合法博彩网站

听听Puhemies. 鈥� Esityslistalla on seuraavana Niels Fuglsangin talous- ja raha-asioiden valiokunnan puolesta laatima mietint枚 Pandoran papereista ja muista paljastuksista saaduista kokemuksista () (A9-0095/2023).

听听Niels Fuglsang, rapporteur. 鈥� Madam President, colleagues, dear Commissioner, thank you for being here today, and I look forward to this hopefully fruitful debate on a very important issue, namely the Pandora Papers and the lessons learned from the Pandora Papers.

So the obvious question is what have we learned from the Pandora Papers? Well, the way I see it, we have learned that some people simply refuse to play by the rules, some people at the very top of our society when it comes to wealth and fortune.

Colleagues, I have to ask you, did anyone on this floor count on the extent to which this system is rigged? Absolutely rigged. If you look at the Pandora Papers, well you have two systems, not one system but two systems, one applying to the 99听% of people going to work every day, contributing to society, paying their fair share of taxes and another system applying to the top 1听%, those who can, if they wish to, refuse to pay their taxes, refuse to contribute to society because they hire tax advisers to create offshore shell companies and fake trusts where they hide their wealth and hide their fortunes so they don鈥檛 contribute and they don鈥檛 pay taxes. That has to change. That is what we see in the Pandora Papers that these two systems of rules are applying, that the system is basically rigged.

That is why we have proposed, in this report that we are voting on tomorrow, a number of proposals on how to fix the system. And I hope that we can stand together. I am very proud of the result that we achieved in the committee, where not a single member voted against these proposals. It was a broad majority from left to right, agreeing that we need to do more, and we need some new rules to fix this system.

I would like to highlight three basic proposals that we have. We have a lot of proposals, but among those are, well, one, we need to look at the possibility of having a minimum tax on capital gains. We know that those who have capital gains, those who have stocks, those who have real estate, those who have other forms of capital and earn money from that, that is the people at the very top of our society. And they should also contribute. And they are not always doing that, according to the Pandora Papers, these are the people who are moving this kind of wealth, this kind of capital offshore in shell companies and avoiding contributing. That is why we need a minimum level of capital gains. We need to look at that. We need to have that analysis to see if that鈥檚 feasible, because that would be something which would make sure that no country would have 0听% tax on capital gains.

Second, we need to look at the advisory companies, the audit companies that make this show go on. Those who advice on how you can create shell companies and move fortunes overseas. Those companies are often both audit companies and financial advisers, and obviously that鈥檚 a conflict of interest. If you first give financial advice on how you can move wealth offshore and then next you ordered the companies or the person鈥檚 accounts, you鈥檙e not going to find any trouble because you have a conflict of interest, so we propose in this report to separate the audit departments from the financial advice departments.

Third, we need to look at the shell companies and have rules against empty shell companies. That has been proposed by the European Commission, that is being negotiated here in 合法博彩网站, we have agreed that we should have these rules, but in the Council among the Member States, they are stuck, they cannot agree on it and we urge the Council to continue the work and agree on rules that will ban the shell companies. That鈥檚 what we want in the European 合法博彩网站.

I look forward to this debate. We have a lot of proposals and I look forward to hearing from you what we can do and what we have learned from the Pandora Papers.

听听Didier Reynders, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, honourable Members, I am taking the floor during this debate with the blessing, again, of Commissioner Gentiloni. First, let me thank the European 合法博彩网站 for its relentless commitment to tax fairness and strong reaction to the Pandora Papers.

As you rightly note, such revelations demonstrate the crucial role investigative journalists play in exposing tax evasion, corruption, organised crime and money laundering. They also illustrate that fighting tax evasion and tax avoidance is a constant struggle. We need to keep on improving the legislation and tighten our net. Rest assured that it is a top priority for the Commission.

As you know, we proposed at the end of 2022 a new amendment to the Directive on Administrative Cooperation to include the reporting and automatic exchange of tax information on transactions in crypto-assets and e-money, strengthening the current Directive and covering aspects that are necessary to ensure its correct functioning.

Moreover, we are currently working towards agreement in Council on the key initiative to fight the misuse of shell entities for improper tax purposes. The 鈥榰nshell鈥� proposal will ensure that entities in the EU without a minimum degree of economic substance are unable to benefit from any tax advantages and do not place any financial burden on taxpayers. The Commission would like to thank you once again for your strong support and constructive suggestions on this proposal.

This Commission and 合法博彩网站 are allies in promoting standards of tax fairness and transparency further, within the European Union and beyond. Your continuous support on 鈥榰nshell鈥� is precious, and the Commission hopes you will continue to push for an agreement on an ambitious compromise by the Council. Of course, the use of shell companies also has an external dimension, one we have committed to tackling as well.

We want to offer to Member States additional tools to tackle tax arrangements or schemes in non-EU countries that lead to tax evasion or aggressive tax planning. In order to take these further steps, it is therefore even more important that the Member States prove themselves capable of reaching an agreement on the proposed directive on preventing shell companies with the European Union.

Your report points to the growing challenges in the area of non-corporate tax regime. The Code of Conduct Group has been working intensively to strengthen the EU listing process over the last few months, and we have a common interest to advance certain areas of work. In particular, the Group focuses on the revision of the EU listing criteria and is considering a more robust approach to zero-tax jurisdictions. However, more remains to be done regarding information on beneficial ownership or the extension of the geographical scope of the EU list.

We also agree with your suggestion to expand the mandate of the Code of Conduct to personal and capital income taxation. Now we need to convince the Member States to support a further strengthening of the EU listing process.

But our actions do not stop here. In your report, you rightfully discuss the role that intermediaries play in facilitating tax avoidance and evasion. The Commission is adopting an additional proposal which will reinforce our arsenal against fraudulent tax practices. Our objective with it is two-fold: making withholding tax procedures more efficient and ensuring that the current initiative includes all necessary safeguards to prevent fraudulent refunds and abusive tax schemes.

Finally, as you know, the Commission is working on BEFIT, Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation, a new corporate tax system for the European Union. This is a flagship of our new ambitious business tax agenda, reflecting some of the very priorities included in the report we are discussing here today.

I want to thank the rapporteur and all the members involved for their valuable work. And now, of course, I will listen to your interventions and proposals.

听听Udo Bullmann, Verfasser der Stellungnahme des mitberatenden Entwicklungsausschusses. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, werte Kolleginnen und Kollegen, Herr Kommissar! Wir kennen die Zahlen. Ein Kontinent wie Afrika verliert j盲hrlich rund 80听Milliarden US-Dollar allein durch illegale Kapitalflucht. Das ist ungef盲hr der Betrag, den Afrika braucht f眉r seine j盲hrlichen Modernisierungsinvestitionen, f眉r Schulen, f眉r Krankenh盲user und f眉r Verkehrswege. Wann werden wir endlich wach und ziehen daraus die n枚tigen Konsequenzen?

Ja, wir wollen globale Mindeststeuern, wie der Berichterstatter Fuglsang es zu Recht fordert. Ja, wir wollen effektive Steuersysteme, unseren Partnerl盲ndern helfen听鈭� f眉r anst盲ndige Beh枚rden, die ihre Arbeit machen. Aber zuvorderst: Wir m眉ssen unsere eigenen Steueroasen trockenlegen, daf眉r sorgen, dass wir nicht selber den Briefkastenfirmen und den Steuerhinterziehern Vorschub leisten. Das ist die Tagesaufgabe, wenn wir die Probleme bew盲ltigen wollen und international daf眉r sorgen wollen, dass es eine bessere Zusammenarbeit bei der Steuerpolitik gibt.

听听Damien Car锚me, rapporteur pour avis de la commission des libert茅s civiles, de la justice et des affaires int茅rieures. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Monsieur le Commissaire, 11听300听milliards听de dollars, ce serait la somme astronomique dissimul茅e dans des paradis fiscaux, selon les r茅v茅lations du Consortium international des journalistes d鈥檌nvestigation. Ces 11听300听milliards d鈥櫭﹙asion fiscale et de blanchiment sont 脿 mettre en parall猫le avec les 17听000听milliards de PIB de l鈥橴nion europ茅enne en听2021. Les chiffres donnent le vertige.

La liste des b茅n茅ficiaires de ces montages financiers g茅n猫re un profond sentiment de malaise. Des dirigeants europ茅ens anciens comme actuels, d鈥檃utres en poste au moment des Pandora Papers, et donc en mesure d鈥檈mp锚cher toute avanc茅e fiscale pour leur seul int茅r锚t personnel. Pourtant, aucun nom dans cette r茅solution, pas de naming and shaming: c鈥檈st la r猫gle dans certains groupes politiques, ici, au Parlement. Pourquoi donc mentionner Wopke听Hoekstra, actuel ministre n茅erlandais, Andrej听Babi拧, alors Premier ministre tch猫que, ou John听Dalli, ancien ministre maltais et ancien commissaire europ茅en?

