合法博彩网站

听听Die Pr盲sidentin. 鈥� Als n盲chster Punkt der Tagesordnung folgt die Aussprache 眉ber die Erkl盲rung der Kommission zum Paket 鈥灻杒ologisierung des Verkehrs鈥� ().

听听Jutta Urpilainen, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, honourable Members, I am taking this floor on behalf of Commissioner V膬lean, who is in the press room at the moment. So freight transport is the backbone of our single market and our trade with the rest of the world. Rate volumes are projected to rise by 50 % by 2050. This stands as testimony to the health and competitiveness of our economy. At the same time, rate also accounts for 30 % of transport Co2 emissions. Reducing these is vital to delivering on our European Green Deal objectives. But we must do this while allowing our single market to grow. In response to these challenges and opportunities, today, a couple hours ago, the College adopted the Greening Freight Package, which aims to help the sector to decarbonise, further harmonise our rules in the single market and better structure allocation of rail-freight capacity across borders. Concretely, the Greening Freight Package comprises a regulation creating a harmonised framework for Co2 emissions (CountEmissions EU), the revision of the Weights and Dimensions Directive, a regulation on improving the use of railway infrastructure, the revision of the Combined Transport Directive, which is planned for adoption later this month.

To provide an overview of the package, we have a communication explaining the rationale behind it and how the proposals fit in with the bigger picture. It also highlights the people behind freight-transport services setting the scene for addressing worker shortages, improving their working environment and tackling an ageing workforce.

So let me now turn to the three legislative initiatives on the table today. CountEmissions EU: This proposal establishes a single methodology to calculate transport service emissions. It will be based on a global ISO standard recently adopted. Already today we see transport operators informing their customers of the impact of the Co2 emissions of their trips. However, we don鈥檛 know how this impact has been calculated, and this is what we tackle with this proposal, ensuring businesses and consumers get reliable and comparable data when being informed about their carbon footprint for passenger services, but also for freight. There is notably no obligation on economic operators to provide their carbon footprint. And we have paid particular attention not to burden the sector, in particular SMEs.

The second proposal and initiative is the Weights and Dimensions Directive. The shift to clean trucks in particular, zero-emission vehicles will take time. Naturally, we need additional incentives to make them more attractive and increase their uptake. Our proposal intends to do this by allowing an additional weight of four tonnes for zero-emission vehicles to accommodate the weight of batteries without losing loading capacity. This is critical for a sector where most hauliers are SMEs and make a very careful cost-benefit analysis of every euro spent on fleet renewable. We remain technologically neutral. Should the market opt for hydrogen based solutions, we propose technical adjustments to host tanks behind the cabin without losing load capacity. Moreover, we are finally putting an end to today鈥檚 patchwork of national rules and bilateral agreements for high capacity vehicles which were at odds with the single market. We are not pushing anyone to embrace longer and/or heavier trucks where this is not accepted today. We are simply ending the situation in which more efficient trucks currently allowed in two or more neighbouring Member States cannot cross the borders between these. Standard 44 tonne trucks currently allowed in national traffic in 12 Member States will also be able to travel cross borders between allowing Member States, for example, a truck will be able to travel from the Netherlands to France, while until now their journey needed to end in Belgium.

Finally, we make life easier for road operators and important industries such as renewables and tech companies, which today face a platform of national requirements and procedures when transporting, for example, a piece of a wind turbine across borders.

Our third initiative is rail capacity regulation. Rail is one of the cleanest ways to transport freight, but current rules on capacity allocation are ineffective and particularly unfavourable to cross-border and freight services. And unfortunately, this makes rail unattractive for many logistics companies. Better management of capacity will help address this. So more concretely, our proposal will incentivise infrastructure managers to act in a more flexible way for both long-term strategic planning and short-term capacity allocation. With optimised use of the network, we will be bringing additional capacity and creating space for additional services. Railway undertakings will be able to request capacity at any time based on market needs instead of having the file requests within rigid timelines. We are also discouraging some practices by which companies reserve capacity just in case and do not use it. Equally, infrastructure managers will have to plan works on the network well in advance and take measures to reduce their impact on operations.

Let me conclude, honourable Members. The European freight sector is at a turning point. With increasing demand, it must become less polluting and more resilient while continuing to thrive in tomorrow鈥檚 globalised economy.

听听Barbara Thaler, on behalf of the PPE Group. 鈥� Madam President, Commissioner, dear colleagues, let us be frank, shall we? Road transport is working because we have a working internal market for road transport. It is as simple as that. And looking at the changes the Commission just made to the Weights and Dimensions Directive, road transport will be even more attractive in the future. Good for road, bad for the others.

In the new proposal, the Commission gives Member States more possibilities to increase the productivity of road transport by 50%, from 40 to 60 tonnes. A similar jump in productivity for rail would correspond to 1听110-metre trains. Road transport is closely linked to our single market, but rail is more or less loosely attached to kind of a principle and abstract concept of the internal market.

