Documente - Think Tank - Parlamentul European

Studiu - Le principe de protection de l'environnement, une perspective de droit comparé: France - 25-04-2025

Thu, 24 Apr 2025 22:00:00 GMT

Ce document s’intègre dans une série d’études qui, avec une perspective de droit comparé, visent à faire une présentation du principe de protection de l’environnement dans différents ordres juridiques. Après avoir expliqué le droit positif et la jurisprudence d’application, le contenu, les limites et la possible évolution de ce principe sont examinés. La présente étude a pour objet le cas de la France. L’introduction de la Charte de l’environnemment dans la Constitution de 1958, il y a désormais vingt ans, a constitué une avancée remarquable. La Charte, intégrée au bloc de constitutionnalité, garantit des droits environnementaux tels que le droit à un environnement équilibré (article 1er), le principe de précaution (article 5) ou encore le droit de participation et le droit à l’information (article 7). Bien que la Charte confère des droits, leur mise en œuvre dépend de dispositions législatives spécifiques. Cela crée une tension entre l’objectif de protection environnementale et la justiciabilité limitée.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2025 - PE

Briefing - �Ϸ��վ in EU external action - 01-04-2025

Mon, 31 Mar 2025 22:00:00 GMT

Based on its Treaties, the European Union (EU) has developed a multifaceted external action policy, and is seen as an important actor far beyond its borders. Through its institutions and Member States, the EU is active in international trade, humanitarian assistance, economic, financial, and technical and development cooperation, as well as through its common foreign and security policy (CFSP) and common security and defence policy (CSDP). Increasingly, the external dimension of internal EU policies has also grown, notably in the economic, climate, energy, migration and digital fields. The role of the European �Ϸ��վ in the EU's external action has increased significantly since the 1990s, and especially after the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon (2009). Although �Ϸ��վ's powers remain relatively limited compared to other EU institutions involved in external action, especially with regard to CFSP and CSDP decision-making (which remain mostly intergovernmental), it nevertheless has considerable legislative, budgetary, agenda-setting and soft powers. Several of �Ϸ��վ's powers cut across all policy areas. Notably, it proactively supports multilateralism and conducts extensive parliamentary diplomacy. �Ϸ��վ contributes to policy framing through its debates, resolutions, recommendations, own-initiative reports and statements. It holds hearings, workshops, debates and organises missions. Members of the �Ϸ��վ exercise scrutiny of the executive, by holding hearings of and posing questions to the European Commission, the European External Action Service (EEAS), the EU's High Representative and the Council. �Ϸ��վ co-legislates on financing the EU's external action and controls EU institutions' expenditure, including the EEAS, through the discharge procedure. The �Ϸ��վ acts on an equal footing with the Council when adopting numerous acts in the fields of trade, development and humanitarian aid, and often external dimensions of internal policies. Since 2009, �Ϸ��վ's consent to legally binding international agreements is mandated by the Treaties.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2025 - PE

Studiu - El principio de protección del Medio Ambiente, una perspectiva de Derecho Comparado: México - 31-03-2025

Mon, 31 Mar 2025 12:05:29 GMT

Este documento se integra en una serie de estudios que, desde una perspectiva de Derecho Comparado, tienen como objeto analizar el principio de protección del Medio Ambiente en diferentes ordenamientos jurídicos. Tras la explicación de la normativa y la jurisprudencia de aplicación, se examinan el contenido, los límites y la posible evolución de dicho concepto. El presente estudio tiene por objeto el caso de México. La protección del Medio Ambiente sano está consagrada en México a nivel constitucional como un auténtico derecho fundamental (artículo 4), a la vez que se contiene como un principio rector de la política pública, basado en el desarrollo integral y sustentable (artículo 25). Esta proyección bidimensional busca que el desarrollo nacional no sea en detrimento de la naturaleza. Fruto de los movimientos ambientalistas a nivel internacional de los años 70, el derecho a un Medio Ambiente sano, así como el principio rector como política pública de desarrollo integral y sustentable, han forjado progresivamente un amplio acervo normativo (a nivel nacional y en las treinta y dos entidades federativas), así como doctrinal y jurisprudencial, que reconoce al ambiente como merecedor de protección, tanto por su valor en sí mismo, como por la importancia que tiene para la vida humana y el desarrollo. Sin embargo, este derecho humano enfrenta actualmente múltiples desafíos en materia de acceso a la justicia y acceso a la información, así como retos impostergables derivados de la crisis climática, motivo por el cual se ve comprometido el efecto útil que puede tener el derecho al Medio Ambiente sano, tanto para las generaciones presentes como futuras.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2025 - PE

