合法博彩网站

Question for oral answer O-000106/2015
to the Council
Rule 128
Claude Moraes,聽on behalf of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs

Commissioner Avramopoulos announced on 3 December 2014 that the Commission鈥檚 Smart Borders Package proposals of 2013 would be withdrawn and replaced by new proposals at the end of 2015 or the beginning of 2016.

Does the Council consider the envisaged entry/exit system and registered traveller programme to be appropriate and adequate responses to the current and future situation at the EU鈥檚 external border, given the constant increase in the number of border crossings and, if so, why?

Does the Council consider the envisaged entry/exit system to be an appropriate instrument for reducing the number of so-called 鈥榦verstayers鈥� and, if so, why?

What are the Council鈥檚 views as regards access for law enforcement purposes?

What are the Council鈥檚 views as to their intended purposes?

Could the Council outline its thoughts on the systems as regards the architecture, biometric identifiers and data retention periods?

To what extent may the European Court of Justice鈥檚 ruling on data retention impact the proposals as they stand?

What is the Council鈥檚 view regarding upgrading the existing tools to achieve the intended objectives of the entry/exit system and the registered traveller programme and regarding the interoperability and compatibility of various IT systems that already exist with regard to the Smart Borders package?

What is the Council鈥檚 view on the costs of the Smart Borders Package, in particular those that are not (fully) covered by the Internal Security Fund?