Ϸվ

Go back to the Europarl portal

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg-български
  • es-español
  • cs-čeština
  • da-dansk
  • de-Deutsch
  • et-eesti keel
  • el-ελληνικά
  • en-English
  • fr-français
  • ga-Gaeilge
  • hr-hrvatski
  • it-italiano
  • lv-latviešu valoda
  • lt-lietuvių kalba
  • hu-magyar
  • mt-Malti
  • nl-Nederlands
  • pl-polski
  • pt-português
  • ro-română
  • sk-slovenčina
  • sl-slovenščina
  • fi-suomi
  • sv-svenska
Index
Full text
Verbatim report of proceedings
Tuesday, 23 October 2012-Strasbourg

Multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 - Own resource based on the value added tax (debate)
MPphoto

Sandra Kalniete (PPE), in writing.(LV) Ϸվ’s position on the multiannual financial framework must be clear and rigorous: the budget amount recommended by the Commission should not be reduced. A reduced budget in the European Union would have a negative impact on economic growth and competitiveness throughout the EU, and would weaken its cohesiveness, solidarity and ability to overcome the crisis. Any reduction would restrict opportunities to ensure a fairer distribution of direct payments and proper financing of the cohesion policy. I can only support the President of the Commission, MrBarroso, who recently, in Bratislava, stated at a meeting of the Friends of Cohesion group that Europe needs political unity – the wealthier countries must agree to a wide-ranging policy, which provides for support for the less wealthy regions of Europe, since this is an investment in the growth of the European Union as a whole. I understand the political difficulties in many Member States when the EU budget is discussed. However, together with the rapporteur I would like to remind you that the EU budget represents only some 2% of total government expenditure in the Union, and is hence more than 45 times smaller than the sum of government expenditure in the Member States.

Legal notice-Privacy policy