合法博彩网站

听听President. 鈥� The next item is the debate on the Commission statement on the situation of European academics and researchers in the US and the impact on academic freedom ().

听听Ekaterina Zaharieva, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam听President, honourable Members of the European 合法博彩网站, thank you for the opportunity to address the situation of our academics and researchers in the United States.

At the European Commission, we have been closely following recent developments across the Atlantic. As you are aware, the new administration has drastically cut federal research spending. Heavy staff and budget cuts have been announced for major federal science agencies. Overheads on federal grants could be dropped from 60听%听to 15听%.听We note with concern that some of these measures are targeting specific universities and scientific fields. These include climate science, vaccine research, as well as studies focused on women and minorities.

Meanwhile, across US states, over 150 bills were proposed to limit what universities can teach. Twenty-one have already become laws. At the same time, let me stress that this trend is not limited to the United States. Academic freedom is under pressure globally, as scientists worldwide are increasingly instrumentalised.

As the birthplace of enlightenment and the scientific revolution, Europe has a historical responsibility to defend academic freedom. While we are not immune to challenges, we remain a global leader in academic freedom. In 2020, we reaffirmed our commitment to freedom of scientific research with the Bonn Declaration. This commitment runs through our policies from Horizon Europe to our Pact for Research and Innovation.

At the same time, we cannot afford complacency. This global landscape is an opportunity to show the world that Europe will remain a safe space for science and research. Without freedom, knowledge cannot truly grow. The increasing number of countries associated to Horizon Europe also fosters our global engagement for academic freedom.

Let me be clear: I believe that Europe can and should be the best place to do science and research in the world 鈥� a place that attracts and retains researchers, both international and European, in particular those who are in search of a safe and supportive research environment. To ensure that Europe can be that place, we must enhance our 'pull factor'. We must offer the best opportunities for scientists and researchers.

The European Commission is proposing concrete steps in this direction. First, by building on our strengths. To ensure that science remains free from interference across the Union, we will enshrine freedom of scientific research into EU law. This is in line with 合法博彩网站's resolution on January 2024. We also improve the attractiveness and the access to our cutting-edge research infrastructure, notably in the upcoming strategy on research and technology infrastructures that we are preparing.

Second, we must make research careers attractive. Poor working conditions for researchers drives brain drain. This is why, under our Marie Sk艂odowska-Curie actions, this year we are launching a new Choose Europe pilot. It will provide higher allowances and longer recruitment periods for top PhD researchers who choose Europe to pursue their career.

In parallel, we will increase the support we provide to European Research Council grantees who relocate to Europe. This is already a possibility today, as grantees moving to Europe can benefit from an additional EUR听1 million top-up. We will increase this to EUR听2 million already this year. We are also examining further measures for 26-27, with a new report on this in due course.

Third, we must make our frameworks simpler and more cohesive. The future European research area act will coordinate research strategies, because 27 excellent but fragmented research strategies do not make a good European one. I have recently received a letter signed by 13 Member States asking to coordinate the measures that are being taken at national and European level, which shows how necessary this coordination effort is.

We further enhance cooperation of our universities in the European university alliances. Pooling resources is key to achieve the necessary scale for top research and education.听Also, a new visa strategy will be developed later this year. It will examine how the current rules are fit for purpose to attract top researchers, together with students and skilled workers from beyond our borders.

Honourable Members, to conclude, let me highlight the importance of close cooperation with this House and with all Member States to making this vision a reality. I also want to stress the role that our regions, our cities, our universities and research organisations have to play. Their work is what makes Europe not only a global scientific powerhouse, but also a model for a certain European way of life that the whole world admires.

Together we can keep Europe at the forefront: a home for our two million researchers, one quarter of the world's total, and a competitive, safe destination for global talent.

听听Wouter Beke, namens de PPE-Fractie. 鈥� Voorzitter, 鈥渁lles dat werkelijk groots en inspirerend is, is gecre毛erd door individuen die in alle vrijheid kunnen werken,鈥� aldus Albert Einstein.

