合法博彩网站

听听President. 鈥� The next item is the debate on the report by Alessandra Moretti, on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, on the proposal for a regulation of the European 合法博彩网站 and of the Council establishing a framework for setting eco-design requirements for sustainable products and repealing Directive 2009/125/EC (听鈥撎鼵9-0132/2022听鈥撎�) (A9-0218/2023).

听听Alessandra Moretti, relatrice. 鈥� Signor Presidente, signor Commissario, onorevoli colleghi, quella che voteremo domani 猫 una proposta destinata ad avere un grosso impatto sulla nostra societ脿, sulle nostre imprese e sui nostri consumatori.

Questo regolamento infatti cambier脿 in modo radicale le modalit脿 di operare dell'industria in tantissimi settori, indicando al mondo produttivo la strada per gestire l'intero ciclo di vita di un prodotto, compreso il fine vita.

Un regolamento che trova la sua ratio nel rispetto dei limiti del nostro pianeta, istituendo un quadro legislativo che contribuir脿 a rendere i prodotti conformi a un'economia neutra dal punto di vista climatico, efficiente sotto il profilo delle risorse e circolare.

I prodotti che saranno progressivamente immessi sul mercato, quindi, dovranno essere progettati in modo tale da rispettare l'ambiente, l'ecosistema e proteggere la salute dei cittadini.

Inoltre si permetter脿 ai consumatori di risparmiare energia, di poter riparare i prodotti che acquistano anzich茅 doverli gettare e di dare loro la possibilit脿, attraverso il passaporto digitale, di essere pienamente consapevoli circa quello che acquistano.

Il passaporto digitale rappresenta un'importante innovazione nel panorama attuale e uno strumento decisivo per promuovere la circolarit脿: i nuovi prodotti che saranno disponibili potranno essere infatti venduti solo se accompagnati da questo strumento, che dovr脿 contenere informazioni accurate e aggiornate sull'impatto ambientale dei prodotti in circolazione, al fine di consentire a tutti di fare scelte consapevoli.

Un recente studio della Corte dei conti europea ha tristemente evidenziato che le strategie e i finanziamenti europei hanno avuto finora un impatto modesto sulla transizione verso l'economia circolare e che il ritardo pi霉 marcato riguarda proprio la progettazione.

La proposta che ci apprestiamo a votare non investe solo nella gestione dei rifiuti, ma anche nella progettazione circolare: tuttavia non 猫 solo importante come progettiamo il prodotto, 猫 questione rilevante anche come lo realizziamo, in quali aziende e a quali condizioni di lavoro.

A livello mondiale, ad esempio, il settore tessile d脿 lavoro a 60 milioni di persone, principalmente donne, e spesso le paghe dei lavoratori tessili sono di gran lunga inferiori ai salari di sussistenza. Ricordiamo a tutti la tragedia del Rana Plaza, la fabbrica tessile in Bangladesh dove dieci anni fa sono morte pi霉 di 1听000 persone. In quella fabbrica si realizzavano quei vestiti che, per pochi euro e senza porci troppe domande, compriamo anche qui in Europa.

Ho voluto cos矛 chiedere alla Commissione che nei prossimi anni valuti l'opportunit脿 di estendere il campo di applicazione della proposta anche ai requisiti di sostenibilit脿 sociale e di dovuta diligenza.

Nella sola Europa, poi, ciascuno di noi scarta circa dodici chili di vestiti ogni anno e la maggior parte di questi scarti va ad aumentare l'inquinamento degli ecosistemi di tutto il mondo ma, senza ipocrisie, dobbiamo dire che va ad inquinare soprattutto i paesi pi霉 poveri, che da sempre diventano il ricettacolo di quanto noi occidentali scartiamo.

C'猫, inoltre, il tema dei prodotti invenduti. Questo regolamento introduce un divieto diretto alla distruzione dei prodotti di consumo invenduti, che dovrebbe applicarsi ai tessili e agli apparecchi elettronici. Alla fine del loro ciclo di vita i prodotti non saranno pi霉 un rifiuto, fonte di inquinamento, ma una nuova risorsa da utilizzare nel processo produttivo.

La proposta si propone infine di migliorare il potenziale del mercato unico, rafforzando le attivit脿 di sorveglianza del mercato, garantendo alle imprese, in particolare le piccole e medie, di svolgere le loro attivit脿 in condizioni di parit脿 con i loro competitor extraeuropei.

Cari colleghi, nessun cambiamento 猫 impossibile. Sta a noi, a ciascuno di noi, fare la propria parte e per farlo serve avere a disposizione tutte le informazioni di un prodotto e assumere cos矛 le scelte pi霉 giuste. Con queste scelte possiamo migliorare il contesto in cui viviamo, senza limitarci a pensare a ci貌 che vediamo sotto i nostri occhi, ma tendendo lo sguardo verso il futuro, oltre i nostri confini, dove persone sono costrette a lavorare in condizioni inaccettabili, sacrificando diritti e libert脿, per permetterci di continuare questo insostenibile e ingiusto stile di vita.