R茅cemment, PwC a fait fuiter des documents confidentiels sur les projets de lutte contre l鈥櫭﹙asion fiscale des multinationales du gouvernement australien. Un scandale fiscal de plus pour PwC, d茅j脿 au c艙ur des LuxLeaks, en听2014, et, jamais tr猫s loin, ses acolytes du Big Four, ces quatre grands cabinets qui se partagent 87听% du march茅 mondial du conseil fiscal. Les Pandora Papers l鈥檕nt confirm茅: c鈥檈st gr芒ce 脿 ce type d鈥檌nterm茅diaires que les 0,01听% les plus riches 茅chappent 脿 environ 25听% de leurs obligations fiscales. Pourtant, que de n茅gociations pour citer PwC, Ernst听&听Young, Deloitte et KPMG dans cette r茅solution! Pas de naming and shaming, vous vous souvenez?

Des 脡tats membres proposent des taxations avantageuses pour attirer les nomades num茅riques, au risque d鈥檃ggraver les in茅galit茅s sociales et 茅conomiques. Mais, l脿 encore, pas de naming and shaming. Pourquoi rappeler que Chypre, la Croatie, l鈥橢spagne, la Gr猫ce, l鈥橧talie et le Portugal offrent des r茅gimes possiblement nocifs pour le march茅 unique et les recettes fiscales? Pourquoi? Parce que 芦mal nommer les choses, c鈥檈st ajouter au malheur de ce monde禄. 脌 cette citation d鈥橝lbert Camus j鈥檃jouterai que ne pas les nommer du tout, c鈥檈st refuser de mettre fin au malheur du monde.

Tirons les le莽ons des Pandora Papers: nommons, bl芒mons, soyons ambitieux. En s鈥檈xprimant pour la premi猫re fois sur une meilleure taxation du capital des personnes fortun茅es et des plus-values sur les nomades num茅riques et la financiarisation du logement, notre Parlement ouvre la voie 脿 des syst猫mes fiscaux plus justes.

Chers coll猫gues, adoptons ce texte, renfor莽ons-le gr芒ce aux amendements du rapporteur, dont certains sugg茅r茅s par mon groupe des Verts/ALE, et rejetons toute tentative, lamentable, de l鈥檃ffaiblir.

听听Herbert Dorfmann, im Namen der PPE-Fraktion. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, Herr Kommissar, Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Die Pandora Papers haben ein Konstrukt von 眉ber 29听000 Steuervermeidungs- und Steuerhinterziehungskonten offengelegt. Und das Ziel ist klar: Es geht darum, Steuern zu vermeiden, sich auf Kosten der Staaten und damit der Allgemeinheit zu bereichern und damit schlicht und ergreifend Geld zu stehlen, das den Menschen in Europa zustehen w眉rde. Das kann man nur verurteilen, und das tun wir mit diesem Bericht auch.

Aber es geht nicht unbedingt darum, mit den Fingern auf Einzelne zu zeigen, sondern einfach zu analysieren, was passiert ist, und zu schauen, wo wir in Zukunft ansetzen k枚nnen. Insofern geht es meiner Meinung nach viel mehr um die Zukunft als um die Vergangenheit. Nat眉rlich m眉ssen wir da auch unsere eigenen Regeln kritisch hinterfragen und unsere eigenen Regeln dort, wo es notwendig ist, versch盲rfen. Steueroasen, Systeme am Rande der Legalit盲t听鈭� und auch des ethisch Vertretbaren听鈭� gibt es leider nicht nur irgendwo in der Welt, sie gibt es leider auch innerhalb der Europ盲ischen Union.

Wir sind f眉r einen fairen Steuerwettbewerb, der auf den Prinzipien der Transparenz, der Gerechtigkeit, der Zusammenarbeit basiert und der mit dem europ盲ischen Binnenmarkt auch vereinbar ist. Deshalb braucht es eine ehrliche und faire Zusammenarbeit zwischen den nationalen Steuerbeh枚rden in der Europ盲ischen Union, aber auch eine st盲rkere internationale Zusammenarbeit, mehr Informationsaustausch, umfassende Mechanismen, um Steuerhinterziehung zu bek盲mpfen.

Wir beleuchten im Bericht auch die Rolle der Intermedi盲re bei der Erleichterung von Steuerhinterziehung. Es bedarf konsequenter Ma脽nahmen gegen Steuerberater, die Systeme der Hinterziehung und aggressive Steuerplanung entwickeln und verkaufen. Aber es ergibt keinen Sinn, gro脽e Beratungsfirmen einfach pauschal zu verurteilen oder ihre Zerschlagung zu fordern.

Ich denke, wir brauchen auch einen Rahmen f眉r Quellensteuern. Die signifikant unterschiedlichen Steuers盲tze in den Mitgliedstaaten und in Drittstaaten werden immer eine Kapitalverschiebung dorthin beg眉nstigen, wo gerade geringe oder keine Steuern zu bezahlen sind. Dies ist in Angriff zu nehmen. Kapitalgewinne sollen zumindest einmal besteuert werden. Es liegt nun an uns听鈭� hier im Europ盲ischen Parlament, aber vor allem auch in den Mitgliedstaaten听鈭�, endlich eigene Egoismen hintanzustellen, wirksame Regeln zu implementieren, die zu mehr Gerechtigkeit in der Besteuerung f眉hren und die endlich den Schlaumeiern den Wind aus den Segeln nehmen.

听听Evelyn Regner, im Namen der S&D-Fraktion. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, sehr geehrter Herr Kommissar! Die Pandora Papers: Was ist das? Das sind knapp 12听Millionen geheime Dokumente, die die Steuergeheimnisse von K枚nigen, von Pr盲sidenten, von Stars, von Geldw盲schern, von Betr眉gern l眉ften. Vergeblich sucht man hier Pflegepersonal, Handwerker, Handwerkerinnen, Verk盲uferinnen. Damit ist klar: Die Offshore-Welt ist eine Welt der Reichen und Superreichen.

Bis zu 32听Billionen Dollar sollen weltweit in Steuers眉mpfen versteckt sein. Das ist 眉brigens mehr als das BIP der USA, und das zu einer Zeit, in der wir h盲nderingend nach neuen Einnahmequellen suchen. Also was tun? Die Antwort: Wir brauchen mehr Transparenz, ein koordiniertes Vorgehen, um Steuers眉mpfe auszutrocknen, au脽erhalb wie innerhalb Europas. Public CbCR, die 枚ffentliche Konzernsteuertransparenz-Richtlinie, die wir 2021 erfolgreich beschlossen haben, ist ein Anfang. Aber nat眉rlich brauchen wir noch viel mehr. Es muss noch viel weiter gehen.

Holen wir uns das Geld zur眉ck, das den Menschen zusteht. Denn es gibt genug Geld auf dieser Welt. Man muss es nur gerecht verteilen.

And to all those Members that might hesitate still, I can really just say: this report is excellent. Vote for it!

听听Billy Kelleher, on behalf of the Renew Group. 鈥� Madam听President, I want to commend the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists who exposed the Pandora Papers, and many other areas of tax evasion and aggressive tax planning that have taken place over the last ten years.

Multiple billions are not going to where they should be in terms of investment in public services right across the globe, and particularly in countries that have very challenging budgetary positions already.

But these particular papers showed that at the heart of Governments, at the heart of 合法博彩网站s, at the heart of the highest end of businesses, we have aggressive tax evasion and tax planning.

And, in large part, it is being facilitated. It is being facilitated by our lack of creativity in terms of funding revenue commissioners across the European Union, in terms of ensuring that we have cross鈥攂order investigative supports, but also our auditing companies, our legal firms are involved in promoting and facilitating tax evasion.

And that is something that we have to accept. There has to be serious sanction. This is a criminal offence, but there seems to be a view that while 鈥榳hite collar鈥� crime is very often spoken about, very little is done in terms of putting in place the legislation, the supports to investigate and to deter but more importantly in the event of a being discovered that there is genuine sanction.

We cannot continue to depend on journalists to be the ones that should be exposing this. If we had the legislation and if we had investigative capabilities and tools, it is the authorities should be exposing this and punishing those that are found guilty of tax evasion and aggressive tax planning.

听听Rasmus Andresen, im Namen der Verts/ALE-Fraktion. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin! 11,9听Millionen Dokumente, 29听000 Konten, 330 Politikerinnen und Politiker, aber auch sehr viele Gesch盲ftsleute und Prominente wie Elton John oder der Trainer von Real Madrid, Ancelotti. Die Pandora Papers sind die gr枚脽te Recherche zu Steuerhinterziehung und 鈥攙ermeidung. Und es ist dem Mut von Journalistinnen und Journalisten zu verdanken, dass dieser Betrug听鈭� zum Gl眉ck, will ich hinzuf眉gen听鈭� aufgeflogen ist.