Pe scurt - Human rights and democracy in the world: Assessing EU action in 2023 - 26-03-2025

Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:06:43 GMT

The latest annual report from the EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on EU external action to promote human rights and democracy covers 2023. It highlights a worsening environment marked by multiple crises and conflicts, growing social inequalities, and increasing pressure on multilateral governance and rules-based international cooperation. During its April plenary session, the European �Ϸ��վ is due to vote on its own yearly resolution on human rights and democracy in the world, responding to the High Representative's report and recommending future EU action.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2025 - PE

Studiu - El principio de protección del Medio Ambiente, una perspectiva de Derecho Comparado: España - 27-02-2025

Wed, 26 Feb 2025 23:00:00 GMT

Este documento se integra en una serie de estudios que, desde una perpectiva de Derecho Comparado, tienen como objeto analizar el principio de protección del Medio Ambiente en diferentes ordenamientos jurídicos. Tras la explicación de la normativa y la jurisprudencia de aplicación, se examinan el contenido, los límites y la posible evolución de dicho concepto. El presente estudio tiene por objeto el caso de España. El análisis parte de la consagración constitucional del principio de protección del Medio Ambiente a través del artículo 45 de la Constitución de 1978. Tras el examen de los debates constituyentes se pasa al estudio de los avances normativos experimentados en los ámbitos estatal y autonómico, con la adicional descripción de la jurisprudencia constitucional más relevante en la materia. Se concluye con el estudio de los principios fundamentales que sustentan la protección medioambiental y un balance final en el que se destacan importantes logros normativos y ciertas áreas de mejora.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2025 - PE

Studiu - Le principe de protection de l'environnement, une perspective de droit comparé: Union européenne - 29-01-2025

Tue, 28 Jan 2025 23:00:00 GMT

Ce document s’intègre dans une série d’études qui, avec une perspective de droit comparé, visent à faire une présentation du principe de protection de l'environnement dans différents ordres juridiques. Après avoir expliqué le droit positif et la jurisprudence d’application, le contenu, les limites et la possible évolution de ce principe sont examinés. La présente étude a pour objet le cas de l’Union européenne. Le principe est garanti par une série de dispositions des traités et l’article 37 de la Charte des droits fondamentaux. Il est mis en œuvre par un arsenal quantitativement et qualitativement très important de normes et réglementations qui font l’objet d’une abondante jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne sur l’interprétation et l’application de ce droit dérivé. L’étude approfondit de manière critique les composantes du principe et la façon dont celui-ci se combine avec d’autres principes ou droits.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2025 - PE

Briefing - Commitments made at the confirmation hearings of the Commissioners-designate 2024-2029 - 10-01-2025

Thu, 09 Jan 2025 23:00:00 GMT

Commitments made at the confirmation hearings of the Commissioners-designate 2024-2029

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2025 - PE

Analiză aprofundată - Ten issues to watch in 2025 - 07-01-2025

Tue, 07 Jan 2025 19:24:01 GMT

This is the ninth edition of an annual EPRS publication aimed at identifying and framing some of the key issues and policy areas that have the potential to feature prominently in public debate and on the political agenda of the European Union over the coming year. The topics analysed encompass economic productivity, the 2040 climate target, economic security, investment capacity, the EU's future finances, electric vehicles, competitiveness in artificial intelligence, European defence, migrant return policy, and trust within the public sphere.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2025 - PE

Studiu - Towards a Climate and Energy Union - The constitutional basis for a sustainable transformation - 12-12-2024

