合法博彩网站

听听President. 鈥� The next item is the debate on the Council and Commission statements on the white paper on the future of European defence ().

听听Adam Sz艂apka, President-in-Office of the Council. 鈥� Madam President, Mr Commissioner, honourable Members, we are witnessing a paradigm shift in European security. We are witnessing unprecedented geopolitical changes that affect us 鈥� Europeans 鈥� directly. And the conclusion is clear: we need to take greater responsibility for our own security and defence. This requires a collective effort of EU institutions and Member States. The debate we have convened today is timely. It takes place between last week's Special European Council and the communication on the future of European defence that the Commission and the High Representative are expected to issue next week.

As I said, the direction of travel is clear: a Europe with more responsibility for its defence 鈥� the pace of our work is clearly accelerating towards that aim. Indeed, the European Council, at its special meeting on 6听March, marked an important moment in this context. As we have discussed this morning, leaders held a first discussion on the ReArm Europe plan set out by the President of the Commission and provided guidance for future EU actions. Let me briefly summarise how the Council of the European Union is working on boosting Europe's defence readiness.

We must strive for a stronger and more capable Union in the field of security and defence. Work in the Council takes place along five main priorities for EU security and defence. Firstly, we must spend more and better, and strengthen our defence, technological and industrial base. Deliberations are ongoing towards a Council general approach on the regulation establishing a European defence industry programme. We are looking forward to negotiations with 合法博彩网站. The Council is also currently conducting a strategic review of the Permanent Structured Cooperation, which will result in a revision of its legal framework.

Secondly, the EU must continue its unwavering support for Ukraine's independence, sovereignty and its territorial integrity. We must use all of our financial regulatory power to provide financial and military aid as long as it takes.

Thirdly, we need to increase the EU's ability to act, notably by effectively using both military and civilian means in a joined up manner. Efforts to operationalise the EU rapid development capacity are well underway, and military exercises will continue in 2025, increasing the EU's ability to act.

Fourthly, we must strengthen the EU's resilience and security, its access to strategic environments such as the space, maritime and air domains. To secure our access to these domains, we have agreed on strategies on cyber defence and space, and we updated the EU maritime security strategy. In October听2024, the Council approved the first ever EU cyber census, which tracks our progress in implementing the EU policy on cyber defence.

Finally, the EU should continue to strengthen and expand tailored and mutually beneficial partnerships with bilateral and multilateral partners. We stepped up political dialogue with NATO and we have also concluded a security and defence partnership with six key partners and more will follow. We must also preserve our transatlantic bonds. The step undertaken recently by the US administration may worry us, but this is our existential interest and we should keep it above the current political developments.

These are the basic aspects of what the Council considers as the priorities for developing the EU's defence capacities. We look forward to examining how these priorities are addressed in the upcoming white paper. To conclude, let me reaffirm that we are committed to building a safe and secure Europe with the same determination and a great sense of urgency. There is still a lot of work ahead of us.

听听Andrius Kubilius, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, honourable Members, thank you, first of all, for putting this debate and the morning debate on the future of European defence on the agenda.

In my view, those are the most important debates in the history of this House, because the days we are living through are days which will define the history of Europe and of the European Union.

This is a once-in-a-generation moment: we face a clear and present danger seen by none of us in our lifetimes. More than ever, Europe must prepare for the worst to prevent the worst: the possibility of military aggression against us. Such preparation is the only way to deter the worst. Russia's war industry is operating at full blast. Russia could be ready for a confrontation with NATO in five years or less. American actions are a wake-up call: their policy shift and pivot towards Asia.

Geopolitical reality is changing before our eyes. More than ever, we must stand on our two feet, take charge of our own defence and of deterrence. More than ever, we must support and defend Ukraine. Yes, there must be a peace, but a strong peace. Peace through real strength. A peace with Ukraine and Europe at the table. A just peace, not just a pause for Russia to lick its wounds and start a new, bigger war.

A strong peace also means a strong Europe, able to deter aggression and prevent war. To do that, we must completely overhaul our defence industry, because the gaps are colossal between the defences we have and the defences we need to protect our people. Already now there is a lack of thousands of tanks, fighting vehicles, armoured vehicles, pieces of artillery, as we can guess from publications about NATO's capability targets 鈥� a shortfall of EUR听500听billion at least. Even more hundreds of billions are needed for real air defence, space defence, military mobility. Member States need to invest massively to fill these gaps and the EU will support Member States with European Union added value, European scale, European coordination, European money and European laws.

This Commission put defence on the top of the European agenda since before our mandate even started. Defence was top priority in President von der Leyen's political guidelines, and she appointed me as the first-ever European Union Defence Commissioner. She charged me in my mission letter with High Representative Kaja Kallas to present a white paper on the future of European defence, and since the very first day of my mandate, we have been working non-stop in the college, with my services, in plenty of seminars, conferences and discussions, including in this House. I have met many ministers, Members of 合法博彩网站, CEOs of defence and space industry. We received many contributions and your very valuable resolution. This month of discussions helped prepare the ground, allowing us to present key proposals already last week with the historical decisions on ReArmEU, far ahead of the white paper's publication. Because if history is running, we cannot be walking.

Last week, President von der Leyen presented the ReArmEU plan, unanimously approved two days later by a historic European Council, with key proposals to supercharge our defence spending up to EUR听800听billion, such as activating the national escape clause of the Stability and Growth Pact and the European Union instrument to support Member States with loans, redirecting existing European funding for defence like cohesion funds, encouraging investment by private banks and the European Investment Bank.

We welcome the leaders' call to reconsider excluded activities to increase funding into defence, and we encourage Member States to continue support for Ukraine by buying arms in Ukraine, with Ukraine and for Ukraine, like Denmark and Czechia are already doing. All initiatives that ensure Ukraine can stay strong and defend itself need to be supported. We will present four legal proposals on ReArmEU before the next European Council.

It is not enough to spend more: spending more in a fragmented market will only fragment it more. Spending more can also mean spending more outside the European Union. This will only increase our dependence. We need to spend better, spend together and spend European, as well as work together on research and development, build more bridges between civil and military research and innovation. Artificial intelligence and quantum technology will change the nature of war, so we must leverage deep tech to level up defence readiness. We must work on priority areas for action at EU level in the field of capabilities like air and missile defence, strategic enablers 鈥� including in relation to space 鈥� and military mobility.

This is where European Union programmes for joint procurement and joint development programmes like EDIP are crucial. With these programmes, we can incentivise Member States to spend together, to overcome fragmentation, to spend smart and to spend the European. This is how we will build up our own European defence industry, because the defence industry is no ordinary industry, but a resource for our defence. We are encouraging joint procurement to give our European industry the big orders it needs, to simplify production, to reduce the price of armaments and reduce fragmentation. We will simplify our laws and rules to remove all obstacles that stand in the way of ramping up our defence industry. All that is what the white paper is about, and now we need to scale up and speed up. I know this House strongly supports European defence, as President Metsola made clear, as many of you made clear to me during last week when I spoke with the ITRE Committee.

This is why I call on you urgently to agree the 合法博彩网站's negotiating position on EDIP, the European defence industry programme, which will allow us to be much more effective in bringing European Union added value to help Member States spend their national defence money in the most useful way. I welcome the Council's call to conclude negotiations as soon as possible. EDIP was proposed a year ago. History will not wait for us. Putin will not wait for us. Next week we will present the white paper to rethink European defence in this strategic moment.

Let me close with some inspiration from history. I recently read the memoirs of Jean Monnet. Jean Monnet was a founding father of the European Union, our great project of peace. But did you know that Jean Monnet was also a father of victory in the Second World War? Jean Monnet helped Churchill and Roosevelt prepare the so-called 'victory programme' to ramp up military production in the United States to defeat the Nazis. He would have recognised many of our current challenges.

Jean Monnet also said 'people only make great decisions when crisis is on their doorstep.' This is the greatest security crisis of our lifetimes, and we must now take the great decisions. All of Europe is a target of Russian aggression. We are all frontline Member States. The white paper is the basis for our industrial victory programme. Victory in defence of peace on the European continent. The white paper and ReArmEU are just the beginning of our road: the road to the victory of peace and democracy in Europe, and we shall prevail.

听听Rasa Juknevi膷ien臈, on behalf of the PPE Group. 鈥� Madam听President, dear colleagues, if we want to avoid even greater war in Europe, we must be prepared for war with Russia in the shortest possible time. War with today's Russia, whose ideology 鈥� Russkiy Mir 鈥� means destroying or enslaving everything that is not Russian.

A challenge for Europe in the short term is on Ukraine's battlefield. The future of Europe will be decided there. Member States should commit at least 0.25听% of their GDP to military aid to Ukraine. Ukraine's defence industries should be integrated with the European one.

In the longer term, to ensure that most EU policies align with defence and security needs. Defence is the priority of priorities. We need to increase our defence spending to at least 3听% of GDP in 2026 as a start. The EU was not created as a defence union. Europe flourished on US security guarantees. Everything has changed.

We will have to fill the huge security capabilities gap and diversify our security policy to build our own capabilities while trying to maintain and strengthen the transatlantic bond.

Tomorrow we will vote for a resolution on the white paper on defence. But this is just the very beginning of a difficult but very necessary journey 鈥� an existential journey.

听听螕喂维谓谓畏蟼 螠伪谓喂维蟿畏蟼, 蔚尉 慰谓蠈渭伪蟿慰蟼 蟿畏蟼 慰渭维未伪蟼 S&D. 鈥� 螝蠀蟻委伪 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 伪纬伪蟺畏蟿慰委 蟽蠀谓维未蔚位蠁慰喂, 畏 螞蔚蠀魏萎 螔委尾位慰蟼, 蟺慰蠀 伪谓伪渭苇谓蔚蟿伪喂 蟽蔚 渭蔚蟻喂魏苇蟼 渭苇蟻蔚蟼, 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 伪蟺慰蟿蔚位苇蟽蔚喂 蟿慰谓 慰未喂魏蠈 蠂维蟻蟿畏, 蠋蟽蟿蔚 渭蔚 蟽蠀纬魏蔚魏蟻喂渭苇谓慰 蠂蟻慰谓慰未喂维纬蟻伪渭渭伪 魏伪喂 渭苇蟿蟻伪 谓伪 魏维谓蔚喂 蟿畏谓 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 螆谓蠅蟽畏 喂魏伪谓萎 谓伪 伪谓蟿喂渭蔚蟿蠅蟺委蟽蔚喂 蟿喂蟼 蟽畏渭蔚蟻喂谓苇蟼 纬蔚蠅蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏苇蟼 蟺蟻慰魏位萎蟽蔚喂蟼. 围蟻蔚喂伪味蠈渭伪蟽蟿蔚 渭喂伪 喂蟽蠂蠀蟻萎 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 伪渭蠀谓蟿喂魏萎 尾喂慰渭畏蠂伪谓喂魏萎 魏伪喂 蟿蔚蠂谓慰位慰纬喂魏萎 尾维蟽畏. 螖蔚谓 蔚委谓伪喂 尾喂蠋蟽喂渭慰 谓伪 蟺畏纬伪委谓蔚喂 蟽蔚 蟿蟻委蟿蔚蟼 蠂蠋蟻蔚蟼听蟺维谓蠅 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰 70% 蟿蠅谓 蠂蟻畏渭维蟿蠅谓 蟺慰蠀 未伪蟺伪谓慰蠉渭蔚 纬喂伪 蔚尉慰蟺位喂蟽渭慰蠉蟼. 螤位萎蟿蟿蔚喂 蟿畏谓 慰喂魏慰谓慰渭委伪 渭伪蟼, 蟺位萎蟿蟿蔚喂 蟿畏谓 魏慰喂谓蠅谓喂魏萎 渭伪蟼 蟽蠀谓慰蠂萎, 蟺位萎蟿蟿蔚喂 蟿畏谓 伪谓蟿伪纬蠅谓喂蟽蟿喂魏蠈蟿畏蟿维 渭伪蟼, 蔚蟺畏蟻蔚维味蔚喂 伪蟻谓畏蟿喂魏维 蟿畏谓 伪蟽蠁维位蔚喂维 渭伪蟼, 魏伪胃蠋蟼 伪蠀尉维谓蔚喂 蟿喂蟼 伪渭蠀谓蟿喂魏苇蟼 蔚尉伪蟻蟿萎蟽蔚喂蟼 伪蟺蠈 蟿蟻委蟿蔚蟼 蠂蠋蟻蔚蟼.

螖蠀蟽蟿蠀蠂蠋蟼, 蟿慰 ReArm EU, 伪谓 魏伪喂 蠁喂位蠈未慰尉慰, 未蔚谓 伪蟺慰蟿蔚位蔚委 蠈蟽慰 伪蟺慰蟿蔚位蔚蟽渭伪蟿喂魏萎 胃伪 胃苇位伪渭蔚 位蠉蟽畏 蟽蟿伪 蟺蟻慰尾位萎渭伪蟿伪 蟺慰蠀 苇蠂慰蠀渭蔚. 螖蔚谓 胃苇位慰蠀渭蔚 谓苇伪 未维谓蔚喂伪, 伪位位维 魏慰喂谓维 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏维 蠂蟻畏渭伪蟿慰未慰蟿喂魏维 蔚蟻纬伪位蔚委伪. 螕喂伪 谓伪 苇蠂慰蠀渭蔚 渭喂伪 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 伪渭蠀谓蟿喂魏萎 苇谓蠅蟽畏 蟺慰蠀 谓伪 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 蠀蟺蔚蟻伪蟽蟺委味蔚蟿伪喂 伪蟺慰蟿蔚位蔚蟽渭伪蟿喂魏维 蟿伪 蟽蠉谓慰蟻伪 魏伪喂 蟿慰蠀蟼 蟽蠀渭渭维蠂慰蠀蟼 蟿畏蟼, 未蔚谓 伪蟺伪喂蟿慰蠉谓蟿伪喂 渭蠈谓慰 蔚蟺喂蟺位苇慰谓 蠂蟻萎渭伪蟿伪. 螒蟺伪喂蟿慰蠉谓蟿伪喂 蟺蟻慰纬蟻维渭渭伪蟿伪 蠈蟺蠅蟼 蟿慰 EDIP, 渭蔚 伪蠀蟽蟿畏蟻慰蠉蟼 魏伪谓蠈谓蔚蟼, 蠋蟽蟿蔚 慰喂 蔚蟺蔚谓未蠉蟽蔚喂蟼 谓伪 伪谓蟿喂渭蔚蟿蠅蟺委蟽慰蠀谓 蟿慰 苇位位蔚喂渭渭伪 蟽蟿蟻伪蟿畏纬喂魏蠋谓 渭苇蟽蠅谓 魏伪喂 未喂伪位蔚喂蟿慰蠀蟻纬喂魏蠈蟿畏蟿伪蟼 蟺慰蠀 苇蠂慰蠀渭蔚. N伪 未伪蟺伪谓畏胃慰蠉谓 蟽蟿畏谓 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏, 蔚谓喂蟽蠂蠉慰谓蟿伪蟼 蟿畏谓 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 伪渭蠀谓蟿喂魏萎 尾喂慰渭畏蠂伪谓喂魏萎 尾维蟽畏 蟽蔚 蠈位伪 蟿伪 魏蟻维蟿畏 渭苇位畏, 纬喂伪 谓伪 渭蔚喂蠅胃慰蠉谓 慰喂 蔚尉伪蟻蟿萎蟽蔚喂蟼 伪蟺蠈 蟿蟻委蟿蔚蟼 蠂蠋蟻蔚蟼. O喂 蔚蟺蔚谓未蠉蟽蔚喂蟼 谓伪 渭畏谓 纬委谓慰蠀谓 蟽蔚 尾维蟻慰蟼 蟿畏蟼 魏慰喂谓蠅谓喂魏萎蟼 蟽蠀谓慰蠂萎蟼 魏伪喂 蟿慰蠀 魏慰喂谓蠅谓喂魏慰蠉 魏蟻维蟿慰蠀蟼.

韦喂 蟽畏渭伪蟽委伪 苇蠂蔚喂 谓伪 苇蠂慰蠀渭蔚 喂蟽蠂蠀蟻蠈 蟽蟿蟻伪蟿蠈 蟽蟿伪 蟽蠉谓慰蟻伪, 蔚维谓 蠀蟺慰谓慰渭蔚蠉蟽慰蠀渭蔚 蟿畏谓 伪蟽蠁维位蔚喂伪 蟿蠅谓 魏慰喂谓蠅谓喂蠋谓 渭伪蟼 伪蠀尉维谓慰谓蟿伪蟼 蟿喂蟼 伪谓喂蟽蠈蟿畏蟿蔚蟼; 螖蔚谓 蠀蟺维蟻蠂蔚喂 蔚蠀畏渭蔚蟻委伪 蠂蠅蟻委蟼 伪蟽蠁维位蔚喂伪. 螖蔚谓 蠀蟺维蟻蠂蔚喂 伪蟽蠁维位蔚喂伪 蠂蠅蟻委蟼 蔚蠀畏渭蔚蟻委伪. 围蟻蔚喂伪味蠈渭伪蟽蟿蔚 魏慰喂谓慰蠉蟼 魏伪谓蠈谓蔚蟼 蔚尉伪纬蠅纬蠋谓 蔚尉慰蟺位喂蟽渭慰蠉, 蠋蟽蟿蔚 谓伪 渭畏 尾蟻蔚胃慰蠉谓 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏维 蠈蟺位伪 谓伪 伪蟺蔚喂位慰蠉谓 蟿畏谓 魏蠀蟻喂伪蟻蠂委伪 魏蟻伪蟿蠋谓 渭蔚位蠋谓. 韦苇位慰蟼, 胃伪 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 魏维谓慰蠀渭蔚 魏伪喂 蟿伪 伪蟺伪蟻伪委蟿畏蟿伪 胃蔚蟽渭喂魏维 尾萎渭伪蟿伪, 蠋蟽蟿蔚 畏 蟻萎蟿蟻伪 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 魏慰喂谓萎 维渭蠀谓伪, 蟿慰 维蟻胃蟻慰 42 蟺伪蟻维纬蟻伪蠁慰蟼 7 蟿畏蟼 危蠀谓胃萎魏畏蟼, 谓伪 渭畏谓 蔚委谓伪喂 魏蔚谓萎 蟺蔚蟻喂蔚蠂慰渭苇谓慰蠀, 伪位位维 谓伪 伪蟺慰蟿蔚位蔚委 蟿畏 尾伪蟽喂魏萎 蔚纬纬蠉畏蟽畏 伪蟽蠁伪位蔚委伪蟼 蠈位蠅谓 蟿蠅谓 魏蟻伪蟿蠋谓 渭蔚位蠋谓, 伪蟺蠈 蟿畏 桅喂谓位伪谓未委伪 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 螘蟽胃慰谓委伪 渭苇蠂蟻喂 蟿畏谓 螘位位维未伪 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 螝蠉蟺蟻慰. 螘蠀蠂伪蟻喂蟽蟿蠋.

听听Pierre-Romain Thionnet, au nom du groupe PfE. 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, Monsieur le Ministre, Monsieur le Commissaire, chers coll猫gues, je veux vous faire part d鈥檜ne inqui茅tude et d鈥檜n doute. L鈥檌nqui茅tude, c鈥檈st celle d鈥檜ne excitation europ茅enne passag猫re, sans lendemain; le doute, c鈥檈st 脿 propos de la r茅elle d茅termination 脿 faire en sorte que l鈥橢urope ne d茅pende de personne pour sa d茅fense. Les d茅clarations de l鈥檃dministration am茅ricaine ont provoqu茅 un 茅tat de stup茅faction sur le continent. Une parenth猫se historique s鈥檃ppr锚te 脿 se refermer: celle qui voulait que les 脡tats-Unis s鈥檈ngagent 脿 prot茅ger l鈥橢urope. Elle durait depuis soixante-dix ans pour certains 脡tats, depuis trente ans pour d鈥檃utres. Toutefois, est-ce que les appels 脿 b芒tir cette autonomie strat茅gique europ茅enne sont vraiment sinc猫res?

Imaginons un sc茅nario: apr猫s avoir conditionn茅 le maintien de la protection am茅ricaine 脿 l鈥檃ugmentation des budgets de d茅fense, Donald听Trump annonce demain une condition suppl茅mentaire: le r茅armement de l鈥橢urope doit se faire aupr猫s de l鈥檌ndustrie militaire am茅ricaine. Ce sera le moment de v茅rit茅 pour l鈥橢urope, le moment o霉 elle sera confront茅e 脿 un choix existentiel: notre destin commun doit-il rester entre les mains du locataire de la Maison-Blanche, ou bien les nations europ茅ennes sont-elles capables de retrouver confiance en elles, de croire en leur g茅nie, d鈥檈xploiter leur potentiel immense et de s鈥檃ffirmer sur la sc猫ne internationale comme une union d鈥櫭塼ats libres, capables de d茅cider et d鈥檃gir selon ses propres int茅r锚ts?

Chers coll猫gues, disons-le tout haut: nous ne voulons ni d鈥檜ne Europe russe, ni d鈥檜ne Europe rendue barbare par l鈥檌slamisme, mais pas non plus d鈥檜ne Europe am茅ricaine. Ce que nous devons rechercher et b芒tir, c鈥檈st l鈥橢urope europ茅enne.

听听Reinis Poz艈aks, on behalf of the ECR Group. 鈥� Madam President, Mr Commissioner, dear colleagues, over the last thirty years, we have seen dozens of white papers come and go 鈥� we are good at this, but I cannot imagine any of them being more important and coming at a more critical moment than this one.

Despite everything we see happening all around us, we must recognise this white paper for what it is 鈥� an opportunity to shape our own future for the next generations on our own terms with our own tools. It is time to be bold in ensuring that we work towards a total defence strategy, one that combines military and civilian assets to ensure that we are no longer exposed to hostile powers to our east. One that demonstrates our commitments to our allies. One that does everything in our power to invest our political, economic, and military capital into securing our citizens.

Restoring deterrence is our primary objective. Our enemies must know and see that war against Europe and our allies is hopeless, and to do so requires us to undertake a strategic audit of European military forces and civilian assets to ensure that we outpower our enemies. The next years are a key opportunity for us to turn Europe from security consumer to security provider. We have all the tools we need to achieve this. We only need to maintain our political will.

听听Nathalie Loiseau, au nom du groupe Renew. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, l鈥橢urope de la d茅fense est n茅e jeudi dernier. Ce fut malheureusement un accouchement dans la douleur. Il aura fallu le rapprochement entre Donald听Trump et Vladimir听Poutine pour que l鈥檕n 茅coute enfin ceux qui plaident depuis des ann茅es pour l鈥檃utonomie strat茅gique europ茅enne. Je ne c茅derai pas 脿 la facilit茅 de vous rappeler que nous vous l鈥檃vions bien dit, car personne n鈥檌maginait que les 脡tats-Unis tourneraient le dos 脿 leurs alli茅s et s鈥檃platiraient devant leurs adversaires. Je pr茅f猫re vous dire qu鈥檌l n鈥檡 a plus une minute 脿 perdre. Aussi, je salue le plan propos茅 par la pr茅sidente de la Commission, mais je nous alerte tous: ce que propose Ursula听von听der听Leyen, c鈥檈st peu et c鈥檈st tard.