Jetzt ist es Zeit f眉r Konsequenzen. Das Gesch盲ftsmodell von Steueroasen muss durch Mindeststeuers盲tze, beispielsweise auf Kapitalertr盲ge, zerst枚rt werden. Seitenwechsel von Steuerverwaltungen zu Consultingagenturen m眉ssen st盲rker kontrolliert werden. Deshalb brauchen wir sch盲rfere Karenzzeiten. Die Macht der gro脽en Beraterfirmen wie PricewaterhouseCoopers, EY, Deloitte oder aber auch KPMG muss eingeschr盲nkt werden.

Wir Steuern hinterzieht, begeht ein Verbrechen an unserer Gesellschaft. Steuerhinterziehung ist kein Kavaliersdelikt. Kleine Menschen k枚nnen sich Steuerhinterziehung gar nicht leisten; es sind die Gro脽en, die Superreichen, die sich nicht an unserer Gesellschaft beteiligen. Es wird Zeit, dass wir handeln.

听听And偶elika Anna Mo偶d偶anowska, w imieniu grupy ECR. 鈥� Pani Przewodnicz膮ca! Panie Komisarzu! Blisko 8 bilion贸w euro, co stanowi 8% 艣wiatowego Produktu Krajowego Brutto, to warto艣膰 maj膮tku finansowego znajduj膮cego si臋 w rajach podatkowych. Kr贸tko m贸wi膮c, jest to uszczuplenie 艣wiatowych dochod贸w podatkowych o oko艂o 155 miliard贸w euro rocznie. Cz臋sto do艣wiadczamy, jak bogate osoby na wysokich stanowiskach, a cz臋sto nawet przest臋pcy, wykorzystuj膮c nowoczesne techniki, systemy i mo偶liwo艣ci, kreatywnie wykorzystuj膮c bankowo艣膰 i optymalizacj臋 prawno-podatkowo-fiskaln膮, tworz膮 z艂o偶one struktury w celu ochrony swoich dochod贸w i aktyw贸w przed opodatkowaniem, sankcjami i prawnymi zobowi膮zaniami, umo偶liwiaj膮c pranie pieni臋dzy czy finansowanie terroryzmu.

Dzi艣 to ma艂y krok, ale wa偶ny krok w walce o przejrzysto艣膰 i jasne zasady funkcjonowania. Nie mog臋 jednak zgodzi膰 si臋 z propozycj膮 wi臋kszej centralizacji, w tym odej艣cia od zasady jednog艂o艣nego podejmowania decyzji. Kluczem do sukcesu jest skuteczna koordynacja, a nie tylko harmonizacja i ujednolicenie. System podatkowy jest istotnym elementem kszta艂towania ca艂ego systemu polityki gospodarczej. Szanowanie suwerenno艣ci podatkowej pa艅stw cz艂onkowskich powinno by膰 dla nas szczeg贸lnie wa偶nym priorytetem.

Polska od lat skutecznie walczy z oszustwami podatkowymi i uchylaniem si臋 od opodatkowania. Jednak sukces ten, jak r贸wnie偶 sukces ka偶dego z pa艅stw cz艂onkowskich, powinien by膰 impulsem do solidarnej wsp贸艂pracy wszystkich pozosta艂ych. Dzisiaj przede wszystkim potrzebna jest zdecydowana i twarda polityka wobec ka偶dego z raj贸w podatkowych. Konkurencja podatkowa jest zdrowa, o ile regu艂y s膮 przejrzyste. Podobnie przejrzyste powinny by膰 regu艂y dotycz膮ce braku konfliktu interes贸w, zatrudnienia i dzia艂alno艣ci lobbingowej we wszystkich europejskich instytucjach.

VORSITZ: EVELYN REGNER
痴颈锄别辫谤盲蝉颈诲别苍迟颈苍

听听France Jamet, au nom du groupe ID. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Monsieur听Reynders, mes chers coll猫gues, si les scandales fiscaux se multiplient et d茅pouillent nos concitoyens de centaines de milliards d鈥檈uros, c鈥檈st que vous avez rendu tout cela possible avec la suppression des fronti猫res et la promotion de la libre circulation des biens, des capitaux et des personnes. On pourrait m锚me y ajouter une 茅trange d茅pendance consentie aux investisseurs nomades, aux soci茅t茅s 茅crans et aux fiducies, contre lesquels les gouvernements concern茅s ne font pour ainsi dire rien.

Pandora Papers, Panama Papers, LuxLeaks: tous ces noms symbolisent ni plus ni moins que la r茅ussite d鈥檜ne oligarchie mondiale toujours prompte 脿 imposer l鈥檃ust茅rit茅 et les sacrifices uniquement au peuple. Car, chaque fois, les b茅n茅fices sont priv茅s et les dettes deviennent publiques, et ce sont nos citoyens qui en font les frais, les criminels qui s鈥檈nrichissent et nos nations qui s鈥檃ppauvrissent, selon le Consortium international des journalistes d鈥檌nvestigation.

H茅las, la liste de v艙ux pieux consign茅s dans ce rapport ne fera pas grand mal. Rien ne contribuera ou ne sera de nature 脿 r茅gler la source du probl猫me tant que la repr茅sentation publique et nos institutions seront obsessionnellement monopolis茅es par le souci de servir le financiarisme. Le capitalisme de connivence et nos d茅mocraties sont incompatibles.

Parce qu鈥檜n 脡tat qui se respecte doit 锚tre en mesure de poursuivre, de d茅fendre et de promouvoir les int茅r锚ts de la soci茅t茅 qu鈥檌l repr茅sente, nous en appelons 脿 un retour aux fronti猫res. Pour lutter contre le blanchiment et la fraude fiscale, il faut restaurer la souverainet茅 des nations et surtout exprimer une volont茅 claire, politique, assum茅e et de port茅e internationale, une souverainet茅 qui refuse et combatte r茅ellement le brigandage des peuples auquel se livrent ces pr茅dateurs.

听听Jos茅 Gusm茫o, em nome do Grupo The Left. 鈥� Senhora Presidente, quem ouve estes debates poder谩 sempre ficar a pensar que toda a gente neste Parlamento est谩 muito preocupada com a evas茫o, a elis茫o e a fraude fiscais, mas na realidade n茫o 茅 bem assim. Este 茅 um debate que divide este Parlamento e basta ver as posi莽玫es que os grupos de direita sistematicamente assumem nas quest玫es de evas茫o fiscal.

Primeiro, nunca dizer os nomes dos governantes, das empresas, dos governos, dos pa铆ses que promovem a evas茫o e o dumping fiscal, fazendo o contr谩rio do que os 芦Pandora Papers禄 fizeram, escondendo aquilo que os 芦Pandora Papers禄 revelaram.

Segundo, como ali谩s se est谩 neste momento a ver nas negocia莽玫es do relat贸rio sobre a DAC 8, impedir 鈥� e h谩 anos que impedem 鈥�, a partilha de informa莽茫o sobre os detentores de informa莽茫o, os detentores de rendimento, de imobili谩rio ou de ativos financeiros, para podermos seguir o rasto do dinheiro. Medida que registo 茅 indispens谩vel para conseguirmos combater eficazmente a evas茫o fiscal e tamb茅m, como vimos recentemente nos relat贸rios sobre a regula莽茫o das criptomoedas, criar al莽ap玫es para n茫o conseguirmos detetar as transa莽玫es que s茫o feitas em criptomoeda, dessa forma viabilizando um dos principais instrumentos de evas茫o fiscal nos momentos atuais.