听听Maria Spyraki, rapporteur for the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy. 鈥� Mr President, Commissioner, dear colleagues, the proposal for a new Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation is, to my opinion, the cornerstone of our single market approach to new environmentally sustainable and circular products.

As the rapporteur of the opinion on behalf of the ITRE Committee in this regulation, I would like to underline that we tried a lot to explain the added value of incorporating renewability idea as an ecodesign parameter, and we believe that, in this regard, we are paving the way into a more circular approach.

Why is this so important? Because, first of all, beyond products, also the business models that deliver them play a critical role. Rather than simply launching a new product which can improve material and energy efficiency, as it is in the case of linear model, moving to a circular business model requires a complete integration of circular design, as well as collection and redistribution infrastructure. Therefore, we pave the way from the linear model of industrial production to circular model.

Government initiatives to advance sustainability have concentrated on product recycling and reuse, waste management, which happens to be the last step of the linear model.

Allow me, Mr听President, to conclude with this: such a reprioritisation can be performed only on the basis of an updated, efficient and coherent legal framework that paves the new era of the European internal market. Believe me, ESPR is on the right path.

听听David Cormand, rapporteur pour avis de la commission du march茅 int茅rieur et de la protection des consommateurs. 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, je tiens 脿 remercier Alessandra Moretti pour son excellent rapport. Bravo! Vous avez r茅ussi un exploit et on est fiers de pouvoir voter sur un texte ambitieux.

Le r猫glement sur l鈥櫭ヽoconception des produits a pour horizon de permettre 脿 terme que seuls des produits durables puissent circuler sur le march茅 europ茅en. C鈥檈st une victoire des consommatrices et des consommateurs et c鈥檈st une victoire de la plan猫te sur la soci茅t茅 de consumation.

Dans ce r猫glement, nous avons permis trois avanc茅es d茅cisives. Tout d鈥檃bord, l鈥檌nterdiction explicite des pratiques d鈥檕bsolescence pr茅matur茅e. C鈥檈st un vieux combat et c鈥檈st sous cette mandature que nous avons r茅ussi 脿 l鈥檈mporter. Pour la premi猫re fois, nous reconnaissons l鈥檈xistence de ces pratiques et nous chargeons la Commission de les nommer et de les exclure pour chaque cat茅gorie de produits.

Ensuite, la mise en place du score de r茅parabilit茅. Enfin nous appelons 脿 茅tablir au niveau europ茅en un affichage qui permette aux consommatrices et aux consommateurs de comparer la r茅parabilit茅 des produits qu鈥檌ls ach猫tent! Enfin nous r茅compensons les constructeurs qui con莽oivent des produits qui durent!

Enfin, l鈥檌nterdiction de la destruction des invendus de produits textiles et 茅lectroniques. Merci 脿 la commission de l鈥檈nvironnement d鈥檃voir pu porter cette r茅volution. Plus de d茅tours ou de faux d茅fauts d鈥檌nformation, nous appelons avec vigueur 脿 r茅glementer au plus vite les secteurs qui pratiquent le gaspillage en masse. C鈥檈st un mandat que nous pouvons c茅l茅brer par nos votes. C鈥檈st avec joie que je nous appelle 脿 adopter ce texte que nous pourrons d茅fendre ensemble, avec d茅termination, avec le Conseil.

听听Virginijus Sinkevi膷ius, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Mr President, honourable Members, my sincere thanks to this House for putting the ecodesign for sustainable products proposal on the agenda for this plenary session and for hosting this important debate this evening. Rapporteur Alessandra听Moretti, ENVI Chair Pascal听Canfin, opinion rapporteurs David听Cormand and Maria听Spyraki, as well as shadow rapporteurs and many other Members have done a tremendous job making this file forward in excellent time and laying the foundation for what I truly hope will be tomorrow鈥檚 adoption of a constructive 合法博彩网站 mandate to enter trialogues.

The work you have carried out in little over a year leads me to believe that you see a strong potential in the new Ecodesign Regulation, and the existing ecodesign framework has already proven its effectiveness by making energy related products more efficient. Current ecodesign and energy labelling cumulatively amount to a 10% lower annual energy consumption by the products in scope, comparable to the energy consumption of Poland. And this translates into reduction of several hundred euros on energy bills of EU households each year.

By enabling us for the first time to ensure that a wide range of products are designed for circularity and sustainability, this new Ecodesign Regulation will speed up our move from the linear 鈥榯ake, make, use, dispose鈥� economic model to one in which we need less, retain more and contribute to fostering the circular transformation of our economy.