C鈥檈st peu, car cela repose presque exclusivement sur une d茅marche volontaire des 脡tats membres. Or, si beaucoup ont d茅j脿 augment茅 leurs d茅penses de d茅fense, certains restent obstin茅ment 脿 la tra卯ne. C鈥檈st peu, car rien ne dit que l鈥檕n r茅soudra nos principales faiblesses, celles qui r茅sultent de la fragmentation de nos industries de d茅fense et celles qui sont le fruit d鈥檜n paradoxe toxique: nos industries exportent en priorit茅 hors de l鈥橴nion europ茅enne, et la plupart de nos 脡tats ach猫tent essentiellement hors d鈥橢urope. Nous ne pouvons plus nous le permettre et nous devons absolument assumer une pr茅f茅rence europ茅enne marqu茅e 鈥撎齟nfin!

Le plan d鈥橴rsula听von听der听Leyen arrive apr猫s des d茅cennies d鈥檌ndolence. Surtout, il ne dit pas clairement comment nous allons massivement aider l鈥橴kraine; massivement, parce que notre s茅curit茅 en d茅pend; massivement, parce que nous sommes de plus en plus seuls 脿 le faire. Saluons donc le Conseil de jeudi dernier, mais soyons lucides: ce n鈥檈st qu鈥檜ne premi猫re 茅tape. D茅fendre les Europ茅ens est une ardente obligation, qui va n茅cessiter des efforts et, parfois, des sacrifices. Pr茅server la paix en Europe est 脿 ce prix.

听听Reinier Van Lanschot, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group. 鈥� Madam President, dear colleagues, what do Putin, Trump and Xi have in common? They are all afraid of a united Europe. Our ambition in this vision for the future of European defence is far too low. Too many of you still believe that 27 Member States should simply do more, instead of doing things together. Too many of you still believe we can sit back and rely on NATO instead of saving NATO through European leadership. And too many of you still believe nation states alone can provide protection, instead of trusting in the protection of a united Europe.

Integrate our 27 little armies to fight as one. As President Zelenskyy said, the time has come for the armed forces of Europe to be created. So let's take the first concrete steps today. Make NATO's command and control European so we can operate as one. Jointly procure strategic enablers so we can fight effectively. Create permanent multinational units so we can get 50 extra brigades.

Europe is a peace project, but how can we be strong enough to defend it? The answer to that existential question is simple and consists of three things: Unite! Unite! Unite!

Let's not wait for war to unite us. Let's unite to prevent war. And to my Dutch colleagues in the national parliament who just voted against the REARM plans from Ms von der Leyen, I say you're making a massive mistake.

听听Marc Botenga, au nom du groupe The Left. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Monsieur le Commissaire, chers repr茅sentants du Conseil, chers coll猫gues, 800听milliards non pas pour augmenter les salaires des Europ茅ens, ni pour augmenter les pensions, ni pour garantir des soins de sant茅 de qualit茅 脿 tous les Europ茅ens sans liste d鈥檃ttente, ni m锚me pour avoir des bus ou des trains ponctuels dans chaque ville et chaque village. Non, vous voil脿 茅pris de la folie guerri猫re. F茅licitations!

Disons les choses, cependant: nous d茅pensons d茅j脿 aujourd鈥檋ui de deux 脿 trois听fois plus que la Russie pour la guerre. Selon la presse allemande, nous avons actuellement quatre听fois plus de navires de guerre que la Russie, trois听fois plus de chars de combat et d鈥檃rtillerie et deux听fois plus d鈥檃vions de chasse, tandis que la Russie n鈥檃rrive heureusement pas 脿 conqu茅rir m锚me un quart de l鈥橴kraine. Avant que les Russes ne d茅boulent sur la Grand-Place de Bruxelles, il faudra du temps! Si vous ne voulez pas l鈥檈ntendre, ce n鈥檈st pas grave. Ce sont les faits, mais vous pr茅f茅rez l鈥檌d茅ologie.

Arr锚tez votre cin茅ma: tous ceux qui veulent plus d鈥檃rmes et plus de soldats, vous allez y envoyer vos enfants 脿 vous? C鈥檈st ce que vous allez faire? Non, ce seront encore les enfants de la classe ouvri猫re qui devront mourir! Eh bien, nous ne l鈥檃ccepterons pas. Nous devons coordonner plus, pas d茅penser plus, et investir enfin dans la diplomatie.

听听Petr Bystron, im Namen der ESN-Fraktion. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! W盲hrend wir hier diskutieren, demonstrieren gerade in Rum盲nien Hunderttausende gegen diese EU und f眉r ihren Kandidaten. F眉r den Kandidaten des Volkes, dem die Wahl gestohlen wurde, weil er gegen den Krieg war, gegen weitere Waffenlieferungen an die Ukraine. Und wie hat die EU reagiert? Wie hat dieses Parlament reagiert? Hier wurde die Debatte dar眉ber verhindert. Das ist eine Schande! Stattdessen haben Sie hier Vertreter von dubiosen NGOs aus der Ukraine und aus Wei脽russland eingeladen, die hier gegen Russland gehetzt haben. Was haben die hier im Plenum 眉berhaupt zu suchen im Parlament? Die sind durch niemanden gew盲hlt, durch niemanden demokratisch legitimiert, und deren L盲nder geh枚ren nicht mal zur EU. Wer das zu verantworten hat, der tritt die Demokratie mit F眉脽en.

Ja, wer hat uns verraten? Die Christdemokraten. Die CDU stimmt hier mit den Sozialisten, Kommunisten und mit den Gr眉nen, obwohl es rechts hier rechtskonservative Mehrheiten gibt. Und das ist Verrat am W盲hler, mein lieber Kollege. Das will Merz in Deutschland genauso tun; da will man sogar das Grundgesetz 盲ndern wegen 800听Milliarden neuer Schulden听鈥� 300听Milliarden f眉r Waffen, 500听Milliarden, um die Infrastruktur waffen鈥� und panzertauglich zu machen. Sie wollen uns in den Krieg treiben. Das ist es听鈥� und das v枚llig illegal, denn Merz will das sogar mit dem alten, abgew盲hlten Bundestag machen, weil er die Mehrheiten in dem neuen Bundestag gar nicht hat. Das ist wirklich verfassungswidrig. Es gibt da 眉berhaupt keine Eilbed眉rftigkeit.

Die Menschen wollen keine Kriegstreiberei, die Menschen wollen Frieden. Weil das so ist, m眉ssen Sie hier solche Spielchen spielen wie am Vormittag mit diesen NGOs. Deswegen bauen Sie hier Russland zu einem Feind auf. Von wegen Russland will uns angreifen; das ist doch v枚lliger Schwachsinn. Was will denn Russland, wenn sie uns hier besetzen? Wir haben doch gar nichts au脽er Schulden 鈥� 2,5听Billionen Schulden. Meinen Sie, das russische Volk will das abzahlen f眉r uns? Und die 800听Milliarden obendrauf? Sicher nicht.

(Die Pr盲sidentin entzieht dem Redner das Wort.)

听听President. 鈥� Colleagues, please calm down. Please. No, I have closed the microphone.

I will ask my colleagues to remember that you have the blue-card option very soon, so you have a chance to ask questions for your colleagues. And when you don't have the blue card, please let people speak quietly. Please, colleagues. Thank you.

So now we are here where I open up for the blue-card option. We always do that after the first round of speakers on behalf of the political groups. And we ended that.

听听David McAllister (PPE). 鈥� Madam President, dear Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, I can echo a lot of things that have been said already in this debate, but not a single word of my previous speaker.

After numerous wake-up calls we have discussed here, Europe's moment of truth has finally arrived. We're not starting from scratch. In March听2022, the 27听heads of state or government adopted the Strategic Compass. A year later, the Commission published the European Defence Industrial Strategy, and we also adopted ASAP and EDIRPA and agreed on the capability development priorities.

All these initiatives are slowly but surely pushing Member States to step outside their national corridors in pursuit of a genuine European Defence Union. But now we really have to make a great leap.

Therefore, dear Commissioner Kubilius, the white paper must build on these achievements, and propose regulatory and programmatic initiatives at European level, rather than confining itself to a description of threats and shared needs.

You, dear Commissioner, and the HR/VP have a chance to significantly steer this debate. I look forward to discussing the white paper thoroughly at committee level.

听听Sven Mikser (S&D). 鈥� Madam听President, colleagues, the fragile entire security situation around us makes it absolutely imperative that we improve our ability to deter our adversaries, but also, if and when necessary, fight and win wars.

The dramatic reversal, of course, by our traditional American allies further underscores the need to achieve European strategic autonomy and industrial sovereignty. It actually underscores that some dependencies that we used to regard as security guarantees may, in this changed situation, prove to be vulnerabilities instead.

A stronger focus on defence and defence industrial base is not merely expenditure. It actually provides a boost for our economic competitiveness and economic activity. But it's also important to see that this additional impetus to our economic growth be shared equitably across our Union.

It has been said that we need to spend smarter and do more together, but it is obvious it's inevitable that we also need to start spending more, both at EU level, but also in our national budgets, where, let's be honest, the bulk of our defence spending and also capability generation will continue to happen.

We must be open to considering all novel ways of financing our ambitious programmes, both public and private sources. But while it may be tempting to think that at this critical time everything except defence can be put on the backburner, this is not the case, because there are two types of challenges our democracies face, both external 鈥� of military nature 鈥� but also internal. We must not provide additional fodder for the pro-Putin illiberal sentiment.

听听Roberto Vannacci (PfE). 鈥� Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, oggi la signora von der Leyen 猫 Polifemo e io mi chiamo Nessuno e posso dirvi con assoluta certezza che il libro bianco 猫 un cavallo di Troia.

Perch茅, chi 猫 il nemico? E quali sarebbero gli scenari strategici? Perch茅 se il nemico 猫 la Russia, la Russia spende in termini assoluti, in difesa, due volte e mezzo in meno di quanto non spenda l'Unione europea e ha un PIL pi霉 basso dell'Italia ed 猫 un nono di quello dell'Unione europea ed ha una popolazione che 猫 un terzo di quella dell'Unione europea ed ha una capacit脿 industriale che 猫 ridicola di fronte alla capacit脿 industriale del Vecchio continente.

Ma come: negli ultimi tre anni ci avete dipinto una Russia infognata nel Donbass e che perde di fronte a un modesto avversario come l'Ucraina e oggi ce la volete dipingere come il nemico dell'intera Unione europea? Fate pace con il cervello.

La realt脿 猫 che Bruxelles vuole ingoiare la sovranit脿 nazionale con la scusa e il pretesto della difesa comune. Quello di cui abbiamo bisogno sono nazioni forti con eserciti....

(La Presidente toglie la parola all'oratore)

听听Elena Donazzan (ECR). 鈥� Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, se questo 猫 il tempo delle scelte forti, Commissario, come ha detto lei, perch茅 il contesto 猫 completamente mutato e oggi dobbiamo discutere di alcuni temi che pensavamo lasciati alla tranquillit脿: dobbiamo difendere la nostra civilt脿, la nostra economia e i nostri confini in un contesto di conflitto ibrido permanente.

Accanto ad alcuni che abbiamo identificato come problemi, per貌, ce ne sono altri, di scenari: oltre a quello Russia-Ucraina, c'猫 il Medio Oriente, c'猫 il Centrafrica, ci sono altri soggetti pericolosi per noi, c'猫 la Cina, c'猫 il ruolo della Turchia, c'猫 il ruolo dell'Iran, c'猫 l'islamismo che avanza.

Ecco, nel libro bianco mi aspetto che ci siano valutazioni di questo tipo, perch茅 avremmo bisogno di un'industria della difesa, avremo bisogno di dual use, avremo bisogno di forze armate sempre pi霉 preparate e di nostri soldati sempre pi霉 sicuri, perch茅 a loro va il nostro grazie.

E, come ha detto nella relazione di Niinist枚, c'猫 anche da guardare alla popolazione, che deve essere pi霉 preparata. E soprattutto ai giovani dobbiamo parlare, affinch茅 possano avere pi霉 amor di patria e capacit脿 di difesa.

听听Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann (Renew). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin! Dass es jetzt turbulent zugeht, ist angesichts des Themas nicht 眉berraschend. Es geht hier um Krieg oder Frieden und darum, wie unsere Zukunft gestaltet werden wird, und wir haben heute auch Zuschauerinnen und Zuschauer hier. Ich glaube, so eine Debatte ist nicht nur wichtig, sondern es geht auch darum, darauf hinzuweisen, was gerade um uns herum passiert.

Die Welt brennt, und Russland bombardiert mehr denn je die Ukraine, und wir konnten uns heute Morgen noch einmal ein Bild davon machen, was sich dort alles abspielt听鈥� das ist unmenschlich, das ist schrecklich, und noch schrecklicher ist es, dass so etwas ignoriert wird.

Europa stellt sich auf听鈥� auch im Rahmen der NATO m眉ssen wir st盲rker werden: die europ盲ischen Staaten, die EU-Staaten, aber auch die europ盲ischen Staaten, die nicht in der EU sind. Und das ist die gute Nachricht: 29 von 32听NATO-Staaten haben jetzt die Chance, auch unabh盲ngiger zu werden.

Wir m眉ssen aber auch wettbewerbsf盲higer werden. Wettbewerbsf盲higer, damit wir eben auch in die Zukunft gehen k枚nnen, denn das Geld, was wir heute in die Hand nehmen, brauchen wir, aber es muss am langen Ende auch wieder erwirtschaftet werden. Das, was wir in der Ukraine sehen听鈥� ich komme noch einmal darauf zur眉ck听鈥�, zeigt ja Bilder, wie wir sie aus dem Ersten Weltkrieg kennen, aber auch die moderne, schreckliche Kriegsf眉hrung, und darauf m眉ssen wir Antworten finden in Forschung, in Technik.

Ich bin dem neuen Kommissar f眉r Verteidigung und Sicherheit sehr dankbar, dass er mit gro脽em Elan an die Arbeit herangegangen ist. Und nat眉rlich ist das harte Arbeit, jetzt die Nationen zu 眉berzeugen, die einzelnen Staaten, dass sie auch Europa vertrauen k枚nnen. Und das wird die Zukunft weisen, dass wir auch vertrauensw眉rdig sind, dass wir das Geld, was wir in die Hand nehmen, auch sinnvoll und richtig einsetzen. Und das Wei脽buch muss听鈥� hoffe ich听鈥� sehr klar und deutlich sein. Die Zeit von 鈥瀕ala鈥� und 鈥瀢ir gucken mal鈥� und 鈥瀊usiness as usual鈥� ist vorbei.

Meine Damen und Herren, so wie ich gerade angefangen habe, sage ich Ihnen, dass die Welt brennt, und wir in Europa k枚nnen den Unterschied machen als gr枚脽tes Friedensprojekt der Welt.

PRE葮EDIN葰IA: NICOLAE 艦TEF膫NU葰膫
痴颈肠别辫谤别葯别诲颈苍迟别

听听Hannah Neumann (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Mr President, I guess you all remember those painful images from the Oval Office when Trump and Vance openly joined the autocrats' camp, bullying and humiliating President Zelenskyy in front of cameras? If this, dear colleagues, is not the world we want to submit to 鈥� and I certainly don't 鈥� then we must be the alternative.

We must defend the rules-based international order, basing decisions on facts, treating partners with respect, and we must finally stand on our own feet. This means weapons and funding, but most crucially, it means attracting the brightest minds in science, tech and engineering. And here, dear colleagues, is the perfect match because many in the US also reject this administration's agenda 鈥� they too, are desperately looking for an alternative. So let's roll out the red carpet, launch a new blue card for a new era, a fast-track visa for skilled professionals from the US who want to work in Europe and build a future based on ethics, sustainability and fair growth. And to the scientists, engineers and innovators in the US: come to Europe. When autocrats embolden autocrats, democrats stand with democrats.

听听脰zlem Demirel (The Left). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident! Bl眉hende Munitionslandschaften, bl眉hende Waffenlandschaften, bl眉hende Kriegslandschaften听鈥� das ist das Versprechen der Europ盲ischen Kommission an die B眉rgerinnen und B眉rger der EU. Die Gelder aus den Koh盲sionsfonds, die eigentlich daf眉r vorgesehen sind, die Lebensverh盲ltnisse in der EU anzugleichen, k枚nnen weiterhin umgeschichtet werden in die Waffenindustrie. Milliarden werden seit geraumer Zeit von der EU in den Rachen der Waffenindustrie geschmissen, und seit Beginn des Ukraine鈥慘rieges ist die Rheinmetall鈥慉ktie um das Zehnfache gestiegen听鈥� von 98听鈧� auf 980听鈧�.听Ja, es gibt jene, die Partys machen aufgrund von Kriegen, und es gibt jene, die in Kriegen sterben, und das sind die Armen und die Arbeitenden.

Sie f枚rdern听鈥� das muss man sich mal vergegenw盲rtigen听鈥� Sie f枚rdern und hegen und pflegen mehr die R眉stungsindustrie als das, was Sie im Moment in der EU f眉r die Kinder, f眉r ihre Zukunft investieren und tun, und das ist inakzeptabel. Aufr眉stung wird weder Europa noch die Welt sicherer machen. Sie behaupten, damit w眉rden Sie sogar die Demokratie st盲rken. Im Gegenteil: Militarismus schw盲cht die liberale Demokratie. Deshalb sagen wir Nein!

(Die Rednerin ist damit einverstanden, auf eine Frage nach dem Verfahren der 鈥瀊lauen Karte鈥� zu antworten.)

听听Lukas Sieper (NI), Frage nach dem Verfahren der 鈥瀊lauen Karte鈥�. 鈥� Frau Kollegin! Meine Frage an Sie w盲re: Glauben Sie wirklich, dass irgendjemand Bock auf Krieg hat? Glauben Sie wirklich, dass wir die R眉stungsindustrie, dass wir die Verteidigung st盲rken, weil uns das Spa脽 macht, weil wir gerne Waffen bauen? Oder glauben Sie nicht viel eher, dass wir das zum Beispiel machen, weil ein blutr眉nstiger Diktator im Osten dieses Kontinents einen Angriffskrieg gestartet hat und seine Armee unz盲hlige Kriegsverbrechen begeht?

听听脰zlem Demirel (The Left), Antwort auf eine Frage nach dem Verfahren der 鈥瀊lauen Karte鈥�. 鈥� Herr Sieper, ich kann nicht in Ihren Kopf kucken und wei脽 nat眉rlich nicht genau, was Sie m枚chten oder nicht m枚chten. Die Sache ist aber die, dass ich mir die Realit盲t ankucke, und die Sache ist die, dass ich mir auch die Geschichte Europas ankucke. Wenn ich mir die Geschichte Europas ankucke, dann gab es eine Zeit der radikalen Aufr眉stung; das war vor dem Ersten Weltkrieg, und das m眉ndete darin. Die Lehre aus dem Ersten Weltkrieg war 眉brigens, dass man in Diplomatie und Abr眉stung investieren sollte.

Wenn Sie uns heute erz盲hlen, dass Abschreckung mit Aufr眉stung erreicht wird, dann sage ich Ihnen, auch im Kalten Krieg war es die Diplomatie, die uns davor besch眉tzt hat, einen schlimmeren Krieg zu erleben als die Aufr眉stung selber. Deshalb, wirklich, wenn Sie keinen Krieg wollen, Herr Sieper, dann pl盲dieren Sie bitte f眉r einen anderen Kurs in der EU als f眉r die Aufr眉stung!

听听Sarah Knafo (ESN). 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, Monsieur le Commissaire, chers coll猫gues, nous assistons depuis deux mois 脿 une sc猫ne improbable. Les plus fervents atlantistes de cette assembl茅e d茅couvrent soudain qu鈥檌l ne faut plus d茅pendre de Washington. M锚me ceux qui se taisaient quand Barack听Obama pla莽ait les dirigeants europ茅ens sur 茅coute, m锚me ceux qui ne disaient rien quand Joe听Biden emp锚chait la construction de sous-marins fran莽ais en Australie, m锚me ceux-l脿 viennent nous dire aujourd鈥檋ui qu鈥檕n ne peut finalement faire confiance qu鈥櫭� nous-m锚mes. Vous d茅couvrez l鈥檌nd茅pendance par antitrumpisme. Nous, nous n鈥檃vons pas attendu le nom du locataire de la Maison-Blanche pour savoir qu鈥檌l fallait d茅fendre notre pays nous-m锚mes. Cela fait soixante-dix ans que le g茅n茅ral de Gaulle vous le disait. Nos nations ont un devoir de puissance. Nous ne pouvons pas compter 茅ternellement sur un pays dont les int茅r锚ts vitaux sont situ茅s 脿 un oc茅an des n么tres.

Attention, toutefois, ne remplacez pas une d茅pendance par une autre. Ce n鈥檈st pas la Commission europ茅enne qui vous d茅fendra. La d茅fense d鈥檜ne nation, c鈥檈st sa survie, et la survie ne se n茅gocie pas entre bureaucrates, 脿 la majorit茅 qualifi茅e. Ne donnez pas 脿 Mme听von听der听Leyen le pouvoir d鈥檈nvoyer vos fils sur le champ de bataille. Il faut nous r茅armer, et on ne r茅arme pas une nation avec des comptes publics en faillite. Une 茅conomie de guerre, ce n鈥檈st pas une machine 脿 jeter notre argent par les fen锚tres au profit de pays du monde entier. Si nous voulons gagner la prochaine guerre, il nous faut d鈥檃bord gagner tout de suite la guerre contre le gaspillage, les gabegies et le d茅sordre budg茅taire.

Notre r茅armement doit b茅n茅ficier exclusivement 脿 notre industrie militaire. Si vous achetez am茅ricain, vous restez sous tutelle am茅ricaine 鈥撎齝鈥檈st aussi simple que cela. La France, seule puissance nucl茅aire du continent, dot茅e d鈥檜ne arm茅e exceptionnelle, a un r么le historique 脿 jouer. Pour les nations qui voudraient se placer sous notre protection, il faudra contribuer et donner 脿 la France les moyens n茅cessaires, car la puissance exige des moyens. En revanche, notre dissuasion nucl茅aire ne sera jamais 脿 partager avec quiconque, car la puissance ne se partage pas, la puissance ne se d茅l猫gue pas, et la s茅curit茅 ne se sous-traite pas. C鈥檈st 脿 nous d鈥檃ssumer l鈥檈ffort, ou 脿 nous de nous pr茅parer 脿 en payer le prix.

听听Fabio De Masi (NI). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, sehr geehrte Damen und Herren! Seit drei Jahren wird nun ein sinnloser und vermeidbarer Krieg in der Ukraine gef眉hrt, bei dem schon viel zu viele Menschen gestorben sind und der sich im Wesentlichen um die NATO鈥慞erspektive der Ukraine drehte. Der Krieg ist illegal, aber auch zahlreiche ranghohe US鈥慡icherheitsexperten haben gesagt, es war eine gro脽e Dummheit, immer weiter an die Tore einer Nuklearmacht heranzur眉cken.

