Ϸվ

Zoznam
ʰ峦áú
ú
Úplné znenie
Postup :
Postup v rámci schôdze
Postup dokumentu : A8-0038/2019

Predkladané texty :

A8-0038/2019

Rozpravy :

PV11/02/2019-16
CRE11/02/2019-16

Hlasovanie :

PV12/02/2019-9.16
CRE12/02/2019-9.16
Vysvetlenie hlasovaní

Prijaté texty :

P8_TA(2019)0077

Doslovný zápis z rozpráv
Utorok, 12. februára 2019-Štrasburg

10.9. Vykonávanie ustanovení zmluvy týkajúcich sa posilnenej spolupráce (A8-0038/2019 - Alain Lamassoure)
Videozáznamy z vystúpení

Suulliset äänestysselitykset

MPphoto

Andrejs Mamikins (S&D). – MadamPresident, we must be careful with the tool of enhanced cooperation. First of all, by design it undermines the unity of the EU action and it has repercussions internally and externally. Second, the unanimity rule inside the coalition of the willing allows one Member State to sabotage the whole process, creating the conditions for a Trojan horse to undermine relations among Member States. Third, the real impact on enhanced cooperation is relative. Just take the example of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. It will not have jurisdiction over Hungary, Poland, Ireland, Sweden, Britain and Denmark, which opt out. As a result, combating fraud at EU level will have limited effect because these countries will be free riding. I was the shadow rapporteur of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs’ opinion to this report and I voted in favour, but I’m convinced that enhanced cooperation must aim for full cooperation, which is the ultimate goal.

Posledná úprava: 28. júna 2019Právne upozornenie-Politika ochrany súkromia