Which brings me to the rail capacity proposal. Instead of a single European railway area, we have 25听railway islands. By sheer luck, you will find two or more countries which have the same operational rules, technical standards and infrastructure. And instead of addressing the big white elephant in the room, we have again the proposal on the table, which is tailor-made to please 25听Member States at the cost of the whole sector, at the cost of our whole economy and environment. But again, we leave railway companies at the mercy of 25听national infrastructure managers. Kindly asking them to think more European will not do the trick. But I am confident that we 鈥� that 合法博彩网站 鈥� will amend this proposal accordingly.

And lastly, on your proposal on counting emissions: a harmonised standard for counting emissions is nice, but as long as the majority in this House pretends that electricity from coal is zero emission, so long it is without any added value for the climate. However, the EPP is ready to improve the package and close the first reading in this mandate.

听听Bogus艂aw Liberadzki, on behalf of the S&D Group. 鈥� Madam President, Madam Commissioner, my warm greetings to Commissioner V膬lean. It is a little bit of a pity that she鈥檚 not present.

The Greening Transport Package is something that鈥檚 been quite expected, and we do not expect the big discovery of the wheel again, but we expect a kind of putting in order of what we have as crucial issues. And these items, they are correct. As Socialists and Democrats, we will accept it.

For CO2 emissions, as my predecessor said, it is important to know the source, even for green or electric energy, and to unify the ways in which we calculate emissions.

This is of course of crucial importance for vehicles, there is another aspect, but it is not only a matter of heavy vehicles of 44听tonnes: it would be a matter for all categories of vehicles in different applications. I welcome very much this increase of 4.25 tons for small vehicles. It is quite justified. It means less vehicles to serve, it means less traffic.

What could be probably crucial is creating infrastructure to increase European railway capacity. This is indeed something that we are dealing with in very different ways and not exactly efficiently. We would very much welcome it if we could make better use of existing infrastructure, when we can bring railways back on the track of increasing market share and also to overcome the limitations of border鈥攃rossing facilities. What is important in this case is a kind of European approach, having in mind a European railway space.

I am quite sure from what you stated, Madam Commissioner, that you realise that transport keeps Europe moving. Without transport in Europe we stop. Without transport, our social life will be very much deteriorated. We will support, we will do our best in the Socialist Group to process it during this term.

听听Jos茅 Ram贸n Bauz谩 D铆az, en nombre del Grupo Renew. 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, estimada comisaria, hoy tenemos al sector agr铆cola y ganadero en pie de guerra frente al Parlamento por una serie de medidas que est谩 tomando la Comisi贸n Europea.

M谩s all谩 del contenido de las mismas, de si contribuyen o no a la lucha contra el cambio clim谩tico o de si impactan o no en la econom铆a, lo cierto es que hay sectores productivos de la sociedad descontentos con algunas de las propuestas que esta Comisi贸n Europea est谩 presentando.

Esta ser谩 recordada como la legislatura del Pacto Verde. Hemos aprobado el paquete en materia de sostenibilidad m谩s ambicioso de la historia de la Uni贸n Europea y lo hemos hecho en un tiempo r茅cord. Por supuesto, porque las implicaciones que el cambio clim谩tico tiene en nuestro planeta as铆 lo merecen y porque hay que revertirlas.

Pero, aun as铆, perm铆tame que me pregunte si en alg煤n momento durante estos cuatro a帽os no hemos sido demasiado obsesivos. Todav铆a estamos deliberando sobre muchas de las propuestas puestas encima de la mesa hace unos meses y hoy se nos presenta un nuevo paquete de medidas para acelerar la transici贸n en el sector de la carretera.

Se帽ora comisaria, no pongo en absoluto en duda la efectividad de estas medidas, pero perm铆tame decirle que lo que necesita el sector del transporte por carretera no es m谩s normativa, sino m谩s tiempo y m谩s recursos para poder permitirse una transici贸n altamente costosa. Los transportistas desean disponer de flotas de veh铆culos m谩s sostenibles, por supuesto, pero no solamente necesitan solvencia econ贸mica para asumir el elevado precio, sino que tambi茅n requieren puestos de recarga, por ejemplo, para moverse del norte al sur o del este a oeste de la Uni贸n Europea.

Por lo tanto, no nos pongamos a los sectores productivos en contra, como ha ocurrido esta ma帽ana en las puertas de esta C谩mara: mantengamos el di谩logo y promovamos una escucha activa con el sector para ir de la mano en esta transici贸n que nos preocupa y nos ocupa a todos, porque de lo contrario solamente tendremos una cosa asegurada y es que nos ir谩 mal a todos.

听听Karima Delli, au nom du groupe Verts/ALE. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Madame la Commissaire, mes chers coll猫gues, s鈥檌l fallait encore le rappeler, l鈥檜rgence climatique est l脿. Elle nous terrasse toutes et tous, et elle nous terrassera encore plus demain si nous ne faisons rien.