While the Commission still reserves its position at this stage in the process, I am pleased that in many places 合法博彩网站 have preserved a high level of environmental ambition as well as the core single market principles of the proposal. I nevertheless want to draw attention to a number of points.

Firstly, it is vitally important to ensure that the new Ecodesign Regulation remains coherent with existing legislation. This is particularly true for the complex field of chemicals here. If any ecodesign provision overlaps with the scope of other already existing rules 鈥� for example, REACH 鈥� the only outcome will be confusion leading to ineffective implementation and reduced compliance.

Secondly, in relation to destruction of unsold consumer products. We understand the 合法博彩网站 would like to take direct action in this area. Regardless of the final outcome, it will be essential for the measures to work in practice and prevent loopholes and circumvention. The better we think through and design these provisions now, the more effective they will be once in place.

Another aspect I want to touch on is online marketplaces. These play a crucial role in today鈥檚 supply chains, allowing economic operators to reach an ever-increasing number of customers. And the rules put forward for these entities aim to complement those under the Digital Services Act. Through compliance with eco design regulation, a level playing field for a sustainable marketplace will be created.

Finally, let me be practical and realistic. Much work needs to be done under the new Ecodesign Regulation 鈥� and done fast. If the current negative environmental trends are to be reversed and for our industry to benefit from its competitive advantages in circular products and technologies, any obligations or procedures added during negotiations must work in practice and not pose undue delays. The Commission will ensure alignment with the Treaty and the Interinstitutional Agreement on better regulation.

Honourable Members, I hope that today鈥檚 discussion will pave the way for a positive outcome at tomorrow鈥檚 vote, and I look forward to entering the next phase of negotiations so that another key milestone in the EU鈥檚 circular transition can be crossed.

听听Jessica Polfj盲rd, f枚r PPE-gruppen. 鈥� Herr talman! Herr kommission盲r. Det har redan g氓tt tre 氓r sedan kommissionen presenterade sin handlingsplan f枚r cirkul盲r ekonomi och vi h盲r i Europaparlamentet utarbetade v氓rt initiativbet盲nkande.

Sedan dess har vi tagit tydliga steg f枚r att uppn氓 v氓ra klimatm氓l, och nu visar vi ocks氓 att vi levererar p氓 omst盲llningen till en mer cirkul盲r ekonomi. Det 盲r en stor framg氓ng och jag skulle vilja tacka f枚redragande Moretti och mina skuggkollegor f枚r ett gott samarbete, och f枚r att vi har n氓tt en 枚verenskommelse.

Det r氓der stor os盲kerhet i Europa, b氓de politiskt och ekonomiskt. D氓 盲r det s盲rskilt viktigt att s盲kerst盲lla och uppr盲tth氓lla det st枚d som vi har f氓tt av v盲ljarna f枚r v氓r milj枚politik. Det betyder att vi m氓ste t盲nka noggrant p氓 hur vi genomf枚r den. Tydliga ramar 盲r v盲gen fram氓t, inte detaljstyrning.

F枚r f枚retagen 盲r det viktigaste ganska enkelt: alla vill ha m枚jligheten att konkurrera p氓 lika villkor. Jag tror att vi har gett dem verktygen f枚r att kunna anv盲nda det som 盲r en av v氓ra viktigaste tillg氓ngar, n盲mligen den europeiska inre marknaden. V氓r inre marknad 盲r en av v氓r unions st枚rsta styrkor. Tyv盲rr anv盲nder vi den inte fullt ut och anv盲nder hela potentialen. Ibland kan vi till och med undergr盲va dess funktionalitet.

Att ta bort interna hinder f枚r handel och tillv盲xt har d盲rf枚r varit en av mina viktigaste prioriteringar. Men vi har ocks氓 lagt helt nya f枚rslag p氓 bordet, inte minst vad g盲ller h氓rdare tag f枚r att uppmuntra mer h氓llbara v盲rdekedjor b氓de inom textil och p氓 elektroniksidan. Med dessa regler tror jag att europeisk industri p氓 lika villkor f氓r m枚jligheten att st盲lla om. Med detta f枚rslag 盲r vi p氓 r盲tt v盲g att skapa en EU鈥攎arknad f枚r h氓llbara produkter. Det 盲r r盲tt v盲g att g氓.

听听Erik Bergkvist, f枚r S&D-gruppen. 鈥� Herr talman! B盲sta ledam枚ter. Ekodesign kommer att ge oss bra m枚jligheter att skapa h氓llbara produkter och energieffektiva produkter f枚r v氓r inre marknad. Det kommer att skapa f枚ruts盲ttningar f枚r f枚retag och industrier att skapa h氓llbara processer och kunna jobba cirkul盲rt p氓 ett s盲tt som man inte har jobbat tidigare. Det kommer att ge oss f枚ruts盲ttningar att ta bort d氓liga produkter. Att skapa h氓llbara, lagningsbara, l氓ngsiktiga produkter d盲r vi ser till hela livscykeln.

