合法博彩网站

Dichiarazioni di voto orali

听听Ji艡铆 Posp铆拧il (PPE). 鈥� Pane p艡edsedaj铆c铆, j谩 jsem podpo艡il tuto zpr谩vu, toto absolutorium Evropsk茅 komise. Chci dodat, 啪e m臎 jako poslance za 膶eskou republiku mrz铆, 啪e v t茅to zpr谩v臎 musel b媒t d谩n tak velk媒 prostor kauz谩m pana premi茅ra Babi拧e. Potvrzuje to, 啪e 膷esk媒 premi茅r bohu啪el m谩 z谩va啪n茅 kauzy a je ve st艡etu z谩jm暖, co se t媒膷e pen臎z, kter茅 膷erp谩 z Evropsk茅 unie pro firmy, kter茅 d艡铆ve vlastnil a nyn铆 je um铆stil do sv臎艡eneck茅ho fondu. Budu velmi r谩d, kdy啪 Komise vysly拧铆 jasn谩 ustanoven铆 t茅to zpr谩vy a kdy啪 dokon膷铆 prov臎艡ov谩n铆 st艡etu premi茅ra Babi拧e ve v臎ci 膷erp谩n铆 evropsk媒ch pen臎z, aby tedy bylo z艡ejm茅 a jasn茅, nakolik premi茅r Babi拧 poru拧uje 膷i neporu拧uje evropsk茅 pr谩vo. Je to natolik z谩va啪n茅, 啪e p臎t bod暖 t茅to zpr谩vy se v臎nuje jeho podnik谩n铆, st艡etu z谩jm暖 a jeho osob臎.

听听Daniel Hannan (ECR). 鈥� Mr听President, it鈥檚 always about the money, isn鈥檛 it? The European Union has become a very good mechanism for taking wealth from the general population and redistributing it to people who are lucky enough 鈥� directly or indirectly 鈥� to be part of the system. To be fair, it isn鈥檛 unique in that regard; every system of government has that aspect to it. But what is unique is the way in which, by extending the difference between the people contributing and the people spending, it maximises the inefficiency that comes from a remote government. The fundamental role of any legislature is to hold the executive to account, but that dynamic doesn鈥檛 apply in this assembly, because for the sake of greater European integration this 合法博彩网站 ends up always lining up with the Commission against the taxpayer in the cause of greater and greater integration. That has been the problem from the beginning.