听听螞蔚蠀蟿苇蟻畏蟼 螡喂魏慰位维慰蠀-螒位伪尾维谓慰蟼 (NI). 鈥� 螝蠀蟻委伪 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 慰喂 伪蟺慰魏伪位蠉蠄蔚喂蟼 蟿蠅谓 Pandora Papers 魏伪喂 维位位蠅谓 位喂蟽蟿蠋谓 魏伪喂 papers, 蠈蟺蠅蟼 畏 位委蟽蟿伪 螞伪纬魏维蟻谓蟿, 蠁苇蟻谓慰蠀谓 蟽蟿慰 蟺蟻慰蟽魏萎谓喂慰 蟿畏谓 蔚渭蟺位慰魏萎 魏蟻伪蟿喂魏蠋谓 魏蠀尾蔚蟻谓畏蟿喂魏蠋谓 蟽蟿蔚位蔚蠂蠋谓, 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏蠋谓, 渭蔚纬伪位慰蔚蟺喂蠂蔚喂蟻畏渭伪蟿喂蠋谓 蟽蔚 蠁慰蟻慰未喂伪蠁蠀纬萎 魏伪喂 蠁慰蟻慰伪蟺维蟿畏. 螌渭蠅蟼 蟺慰喂慰蟼 魏伪蟿苇蠂蔚喂 蟺维谓蠅 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰 50听% 蟿蠅谓 魏伪蟿伪胃苇蟽蔚蠅谓 蟽蟿慰蠀蟼 蠁慰蟻慰位慰纬喂魏慰蠉蟼 蟺伪蟻伪未蔚委蟽慰蠀蟼; 韦慰 蟺位慰蠀蟽喂蠈蟿蔚蟻慰 0,01 蟿慰蠀 蟺位畏胃蠀蟽渭慰蠉. 螘委谓伪喂 畏 慰位喂纬伪蟻蠂委伪 蟿慰蠀 蟺位慰蠉蟿慰蠀 未畏位伪未萎, 蟺慰蠀 蟺伪谓蟿慰蠉 伪蟺慰位伪渭尾维谓蔚喂 蟽蠀谓蟿蟻喂蟺蟿喂魏苇蟼 蠁慰蟻慰伪蟺伪位位伪纬苇蟼, 蟺蟻慰谓蠈渭喂伪, 蔚胃蔚位慰谓蟿喂魏萎 蠁慰蟻慰位慰纬委伪, 蟽蠀谓蔚喂蟽蠁苇蟻慰谓蟿伪蟼 蔚位维蠂喂蟽蟿伪 蟽蟿伪 苇蟽慰未伪 蟿蠅谓 魏蟻伪蟿喂魏蠋谓 蟺蟻慰蠇蟺慰位慰纬喂蟽渭蠋谓 魏伪喂 蟺伪委蟻谓慰谓蟿伪蟼 伪蟺蠈 伪蠀蟿慰蠉蟼 未喂蟽蔚魏伪蟿慰渭渭蠉蟻喂伪, 蔚谓蠋 慰 蔚蟻纬伪味蠈渭蔚谓慰蟼 位伪蠈蟼 尉蔚味慰蠀渭委味蔚蟿伪喂 未喂伪蟻魏蠋蟼 渭蔚 蠀蠄畏位慰蠉蟼 蠁蠈蟻慰蠀蟼 魏伪喂 维胃位喂慰蠀蟼 渭喂蟽胃慰蠉蟼.

螖蔚谓 蟺蟻蠈魏蔚喂蟿伪喂 纬喂伪 魏伪魏苇蟼 蔚蟺喂位慰纬苇蟼 魏维蟺慰喂蠅谓 蟺蟻慰蟽蠋蟺蠅谓. 螒蠀蟿苇蟼 慰喂 蟺蟻伪魏蟿喂魏苇蟼 蔚委谓伪喂 畏 维位位畏 蠈蠄畏 蟿畏蟼 谓蠈渭喂渭畏蟼 蠁慰蟻慰伪蟺伪位位伪纬萎蟼 魏伪喂 蠁慰蟻慰伪蟽蠀位委伪蟼 蟿慰蠀 魏蔚蠁伪位伪委慰蠀 蟺慰蠀 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 螆谓蠅蟽畏 魏伪喂 伪蟽蟿喂魏苇蟼 魏蠀尾蔚蟻谓萎蟽蔚喂蟼 蠀位慰蟺慰喂慰蠉谓. 危蟿伪 蟺位伪委蟽喂伪 伪蠀蟿慰蠉 蟿慰蠀 蟽蠀蟽蟿萎渭伪蟿慰蟼, 蟿慰蠀 伪谓蟿喂位伪蠆魏慰蠉 蠁慰蟻慰位慰纬喂魏慰蠉, 慰蟺慰喂伪未萎蟺慰蟿蔚 渭苇蟿蟻伪 胃伪 苇蠂慰蠀谓 蟿畏谓 委未喂伪 魏伪蟿维位畏尉畏: 谓伪 蟺位畏蟻蠋谓蔚喂 慰 位伪蠈蟼 魏伪喂 谓伪 蠁慰蟻慰未喂伪蠁蔚蠉纬慰蠀谓 谓蠈渭喂渭伪 萎 蟺伪蟻维谓慰渭伪 蟿伪 渭慰谓慰蟺蠋位喂伪.

螠蔚 蟺喂慰 未蠀谓伪蟿蠈 螝螝螘, 慰 位伪蠈蟼 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 伪蟺伪喂蟿萎蟽蔚喂 伪谓伪蟿蟻慰蟺萎 蟿畏蟼 蠁慰蟻慰渭蟺畏蠂蟿喂魏萎蟼 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏萎蟼 蟿畏蟼 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎蟼 螆谓蠅蟽畏蟼 魏伪喂 蟿蠅谓 伪蟽蟿喂魏蠋谓 魏蠀尾蔚蟻谓萎蟽蔚蠅谓 蟽蔚 尾维蟻慰蟼 蟿慰蠀. 桅慰蟻慰位蠈纬畏蟽畏 蟿蠅谓 渭慰谓慰蟺蠅位喂伪魏蠋谓 慰渭委位蠅谓, 45听% 蟽蟿伪 魏苇蟻未畏, 魏伪胃蠋蟼 魏伪喂 魏伪蟿维蟻纬畏蟽畏 蠈位蠅谓 蟿蠅谓 蠁慰蟻慰伪蟺伪位位伪纬蠋谓 纬喂伪 蔚魏蔚委谓慰蠀蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼 慰渭委位慰蠀蟼 蟺慰蠀 蟽蠀蟽蟽蠅蟻蔚蠉慰蠀谓 伪渭蠉胃畏蟿慰 蟺位慰蠉蟿慰.

听听L铆dia Pereira (PPE). 鈥� Senhora Presidente, as revela莽玫es dos 芦Pandora Papers禄 provam que o combate 脿 fraude e evas茫o fiscais est谩 a falhar.

Todos os milh玫es perdidos nestes esquemas s茫o milh玫es retirados aos or莽amentos nacionais, retirados 脿 sa煤de, 脿 educa莽茫o, 脿 justi莽a ou a servi莽os p煤blicos de qualidade e criam uma injusti莽a fiscal clara entre aqueles que beneficiam destes esquemas e os contribuintes que cumprem. Contribuintes esses que est茫o cada vez mais sobrecarregados com impostos altos em muitos pa铆ses da Europa, como o meu.

Este Parlamento fez o que lhe compete, discutiu as revela莽玫es e est谩 a apresentar propostas concretas. A pergunta que se imp玫e 茅, por isso, o que 茅 que est谩 a falhar?

Falha a Comiss茫o Europeia quando se atrasa em rever legisla莽茫o como a diretiva antievas茫o fiscal ou quando fica aqu茅m nas propostas para modernizar a coopera莽茫o entre autoridades fiscais nacionais.

Mas falham tamb茅m os governos nacionais. No Conselho, n茫o conseguem decidir acerca da diretiva sobre empresas de fachada e, nos seus pa铆ses, e isto 茅 particularmente evidente em Portugal, alimentam monstros burocr谩ticos que sufocam os contribuintes e que continuam a deixar janelas abertas de oportunidade para a evas茫o.

Basta, por isso, de lamentar estes esc芒ndalos entre Bruxelas e Estrasburgo. 脡 hora de as capitais nacionais apresentarem as solu莽玫es que tardam.

听听Aurore Lalucq (S&D). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Monsieur le Commissaire, chers coll猫gues, aujourd鈥檋ui tout se passe comme s鈥檌l y avait deux syst猫mes fiscaux, et donc deux syst猫mes d茅mocratiques parall猫les. D鈥檜n c么t茅 le citoyen lambda, la PME du coin, qui payent leurs imp么ts l脿 o霉 ils vivent et l脿 o霉 ils travaillent, et, de l鈥檃utre, certaines personnalit茅s ultra-riches qui, disons-le clairement, 脿 travers leur comportement, refusent le consentement 脿 l鈥檌mp么t et font s茅cession. En ayant recours 脿 des soci茅t茅s offshore et 脿 des paradis fiscaux, ils pr茅f猫rent mettre leur argent 脿 c么t茅 de la grande criminalit茅, de la mafia et des trafiquants, plut么t qu鈥檃u c么t茅 des citoyens lambda, aussi imparfaits soient-ils.

Pourtant, ces personnes ont de quoi payer dix fois, cent fois leurs imp么ts. Pourtant, ces personnes n鈥檃uraient pas 脿 payer grand-chose, d鈥檃illeurs, si elles 茅taient rest茅es et avaient d茅clar茅 leur argent sur leur territoire. En effet, les ultrariches ne paient quasiment plus rien aujourd鈥檋ui. Pourquoi? Parce que le revenu et le capital ne sont plus assez tax茅s, tant et si bien qu鈥檃ujourd鈥檋ui, mieux vaut h茅riter que travailler.