800听Milliarden听Euro sollen nun in R眉stung verausgabt werden, w盲hrend unsere Wirtschaft im Koma liegt und unsere Infrastruktur kollabiert. Dabei geben die europ盲ischen NATO-Staaten bereits das Dreifache Russlands f眉r R眉stung aus. Russland bei脽t sich seit drei Jahren in 20听% der Ukraine die Z盲hne aus. Deswegen ist es v枚llig illusion盲r anzunehmen, dass sie morgen auf dem Grand Place oder vor dem Brandenburger Tor st眉nden.

Eines ist aber richtig: Russland verf眉gt 眉ber 5听000听Atomsprengk枚pfe, Frankreich 眉ber 290. Und die AfD fordert jetzt听鈥� 脺berraschung听鈥� in Deutschland deutsche Atombomben. Mehr Sicherheit erfordert aber wechselseitige Abr眉stungsinitiativen und eine neue europ盲ische Sicherheitsarchitektur. W盲hrend Herr Trump uns Strafz枚lle androht, hauen wir der US鈥慠眉stungsindustrie die Auftragsb眉cher voll. Das ist v枚llig widersinnig, und deswegen ist es Zeit, mit diesem Unsinn Schluss zu machen, bevor sich Generationen von Untersuchungsaussch眉ssen mit dem Filz im R眉stungssektor befassen.

(Der Pr盲sident entzieht dem Redner das Wort.)

听听Siegfried Mure艧an (PPE). 鈥� Mr President, it looks like Mr De Masi's only concern is that we stop helping Ukraine. You cannot make up your mind whether Putin is strong or whether he is weak. The only thing that you care is that we stop helping Ukraine, which is, in fact, exactly what Mr Putin wants. This is exactly why we should continue to support Ukraine, because that is in the fundamental interest of European citizens. And whoever says we should stop helping Ukraine betrays the interest of European citizens and acts against the security of Europe.

If we are weak, we are a target. If we are strong, we are safe. This is the principle that needs to guide us. This is why I say invest more in defence, to keep our citizens safe and invest more in common European projects in defence.

Commissioner Kubilius, we very much welcome the work that you're doing, and we're very much looking forward to the white paper that you're going to propose. Our expectation is to see projects in there which we at European level can do better that than Member States can do alone. And then we should also find the funds, the resources, to support the projects which the European Commission puts forward. We should show to the people of Europe that spending money at European level on defence is worth it, and that it is better spent than at national level.

听听Javi L贸pez (S&D). 鈥� Se帽or presidente, se帽or comisario, un Libro Blanco de la defensa para tener hoy una Europa aut贸noma que se haga cargo plenamente de su seguridad.

驴Por qu茅? Porque no podemos dar por garantizado el v铆nculo atl谩ntico y tenemos una guerra en suelo europeo con una fuerza hostil a nuestras puertas.

驴C贸mo? Coordinando mejor nuestro gasto, creando capacidades europeas, gastando m谩s europeo con una base industrial europea y gastando m谩s en proporci贸n al reto que tenemos enfrente.

驴Para qu茅? Para tener una fuerza de disuasi贸n suficiente como para evitar la guerra, es decir, para proteger la paz, para proteger nuestras democracias y tambi茅n para tener una diplomacia y ser un actor global cre铆ble en el mundo.

Y, al mismo tiempo, no solo vale con cr茅ditos y presupuesto nacional, necesitamos recursos y canales financieros europeos para hacerlo, para asegurar que, sobre todo, no entra en competici贸n el gasto social con el gasto en defensa, algo que ser铆a un suicidio pol铆tico para Europa.听Y, al mismo tiempo, diversificar nuestras alianzas tambi茅n en materia de seguridad en un mundo crecientemente multipolar. Eso es una Europa aut贸noma.

听听Vilis Kri拧topans (PfE). 鈥� God膩tais s膿des vad墨t膩j! P膿d膿jos piecus gadus Eiropa ir r奴p膿jusies par s奴n膩m un odiem, bet cilv膿kus nezin k膩p膿c aizmirsusi. Eiropa ir ekonomiski atpalikusi un k募uvusi v膩ja bez strat膿模iska redz膿juma.

Pat tad, kad pirms trim gadiem Krievija iebruka Ukrain膩, m奴su l墨deri joproj膩m nesaprata vai negrib膿ja saprast, k膩d膩 situ膩cij膩 m膿s esam. Tikai tagad, kad amerik膩艈i ir par膩d墨ju拧i m奴su v膩jumu, m膿s kaut ko cen拧amies dar墨t.

Tagad tiek pazi艈ots par 800 miljardiem lielu ieguld墨jumu Eiropas dro拧墨b膩, bet t膩 ir tikai un vien墨gi iesp膿ja aiz艈emties. Vai m膿s gribam v膿l vienu infl膩cijas vilni? Vai m膿s gribam v膿l vair膩k samazin膩t Eiropas konkur膿tsp膿ju? Nekav膿jo拧i ir piln墨b膩 j膩atce募 za募ais kurss un visa nauda j膩novirza aizsardz墨bas industrijai. Ja m膿s to neizdar墨sim t奴l墨t, tad m膿s neizgl膩bsim ne klimatu, ne dro拧墨bu.

听听Adam Bielan (ECR). 鈥� Madam听President, the white paper and its implementation present a timely opportunity to ensure Europe's boosted commitments translate into real capabilities and enhance protection for our citizens.

The war in Ukraine has highlighted the consequences of inaction and overreliance on external partners for European defence. Beyond Ukraine, Europe has increasingly become the target of hybrid attacks and disinformation campaigns, directly threatening our political and economic stability.

But, despite all possible efforts, NATO remains the cornerstone of our security. If Europe needs to step up, any European-led initiatives must complement, not duplicate, NATO's role.

In its current form, the joint resolution is concerning. Instead of strengthening Europe's security, it promotes an alternative to NATO, undermines the autonomy of Member States in defence matters and risks deepening confrontation with the United States 鈥� our most important ally.

Instead, Europe must focus on real security: replenishing stockpiles, strengthening transatlantic ties and investing in credible deterrence.

听听Hilde Vautmans (Renew). 鈥� Voorzitter, commissaris Kubilius, dit is het belangrijkste debat van de geschiedenis, want op dit ogenblik hebben we 27听legers, 27听defensiebudgetten en 27听verschillende aankoopstrategie毛n. Nu zeggen we hier allemaal samen dat we meer gaan uitgeven aan defensie. Ik zeg dat hier al tien jaar. Dus zeg ik: ja, meer uitgeven, maar niet m茅茅r van hetzelfde. Het zal anders moeten, het zal samen moeten en het zal Europees moeten.

Ten tweede, commissaris, maakt u gebruik van artikel听122 van het Verdrag om het Parlement buitenspel te zetten. Van mij mag het, maar dat gaat de kwaliteit niet verbeteren. Een goed Europees defensiebeleid voer je niet in achterkamertjes.

Ten derde, commissaris, komt u volgende week met een witboek. Ik hoop dat het duidelijker en concreter is dan u vandaag bent geweest. Er moeten echt grote Europese programma鈥檚 in staan en een routekaart voor een Europees leger. Ook dit zeg ik hier al tien jaar. U wilt de geschiedenis ingaan? Wel, commissaris, maak die routekaart voor dat Europees leger, of u mist de afspraak met de geschiedenis.

听听Ville Niinist枚 (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Mr President, coming from a country that shares 1听300 kilometres of border with Russia and a country that has had over 50 wars or border skirmishes with Russia in its history, I must say to you that we must show respect to Ukraine that is protecting democracy today, every day, with their lives.

This is not a theoretical discussion about where Europe shall head. This is a very serious discussion about how we can protect the international rules-based order, the national sovereignty of countries, and the right of countries to determine their own fate. Russia and Putin do not believe in that. They want their empire, they want their sphere of influence, and they are building a war economy that is threatening Europe, but also countries outside of the EU.

By this paper 鈥� and I urge you, Commissioner, to be very strong and ambitious 鈥� we show that Europe is united, that we can invest in defence, we can create military capabilities where Europe is united and can also act alone without the support of the United States. And that is something that negates the threat of Russia and protects democracy and peace in Europe 鈥� that is what we must achieve.

听听螕喂蠋蟻纬慰蟼 螕蔚蠅蟻纬委慰蠀 (The Left). 鈥� 螝蠉蟻喂蔚 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 蟿蔚位喂魏维 胃伪 蟿慰 魏维谓蔚蟿蔚, 蔚;听螠苇蟽伪 伪蟺蠈 苇谓伪谓 蟺慰位蔚渭喂魏蠈 蟺伪蟻慰尉蠀蟽渭蠈, 胃伪 未伪蟺伪谓萎蟽蔚蟿蔚 800 未喂蟽., 蟺慰蠀 未蔚谓 蟿伪 苇蠂蔚蟿蔚, 纬喂伪 蟿畏 未萎胃蔚谓 魏慰喂谓萎 维渭蠀谓伪. 螠伪, 纬喂伪 谓伪 蠀蟺维蟻蠂蔚喂 魏慰喂谓萎 维渭蠀谓伪, 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 蠀蟺维蟻蠂蔚喂 魏伪喂 魏慰喂谓萎 蔚尉蠅蟿蔚蟻喂魏萎 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏萎. 螘未蠋 蠀蟺维蟻蠂慰蠀谓 蟺维蟻伪 蟺慰位位慰委 伪蟺蟻蠈胃蠀渭慰喂. 螝维谓蔚蟿蔚 蟺伪蟻维谓慰渭蔚蟼, 伪谓蟿喂-胃蔚蟽渭喂魏苇蟼 蟺伪蟻伪蟽蠀谓维尉蔚喂蟼 魏伪喂 伪谓伪魏畏蟻蠉蟽蟽蔚蟿蔚 蟿畏谓 韦慰蠀蟻魏委伪 蔚纬纬蠀畏蟿萎 蟿畏蟼 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎蟼 伪蟽蠁维位蔚喂伪蟼. 螡蟿蟻慰蟺萎! 螖萎胃蔚谓 纬喂伪 谓伪 蟽蟿畏蟻委尉蔚蟿蔚 蟿畏谓 螣蠀魏蟻伪谓委伪 魏伪喂 蟿慰谓 位伪蠈 蟿畏蟼.

螤苇蟽蟿蔚 蟿畏谓 伪位萎胃蔚喂伪, 蔚魏蔚委谓慰 蟺慰蠀 胃苇位蔚蟿蔚, 渭苇蟽伪 伪蟺蠈 苇谓伪 蠂蠀未伪委慰 蟺伪味维蟻喂 渭蔚 蟿慰蠀蟼 螒渭蔚蟻喂魏维谓慰蠀蟼, 蔚委谓伪喂 慰喂 蟽蟺维谓喂蔚蟼 纬伪委蔚蟼 魏伪喂 慰 蟺位慰蠉蟿慰蟼 蟿畏蟼 蠂蠋蟻伪蟼. 螤苇蟽蟿蔚, 蔚蟺喂蟿苇位慰蠀蟼, 蟿畏谓 伪位萎胃蔚喂伪. 螛伪 蟺蟿蠅蠂蔚蠉蟽蔚蟿蔚 蟿慰蠀蟼 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏慰蠉蟼 位伪慰蠉蟼 魏伪喂 胃伪 蟺位慰蠀蟿委蟽蔚蟿蔚 蟿慰蠀蟼 蔚渭蟺蠈蟻慰蠀蟼 蟿慰蠀 胃伪谓维蟿慰蠀, 纬喂伪 谓伪 魏喂谓萎蟽蔚蟿蔚 蟿喂蟼 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏苇蟼 慰喂魏慰谓慰渭委蔚蟼 渭苇蟽伪 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰蠀蟼 蔚尉慰蟺位喂蟽渭慰蠉蟼. 螇未畏 蟿慰 慰渭慰位慰纬萎蟽伪蟿蔚: 蠂苇蟻喂 蠂苇蟻喂 渭蔚 蟿慰 伪渭伪蟻蟿蠅位蠈 螡螒韦螣 胃伪 尾伪未委蟽蔚蟿蔚. 螤维蔚喂 蟺蔚蟻委蟺伪蟿慰, 尾苇尾伪喂伪, 魏伪喂 畏 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 伪蠀蟿慰谓慰渭委伪.

螝蠉蟻喂蔚 螘蟺委蟿蟻慰蟺蔚, 蟽蟺苇蟻谓蔚蟿蔚 伪谓苇渭慰蠀蟼 魏伪喂 慰喂 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏慰委 位伪慰委 胃伪 胃蔚蟻委蟽慰蠀谓 胃蠉蔚位位蔚蟼. 螚 渭蟺维位伪 蔚委谓伪喂 蟺位苇慰谓 蟽蟿伪 蟺蠈未喂伪 蟿蠅谓 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏蠋谓 位伪蠋谓. 螠蠈谓慰谓 伪蠀蟿慰委 渭蟺慰蟻慰蠉谓 谓伪 蟽伪蟼 蟽蟿伪渭伪蟿萎蟽慰蠀谓.

听听螡喂魏蠈位伪慰蟼 螒谓伪未喂蠋蟿畏蟼 (NI). 鈥� 螝蠉蟻喂蔚 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 魏伪蟿鈥� 伪蟻蠂维蟼 蟽蠀渭蠁蠅谓慰蠉渭蔚 渭蔚 蟿畏 未喂伪渭蠈蟻蠁蠅蟽畏 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎蟼 维渭蠀谓伪蟼, 蔚蠁蠈蟽慰谓 胃伪 蟿畏蟻蔚委蟿伪喂 蟿慰 伪蠀蟿慰谓蠈畏蟿慰, 蠈蟿喂 畏 蔚蟺委胃蔚蟽畏 蔚谓蠈蟼 魏蟻维蟿慰蠀蟼 渭苇位慰蠀蟼, 胃伪 蟽畏渭伪委谓蔚喂 蔚蟺委胃蔚蟽畏 蔚谓伪谓蟿委慰谓 蠈位蠅谓 蟿蠅谓 魏蟻伪蟿蠋谓 渭蔚位蠋谓. 螘位位维未伪 魏伪喂 螝蠉蟺蟻慰蟼 苇蠂慰蠀渭蔚 魏维胃蔚 位蠈纬慰 谓伪 蟽蠀渭蠁蠅谓慰蠉渭蔚 蟽蟿畏 蟽蠀谓未喂伪渭蠈蟻蠁蠅蟽畏 魏慰喂谓萎蟼, 渭蔚蟿伪尉蠉 蟿蠅谓 魏蟻伪蟿蠋谓 渭蔚位蠋谓, 维渭蠀谓伪蟼. 螤位畏谓 蠈渭蠅蟼, 蟺蟻蠋蟿慰谓, 蟽伪蠁萎蟼 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 蔚尉蠅蟿蔚蟻喂魏萎 魏伪喂 伪渭蠀谓蟿喂魏萎 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏萎 魏伪喂 未喂蟺位蠅渭伪蟿委伪 蔚委谓伪喂 蟺蟻慰伪蟺伪喂蟿慰蠉渭蔚谓慰. 螖蔚蠉蟿蔚蟻慰谓, 蟽蠀渭蠁蠅谓委伪 蠅蟼 蟺蟻慰蟼 蟿畏谓 伪蟻蠂萎 蟿畏蟼 蟽蠀位位慰纬喂魏萎蟼 维渭蠀谓伪蟼, 伪谓维位慰纬畏 蟿慰蠀 维蟻胃蟻慰蠀 5 蟿畏蟼 危蠀谓胃萎魏畏蟼 蟿慰蠀 螡螒韦螣, 蔚委谓伪喂 伪蟺伪蟻伪委蟿畏蟿畏. 韦蟻委蟿慰谓, 蔚蟺喂尾蔚尾位畏渭苇谓慰蟼, 蔚蟺委蟽畏蟼, 慰 蟺位萎蟻蠅蟼 胃蔚蟽渭慰胃蔚蟿畏渭苇谓慰蟼 蟿蟻蠈蟺慰蟼 蟽蠀渭渭蔚蟿慰蠂萎蟼 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏蠋谓 蟽蟿蟻伪蟿蔚蠀渭维蟿蠅谓 蟽蔚 蔚蟺喂蠂蔚喂蟻萎蟽蔚喂蟼 蠀蟺慰蟽蟿萎蟻喂尉畏蟼 蔚喂蟻萎谓畏蟼.

螝伪喂 蟿蟻委伪 魏伪委蟻喂伪 蔚蟻蠅蟿萎渭伪蟿伪:

螤蠋蟼 胃伪 纬委谓蔚蟿伪喂 畏 魏伪蟿伪谓慰渭萎 蟿蠅谓 伪渭蠀谓蟿喂魏蠋谓 未伪蟺伪谓蠋谓 纬喂伪 蟿畏 蠂蟻畏渭伪蟿慰未蠈蟿畏蟽畏 蟿蠅谓 魏蟻伪蟿蠋谓 渭蔚位蠋谓; 螒蟺伪蟻伪喂蟿萎蟿蠅蟼, 蟽蠀谓伪蟻蟿萎蟽蔚喂 蟺慰位位蠋谓 魏伪喂 蟽畏渭伪谓蟿喂魏蠋谓 蟺伪蟻伪纬蠈谓蟿蠅谓, 蠁伪谓蟿维味慰渭伪喂, 蠈蟺蠅蟼 蟿慰蠀 蟺位畏胃蠀蟽渭慰蠉 蟿蠅谓 魏蟻伪蟿蠋谓 渭蔚位蠋谓 魏伪喂 维位位蠅谓 喂未喂伪喂蟿蔚蟻慰蟿萎蟿蠅谓 蟿慰蠀蟼.

螛伪 蠀蟺维蟻蠂慰蠀谓 魏蟻维蟿畏 渭苇位畏 蟺慰蠀 胃伪 位维尾慰蠀谓 蟿畏 渭蔚蟻委未伪 蟿慰蠀 位苇慰谓蟿慰蟼; 螘位位维未伪 魏伪喂 螝蠉蟺蟻慰蟼 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 蔚蟺蠅蠁蔚位畏胃慰蠉谓 蟿伪 渭苇纬喂蟽蟿伪, 未蔚未慰渭苇谓蠅谓 蟿蠅谓 伪蠀尉畏渭苇谓蠅谓 伪谓伪纬魏蠋谓 位蠈纬蠅 纬蔚蠅纬蟻伪蠁喂魏萎蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼 胃苇蟽畏蟼 魏伪喂 纬蔚喂蟿谓委伪蟽畏蟼 渭蔚 蠂蠋蟻蔚蟼 蠈蟺蠅蟼 畏 韦慰蠀蟻魏委伪.

韦蔚位喂魏维, 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 维渭蠀谓伪 萎 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟿慰蠀蟻魏喂魏萎; 危伪蠁蠋蟼 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎, 蟽蔚 魏伪谓苇谓伪 渭苇蟻慰蟼 蟿畏蟼 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎蟼 维渭蠀谓伪蟼 魏伪喂 蟽蔚 魏伪渭委伪 伪渭蠀谓蟿喂魏萎 未伪蟺维谓畏 未蔚谓 胃伪 蟽蠀渭渭蔚蟿苇蠂蔚喂 畏 韦慰蠀蟻魏委伪. 螖蔚谓 胃伪 尾维位慰蠀渭蔚 蟿慰谓 位蠉魏慰 谓伪 蠁蠀位维蔚喂 蟿伪 蟺蟻蠈尾伪蟿伪.

听听Michael Gahler (PPE). 鈥� Mr President, colleagues, dear Commissioner, when the Lisbon Treaty entered into force, we began checking the potential of the treaty in the area of defence, starting with the costs of non-Europe in this policy area. Simply adding all national defence budgets showed how inefficient the expenditure was 鈥� almost no common planning, no common procurement. And since 2011, instead of making use of the single market on defence products, the abuse of Article 346, which made Member States step out of European spending.

Times have changed: there is war in Europe, Putin threatens all of us, and this US administration leaves doubt whether they will live up to their NATO commitments. That is why I thank the Commissioner for presenting this white paper on the future of European defence, together with the earlier announcement on the programme to ReArm Europe. Let us make the best out of it 鈥� let us defend our European way of life together and let us start on the front line, supporting Ukraine with whatever it takes as they defend their and our freedom. Slava Ukraini!

听听Lucia Annunziata (S&D). 鈥� Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, mentre discutiamo, giustamente la nostra decisione importantissima di preparare la difesa dell'Europa, Trump, Putin e Zelensky sono, mi sembra, totalmente impegnati, e molto attivi, a preparare il tavolo delle trattative.

Un tavolo, da cui ricordo, noi siamo stati espulsi senza neanche essere stati avvertiti, a meno che il ministro Lubilius non lo fosse stato. Questo 猫 un vulnus incredibile, 猫 il vero punto di queste trattative: tenere fuori l'Europa.

Allora, io vi domando: mentre prepariamo giustamente questo piano di difesa, non dobbiamo porci il problema e la priorit脿 di tornare a quel tavolo? Ministro, noi rischiamo oggi di fare un grande discorso militare ma di tenere fuori la politica a cominciare dal ruolo del Parlamento.

听听Alberico Gambino (ECR). 鈥� Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, il Libro bianco sul futuro della difesa europea rappresenta un'opportunit脿 cruciale per delineare una strategia chiara, realistica ed efficace. L'Europa deve rafforzare la propria capacit脿 difensiva, evitando, per貌, di duplicare la NATO o creare nuove sovrastrutture burocratiche prive di utilit脿.

L'Italia sostiene una difesa pi霉 forte e fondata su investimenti mirati, su un'industria competitiva nei settori strategici dello spazio, delle comunicazioni e dell'innovazione tecnologica. Investire nella sicurezza non significa alimentare una corsa al riarmo ma dare stabilit脿, autonomia strategica e crescita economica.

Ecco perch茅 il piano presentato dalla presidente von der Leyen, a mio avviso, deve essere rinominato come Defence Europe.

La sicurezza 猫 la vera garanzia di pace ed 猫 per questo che voglio stigmatizzare anche il comportamento di alcuni che si professano pacifisti solo per raccogliere pochi consensi senza pensare agli interessi nazionali.

Il Libro bianco deve essere l'occasione per costruire una difesa europea solida, rispettando le specificit脿 di ogni Stato membro, e rafforzare il ruolo dell'Europa nel mondo.

听听President. 鈥� The next speaker is Petras Au拧trevi膷ius. Congratulations on the independence of your country.

听听Petras Au拧trevi膷ius (Renew). 鈥� Mr President, thank you, it is indeed a special day. Commissioner Kubilius, Minister, dear colleagues, I must repeat myself, what I have written in my speech, sorry for certain repetitions. Exactly 35 years ago on this day, Lithuania declared the restoration of its independence. We knew about the evil Soviet Empire from our own painful experience, but we had no illusions about the better future of Russia.

Now, we must not only change our thinking and policies, but also defend Europe and our fellow Europeans. We must ensure European security, which is measured by the weakest link in its defence. Therefore, we must act together, not selectively. We must act now, not tomorrow.

Standardisation of weapons and military equipment, mobilisation of financial resources for their innovation, and speedy production and further development of military mobility and capabilities 鈥� these are the most important things now.