F枚r oss socialdemokrater har det ocks氓 varit v盲ldigt viktigt att man faktiskt ser till helheten. F枚r att g枚ra det m氓ste man se alla l盲nkar i kedjan, och 盲ven ta med de sociala aspekterna f枚r dem som faktiskt producerar v氓ra h氓llbara produkter. D氓 n盲r man g枚r det, n盲r man ser alla dessa delar, d氓 har vi skapat h氓llbarhet p氓 riktigt.

听听R贸偶a Thun und Hohenstein, w imieniu grupy Renew. 鈥� Panie Przewodnicz膮cy! Zgadzam si臋 z wszystkimi, kt贸rzy tutaj m贸wili, 偶e ten ekoprojekt to jest legislacja niezwykle ambitna i kluczowa dla ochrony klimatu. I dzi臋ki niej mo偶emy pom贸c trwale zmieni膰 nastawienie konsument贸w i producent贸w do zasob贸w Ziemi. Zasoby Ziemi s膮 ograniczone. Musimy podchodzi膰 do nich z my艣l膮 o nast臋pnych pokoleniach, o tych pokoleniach, kt贸re przyjd膮 po nas.

M贸wili艣my dzisiaj 鈥� 12 godzin temu 鈥� du偶o na ten temat z panem komisarzem przy okazji dyskusji o nature restoration law. To to w og贸le jest taki dzie艅, kiedy bardzo du偶o m贸wimy o ochronie 艣rodowiska. Ja z tym nastawieniem podchodzi艂am r贸wnie偶 do tego fragmentu legislacji. Pracowa艂am nad tym ekoprojektem jako kontrsprawozdawczyni w Komisji Rynku Wewn臋trznego i Ochrony Konsument贸w. I ciesz臋 si臋, 偶e t臋 dobr膮 propozycj臋 Komisji uda艂o si臋 nam w kilku aspektach jeszcze poprawi膰, uczyni膰 j膮 jeszcze troch臋 lepsz膮.

I wymieni臋 tylko dwa punkty. Po pierwsze 鈥� na co wielu czeka艂o 鈥� wskazujemy wyra藕nie, 偶e wymogi w zakresie ekoprojektu powinny dotyczy膰 wprowadzenia wsp贸lnej 艂adowarki do podobnych produkt贸w, np. narz臋dzi ogrodniczych, wiertarek elektrycznych lub produkt贸w, kt贸re musz膮 by膰 zabezpieczone przed wilgoci膮 czy przed wod膮, jak szczoteczki do z臋b贸w, golarki itp. A lubimy konkrety.

Po drugie koniec z papierowymi ksi臋gami, instrukcjami, kt贸re zawsze by艂y do艂膮czone w dziesi臋ciu j臋zykach do wszelakich produkt贸w. Instrukcje b臋d膮 艂atwo dost臋pne w formacie cyfrowym i drukowane tylko na 偶yczenie konsumenta. W ten spos贸b uratujemy miliony drzew i licz臋, 偶e my jutro zag艂osujemy za tymi zmianami, a Komisja i Rada popr膮 te propozycje.

听听Sara Matthieu, namens de Verts/ALE-Fractie. 鈥� Voorzitter, onze producten gaan veel te snel kapot en dat kost ons veel geld. En dat is ook slecht voor het milieu. Smartphones die na anderhalf jaar stuk zijn of een koffiemachine die net na de garantie het meteen begeeft. En als onze spullen kapotgaan, zijn ze ook nog eens moeilijk te herstellen. De onderdelen zitten vastgelijmd, er zijn geen wisselstukken beschikbaar of ze zijn te duur. Er zijn geen herstellers in de buurt, dus wat doen we dan? We kopen een nieuw toestel en het oude gaat naar het stort of wordt vernietigd in een verbrandingsoven.

Maar met deze nieuwe verordening ecologisch ontwerp ruilen we onze wegwerpeconomie om voor een echte circulaire economie. Dat wil zeggen dat onze kledij, onze meubels, onze elektrische apparaten langer meegaan, dat ze beter herstelbaar zijn, dat ze herbruikbaar zijn en recycleerbaar. En dat wil zeggen dat onze jeans een minimumaantal wasbeurten zal meegaan, makkelijker te recycleren zal zijn en uit meer gerecycleerde grondstoffen gaat bestaan, dat onze wasmachine of onze smartphone goedkoop te repareren zal zijn en gegarandeerd langer zal meegaan, dat we verplichte info krijgen over de levensduur van onze producten en hoe makkelijk we een toestel kunnen repareren, en dat we eindelijk zullen gaan verbieden dat de bedrijven vandaag de onverkochte goederen en de teruggestuurde pakjes die we bestellen via webshops zomaar kunnen gaan vernietigen.