Wed, 11 Dec 2024 23:00:00 GMT

This study, commissioned by the European �Ϸ��վ’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the AFCO Committee, considers the legal space for an EU Climate and Energy Union. It assesses the major limits at the EU and national level, as well as the question if (informal) Treaty change is possible and necessary to create the space needed. It also assesses if an individual right to clean energy exists, or can and should be legally construed. It pays special attention to the challenge of funding and the role that the emerging principle of solidarity might play.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2024 - PE

Pe scurt - Laureates of the 2024 Sakharov Prize: María Corina Machado and Edmundo González Urrutia, fighting for democracy in Venezuela - 03-12-2024

Tue, 03 Dec 2024 09:44:08 GMT

Respect for fundamental freedoms and human rights is a core value of the European Union (EU), and one that is promoted through its policies. �Ϸ��վ's Sakharov Prize honours the work of people who stand up for these freedoms and rights. This year's Sakharov Prize is to be awarded to María Corina Machado, leader of Venezuela's democratic forces, and President-elect Edmundo González Urrutia. They represent all Venezuelans both inside and outside the country who are fighting to restore freedom and democracy. The Sakharov Prize award ceremony will take place during the European �Ϸ��վ's December plenary session.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2024 - PE

Briefing - Accelerating progress on Sustainable Development Goal 5 (SDG 5): Achieving gender equality and empowering women and girls - 18-09-2024

Wed, 18 Sep 2024 09:01:59 GMT

Sustainable Development Goal 5 (SDG 5) – 'achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls' – is one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) set by the United Nations (UN) that is very likely to be missed by the target date of 2030. This undermines the rest of the goals. The inclusion in the SDGs of a standalone goal on gender equality was seen as a spur to mobilise action and resources to tackle persistent barriers to women and girls' full enjoyment of their rights, which also undermine sustainable development. The targets in SDG 5 specify actions or outcomes that countries should aim for. These are to remove discriminatory legislation and social norms, eliminate gender-based violence, ensure the bodily autonomy of women and girls, value their unpaid care work and close gender gaps in access to resources and decision-making. At the mid-point to 2030, no country or region in the world has achieved all these targets. Already slow, global progress has stalled, prompting evaluation of which policy measures have been effective, where gaps exist and how to catalyse further action. The European Union (EU) supported the inclusion of SDG 5 and has comprehensive policy frameworks in place to support non-EU countries to achieve the targets and to advance gender equality in the Union. In the EU itself, many of the targets are on track, but progress has been uneven, with significant disparities between Member States. �Ϸ��վ has taken a strong stance on putting gender equality at the heart of sustainable development policy and has called for concrete steps to accelerate progress towards SDG 5.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2024 - PE

Briefing - Women's rights in Afghanistan: An ongoing battle - 16-09-2024

Sun, 15 Sep 2024 22:00:00 GMT

Since the Taliban regime overtook the country in mid-August 2021, Afghanistan's record on women's rights has been one of the worst, if not the worst, in the world. Despite promises to 'uphold women's rights in line with Sharia law', the Taliban have suppressed the rights of their citizens, with women the main target of restrictions. As well as prohibiting women and girls from travelling without a male relative, the Taliban have denied them post-primary education, banned them from numerous public places, and restricted their employment to healthcare and primary education. In December 2022, women were banned from working for non-governmental organisations in most sectors. In April 2023, the ban was extended to include Afghan women working for the United Nations mission in the country. In August 2024, the Taliban published a law codifying existing norms and introducing new ones, including a prohibition on women's voices being heard in public. This crackdown on women's rights has attracted considerable international condemnation, including from Muslim states. In response to the regressive policies, many international donors have reduced or threatened to halt their humanitarian assistance, upon which the country is strongly reliant. It is feared that women could, unintentionally, be the worst affected by this reduction or suspension of humanitarian aid. The Taliban nevertheless appears inflexible, leaving international actors with a dilemma as to how to proceed. The European Union (EU) has been engaged in Afghanistan since the mid-1980s and has prioritised the advancement of Afghan women's rights. While changing its terms of engagement, it has continued to provide humanitarian aid and to support civil society. �Ϸ��վ has followed the situation closely and recommended further action to support Afghan women and girls. This briefing analyses the current situation of women's rights in Afghanistan, taking a long view. Women's rights have been an intense battleground between different actors for over a century, with periods of promising reforms followed by resistance and often reversals of progress. This helps to explain how a country where women won voting rights in 1919 – earlier than in most of the Western world – has ended up treating its female population in a manner that possibly amounts to a crime against humanity. This briefing updates an earlier one written by the same authors in April 2023.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2024 - PE