Albert Einstein, en met hem vele anderen, onder wie de denkers van de Frankfurter Schule en Hannah Arendt, ontvluchtten in de jaren dertig het nazisme en fascisme in nazi-Duitsland en trokken naar de Verenigde Staten om daar in alle vrijheid en ruimte hun academische idee毛n te kunnen ontwikkelen.

Vandaag de dag zien we het omgekeerde: de regering-Trump hakt fors in op de financiering van onderzoek. Zij perkt bovendien de academische vrijheid in en verzwakt het maatschappelijk debat. Als gevolg hiervan gaan steeds meer Amerikaanse onderzoekers op zoek naar nieuwe toevluchtsoorden.

Dit biedt voor de Europese Unie een unieke kans om zich te profileren als vrijhaven voor internationaal talent en de innovatiekloof te dichten. Om de achterstand op dit gebied te overbruggen, moeten we de basis van innovatie versterken met de wetgevingshandeling inzake de Europese onderzoeksruimte, die voorziet in betere toegang tot onderzoeksinfrastructuur en een strategie voor het wegnemen van belemmeringen voor start-ups en scale-ups. Door de onderzoeksmiddelen te verdubbelen en de Clean Industrial Deal aan te nemen, kunnen we ambitieuze wetenschappers aantrekken om hier de technologie毛n van de toekomst te komen ontwikkelen.

De huidige bezuinigingen en het klimaat van onverdraagzaamheid in de Verenigde Staten bieden voor Europa een gouden kans. Laten we investeren in onderzoek, onderwijs en aantrekkelijke loopbanen, zodat de Europese Unie opnieuw een baken wordt voor de wetenschappers van morgen.

Laten we de Einsteins terughalen naar Europa!

听听Marcos Ros Sempere, en nombre del Grupo S&D. 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, se帽ora comisaria, los enemigos de la libertad siempre atacan primero a la investigaci贸n y a la educaci贸n. Siempre atacan primero a los que quieren encender las luces del progreso en nuestra sociedad. Nos quieren mantener en la oscuridad del oscurantismo. Esto es lo que ocurre en los Estados Unidos con los recortes masivos en investigaci贸n y en ense帽anza.

Y, en esta situaci贸n, la Uni贸n Europea tiene que ser el faro del conocimiento, el faro que marque el camino en defensa de la libertad acad茅mica, en defensa de un pilar fundamental de la democracia. Debemos reforzar nuestras universidades. Debemos facilitar la acogida de investigadores afectados. Debemos consolidarnos como tierra de pensamiento libre. M谩s asociaciones internacionales, m谩s financiaci贸n, m谩s atracci贸n de talento extranjero. Unas alianzas de universidades europeas fuertes que sean ejemplo.

Debemos mostrar a los investigadores afectados en los Estados Unidos que aqu铆 la libertad es un pilar inquebrantable, un faro contra el oscurantismo.

听听Malika Sorel, au nom du groupe PfE. 鈥� Chers coll猫gues, Madame la Commissaire, les attaques de l鈥檃dministration am茅ricaine contre la science et la libert茅 acad茅mique ont conduit 脿 des licenciements massifs de chercheurs, et le climat pousse les autres 脿 s鈥檃utocensurer.

Les r茅percussions sont internationales. Des projets de recherche collaborative sont concern茅s. Comme l鈥檈xprime tr猫s bien Luc听Ferry, ancien ministre fran莽ais de l鈥櫭ヾucation et de la recherche, la science est intrins猫quement d茅mocratique, et c鈥檈st pourquoi nous devons nous inqui茅ter.

Nous assistons 脿 deux attaques sym茅triques: d鈥檜n c么t茅, le wokisme et le politiquement correct, qui ont s茅vi durant des d茅cennies, y compris dans nos pays, et de l鈥檃utre un mouvement de r茅action qui entend couper les vivres 脿 des organismes de recherche sous pr茅texte qu鈥檌ls ont pu pactiser avec le wokisme.

Que faire? Il nous faut repenser au rapport de Mario听Draghi sur la comp茅titivit茅. Chers coll猫gues, nous devons absolument tirer profit de cette fen锚tre d鈥檕pportunit茅, d鈥檃utant plus que nous observons que des flux financiers se d茅tournent des 脡tats-Unis au profit de l鈥橴nion europ茅enne. Accueillons les chercheurs am茅ricains aptes 脿 favoriser l鈥檌nnovation et 脿 booster notre croissance, et mettons sur pied des programmes de retour pour nos propres talents.