Aan dit soort schandalige praktijken, collega鈥檚, gaan we eindelijk een einde maken. En dat is goed voor onze portefeuille, dat is goed voor het klimaat en dat is goed voor het milieu.

听听Silvia Sardone, a nome del gruppo ID. 鈥� Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, l'obiettivo del regolamento sulla progettazione ecocompatibile sarebbe quello di ridurre l'impatto ambientale dei prodotti durante il loro ciclo di vita ma, ancora una volta, finisce alla fine per imporre ulteriori oneri alle imprese e pone le basi per future nuove iniziative green, con pericoli importanti per le aziende.

Apprezziamo i riferimenti alle micro, piccole e medie imprese, ma abbiamo ancora molti dubbi su questa proposta. Uno, tra tutti, la mancata inclusione del riciclo tra le esenzioni nella definizione di distruzione, al pari praticamente di riuso e rifabbricazione.

Insomma, secondo la proposta il riciclo sarebbe una modalit脿 di distruzione del prodotto. Questa 猫 un'assurdit脿 che colpirebbe le aziende italiane di diversi settori che da anni investono nel riciclo 鈥� considerate che l'Italia 猫 prima al mondo nel riciclo 鈥� e lo riteniamo un paradosso.

In pratica per attaccare le aziende della moda low cost si colpiscono anche i brand di lusso: 猫 un paradosso che aziende come Armani, se hanno un abito invenduto, non possano distruggerlo ma non possano neanche riciclarlo. Dovrebbe smontare il mercato del lusso, che solo in Italia vale 17 miliardi di euro e il 78听% della moda di lusso 猫 made in Italy.

Abbiamo presentato un emendamento che introduce il requisito di informazioni sull'origine del prodotto, cos矛 che il made in Italy possa essere riconosciuto e quindi valorizzato come eccellenza, ma anche in questo caso la sinistra, ovviamente, sar脿 assolutamente contraria.

Noi abbiamo letto 130 pagine di regole e vincoli per le aziende. In pi霉, tra l'altro, in questo regolamento si decide di conferire il potere alla Commissione di introdurre ulteriori requisiti e obblighi attraverso atti delegati o atti legislativi specifici.

Noi rimaniamo contrari. Voi continuate a portare avanti regolamenti e proposte green che non salveranno il mondo, ma piuttosto renderanno meno competitiva l'Europa rispetto agli altri concorrenti. Non ne vale la pena.

听听Marina Mesure, au nom du groupe The Left. 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, c鈥檈st officiel, la terre ne suffit plus 脿 nous faire vivre. Dans deux semaines, ce sera le jour du d茅passement. Cette date 脿 partir de laquelle, chaque ann茅e, nous avons consomm茅 toutes les ressources que la Terre peut renouveler en un an. Une date qui, chaque ann茅e, avance inexorablement et nous rappelle que nos ressources ne sont pas in茅puisables.

Dans ce contexte, cette directive sur l鈥櫭ヽoconception, qui permet de rendre nos produits plus durables, r茅parables, recyclables d猫s leur conception, est primordiale. Elle interdit notamment l鈥檕bsolescence programm茅e, un fl茅au grotesque et absurde qui vise 脿 abandonner le progr猫s pour faire plus de profit et consommer davantage. Elle doit de la m锚me mani猫re interdire la destruction des invendus, aussi bien des textiles que des appareils 茅lectroniques. Tout cela pour b芒tir un cadre r茅glementaire dans lequel aucun produit n鈥檃tteint la d茅charge avant d鈥檃voir pu accomplir son plus haut niveau d鈥檜tilit茅.

Il y a urgence, car le retard que nous avons pris sur la r茅vision de ce r猫glement a caus茅 plus de 10听millions de tonnes d鈥櫭﹎issions de CO2 suppl茅mentaires chaque ann茅e. Donc, n鈥檃ttendons plus, votons ce texte et finissons-en avec le mythe de la croissance infinie dans un monde fini. Nos modes de consommation et de production doivent r茅pondre aux exigences environnementales pour pr茅server la survie de l鈥檋umanit茅.