Fișe descriptive despre U.E. - Politica în domeniul azilului - 09-09-2024

Sun, 30 Jun 2019 22:00:00 GMT

Obiectivul politicii Uniunii în domeniul azilului este de a acorda statutul corespunzător oricărui resortisant al unei țări terțe care solicită protecție internațională în unul dintre statele sale membre, precum și de a asigura respectarea principiului nereturnării[1]. În acest scop, Uniunea face eforturi pentru a crea un sistem european comun de azil.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2024 - PE

Studiu - Libertad de empresa, una perspectiva de Derecho Comparado – Argentina - 04-09-2024

Wed, 04 Sep 2024 13:35:56 GMT

Este documento se integra en una serie de estudios que, desde una perspectiva de Derecho Comparado, tienen como objeto analizar la libertad de empresa en diferentes ordenamientos jurídicos. Tras una breve introducción histórica, así como la explicación de la normativa y la jurisprudencia de aplicación, se examinan el contenido, los límites y la posible evolución de tal libertad. El presente estudio tiene por objeto el caso de Argentina. La libertad de empresa es reconocida por Constitución Argentina como derecho fundamental, bajo la fórmula de “libertad de industria y comercio” (art.14). La matriz de económica reposa sobre la libertad de empresa como proveedora de bienes y servicios a la sociedad y atribuye al Estado facultades de promoción y gestión (art.75 incisos 18 y 19), de regulación del comercio internacional e interprovincial (art. 75 inc. 13) y de defensa de la competencia de los mercados (art. 42). En el ordenamiento federal argentino la regulación legislativa de la libertad de empresa compete principalmente al Estado nacional mientras a los Estados provinciales corresponde la aplicación y operatividad dentro de su territorio, pudiendo complementar con normas locales que no contravengan las normas federales. Esos concisos parámetros constitucionales permitieron diversas modulaciones económicas a lo largo de los siglos XX y XXI que se ven reflejadas en la voluminosa legislación nacional y provincial.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2024 - PE

Briefing - �Ϸ��վ and the United Nations - 03-09-2024

Mon, 02 Sep 2024 22:00:00 GMT

The EU has constantly affirmed its support for multilateralism, and in particular for the United Nations (UN), with which it shares core values. Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union puts respect for the principles of the UN Charter among the guiding principles of EU action on the international scene. The EU and its Member States contribute one third to the total UN budget. Although the EU's status within the UN system varies (from full member to simple observer), the EU is the regional organisation having gained the strongest voice in the UN. The EU supports the reform agenda initiated by UN Secretary-General António Guterres. �Ϸ��վ is a strong supporter of rules-based multilateralism. It follows the EU's activity in the UN closely, and regularly adopts recommendations to the Council of the EU on the priorities to be pursued by the EU at the UN General Assembly, and at major multilateral conferences such as the UN climate change conference. �Ϸ��վ also adopts resolutions on the implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals. It encourages cooperation between the EU – together with its Member States – and the UN, in particular on humanitarian aid, development assistance, peace operations and crisis management. As regards specific bodies and agencies, �Ϸ��վ regularly reiterates its strong support for the International Criminal Court, and deplores the abuse of multilateral institutions, in particular by regimes seeking to neutralise human rights mechanisms within the UN Human Rights Council. �Ϸ��վ's relevant committees maintain relations with UN bodies and agencies. The committees invite UN representatives and experts to exchanges of views and hearings at the European �Ϸ��վ, and send delegations to key meetings.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2024 - PE

Studiu - The protection of mental privacy in the area of neuroscience - Societal, legal and ethical challenges - 24-07-2024