Le transport, c鈥檈st un quart des 茅missions de CO2 dans l鈥橴nion europ茅enne et c鈥檈st le seul secteur qui n鈥檃 pas r茅duit ses 茅missions de gaz 脿 effet de serre depuis听1990. Le constat est donc simple: pour parvenir 脿 nos objectifs climatiques et 脿 la neutralit茅 carbone 脿 l鈥檋orizon de听2050, le fret ferroviaire doit v茅ritablement devenir une priorit茅. Oui, le fret doit se transformer, se verdir, se r茅inventer. Et c鈥檈st dans cette optique que nous devons aller vers une part modale du fret ferroviaire de 30听% d鈥檌ci 脿听2030. Mais nous sommes encore trop loin, en dessous de la barre des 20听%.

Alors, les propositions l茅gislatives aujourd鈥檋ui sont insuffisantes 脿 cet 茅gard. Pour parvenir 脿 cet objectif, il nous faut des l茅gislations claires, des investissements, des fili猫res, parce que derri猫re il y a de l鈥檈mploi, mais aussi une 茅norme volont茅 politique. Nous devons 茅galement prot茅ger le fret ferroviaire existant et la Commission ne doit absolument pas le d茅manteler dans certains 脡tats membres. Nous allons nous pencher sur ces textes d猫s que possible. Je regrette cependant que ces propositions n鈥檃rrivent que maintenant, 脿 moins d鈥檜n an des 茅lections europ茅ennes.

Nous le martelons depuis maintenant des ann茅es, la transition 茅cologique ne peut pas attendre. Elle ne peut plus attendre qui que ce soit, quoi que ce soit. C鈥檈st pour cela que nous vous demandons, et je vous le dis en tant que pr茅sidente de la commission des transports de cet h茅micycle, d鈥檃gir vite, avec force et rapidit茅, parce que nous sommes d茅j脿 en retard.

听听螆位蔚谓伪 螝慰蠀谓蟿慰蠀蟻维, 蔚尉 慰谓蠈渭伪蟿慰蟼 蟿畏蟼 慰渭维未伪蟼 The Left. 鈥� 螝蠀蟻委伪 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 蔚蠀蠂伪蟻喂蟽蟿蠋 蟺慰位蠉, 魏蠀蟻委伪 螘蟺委蟿蟻慰蟺蔚, 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 蟺伪蟻慰蠀蟽委伪蟽萎 蟽伪蟼. 螕喂伪 谓伪 蟺蔚蟿蠉蠂慰蠀渭蔚 蟿慰蠀蟼 魏位喂渭伪蟿喂魏慰蠉蟼 渭伪蟼 蟽蟿蠈蠂慰蠀蟼, 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 伪蠀尉畏胃慰蠉谓 慰喂 蟽喂未畏蟻慰未蟻慰渭喂魏苇蟼 渭蔚蟿伪蠁慰蟻苇蟼 魏伪蟿维 50% 渭苇蠂蟻喂 蟿慰 2030 魏伪喂 谓伪 未喂蟺位伪蟽喂伪蟽蟿慰蠉谓 苇蠅蟼 蟿慰 2050. 螣喂 蟽蟿蠈蠂慰喂 伪蠀蟿慰委 蔚委谓伪喂 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿喂魏维 未蠉蟽魏慰位慰 谓伪 蔚蟺喂蟿蔚蠀蠂胃慰蠉谓, 伪谓 位维尾慰蠀渭蔚 蠀蟺蠈蠄喂谓 蠈蟿喂 畏 螘蟺喂蟿蟻慰蟺萎 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺伪胃蔚委 蔚未蠋 魏伪喂 未蔚魏伪蔚蟿委蔚蟼 谓伪 蟺蔚蟿蠉蠂蔚喂 蟿畏谓 伪蠉尉畏蟽畏 蟿蠅谓 蟽喂未畏蟻慰未蟻慰渭喂魏蠋谓 渭蔚蟿伪蠁慰蟻蠋谓, 蔚谓蠋 蟿伪 蟽蟿慰喂蠂蔚委伪 未蔚委蠂谓慰蠀谓 蠈蟿喂, 伪谓蟿委胃蔚蟿伪 渭蔚 蟿喂蟼 蟺蟻慰胃苇蟽蔚喂蟼, 慰喂 蟽喂未畏蟻慰未蟻慰渭喂魏苇蟼 渭蔚蟿伪蠁慰蟻苇蟼 苇蠂慰蠀谓 蠂维蟽蔚喂 苇未伪蠁慰蟼 伪蟺蠈 蟿喂蟼 慰未喂魏苇蟼 渭蔚蟿伪蠁慰蟻苇蟼.