听听Peter Liese (PPE). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Die 脰kodesign-Richtlinie ist eine Erfolgsgeschichte. Wir haben in den letzten Jahren j盲hrlich so viel Energie eingespart, wie Italien und Schweden gemeinsam verbrauchen. Wir haben damit das Klima gesch眉tzt, und wir haben damit daf眉r gesorgt, dass viele Verbraucherinnen und Verbraucher echtes Geld sparen. Jetzt geht es einen gro脽en Schritt weiter. Jetzt geht es nicht mehr nur um den Energieverbrauch, sondern auch um die Kreislaufwirtschaft, Ressourcenschonung, und ich unterst眉tze diesen Schritt. Ich bedanke mich bei allen, vor allen Dingen f眉r die EVP bei Jessica Polfj盲rd, dass Sie diesen Schritt jetzt erm枚glichen.

Aber wir m眉ssen wirklich aufpassen, dass wir uns dabei nicht verhaspeln. Es gibt einzelne Punkte, wo der Ausschuss noch 眉ber den Kommissionsvorschlag hinausgeht, z.听B. bei den besorgniserregenden Stoffen, und ich glaube, da m眉ssen wir vorsichtig sein. Deswegen unterst眉tze ich pers枚nlich die 脛nderungsantr盲ge听59 bis 61 und den 脛nderungsantrag听249, um hier Ma脽 und Mitte zu halten.

Es ist ja so, dass 脰kodesign einen gro脽en Charme hat, auch f眉r die Wirtschaft, weil da Regeln aufgestellt werden, nicht nur f眉r europ盲ische Produzenten, sondern auch f眉r Importeure. Aber das m眉ssen wir eben auch kontrollieren k枚nnen. Dabei m眉ssen wir uns fokussieren. Mein Appell an die Kommission, aber noch mehr an die Mitgliedstaaten: Passen wir auf, dass die Kontrolle funktioniert, sonst w盲re n盲mlich der Ehrliche der Dumme, und das darf nicht sein.

听听Beatrice Covassi (S&D). 鈥� Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, vale la pena essere qui stasera perch茅 la proposta di legge sulla progettazione ecocompatibile 猫 un importante passo in avanti verso un'economia circolare che renda sempre pi霉 sostenibili i prodotti messi in commercio in Europa.

Vogliamo prodotti pi霉 durevoli, riparabili, rinnovabili e riciclabili. Per questo fissiamo i requisiti per la loro progettazione, usando l'innovazione tecnologica per un design che favorisca riparazioni e recupero delle materie prime.

L'ecodesign porta vantaggi per i nostri cittadini, per l'ambiente, per l'economia, perch茅 progettare in modo sostenibile significa prevenire la produzione di rifiuti, ridurre l'impoverimento del pianeta causato dalla crescente estrazione di materie prime, creare un vantaggio competitivo per le nostre imprese riducendo i costi per materie prime ed energia.

Inoltre, garantendo la trasparenza sulle informazioni del prodotto, avremo come consumatori la possibilit脿 di conoscere l'impatto ambientale dei nostri acquisti e le imprese potranno promuovere la sostenibilit脿 nelle loro produzioni come vantaggio competitivo. Penso a settori come quello del tessile e della moda, che gi脿 ci stupiscono nelle punte pi霉 avanzate per creativit脿 e risultati, mostrando tutto il potenziale dell'ecodesign.

E allora, cari colleghi, chiudiamo tutti insieme il cerchio virtuoso dell'economia circolare!

听听Ivars Ijabs (Renew). 鈥� Priek拧s膿d膿t膩ja kungs! God膩tais komis膩ra kungs! D膩rgie kol膿模i! Viens no svar墨g膩kajiem 拧墨s regulas uzdevumiem ir nov膿rst da啪膩dus ra啪ot膩ju trikus, kas ir v膿rsti uz aizvien jaunu un jaunu produktu pirk拧anu. 艩ie te triki apzin膩ti padara produktus priek拧laic墨gi novecojo拧us vai nefunkcion膩lus, neremont膿jamus vai ar墨 remont膿jamus tikai 募oti ierobe啪ot膩 skait膩 pilnvarotu remontdarbn墨cu.

T膩p膿c l墨dz膩s ilgiztur墨bas pras墨b膩m visiem produktiem katrai precei ir j膩b奴t ar墨 remont膿jam墨bas r膩d墨t膩jiem, lai cilv膿ki var膿tu izdar墨t apzin膩tu izv膿li, kad vi艈i tos ieg膩d膩jas. Ir j膩nov膿r拧 ar墨 pieaugo拧膩 nerealiz膿tu produktu, piem膿ram, tekstilizstr膩d膩jumu, apavu, elektronikas, izn墨cin膩拧ana, kas pieaug tie拧i ar tie拧saites tirdzniec墨bu. Ra啪ot膩ji vienk膩r拧i izn墨cina atpaka募 nos奴t墨tos pirkumus, un t膩d膩 veid膩 notiek piln墨gi bezj膿dz墨ga resursu iz拧姆膿rd膿拧ana.