Wed, 24 Jul 2024 15:45:56 GMT

Advances in (neuro)technological development have led to an increase in the use and accessibility of neurotechnologies (NT), allowing brain activity to be recorded, analysed and manipulated by neurotechnological devices. While they were originally used only for clinical purposes, they are becoming more and more attractive for healthy populations willing to enhance their cognitive or physical abilities. Consumer-grade devices can be acquired and used by lay persons without supervision in work, education and entertainment environments. This state of affairs raises a multitude of open questions and the possibility of threats to data security and privacy, as well as neuropsychological, ethical and societal implications. As a result, the Neurorights Foundation (NRF) was formed in 2017 to investigate and discuss these questions and make them visible to the public. This study addresses the NRF's claims and suggestions and evaluates the need for their proposed 'neurorights'. Disciplinary evaluations of the issues at stake are followed by recommendations and policy options.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2024 - PE

Studiu - La libertà di impresa, una prospettiva di diritto comparato - Italia - 17-07-2024

Tue, 16 Jul 2024 22:00:00 GMT

Questo studio fa parte di un progetto più ampio, il cui scopo è quello di analizzare, nella prospettiva del diritto comparato, la libertà d'impresa in diversi ordinamenti giuridici. Dopo una breve introduzione storica, nonché la spiegazione della normativa e della giurisprudenza applicabili, vengono esaminati il contenuto, i limiti e la possibile evoluzione di tale libertà. Il presente studio è dedicato alla libertà di impresa nell'ordinamento giuridico italiano. Una prima parte dello studio sarà dedicata all’affermazione del diritto alla libertà di impresa e all’approfondimento della portata semantica di tale locuzione rispetto a quella di libertà di iniziativa economica sancita dalla Costituzione. Verranno in particolare messi in luce i limiti imposti all’esercizio della libertà di impresa dall’esigenza di contemperare altri interessi, prevalentemente di rilevanza pubblicistica, ritenuti meritevoli di maggior tutela, definendo i margini di intervento pubblico che possono comprimerne l’esercizio. Seguirà l’individuazione e l’esegesi delle fonti normative che contemplano, attraverso un’articolazione puntuale, le modalità di esercizio del diritto alla libertà di impresa, nonché una selezione delle principali pronunce della Corte costituzionale, della Corte di Cassazione, dal Consiglio di Stato, nonché dei giudici di merito, che ne hanno definito e delimitato la portata in sede di interpretazione giurisprudenziale. Un’ultima parte dell’indagine sarà poi rivolta all’individuazione delle sfide che l’esercizio del diritto della libertà di impresa pone all’ordinamento giuridico, con particolare attenzione alle tematiche connesse alle diverse possibili concezioni del diritto alla libertà di impresa e ai margini di intervento pubblico in economia rispetto a un approccio ispirato a un più caratterizzato liberismo economico. In conclusione verranno formulate alcune considerazioni di sintesi e delineate eventuali prospettive de jure condendo.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2024 - PE

Studiu - La liberté d'entreprise, une perspective de droit comparé – Belgique - 12-07-2024

Thu, 11 Jul 2024 22:00:00 GMT

Fișe descriptive despre U.E. - Politica în domeniul imigrației - 10-07-2024

Sun, 30 Jun 2019 22:00:00 GMT

Unul dintre obiectivele majore ale Uniunii Europene este o politică europeană cuprinzătoare în materie de imigrație, orientată spre viitor și bazată pe solidaritate. Politica în domeniul imigrației urmărește materializarea unei abordări echilibrate atât asupra imigrației legale, cât și a celei clandestine.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2024 - PE

Pe scurt - Busolă pentru verificarea veridicității informațiilor: cum putem afla dacă informațiile au fost manipulate - 09-07-2024