For the European defence community should involve our partners from the very beginning, especially candidate countries like Ukraine. Close cooperation in this area will undoubtedly benefit all participant countries and, most importantly, our citizens.

听听Mounir Satouri (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, Monsieur le Commissaire, chers coll猫gues, le monde que nous avons connu n鈥檈st plus. Celui dont le projet europ茅en a r锚v茅 ne na卯tra pas par magie, m锚me avec 800听milliards d鈥檈uros d鈥檌nvestissements dans l鈥檃rmement. L鈥檃rgent est indispensable, mais pas n鈥檌mporte comment. Il ne doit pas venir des fonds structurels ou des fonds agricoles. Il doit financer une industrie de d茅fense europ茅enne et garantir l鈥檌nterop茅rabilit茅 de nos forces, et non alimenter des int茅r锚ts 茅trangers. L鈥檃rgent seul ne suffit pas. Sans volont茅 politique et sans strat茅gie de d茅fense commune, ces milliards ne feront que servir les projets de Trump.

Notre strat茅gie doit reposer sur notre 茅mancipation de la d茅fense am茅ricaine et s鈥檃ppuyer sur une force europ茅enne permanente, dot茅e de son propre commandement et capable de d茅fendre nos int茅r锚ts et nos valeurs. Elle doit 锚tre fond茅e sur le respect du droit international, un droit que nous devons d茅fendre, de Gaza 脿 l鈥橴kraine. Notre place est aux c么t茅s des peuples qui se battent pour la justice. Nous aurions d没 锚tre aux c么t茅s de l鈥橝frique du Sud devant la Cour internationale de justice. Nous aurions d没 soutenir la Ligue arabe dans son plan de reconstruction de Gaza face au diktat de Trump.

L鈥橴nion europ茅enne ne peut plus rester spectatrice. Elle ne peut plus garder le silence sur les grandes initiatives de notre monde. Elle n鈥檃 plus le droit d鈥檃voir peur. Elle doit s鈥櫭﹎anciper et agir.

听听Marina Mesure (The Left). 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, Monsieur le Commissaire, penser l'avenir de la d茅fense de l鈥橴nion europ茅enne sans penser l'avenir de notre industrie de d茅fense est absurde. Penser l'avenir de notre industrie de d茅fense sans penser l'avenir des industries lourdes europ茅ennes est une voie sans issue. Prenons l鈥檈xemple de la sid茅rurgie: aux derni猫res nouvelles, pour produire des armes, nous avons besoin d鈥檃cier, sauf que les hauts fourneaux europ茅ens ferment les uns apr猫s les autres, faute de r茅gulation des prix de l鈥櫭﹏ergie et de protectionnisme. Ainsi, au moment m锚me o霉 nous discutons ici d鈥檃utonomie dans le domaine de la d茅fense, ArcelorMittal, qui est pourtant biberonn茅 aux aides publiques, pr茅voit de d茅localiser sa production en Inde, l脿 o霉 nous allons signer des accords de libre-茅change. Sans acier europ茅en, il ne peut y avoir d鈥檌ndustrie europ茅enne de d茅fense r茅ellement autonome, et sans industrie europ茅enne autonome, les 800听milliards d鈥檈uros annonc茅s par听Ursula听von听der听Leyen n鈥檃uront qu鈥檜n seul d茅bouch茅: celui de l鈥檌ndustrie militaire am茅ricaine.

Donnons-nous donc les moyens de cette autonomie, en changeant radicalement nos politiques industrielles et commerciales, en pr么nant moins de libre-茅change et plus de protectionnisme, et en achetant europ茅en.

听听Ruth Firmenich (NI). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, meine Damen und Herren! Die EU, die sich gerne als Friedensprojekt bezeichnet, will zur europ盲ischen NATO werden听鈥� 800听Milliarden听Euro sollen in Aufr眉stung flie脽en. Und genau wie die NATO ist die EU weder Verteidigungs- noch Wertegemeinschaft. Denn wo sind die europ盲ischen Werte, wenn es um Gaza geht? Wo sind sie, wenn die EU Wahlf盲lschung in Rum盲nien bejubelt? Und warum gab es nie eine Initiative der EU f眉r eine friedliche Beilegung in der Ukraine? Jetzt wollen Sie stattdessen den Stellvertreterkrieg in der Ukraine auch ohne die USA fortf眉hren.

Frieden gilt Ihnen als Verrat听鈥� das erinnert an George Orwell. Sie sagen Verteidigung und meinen Angriff. Sie sind dabei, einen Krieg gegen Russland vorzubereiten. Einige tr盲umen sogar von franz枚sischen Atomwaffen f眉r die EU, auch wenn die Reichweite der franz枚sischen Bomber nur bis Hannover langt. Die Zeit der Illusionen ist vorbei, sagte Frau von der Leyen heute. Dies sollte allerdings vor allem f眉r die hemmungslose Selbst眉bersch盲tzung der EU gelten, bei der man sich an das deutsche Kaiserreich erinnert f眉hlt. Die EU verkommt zum Europa der R眉stungskonzerne, f眉r deren Profite Sie 眉ber Leichen gehen. Die Kriegskredite m眉ssen gestoppt werden, wir brauchen Entspannungspolitik.

(Die Rednerin lehnt eine Frage nach dem Verfahren der 鈥瀊lauen Karte鈥� von Virginijus Sinkevi膷ius ab.)

听听Micha艂 Szczerba (PPE). 鈥� Panie Przewodnicz膮cy! Nie miejmy z艂udze艅. Za oceanem nast膮pi艂a zmiana paradygmat贸w, cho膰 bardzo nam si臋 to nie podoba, a m贸wi膮c wprost 鈥� jeste艣my w艣ciekli. Nigdy wcze艣niej tak bardzo nie potrzebowali艣my jedno艣ci i planu. Nigdy wcze艣niej nie byli艣my tak bardzo zdani na siebie. Za d艂ugo byli艣my zale偶ni od innych. Czas jazdy na gap臋 w wydatkach na obronno艣膰 si臋 sko艅czy艂. To, z czym si臋 mierzymy jako Europa, to deficyt bezpiecze艅stwa. To, co powinno nas po艂膮czy膰, to odpowiedzialno艣膰. Na nowo trzeba przedefiniowa膰 relacje transatlantyckie i sojusze, kt贸rych trwa艂o艣膰, ale te偶 wzajemne zobowi膮zania, nigdy wcze艣niej nie by艂y kwestionowane. Opuszczenie Ukrainy przez sojusznika i gwaranta jej integralno艣ci musi rozpocz膮膰 dyskusj臋 o ryzyku i konsekwencjach opuszczania Europy. Rosja rozpocz臋艂a wy艣cig zbroje艅. Europa musi na to odpowiedzie膰.

Deklaracja niezachwianego wsparcia dla Ukrainy musi wyra偶a膰 si臋 w konkretach. Potrzeba odwa偶nych dzia艂a艅, by to aktywa rosyjskie finansowa艂y obron臋 Ukrainy. Bia艂a ksi臋ga to mapa drogowa, kt贸rej musimy si臋 trzyma膰 konsekwentnie, odwa偶nie i hojnie. Musimy dozbroi膰 Europ臋. Musimy zabezpieczy膰 nasze granice. Musz膮 by膰 jak tarcza. Musimy zape艂ni膰 nasze magazyny i musimy wykorzysta膰 ten czas.听

Europe: stay the course.

听听Tobias Cremer (S&D). 鈥� Mr President, dear colleagues, Vance, Musk and Trump have achieved in just about one month what Stalin, Khrushchev and Putin have failed to do in 80 years: they have undermined the transatlantic alliance, they have surrendered America's claim to global leadership and dismantled the legacy of US presidents from FDR to Ronald Reagan.

I am a committed transatlanticist, and I still refuse to believe that this is the end. I still have faith that America will be back, but I also know that Europe cannot wait for that. This is why it is good that European leaders are finally waking up. It is good to invest EUR听800听billion in defence. It is good that countries like Germany are finally breaking free from self-imposed fiscal straitjackets.

But funds alone are not enough: we must anchor this investment in a broader security strategy, one that recognises that, in an era of hybrid warfare, social cohesion and resilience are just as vital for our security as tanks and drones. This white book offers the opportunity for us to do just that, to be a blueprint for a whole-of-society approach to defence. One that defends Europe, regardless of who is sitting in the White House.

听听螘渭渭伪谓慰蠀萎位 桅蟻维纬魏慰蟼 (ECR). 鈥� 螝蠉蟻喂蔚 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 蟿萎谓 蟺伪蟿蟻委未伪 慰峤愇� 峒愇晃�蟽蟽蠅 蟺伪蟻伪未蠋蟽蠅. 螘委谓伪喂 慰 蔚位位畏谓喂魏蠈蟼 蠈蟻魏慰蟼 蟺慰蠀 苇蟻蠂蔚蟿伪喂 伪蟺蠈 渭伪魏蟻喂维. 螖蔚谓 苇蠂慰蠀渭蔚 伪喂蠋谓喂蔚蟼 蠁喂位委蔚蟼. 螚 伪魏蔚蟻伪喂蠈蟿畏蟿伪 蟿畏蟼 蟺伪蟿蟻委未伪蟼 渭伪蟼 伪蟺慰蟿蔚位蔚委 蟺蟻慰伪喂蠋谓喂伪 蟺委蟽蟿畏. 螌位慰喂 伪谓蔚尉伪喂蟻苇蟿蠅蟼 苇蠂慰蠀渭蔚 蟽蠀渭蠁苇蟻慰谓 谓伪 纬委谓蔚喂 畏 畏位蔚魏蟿蟻喂魏萎 未喂伪蟽蠉谓未蔚蟽畏 螘位位维未伪蟼-螝蠉蟺蟻慰蠀. 韦慰 苇蟻纬慰 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 纬委谓蔚喂. 螕喂鈥� 伪蠀蟿蠈 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 蠀蟺维蟻蠂慰蠀谓 蟺位慰委伪 蠈位蠅谓 渭伪蟼, 伪蟺慰蟿蟻蔚蟺蟿喂魏维 纬喂伪 蟿慰蠀蟼 韦慰蠉蟻魏慰蠀蟼 蔚喂蟽尾慰位蔚委蟼 蟺慰蠀 胃苇位慰蠀谓 谓伪 蟺位萎尉慰蠀谓 苇谓伪 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏蠈 苇蟻纬慰 魏慰喂谓萎蟼 蠅蠁苇位蔚喂伪蟼. 螝伪谓苇谓伪 维位位慰 魏蟻维蟿慰蟼 渭苇位慰蟼 未蔚谓 苇蠂蔚喂 未蔚蠂胃蔚委 蟿苇蟿慰喂伪 蔚蟺喂胃蔚蟿喂魏萎 蔚谓苇蟻纬蔚喂伪.

螘委蟿蔚 渭伪蟼 伪蟻苇蟽蔚喂 蔚委蟿蔚 未蔚谓 渭伪蟼 伪蟻苇蟽蔚喂 畏 魏蠀尾苇蟻谓畏蟽畏 蟿蠅谓 螚螤螒, 未蔚谓 蠀蟺维蟻蠂蔚喂 慰蠉蟿蔚 苇谓伪蟼 蟽蔚 伪蠀蟿萎 蟿畏谓 伪委胃慰蠀蟽伪 蟺慰蠀 谓伪 未喂伪蠁蠅谓蔚委 蠈蟿喂 蟿慰 螡螒韦螣 蔚尉伪蟽胃蔚谓蔚委. 韦慰 魏蔚谓蠈 蟿慰 魏伪位蠉蟺蟿蔚喂 畏 危蠀谓胃萎魏畏 纬喂伪 蟿畏 位蔚喂蟿慰蠀蟻纬委伪 蟿畏蟼 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎蟼 螆谓蠅蟽畏蟼 蟽蟿慰 维蟻胃蟻慰 42 蟺伪蟻维纬蟻伪蠁慰蟼 7螄 畏 蟻萎蟿蟻伪 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 伪渭慰喂尾伪委伪 维渭蠀谓伪. 螁蟻伪 渭伪蟼 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰蠀谓 慰喂 蠀蟺慰未慰渭苇蟼 未喂蟺位萎蟼 蠂蟻萎蟽畏蟼. 螠伪蟼 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻蔚喂 畏 未蠀谓伪蟿蠈蟿畏蟿伪 谓伪蠀蟺萎纬畏蟽畏蟼 蟺蔚蟻喂蟽蟽蠈蟿蔚蟻蠅谓 蟺位慰委蠅谓 蟽蟿慰 苇未伪蠁蠈蟼 渭伪蟼. 螠伪蟼 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻蔚喂 蠈位慰蠀蟼 畏 蔚谓喂蟽蠂蠀渭苇谓畏 蟽蟿蟻伪蟿喂蠅蟿喂魏萎 魏喂谓畏蟿喂魏蠈蟿畏蟿伪, 纬喂伪 谓伪 蠀蟺蔚蟻伪蟽蟺喂蟽蟿慰蠉渭蔚 蟿蠅谓 螘位位萎谓蠅谓 蟿伪 喂蔚蟻维, 蠈蟺蠅蟼 蟿畏 螛蟻维魏畏, 蟿慰 螝伪蟽蟿蔚位位蠈蟻喂味慰, 蟿畏谓 螝维蟽慰 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 蟺蟻慰蟽蠅蟻喂谓维 蠀蟺蠈未慰蠀位畏 螒渭渭蠈蠂蠅蟽蟿慰. 危伪蟼 蔚蠀蠂伪蟻喂蟽蟿蠋.

听听Lucia Yar (Renew). 鈥� V谩啪en媒 p谩n predsedaj煤ci, kolegovia, kolegyne, priznajme si to a hovorme to u啪 nahlas. V Eur贸pe m谩me vojnu, ak煤 sme neza啪ili od 拧tyridsiatych rokov a pod tlakom novej geopolitickej situ谩cie hroz铆, 啪e sa naozaj skon膷铆 prehrou Ukrajiny. Vojna sa ale m么啪e posun煤钮 aj hlb拧ie do Eur贸py a presne o to Putinovi ide. Porazi钮 Ukrajinu, z铆ska钮 膷as na prezbrojenie a destabilizova钮 n谩s medzit媒m dezinform谩ciami. Koho potom obetujeme? Pobaltie, Po木sko, moje Slovensko?

Nem谩me desiatky rokov, mo啪no m谩me mesiace, aby sme vytvorili spolo膷n煤 obranu, ktor谩 Rusko odstra拧铆, ale presne o tom odstra拧en铆 je t谩to debata. O asert铆vnosti a o na拧ej jednote. A o tom by mala by钮 aj debata o bielej knihe. 脕no, bude n谩s to nie膷o st谩钮, ale bude to cena prevencie a udr啪ate木n茅ho mieru ur膷ite ni啪拧ia ako cena vojny. A aby zv媒拧en茅 n谩klady nepadli na t媒ch najbli啪拧铆ch, na to m谩me v Eur贸pskej 煤nii a v 膷lensk媒ch 拧t谩toch n谩stroje.

Tak啪e v膷era bolo neskoro. My sa mus铆me poisti钮 a invest铆cia do spolo膷nej bezpe膷nosti je na拧ou poistkou. Eur贸pa sa mus铆 br谩ni钮.

听听President. 鈥� Mr Sinkevi膷ius, happy Independence Day!

听听Virginijus Sinkevi膷ius (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Mr听President, dear Commissioner, dear colleagues, the upcoming white paper on the future of European defence is a crucial step. But the expectation is that it's going to be finally more than just a paper. It must be a real catalyst for action. We cannot afford to continue business as usual.

The security of our citizens and the integrity of our borders depend on our ability to act swiftly and decisively. We must accelerate our efforts to enhance interoperability among Member States' armed forces. This is not just about spending more on defence; it's about ensuring that our forces can work seamlessly together.

We need also to integrate our defence industries and streamline our procurement processes to avoid duplication and inefficiencies. We also should move beyond intergovernmental agreements and build a genuine European Defence Union.

Our support for Ukraine is not just a moral imperative. It's a strategic necessity. We must provide more arms and ammunition, expand training operations and integrate Ukraine's defence industry into our own.

In doing this, we must remember that our ultimate goal is peace. We are strengthening our defence to avoid war, protect our values and ensure that the EU remains a beacon of stability in the world.

听听螡喂魏蠈位伪蟼 桅伪蟻伪谓蟿慰蠉蟻畏蟼 (The Left). 鈥� 螝蠉蟻喂蔚 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 蠁委位蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蠁委位慰喂, 蟽蠀味畏蟿维渭蔚 纬喂伪 渭委伪 魏慰喂谓萎 维渭蠀谓伪 魏伪喂 渭委伪 魏慰喂谓萎 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏萎 伪蟽蠁维位蔚喂伪蟼 魏伪喂 维渭蠀谓伪蟼. 螚 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 螘蟺喂蟿蟻慰蟺萎 魏伪蟿伪胃苇蟿蔚喂 蟺蟻慰蟿维蟽蔚喂蟼 魏喂 蔚渭蔚委蟼 蔚未蠋 蟽萎渭蔚蟻伪 蟽蠀味畏蟿维渭蔚 蟿畏谓 魏慰喂谓萎 渭伪蟼 蟽蟿维蟽畏 蟽蟿伪 味畏蟿萎渭伪蟿伪 伪渭蠀谓蟿喂魏萎蟼 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏萎蟼. 螠慰蠀 蠁伪委谓蔚蟿伪喂 蠈蟿喂 渭伪蟼 未喂伪蠁蔚蠉纬蔚喂 蠈渭蠅蟼 魏维蟿喂 魏蟻委蟽喂渭慰: 蠈蟿喂 畏 维渭蠀谓伪 未蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 蟺伪蟻维 谓伪 蔚委谓伪喂 蟺伪蟻伪魏慰位慰蠉胃畏渭伪 渭委伪蟼 魏慰喂谓萎蟼 蔚尉蠅蟿蔚蟻喂魏萎蟼 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏萎蟼螄 蠈蟿喂 伪蟺慰蠁伪蟽委味蔚喂蟼 谓伪 蠀蟺蔚蟻伪蟽蟺喂蟽蟿蔚委蟼 魏维蟿喂 魏伪喂 未伪蟺伪谓维蟼 蠂蟻萎渭伪蟿伪, 蠈蟿伪谓 苇蠂蔚喂蟼 伪蟺慰蠁伪蟽委蟽蔚喂 蟺慰喂慰 蔚委谓伪喂 蟿慰 未喂伪魏蠉尾蔚蠀渭伪, 纬喂伪 谓伪 胃蠅蟻伪魏委蟽蔚喂蟼 蔚胃谓喂魏萎 魏蠀蟻喂伪蟻蠂委伪, 蔚胃谓喂魏萎 伪谓蔚尉伪蟻蟿畏蟽委伪 魏伪喂 魏维胃蔚 蟽蟺喂胃伪渭萎 蔚未伪蠁喂魏萎蟼 伪魏蔚蟻伪喂蠈蟿畏蟿伪蟼 蟿蠅谓 27 魏蟻伪蟿蠋谓 渭蔚位蠋谓.

螖蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻慰蠉渭蔚, 位慰喂蟺蠈谓, 伪纬伪蟺畏蟿慰委 蠁委位慰喂, 蟺蟻喂谓 伪魏蠈渭伪 蟽蟿伪胃渭委蟽慰蠀渭蔚 蟿伪 蔚蟺蠈渭蔚谓伪 尾萎渭伪蟿伪 渭喂伪蟼 魏慰喂谓萎蟼 蔚尉蠅蟿蔚蟻喂魏萎蟼 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏萎蟼, 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 慰蟺慰委伪 蔚委渭伪喂 蠀蟺苇蟻 魏伪喂 蟺喂蟽蟿蔚蠉蠅 蟽蟿畏谓 魏慰喂谓萎 渭伪蟼 蟽蟿维蟽畏 魏伪喂 蟿慰 魏慰喂谓蠈 渭伪蟼 渭苇位位慰谓 蟽蔚 伪蠀蟿萎 蟿畏谓 萎蟺蔚喂蟻慰, 谓伪 蟽蟺蔚蠉未慰蠀渭蔚 谓伪 尉慰未蔚蠉慰蠀渭蔚 蠂蟻萎渭伪蟿伪, 蠂蠅蟻委蟼 谓伪 苇蠂慰蠀渭蔚 魏伪蟿伪位萎尉蔚喂 蟽蟿慰谓 伪谓蟿喂魏蔚喂渭蔚谓喂魏蠈 蟽蟿蠈蠂慰. 危伪蟼 蔚蠀蠂伪蟻喂蟽蟿蠋.

听听Lukas Sieper (NI). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, werte Abgeordnete! Wenn wir 眉ber Verteidigung sprechen, dann sprechen wir 眉ber Krieg. Einen Krieg, der hoffentlich niemals kommt, aber einen Krieg, den nicht der durchschnittliche Abgeordnete hier, mit seinen 55听Jahren, f眉hren wird, sondern meine Generation. Meine Generation! Aber wenn es so weit kommt, dann garantiere ich Ihnen: Meine Generation, die mit Frieden und Freiheit aufgewachsen ist, wird sich diese Freiheit niemals nehmen lassen.

Wir werden unsere Union verteidigen, koste es, was es wolle. Wir werden an unseren K眉sten k盲mpfen, wir werden an unseren Grenzen k盲mpfen. Wir werden auf unseren Feldern und Stra脽en k盲mpfen, und wenn es sein muss, auf jedem H眉gel und in jedem Tal Europas. Denn Europa ist unsere Heimat, und f眉r unsere Heimat werden wir uns wehren. Wir wollen keinen Krieg, aber wenn es sein muss, dann werden wir f眉r unsere Freiheit k盲mpfen.