艩膩dai te praksei ir vienk膩r拧i j膩pieliek punkts, un tas ir m奴su uzdevums. Un, protams, vis膩s 拧aj膩s pras墨b膩s ir j膩艈em v膿r膩 ar墨 mazo, vid膿jo uz艈膿mumu intereses 鈥� vi艈u sp膿jas t膩s 墨stenot, kas bie啪i vien krietni vien at拧姆iras no glob膩lo komp膩niju iesp膿j膩m.

听听Malte Gall茅e (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, lieber Marc, lieber Herr Kommissar, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! In nicht mal mehr einem Jahr ist schon wieder Europawahl, und wir alle werden die ganzen Wochen davor in den Stra脽en stehen, uns mit Leuten unterhalten, und immer wieder wird die Frage kommen: Ja, was macht die EU eigentlich? Ich werde mich dann ganz entspannt hinstellen und werde fragen: Ja, haben Sie denn vor, in den n盲chsten Jahren etwas zu kaufen? Ich nehme an, die Antwort wird ja sein, und dann k枚nnen wir alle ganz entspannt sagen: Ja, und genau diese Produkte, die Sie dann kaufen werden, die werden dank der neuen 脰kodesign-Verordnung l盲nger halten, nicht so schnell zu M眉ll werden, man wird sie recyceln k枚nnen, man wird sie wieder reparieren k枚nnen.

Wir geben die Macht zur眉ck in die H盲nde der Verbraucherinnen und Verbraucher. Und das ist einfach ein riesengro脽er Erfolg unserer Europ盲ischen Union. Vielen lieben Dank an Sie, lieber Herr Kommissar, dass Sie das vorgeschlagen haben.

Eine kleine Bitte habe ich aber tats盲chlich: Kollege Liese hat es angemerkt, wir m眉ssen nat眉rlich auch daf眉r sorgen, dass die ganzen Produkte, die importiert werden, auch die Regeln befolgen. Und da m眉ssen wir nat眉rlich die Onlineplattformen in die Pflicht nehmen, denn wenn Alibaba und Amazon usw. nicht zur Rechenschaft gezogen werden, dann ist das ein riesengro脽es Schlupfloch. Und das wollen Sie selber auch nicht.

听听Se谩n Kelly (PPE). 鈥� A Uachtar谩in, Commissioner, the main objective of the ecodesign framework is to reduce the negative life cycle environmental impacts of products, introduce circularity and improve the functioning of the internal market. To ensure the effectiveness of the framework, it should primarily focus on the environmental aspects of sustainability pertaining to physical products.

While setting ecodesign requirements for products is vital, we must also direct our attention towards increasing the development of collection, sorting, repair and recirculation systems. By bolstering these systems, we can foster a circular economy that minimises waste and maximises resource鈥攅fficiency. The holistic approach encompassing the entire product life cycle will be instrumental in achieving our sustainability goals.

Minimising divergence in the implementation of this policy will not only strengthen our collective impact, but also prevent fragmentation within the internal market. It makes sense to address the products with the highest negative impacts first. This approach ensures that our efforts yield the maximum positive outcome for the environment.

Regarding the prohibition of the destruction of unsold consumer goods, I agree with the general principle. However, before we include bans on the destruction of specific product types, we must gather more comprehensive product data.

听听Anna Cavazzini (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Wie umweltsch盲dlich ein Produkt ist, das entscheidet sich zu 80听% am Design, und das ist ein riesiger Hebel, den wir einfach noch viel mehr nutzen m眉ssen. T-Shirt, Handy oder Wasserkocher听鈥� bisher: kaufen, kurz nutzen und wegschmei脽en, das ist leider die Regel. Und mit krassen Folgen: Die Erderhitzung schreitet voran, der Hunger nach Ressourcen steigt immer weiter, die M眉llberge wachsen. Damit muss endlich Schluss sein! Mit der Abstimmung 眉ber die 脰kodesign-Verordnung machen wir klar: Es ist h枚chste Zeit, dass die Nachhaltigkeit von Produkten auf dem Binnenmarkt zur Norm wird.

脰kodesign ist ein Meilenstein im 脺bergang zur Kreislaufwirtschaft. M眉ll wird zum Designfehler, und Schrottprodukte verschwinden vom Markt. Ich freue mich, dass wir mit dem Produktpass Transparenz 眉ber die Lieferkette schaffen und das Recycling erleichtern. Und ein Reparierbarkeitswert wird Verbraucherinnen und Verbrauchern deutlich zeigen, wie leicht oder wie schwer ein Produkt zu reparieren ist. Auch muss das Zerst枚ren von unverkaufter Ware endlich aufh枚ren. Es ist gut und richtig, dass das Parlament den Kommissionsvorschlag nachgesch盲rft hat.