Aussi, nous soutenons ce rapport, la taxation du capital et un imp么t sur la grande fortune au niveau europ茅en.

听听Ramona Strugariu (Renew). 鈥� Madam President, the Pandora Papers scandal with over 11.9 million documents, was exposing the hidden wealth and offshore activities of individuals and entities across the globe, involving more than 330 politicians and public officials, including 35 current and former leaders. Almost two years later we鈥檙e negotiating the AML package and moving very cautiously. This House has already committed to fighting for greater transparency, accountability and fairness in our financial system, for closing the loopholes that enable tax evasion and money laundering. But I am asking the Council to be as committed as we are, and I am counting on the Commission to be an ally. I鈥檓 assuming that we all want stronger rules in place. We all want the new AMLA to be a powerful game changer with clear tasks and proper resources. These are the messages that this package must send in the end, just like the lessons we all learned from the Pandora Papers revelations. No one is above the law. The era of impunity for financial non-compliance is coming to an end and we are done with closing our eyes to washing up Putinist, illiberal and criminal money here in this Union. This is the public expectation on our mandate. This builds credibility and proves commitment, nothing less.

听听Claude Gruffat (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Monsieur le Commissaire, chers coll猫gues, les Pandora Papers ont confirm茅 une fois de plus 鈥撎齯ne fois de trop听鈥� que les 1听% de personnes les plus riches se consid猫rent au-dessus des r猫gles et que leur cupidit茅 passe avant la vie des 99听% qui restent. Ce rapport que nous allons voter ouvre la voie 脿 une soci茅t茅 plus juste, qui respecte les citoyennes et les citoyens. Une fois de plus, nous demandons 脿 la Commission et aux 脡tats membres 鈥撎齣ls ne sont m锚me pas l脿, ce soir!听鈥� de mesurer la richesse cr茅茅e par la plus-value et d鈥檌mposer cette derni猫re.

Nous sommes en pleine crise 茅conomique, et il semble que nous n鈥檃yons rien appris des erreurs du pass茅, comme en听2008. Face aux faillites bancaires, 脿 la volatilit茅 des march茅s financiers, 脿 l鈥檌nflation et 脿 l鈥檃ugmentation des marges des multinationales, des familles peinent 脿 joindre les deux bouts. Pourtant, certains continuent de profiter d鈥檜n syst猫me qui leur est avantageux et dans lequel ils peuvent s鈥檈nrichir 脿 bas co没t, au m茅pris d鈥檜ne soci茅t茅 plus juste et plus 茅quitable.

Aujourd鈥檋ui, je vous en conjure, prenez la mesure de la crise que nous traversons. Prenez la mesure de la volont茅 de justice que nos citoyens revendiquent et celle du vent de col猫re qui nous reviendra en pleine figure si nous ne sommes pas capables d鈥檌mposer aux 1听% ce que font d茅j脿 les 99听%.

听听Pirkko Ruohonen-Lerner (ECR). 鈥� Arvoisa puhemies, Pandoran papereista ja muista paljastuksista saadut kokemukset on t盲rke盲盲 k盲yd盲 huolella l盲pi, jotta tulevaisuudessa osataan keskitty盲 parhaiten vaikuttaviin ja tehokkaisiin menetelmiin veronkierron vastaisessa taistelussa.

Kun maailman rikkaimmat tahot eiv盲t halua maksaa veroja, l枚yt盲v盲t ne helposti asiantuntijoita, jotka auttavat verov盲lttelyss盲. Nelj盲 suurta tilintarkastusyhti枚t盲 hallitsee veroneuvontamarkkinoista l盲hes 90 prosenttia. Yleisen edun kannalta on olennaista, ett盲 n盲iden yritysten asiantuntijoita ei k盲ytet盲 julkisen sektorin konsultteina silloin, kun luodaan uutta veros盲盲ntely盲.

Py枚r枚ovi-ilmi枚ss盲 siirryt盲盲n usein julkiselta sektorilta yksityiselle sektorille. Esimerkiksi OECD:n entinen verojohtaja ja entisi盲 komissaareja on siirtynyt yksityisen sektorin rahakkaisiin teht盲viin. En lainkaan usko, ett盲 eripituiset palkalliset karenssiajat est盲v盲t julkista etua edustavan tiedon valumista yrityksille.

Veronkierto siirt盲盲 verotaakkaa suurilta yrityksilt盲 pienille yrityksille ja henkil枚verotuksen puolelle. Veronkiertoon liittyy suurta ep盲oikeudenmukaisuutta, mink盲 takia kansalaisten luottamus yhteiskunnan oikeudenmukaisuuteen horjuu.

Veronkiertoa voisi tehokkaasti ehk盲ist盲 j盲senvaltioissa, jos korkoja, rojalteja ja palvelumaksuja m盲盲r盲tt盲isiin verotuksessa kokonaan tai osittain v盲hennyskelvottomiksi. My枚s l盲hdeverotuksen laajentaminen olisi tehokas tapa ker盲t盲 nykyist盲 enemm盲n verotuloja.

听听Gunnar Beck (ID). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, Herr Kommissar! Die Pandora Papers sind durchgesickerte Dokumente, die geheime Offshore-Konten von 35 f眉hrenden Politikern offenlegen听鈭� Pr盲sidenten, Premierministern und Monarchen听鈭� sowie gewaltige Offshore-Verm枚gen von mehr als 100 Milliard盲ren, Prominenten und Wirtschaftsf眉hrern.

Das EU-Parlament nimmt jetzt, zwei Jahre nach Ver枚ffentlichung, erstmals Stellung dazu. Dem d盲nischen Berichterstatter, meinem fairen Kollegen Niels Fuglsang, geb眉hrt Dank, aus dem Bericht vielerlei Unsinn herausgehalten, aber auch wichtige M盲ngel im europ盲ischen Steuerrecht betont zu haben.

Einige heikle Themen aber durfte er wohl nicht ansprechen: Denn die Europ盲ische Volkspartei und die Renew-Fraktion verweigerten, in den Pandora Papers erw盲hnte EU-Kommissare und europ盲ische Politiker 枚ffentlich zu r眉gen. Gleiches gilt f眉r Mitgliedstaaten mit gro脽en Defiziten bei Steuer- und Anti-Geldw盲schegesetzgebung wie Portugal, Griechenland, Kroatien, Malta, Zypern und Italien.

Noch bemerkenswerter aber ist der Fall eines besonderen EU-Lieblings, des ukrainischen Pr盲sidenten Selenskyj, der in der Karibik und Zypern ein Spinnennetz von Offshore-Firmen angelegt hat. Dort bunkert er mindestens 41听Millionen听Dollar, die er vom Oligarchen Ihor Kolomojskyj erhalten hat, zusammen mit EU-Hilfsgeldern, die er vor den Beh枚rden in Sicherheit gebracht hat. Bis heute zahlt die in den Virgin Islands registrierte Maltex Multicapital Corporation unversteuerte Dividenden an Olena Selenska, Selenskyjs Ehefrau.

Der franz枚sische Moralist La Rochefoucauld sagte: 鈥�L鈥檋ypocrisie est l鈥檋ommage que le vice rend 脿 la vertu鈥溙�鈭� 鈥濰euchelei ist der Tribut, den das Laster der Tugend zollen muss鈥�. Dieses zeitlose Wort gilt insbesondere f眉r die EU und ihren angeblichen Kampf f眉r Steuergerechtigkeit.

听听Manon Aubry (The Left). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, les Pandora Papers, c鈥櫭﹖ait il y a presque deux ans. Une 茅ternit茅, vous allez me dire, au rythme o霉 se succ猫dent les scandales d鈥櫭﹙asion fiscale. Mais quand m锚me, 11听300听milliards de dollars dissimul茅s. Et apr猫s, on va nous dire au passage que les caisses sont vides et qu鈥檕n va faire les poches des citoyens?

Et puis, ce n鈥檈st pas n鈥檌mporte qui d鈥檌mpliqu茅: 35听chefs d鈥櫭塼at, anciens ou actuels, et 300听responsables publics, dont certains encore en poste, comme Sylvain听Maillard, le vice-pr茅sident du groupe macroniste 脿 l鈥橝ssembl茅e nationale en France, ou le vice-Premier ministre n茅erlandais. Dans un monde normal, ils auraient d没 voir la police d茅barquer chez eux, leurs avoirs saisis et les condamnations pleuvoir. Mais non, rien. Sous l鈥檌nfluence de la droite, ils ne sont m锚me pas cit茅s dans le rapport dont on d茅bat aujourd鈥檋ui. Pas 茅tonnant que l鈥櫭﹙asion fiscale tarde autant 脿 锚tre r茅prim茅e et les paradis fiscaux sanctionn茅s. Dans ces conditions, les fraudeurs, apr猫s tout, ne vont pas mordre la main qui les nourrit.