听听螔伪纬纬苇位畏蟼 螠蔚蠆渭伪蟻维魏畏蟼 (PPE). 鈥� 螝蠉蟻喂蔚 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 伪纬伪蟺畏蟿苇 螘蟺委蟿蟻慰蟺蔚 Kubilius, 蠂伪委蟻慰渭伪喂 蟺慰蠀 尾蟻委蟽魏蔚蟽伪喂 蟽萎渭蔚蟻伪 蔚未蠋 渭伪味委 渭伪蟼 蠅蟼 慰 蟺蟻蠋蟿慰蟼 螘蟺委蟿蟻慰蟺慰蟼 螁渭蠀谓伪蟼 蟿畏蟼 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎蟼 螆谓蠅蟽畏蟼, 纬喂伪蟿委, 蟽魏蔚蠁胃蔚委蟿蔚, 魏蠀蟻委蔚蟼 魏伪喂 魏蠉蟻喂慰喂 蟽蠀谓维未蔚位蠁慰喂, 蠈蟿喂 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰 2006, 畏 魏蠀尾苇蟻谓畏蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 螘位位维未伪蟼 蟿畏蟼 螡苇伪蟼 螖畏渭慰魏蟻伪蟿委伪蟼, 蟽蟿畏谓 慰蟺慰委伪 萎渭慰蠀谓 蠀蟺慰蠀蟻纬蠈蟼 螁渭蠀谓伪蟼, 味畏蟿慰蠉蟽蔚 蟿畏 未畏渭喂慰蠀蟻纬委伪 螘蟺喂蟿蟻蠈蟺慰蠀 螁渭蠀谓伪蟼, 蟿畏谓 蠀喂慰胃苇蟿畏蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 蟻萎蟿蟻伪蟼 未喂伪蠁蠀纬萎蟼 蟽蟿喂蟼 伪渭蠀谓蟿喂魏苇蟼 未伪蟺维谓蔚蟼 魏伪喂 渭喂伪 未蠉谓伪渭畏 伪蟺慰蟿蟻慰蟺萎蟼 魏伪喂 蟺蟻慰蟽蟿伪蟽委伪蟼. 螤蠋蟼 谓伪 渭畏谓 蠂伪委蟻慰渭伪喂, 位慰喂蟺蠈谓, 蟽萎渭蔚蟻伪, 蟺慰蠀 20 蠂蟻蠈谓喂伪 渭蔚蟿维, 渭蔚 纬蟻萎纬慰蟻慰蠀蟼 蟻蠀胃渭慰蠉蟼 蠀蟺慰蟿委胃蔚蟿伪喂, 畏 螆谓蠅蟽畏 蠀位慰蟺慰喂蔚委 蟿喂蟼 蟺蟻慰蟿维蟽蔚喂蟼 渭伪蟼 伪蠀蟿苇蟼. 螕喂鈥� 伪蠀蟿蠈 魏伪喂 蠂伪喂蟻蔚蟿委味蠅 蟿慰 蟽蠂苇未喂慰 蟿畏蟼 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎蟼 螘蟺喂蟿蟻慰蟺萎蟼, 蟿慰 慰蟺慰委慰 胃伪 未蠋蟽蔚喂 蟽蟿畏谓 螆谓蠅蟽畏 蟿畏谓 伪蠀蟿慰谓慰渭委伪 魏伪喂 伪谓蔚尉伪蟻蟿畏蟽委伪 蟿畏谓 慰蟺慰委伪 蠂蟻蔚喂维味蔚蟿伪喂 魏伪喂 蟿畏 未蠀谓伪蟿蠈蟿畏蟿伪 蟿畏蟼 蟺蟻慰蟽蟿伪蟽委伪蟼 蟿蠅谓 蟽蠀谓蠈蟻蠅谓 蟿畏蟼, 蟿伪 慰蟺慰委伪 未蔚谓 尾蟻委蟽魏慰谓蟿伪喂 渭蠈谓慰 蟽蟿畏谓 伪谓伪蟿慰位喂魏萎 蟺位蔚蠀蟻维, 伪位位维 魏伪喂 蟽蟿畏谓 蔚蠀蟻蠉蟿蔚蟻畏 蟺蔚蟻喂慰蠂萎 蟿畏蟼 螡慰蟿喂慰伪谓伪蟿慰位喂魏萎蟼 螠蔚蟽慰纬蔚委慰蠀, 蟿畏谓 慰蟺慰委伪 未蔚谓 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 尉蔚蠂谓慰蠉渭蔚 蟺慰蟿苇.

螝伪喂 纬喂伪 谓伪 蟿慰 尉蔚魏伪胃伪蟻委蟽慰蠀渭蔚: 畏 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏 未蔚谓 蔚委谓伪喂 畏 萎蟺蔚喂蟻慰蟼 蟿慰蠀 蟺慰位苇渭慰蠀. 螘委谓伪喂 蟿慰 魏苇谓蟿蟻慰 蟿畏蟼 蔚喂蟻萎谓畏蟼, 蟿畏蟼 伪谓维蟺蟿蠀尉畏蟼, 蟿畏蟼 蔚蠀畏渭蔚蟻委伪蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏蟼 蔚位蔚蠀胃蔚蟻委伪蟼. 螘委谓伪喂 纬蔚纬慰谓蠈蟼, 位慰喂蟺蠈谓, 蠈蟿喂 渭喂伪 蟺蔚蟻伪喂蟿苇蟻蠅 伪渭蠀谓蟿喂魏萎 魏伪喂 伪蟺慰蟿蟻蔚蟺蟿喂魏萎 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏萎 胃伪 未蠋蟽蔚喂 蟽蟿畏谓 螆谓蠅蟽萎 渭伪蟼 蟿畏 未蠀谓伪蟿蠈蟿畏蟿伪 谓伪 未蟻伪 蔚谓喂伪委伪 蟽蟿畏 未喂蔚胃谓萎 蟽魏畏谓萎, 谓伪 苇蠂蔚喂 蔚谓喂伪委伪 蔚尉蠅蟿蔚蟻喂魏萎 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏萎, 谓伪 苇蠂蔚喂 喂蟽蠂蠀蟻萎 蟺伪蟻慰蠀蟽委伪 蟽蟿慰 蟿蟻伪蟺苇味喂 蟿蠅谓 未喂伪蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿蔚蠉蟽蔚蠅谓 魏伪喂 谓伪 蟿畏 位伪渭尾维谓慰蠀谓 蟽慰尾伪蟻维 蠀蟺蠈蠄喂谓. 危伪蟼 蔚蠀蠂伪蟻喂蟽蟿蠋 蟺慰位蠉.

听听Elio Di Rupo (S&D). 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, Monsieur le Commissaire, l鈥檋istoire des civilisations nous enseigne qu鈥檌l n鈥檈xiste pas de puissance politique respect茅e sans une force militaire capable de d茅fendre son peuple. Dans votre strat茅gie, je pense que chaque euro investi dans la d茅fense doit l鈥櫭猼re en faveur de nos entreprises et de nos PME, ainsi que de nos ouvriers, employ茅s et ing茅nieurs qui y travaillent.

Qui dit s茅curit茅 des peuples dit aussi s茅curit茅 sociale. D茅fense et s茅curit茅 sociale vont de pair 鈥撎齦utte contre la pauvret茅, logement, sant茅, retraites, et j鈥檈n passe鈥�

Enfin, Monsieur le Commissaire, pensez-vous vraiment qu'il soit possible de construire une Europe de la d茅fense avec 27听pays? Vu l'urgence, ne faudrait-il pas inciter un groupe restreint d鈥櫭塼ats membres 脿 aller de l鈥檃vant 脿 ce sujet, comme nous l鈥檃vions fait pour Schengen?

听听Rihards Kols (ECR). 鈥� God膩tais s膿des vad墨t膩j! Eiropas aizsardz墨bai ir vajadz墨gas skaidras priorit膩tes un str膩d膩jo拧i meh膩nismi. Eiropas p膩rapbru艈o拧ana nevar balst墨ties tikai uz papla拧in膩tu aizdevumu iesp膿ju pied膩v膩拧anu. Ir dal墨bvalstis, kas jau gadiem b奴tiski audz膿 savu aizsardz墨bas finans膿jumu krietni virs minim膩l膩 l墨me艈a, un tas tiek dar墨ts uz nacion膩lo bud啪etu r膿姆ina. Papildus 150 miljardiem aizdevumos j膩ievie拧 ar墨 grantu meh膩nismi, lai vair膩k atbalst墨tu t膩s valstis, kas jau dara vair膩k, gan dotu stimulu starpvalstu kop墨giem iepirkumiem. Nosakot kvantitat墨vus krit膿rijus un sniedzot tie拧us stimulus, mudin膩s valstis veikt kop墨gus iepirkumus, kas attiec墨gi veicin膩s liel膩kas invest墨cijas kop膿j膩 dro拧墨b膩 un nodro拧in膩s ieg膩d膩t膩 bru艈ojuma un tehnikas savienojam墨bu un savietojam墨bu, kas ir neap拧aub膩ma priorit膩te.

Mums ir j膩izmanto t膩s priek拧roc墨bas, ko sniedz Ukrainas aizsardz墨bas industrija 鈥� Ukrainas att墨st墨t膩s milit膩r膩s tehnolo模ijas jau ir pier膩d墨ju拧as sevi kaujas lauk膩. Iep膿rkot bru艈ojumu no Ukrainas, m膿s pal墨dzam ne tikai t膩s ekonomikai, bet ar墨 invest膿jam sav膩 dro拧墨b膩.

Aizdevuma pl膩ns ir iez墨m膿ts 膷etriem gadiem. Sagaidu, ka paredz膿tie un papildu finan拧u avoti b奴s dal墨bvalst墨m pieejami t奴l墨t膿ji, nevis kaut kad gada beig膩s.

听听Bart Groothuis (Renew). 鈥� Mr President, Commissioner, having heard the President of the Commission and the President of the Council this morning, and you, dear Commissioner, just now, I worry that we got it wrong, at least partially.

It's not about rearming individual countries, as in the Cold War. That would be insufficient, as it does not deter our adversaries. It is about collective rearming into an alliance which is able to compete with the deterrence that NATO had in the 1980s. That is the task.

For Europe, this requires delivering strategic enablers to operate on a divisional level, Commissioner, and the majority of those enablers are currently being paid for and operated by the US, which is still our ally. But Europe needs to develop or buy such enablers ourselves now.

Secondly, continental Europe is much bigger than the European Union. So the solution when it comes to a solid security architecture should, therefore, also include the UK, Norway, Turkey, Iceland, even Canada in a European security council 鈥� of which nothing has been mentioned. The industrial policy in the white paper should follow this security architecture. I ask you to take this on board, dear Commissioner, and get it right this time.

听听Benedetta Scuderi (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, "ReArm EU": ma quando ci siamo disarmati? Spendiamo in armi pi霉 di Russia e Cina; eppure nessuno si sente al sicuro. E invece di coordinarci, ora vogliamo gettare altre risorse in un sistema disfunzionale, legandoci a un'economia di guerra con sussidi per i gi脿 alti profitti dell'industria militare.

Trump e Putin ridono della nostra disorganizzazione e ci impongono le loro regole: un'Europa sempre pi霉 povera, disorganizzata, priva di una governance politica e una difesa comune 猫 ci貌 che vogliono e che gli stiamo consegnando con la nostra idea di difesa: 800 miliardi per 27 eserciti, senza una missione comune e senza vaglio del Parlamento.

Pi霉 sicurezza 猫 una governance unica e democratica, non 27; interoperabilit脿, non altre armi; infrastrutture, diritti, welfare e rinnovabili, non tagliare questi investimenti; diplomazia, corpi di pace, nuovi alleati, non escalation dei conflitti.

Nasciamo per costruire la pace: non sono le nostre armi a fare paura ma il nostro potenziale come unione politica, federale e democratica. Spinelli diceva: un'Europa unita 猫 il miglior modo per garantire libert脿 e pace.

(L'oratrice accetta di rispondere a una domanda "cartellino blu")

听听Marta Wcis艂o (PPE), pytanie zadane przez podniesienie niebieskiej kartki. 鈥� M贸wi Pani o dyplomacji? M贸wi Pani o pokoju, o demokracji? A s艂ysza艂a Pani dzisiaj kobiety z Ukrainy, z Bia艂orusi? S艂ysza艂a Pani o gwa艂tach? S艂ysza艂a Pani o gwa艂cie na 4-letniej dziewczynce? W jakiej rzeczywisto艣ci Pani 偶yje? Chce Pani 500 mln obywateli Unii Europejskiej nara偶a膰? We藕mie kto艣 za to odpowiedzialno艣膰? Czy Pani wie, co czuj膮 obywatele w Europie Wschodniej? Bo ja z takiej pochodz臋. Skoro Pani nie wie, to niech Pani przyjedzie i z nimi porozmawia.

听听Benedetta Scuderi (Verts/ALE), blue-card answer. 鈥� Thank you for your question. Have I ever said that? Have I ever said that we shouldn't have a common defence? Have I ever said that Europe should not try to build a common defence and a defence that is democratic? I have not said that. I've just said that we spend on weapons already, but we do not co-ordinate weapons. We do not have energy security, we do not have energy independence. If we got cut out from US and Russia, which is happening at the moment, and we do not invest in our welfare and in our energy, how do we make defence? We cannot make defence 鈥� we need a union, we need to invest in our people, we need to invest in a Europe, but especially we need to have a more democratic and federal Union. Otherwise the dream of Europe will go away from our population 鈥� and if that goes, no one will fight for Europe.

听听Pekka Toveri (PPE). 鈥� Madam President, dear colleagues, some people in this plenary question the need for defence investments. Either they say that we should try diplomacy or that Russia is not a threat 鈥� both are wrong. Russia has broken the Minsk agreements and other agreements hundreds of times and it is well recorded. We can't trust Russia. Diplomacy won't work.

Those who say that Russia is not a threat normally come from countries that has not been attacked, occupied, raped and pillaged dozens of times through history like Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and many other countries have. Don't lecture us about peaceful Russia, we know better!

Europe has finally 鈥� after decades of inaction 鈥� started to take the right steps towards our security and defence. Let us continue on this path.

I have three children, all in the Finnish army reserves, ready to defend us all. I want them to be properly equipped to do that. We must and we can afford to do that. Otherwise, saying that is not true, it is a lie.

And to those who claim that Russia's defence budget is much smaller than Europe's, please Google purchasing power parity and the Russian defence budget 鈥� you will be surprised.

(The speaker agreed to take a blue-card question)

听听Merja Kyll枚nen (The Left), blue-card question. 鈥� Diplomacy really did not help Finland when our neighbour Russia decided to come across the border.

The US has also been a long-term partner, but now it seems that President Trump is using the divide-and-rule model known since Roman times to get China off Russia's side to divide Europe and oppress others under its own power.

One should not side with those who dream of Tsarist power or world empire. Mr听Toveri, how do we find European cooperation and understand that the situation is that only a united and strong Europe, which covers its powers in all areas of activity, will survive?

听听President. 鈥� Excuse me, colleagues, blue cards are not an occasion for a speech in itself. Please stick to the question.

听听Pekka Toveri (PPE), blue-card answer. 鈥� Thank you for the good question. I think we are living in very dangerous times, and this won't end in one year or two years, or not even in President听Trump's term, it will continue for decades.

So Europe has to grow up and be strong 鈥� both economically and militarily 鈥� so that we can take care of our own independently, hopefully with good cooperation with the United States some time after Trump's term. But if not, we still have to be able to do it independently. We have people, we have money, we have innovation. We can do it.

听听Costas Mavrides (S&D). 鈥� Mr President, for years, very few of us were arguing in favour of European defence as a necessary step towards European autonomy.

Today, almost everyone supports it, and we recently reached European conclusions with reference to the defence of all EU borders, from the northeast down to the south and eastern Mediterranean.

But these EU borders are violated by the neo-Ottoman Turkey that occupies part of Cyprus. Currently, neo-Ottoman Turkey occupies also part of Syria and Iraq, it has a military presence in Libya and beyond. This neo-Ottoman Turkey has illegally intervened in the eastern Mediterranean, violating the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea against two EU Member States.

Paradoxically, though, the neo-Ottoman Turkey is considered an ally more than a threat. In fact, the Presidents of the Council and of the Commission had a teleconference the day after the conclusions to brief our partners, including Erdo臒an, about European defence.

Mr Commissioner, this is hypocrisy in action. It divides us, and I strongly believe that it will not fool this House, neither the EU citizens.

听听Beata Szyd艂o (ECR). 鈥� Panie Przewodnicz膮cy! Panie Komisarzu! Wojna toczy si臋 tu i teraz i te dzia艂ania, kt贸re musimy podj膮膰, musimy podejmowa膰 natychmiast. Oczywi艣cie rozmowa na temat przysz艂o艣ci obronnej i bezpiecze艅stwa Europy jest konieczna i dobrze, 偶e ona si臋 toczy. Ale, Szanowni Pa艅stwo, czy pami臋tacie szczyt w Wersalu w 2022 roku? Przecie偶 wtedy r贸wnie偶 by艂y dyskusje na temat, co zrobi膰, 偶eby zwi臋kszy膰 mo偶liwo艣ci obronne Europy. Po trzech latach stoimy w tym samym miejscu. No, mo偶e r贸偶nica jest taka, 偶e w mi臋dzyczasie gospodarczo Europa straci艂a konkurencyjno艣膰, a europejski przemys艂 ci臋偶ki, praktycznie znikn膮艂. Wi臋c gdzie jeste艣my w tej chwili?

Ci wszyscy, kt贸rzy my艣l膮, 偶e mo偶emy sobie poradzi膰 bez NATO i ci wszyscy, kt贸rzy pr贸buj膮 w tej chwili obra偶a膰 si臋 na Stany Zjednoczone, pope艂niaj膮 ogromny b艂膮d. Trzeba wyci膮ga膰 wnioski, trzeba i艣膰 do przodu. Polski prezydent Andrzej Duda zaproponowa艂 polskiemu rz膮dowi, a偶eby zmieni膰 konstytucj臋 i wpisa膰 4% PKB z polskiego bud偶etu jako gwarantowane 艣rodki na obron臋, mimo 偶e Polska ju偶 wydaje 5% PKB. Mam nadziej臋, 偶e polski rz膮d przyjmie t臋 propozycj臋, 偶e wi臋kszo艣膰 rz膮dowa przyjmie t臋 propozycj臋, i mam nadziej臋, 偶e inne pa艅stwa cz艂onkowskie NATO zrozumiej膮, 偶e trzeba wywi膮zywa膰 si臋 ze swoich zobowi膮za艅, 偶eby Europa by艂a bezpieczna.

听听Engin Eroglu (Renew). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, sehr geehrter Herr Kommissar Kubilius! Wir haben heute tats盲chlich eine sehr wichtige und historische Diskussion, und ich w眉nsche Ihnen sehr viel Kraft. Ich glaube, Sie sind der richtige Kommissar zur richtigen Zeit, und ja, wir brauchen auch einen starken Kommissar im Bereich der Verteidigung, denn wir gerade deutschen Abgeordneten haben mit Frau von der Leyen im Bereich der Verteidigung keine guten Erfahrungen gemacht. In diesem Sinne st盲rken wir Ihnen den R眉cken, und bitte entt盲uschen Sie uns nicht.

Wenn ich dann hier die Reden h枚re von der extremen Rechten und der extremen Linken, wie die uns unterstellen, dass wir als Europ盲er Krieg wollen, dann wird mir wirklich schlecht. Wenn man sich das anschaut, wie historisch vergesslich diese Kollegen sind, von linker und rechter Seite, dann sollten diese Kollegen mal weniger TikTok schauen, damit ihr Wissen nicht begrenzt auf 30 oder 60听Sekunden ist, sondern sollten einfach mal ein bisschen mehr in den Geschichtsb眉chern lesen.

Wladimir Putin hat unmittelbar nach seiner ersten Wahl zum Pr盲sidenten von Russland die Tschetschenen angegriffen, 1999. Dieser Mann t枚tet seit 1999, seit 25听Jahren, Menschen auf diesem Kontinent und an den Grenzen seines Kontinents und auch indirekt in Afrika mit seiner Wagner鈥慓ruppe und auch stellvertretend in Syrien und 眉berall woanders. Wir m眉ssen verteidigungsf盲hig werden, um diesen Mann endlich zu stoppen, damit er wei脽: So geht es nicht weiter! All seinen Nachfolgern, wenn er mal beim lieben Gott ist, m眉ssen wir auch ein Zeichen setzen.

听听Mark茅ta Gregorov谩 (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Pane p艡edsedaj铆c铆, Evropa zbroj铆, ne z touhy po v谩lce, ale proto啪e agresor na V媒chod臎 vra啪d铆 na拧e sousedy a p艡谩tele a n臎kdej拧铆 spojenec na Z谩pad臎 se od n谩s odvrac铆. Ano, mocensk茅 uspo艡谩d谩n铆 star茅 osmdes谩t let kon膷铆 a v tom nov茅m se o svou bezpe膷nost mus铆me postarat sami. Dosp臎t. Je to historick媒 moment evropsk茅 nez谩vislosti a bohu啪el jsme pozadu. Mluv铆 se o stovk谩ch miliard eur na obranu, ale chyb铆 konkr茅tn铆 pl谩ny. My nepot艡ebujeme nutn臎 dal拧铆 rezoluce a to, co je v t茅 b铆l茅 knize, u啪 d谩vno v铆me. Dokonce nepot艡ebujeme ani dal拧铆 summity.

To, co nyn铆 urgentn臎 pot艡ebujeme, jsou investice hodn茅 glob谩ln铆ho hr谩膷e s 15trilionovou ekonomikou. Mus铆me autorit谩艡暖m po cel茅m sv臎t臎 uk谩zat na拧i skute膷nou ekonomickou s铆lu a akceschopnost. Tohle je n谩拧 moment. No a mus铆me jednat okam啪it臎. M谩me-li v暖bec n臎jak媒 膷as, je to 膷as, kter媒 n谩m sv媒mi 啪ivoty vykupuj铆 ukrajin拧t铆 obr谩nci. Mysleme na to! Sl谩va Ukrajin臎 a sl谩va Evrop臎!

听听Alice Teodorescu M氓we (PPE). 鈥� Herr talman! Kommission盲r Kubilius! Vi m氓ste prata om elefanten i rummet. R盲cker Europas befintliga k盲rnvapen f枚r att avskr盲cka v盲rldens st枚rsta k盲rnvapenmakt, Ryssland, 盲ven utan USA i ryggen? I听dag innehar USA och Ryssland tillsammans 枚ver 90听%, motsvarande drygt 5听000 stridsspetsar var, av den samlade k盲rnvapenarsenalen. I Europa har Frankrike och Storbritannien k盲rnvapen motsvarande 515 stridsspetsar tillsammans.

Ukraina ingick Budapestuppg枚relsen 1994, varp氓 man gav upp sina k盲rnvapen. I geng盲ld f枚rs盲krade Ryssland att inte anv盲nda v氓ld eller hota Ukrainas territoriella integritet och politiska sj盲lvst盲ndighet. Ryssland bryter det l枚ftet varje dag. Vi f氓r inte vara naiva. Om vi inte vill riskera att Putins er枚vringskrig forts盲tter l盲ngre in i Europa 鈥� i ett l盲ge d盲r Trumps uttalanden v盲cker fr氓gor kring USA:s lojalitet och intressen 鈥� beh枚ver vi skaffa oss en egen trov盲rdig avskr盲ckningsf枚rm氓ga, vilket i klartext betyder en st枚rre k盲rnvapenarsenal.

I en perfekt v盲rld hade vi inte haft n氓gra k盲rnvapen. Men s氓 l盲nge som den europeiska avskr盲ckningsf枚rm氓gan i praktiken bygger p氓 amerikansk f枚rm氓ga 盲ger inte vi v氓r egen s盲kerhet.

听听Tonino Picula (S&D). 鈥� Mr President, Mr Commissioner, dear colleagues, four years ago, many expected that NATO would be back to business as usual, and that Trump was a one-time incident. We also had the strategic compass drafted.

Unfortunately, the turbulent developments of today鈥檚 world show us how that expectation was wrong, and how we cannot take things for granted anymore.

Strengthening our collective defence to respond to all kinds of threats in the current circumstances is a must. The responsibility we bear to our citizens is something we cannot betray. We have to provide the right incentives to fully develop our autonomous security and build the European Defence Union.

At the same time, funding should not come at expense of our successful social and cohesion policies, which is why we need a viable investment strategy.