螠蔚蟿维 伪蟺蠈 蟿苇蟽蟽蔚蟻伪 谓慰渭慰胃蔚蟿喂魏维 蟺伪魏苇蟿伪, 畏 伪纬慰蟻维 蟿蠅谓 蟽喂未畏蟻慰未蟻蠈渭蠅谓 未蔚谓 苇蠂蔚喂 蠁苇蟻蔚喂 蟿伪 伪蟺慰蟿蔚位苇蟽渭伪蟿伪 蟺慰蠀 苇蠂蔚喂 蠀蟺慰蟽蠂蔚胃蔚委 畏 螘蟺喂蟿蟻慰蟺萎 魏伪喂 蟺慰蠀 伪蟺伪喂蟿蔚委 畏 魏伪蟿伪蟺慰位苇渭畏蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 魏位喂渭伪蟿喂魏萎蟼 伪位位伪纬萎蟼. 螕喂伪 谓伪 蔚委渭伪蟽蟿蔚 位慰喂蟺蠈谓 蟽蠀谓蔚蟺蔚委蟼 渭蔚 蟿喂蟼 魏位喂渭伪蟿喂魏苇蟼 渭伪蟼 蠀蟺慰蠂蟻蔚蠋蟽蔚喂蟼, 胃伪 蠂蟻蔚喂伪蟽蟿慰蠉谓 纬蔚谓谓伪委蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蟻喂味慰蟽蟺伪蟽蟿喂魏苇蟼 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏苇蟼, 渭蔚 蟽蟿蠈蠂慰 蟿畏谓 伪蟽蠁维位蔚喂伪, 蟿畏谓 蟺慰喂蠈蟿畏蟿伪 魏伪喂 蟿慰 蟺蟻慰蟽喂蟿蠈 魏蠈蟽蟿慰蟼, 魏伪喂 渭蔚纬维位蔚蟼 未畏渭蠈蟽喂蔚蟼 蔚蟺蔚谓未蠉蟽蔚喂蟼 蟽蟿伪 渭苇蟽伪 蟽蟿伪胃蔚蟻萎蟼 蟿蟻慰蠂喂维蟼, 蟺慰蠀 谓伪 伪谓蟿喂蟽蟿慰喂蠂慰蠉谓 蟽蟿慰 蠉蠄慰蟼 蟿蠅谓 蟺蟻慰魏位萎蟽蔚蠅谓 魏伪喂 谓伪 尾蟻委蟽魏慰谓蟿伪喂 蟽蟿慰谓 伪谓蟿委蟺慰未伪 蟿蠅谓 喂未喂蠅蟿喂魏慰蟺慰喂萎蟽蔚蠅谓 魏伪喂 蟿畏蟼 蔚纬魏伪蟿维位蔚喂蠄畏蟼 蟿蠅谓 蠀蟺慰未慰渭蠋谓. 违蟺蠈 伪蠀蟿蠈 位慰喂蟺蠈谓 蟿慰 蟺蟻委蟽渭伪, 胃伪 伪尉喂慰位慰纬萎蟽慰蠀渭蔚 蟿喂蟼 蔚蟺蠈渭蔚谓蔚蟼 畏渭苇蟻蔚蟼 蟿喂蟼 蟽畏渭蔚蟻喂谓苇蟼 蟽伪蟼 蟺蟻慰蟿维蟽蔚喂蟼.

听听Andor Deli (NI). 鈥� Eln枚k Asszony! Ez a csomag egy 煤jabb fontos eleme a k枚zleked茅s z枚ld 谩t谩ll谩s谩t 枚szt枚nz艖 keretnek az EU ban. 脕m arr贸l sem szabad megfeledkezn眉nk, hogy a teher- 茅s szem茅lysz谩ll铆t谩st illet艖en ink谩bb a f枚ldrajzi Eur贸p谩ban kellene gondolkodni. Ez茅rt kiemelten fontos az Uni贸val k枚zvetlen眉l szomsz茅dos nyugat-balk谩ni orsz谩gok k枚zleked茅si infrastrukt煤r谩j谩nak fejleszt茅se is. Mindezeknek a jogszab谩lyoknak a v茅grehajt谩sa jelent艖s eszk枚z枚ket fog ig茅nyelni, ami megk枚veteli az uni贸s p茅nz眉gyi t谩mogat谩sok n枚vel茅s茅t is.

M茅gis azt kell tapasztalnunk, hogy a vas煤ti 茅s k枚z煤ti fejleszt茅seket t谩mogat贸 Eur贸pai H谩l贸zatfinansz铆roz谩si Eszk枚z, a CEF keretei 茅vek 贸ta stagn谩lnak, s艖t cs枚kkennek. L谩tva az idei k枚lts茅gvet茅st 茅s a 2024-es k枚lts茅gvet茅si tervezetet, a koh茅zi贸s alapokb贸l sz谩rmaz贸 kifizet茅sek is t枚rt茅nelmi minimumon vannak. Tov谩bb谩 az 煤j forr谩sok k枚z眉l a helyre谩ll铆t谩si alap kifizet茅sei h谩rom 茅v ut谩n mind枚ssze 160 milli谩rdot 茅rtek el a 740 b艖l, 茅s 5 tag谩llam m茅g egy谩ltal谩n nem r茅szes眉lt t谩mogat谩sban. Ez茅rt felh铆vn谩m a figyelmet arra, hogy ahhoz, hogy sikeres legyen az 谩t谩ll谩s, 枚sszhangra van sz眉ks茅g az EU p茅nz眉gyi t谩mogat谩si rendszerei 茅s a szakpolitikai c茅lkit疟z茅sek k枚z枚tt. M谩sk眉l枚nben e c茅lok csak pap铆ron fognak megval贸sulni.