Bref, deux ans apr猫s, chers coll猫gues, on a quand m锚me un peu le sentiment que la chanson Je n鈥檃i pas chang茅, de Julio Iglesias 鈥撎齦ui aussi impliqu茅 dans les Pandora Papers听鈥�, est devenue le refrain de l鈥橴nion europ茅enne. Alors, je vous propose un autre morceau, une autre musique pour le remplacer: taxer les riches. Et on pourrait bien commencer par un imp么t sur la fortune des milliardaires.

听听Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI). 鈥� Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, signor Commissario, a distanza di due anni dalle scioccanti rivelazioni del Consorzio internazionale dei giornalisti investigativi, che hanno implicato uomini politici, uomini d'affari, personaggi pubblici, sinceramente fin troppo poco 猫 stato fatto. Ma noi non dobbiamo smettere di lottare affinch茅 scandali di questa portata non accadano nuovamente. Ne va soprattutto della tenuta della nostra democrazia, vista la costante erosione della fiducia dei cittadini verso lo Stato di diritto, e del nostro sistema economico.

Domani voteremo in favore della relazione, in quanto 猫 stato fatto davvero un ottimo lavoro dal relatore e lo ringrazio. Tuttavia, ahim猫, senza impegni pi霉 vincolanti per i nostri Stati membri rischiamo che questi buoni propositi diventino semplicemente delle parole al vento. La difesa degli informatori dei giornalisti 猫 una questione di vitale importanza, cui si contribuirebbe anche attraverso l'istituzione di un fondo per il giornalismo d'inchiesta, come ipotizzato nella relazione stessa.

L'evasione e l'elusione fiscale, compresa la pratica dei regimi preferenziali messa in campo da alcuni Stati membri, che possiamo definire quindi complici, che non fanno altro che sottrarre risorse necessarie agli altri Stati, sono invece patologie da debellare a qualunque costo. Lo dobbiamo ai nostri cittadini, lo dobbiamo agli onesti contribuenti, lo dobbiamo agli ultimi che puntualmente diventano i primi quando si tratta di compiere sacrifici, specialmente economici.

听听Frances Fitzgerald (PPE). 鈥� Madam President, citizens across the world were appalled at the revelations contained in the Pandora Papers and similar exposures, I remember it all too well.

Structures across the world that have the purpose of facilitating illegal practices, such as tax evasion and money laundering, undermine confidence in the benefits of a globally interconnected financial system for raising living standards globally, particularly in developing countries. They also undermine trust in our societies and in our democracies. It is vital that this confidence be restored. This is why we must redouble our efforts internationally.

The key word here, I believe, is transparency. Free and fair tax competition is important, but it is crucial that the countries with which we do business are clear and transparent about all their tax structures and corporate rules. As a union, we must be serious about having an effective EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes with appropriate recourses to action if needed. We need ongoing global cooperation with all our partner countries.

We already have vital structures for tax compliance, such as the automatic exchange of information, the OECD Common Reporting Standards, the OECD鈥檚 Joint International Taskforce on Shared Intelligence and Collaboration Network, in which 19 EU Member States currently participate.

I believe that we should build on this to achieve greater and more efficient international exchange of information between fiscal authorities to tackle financial crime. And I would say that our democracies depend on it.

听听Paul Tang (S&D). 鈥� Voorzitter, over de doden niets dan goeds. Silvio Berlusconi heeft veel gedaan om belastingontwijking te agenderen. Corruptie, valsheid in geschrifte, witwassen en belastingfraude zijn maar een paar gedragingen die hij uitstekend onder de aandacht wist te brengen. Hij kan daarmee op een indrukwekkende lijst van royals, bekendheden en criminelen uit de Pandora Papers worden geplaatst.

De Pandora Papers waren de grootste in een reeks onthullingen die een internationaal web van belastingconstructies lieten zien met als doel het bezit van de allerrijksten te verbergen en daarmee belasting te ontwijken.

Terwijl de bakker op de hoek bakken geld kwijt is aan energiekosten, liggen de allerrijksten ter wereld te bakken in de zon.

De Pandora Papers waren de grootste onthulling in de geschiedenis op het gebied van belasting, maar hadden geen consequenties. Commissievoorzitter听Von听der听Leyen en premier听Rutte reizen met miljarden af naar Tunesi毛 om vluchtelingen te stoppen, maar doen niets aan de miljarden die vluchten naar belastingparadijzen. Hoe kunnen we dit accepteren?

De woede van de mensen vindt duidelijk geen weerklank bij de lidstaten. Brievenbusfirma鈥檚 vormen een groot onderdeel van het probleem, maar een wet om hun rol in te perken wordt geblokkeerd. Voorts stuit het voorstel om louche belastingadviseurs aan te pakken nog voordat het gepubliceerd is op verzet. Tegelijkertijd houden EU-landen belastingparadijzen nog steeds de hand boven het hoofd. We moeten de achterkamertjes waar commissaris Gentiloni鈥檚 initiatieven sneuvelen, openbreken. Als landen niet bereid zijn belastingontwijking aan te pakken, moeten we dit hardop en publiekelijk zeggen.

Het verslag van Niels Fuglsang biedt oplossingen door de rijksten te belasten, ongelijkheid recht te trekken en rechtvaardigheid te herstellen. Kortom, het ontbreekt niet aan oplossingen om een eind te maken aan belastingontwijking, maar simpelweg aan de politieke wil om deze kwestie samen op te lossen.

Vandaag is de begrafenis van Silvio Berlusconi. Laat het ook de begrafenis van belastingontwijking zijn.

听听螝蠅谓蟽蟿伪谓蟿委谓慰蟼 螒蟻尾伪谓委蟿畏蟼 (The Left). 鈥� 螝蠀蟻委伪 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 渭喂伪 渭喂魏蟻萎 蠀蟺苇蟻尾伪蟽畏, 蟽萎渭蔚蟻伪 蔚委谓伪喂 渭喂伪 蟺慰位蠉 未蠉蟽魏慰位畏 渭苇蟻伪 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏 魏伪喂 纬喂伪 蟿畏 蠂蠋蟻伪 渭慰蠀. 螘魏蟿蠈蟼 胃苇渭伪蟿慰蟼, 苇蠂慰蠀渭蔚 未蔚魏维未蔚蟼 谓蔚魏蟻慰蠉蟼 蔚魏蔚委 苇尉蠅, 蟽蟿伪 蔚位位畏谓喂魏维 魏伪喂 蟽蟿伪 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏维 谓蔚蟻维. 螤蟻蠈魏蔚喂蟿伪喂 纬喂伪 渭蔚蟿伪谓维蟽蟿蔚蟼.

螘蟺喂蟽蟿蟻苇蠁蠅 蟽蟿慰 胃苇渭伪 渭伪蟼. 螒蟺蠈 蟿畏 位委蟽蟿伪 螞伪纬魏维蟻谓蟿, 蟽蟿伪 Panama Papers, 蟽蟿伪 Paradise Papers, 蟿蠋蟻伪 蟽蟿伪 Pandora papers, 蟽蟿慰谓 蔚尉伪喂蟻蔚蟿喂魏蠈 蟻蠈位慰 蟿畏蟼 蔚蟻蔚蠀谓畏蟿喂魏萎蟼 未畏渭慰蟽喂慰纬蟻伪蠁委伪蟼 魏伪喂 蟽蟿慰谓 蔚谓慰蠂喂魏蠈 魏伪喂 蟽蠀纬魏伪蟿伪尾伪蟿喂魏蠈 蟻蠈位慰 蟿慰蠀 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏慰蠉 蠀蟺慰魏蔚喂渭苇谓慰蠀. 螠喂位维渭蔚 纬喂伪 蟿慰蠀位维蠂喂蟽蟿慰谓 2,3 蟿蟻喂蟽蔚魏伪蟿慰渭渭蠉蟻喂伪 蔚蠀蟻蠋 蔚谓蠅蟽喂伪魏蠋谓 魏蔚蠁伪位伪委蠅谓 蟺慰蠀 魏伪蟿伪位萎纬慰蠀谓 蟽蔚 蠁慰蟻慰位慰纬喂魏慰蠉蟼 蟺伪蟻伪未蔚委蟽慰蠀蟼. 螖畏位伪未萎 伪蠁蔚谓蠈蟼 慰喂 蟺慰位委蟿蔚蟼 萎 慰喂 伪蟺位慰委 维谓胃蟻蠅蟺慰喂 谓伪 蠁慰蟻慰位慰纬慰蠉谓蟿伪喂 魏伪喂 谓伪 蔚位苇纬蠂慰谓蟿伪喂 - 伪蠁蔚蟿苇蟻慰蠀 畏 蔚蟺喂蠂蔚喂蟻畏渭伪蟿喂魏萎 魏伪喂 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏萎 蔚位委蟿 魏伪喂 蟿慰 未喂蔚胃谓苇蟼 慰蟻纬伪谓蠅渭苇谓慰 苇纬魏位畏渭伪 谓伪 蟺慰位位伪蟺位伪蟽喂维味慰蠀谓 蟿伪 魏蔚蠁维位伪喂维 蟿慰蠀蟼 魏伪喂 慰喂 未畏渭慰蟽喂慰纬蟻维蠁慰喂 谓伪 魏伪蟿伪未喂蠋魏慰谓蟿伪喂.