Finally, you cannot choose your neighbours, but you can choose your friends. This is also an opportunity for the European Union to strengthen foreign and security ties with like-minded allies and partners all over the world.

听听Gheorghe Piperea (ECR). 鈥� Domnule pre葯edinte, securitatea 葯i stabilitatea financiar膬 ne sunt puse la grea 卯ncercare acum, dup膬 lupta ineficient膬 cu criza financiar膬 葯i cu pandemia 葯i e葯ecul ambi葲iilor climatice ira葲ionale ale birocra葲iei Uniunii Europene. Prelungirea r膬zboiului g膬se葯te 葯i Uniunea, 葯i statele membre sl膬bite economic, vl膬guite 葯i vulnerabile politic. Planul militar al Uniunii Europene prevede mobilizarea a 800 de miliarde 卯n urm膬torii patru ani pentru a 卯nt膬ri capacit膬葲ile de ap膬rare ale Europei. O idee bun膬 卯n sine.

Circa 650 de miliarde vor fi culese de la statele membre ale Uniunii, care vor fi nevoite s膬-葯i creasc膬 bugetele ap膬r膬rii 葯i s膬 se 卯mprumute. Alte 150 de miliarde vor fi acoperite din noi facilit膬葲i de 卯mprumut, cu dob芒nd膬. Majoritatea fabricilor de armament sunt acum 卯nchise 卯n 葲膬ri ca Rom芒nia pe motiv de decarbonizare a economiei. Ne vom 卯mprumuta pentru a importa armament. Rom芒nia are cea mai lung膬 grani葲膬 cu Ucraina, deci va avea 葯i cel mai mare cost militar relativ la PIB. Efectele? Supra卯ndatorare 葯i dezechilibru economic. A葯adar, cui profit膬 acest plan?

听听Helmut Brandst盲tter (Renew). 鈥� Sehr geehrter Herr Pr盲sident, sehr geehrter Herr Kommissar, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Wir, meine Generation, wir sind die gl眉cklichste Generation, die in Europa, im freien Europa aufgewachsen ist. Und es ist die Verantwortung unserer Generation und derer, die nachher auch die Freiheit bekommen haben, f眉r die n盲chsten Generationen daf眉r zu sorgen, dass sie auch in Frieden und Freiheit leben k枚nnen. Ich sage immer: Wir haben nichts daf眉r getan, aber jetzt m眉ssen wir etwas daf眉r tun, dass wir auch f眉r die n盲chsten Generationen Europa verteidigen k枚nnen听鈥� und das k枚nnen wir nur gemeinsam machen. Das k枚nnen wir nur gemeinsam machen.

Und dann hei脽t es manchmal: Ja, Russland ist schwach, was sollen uns die schon tun? Der Kollege Eroglu hat schon sehr deutlich gesagt: Die Brutalit盲t von Putin m眉ssen wir bedenken听鈥� seit 1999 mordet er Leute; wir haben heute geh枚rt, wie die Menschen in der Ukraine unter ihm leiden. Und er droht ja auch uns, und das wollen viele bei uns nicht zur Kenntnis nehmen, und das ist das Traurige.

Es gibt auch Desinformation, da sind die sehr gut. Und leider sitzen auch in diesem Haus听鈥� jetzt eh nicht mehr, die sind schon woanders听鈥� viele Leute, die bei der Desinformation Putins mitmachen, die das, was er auf Russisch sagt, hier auf Deutsch, Englisch, andere Sprachen 眉bersetzen und uns damit gef盲hrden. Dagegen m眉ssen wir uns auch wehren.

听听Juan Ignacio Zoido 脕lvarez (PPE). 鈥� Se帽or presidente, se帽or comisario, tras unas semanas de tormenta geopol铆tica, pocos dudan ya de que necesitamos una defensa europea s贸lida, conjunta y bien financiada. Sin embargo, todav铆a hay algunos, desde la izquierda, que presentan una dicotom铆a tan falsa como peligrosa: o invertimos en hospitales o invertimos en tanques. Que pregunten a los ucranianos, que sufrieron cientos de bombardeos y ciberataques en sus hospitales, a ver qu茅 opinan de su dicotom铆a.

Se帽or铆as, poner a la opini贸n p煤blica en esta encrucijada es, adem谩s de un intento por infantilizarla, una irresponsabilidad en un momento cr铆tico para nuestras democracias. El futuro de la defensa europea exigir谩 esfuerzo, como nuevas partidas presupuestarias, un mejor aprovechamiento de los recursos existentes y una cooperaci贸n m谩s estrecha con nuestros socios.

Pero nadie est谩 hablando aqu铆 de eliminar la protecci贸n social, las pensiones o la sanidad. Por mucho que digan S谩nchez y Zapatero, ni nos sobra el Ministerio de Defensa ni nos sobra el Ej茅rcito. La inversi贸n en defensa no solo es necesaria, sino que es el mejor escudo para poder seguir disfrutando del Estado del bienestar.

听听Jean-Marc Germain (S&D). 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, Monsieur le Commissaire, chers coll猫gues, l鈥橢urope de la d茅fense, enfin! Il aura fallu l鈥檃gression militaire de Poutine contre l鈥橴kraine; il aura fallu les ing茅rences 茅trang猫res; il aura fallu les cyberattaques; il aura fallu les sabotages; enfin, il aura fallu le l芒chage de Trump. Il fallait r茅agir vite, et ce fut fait.

Nous accueillons positivement le plan de la Commission, mais le compte n鈥檡 est pas. ReArm Europe repose bien trop sur les 脡tats membres; en effet, m锚me 脿 supposer que les 650听milliards d鈥檈uros attendus soient au rendez-vous, sans davantage d鈥檈mprunt commun, sans davantage de recours 脿 un budget europ茅en dot茅 de ressources nouvelles, sans utiliser les 200听milliards d鈥檃voirs russes gel茅s, nous pouvons dire adieu 脿 la cadence acc茅l茅r茅e, 脿 l鈥檌nterop茅rabilit茅 et au bouclier antimissiles et antidrones; nous pouvons dire adieu 脿 la protection nucl茅aire fran莽aise 茅tendue et 脿 l鈥檃utonomie strat茅gique. Davantage d鈥橢urope dans la d茅fense, voil脿 le chemin d鈥檜ne d茅fense de l鈥橢urope sans les 脡tats-Unis.

Enfin, Monsieur le Commissaire, nous vous demandons solennellement de renoncer 脿 puiser dans les fonds de coh茅sion pour financer l鈥檈ffort de d茅fense. C鈥檈st notre ligne rouge sociale pour votre livre blanc sur la d茅fense. On ne b芒tira pas la force de l鈥橢urope sur l鈥檃ffaiblissement de son peuple.

听听螕蔚维未畏蟼 螕蔚维未畏 (ECR). 鈥� 螝蠉蟻喂蔚 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 苇蠂蠅 未畏位蠋蟽蔚喂 尉伪谓维 蠈蟿喂 畏 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺维胃蔚喂伪 纬喂伪 魏慰喂谓萎 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 维渭蠀谓伪 伪蟺慰蟿蔚位蔚委 慰蟻胃蠈 尾萎渭伪, 蟽蠀谓蔚蟺蔚委伪 蟿蠅谓 纬蔚蠅蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏蠋谓 蔚尉蔚位委尉蔚蠅谓. 螘蟺喂尾维位位蔚蟿伪喂 伪谓维蟺蟿蠀尉畏 蔚谓蠈蟼 蟺位萎蟻蠅蟼 喂魏伪谓慰蠉 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏慰蠉 蟺蠀位蠋谓伪 蟿慰蠀 螡螒韦螣, 慰 慰蟺慰委慰蟼 胃伪 蔚委谓伪喂 蟽蔚 胃苇蟽畏 谓伪 蔚谓蔚蟻纬蔚委 伪蠀蟿蠈谓慰渭伪 蠈蟺慰蟿蔚 蠂蟻蔚喂维味蔚蟿伪喂 魏伪喂 胃伪 渭蔚蟿伪蟿蟻苇蟺蔚喂 蟿喂蟼 未喂伪魏畏蟻蠉尉蔚喂蟼 纬喂伪 伪位位畏位蔚纬纬蠉畏 渭蔚蟿伪尉蠉 蟿蠅谓 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏蠋谓 魏蟻伪蟿蠋谓 伪蟺蠈 位蠈纬喂伪 蟽蔚 蟺蟻维尉蔚喂蟼. 危蠀味畏蟿蠋谓蟿伪蟼 蠈渭蠅蟼听纬喂伪 蟿慰 渭苇位位慰谓 蟿畏蟼 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎蟼 维渭蠀谓伪蟼, 未蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蠋 谓伪 蟺伪蟻伪位蔚委蠄蠅 蠈蟿喂 蔚委未伪渭蔚 蟿畏谓 韦慰蠀蟻魏委伪 魏伪位蔚蟽渭苇谓畏 蟽蟿畏 蟽蠀谓维谓蟿畏蟽畏 蟽蟿慰 螞慰谓未委谓慰 蟽蟿喂蟼 2 螠伪蟻蟿委慰蠀 魏伪喂 蟿慰谓 蟽慰蠀位蟿维谓慰 螘蟻谓蟿慰纬维谓 谓伪 未畏位蠋谓蔚喂 渭蔚 胃蟻维蟽慰蟼 蟺蠅蟼 畏 谓苇伪 伪蟻蠂喂蟿蔚魏蟿慰谓喂魏萎 维渭蠀谓伪蟼 蟿畏蟼 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏蟼 未蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 渭畏谓 蟺蔚蟻喂位伪渭尾维谓蔚喂 蟿畏谓 韦慰蠀蟻魏委伪.

螝蠀蟻委蔚蟼 魏伪喂 魏蠉蟻喂慰喂, 畏 伪蟺维谓蟿畏蟽畏 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 蔚委谓伪喂 蟽伪蠁萎蟼. 螌蠂喂 渭蠈谓慰 畏 韦慰蠀蟻魏委伪 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 渭蔚委谓蔚喂 渭伪魏蟻喂维 伪蟺蠈 蟿畏谓 伪蟽蠁维位蔚喂伪 蟿畏蟼 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏蟼, 蠈蟿伪谓 蟿慰 渭蠈谓慰 蟺慰蠀 蟺蟻慰蟽蠁苇蟻蔚喂 蟽蟿畏谓 螝蠉蟺蟻慰, 蟿畏谓 螘位位维未伪, 蟿畏谓 螒蟻渭蔚谓委伪, 蟿慰 螜蟽蟻伪萎位, 蔚委谓伪喂 伪蟺蔚喂位苇蟼 魏伪喂 伪谓伪蟽蠁维位蔚喂伪 伪位位维 蔚蟺喂尾维位位蔚蟿伪喂 谓伪 胃苇蟽慰蠀渭蔚 魏蠀蟻蠋蟽蔚喂蟼 魏伪喂 尾苇蟿慰 蟺蠋位畏蟽畏蟼 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏慰蠉 蟽蟿蟻伪蟿喂蠅蟿喂魏慰蠉 慰蟺位喂蟽渭慰蠉, 蔚谓蠈蟽蠅 蟽蠀谓蔚蠂委味蔚蟿伪喂 蟽蟿畏谓 螝蠉蟺蟻慰 畏 魏伪蟿慰蠂萎, 蔚谓蠈蟽蠅 蟽蠀谓蔚蠂委味蔚喂 谓伪 伪蟺蔚喂位蔚委 蟿畏谓 螘位位维未伪 渭蔚 蟺蠈位蔚渭慰.

听听Wouter Beke (PPE). 鈥� Voorzitter, who will defend Europe? Dat is niet alleen de titel van een boek. Dat is ook de cruciale vraag die hier vandaag voorligt. Who will defend Europe? En toen de commissaris aangetreden is, heeft hij gezegd: we hebben een big bang nodig. 800听miljard ligt er op tafel, mijnheer de commissaris. Maar gisteren had u het op Bloomberg TV zelfs over de noodzaak van duizend vijfhonderd miljard om ons te beschermen. Nu, geld is 茅茅n zaak. De manier waarop we het moeten inzetten is een andere zaak.

Laat ons van deze crisis gebruikmaken, deze kans benutten, om het geld effici毛nt in te zetten, om het Europees in te zetten. Better together European. Dat moet het adagium zijn, anders is het een missed opportunity. We moeten het samen kunnen doen. De laatste Eurobarometer is duidelijk: de grootste zorg van de Europeanen is hun bescherming, is hun veiligheid. U heeft dus een stevig mandaat, niet alleen geld, maar u heeft een stevig mandaat om samen te werken aan die Europese defensie. Doe het nu. U heeft onze steun.

听听Carla Tavares (S&D). 鈥� Senhor Presidente, Senhor Comiss谩rio, com a realidade que vivemos hoje, 茅 ineg谩vel e inadi谩vel promover mais investimentos na nossa seguran莽a e defesa comuns.

Temos de garantir que a Uni茫o est谩 preparada para enfrentar todo o tipo de amea莽as, desde as h铆bridas 脿s convencionais, estabelecendo uma forte dissuas茫o, reduzindo as nossas depend锚ncias e refor莽ando a nossa autonomia.

Mas qualquer ideia de tentar escolher entre investimentos em seguran莽a e defesa, ou em coes茫o social, ou em coes茫o, resultaria numa derrota certa em ambas as frentes. Qualquer estrat茅gia de investimento tem de ser abrangente, ter谩 de abordar tanto as nossas vulnerabilidades em capacidades militares como as do nosso tecido social.

Estas s茫o decis玫es estrat茅gicas para a Uni茫o e para o seu futuro. Isso significa que o Parlamento Europeu n茫o deve ser exclu铆do dos processos de decis茫o no que diz respeito aos programas de despesa subjacentes 脿s op莽玫es tomadas para a Uni茫o Europeia.

A recente proposta do ReArm inclui novos empr茅stimos conjuntos com base no artigo 122.潞 do Tratado sobre o Funcionamento da Uni茫o Europeia 鈥� e n茫o podemos deixar de lamentar o recurso, novamente, a este artigo, que exclui o Parlamento da decis茫o.听O Parlamento Europeu 茅 a 煤nica institui莽茫o com poderes legislativos, or莽amentais e de supervis茫o, com legitimidade democr谩tica conferida pela elei莽茫o direta dos seus membros.

Estamos c谩 para decidir em prol dos cidad茫os europeus.

听听Fernand Kartheiser (ECR). 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, Monsieur le Commissaire, en听2012, l鈥橴nion europ茅enne avait re莽u le prix Nobel de la paix. Montrons-nous donc 脿 la hauteur de cette distinction. Au lieu de r茅armer, apprenons d鈥檃bord 脿 nous reparler.

Notre premi猫re ligne de d茅fense doit 锚tre une bonne diplomatie. Or, 脿 cet 茅gard, l鈥橴nion pourrait faire beaucoup mieux. Nos relations sont tendues avec Washington, difficiles avec P茅kin et inexistantes avec Moscou. Ce n鈥檈st pas toujours la faute des autres. Nous devons r茅apprendre 脿 pratiquer la diplomatie, 脿 communiquer, 脿 茅couter et 脿 comprendre, m锚me dans des circonstances apparemment adverses.

Notre deuxi猫me ligne de d茅fense est la dissuasion. Nous voulons am茅liorer nos arm茅es, mais essayons d鈥櫭﹙iter une course 脿 l鈥檃rmement. Faisons plut么t rena卯tre les mesures de confiance et veillons 脿 ne pas d茅penser de sommes d茅mesur茅es et 脿 ne pas contracter des dettes faramineuses pour couvrir des d茅penses militaires. Nos soci茅t茅s connaissent encore bien d鈥檃utres besoins, souvent plus pressants. Le r茅armement est une activit茅 dangereuse 脿 maints 茅gards, vers l鈥檈xt茅rieur comme vers l鈥檌nt茅rieur: gardons-le sous contr么le.

听听H茅lder Sousa Silva (PPE). 鈥� Senhor Presidente, Senhor Comiss谩rio, a seguran莽a da Europa finalmente deixou de ser uma quest茫o secund谩ria.

O Livro Branco sobre o futuro da defesa europeia 茅 um bom 鈥� 茅 um excelente 鈥� alicerce, sobre o qual construiremos uma verdadeira Uni茫o Europeia da Defesa.听As nossas prioridades s茫o claras: uma abordagem abrangente 脿 seguran莽a europeia, aumentar significativamente o investimento em defesa e desenvolver uma ind煤stria de defesa cred铆vel, aut贸noma e soberana.

A Comiss茫o apresentou o plano ReArm Europe para mobilizar, inicialmente, 800 mil milh玫es de euros. Apoiamos estas medidas, mas exigimos compromissos vinculativos e imediatos com responsabilidades atribu铆das a todos os Estados鈥慚embros.

A diplomacia sem capacidade de dissuas茫o 茅 um pleno exerc铆cio de fraqueza. 脡 tempo de honrar a responsabilidade hist贸rica que nos foi confiada, e a Hist贸ria ser谩 escrita em fun莽茫o da nossa a莽茫o ou da nossa ina莽茫o.

(O orador aceita responder a uma pergunta 芦cart茫o azul禄)

听听Jo茫o Oliveira (The Left), Pergunta segundo o procedimento 芦cart茫o azul禄. 鈥� Senhor Deputado H茅lder Sousa Silva, o senhor deputado considera mesmo que 茅 com a corrida aos armamentos que se garante a paz e a seguran莽a coletiva?

A Uni茫o Europeia j谩 despende hoje tr锚s vezes e meia mais em gastos militares do que a R煤ssia e 1,3 vezes mais do que a China. Qual 茅 o sinal que se d谩 ao resto do mundo com esta corrida aos armamentos?

Como 茅 que desviar verbas dos fundos da coes茫o para os gastos militares pode corresponder 脿s necessidades e expectativas dos povos? O senhor deputado n茫o acha que se p玫e em risco n茫o apenas aquilo que era priorit谩rio para a vida dos povos, como, ainda por cima, se acentua a amea莽a e o risco de a confronta莽茫o e a guerra se tornarem mais globais?

听听H茅lder Sousa Silva (PPE), Resposta segundo o procedimento 芦cart茫o azul禄. 鈥� (in铆cio da interven莽茫o com o microfone desligado)听...听tende a n茫o ver a verdadeira dimens茫o do problema. A esquerda em Portugal v锚 que a China se est谩 a armar, v锚 que a R煤ssia j谩 se armou, mas quer que a Europa continue a enterrar a cabe莽a na areia.

Aquilo que n贸s dizemos 茅 芦n茫o禄, n贸s queremos ter capacidade m铆nima de dissuas茫o para defender o povo europeu dos 27 Estados鈥慚embros.

N贸s n茫o queremos fazer um armamento at茅 aos dentes, como se diz em bom portugu锚s, n贸s queremos ter uma capacidade de dissuas茫o m铆nima para n茫o sermos invadidos, como foi a Ucr芒nia, injustamente, por Putin.

听听Eero Hein盲luoma (S&D). 鈥� Arvoisa puhemies, nyt jos koskaan on t盲rke盲盲, ett盲 eurooppalaiset kokoontuvat yhteen ja puolustavat omia arvojaan. Ven盲j盲n raakalaismainen hy枚kk盲ys Ukrainaan pakottaa meid盲t satsaamaan turvallisuuteen. Vastaus Yhdysvaltain uuden hallinnon linjauksiin taas edellytt盲盲 sekin Euroopan omien suorituskykyjen vahvistamista.

Komission puolustuksen valkoinen kirja on vasta alku tarpeellisille johtop盲盲t枚ksille. Puolustusalan yhteisty枚ss盲 on ment盲v盲 paljon pidemm盲lle kuin mit盲 komissio nyt esitt盲盲.

Kun laitamme lis盲盲 rahaa puolustukseen, meid盲n on varmistettava, ett盲 n盲m盲 rahat tuovat turvaa my枚s taloudellisesti. Eurooppalainen puolustusteollisuus tarvitsee pitk盲lle tulevaisuuteen vakaita hankintaohjelmia. EU-rahalla tulee luoda osaamista ja ty枚paikkoja Eurooppaan 鈥� ei valtamerten ylitse. Buy European.

听听Antonio L贸pez-Ist煤riz White (PPE). 鈥� Se帽or presidente, se帽or comisario, algunos 鈥攃omo usted y como yo鈥� llevamos a帽os pidiendo m谩s gastos en defensa en esta Uni贸n Europea. Ahora ya se nos han unido todos, menos mal, ya era hora. Vamos a ver si esto por fin hace que Europa pueda defender tambi茅n su sistema de bienestar.

Muchas gracias por el Libro Blanco y por los millones que van a acompa帽ar a todo este asunto. El tiempo, como digo, nos dir谩 si estamos a tiempo de defendernos sin renunciar a este estado de bienestar.

Las dudas que ahora son explotadas por los populistas y por la extrema izquierda se pod铆an haber resuelto si se hubiese actuado antes. Pero la presidenta de la Comisi贸n y el anterior alto representante han callado y han colaborado para cubrir la falta de cumplimiento de nuestros deberes en materia de defensa en el pasado en pa铆ses como el m铆o, Espa帽a.

Ya no se trata de gastar dinero para mantener una buena relaci贸n con Maduro, ya no se trata de pagar m谩s a las polic铆as auton贸micas que al Ej茅rcito espa帽ol; se trata, sin duda, ahora, de gastar en defender nuestro sistema de bienestar. A ver c贸mo se lo explican a sus socios comunistas e independentistas. Ah铆 les quiero ver.

听听Thijs Reuten (S&D). 鈥� Mr President, Commission, Council, dear colleagues, Europe is already under attack. And you, Commissioner, understand the need for bold ambition and courageous action, which the 合法博彩网站 shares with you.

Member States say they do as well, but I'm not sure, at least not about all of them 鈥� your Member State excluded. They have had their chance to get European defence right, but they squandered precious time and opportunity for the last 15 years. Despite programmes, funds, platforms to promote true European cooperation, Member States have proven unable to rise above narrow national interests. And this costs us military ability, precious money and desirable jobs.

European security is a collective public good for all citizens. It should go hand in hand with resilient societies, with sound education, care and social fabric. No contradiction there. We need a truly European approach to defence that includes European financing, European planning, development, procurement and operational command. Let's get to work.

听听沤eljana Zovko (PPE). 鈥� Mr President, dear Commissioner Kubilius, as you are presenting the white paper on the future of European defence, you will set the tone for strengthening our defence capabilities and industrial competitiveness.

Some important elements must be addressed in this strategic document. As the foundation for our approach to European defence, we must take into account the security challenges of all Member States. When building the future of our defence, it is crucial that we are more open and comprehensive, including by considering the threats that our borders are facing, big and small, and from the east and the south, as we have heard here. The borders and the states of the eastern and south-eastern flank must engage in defence cooperation with our partners in enlargement countries that are participating in our CSDP missions that fully align with our Common Foreign and Security policy. By involving enlargement countries industry in defence procurement, we will fortify the security of European borders.

Finally, all the stakeholders should be engaged in building听European defence. Only by having a state in our common defence vision, all Member States and citizens will embrace this paper as their textbook for future defence of our citizens. Once again, I warmly welcome the announcement that the US is engaging again to help Ukraine at this moment while we are building our European defence, and the good news from Riyadh is an encouraging step in our transatlantic relations.