听听Fernand Kartheiser, au nom du groupe ECR. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Madame la Commissaire, ceux qui reprochent au pr茅sident听Trump de vouloir restreindre la libert茅 acad茅mique peuvent aussi verser dans l鈥檈xag茅ration. Si la libert茅 de critiquer la politique isra茅lienne doit 锚tre pr茅serv茅e, la lutte contre l鈥檃ntis茅mitisme et la violence sur les campus universitaires est justifi茅e.

De m锚me, il faut r茅tablir la qualit茅 de l鈥檈nseignement et de la recherche en 茅cartant des pseudo-sciences, comme par exemple la th茅orie du genre. En promouvant la m茅ritocratie, on r茅tablit la justice et l鈥櫭﹒uit茅. Les Am茅ricains ne favorisent plus certaines personnes en raison de leurs caract茅ristiques physiques.

Au lieu de critiquer cette approche, nous devrions l鈥檃dopter. Faisons de nos universit茅s et de nos instituts de recherche des hauts lieux de l鈥檈xcellence intellectuelle et de la libert茅 acad茅mique, tout comme le font actuellement les 脡tats-Unis.

Malheureusement, la r茅alit茅 est autre. Les universit茅s europ茅ennes perdent en attractivit茅. Certains de nos 脡tats membres sont tr猫s mal class茅s dans l鈥檌ndice de libert茅 acad茅mique. Les pressions exerc茅es sur des professeurs ou des chercheurs sont de plus en plus fr茅quentes. Des conf茅rences, par exemple sur le sexe biologique en sciences naturelles, ont d没 锚tre annul茅es. Souvent, ces pressions sur les chercheurs sont exerc茅es par les universit茅s elles-m锚mes, ce qui est totalement inacceptable.

Compte tenu de ces 茅volutions, l鈥櫭ヽart entre les 脡tats-Unis et l鈥橢urope risque de se creuser. Des deux c么t茅s de l鈥橝tlantique, tout doit 锚tre fait pour soutenir et d茅fendre tant la libert茅 d鈥檈xpression que la libert茅 acad茅mique.

听听Laurence Farreng, au nom du groupe Renew. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Madame la Commissaire, chers coll猫gues, 芦la libert茅, c鈥檈st la libert茅 de dire que deux et deux font quatre. Lorsque cela est accord茅, le reste suit禄. Cette citation de Georges Orwell a une r茅sonance particuli猫re, aujourd鈥檋ui, dans l鈥橝m茅rique de Donald Trump. La recherche de la v茅rit茅, la science se fondant sur des faits: tout cela est balay茅 sur l鈥檃utel de l鈥檌d茅ologie trumpiste.

Depuis deux mois, pour les universit茅s am茅ricaines, ce ne sont que fonds gel茅s, licenciements, intimidations. Et les trumpistes vont plus loin dans la dystopie.听Pollution, femme, victime, handicap, racisme, 茅驳补濒颈迟茅, changement climatique, sant茅 mentale: voici quelques mots parmi la centaine 脿 avoir 茅t茅 censur茅s par l鈥檃dministration Trump. Autant de mots que les scientifiques ne peuvent plus utiliser dans leurs projets de recherche. Les 脡tats-Unis, jusqu鈥檃lors eldorado des chercheurs du monde entier, sont devenus un repoussoir.

尝鈥橴nion europ茅enne a bien s没r une place 脿 prendre dans cette reconfiguration. Elle doit devenir un phare pour la libert茅 acad茅mique, un nouveau p么le d鈥檃ttraction des scientifiques internationaux. Cela doit se traduire par un plan ambitieux et par des investissements de long terme pour nos universit茅s.

听听Alexandra Geese, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group. 鈥� Madam President, Commissioner, colleagues, the English newspaper The Guardian put it in a nutshell: when the physicists need burner phones, that's when you know that America has changed. And they do need burner phones; a French scientist was recently prevented from entering the United States because US Border Patrol agents read his phone and found a personal opinion about Trump's science politics.