螘委谓伪喂 伪蟺伪蟻维未蔚魏蟿慰 畏 螆谓蠅蟽畏 谓伪 伪谓苇蠂蔚蟿伪喂 伪蠀蟿苇蟼 蟿喂蟼 蠉蟺慰蟺蟿蔚蟼 未蠅蟻蔚苇蟼 魏蔚蠁伪位伪委慰蠀. 螒蟼 渭喂位萎蟽慰蠀渭蔚 魏伪胃伪蟻维. 螔位苇蟺慰蠀渭蔚 蟿畏 螖蔚尉喂维 魏伪喂 蟿慰 螞伪蠆魏蠈 螝蠈渭渭伪 谓伪 伪蟻谓慰蠉谓蟿伪喂 蟿畏 未畏渭慰蟽喂慰蟺慰委畏蟽畏 蟽蟿慰喂蠂蔚委蠅谓 魏伪喂 谓伪 蔚蟺喂渭苇谓慰蠀谓 谓伪 渭畏谓 魏伪蟿慰谓慰渭伪蟽蟿慰蠉谓 蟿伪 魏蟻维蟿畏 渭苇位畏 蟺慰蠀 蟺蟻喂渭慰未慰蟿慰蠉谓 蟿苇蟿慰喂蔚蟼 蟺蟻伪魏蟿喂魏苇蟼. 螣蠉蟿蔚 伪魏慰蠉渭蔚 魏蟻喂蟿喂魏萎 纬喂伪 蟿慰 伪谓蔚蟺伪蟻魏苇蟼 15听% 蟿慰蠀 蔚位维蠂喂蟽蟿慰蠀 蟽蠀谓蟿蔚位蔚蟽蟿萎 蠁慰蟻慰位蠈纬畏蟽畏蟼 蔚蟿伪喂蟻蔚喂蠋谓. 螘未蠋 位慰喂蟺蠈谓, 蔚谓蠋蟺喂慰蟼 蔚谓蠅蟺委蠅, 蠈位蔚蟼 慰喂 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏苇蟼 慰渭维未蔚蟼 谓伪 蟺维蟻慰蠀谓 胃苇蟽畏. 螢蔚魏维胃伪蟻畏 胃苇蟽畏.

听听Antoni Com铆n i Oliveres (NI). 鈥� Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, si stima che i paradisi fiscali facciano perdere ai governi del mondo quasi 500 miliardi di dollari all'anno. S矛, un cinque e undici zeri. I Pandora Papers ci ricordano che l'evasione fiscale 猫 uno dei problemi pi霉 importanti che il mondo debba oggi affrontare. Mina le basi fiscali del Welfare State nei paesi del Nord e le risorse che si perdono a causa dell'evasione fiscale permetterebbero l'eradicamento abbastanza immediato della povert脿 estrema nei paesi del Sud globale.

Nell'Unione europea dobbiamo essere molto pi霉 energici nella lotta contro i paradisi fiscali. Primo: dobbiamo aggiornare la nostra lista nera di giurisdizioni fiscali non cooperative perch茅 ci siano i dodici paesi in cui l'imposta sulle societ脿 e dello 0听%, oggi non c'猫 nessuno, e perch茅 ci siano anche paesi che non hanno criteri di trasparenza per quanto riguarda la propriet脿 delle societ脿 registrate.

Secondo: nella lista di monitoraggio dovrebbero esserci pure i paesi con un'imposta sulle societ脿 inferiore al 15听% stabilito dall'accordo OCSE. Inoltre, 猫 urgente accelerare la creazione dell'Autorit脿 europea antiriciclaggio. L'evasione fiscale 猫 un attacco contro ogni idea di giustizia su scala globale. Per questo motivo la lotta contro i paradisi fiscali dovrebbe essere una priorit脿 assoluta nella nostra agenda politica.

听听Stanislav Pol膷谩k (PPE). 鈥� Pan铆 p艡edsedaj铆c铆, v谩啪en媒 pane komisa艡i, co n谩m odkryla kauza Pandora Papers? Tajn茅 煤膷ty kr谩l暖, premi茅r暖, miliard谩艡暖, zapojen媒ch privilegovan媒ch lid铆. N臎co bylo leg谩ln铆, n臎co u啪 mo啪n谩 na hranici legality a n臎co bylo zjevn臎 neleg谩ln铆. Vytv谩艡ely se slo啪it茅 struktury, vyu啪铆valy se offshore spole膷nosti a samoz艡ejm臎 c铆lem bylo bu膹 optimalizovat dan臎, nebo dokonce p谩chat da艌ov茅 煤niky. Mezin谩rodn铆 spolupr谩ce v da艌ov媒ch v臎cech je tak zcela zjevn臎 nad谩le prioritou a mus铆 b媒t prioritou i pro mezin谩rodn铆 spole膷enstv铆 jako takov茅. Proto啪e ten, kdo na da艌ov茅m 煤niku p艡edev拧铆m trat铆, tak je st谩t. A 艡ekl bych, 啪e da艌ov媒 煤nik je nejhor拧铆 pravicov媒 zlo膷in proti st谩tu jako takov茅mu. Mysl铆m si, 啪e mus铆me budovat d谩le spole膷n媒 postup na拧ich st谩t暖 v da艌ov媒ch v臎cech. Trochu m臎 mrz铆, 啪e pr谩v臎 dnes zde nen铆 zastoupena Rada, proto啪e po dvou letech od odhalen铆 kauzy Pandora Papers bychom m臎li ji啪 o膷ek谩vat i aktivitu Rady v t茅to v臎ci. A je d暖le啪it茅, abychom tak茅 zaplnili mezery v na拧em vlastn铆m pr谩vu, v pr谩vu EU. Byl jsem v啪dy proti tomu, abychom omezovali da艌ovou autonomii 膷lensk媒ch st谩t暖, ale je jednozna膷n茅, 啪e mus铆me sjednotit administrativn铆 postupy pr谩v臎 v da艌ov媒ch v臎cech, a to s c铆lem pr谩v臎 zamezen铆 t臎mto da艌ov媒m 煤nik暖m, a mus铆me tento tlak vyvinout i na mezin谩rodn铆 煤rovni.

听听Marek Belka (S&D). 鈥� Madam President, when many Member States are struggling to make ends meet to support Ukrainian refugees or fight climate change, according to recent data, in 2015, more than USD听200听billion were shifted from the EU to tax havens. I鈥檓 sick of underlining this. This is a warning call for us. Before the Pandora Papers, we already had LuxLeaks, Paradise Papers, Panama Papers and many more. Is that not enough? We have to act.

First, we need better sanctions against the tax havens that are on the EU blacklist. Just naming and shaming won鈥檛 do the job: there鈥檚 too much money involved. Second, it is high time to cooperate with the US on the two pillars of OECD reform. Otherwise, we鈥檒l be stuck in between giving tax havens a space to flourish. Third, 合法博彩网站 has to have a say on tax issues. Stalling tax reforms with the unanimity principle is a joke, with all the tax leaks popping up virtually every year.

Colleagues. Elton John 鈥� another celebrity after Silvio Berlusconi mentioned here 鈥� who is amongst many of the tax-avoiding politicians and celebrities revealed by the journalists in the Pandora Papers, might still be standing. But I hope that the unfair system of tax havens soon won鈥檛.

听听Malin Bj枚rk (The Left). 鈥� Fru talman! H枚gerregeringarna i Europa forts盲tter att utforma skatteregler som 盲r direkt anpassade f枚r de rika. I mitt land, Sverige, s盲nks skatten f枚r dem som tj盲nar mest, medan skola, v氓rd, omsorg dras ner p氓. I Sverige har vi avskaffat f枚rm枚genhetsskatten, fastighetsskatten och vi subventionerar rika hush氓ll med hush氓llstj盲nster.

Konsten att slakta ett v盲lf盲rdssamh盲lle skulle vi kunna kalla h枚gerns or盲ttvisa skattepolitik. Som om detta inte r盲ckte har vi dessutom i Europa regelverk som underl盲ttar ett utbrett skattefiffel. N氓got som 氓terigen bara gynnar de rikaste och storf枚retagen och allsk枚ns fifflare.