听听Evin Incir (S&D). 鈥� Mr President, Commissioner, it is crucial that we cultivate strength. Recent global events, from the aggression of the dictator Putin to Trump's approach in the US, remind us of the urgent need for unity within the EU.

It is astonishing to find ourselves discussing the impact of both Putin and a US President in the same breath, but a fact is a fact. For the sake of future generations, we must invest in our industries, in our defence, in infrastructure and cybersecurity capacity, ensuring our societies are robust and resilient.

Moreover, we must broaden our alliance beyond the traditional transatlantic relations. While the partnership with the US is still important, Europe should also strengthen ties with states like the UK, Canada, Brazil, Mexico, India, Japan and countries across Africa. The future of global security, of course, depends on our strength, but it also depends on our cooperation with states with shared values and interests.

听听President. 鈥� I will not take blue cards for the moment because we are running very much behind.

听听Mika Aaltola (PPE). 鈥� Arvoisa puhemies, komission j盲sen Kubilius, maailmalla yleistyy transaktionalistinen suurvaltatoiminta, pakottavan voiman diplomatia. Tehdyt linjaukset Euroopan varustautumisesta Ven盲j盲n varalle ovat sangen j盲rkevi盲.

On aika aikuistua. P盲盲t枚kset olisi ollut hyv盲 tehd盲 jo kolme vuotta sitten, mutta satsaamalla puolustukseen nyt voimme kolmen vuoden p盲盲st盲 ehk盲 huokaista helpotuksesta. Ukrainan vahvuus ja tuen jatkuminen on n盲ht盲v盲 Euroopan puolustuksen samanaikaisena synnytt盲misen盲.

Liiallinen Amerikka-riippuvuuden karsiminen vaatii eurooppalaisten vaihtoehtojen kehitt盲mist盲. Tilanne, jossa noin 70 prosenttia kaikesta hankinnasta tehd盲盲n Yhdysvalloista, ei ole kest盲v盲 malli. Paljon kest盲v盲mp盲盲 on Euroopan teollisen kapasiteetin valjastaminen painavan pelotteen synnytt盲miseen.

听听Vasile D卯ncu (S&D). 鈥� Domnule pre葯edinte, domnule comisar Kubilius, am auzit azi c膬 timpul iluziilor a trecut, deci trebuie s膬 spunem c膬 葯i timpul strategiilor de h芒rtie a trecut. Avem nevoie 卯n acest moment de o foaie de parcurs pentru o armat膬 european膬. Avem nevoie de un plan de ac葲iune pentru a consolida autonomia strategic膬 a Uniunii Europene 葯i pentru a diminua dependen葲a de NATO din acest moment. Avem nevoie de trei piloni pentru asta. Despre primii doi s-a vorbit mult: crearea 卯n primul r芒nd a unei capacit膬葲i militare proprii, apoi o industrie de ap膬rare integrat膬 葯i mai ales, a葯 spune, o strategie proprie de descurajare. Voi insista asupra acestui al treilea element.

Avem nevoie de un mecanism european de descurajare militar膬 葯i economic膬, capabil s膬 contracareze amenin葲膬rile externe f膬r膬 a depinde de NATO, 葯i aici ar fi c芒teva lucruri. 脦n primul r芒nd, ar fi nevoie de o construc葲ie a unei doctrine proprii, a unui scenariu de r膬spuns militar 卯n cazul unui atac, 葯i de opera葲ionalizare a articolului 42 din Tratatul privind Uniunea European膬, similar articolului 5 din NATO. Ne trebuie un scut european de ap膬rare pentru atacuri cibernetice, de exemplu, dar poate 葯i un scut antirachet膬 葯i, de asemenea, o definire clar膬 a momentelor 葯i a circumstan葲elor 卯n care Uniunea European膬 intervine militar, at芒t 卯n intern, c芒t 葯i 卯n extern. Sunt investi葲ii de inteligen葲膬 absolut necesare. De asemenea, ne-ar trebui 葯i o structur膬 de guvernan葲膬 卯n ap膬rare, pentru c膬 acum este fragmentat膬.

听听Matej Tonin (PPE). 鈥� Mr President, Commissioner, esteemed colleagues, now more than ever, we need a true European Defence Union. Today we face a key moment for our defence under the REARM Europe plan. While I strongly advocate for this initiative, we must recognise that we are at least three years late in addressing our defence needs.

Europe must reclaim its own security. We are at the beginning of an important journey to develop a European army. Together we can turn our vision into reality, but this will require strong commitment from all of us.

This is not just about buying equipment. It's about coming together. We must address challenges with a united military force. We need to significantly expand our military capabilities. Yes, challenges will come, just as they did with introducing a common currency 鈥� the euro. But today, the euro is a pillar of European stability. Tomorrow we have to add a European army.

PRESIDENZA: ANTONELLA SBERNA
Vicepresidente

听听Kl谩ra Dobrev (S&D). 鈥� Eln枚k Asszony! A mai napon egyszer疟en csak szerettem volna 枚r眉lni annak, hogy a m煤lt h茅ten megsz眉letett a meg谩llapod谩s az er艖s eur贸pai v茅delemr艖l, de sajnos nek眉nk, magyaroknak a m煤lt h茅ten a vil谩g vesz茅lyesebb helly茅 v谩lt, mint volt el艖tte. Mert mik枚zben Eur贸pa 枚sszefogott, mert meg茅rtette, hogy az 谩llampolg谩rait csak itt tudja nagyobb biztons谩gban, ak枚zben Orb谩n Viktor egy 煤jabb l茅p茅st tett afel茅, hogy orsz谩gunkat kivezesse az Eur贸pai Uni贸b贸l.

M谩r nem el茅g, hogy bel眉lr艖l bomlasztja, Putyin utas铆t谩sai alapj谩n elutas铆t mindent, ami Ukrajna t谩mogat谩s谩r贸l sz贸l, de a m煤lt h茅ten egy olyan t枚rv茅nyjavaslatot kezdem茅nyeztek, amely lehet艖v茅 fogja tenni, hogy magyar 谩llampolg谩rokat, a korm谩nynak nem tetsz艖 civileket 茅s politikusokat sz谩m疟zzenek az orsz谩gb贸l. Ez orsz谩gom Eur贸pa Tan谩csb贸l t枚rt茅n艖 kil茅p茅s茅t jelenten茅 azonnal, amely egy hatalmas l茅p茅s az Eur贸pai Uni贸 elhagy谩sa fel茅. De nem fogjuk hagyni, Eur贸pa er艖sebb, 茅s 铆gy Magyarorsz谩g is er艖sebb lesz Orb谩n n茅lk眉l.

听听螞慰蠀魏维蟼 桅慰蠀蟻位维蟼 (PPE). 鈥� 螝蠀蟻委伪 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 蠁委位蔚 魏蠉蟻喂蔚 螘蟺委蟿蟻慰蟺蔚, 畏 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏 未蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 蟺位苇慰谓 谓伪 尾伪蟽委味蔚蟿伪喂 蟽蔚 蟿蟻委蟿慰蠀蟼 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 伪蟽蠁维位蔚喂伪 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 维渭蠀谓维 蟿畏蟼. 螚 蔚蟺喂魏蔚委渭蔚谓畏 螞蔚蠀魏萎 螔委尾位慰蟼 纬喂伪 蟿慰 渭苇位位慰谓 蟿畏蟼 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎蟼 维渭蠀谓伪蟼 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 伪谓慰委尉蔚喂 蟿慰谓 未蟻蠈渭慰 纬喂伪 蟿畏 未畏渭喂慰蠀蟻纬委伪 渭喂伪蟼 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎蟼 未蠉谓伪渭畏蟼 蟺慰蠀 谓伪 蔚委谓伪喂 蟽蔚 胃苇蟽畏 谓伪 蠀蟺蔚蟻伪蟽蟺喂蟽蟿蔚委 蟿伪 蟽蠉谓慰蟻伪 魏伪喂 蟿伪 蟽蠀渭蠁苇蟻慰谓蟿维 蟿畏蟼. 螒蠀蟿蠈 蠀蟺慰蟽蟿畏蟻委味蠅 伪蟺蠈 蟿畏谓 蟺蟻蠋蟿畏 渭苇蟻伪 蟿畏蟼 蔚魏位慰纬萎蟼 渭慰蠀. 螖蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 蠈渭蠅蟼 谓伪 尉蔚魏喂谓维渭蔚 位维胃慰蟼. 螝伪喂 胃苇位蠅 谓伪 蔚委渭伪喂 蟽伪蠁萎蟼. 螖蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 蟽蔚 伪蠀蟿萎 蟿畏谓 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺维胃蔚喂伪 蟿慰蠀 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏慰蠉 螒渭蠀谓蟿喂魏慰蠉 螠畏蠂伪谓喂蟽渭慰蠉 谓伪 蟽蠀渭渭蔚蟿苇蠂蔚喂 畏 韦慰蠀蟻魏委伪, 渭喂伪 蠂蠋蟻伪 蟺慰蠀 魏伪蟿苇蠂蔚喂 蟺伪蟻维谓慰渭伪 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏蠈 苇未伪蠁慰蟼. 螠喂伪 蠂蠋蟻伪 蟺慰蠀 蔚委谓伪喂 蟺蔚喂蟻伪蟿萎蟼 蟽蟿畏 螠蔚蟽蠈纬蔚喂慰 魏伪喂 伪蟺蔚喂位蔚委 蟽蠀谓蔚蠂蠋蟼 维位位伪 纬蔚喂蟿慰谓喂魏维 蟿畏蟼 魏蟻维蟿畏. 螠喂伪 蠂蠋蟻伪 蟺慰蠀 未蔚谓 蔚谓伪蟻渭慰谓委蟽蟿畏魏蔚 渭蔚 蟿喂蟼 魏蠀蟻蠋蟽蔚喂蟼 魏伪蟿维 蟿畏蟼 巍蠅蟽委伪蟼, 伪谓蟿委胃蔚蟿伪 蔚谓喂蟽蠂蠉胃畏魏蔚 慰喂魏慰谓慰渭喂魏维 魏伪喂 慰蠀未苇蟺慰蟿蔚 伪谓伪纬谓蠋蟻喂蟽蔚 蟿畏 围伪渭维蟼 蠅蟼 蟿蟻慰渭慰魏蟻伪蟿喂魏萎 慰蟻纬维谓蠅蟽畏. 危伪蟼 魏伪位蠋 谓伪 伪谓伪位慰纬喂蟽蟿蔚委蟿蔚 蟿喂蟼 慰位苇胃蟻喂蔚蟼 蟽蠀谓苇蟺蔚喂蔚蟼 伪蟺蠈 渭喂伪 蟿苇蟿慰喂伪 蔚尉苇位喂尉畏. 螘蟺喂尾维位位蔚蟿伪喂 谓伪 纬委谓慰蠀谓 尾萎渭伪蟿伪 蟺蟻慰蟼 蟿畏谓 伪渭蠀谓蟿喂魏萎 伪蠀蟿慰谓慰渭委伪. 螒蠀蟿蠈 蟿慰 蟽蟿畏蟻委味蠅 蟽胃蔚谓伪蟻维. 螌蠂喂 蠈渭蠅蟼 谓伪 纬委谓慰蠀谓 尾萎渭伪蟿伪 蟺蟻慰蟼 蟿畏 位维胃慰蟼 魏伪蟿蔚蠉胃蠀谓蟽畏. 螘蠀蠂伪蟻喂蟽蟿蠋 蟺慰位蠉.

听听螘渭渭伪谓慰蠀萎位 螝蔚蠁伪位慰纬喂维谓谓畏蟼 (PPE). 鈥� 螝蠀蟻委伪 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 魏蠀蟻委蔚蟼 魏伪喂 魏蠉蟻喂慰喂: 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 维渭蠀谓伪. 螙慰蠉渭蔚 蟿畏 渭蔚纬伪位蠉蟿蔚蟻畏 魏蟻委蟽畏 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰谓 未蔚蠉蟿蔚蟻慰 螤伪纬魏蠈蟽渭喂慰 螤蠈位蔚渭慰. 螒蟼 魏维谓慰蠀渭蔚 蟿畏谓 魏蟻委蟽畏 伪蠀蟿萎 蔚蠀魏伪喂蟻委伪. 螒蟼 蟺喂维蟽慰蠀渭蔚 尉伪谓维 蟿慰 谓萎渭伪 蔚魏蔚委 蟺慰蠀 蟿慰 伪蠁萎蟽伪渭蔚 蟺蟻喂谓 70 蠂蟻蠈谓喂伪. 韦蠈蟿蔚 蟺慰蠀 慰蟻伪渭伪蟿喂味蠈渭伪蟽蟿蔚 谓伪 未畏渭喂慰蠀蟻纬萎蟽慰蠀渭蔚 蟿畏谓 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 螒渭蠀谓蟿喂魏萎 螆谓蠅蟽畏 鈥擡uropean Defence Community鈥�, 蟿畏谓 慰蟺慰委伪 魏伪蟿伪蠄萎蠁喂蟽蔚 畏 纬伪位位喂魏萎 螘胃谓慰蟽蠀谓苇位蔚蠀蟽畏 蟿慰 1950, 纬喂伪 谓伪 未畏渭喂慰蠀蟻纬萎蟽慰蠀渭蔚 蟿畏 螖蠀蟿喂魏慰蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 螆谓蠅蟽畏, 苇谓伪谓 慰蟻纬伪谓喂蟽渭蠈 蟺慰蠀 纬喂伪 50 蠂蟻蠈谓喂伪 蔚位维蠂喂蟽蟿伪 蟺蟻慰蟽苇蠁蔚蟻蔚 蟽蟿畏谓 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 维渭蠀谓伪 魏伪喂 伪蟽蠁维位蔚喂伪.

螝蠀蟻委蔚蟼 魏伪喂 魏蠉蟻喂慰喂, 伪蟼 蔚谓喂蟽蠂蠉蟽慰蠀渭蔚 蟿畏谓 维渭蠀谓伪 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 伪蟽蠁维位蔚喂伪, 魏伪喂 蟽蔚 蔚胃谓喂魏蠈 蔚蟺委蟺蔚未慰 魏伪喂 渭蔚 蟿伪 150 未喂蟽蔚魏伪蟿慰渭渭蠉蟻喂伪 蟿慰蠀 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏慰蠉 蟺蟻慰蠇蟺慰位慰纬喂蟽渭慰蠉. 螖蠉谓伪渭萎 渭伪蟼 畏 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏 蟿蠅谓 伪蟻蠂蠋谓 魏伪喂 蟿蠅谓 伪尉喂蠋谓, 畏 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏 蟿畏蟼 蔚喂蟻萎谓畏蟼, 畏 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏 蟿慰蠀 未喂蔚胃谓慰蠉蟼 未喂魏伪委慰蠀, 畏 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏 蟿畏蟼 蔚喂蟻畏谓喂魏萎蟼 蔚蟺委位蠀蟽畏蟼 蟿蠅谓 未喂伪蠁慰蟻蠋谓. 螖蠉谓伪渭萎 渭伪蟼 畏 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏 蟿慰蠀 蟽蔚尾伪蟽渭慰蠉 蟿慰蠀 螝伪蟿伪蟽蟿伪蟿喂魏慰蠉 围维蟻蟿畏 蟿慰蠀 螣蟻纬伪谓喂蟽渭慰蠉 蟿蠅谓 螚谓蠅渭苇谓蠅谓 螘胃谓蠋谓. 危伪蟼 蔚蠀蠂伪蟻喂蟽蟿蠋 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 蟺蟻慰蟽慰蠂萎 蟽伪蟼.

听听Se谩n Kelly (PPE). 鈥� A Uachtar谩in, a Choimisin茅ir Kubilius, Russia's invasion of Ukraine has upended European security, bringing conventional warfare back to our doorstep.听Hybrid threats like cyber-attacks and disinformation now target our institutions.

For too long, Ireland has overlooked security and defence. While we remain committed to military neutrality, it does not equate to vulnerability. Securing our territorial waters and airspace is crucial, and the Government is prioritising the much-needed investment in our defence forces.

That is why I support Ireland's increased ambition in terms of urgent investment in primary radar, naval expansion and air defence. These are not luxuries: they are fundamental to our national security.

At the same time, Ireland's commitment to neutrality remains steadfast. But neutrality must be fit for purpose for the 21st century. That means contributing meaningfully to European security and contributing in areas in which we have a considerable degree of experience and expertise 鈥� like peacekeeping, for example.

It's time to get off the fence and get on with defence.

听听Ana Miguel Pedro (PPE). 鈥� Senhora Presidente, Senhor Ministro, Senhor Comiss谩rio, a pol铆tica de defesa deve ser guiada pelo realismo, n茫o por ilus玫es.

A Uni茫o Europeia reconheceu o 贸bvio: a Europa n茫o est谩 pronta para se defender. A paz depende da for莽a, e a Europa n茫o tem a suficiente.听Durante d茅cadas, acredit谩mos num mundo sem guerra, numa ordem baseada em regras e num continente seguro, sem investimento em defesa.

A NATO continua a ser o pilar da nossa seguran莽a, imaginar uma defesa europeia isolada da Alian莽a 茅 uma fantasia perigosa.

N茫o precisamos de um ex茅rcito europeu, mas de 27 for莽as armadas eficazes, interoper谩veis, com padr玫es comuns e capacidade de resposta coordenada. Isso significa mais harmoniza莽茫o, defesa a茅rea avan莽ada e uma ind煤stria de defesa robusta; assegurar o dom铆nio estrat茅gico no espa莽o e no ciberespa莽o, tudo isto s茫o escolhas que definir茫o o futuro da Europa.

Os desafios que enfrentamos n茫o s茫o te贸ricos, s茫o reais, e a Hist贸ria n茫o espera por quem hesita. Precisamos de uma pol铆tica de defesa 脿 altura do nosso tempo.

听听Christophe Gomart (PPE). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Monsieur le Commissaire, chers coll猫gues, le g茅n茅ral fran莽ais que je suis conna卯t bien le monde de la d茅fense et l鈥檌ndustrie de la d茅fense. Les trait茅s fondateurs de l鈥橢urope, ceux qui prot猫gent notre unit茅, nous rappellent que la d茅fense n鈥檈st pas une comp茅tence de l鈥橴nion europ茅enne. Nous n鈥檃vons pas besoin d鈥檜ne听arm茅e europ茅enne; nous avons besoin d鈥檃rmes con莽ues, produites et vendues par les Europ茅ens et aux Europ茅ens. Cela donnera de la coh茅rence 脿 nos arm茅es nationales.

N鈥檃yons pas peur de faire face aux d茅fis auxquels nous sommes confront茅s: une Russie tr猫s hostile; des 脡tats-Unis qui prennent leurs distances et nous divisent; une Turquie liberticide qui occupe un tiers de Chypre et soutient les djihadistes en Syrie et l鈥橝zerba茂djan contre les chr茅tiens d鈥橝rm茅nie; un islamisme radical qui nous menace 脿 l鈥檈xt茅rieur comme 脿 l鈥檌nt茅rieur; enfin, une Chine de plus en plus puissante, dont nous sommes le plus d茅pendants 茅conomiquement, car elle repr茅sente 21听% de nos importations.

Soyons concrets: chaque pays doit accomplir cet effort de coh茅rence en achetant europ茅en. En effet, des achats d鈥檃rmes 茅trang猫res peuvent nous emp锚cher de mener les actions militaires que nous aurions d茅cid茅es. Surtout, six 脡tats membres disposent de 120 脿 4听000听entreprises de d茅fense en mesure de r茅pondre 脿 nos besoins. Ces six pays doivent pouvoir vendre davantage en Europe et 茅laborer des politiques industrielles communes. C鈥檈st 脿 ce seul prix que nous deviendrons ind茅pendants et autonomes.

Procedura "catch-the-eye"

听听Radan Kanev (PPE). 鈥� Madam President, dear colleagues, I followed the whole debate and I heard really many reasonable voices from almost all the groups in this 合法博彩网站. It seems that we are united around the evident truth that European security is our natural, first and common priority.

To that, I would say common defence makes common sense, that security requires more than a Commission proposal and a Council consent, but a strong common effort to build a strong European industry, from steel to chemicals, from raw materials to weapons, and from food to space technology.

Above all else, it requires real unity, a grand political coalition of pro-Europeans crossing national and ideological lines, leaving the cultural wars behind and building consensus around universally accepted European values and interests.

听听Juan Fernando L贸pez Aguilar (S&D). 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, se帽or comisario, de este debate sobre la defensa europea emergen tres lecciones claras. La primera es que reforzar la defensa europea no puede depender de incrementar veintisiete presupuestos nacionales fragmentados entre s铆, porque sin interoperabilidad ni estructuras comunes no tendremos ninguna capacidad disuasoria frente a Rusia, pese a que nuestro ej茅rcito y nuestros presupuestos conjuntos sean superiores a los suyos; no, desde luego, sin el paraguas de la OTAN y con una Casa Blanca desvinculada del compromiso de la seguridad colectiva del art铆culo 5 del Tratado del Atl谩ntico Norte.

En segundo lugar, para reinterpretar correctamente la cl谩usula de seguridad colectiva del Tratado de la Uni贸n Europea (art铆culo 42, apartado 7) lo que tenemos que hacer es especializar por valores a帽adidos la conjunci贸n de capacidades militares, innovaci贸n y ciberseguridad. Y la tercera lecci贸n es que eso no puede hacerse a costa ni del pilar europeo de derechos sociales ni de la cohesi贸n europea, de modo que resulta imprescindible ensayar herramientas e instrumentos de financiaci贸n nuevos, incluida, naturalmente, la deuda com煤n para sustentar el esfuerzo defensivo de Europa.

听听Rasmus Andresen (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin! Ich glaube, dass man nach 眉ber zwei Stunden Debatte feststellen kann, dass hier eine gro脽e Mehrheit gewillt ist, mehr f眉r unsere Sicherheit zu tun und, ja, auch mehr gemeinsam zu investieren. Aber ich finde, unsere Rolle als Europ盲isches Parlament sollte nicht nur sein, abzunicken, was die EU-Kommission vorschl盲gt, mit dem ReArm Europe-Programm, sondern dar眉ber hinauszugehen.

Und ich will ganz deutlich sagen: Wenn wir mehr Kredite auch gemeinsam in die Hand nehmen wollen, dann m眉ssen wir daf眉r sorgen, dass sie effizient eingesetzt werden, dass Transparenz herrscht und dass wir auch mehr gemeinsam europ盲ische Projekte nach vorne stellen.

Ich glaube, dass, wenn wir die Schuldenregeln aussetzen, das nicht ausreicht, sondern dass wir eine richtige Reform der Schuldenregeln auf europ盲ischer Ebene brauchen, um wirklich auch mehr gemeinsam zu investieren. Ich glaube, dass wir das nicht nur tun sollten f眉r Waffen und R眉stungen听鈥� die alleine schaffen keinen Frieden und keine Sicherheit. Wir m眉ssen auch in innere Sicherheit, in Cybersicherheit oder aber auch in Klimainfrastruktur investieren听鈥� nur dann werden wir als Europ盲ische Union gemeinsam wieder souver盲ner.