The National Science Foundation is scouring thousands of research projects for dozens of newly prohibited words, and notified scientists to halt work that doesn't adhere to Trump's censorship. One word on that list is 'women'. The US prohibits public research about women. Let this sink in.

'Free speech is in retreat,' said Vice President J.D. Vance in Munich. Yes, it is 鈥� but not in Europe, in the US. But for Europe, this is a very special moment and also a special chance, because when Europe wasn't free, the US boosted their research, offering sanctuary to European scientists. And now it's our turn. Let us massively step up our programmes to welcome all scholars and scientists who want to research here. Let us turn Europe into the global sanctuary of academic freedom.

听听Mario Furore, a nome del gruppo The Left. 鈥� Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, la libert脿 accademica 猫 sotto attacco, non solo in regimi autoritari, ma anche in paesi che si definiscono democratici.

Pensate che negli Stati Uniti i recenti ordini esecutivi della nuova amministrazione Trump hanno congelato miliardi di dollari per la ricerca e censurato ambiti del sapere, quali il cambiamento climatico e le questioni di genere, e tutto questo perch茅 siamo ostaggio di un'ideologia.

E oggi qui denunciamo un fatto gravissimo: un ricercatore francese, in viaggio per una conferenza in Texas, 猫 stato bloccato ed espulso dagli USA dopo che, al controllo doganale, sono stati letti i suoi messaggi critici verso Trump. Un atto di repressione politica mascherato da sicurezza nazionale.

尝鈥�Academic Freedom Index mostra un declino inquietante e l'Italia, purtroppo, non 猫 immune, perch茅 assistiamo a ingerenze politiche e precariet脿 strutturale che minano l'autonomia dei nostri atenei.

Chiediamo all'UE di non restare in silenzio e di impegnarsi pi霉 a fondo per la libert脿 accademica.

听听Marc Jongen, on behalf of the ESN Group. 鈥� Madam听President, so the Trump administration in the United States is threatening academic freedom? This claim by the European Commission and some MEPs here is pure hypocrisy. Where was the outcry from the EU and the academia in Europe when more and more non-leftist scientists in the US were dismissed or forced to resign by their radical colleagues and the left-wing student mob simply because they didn't bow to the woke ideology? Bret Weinstein, Joseph Manson and Mike Adams even committed suicide. The wokeness virus has taken over US academia and in Europe it's also widespread, including its cancel culture.

If President Trump now takes action against the intolerant and unscientific gender ideology, if he stops DEI programmes that discriminate white people and also restricts the dogmatic, almost religious climate research, then he's taking measures that help restore scientific freedom, not suppress it. We need such measures in Europe too.

听听Adri谩n V谩zquez L谩zara (PPE). 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, seg煤n el ranking de Shangh谩i sobre calidad universitaria, tan solo una de las treinta mejores universidades del mundo se encuentra en la Uni贸n Europea. Por el contrario, diecinueve de esos treinta principales centros de ense帽anza e investigaci贸n, es decir, un 63听%, est谩n en los Estados Unidos.

La carrera por la competitividad y la innovaci贸n es una carrera de fondo. Muchas de las empresas tecnol贸gicas que hoy dominan el mercado fueron en su d铆a proyectos surgidos en entornos universitarios. Europa no puede quedarse atr谩s: debe apostar con firmeza, primero, por retener el talento 鈥攁lgo que no hemos hecho muy bien en los 煤ltimos a帽os, porque much铆simos europeos est谩n en universidades y empresas estadounidenses鈥� y, segundo, por atraer el talento a nuestros centros acad茅micos. Una universidad europea que aspira a competir en la esfera internacional es el mejor reflejo de una Uni贸n Europea comprometida con su futuro.

Ahora creo que es el momento para lograrlo. El Departamento de Educaci贸n estadounidense ha reducido su plantilla en aproximadamente un 50听% en tan solo dos meses de la Administraci贸n Trump. A esta decisi贸n, Europa puede ofrecer libertad acad茅mica, puede ofrecer un estilo de vida atractivo para cualquier investigador y deber铆a ofrecer mucha m谩s financiaci贸n.