Mon, 08 Jul 2024 22:00:00 GMT

Informațiile înșelătoare ne deruta pe oricare. Atât informarea greșită, adică greșelile comise fără intenție, cât și dezinformarea, care este concepută și răspândită cu scopul de a induce oamenii în eroare, pot să îngreuneze luarea unor decizii în cunoștință de cauză. Tehnologiile în evoluție rapidă inclusiv materialele video și audio deepfake – fac conținuturile înșelătoare prea ușor de produs și de răspândit. Pe mulți ne îngrijorează efectele acestui lucru: circa 85 % din oamenii din întreaga lume sunt îngrijorați de impactul dezinformării asupra concetățenilor lor; 87 % din oameni consideră că dezinformarea a afectat deja viața politică din țara lor, iar 38 % dintre cetățenii UE declară că informațiile false și/sau înșelătoare reprezintă o amenințare la adresa democrației. Aceste sfaturi vă vor ajuta să recunoașteți știrile false.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2024 - PE

Studiu - Freedom to Conduct a Business, a Comparative Law Perspective - United States of America - 03-07-2024

Tue, 02 Jul 2024 22:00:00 GMT

This document is part of a series of Comparative Law studies that analyze the freedom to conduct a business in different legal orders around the world. After a brief historic introduction and a presentation of applicable legislation and case law, the content, limits and possible evolution of this freedom are examined. The subject of this study is the United States’ federal legal system. The United States’ Constitution does not grant an express right to freely conduct or operate a business. To the contrary, the Constitution expressly grants the federal Congress power to regulate interstate commerce. In addition, per the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution, the states can regulate businesses under their inherent police power to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of their inhabitants. Although early Supreme Court precedent recognized an “economic property right” that merited constitutional protection from government interference, the Supreme Court’s position significantly changed in the 1930s during the New Deal expansion of federal regulation and intervention in the national economy. In the modern era, the Supreme Court has consistently ruled that the federal and state governments have a broad power to regulate businesses to serve any legitimate purpose so long as the legislation or regulations have a rational basis connected to that purpose.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2024 - PE

Studiu - Freedom to conduct a business, a comparative law perspective – Canada - 28-06-2024

Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:59:47 GMT

This document is part of a series of Comparative Law studies that analyze the freedom to conduct a business in different legal orders around the world. After a brief historic introduction and a presentation of applicable legislation and case law, the content, limits and possible evolution of this freedom are examined. The subject of this study is Canada’s federal legal system. While the freedom to conduct a business is a common law right, it does not possess supralegislative status. Nevertheless, various constitutional rules — including those arising from Canada’s federal structure and from the Charter of Rights — afford a degree of protection to businesses and to business activities. The study notes the pervasive influence of federalism on business regulation in Canada. The rules allocating responsibility between the �Ϸ��վ and the provinces do not affect only the level of government at which regulatory laws are enacted, but also affect the form and content of those laws.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2024 - PE

Fișe descriptive despre U.E. - Gestionarea frontierelor externe - 25-06-2024

Sun, 30 Jun 2019 22:00:00 GMT

Politica UE de gestionare a frontierelor a fost nevoită să se adapteze la evoluții importante, cum ar fi sosirea unui număr fără precedent de refugiați și migranți în situație neregulamentară și, de la mijlocul anului 2015, au ieșit la iveală mai multe deficiențe în politicile UE privind frontierele externe și migrația. Provocările legate de creșterea fluxurilor de migrație mixtă în UE, de pandemia de COVID-19 și de preocupările crescute în materie de securitate au declanșat o nouă perioadă de activitate în domeniul protejării frontierelor externe ale UE, care are, de asemenea, efecte asupra frontierelor sale interne.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2024 - PE

Studiu - La liberté d'entreprise, une perspective de droit comparé – Suisse - 21-06-2024

Thu, 20 Jun 2024 22:00:00 GMT

Ce document s’intègre dans une série d’études qui, avec une perspective de droit comparé, visent à faire une présentation de la liberté d’entreprise dans différents ordres juridiques. Après avoir expliqué le droit positif et la jurisprudence d’application, le contenu, les limites et la possible évolution de cette liberté sont examinés. La présente étude a pour objet le cas de la Suisse. La liberté d’entreprise n’est pas expressément garantie en Suisse. Ni la jurisprudence ni la doctrine n’utilisent cette terminologie. La liberté du commerce et de l’industrie, puis la liberté économique sont les libertés pertinentes dans le contexte helvétique. La Constitution fédérale du 18 avril 1999 garantit la liberté économique, laquelle englobe la liberté d’entreprise. Ainsi, le Tribunal fédéral a rendu plusieurs arrêts de principe protégeant diverses composantes de cette dernière. La place des entreprises dans l’économie est prise en compte et protégée non seulement par le droit constitutionnel, mais aussi par le droit infra-constitutionnel. La liberté d’entreprise est confrontée à de nombreux défis. Si elle est protégée en Suisse, elle subit néanmoins de nombreuses restrictions. La plupart des domaines du droit suisse sont pertinents à cet égard et forment un cadre au sein duquel est exercée et peut se développer la liberté d’entreprise.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2024 - PE