听听Lynn Boylan (The Left). 鈥� Madam听President, I've been listening to the whole debate, and I've heard a lot of colleagues talk about defending democracy and about the need to join an EU army, but I would like to ask them, what about Ireland's democracy? What about our right to be a neutral country? Because repeatedly, Irish citizens have rejected any form of EU common security and defence or EU army, both at Nice and at Lisbon treaties. They rejected those treaties on that basis, and consistently polling data shows that 75% of the Irish population support our position of neutrality. So I ask colleagues who are calling for NATO, who are calling for EU armies, what about Ireland's respect for our democracy and our democratic wishes to remain a neutral country and to not have our cohesion funds slashed and burned for the arms industry of Europe? So, respect Ireland's democratic wishes.

听听Luis-Vicen葲iu Lazarus (NI). 鈥� Doamn膬 pre葯edint膬, dragi colegi, realitatea crud膬 este c膬 nu avem strategie, nu avem lideri, nu avem diploma葲ie. De ce spun asta? Pentru c膬, 卯n realitate, dac膬 aveam, acest r膬zboi fie nu ar fi avut loc sau, acum, la trei ani distan葲膬, am fi stat cu Trump la mas膬 葯i am fi pus la cale nu numai pacea din Ucraina, ci 葯i pacea de pe 卯ntreaga planet膬. 脦n schimb, Trump nu se uit膬 la noi. Trebuie s膬 卯n葲elegem c膬 America de ast膬zi a lui Trump nu mai e America de ieri a lui Biden. Trump vrea pace 葯i prosperitate, Biden vrea r膬zboi.

Poate nu ar mai trebui nici noi s膬 dorim r膬zboi, poate nu ar trebui s膬 cheltuim 800 de miliarde pe 卯narmare 葯i poate ar trebui s膬 c膬ut膬m solu葲ii. Ce solu葲ii sunt? Dac膬 Pre葯edinta Parlamentului European, doamna Roberta Metsola, a fost la Washington, am 卯n葲eles c膬 a mers la cimitirul Arlington, dar n-a ajuns s膬 se 卯nt芒lneasc膬 cu Vance sau cu Trump. Atunci de ce s-a dus acolo, s膬 viziteze un cimitir? Poate d芒nsele ar trebui s膬-葯i dea demisia, s膬 punem al葲i lideri importan葲i 卯n func葲iile care conteaz膬 葯i s膬 st膬m la mas膬 cu Trump pentru a g膬si solu葲ii de pace, c膬ci altfel o s膬 ne ducem 卯n... (c芒teva cuvinte care nu se aud)

听听Krzysztof Hetman (PPE). 鈥� Pani Przewodnicz膮ca! Panie Komisarzu! Szanowni Pa艅stwo! Europejska unia obronna musi sta膰 si臋 faktem. Europejska unia obronna jako sojusz gospodarczy musi by膰 nowym ko艂em zamachowym dla europejskiej i polskiej gospodarki. Ale 偶eby to si臋 sta艂o, musz膮 by膰 zaanga偶owane wszystkie 艣rodki, zar贸wno europejskie, krajowe, jak i prywatne. Dzisiaj o tych prywatnych bardzo du偶o tu rozmawiali艣my. Ale, Panie Komisarzu, je艣li nie uporz膮dkuje si臋 spraw certyfikacji i akredytacji wszystkich produkt贸w zwi膮zanych z szeroko rozumian膮 obronno艣ci膮, niestety nie b臋dziemy potrafili wykorzysta膰 tego potencja艂u prywatnych przedsi臋biorc贸w w tak wa偶nej sprawie jak kwestia obronno艣ci.

I drugi element to kwestia preferencyjnych kredyt贸w, kt贸re przedsi臋biorcy musz膮 uzyska膰, ale bez tej buchalterii urz臋dniczej i biurokracji, kt贸ra niesie za sob膮 艣rodki europejskie pochodz膮ce z bud偶etu Unii Europejskiej. Je艣li b臋dziemy potrafili zaanga偶owa膰 w to prywatny biznes, prywatnych przedsi臋biorc贸w, pozosta艂e inne 艣rodki, jestem przekonany, 偶e Europejska Unia Obronna b臋dzie dla nas wszystkich naprawd臋 wielkim sukcesem.

听听Davor Ivo Stier (PPE). 鈥� Madam听President, dear colleagues, I think that we need to acknowledge that today the US has a different assessment of Russia and the threat it poses to European security. At the same time, we also need to acknowledge that we are cooperating well with the United States in promoting, for example, peace and stability in the Western Balkans, and that we need to keep that cooperation.

But in both cases, I think that we will be stronger allies and we will be a more secure continent by investing more and investing better in our defence. And that's why the ReArm Europe was necessary. We need to support it. It's probably not enough, but it's a decisive step in building the European defence capabilities. And that's why we also look forward to the white paper to be delivered next week, to see the ways how to spend not only more, but also to spend better and to produce more in the European Union.

We knew that we need to assume more responsibilities for our security. Now, that is not a choice. That is a necessity.

(Fine della procedura "catch the eye")

听听Andrius Kubilius, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, honourable Members, I would like to thank you for this historic debate, as I said at the very beginning. It is very symbolic that we have this debate on this special day, for me, my Lithuanian colleagues here in 合法博彩网站 and all the Lithuanian nation, on Lithuania's independence day.

In 1990, we regained our independence after 50 years of occupation by the Soviet Empire. My message on this day is very clear: we, Lithuanians, don't want to go through the same in the 21st century 鈥� another occupation and another independence day. I don't want my sons and my grandkids to face it and I don't want your 鈥� in the left, in the centre and the right 鈥� kids and grandkids to face the fate of Ukrainian children. That is why I wish Lithuanians a Happy Independence Day from the 1990s.

And to all my friends in Europe, I want to say: independence is easy to lose, but very hard to regain. We must now be ready to defend our European independence. I would like to remind you that Russia, this year, in so-called purchasing power parity terms, will spend for the war more than all of us in the European Union are going to spend.

I would also like to remind you of the numbers which NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte is always repeating. Now, at this moment, Russia during three months produces more weapons than all NATO Member States, including the United States, Canada, Great Britain, Norway and us in the European Union are producing during one year. We must really understand what this means. That is why I want to thank all of you for all of your support during this discussion, for Ukraine and for the defence of Europe.

Next week, we will present the white paper on the future of European defence, with a focus on investment capabilities and defence industry. We will continue our discussion and we will put words into action to deter aggression and prevent war.

听听Adam Sz艂apka, President-in-Office of the Council. 鈥� Madam听President, honourable Members, Commissioner Kubilius, congratulations with Lithuania's national independence day, of course. Thank you very much for this debate. I think we all agree that security and defence are top political priorities. I also see a lot of common ground when it comes to the question of defence financing and reinforcing our defence industry.

The special European Council last week gave a strong impetus to our work on European defence. The EU leaders had the first concrete discussion based on options tabled by the Commission. The President of the Commission presented them this morning. The EU leaders will continue their discussion on the European Council meetings next week and in June. As presidency of the Council, we stand ready to proactively take forward all initiatives that will reinforce European defence. I look forward to our continued exchange on this key topic and, of course, the forthcoming white paper on the future of European defence.

听听Presidente. 鈥� Comunico di aver ricevuto otto proposte di risoluzione a conclusione della discussione.

Dichiaro chiusa la discussione.

La votazione si svolger脿 domani.

Dichiarazioni scritte (articolo 178)

听听螕蔚蠋蟻纬喂慰蟼 螒蠀蟿喂维蟼 (PPE), 纬蚁伪蟺蟿蠋蟼. 鈥� 螒尉喂蠈蟿喂渭慰 螤蟻慰蔚未蟻蔚委慰, 螝. 螘蟺委蟿蟻慰蟺蔚, 螒纬伪蟺畏蟿慰委 蟽蠀谓维未蔚位蠁慰喂 螚 蔚谓蔚蟻纬慰蟺慰委畏蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 蟻萎蟿蟻伪蟼 未喂伪蠁蠀纬萎蟼 胃伪 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 未喂伪蟽蠁伪位委味蔚喂 蟿畏谓 委蟽畏 渭蔚蟿伪蠂蔚委蟻喂蟽畏 渭蔚蟿伪尉蠉 蟿蠅谓 魏蟻伪蟿蠋谓 渭蔚位蠋谓 蟿畏蟼 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎蟼 螆谓蠅蟽畏蟼. 螤蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 喂蟽蠂蠉蔚喂 畏 委未喂伪 未畏渭慰蟽喂慰谓慰渭喂魏萎 蔚位维蠁蟻蠀谓蟽畏 魏伪喂 蟽蔚 蔚魏蔚委谓伪 蟿伪 魏蟻维蟿畏 蟺慰蠀 萎未畏 魏伪位蠉蟺蟿慰蠀谓 蟿慰 蟽蟿蠈蠂慰 蟿蠅谓 伪渭蠀谓蟿喂魏蠋谓 未伪蟺伪谓蠋谓 蟿慰蠀 螡螒韦螣, 蠈蟺蠅蟼 畏 螘位位维未伪 蟺慰蠀 未伪蟺伪谓维 蟺慰位位维 未喂蟽蔚魏伪蟿慰渭渭蠉蟻喂伪 蔚蠀蟻蠋 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 蟺蟻慰蟽蟿伪蟽委伪 蟿蠅谓 蟽蠀谓蠈蟻蠅谓 蟿畏蟼. 螚 螝慰渭喂蟽喂蠈谓 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 魏喂谓畏胃蔚委 蟺蟻慰蟼 伪蠀蟿萎 蟿畏谓 魏伪蟿蔚蠉胃蠀谓蟽畏, 魏伪胃蠋蟼 伪蟻魏蔚蟿苇蟼 蠂蠋蟻蔚蟼 蟿畏蟼 螘螘 蠈蟺蠅蟼 魏伪喂 畏 螘位位维未伪, 苇蠂慰蠀谓 蠀蟺慰蟽蟿蔚委 蟿蔚蟻维蟽蟿喂慰 魏蠈蟽蟿慰蟼 纬喂伪 蟿畏 蠁蠉位伪尉畏 蟿蠅谓 蟽蠀谓蠈蟻蠅谓 蟿慰蠀蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 伪谓伪尾维胃渭喂蟽畏 蟿蠅谓 伪渭蠀谓蟿喂魏蠋谓 蟿畏蟼 未蠀谓伪蟿慰蟿萎蟿蠅谓. 螚 蟽蠉蟽蟿伪蟽畏 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏慰蠉 韦伪渭蔚委慰蠀 螁渭蠀谓伪蟼, 蔚委谓伪喂 胃蔚蟿喂魏萎. 惟蟽蟿蠈蟽慰, 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 蔚纬魏伪委蟻蠅蟼 谓伪 未喂蔚蠀魏蟻喂谓喂蟽胃蔚委 伪蟺蠈 蟿畏谓 螘蟺喂蟿蟻慰蟺萎 蠈蟿喂 蟿伪 150 未喂蟽蔚魏伪蟿慰渭渭蠉蟻喂伪 蔚蠀蟻蠋 蟿慰蠀 谓苇慰蠀 蟿伪渭蔚委慰蠀 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 伪尉喂慰蟺慰喂畏胃慰蠉谓 伪蟺慰魏位蔚喂蟽蟿喂魏维 魏伪喂 渭蠈谓慰 伪蟺蠈 蟿伪 魏蟻维蟿畏 渭苇位畏 蟿畏蟼 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎蟼 螆谓蠅蟽畏蟼.螣蠀未蔚渭委伪 蠂蠋蟻伪 蔚魏蟿蠈蟼 螘螘 未蔚谓 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 未喂魏伪喂慰蠉蟿伪喂 蠂蟻畏渭伪蟿慰未蠈蟿畏蟽畏 伪蟺蠈 蟿畏谓 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 韦蟻维蟺蔚味伪 螘蟺蔚谓未蠉蟽蔚蠅谓.

听听Ioan-Rare艧 Bogdan (PPE), 卯n scris. 鈥� Cet膬葲enii privesc cu 卯ngrijorare planurile de a maximiza securitatea continentului prin investi葲ii militare.

Ei sunt con葯tien葲i c膬 f膬r膬 ajutorul SUA, ap膬rarea Uniunii Europene ar sc膬dea semnificativ. Dar mai sunt con葯tien葲i c膬 siguran葲a depinde de c芒t de mult investe葯ti 卯n ea. Dou膬 aspecte trebuie avute 卯n vedere de Comisie 葯i Consiliul European atunci c芒nd vor stabili regulile concrete ale achizi葲iilor: transparen葲a 葯i obiectivitatea.

脦n privin葲a obiectivit膬葲ii, s膬 nu uit膬m ceva: Vestul n-a trecut prin 50 de ani de comunism, unde nu a existat pia葲膬, competen葲膬, investi葲ii 卯n bun膬starea general膬, transparen葲膬, ci doar lozinci sovietice bine ambalate.

Decalajul este at芒t de mare 卯nc芒t, a trata egal necesarul de investi葲ii 卯n ap膬rare ar fi o nedreptate.

Ar fi o neglijare a aspira葲iilor cet膬葲enilor din Rom芒nia, Bulgaria 葯i restul 葲膬rilor din fostul bloc comunist 卯n a-葯i ob葲ine infrastructuri civilizate 卯n materie de s膬n膬tate, educa葲ie, transport, administra葲ie.

葮i asta deoarece dac膬 aloci bani pentru ap膬rare, trebuie s膬 卯i iei din alt膬 parte!

Foarte mul葲i ani, 卯n timp ce 葲膬rile socialiste erau la frontiera Europei, orientate for葲at, cu glon葲ul la t芒mpl膬, c膬tre ru葯i, Vestul s-a dezvoltat.

Rom芒nii au ap膬rat Europa nu o dat膬 葯i n-au vrut niciodat膬 s膬 o cucereasc膬.

Acum este r芒ndul Europei!

听听Jos茅 Cepeda (S&D), por escrito. 鈥� Vivimos un momento determinante para poner las bases en garantizar la defensa europea y los socialdem贸cratas vamos a impulsar que se tengan en cuenta nuestras propuestas, que se entienda la seguridad como un concepto concreto, y que no se comprometan las pol铆ticas sociales ni los recursos destinados a ellas para el necesario refuerzo de nuestra seguridad.

Los principales temas que abordar谩 el Libro Blanco son: evaluaci贸n actualizada de las amenazas para la UE, apoyo a Ucrania, estrategia para cerrar la brecha en nuestras capacidades de defensa y su financiaci贸n. Abordar谩 la dimensi贸n industrial, transformando la evaluaci贸n de amenazas y el an谩lisis sobre la brecha de capacidades en un conjunto de objetivos industriales para la producci贸n de capacidades y material de defensa.

Los socialdem贸cratas defendemos mantener capacidad para proteger a nuestros ciudadanos, disuadir a nuestros enemigos, apoyar a nuestros aliados y convertirnos en un actor poderoso en la defensa de un orden internacional basado en normas.

Necesitamos un presupuesto s贸lido adem谩s de otros instrumentos financieros europeos adicionales, base industrial fiable y soberana, capacidades de seguridad europeas, incluidos los facilitadores estrat茅gicos, y un mando integrado que permita a todas las fuerzas nacionales actuar bajo una 煤nica estructura. Defendemos adem谩s una contribuci贸n importante relacionada con la PCSD y sus aspectos operativos.

听听Csaba Moln谩r (S&D), 铆谤谩蝉产补苍. 鈥� Tisztelt Eln枚k Asszony!

Tisztelt K茅pvisel艖t谩rsak!

Eur贸pa csak akkor lehet biztons谩gos, ha k茅pes saj谩t mag谩t megv茅deni. Az Eur贸pai Uni贸 d枚nt茅se vil谩gos: er艖s铆ten眉nk kell k枚z枚s v茅delm眉nket, mert ez nemcsak Eur贸pa, hanem Magyarorsz谩g biztons谩g谩t is szolg谩lja.

Mik枚zben Eur贸pa 枚sszefog, Orb谩n Viktor 煤jabb l茅p茅st tett az elszigetel艖d茅s fel茅. Nem el茅g, hogy bel眉lr艖l gyeng铆ti az Uni贸t, blokkolja Ukrajna t谩mogat谩s谩t 茅s Putyin 茅rdekeit k茅pviseli, de politik谩j谩val Magyarorsz谩g eur贸pai j枚v艖j茅t is vesz茅lybe sodorja.

Orb谩n Viktor nem akad谩lyozhatja meg Eur贸pa meger艖s枚d茅s茅t. A k枚z枚s eur贸pai v茅delem az Eur贸pai Egyes眉lt 脕llamok fel茅 tett 煤jabb l茅p茅s 茅s ez a j枚v艖 Orb谩n n茅lk眉l is meg fog val贸sulni.

Mi, a Demokratikus Koal铆ci贸 k茅pvisel艖i, egy olyan Eur贸p谩ban hisz眉nk, amely nemcsak gazdas谩gi 茅s politikai, hanem val贸di biztons谩gi k枚z枚ss茅g is. Er艖s Eur贸pa = biztons谩gos Magyarorsz谩g. Mi ennek megval贸s铆t谩s谩n dolgozunk az Eur贸pai Parlamentben.

听听Victor Negrescu (S&D), 卯n scris. 鈥� 脦n contextul actual marcat de evolu葲ii geopolitice complexe, devine esen葲ial s膬 consolid膬m industria de ap膬rare european膬 葯i s膬 investim strategic 卯n securitatea Uniunii Europene. Pentru a realiza acest obiectiv, este esen葲ial s膬 mobiliz膬m resursele europene disponibile, s膬 sprijinim inovarea 卯n domeniul ap膬r膬rii 葯i s膬 dezvolt膬m capacit膬葲ile na葲ionale de ap膬rare.

脦n acest sens, Rom芒nia are un poten葲ial semnificativ de a deveni un actor important 卯n industria de ap膬rare european膬, 卯ns膬 pentru aceasta trebuie s膬 ac葲ion膬m rapid 葯i strategic. Este necesar s膬 simplific膬m procedurile administrative, s膬 implic膬m mediul de afaceri, s膬 cre膬m parteneriate strategice cu statele membre 葯i s膬 dezvolt膬m proiecte concrete, care s膬 contribuie direct la 卯nt膬rirea capacit膬葲ilor de ap膬rare. 脦n acela葯i timp, trebuie s膬 elabor膬m 葯i s膬 implement膬m un plan na葲ional de dezvoltare a industriei de ap膬rare, care s膬 alinieze Rom芒nia la standardele 葯i obiectivele europene.

Avem nevoie de o viziune european膬 de ap膬rare care s膬 r膬spund膬 eficient provoc膬rilor externe, dar 葯i s膬 ofere o perspectiv膬 strategic膬 pe termen lung. Doar printr-o abordare colectiv膬 葯i unitar膬 putem construi o Europ膬 capabil膬 s膬 fac膬 fa葲膬 amenin葲膬rilor actuale 葯i viitoare.

听听Bogdan Rzo艅ca (ECR), na pi艣mie. 鈥� Europa stoi przed kluczowym momentem w zakresie swojej obronno艣ci. Rosn膮ce zagro偶enia, takie jak wojna w Ukrainie, cyberataki i dezinformacja, wymagaj膮 natychmiastowych dzia艂a艅. Musimy wzmocni膰 nasze zdolno艣ci obronne i wyci膮gn膮膰 wnioski z przesz艂o艣ci, unikaj膮c iluzji, 偶e mo偶emy zapewni膰 bezpiecze艅stwo kontynentu w izolacji od naszych strategicznych sojusznik贸w. Bia艂a ksi臋ga to krok w stron臋 zwi臋kszenia naszego zaanga偶owania, ale musi ono przek艂ada膰 si臋 na realne dzia艂ania, a nie tylko deklaracje.

Ka偶da inicjatywa wzmacniaj膮ca obronno艣膰 Europy powinna uzupe艂nia膰, a nie dublowa膰 rol臋 NATO. Obecny projekt rezolucji budzi niepok贸j, poniewa偶 promuje alternatyw臋 dla Sojuszu i podwa偶a autonomi臋 pa艅stw cz艂onkowskich w kwestiach obronnych. Co wi臋cej, mo偶e prowadzi膰 do niepotrzebnych napi臋膰 w relacjach z USA 鈥� naszym kluczowym sojusznikiem.

Europa musi inwestowa膰 w realne bezpiecze艅stwo: odbudow臋 zdolno艣ci produkcyjnych, uzupe艂nianie zapas贸w oraz wzmacnianie transatlantyckich wi臋zi. Kluczowe jest tak偶e, aby wszystkie pa艅stwa cz艂onkowskie wype艂nia艂y swoje zobowi膮zania obronne, wzorem Polski, kt贸ra ju偶 dzi艣 wydaje 5% PKB na ten cel. Tylko w ten spos贸b zapewnimy stabilno艣膰 i odstraszanie.

听听Mihai Tudose (S&D), 卯n scris. 鈥� Am votat rezolu牛ia care prezint膬 propunerile Parlamentului European pentru documentul-cadru ce trebuie s膬 asigure Europei capacitatea de a se ap膬ra singur膬 la orizontul anului 2030. Rezolu牛ia identific膬 卯n mod corect deficien葲ele structurale ale bazei industriale tehnologice de ap膬rare a UE 鈥� 卯n special fragmentarea, subfinan牛area 艧i lipsa competitivit膬牛ii. Drept urmare, este nevoie de pasul decisiv spre crearea unei pie葲e europene unice a ap膬r膬rii. De aceea, rezolu牛ia noastr膬 are la baz膬 dou膬 principii esen牛iale: coeren牛a 艧i suveranitatea european膬 卯n plan militar. M膬surile concrete pe care le propunem merg de la achizi牛iile publice comune pentru ap膬rare, la crearea unui sistem european de certificare a armelor, precum 艧i de la 卯nfiin葲area unei b膬nci pentru ap膬rare, securitate 葯i rezilien葲膬, la crearea unei flote aeriene a UE de r膬spuns 卯n situa葲ii de criz膬 艧i la investi牛ii masive 卯n infrastructura de mobilitate militar膬. Sus牛in, totodat膬, cererea ferm膬 de transform膬ri majore 卯n plan decizional, prin crearea unui Consiliu al mini葯trilor ap膬r膬rii 葯i trecerea de la votul 卯n unanimitate la votul cu majoritate calificat膬 pentru hot膬r芒rile ce privesc securitatea european膬.

听听Sebastian Tynkkynen (ECR), in writing. 鈥� Europe鈥檚 defence stands at a crossroads鈥� we must rearm ourselves now.

My home country, Finland, shares the EU鈥檚 longest border with Russia鈥攐ver 1,300 kilometres.

The Finnish Defence Forces have shown how decades of commitment is now bearing fruit.

Conscription, military training, and investments in defence have long been among the EU鈥檚 best.

We are ready to defend our borders.

Meanwhile, some EU countries have neglected their duties, keeping defence spending minimal while expecting others to bear the burden.

Now the era of free riding is over 鈥� we cannot start to fund countries that have failed to prepare.

Defence is not a charity - it鈥檚 everyone鈥檚 duty.