Estamos en una posici贸n privilegiada para liderar la investigaci贸n en la pr贸xima d茅cada, y muchos de los acad茅micos que buscan salir de los Estados Unidos son europeos que buscan hoy m谩s que nunca volver. Por eso, se帽ora comisaria, yo la invito a hacerse una ronda por las universidades estadounidenses y que les convenza y traiga el mayor n煤mero de europeos de vuelta a su casa.

听听Nicola Zingaretti (S&D). 鈥� Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, benissimo lottare come europei, finalmente, per la libert脿 della scienza, che 猫 vulnerabile ovunque e in qualsiasi momento.

Donald Trump ha effettuato gravi tagli nel campo dell'educazione, ha licenziato met脿 dei funzionari del dipartimento e ha ridotto i finanziamenti alle universit脿; noi sappiamo che gli Stati Uniti sono stati un pilastro della ricerca mondiale, che ha garantito progresso per tutto e per tutti.

Per questo l'attacco di Trump ci riguarda: 猫 un attacco all'educazione, alla ricerca e anche un attacco alla libert脿 intellettuale. 脠 un rischio per il progresso del mondo.

L'Unione europea e gli Stati Uniti rappresentano quasi il 50听% dei fondi globali per la ricerca e l'innovazione e ora noi europei abbiamo una responsabilit脿 fondamentale: dobbiamo agire subito, per supportare le nostre universit脿 nel creare un boom di attrattivit脿.

Accendiamo dunque la forza dell'Europa per attrarre i giovani, gli scienziati, i ricercatori, i docenti e per difendere il nostro futuro insieme.

听听Christophe Grudler (Renew). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Madame la Commissaire, avec M. Trump, les chercheurs am茅ricains vivent un v茅ritable cauchemar: budgets coup茅s, bourses supprim茅es, licenciements abusifs鈥� Beaucoup envisagent de quitter leur pays. Ces attaques ne sont pas seulement financi猫res, elles sont id茅ologiques. C鈥檈st une censure de la recherche sur le climat, sur la sant茅, sur les technologies de pointe, sacrifi茅e sur l鈥檃utel du populisme.

Nous revoil脿 脿 l鈥櫭﹑oque de Galil茅e, o霉 la science doit plier face au dogme d鈥檜n seul homme. 尝鈥橢urope doit recueillir ces talents et devenir le bastion mondial de l鈥檈xcellence scientifique et de la libert茅 acad茅mique. Offrons 脿 ces chercheurs un avenir avec des financements et des perspectives. Les 22听millions d鈥檈uros annonc茅s pour le projet pilote sont une bonne chose, mais cela ne suffira pas. Il faut aller plus loin et chercher d鈥檃utres financements, publics comme priv茅s.

Dear American researchers, European research needs you now.

听听Anna Strolenberg (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Madam听President, a society that silences academics is a society in decline. A society that censors research on climate change and gender is a society in decline. Academic freedom is not a privilege; it's a condition to do your job.

So, to all European leaders, to the European Commission, I have a message. We can feel sorry for all those academics in the US, or we can provide them with something better: a place where research is valued, a place where academic freedom is protected.

Attracting this talent is in our own interest. If not, we will become a society 鈥� a continent听鈥� of the past. We will become the backseat drivers. So we need this talent.

Today I read Europe needs to revive its hunger to attract talent, and this is true. We have to revive our hunger to become the frontrunners in research and innovation. So let's triple our research budgets, let's create easy visas for those researchers, and let's take away hurdles for start-ups. Let's make Europe the home for academic freedom where all talent counts.

听听Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski (PPE). 鈥� Stany Zjednoczone, ze Statu膮 Wolno艣ci, w obszarze nauki mog膮 sta膰 si臋 zaprzeczeniem w艂asnych kluczowych idei. Ingerencje najpierw s艂owne, potem finansowe, a w finale regulacje dotycz膮ce ogranicze艅 w badaniach nie p艂yn膮 dzi艣 z Kremla, lecz z Bia艂ego Domu. Ameryka艅skie uczelnie zaczynaj膮 by膰 pouczane, ograniczane w tematach prac, a Departament Edukacji podpisem prezydenta zosta艂 zniesiony. Wobec ponad 40 uczelni, w tym takich jak Yale, prowadzone s膮 post臋powania 鈥� uwaga 鈥� o naruszenie praw obywatelskich.

