合法博彩网站

听听President. 鈥� On the proposal of the Committee on Legal Affairs, 合法博彩网站 verifies the credentials of Sirpa Pietik盲inen, Andi Cristea and Liudas Ma啪ylis with effect from 1 December, 2 December and 5 December 2024, respectively.

I would like to announce that I will take three requests for points of order, and then we will go to the vote. So a little patience from your side, but it will not be too long, I hope. The first one will be Mr听Vistisen, please.

听听Anders Vistisen (PfE). 鈥� Madam听President, it's very nice that you can say that even before I said anything. This is a point of order under Rule 188. We have introduced amendments from the Patriots for Europe Group where we wanted not only to pause the very harmful directive we are voting on today, but abolish them altogether. It is a shame that this very, very young legislation that has not even entered into force, that we today cannot vote on taking back that initiative. And it is a shame that the Commission and the majority who adopted it will not allow us to show who is in favour of repealing it and who is not.

But the point of order is in reality also going on the fact that even on the plenary website, the amendments are not shown, and we can see other amendments that have been rejected from the services are shown on the website. So we would like an explanation in our group on why we cannot prove to the people that the Patriots for Europe introduced these amendments. Why have they been taken away from the website? We are looking very much forward to get an answer from the services.

听听President. 鈥� Thank you very much. Your amendments were declared inadmissible according to Rule 188(1)(a) of the Rules of Procedure, as they did not directly relate to the text that they sought to amend.

In fact, your amendments were aiming at repealing the directives, while the Commission proposal is only proposing to postpone the date from which the Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements.

They were never published because they were ruled inadmissible. So there you have your answer.

听听Matthieu Valet (PfE). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, mon rappel repose sur l鈥檃rticle听188 de notre r猫glement. Vous avez jug茅 irrecevable notre amendement num茅ro听5 脿 la r茅solution sur l鈥橧ran, au motif qu鈥檌l 茅tait hors sujet.

Pourtant, dans le cadre de cette r茅solution, nous d茅non莽ons la pers茅cution des femmes dans ce pays, qui est li茅e 脿 l鈥檃pplication stricte de la charia. L鈥檃mendement de mon groupe vise 脿 alerter sur le fait que cette loi islamique est aujourd鈥檋ui port茅e par certaines communaut茅s, dont les Fr猫res musulmans, en Europe, qui pr么nent un islam politique pour remplacer la loi du peuple.

La France, l鈥橝llemagne, les Pays-Bas, la Belgique ou encore l鈥橧talie sont aujourd鈥檋ui en premi猫re ligne face 脿 cet islamisme radical port茅 par ces communaut茅s. Madame la Pr茅sidente, craignez-vous 脿 ce point les fondamentalistes pour dissuader les repr茅sentants du peuple dans ce Parlement de s鈥檈xprimer d茅mocratiquement sur ce sujet majeur au moyen de cet amendement?

听听President. 鈥� Thank you very much. The amendment was declared inadmissible by the President because it was out of the scope of the resolution. And the President's decision is final.

听听Tomasz Froelich (ESN). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin! Auch ich berufe mich auf Artikel听188 der Gesch盲ftsordnung. Sie haben meinen 脛nderungsantrag听2 f眉r unzul盲ssig erkl盲rt mit der Begr眉ndung, dass Lukaschenkos Einsatz von Migranten gegen die EU-Au脽engrenze und Polen keinen direkten Zusammenhang mit dem Text habe. Das sehe ich anders, und ich bitte um 脺berpr眉fung. Wenn wir in diesem Text beschlie脽en d眉rfen, Operationen wei脽russischer Geheimdienste und wei脽russischen Desinformationskampagnen entgegenzuwirken, dann m眉ssen wir doch erst recht beschlie脽en k枚nnen, dass wir uns vor Lukaschenkos Migrationswaffe sch眉tzen.

Und ich stelle zudem fest: Die Abstimmungsliste war gestern Nacht bereits fertig, und mein 脛nderungsantrag wurde darin ber眉cksichtigt. Dass dieser heute Morgen gestrichen wurde, irritiert mich. Offenkundig hat mein 脛nderungsantrag einige in die Bredouille gebracht听鈥� gerade die Kollegen von der EVP, die ihm eigentlich zustimmen m眉ssten.

Also ich sch盲tze ja Frau Metsola und das Pr盲sidium wirklich sehr, aber ich muss trotzdem daran erinnern: Frau Metsola ist Pr盲sidentin des Europ盲ischen Parlaments und nicht Pr盲sidentin der EVP听鈥� und diese Entscheidung ist parteiisch.

听听President. 鈥� Thank you very much. The amendment was declared inadmissible for the same reason as the last one: because it was outside the scope of the resolution. And the President's decision is final.