicjatyw臋, kt贸r膮, jak rozumiem, pan Rzo艅ca b臋dzie popiera艂.

听听Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis (S&D). 鈥� Madam听President, Commissioner, of course, no child should be discriminated against because of the way they were born or the type of family they were born into. It is crucial. It is enshrined in the Lisbon Treaty, Article听2. Please read this article. We are all obliged to fulfil the requirements of human rights. All.

It's not a question of religion. Those who are mentioning Christianity, please read the Bible. Abraham and his first son and, of course, Saint Mary's story. It would be good to listen and to understand about what you are speaking. Of course, you know that all families, including rainbow families, should have the same rights in the EU. This includes, for instance, the right to maintenance and schooling, education and others.

But it is a pity we see that such a trend is growing, especially in those countries where the far right are trying to violate human rights. Of course, the parenthood regulation is still blocked in the Council. It is also a shame that the Council still, until now, has no chance to solve this problem. It is our duty to implement all human rights.

Catch-the-eye procedure

听听Margarita de la Pisa Carri贸n (PfE). 鈥� Se帽ora presidente, se帽or铆as, el Derecho de familia es competencia de los Estados miembros. La Declaraci贸n de los Derechos del Ni帽o es clara: todo ni帽o tiene un padre y una madre y tiene derecho a conocerlos y a ser cuidado por ellos en la medida de lo posible. Los v铆nculos naturales entre padres e hijos deben ser respetados, pues trascienden la propia existencia: 驴qui茅n soy?; 驴de d贸nde vengo?; el inicio de nuestra vida en el vientre materno; el v铆nculo con nuestros padres... Otras formas de paternidad interfieren en esta realidad y exponen al ni帽o y a las personas implicadas no solo a graves dilemas 茅ticos y legales, sino tambi茅n a situaciones donde se agrede su propia dignidad.

Garantizar la seguridad jur铆dica de las familias es leg铆timo; sin embargo, vemos c贸mo este principio est谩 siendo instrumentalizado para dar una nueva forma a las relaciones entre padres e hijos transform谩ndolas en contractuales, a veces incluso en mercantiles, como es la gestaci贸n subrogada. El ser humano deja de ser tratado como un sujeto de derechos y pasa a considerarse un objeto de transacci贸n, un bien de consumo, a trav茅s de la explotaci贸n de las mujeres, causando un doloroso desgarro con el hijo y normalizando la ruptura de los lazos naturales.

La dif铆cil situaci贸n en la que se puedan encontrar estos ni帽os debe ser resuelta caso a caso a nivel nacional, no por un mecanismo general europeo como es el certificado de filiaci贸n: esto alentar铆a estas pr谩cticas exponiendo a m谩s personas a esta...

(la presidenta retira la palabra a la oradora)

(End of catch-the-eye procedure)

听听Glenn Micallef, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam听President, the gender-neutral right to free movement is a cornerstone of our citizens' Union. The gender-neutral Union family law, the right to love and the right to be loved is an essential block to build a union of equality.

By requiring or facilitating the recognition of civil status documents, including for same sex couples, Union law on free movement and Union family law aim to protect the rights of couples and also of children in cross-border situations, without leaving behind any spouse or partner due to their sexual orientation and without leaving behind any child because of the way in which he was conceived or born, or because she has the same sex parents.

In facilitating the recognition of civil status documents also for same sex families, Union law does not interfere with the Member States' substantive family law, such as their rules on the definition of family or their rules on surrogacy, which fall within the competence of Member States.

However, with the recognition of civil status documents for all spouses or partners and for all children, Union law will ensure that same sex couples and their children can benefit from all their rights in any Member State.

听听President. 鈥� Thank you very much, Commissioner. The debate is closed.

Written Statements (Rule 178)

听听Rosa Estar脿s Ferragut (PPE), por escrito. 鈥� En relaci贸n con el debate en el Pleno sobre el reconocimiento transfronterizo de los documentos de estado civil de parejas del mismo sexo y sus hijos dentro del territorio de la Uni贸n, tenemos que defender que se garantice la libre circulaci贸n de todas las familias 鈥慽ncluidas las familias arco铆ris鈥� en la Uni贸n Europea.

Las familias arco铆ris siguen enfrent谩ndose a importantes obst谩culos en su derecho a ejercer la libre circulaci贸n, lo que comporta, por tanto, consecuencias negativas para sus hijos.

Desde el Parlamento Europeo, hacemos un llamamiento a actuar para eliminar estos obst谩culos que afectan al inter茅s del menor y podamos proteger sus intereses y derechos. As铆 pues, es muy importante que todos los Estados miembros garanticen el respeto a la continuidad jur铆dica de los lazos de familia de los miembros de las familias arco铆ris cuando se trasladan de un Estado miembro a otro.

No existe en este momento en la Uni贸n Europea una norma de las sentencias sobre paternidad entre los Estados miembros. Por lo tanto, resulta imprescindible una normativa en este sentido.

听听Georgiana Teodorescu (ECR), 卯n scris. 鈥� Asist膬m ast膬zi la o nou膬 tentativ膬 de impunere a unei agende ideologice care atac膬 valorile na葲ionale 葯i fundamentul societ膬葲ii: familia natural膬, format膬 dintr-o femeie 葯i un b膬rbat.

Propunerea privind recunoa葯terea transfrontalier膬 a actelor de stare civil膬 ale cuplurilor de acela葯i sex este o nou膬 ingerin葲膬 卯n suveranitatea statelor membre 葯i 卯ncalc膬 grav principiul subsidiarit膬葲ii.

Rom芒nia, ca stat suveran, 葯i-a exprimat clar voin葲a democratic膬 prin Referendumul pentru familie din 2018, c芒nd milioane de rom芒ni au votat pentru protejarea c膬s膬toriei normale, tradi葲ionale.

Uniunea European膬 nu trebuie s膬 impun膬 葲膬rilor suverane s膬 卯葯i modifice legisla葲ia na葲ional膬 sub presiunea ideologiilor de moment, iar aceast膬 ini葲iativ膬 nu are nimic de-a face cu drepturile fundamentale. Ea este un atac brutal la libertatea popoarelor 葯i a statelor de a-葯i defini propriile valori.

Europa 葯i Rom芒nia trebuie s膬 r膬m芒n膬 ferme 卯n ap膬rarea identit膬葲ii lor, a suveranit膬葲ii na葲ionale 葯i a valorilor cre葯tine 葯i conservatoare care le definesc de secole.

Resping orice tentativ膬 de uniformizare for葲at膬 卯ntr-o Uniune al c膬rei slogan este 鈥濽ni葲i 卯n diversitate鈥� 葯i reafirm cu t膬rie c膬 subsidiaritatea este principiul f膬r膬 de care UE nu va avea un viitor.