S膮 dwa szczeg贸lnie wra偶liwe obszary, swoiste barometry wolno艣ci. To 艣wiat kultury i 艣wiat nauki. Nie chc臋 dokonywa膰 dalszych ocen polityki kluczowego przecie偶 pa艅stwa na 艣wiecie. Dzi艣 raczej chc臋 pozytywnie si臋 odnie艣膰 do pierwszych propozycji naszych europejskich uczelni. Zapraszamy na Stary Kontynent i badaczy, i naukowc贸w, i student贸w. Zagwarantujemy im wolno艣膰 akademick膮, warunki do poszukiwania najlepszych rozwi膮za艅, zar贸wno by dba膰 o post臋p w medycynie, jak i by monitorowa膰 zmiany klimatyczne.

听听Lina G谩lvez (S&D). 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, se帽ora comisaria, la libertad acad茅mica lleva a帽os disminuyendo de la mano de las propuestas antiliberales y tambi茅n de la mercantilizaci贸n del conocimiento.

Pero ahora, adem谩s, con la llegada de la Administraci贸n Trump, la censura, la narrativa anticient铆fica y la cancelaci贸n de la financiaci贸n de muchos proyectos de investigaci贸n y programas acad茅micos han puesto a la comunidad cient铆fica de los Estados Unidos en un contexto de falta de libertad, sobre todo en 谩reas de conocimiento como el medio ambiente o los estudios de g茅nero, que est谩n siendo desmanteladas.

En este contexto, la fuente de competitividad de los Estados Unidos, que siempre ha sido su capacidad de atracci贸n de talento, puede desaparecer.

As铆 que Europa debe activar y dotar el programa propuesto por Manuel Heitor, conocido como 芦Choose Europe禄, para recuperar y atraer el talento mediante una mejor financiaci贸n, facilitando visados y fortaleciendo las colaboraciones internacionales.

Pero no solo: la defensa de la democracia, la igualdad y los Estados del bienestar pueden y deben ser el plus que aporte a Europa a nuestra apuesta para atraer los mejores talentos como fuente de competitividad y riqueza en el m谩s amplio sentido del t茅rmino.

听听Dan Barna (Renew). 鈥� Doamn膬 pre葯edint膬, dou膬 personaje din istoria umanit膬葲ii au destine ce sunt ast膬zi foarte actuale. Giordano Bruno, ars pe rug pentru crima de a spune c膬 Universul este infinit, 葯i Galileo Galilei, sc膬pat de rug, dar 卯nchis pe via葲膬 pentru crima de a afirma c膬 P膬m芒ntul se 卯nv芒rte 卯n jurul Soarelui. 400 de ani mai t芒rziu, ast膬zi, 卯n Statele Unite, universit膬葲i sunt amenin葲ate c膬 pierd finan葲area, programe de cercetare sunt 卯ntrerupte pentru c膬 nu convin unei dogme, oameni de 葯tiin葲膬 ajung s膬 se team膬 de poli葲ia g芒ndurilor sau a cuvintelor.

Europa este acum singurul 葯i cel mai puternic garant al libert膬葲ii, at芒ta timp c芒t administra葲ia actual膬 a SUA tocmai experimenteaz膬 aplica葲ia 鈥濱nchizi葲ia ideologic膬 2.0鈥�. Ceea ce p膬rea de neimaginat acum c芒teva luni este o realitate pe care o tr膬im. Europa a devenit refugiu al libert膬葲ii academice. Exist膬 deja ini葲iative de azil 葯tiin葲ific 卯n Fran葲a, Belgia sau Olanda 葯i trebuie salutate, dar nu este de ajuns. Comisia European膬 trebuie s膬 prezinte 葯i s膬 implementeze de urgen葲膬 un program de atragere a oamenilor de 葯tiin葲膬 din Statele Unite. Spiritele libere trebuie s膬 aib膬 un c膬min.