听听Massimiliano Salini (PPE). 鈥� Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, abbiamo osservato alcuni elementi davvero positivi nella proposta della Commissione, con riferimento in prima battuta alla nuova possibile gestione della capacit脿 ferroviaria. In quell'ambito sicuramente c'猫 spazio per un lavoro interessante.

I miglioramenti in termini di efficienza della gestione dell'infrastruttura esistente fanno stimare una performance che potrebbe migliorare del 4听%; considerate che su 200听000 chilometri di infrastrutture ferroviarie un miglioramento dell'efficienza del 4听% equivale a dire 8听000 chilometri in pi霉 di infrastruttura ferroviaria utilizzata senza averla costruita. In continuit脿 con l'ERTMS 猫 una buona notizia.

Sul tema, invece, del trasporto su gomma ci sono nuove regole che fanno nascere veramente molti dubbi. Da un lato, l'eccesso di regole relative all'elettrificazione 鈥� diciamo cos矛 鈥� della mobilit脿 su gomma, che apre uno scenario sul quale la discussione all'interno del Parlamento 猫 ancora molto aperta e, in generale, il tema dell'armonizzazione tra vari paesi.

脠 un lavoro che dobbiamo continuare a fare, ci sono lati positivi e lati negativi su cui lavorare.

听听Erik Bergkvist (S&D). 鈥� Fru talman! B盲sta ledam枚ter. Vi har i flera 氓r nu jobbat med att st盲lla om v氓ra transportsystem s氓 att de ska bli gr枚na. V盲gen till m氓let 盲r fortfarande guppig, och m氓nga farliga korsningar 氓terst氓r.

N氓gra viktiga problem som m氓ste hanteras 盲r bland annat den stora bristen p氓 chauff枚rer f枚r tunga fordon. Vi m氓ste ocks氓 snabba p氓 gr枚na br盲nslen och en effektivare anv盲ndning av de br盲nslen som vi har idag. Kostnaderna f枚r ny infrastruktur och underh氓ll av den nuvarande 盲r v盲ldigt h枚ga. Stora och l氓nga transporter kan h盲r g枚ra v盲ldigt stor nytta och bidra till effektiviseringar och harmoniseringar i hela transportsystemet.

Kan vi hitta en bra balans h盲r tar vi viktiga steg i den gr枚na omst盲llningen. V盲gen mot m氓let 盲r inte l盲ngre lika guppig och antalet farliga korsningar inte lika m氓nga.

听听Izaskun Bilbao Barandica (Renew). 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, se帽ora comisaria, descarbonizar el transporte es una de las claves para alcanzar nuestros objetivos clim谩ticos. Saludo este paquete porque incide en cuestiones cr铆ticas para conseguirlo, incluidas las emisiones y los veh铆culos. Espero que nos anime, adem谩s, a cumplir normas que ya tenemos, como el paquete de movilidad y el ferroviario, que son una base excelente para afrontar esta transformaci贸n. Subrayo cuatro ideas:

La clave: las personas. Necesitamos una formaci贸n profesional predictiva para preparar a los profesionales que necesita un sistema integrado de movilidad.

El instrumento: la digitalizaci贸n. No podremos mejorar en la gesti贸n e integraci贸n de los modos de transporte sin un ecosistema de datos de movilidad.

Las condiciones: cumplir nuestros compromisos de inversi贸n en infraestructuras y equiparlas. Las v铆as ERTMS multiplican la capacidad y la velocidad que pueden acoger nuestros corredores prioritarios de transporte.

Y el contexto: abordar esta transici贸n con transparencia y buscar la complicidad ciudadana, recordando cada d铆a que este proceso necesita del compromiso de cada uno de nosotros.

La recompensa: aire m谩s limpio y mejores servicios.

听听Ciar谩n Cuffe (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Madam President, Commissioner, the transport proposals you have released today are very welcome. We need more transparency on emissions so that people and business can make sustainable transport choices. We need to improve our rail services and we need to prepare heavy-duty vehicles for the green transition.

However, I am concerned about your final proposal on the weights and dimensions of vehicles. I hear that this proposal could bring more mega trucks or gigaliners onto EU roads by regulating bilateral deals between EU countries on cross-border travel by these vehicles.

Commissioner, I do not want to remind you, just like the SUVs, giant vehicles like these are dangerous for other road users. They are damaging to our roads, our bridges and our tunnels. They are more polluting and cancel out any gains made through emission reductions and they undermine the crucial shift to rail. So I hope you do not want to allow more of these dangerous and polluting vehicles on our roads and that you can provide clarity on this proposal.

听听Henna Virkkunen (PPE). 鈥� Madam President, dear Commissioner Urpilainen, I would like to thank the Commission for presenting the greening transport package. Of course, it needs to be closely analysed now, but it鈥檚 a very important topic, as we know, because we have great challenges in reducing emissions in road transport. But much is already being done and many methods are being developed.