Bara genom l盲ckor som Pandoradokumenten kan vi f氓 en bild av det h盲r samh盲llsfientliga fiffleriet. Vi m氓ste se till att f氓 ett r盲ttvisare skattesystem, och vi m氓ste 枚ka transparensen och sk盲rpa regelverket s氓 att vi kan s盲tta stopp f枚r skattefiffleriet 鈥� b氓de f枚r f枚retag och f枚r privatpersoner. Vi beh枚ver skatter盲ttvisa nu.

听听Marcel de Graaff (NI). 鈥� Voorzitter, de Pandora Papers zijn een eindeloze reeks van belastingontwijking door vermogende personen en bedrijven in belastingparadijzen.

De huidige torenhoge belastingen zijn diefstal door de overheid om de armen arm te houden en de rijken rijker te maken. De rijken omzeilen belastingen vervolgens ook nog eens via ondoorzichtige constructies.

De overheid wil contant geld voor de gewone man uitbannen, maar laat de miljoenen op onvindbare bankrekeningen ongemoeid. Dit is bevestigd in de Pandora Papers. De overheid wordt geleid door een vriendjesnetwerk van graaiers die zichzelf verrijken, zoals Ursula听von听der听Leyen, die de deal met Pfizer nog altijd niet heeft bekendgemaakt.

De oplossing is niet een verbod op contant geld en streng toezicht op de gewone man, maar een kleine, controleerbare overheid en een lage, eerlijke en simpele belasting voor iedereen. Op deze manier zijn belastingontwijkende constructies niet mogelijk en bovendien niet nodig.

听听Juan Fernando L贸pez Aguilar (S&D). 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, se帽or comisario Reynders, est谩 usted echando muchas horas en este pleno del Parlamento Europeo. M谩s horas echamos a煤n los que fuimos miembros de la Comisi贸n de Investigaci贸n sobre los Papeles de Pandora, que arroj贸 algunas lecciones conclusivas, algunas de las cuales voy a subrayar.

La primera es la necesidad de transparencia y, por tanto, de evitar que se produzcan conflictos de intereses y que, bajo la r煤brica de empresas de contabilidad financiera, se escondan verdaderos chiringuitos de evasi贸n de capitales.

La segunda es la necesidad de acabar con las pr谩cticas predatorias de fiscalidad competitiva entre los Estados miembros de la Uni贸n Europea, particularmente en el 谩mbito de la fiscalidad del patrimonio y de sociedades. Esto incluye tambi茅n poner fin a los programas de residencia para inversores y a los programas de ciudadan铆a para inversores, como tantas veces hemos requerido en este Parlamento Europeo.

Y la tercera es la necesidad de combatir los para铆sos fiscales. La 煤nica forma de que la Uni贸n Europea sea relevante en ese combate es que lo haga de forma unida, consistente, persistente en el tiempo y en todas las organizaciones de la gobernanza de la globalizaci贸n, con el fin de acabar con esa pr谩ctica sencillamente inaceptable que tanto se manifest贸 durante nuestra investigaci贸n de los Papeles de Pandora.

听听Marc Botenga (The Left). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Monsieur le Commissaire, planquer son fric sur une 卯le paradisiaque, soyons clairs: c鈥檈st du vol. C鈥檈st du vol 脿 la collectivit茅, ce que font ces milliardaires et ces millionnaires. Ils 茅vitent que cet argent soit utilis茅 pour finalement investir dans des cr猫ches. Ce sont eux qui sont responsables, si l鈥檕n n鈥檃 pas assez de cr猫ches; ce sont eux qui sont responsables, si le matin vous attendez le bus, mais que vous ne le voyez pas arriver, quand vous voyez 芦5听minutes禄, puis 芦4听minutes禄, 芦3听minutes禄 et le bus dispara卯t; ce sont eux qui sont responsables, lorsque les trains sont en retard; eux toujours qui sont responsables, quand il n鈥檡 a pas assez de m茅decins et d鈥檌nfirmiers dans nos h么pitaux.

Comment se fait-il qu鈥檌ls ne finissent pas en taule? Parce que, 茅videmment, il y a des politiciens qui sont 脿 leur service, parce que nous avons des lois qui ont 茅t茅 茅crites sur mesure pour les riches, pour les millionnaires. Aujourd鈥檋ui, tout le monde vient pleurer: 芦Ah, ils 茅vitent l鈥檌mp么t! Ils payent pas l鈥檌mp么t, les riches, les multimilliardaires!禄 Eh bien, prenons les mesures qui s鈥檌mposent! Levons le secret bancaire, imposons une taxe pour les millionnaires 鈥撎齣l y a toujours une majorit茅, ici, pour voter contre听鈥� et arr锚tons les transactions 茅conomiques avec les paradis fiscaux, parce que, sinon, c鈥檈st de l鈥檋ypocrisie avec des larmes de crocodile.

Spontane Wortmeldungen

听听Mick Wallace (The Left). 鈥� Madam President, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists should be commended for their work on the Pandora Papers. On their website on the Papers, the ICIJ lists who they consider the power players of the Pandora Papers. They include, unsurprisingly, President Putin and his inner circle, but they also include the current Ukrainian President, Zelenskyy. The ICIJ describes Zelenskyy鈥檚 activities as follows: 鈥榋elenskyy owned shares in an anonymous offshore entity, as did some of his business partners who are now close political allies.鈥�

The report recommends that investigations into the assets and investments of Russian oligarchs should be a top priority, as they are strategically important for the EU鈥檚 security. Maybe the report should also consider investigations into the powers that be in Ukraine in order to ascertain how they attained their vast wealth and power.

(Ende der spontanen Wortmeldungen)

听听Didier Reynders, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, honourable Members, I know that this 合法博彩网站 is committed to increasing tax transparency and fairness and to the fight against tax avoidance, tax evasion and aggressive tax planning.

This report proves this once again. The Commission is working to deliver on this. We must not lose time. The proposals currently discussed must be agreed swiftly, and the upcoming proposals must advance fast. That way, we will have a robust arsenal to fight against tax evasion avoidance and aggressive tax planning.

The Commission knows it can count on you and your help and support for this. This is of crucial importance. EU citizens are placing their expectations on us. Thank you once again for our discussions today, for your support and let us stay united on this issue to make some progress on the different files that we have in discussion for the moment.

听听Niels Fuglsang, rapporteur. 鈥� Madam President, Commissioner, colleagues, thank you. I think we had a fruitful debate today. I think it shows that, of course, we have ideological differences in this House. We are from the left to the right, and we might disagree on how the tax levels should be. Should the tax be higher or lower? We disagree, probably. But I think it also shows the debate today that we agree that no matter what the decision will be on how the tax level should be, we must agree that it should be the same rules for everybody. The tax rules that democracy decides should apply to everybody. And as it has been said from this floor today, that鈥檚 not the case today.

We have seen in the Pandora Papers that we have two systems. We have two sets of rules, one for the 99 % of those who go to work and pay their taxes, and one for the top 1 % who are able to use offshore accounts, hire tax advisers, hire lawyers that help them create shell companies and fake trusts so that they can avoid paying their taxes. And that is basically what we need to do away with. As Udo Bullmann, the DEVE rapporteur, said, this is something which harms, in particular, the developing countries, those who are poorest, those who have less than the rest, they are not the ones who are benefiting. They鈥檙e the ones who are being harmed. And those on the top are the ones who are benefiting.

So why are we not doing more? Mr Botenga asked. We cannot just complain. We need to act. I think he is absolutely right. And I think in this report we have a number of proposals. We have discussed them here today. So let us just agree that we have talked sufficiently. Now it is time to act and to do away with these tax schemes.

听听Die Pr盲sidentin. 鈥� Die Aussprache ist geschlossen.

Die Abstimmung findet am Donnerstag, 15.听Juni 2023, statt.

Schriftliche Erkl盲rungen (Artikel 171)

听听Alfred Sant (S&D), in writing. 鈥� The Report on lessons learnt from the Pandora Papers refers back to the large-scale leak of financial documents of October 2021, revealing offshore assets and financial transactions of numerous individuals and entities worldwide. I am in favour of this report, which aims to follow up on the recommendations made in the past regarding how to control illicit state and corporate practices that enable firms and wealthy or well-connected individuals to abusively amass wealth and avoid paying taxes. Nevertheless, I strongly disagree with the bias in the report that considers tax competition as an inherently bad thing.

Tax competition measures are an essential tool for some Member States to compensate for a lack of endowments and/or economic handicaps that place them at a competitive disadvantage. Secondly, I disagree strongly as well with the report鈥檚 reference to so-called golden passports as 鈥榦bjectionable from an ethical, legal and economic point of view鈥�. While myself having reservations about their use, this is not on the grounds mentioned. Such measures are totally legitimate and have been applied 鈥� still are 鈥� by countries, including major EU Member States and the US under one guise or another. It was only when smaller states also adopted the practice that objections began to be raised.