Catch-the-eye procedure

听听Sebastian Tynkkynen (ECR). 鈥� Madam听President, during the latest years we have witnessed a huge threat to academic freedom. When woke, DEI and critical race theory flooded the great intellectual institutions of the West, this body was silent as a crypt.

Here are a few examples.

Mandatory critical-race-theory training that sought to indoctrinate students into rejecting their unconscious thoughts and behaviours towards minority groups 鈥� where was the outrage?

A bloated DEI bureaucracy demanding teachers to sign diversity statements in prestigious American universities like Harvard and MIT 鈥� where was the outrage?

A study on the ineffectiveness of puberty blockers going unpublished because of politics 鈥� where was the outrage?

Actually, you wanted this to continue, and now you are outraged when a lot of people are saying to all this, 'No, thank you.'

听听螝蠋蟽蟿伪蟼 螤伪蟺伪未维魏畏蟼 (NI). 鈥� 螝蠀蟻委伪 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 魏伪蟿伪纬纬苇位位慰蠀渭蔚 蟿喂蟼 未喂蠋尉蔚喂蟼, 蟿喂蟼 蟺慰喂谓苇蟼, 蟿喂蟼 伪蟺蔚喂位苇蟼 蟽蔚 伪魏伪未畏渭伪蠆魏慰蠉蟼, 蔚蟻蔚蠀谓畏蟿苇蟼 魏伪喂 蠁慰喂蟿畏蟿苇蟼 蟽蟿喂蟼 螚螤螒 伪位位维 魏伪喂 蟽蟿畏谓 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 螆谓蠅蟽畏, 蔚蟺蔚喂未萎 蔚魏蠁蟻维味慰蠀谓 伪蟿伪位维谓蟿蔚蠀蟿伪 蟿畏谓 伪位位畏位蔚纬纬蠉畏 蟿慰蠀蟼 蟽蟿慰谓 伪纬蠅谓喂味蠈渭蔚谓慰 蟺伪位伪喂蟽蟿喂谓喂伪魏蠈 位伪蠈, 魏伪喂 魏伪蟿伪未喂魏维味慰蠀谓 蟿畏 纬蔚谓慰魏蟿慰谓委伪 蟿慰蠀 魏蟻维蟿慰蠀蟼 蟿慰蠀 螜蟽蟻伪萎位 渭蔚 蟿畏 蟽蟿萎蟻喂尉畏 蟿蠅谓 螚螤螒, 蟿畏蟼 螘螘 魏伪喂 蟿慰蠀 螡螒韦螣. 螚 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺维胃蔚喂伪 蟿蟻慰渭慰魏蟻维蟿畏蟽畏蟼 蟿畏蟼 魏伪蟿伪蟽蟿慰位萎蟼 伪蟺苇蟿蠀蠂蔚 纬喂伪蟿委 慰喂 位伪慰委 尾蟻委蟽魏慰谓蟿伪喂 蟽蟿畏 蟽蠅蟽蟿萎 蟺位蔚蠀蟻维 蟿畏蟼 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委伪蟼, 蟽蟿畏蟻委味慰蠀谓 蟿慰谓 伪纬蠋谓伪 蟿蠅谓 螤伪位伪喂蟽蟿喂谓委蠅谓 纬喂伪 谓伪 蟿蔚蟻渭伪蟿喂蟽蟿蔚委 畏 喂蟽蟻伪畏位喂谓萎 魏伪蟿慰蠂萎, 纬喂伪 蔚位蔚蠉胃蔚蟻畏 伪谓蔚尉维蟻蟿畏蟿畏 蟺伪蟿蟻委未伪, 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 蔚蟺喂蟽蟿蟻慰蠁萎 蠈位蠅谓 蟿蠅谓 蟺蟻慰蟽蠁蠉纬蠅谓 蟽蟿喂蟼 蔚蟽蟿委蔚蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 伪蟺蔚位蔚蠀胃苇蟻蠅蟽畏 蠈位蠅谓 蟿蠅谓 魏蟻伪蟿慰蠀渭苇谓蠅谓.