There are three points that I would like to underline here when we speak about greening the transport sector. First, competitiveness: it is important to make sure that the methods to reduce emissions are environmentally sustainable, but also economically and socially sustainable.

Second, flexibility: it鈥檚 important to keep in mind that we have very different regions in Europe and their different conditions need to be taken into account. And this is why Member States need flexibility to their own solutions.

And the third is about technology neutrality. We know that many different means are needed for successful solutions here. So the regulation must be made for the long term, be future-proof and also technology-neutral.

And in addition to these three points, we also need more investments in digitalisation, automation and modern infrastructure to be competitive in the future.

听听Kathleen Van Brempt (S&D). 鈥� Voorzitter, commissaris, het belang van logistiek kan uiteraard niet voldoende benadrukt worden. Dat heeft trouwens de pandemie 鈥撎齧aar ook de energiecrisis听鈥� nog maar eens duidelijk bewezen.

Ik wil heel erg benadrukken dat de toekomst van onze logistieke sector zich op drie assen bevindt die ook erg met elkaar verbonden zijn. Uiteraard duurzaamheid, vergroening, de Green Deal 鈥� without any doubt 鈥�, maar ook de digitalisering. En de digitalisering kan ook 茅cht aanleiding geven tot het verder vergroenen. Maar het zal u niet verbazen dat ik als sociaaldemocraat ook erg wil benadrukken hoe goede jobs, kwaliteitsvolle jobs, goedbetaalde jobs belangrijk zijn in de sector.

Een duidelijk en eenvormig kader voor het meten en berekenen van uitstoot is essentieel in het pakket dat jullie vandaag voorstellen. Maar van even groot belang is dat we transportsystemen ook beter op elkaar afstemmen, omdat ze goed met elkaar te combineren zijn. En daarom roep ik de Commissie op om erg snel werk te maken van de richtlijn gecombineerd vervoer. Elk initiatief dat ons op de weg zet naar een duurzame, eerlijke en moderne transportsector kan op de steun van mijn fractie rekenen.

听听Jan-Christoph Oetjen (Renew). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, Frau Kommissarin, verehrte Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Ich finde es gut, dass jetzt der Vorschlag endlich vorliegt f眉r die 脰kologisierung des Verkehrs. Gerade das Thema der Emissionsmessung ist, glaube ich, eins, mit dem wir mehr Transparenz f眉r die B眉rgerinnen und B眉rger erreichen k枚nnen.

Wir als Freie Demokraten werden daf眉r k盲mpfen, dass in diesem Bericht steht, dass die technologische Neutralit盲t hochgehalten wird. Ich glaube, wir brauchen f眉r den CO2鈥攏eutralen Transport von G眉tern m枚glichst alle Technologien, die uns zur Verf眉gung stehen. Denn Speditionsunternehmen sind in der Regel Mittelst盲ndler, und sie brauchen f眉r ihr Gesch盲ftsmodell das passende Fahrzeug mit der passenden Infrastruktur, verehrte Kolleginnen und Kollegen!

Ich m枚chte an dieser Stelle einmal sagen, weil ja hier so die Angst aufgemacht wird vor den Riesen-Lkw: Gr枚脽ere Lkw, l盲ngere Lkw sind 枚kologischer, denn sie emittieren weniger CO2 pro transportierter Tonne Fracht. Sie haben auch eine niedrigere Achslast pro Achse und sind deswegen auch f眉r den Stra脽enverkehr durchaus gut zu gebrauchen. Und sie k枚nnen auf definierten Strecken gut eingesetzt werden und sind deswegen ein guter Beitrag zur Dekarbonisierung des Verkehrs.

听听Anna Deparnay-Grunenberg (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin! Mehr G眉ter auf die Schiene, liebe Freundinnen und Freunde, meine Damen und Herren, das wollen wir ewig schon! Dieses Paket enth盲lt mehrere Gesetze mit genau diesem Potenzial. Ein Gesetz z.听B. regelt, wie man Fahrpl盲ne international abstimmt. Es macht au脽erdem f眉r Logistikunternehmer flexibler, Trassen zu buchen. Auch die Richtlinie zum kombinierten Verkehr, also Schiene und Lkw gemischt, hat enormes Potenzial f眉rs Klima. Richtig aufregend finde ich den Vorschlag zu CountEmissions EU. Da hei脽t es eben: Logistikunternehmen m眉ssen offenlegen, wie viel Emissionen sie jeweils beim Transport von G眉tern verursachen. Die Bahn wird da nat眉rlich die gro脽e Gewinnerin sein.

Auch die n盲chsten Schritte sind f眉r uns damit klar. Wir brauchen ein Siegel f眉r umweltfreundlichen G眉tertransport, und wir wollen auch mehr Transparenz f眉r den Personenverkehr. Als Reisende wei脽 ich dann schon beim Buchen, mit welchem Verkehrsmittel ich pers枚nlich welchen Einfluss auf das Klima nehme, und da fahre ich pers枚nlich 枚fter Bahn oder schicke als Unternehmen eben meine Ware 眉ber die Schiene.