Fișe descriptive despre U.E. - Drepturile omului - 31-05-2024

Sun, 26 May 2019 22:00:00 GMT

Uniunea Europeană se angajează să susțină democrația și drepturile omului în relațiile sale externe, în conformitate cu principiile libertății, democrației, respectării drepturilor omului, a libertăților fundamentale și a statului de drept. UE urmărește să integreze preocupările legate de drepturile omului în toate politicile și programele sale și dispune de diferite instrumente politice în acest domeniu, pentru acțiuni specifice - inclusiv finanțarea proiectelor specifice prin intermediul instrumentelor sale financiare.

Sursa : © Uniunea Europeană, 2024 - PE

Documente - Think Tank - Parlamentul European

Studiu - Le principe de protection de l'environnement, une perspective de droit comparé: France - 25-04-2025

Briefing - �Ϸ�������վ in EU external action - 01-04-2025

Studiu - El principio de protección del Medio Ambiente, una perspectiva de Derecho Comparado: México - 31-03-2025

Pe scurt - Human rights and democracy in the world: Assessing EU action in 2023 - 26-03-2025

Studiu - El principio de protección del Medio Ambiente, una perspectiva de Derecho Comparado: España - 27-02-2025

Studiu - Le principe de protection de l'environnement, une perspective de droit comparé: Union européenne - 29-01-2025

Briefing - Commitments made at the confirmation hearings of the Commissioners-designate 2024-2029 - 10-01-2025

Analiză aprofundată - Ten issues to watch in 2025 - 07-01-2025

Studiu - Towards a Climate and Energy Union - The constitutional basis for a sustainable transformation - 12-12-2024

Pe scurt - Laureates of the 2024 Sakharov Prize: María Corina Machado and Edmundo González Urrutia, fighting for democracy in Venezuela - 03-12-2024

Briefing - Accelerating progress on Sustainable Development Goal 5 (SDG 5): Achieving gender equality and empowering women and girls - 18-09-2024

Briefing - Women's rights in Afghanistan: An ongoing battle - 16-09-2024

Fișe descriptive despre U.E. - Politica în domeniul azilului - 09-09-2024

Studiu - Libertad de empresa, una perspectiva de Derecho Comparado – Argentina - 04-09-2024

Briefing - �Ϸ�������վ and the United Nations - 03-09-2024

Studiu - The protection of mental privacy in the area of neuroscience - Societal, legal and ethical challenges - 24-07-2024

Studiu - La libertà di impresa, una prospettiva di diritto comparato - Italia - 17-07-2024

Studiu - La liberté d'entreprise, une perspective de droit comparé – Belgique - 12-07-2024

Fișe descriptive despre U.E. - Politica în domeniul imigrației - 10-07-2024

Pe scurt - Busolă pentru verificarea veridicității informațiilor: cum putem afla dacă informațiile au fost manipulate - 09-07-2024

Studiu - Freedom to Conduct a Business, a Comparative Law Perspective - United States of America - 03-07-2024

Studiu - Freedom to conduct a business, a comparative law perspective – Canada - 28-06-2024

Fișe descriptive despre U.E. - Gestionarea frontierelor externe - 25-06-2024

Studiu - La liberté d'entreprise, une perspective de droit comparé – Suisse - 21-06-2024

Fișe descriptive despre U.E. - Drepturile omului - 31-05-2024

Briefing - �Ϸ��վ in EU external action - 01-04-2025

Briefing - �Ϸ��վ and the United Nations - 03-09-2024