危萎渭蔚蟻伪 蔚委谓伪喂 伪谓维纬魏畏 谓伪 魏位喂渭伪魏蠅胃蔚委 慰 伪纬蠋谓伪蟼 蟿蠅谓 蟽蟺慰蠀未伪蟽蟿蠋谓, 蟿蠅谓 蟺伪谓蔚蟺喂蟽蟿畏渭喂伪魏蠋谓, 魏伪胃畏纬畏蟿蠋谓 魏伪喂 蔚蟻蔚蠀谓畏蟿蠋谓 蔚谓维谓蟿喂伪 蟽蟿伪 蟺蟻慰纬蟻维渭渭伪蟿伪 蟿慰蠀 螡螒韦螣, 蟽蟿喂蟼 苇蟻蔚蠀谓蔚蟼 未喂蟺位萎蟼 蠂蟻萎蟽畏蟼, 蔚谓维谓蟿喂伪 蟽蟿畏 蟽蠀谓蔚蟻纬伪蟽委伪 渭蔚 蟿喂蟼 喂蟽蟻伪畏位喂谓苇蟼 魏伪喂 维位位蔚蟼 尾喂慰渭畏蠂伪谓委蔚蟼 蟿慰蠀 蟺慰位苇渭慰蠀, 蔚谓维谓蟿喂伪 蟽蟿畏 蠂蟻畏渭伪蟿慰未蠈蟿畏蟽萎 蟿慰蠀蟼 伪蟺蠈 蟺蟻慰纬蟻维渭渭伪蟿伪 蠈蟺蠅蟼 蟿慰 Horizon Europe 萎 蟿慰 蟽蠉渭蠁蠅谓慰 苇蟻蔚蠀谓伪蟼 魏伪喂 魏伪喂谓慰蟿慰渭委伪蟼. 螡伪 伪谓蟿喂蟽蟿伪胃慰蠉渭蔚 蟽蟿畏 渭蔚蟿伪蟿蟻慰蟺萎 蟿蠅谓 蟺伪谓蔚蟺喂蟽蟿畏渭委蠅谓 蟽蔚 蔚尉维蟻蟿畏渭伪 蟿畏蟼 蟺慰位蔚渭喂魏萎蟼 慰喂魏慰谓慰渭委伪蟼 蟿畏蟼 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎蟼 螆谓蠅蟽畏蟼, 蟿畏蟼 蠈尉蠀谓蟽畏蟼, 魏位喂渭维魏蠅蟽畏蟼 魏伪喂 蔚蟺苇魏蟿伪蟽畏蟼 蟿畏蟼 喂渭蟺蔚蟻喂伪位喂蟽蟿喂魏萎蟼 蟺慰位蔚渭喂魏萎蟼 蔚渭蟺位慰魏萎蟼 蟽蟿畏谓 螣蠀魏蟻伪谓委伪, 蟿畏 螠苇蟽畏 螒谓伪蟿慰位萎 魏伪喂 蟿慰谓 螜谓未慰蔚喂蟻畏谓喂魏蠈.

(End of catch-the-eye procedure)

听听Ekaterina Zaharieva, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam听President, honourable Members, thank you very much again for this debate and thanks for sharing your insights. I took careful note of them, and I am pleased that your interventions in general highlight broad political support for research and science.

Supporting our researchers and scientists, whether in Europe or abroad, is something that cuts across national and party lines, and we should support these initiatives as policymakers.

In the coming months, we will implement the measures that I presented to you at the beginning of this debate, and we will also explore additional ideas, also benefiting from this debate today.

What is really important is that we will continue to defend academic freedom and independence of European universities and academia, because when we defend academic freedom, we invest in the future. Without independent research, we risk losing the trust in science, which is really very dangerous.

Our approach must be pragmatic and in line with our interests, but we will also continue to be partners, to focus on partnership, not in unfair competition. We will continue cooperating openly with our partners, including with the United States, building bridges through science, even when politics sees wars.

Honourable Members, in times of uncertainty, researchers at home and abroad are looking at Europe 鈥� not only for stability, but for leadership based on our European values. To them today I want to say:听Europe sees you. Europe is ready to support you. Europe is your home.

听听President. 鈥� Thank you very much, Commissioner. The debate is closed.