听听Virginijus Sinkevi膷ius, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Mr President, honourable Members, thank you for your contributions today. This evening鈥檚 debate is a testament to your ongoing engagement with this legislative proposal for which we need a strong collective effort. And as I have already pointed out, a significant amount of work remains to be done. So I am therefore looking forward for tomorrow鈥檚 plenary vote. It is the next key link in the chain and I encourage you to use it as an opportunity to secure a strong mandate for entering trilogues.

Let me reply to some of the key issues that you have mentioned. First of all, a few times there were mentioned SMEs. Article 19 of proposal provides for Commission and Member States鈥� action to specifically guide and support SMEs in the implementation of ESPR measures. Commission programmes benefiting SMEs will take into account specific initiatives targeted at SMEs, integrating sustainability aspects into their value chains, and the Commission will also publish specific guidelines for facilitating compliance to ESPR requirements by SMEs. So Member States will have to provide one鈥攕top鈥攕hops for awareness鈥攔aising and networking to facilitate adaptation to ESPR requirements by SMEs and they could adopt additional measures from financial support to training and technical assistance.

Substances of concern 鈥� they were mentioned. The chemical composition of products determines largely their functionalities and impacts, including the possibilities for re-use or recovery when they become waste. So information on the presence of substances of concern in products is therefore a key element of the proposal. So legal clarity and coherence with existing legislation, including on chemicals, have been a priority for the Commission. The proposal was carefully prepared to avoid overlaps with existing chemicals. Legislation and definition is aligned with the chemicals strategy for sustainability, according to which substances of concern are substances having a chronic effect on human health or the environment, but also those which hamper recycling for safe and high鈥攓uality secondary raw materials. So any changes to the definition will run counter to the strategies鈥� objectives.

As regards a direct ban on the destruction of textiles, footwear and electronics, I understand that 合法博彩网站 very much supports this idea. I understand that the idea 鈥� because destruction is clearly not in line with the circular economy principles. So a directly applicable prohibition on the destruction of textiles or any other product groups was not part of the Commission proposal because we did not have a detailed overview of the actual number of unsold consumer products being destroyed. So whether this prohibition is introduced directly based on the currently available evidence, or at a later stage after the further impact assessment and based on the information that business operators will be obliged to disclose under this proposal, the Commission is ready to prioritise work on this, also in line with the commitment under the textiles strategy to prohibit the destruction of unsold textile products.

As regards the market鈥攕urveillance authorities in the ESPR, so especially talking about the online marketplaces, in addition to the generic obligation of cooperation under the Market Surveillance Regulation, ESPR contains more specific obligations like to establish a regular and structured exchange of information to allow online tools of market surveillance authorities to access their interfaces and allow for scrapping data. Having only generic obligation to cooperate without any further specifications would reduce clarity on the concrete activities that providers of online marketplaces have to carry out for products that are subject to ESPR requirements. And this aligns with the logic that was followed by the General Product Safety Regulation and accepted by the legislators.

Finally, as regards the competitiveness, and of course the products that are going to be imported in the EU, the rules proposed under ESPR will apply to all products placed on the EU market, whether products manufactured inside the EU or outside the EU, ESPR will contribute to the EU鈥檚 long鈥攖erm competitiveness and strategic autonomy. The decoupling of economic development from natural resource use and reduction of material dependencies will foster the EU鈥檚 resilience.

Honourable Members, what we have on the table is a future鈥攐riented framework, a real game changer. The new Ecodesign Regulation will be a key instrument for achieving our environmental, climate and energy goals and for ensuring the functioning of the single market for sustainable products. So we cannot afford to lose time. Work on the ESPR framework needs to begin as soon as possible so that concrete progress on making sustainable products the norm in the EU can begin.

So I am confident that thanks to the ambition and commitment of the rapporteur Ms听Moretti and all of those closely involved, excellent progress on making sustainable products the norm can be soon made.

听听Alessandra Moretti, relatrice. 鈥� Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, voglio davvero ringraziare tutti i colleghi per il supporto, per il contributo e per le proposte che hanno migliorato il testo iniziale.

Questo 猫 stato un lavoro di squadra, 猫 un lavoro che ci ha visti, seppur nelle differenze legittime, uniti nel proposito di offrire al mercato e ai consumatori un regolamento ambizioso che mette al centro l'ambiente, la tutela degli ecosistemi, la salute dei consumatori.

脠 un passo importante che dimostra che, se c'猫 la volont脿, la politica pu貌 essere all'altezza delle sfide e della responsabilit脿 che i cittadini ci hanno affidato.

Io sono molto fiduciosa che domani lo dimostreremo appieno.

听听President. 鈥� The debate is closed.

The vote will take place tomorrow.