Packen wir es an! Ich freue mich auf diese Arbeit.

听听Se谩n Kelly (PPE). 鈥� A Uachtar谩in, heavy-duty transport is the backbone of trade and commerce in Europe: 73% of all freight transported by land in the EU is carried by trucks. Alongside rail freight, trucks deliver goods safely across Europe. These extensive and integrated supply chains keep our supermarket shelves stocked.

However, the sector causes negative impacts on the environment. Heavy-duty transport is responsible for nearly one third of the EU鈥檚 road transport CO2 emissions, primarily driven by growth in economic activity. The sheer volume of transport activity has impacted our greenhouse gas emissions, and demands on all types of transport are expected to increase. This is a natural progression as economies develop.

The greening transport package proposes measures to rethink the allocation of rail track capacity and the methodology for counting the emissions of a transport job. In recent years, cleaner road vehicles and fuels have become more and more available, and I鈥檓 aware of big efforts being made by many heavy-duty transport manufacturers to use technology to reduce emissions. I think we should work with the industry and establish a fundamental shift towards sustainability in the way goods and people move around.

听听Achille Variati (S&D). 鈥� Signora Presidente, signora Commissaria, onorevoli colleghi, ho ascoltato con piacere la presentazione da parte della Commissione di questo nuovo pacchetto che, con diversi interventi legislativi, punta a rendere il settore dei trasporti pi霉 sostenibile.

Accolgo con favore l'intenzione di proporre misure per gestire, coordinare e aumentare le capacit脿 delle ferrovie. Il trasporto ferroviario, infatti, 猫 una modalit脿 di trasporto efficiente dal punto di vista energetico e rispettosa dell'ambiente.

Tuttavia i servizi transfrontalieri di trasporto merci e passeggeri continuano a incontrare ostacoli che ne limitano la competitivit脿 e l'attrattivit脿.

Allo stesso modo, sono favorevole a una introduzione di metodologie specifiche per l'assegnazione del biglietto di viaggio da parte degli operatori del quantitativo di CO2 emesso dal mezzo di trasporto per le tratte acquistate. Ritengo che questa possa essere una valida misura per sensibilizzare i viaggiatori.

Infine, per quanto riguarda l'armonizzazione delle dimensioni dei camion elettrici, sono d'accordo sul fatto di tener conto dell'evoluzione delle batterie per l'elettrico, ma ritengo che la sicurezza stradale debba sempre essere messa al primo posto e pertanto saranno necessarie, secondo me, maggiori valutazioni su questo aspetto per un'armonizzazione per la circolazione sulle strade europee di mega camion di peso maggiorato fino a quattro tonnellate.

听听Andreas Schieder (S&D). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, Frau Kommissarin, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Es gibt viele gute Punkte in diesem Paket, aber auch einige Kritikpunkte. Einer ist: Wieder einmal plant die Kommission Riesen-Lkw, sogenannte Gigaliner, zuzulassen. Geht es nach den Vorschl盲gen, die wir heute geh枚rt haben, werden auf Europas Stra脽en nun auch grenz眉berschreitend Monstertrucks rollen. Ich halte das, ehrlich gesagt, f眉r einen verkehrspolitischen Irrweg. Warum? Weil es eine Verkehrsverlagerung in die falsche Richtung ist, n盲mlich von der Schiene wieder zur眉ck auf die Stra脽e. Und das wollen wir nicht.

Zus盲tzlich gibt es noch enorme Kosten f眉r die Umr眉stung, z.听B. der Infrastruktur. Dieses ganze Geld, das man da investieren muss, w盲re wohl besser in den Ausbau der Schiene und der Eisenbahn und den Umstieg von der Stra脽e auf die Schiene investiert. Denn dann erreichen wir die Klimaziele besser, setzen den Gr眉nen Deal besser um, bringen mehr Sicherheit auf unsere Stra脽en und auch mehr faire Arbeitsbedingungen f眉r die Lkw-Fahrer. Daher ein ganz klares Nein zu den Gigalinern, ein Nein zu Riesen-Lkws auf unseren Stra脽en.

听听Vera Tax (S&D). 鈥� Madam President, dear Commissioner, I welcome the freight greening package that will address the problems in long-distance and cross-border rail transport, but also on the issue of the weight and size of trucks. The latter will have positive implications for zero-emission heavy vehicles and aligns the weight limit with the introduction of electric heavy vehicles to offset batteries.

I welcome the increased rail capacity. European rail freight is the most efficient way to transport goods over longer distances and avoid heavy congestion on roads and pollution. But at the moment there is no efficiency because of fragmented national rail systems that cause high costs and waiting times at border crossings. This European Commission proposal improves coordination between national capacity managers and align rules to increase the share of European rail traffic. Corridors and corridor management should not be limited to rail, but also include ports, terminals and unloading and uploading stations connecting to maritime and road transport.

Catch-the-eye procedure

听听Clare Daly (The Left). 鈥� Madam President, so we have a new package published by the Commission less than a year before the end of the mandate and we鈥檙e expected to believe that it鈥檚 finally going to be possible to transfer road traffic to rail with the resulting reduction in emissions. I mean, come on. We have to look at the 10听years up to 2021 where we鈥檝e actually seen rail鈥檚 share of total freight transport decreasing in 16 of the Member States that have railways, while road freight transport has increased by 1.7%.

Now we know that freight transport is continuing to grow, expected to increase by about 40% by 2030 and 80% by 2050. And we know the constraints that are on our roads with the shortage of drivers and so on. But rail transport has deep developmental constraints, partly as a result of European and national policies that have underinvested for decades. Not least, we have to reverse the approach and see rail as a public asset requiring public investment, while rail freight should be recognised as a service of public interest, which is completely against the neoliberal privatised model that so many of our Member States have adopted.

听听Mick Wallace (The Left). 鈥� Madam President, if we were serious about addressing the transport problems from a congestion point of view, from a resource point to view, from an environmental point of view, how in God鈥檚 name have we not done more to advance the rail project? You go around any country in Europe and you鈥檒l see a rail track that鈥檚 not even being used, that鈥檚 actually been closed down. I see it in Ireland. I see it in Italy. I see rail in France that鈥檚 not being used.

OK, we made improvements between some of the big cities with some fast track, but very little of it. China has built 30听000听km of fast鈥攖rack rail. Now Europe has only a fraction of that because we don鈥檛 seem to have had the appetite for it. It鈥檚 a no鈥攂rainer from the environmental point of view. But yet we鈥檙e not going there: if we鈥檙e serious about it, we seem to be able to do what we really want to do when we set up a task of doing it. But we haven鈥檛 done it with rail and it鈥檚 madness.

(End of catch-the-eye procedure)

听听Jutta Urpilainen, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, honourable Members, first, I want to thank you for this very interesting debate, and I will definitely pass all your messages to my dear colleague, Commissioner V膬lean, who is still in the press room. The European freight sector is at a turning point. Demand is increasing, but it must seize the opportunities offered by the dual green and digital transition to become less polluting and more resilient and to continue to thrive in tomorrow鈥檚 globalised economy. All modes need to play their part and work more efficiently, individually and together. And these steps to green freight transport will take us further along the path set out by the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy towards achieving our European Green Deal objectives for transport. The initiatives in today鈥檚 package all target decarbonisation. They aim to reduce the environmental impact of rail transport and will also allow our single market to grow. They build on and complement the various initiatives already put forward during this Commission鈥檚 mandate.

So I count on the European 合法博彩网站鈥檚 support to rapidly take up the proposals we have put on the table today, so that an agreement can be reached still under this mandate. Thank you very much for this debate.

S膾DI VADA: ROBERTS Z莫LE
Priek拧s膿d膿t膩jas vietnieks

听听S膿des vad墨t膩js. 鈥� Debates ir sl膿gtas.

Rakstiski pazi艈ojumi (171. pants)

听听Marian-Jean Marinescu (PPE), 卯n scris. 鈥� 脦nc膬 de la lansarea Green Deal a fost evident c膬 f膬r膬 decarbonizarea transportului, reducerea emisiilor de carbon va fi imposibil膬. O realitate pe deplin 卯n葲eleas膬 de industrie, care 卯ns膬 a semnalat constant c膬 are nevoie de sprijin 葯i de o abordare realist膬 卯n acest proces dificil 葯i foarte costisitor.

脦n aceast膬 ecua葲ie foarte complicat膬, transportul feroviar este o solu葲ie al c膬rei poten葲ial nu este nici bine 卯n葲eles 葯i nici bine exploatat de c膬tre cei care propun politicile Green Deal, cel pu葲in p芒n膬 acum.

De mult timp am atras aten葲ia c膬 relansarea transportului feroviar este genul de solu葲ie care reduce din presiunea obliga葲iilor impuse celorlalte moduri de transport. 脦n acela葯i timp, am spus 葯i c膬 f膬r膬 finan葲are 葯i m膬suri concrete, obiectivul Shift to Rail risc膬 s膬 r膬m芒n膬 doar un slogan.

脦nc膬 din 2019 am depus un proiect pilot care viza eliminarea blocajelor, 卯mbun膬t膬葲irea interoperabilit膬葲ii feroviare, eliminarea leg膬turilor lips膬 葯i 卯mbun膬t膬葲irea tronsoanelor transfrontaliere, adic膬 卯n mare parte ceea ce ne propune acum Comisia.

De葯i venit cu mare 卯nt芒rziere, sper ca regulamentul privind utilizarea capacit膬葲ii de infrastructur膬 feroviar膬 s膬 rezolve m膬car o parte dintre probleme 葯i 卯n viitor s膬 avem o cale ferat膬 european膬 integral conectat膬, operabil膬 葯i cu standarde comune.