合法博彩网站

听听President. 鈥� The next item is the debate on the Commission statement on the need to ensure democratic pluralism, strengthen integrity, transparency and anti-corruption policies in the EU ().

听听Ekaterina Zaharieva, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, honourable Members, democracy is a fundamental value of European Union, together with respect for the rule of law and fundamental rights. The functioning of the Union is founded on representative democracy which supports decision鈥憁aking and which is close and accountable to the citizens. Representative democracy is grounded in free and fair elections, trusted democratic institutions and an open and plural democratic process.

Democratic pluralism requires that the democratic process be open, contestable and acceptable to all citizens equally. Decision鈥憁aking, which is reasoned, transparent and accountable, and for citizens to have access to reliable information from a plurality of sources, including as provided on the basis of journalistic and scientific standards.

The Commission supports democratic pluralism in the EU. The Commission is therefore stepping up its engagement in favour of democracy, notably with the preparation of the European Democracy Shield, a key initiative announced in the political guidelines for this mandate. The Democracy Shield will provide a strategic framework to safeguard and strengthen democracy in the EU, aiming to reinforce public trust in democracy and democratic institutions. It will be underpinned by several concrete initiatives.

The Shield will cover several areas, namely: first, foreign interference, information manipulation and disinformation; second, the fairness and integrity of elections and the strengthening of democratic frameworks; third, societal resilience and preparedness; and, last, citizens' participation and engagement.

Citizens' trust in national and European democratic institutions is linked to overall trust in democracy. Democratic resilience at national and at European level are mutually reinforcing. European democracy must be more participative and more vibrant. The role of free, independent and pluralistic media in this context cannot be restated enough.

While preparing the Democracy Shield, the Commission will follow a 'whole of society' approach. We will consult broadly with stakeholders. The public consultation has been launched today for a duration of eight weeks. We will step up our work on defending all parts of our democracy. We will protect our free media and civil society. The rule of law and the fight against corruption will remain at the heart of our work. We will continue to make best use of all our tools, including enforcement.

Integrity and transparency are key. As the Commission President explained in her political guidance, there is an urgent need to impose transparency on foreign funding of our public life as common law. 合法博彩网站 is currently considering a proposal from the Commission on interest representation, on which rapid progress should be made in order to further enlarge our EU toolbox with common EU proportionate standards.

There is also work to do closer to home, to live up our values and to ensure that citizens see us upholding the laws we make. As part of the Commission's commitment to transparency, Commissioners, their cabinet members and all Commission staff holding management functions publish information and minutes on meetings held with interest representatives. Meetings related to law or policy formulation or implementation in the EU can only take place if the interest representatives are registered in the EU Transparency Register.

On corruption: corruption is a threat to the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights. It is a hidden crime with no obvious single victim. Its harm is felt in the erosion of the integrity of our institutions, and its cost is borne collectively by taxpayers. Europeans consider corruption to be unacceptable. It is not acceptable to give money, give a gift, do a favour to get something from the public administration. Corruption undermines trust in the administration, alienating citizens from democracy, reducing compliance with law and obstructing the state from providing help when help is needed. And it's expensive.

Every year, corruption is estimated to cost the EU up to 6听% of its GDP. This is why it is so important that we step up our efforts to tackle it. In 2023, the Commission proposed to update the EU anti-corruption rules. The directive is now being negotiated. The Commission welcomes the 合法博彩网站's ambition and values the positive progress made by the co鈥憀egislators in the latest trilogue. It calls on the co鈥憀egislators to agree on an ambitious outcome.

I can assure you that this Commission is very committed to ensure democratic pluralism and strengthen integrity, transparency and anti-corruption policies in the EU. I remain fully available to hear your views as we work together to achieve this common goal. Thank you very much for your attention.

听听Lor谩nt Vincze, on behalf of the PPE Group. 鈥� Madam President, Madam Commissioner, dear colleagues, the European 合法博彩网站 is under attack. We face external enemies who would like to see a weakened parliament. But there are also internal interests that oppose a strong, influential and increasingly relevant parliament.

The EPP Group fully supports the ongoing judicial investigations and upholds the presumption of innocence for all individuals involved. The reputation of 合法博彩网站 and several of its Members was tarnished three years ago. Yet there are still no indictments against any Members.

Now, again, colleagues who signed a letter requesting 5G services in rural areas saw their names published in the press, even though they have not yet been questioned by the authorities. The headlines against them amount to public executions. This is unacceptable. We must defend the free mandate of the Members.

The Belgian authorities must conduct their own investigation properly, without leaking partial information to the press or making ambiguous statements. The judicial saga surrounding Qatargate and the handling of the current investigation into Members by the Belgian authorities raised a number of questions. Therefore, the EPP Group calls for a hearing in the LIBE Committee, with the participation of the relevant Belgian authorities.

Some colleagues will use this momentum as an argument to push for the implementation of the ethics body agreement. Colleagues, an outsourced ethics body cannot prevent wrongdoing or corruption, but it would compromise the independence of our 合法博彩网站. We must get it right. 合法博彩网站 must withdraw from the ethics body and establish a firm, clear, robust and efficient internal mechanism to strengthen its integrity.

听听Juan Fernando L贸pez Aguilar, en nombre del Grupo S&D. 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, se帽ora comisaria, esta legislatura del Parlamento Europeo arranca como todas, obligada a aprender de sus experiencias, y particularmente de las malas. Lo hace con un compromiso de reforzar su integridad, su transparencia y su rendici贸n de cuentas. 驴Por qu茅? Porque en la legislatura pasada tuvimos una mala experiencia con el llamado 芦Qatargate禄, que oblig贸 a este Parlamento Europeo a tomar muy en serio la obligaci贸n de reforzar sus est谩ndares de daci贸n de cuentas y de transparencia.

Exactamente por eso, negociamos y acordamos con el resto de las instituciones europeas, de acuerdo con la base jur铆dica que presta el art铆culo 295 del Tratado de Funcionamiento y el art铆culo 13 del Tratado de la Uni贸n Europea, un acuerdo interinstitucional. Por tanto, ya est谩 en plazo de cumplir el mandato adquirido por este Parlamento Europeo de reformar su Reglamento interno para poner de una vez en marcha un 贸rgano 茅tico que incorpore representantes de las instituciones, pero tambi茅n cinco expertos independientes. Ellos ayudar谩n a compartir buenas pr谩cticas y a elevar ese est谩ndar de daci贸n de cuentas del Parlamento Europeo.

Esto se suma a la Directiva sobre la lucha contra la corrupci贸n, que ya est谩 en avanzada negociaci贸n con el Consejo, y a la Comisi贸n Especial sobre el Escudo Europeo de la Democracia, que lanza un mensaje a los ciudadanos. No podemos perder la oportunidad de decir que tenemos que reformar el Reglamento del Parlamento Europeo, sin arrastrar los pies, para poner definitivamente en pie el 贸rgano 茅tico. Cuanto antes mejor.

听听Fabrice Leggeri, au nom du groupe PfE. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, la d茅mocratie, c鈥檈st le droit des peuples 脿 choisir librement leurs dirigeants. Mais, en France, ce droit vient d鈥櫭猼re bafou茅. Marine听Le听Pen, cheffe de l鈥檕pposition et favorite de l鈥櫭﹍ection pr茅sidentielle, a 茅t茅 condamn茅e 脿 l鈥檌n茅ligibilit茅 avec ex茅cution imm茅diate. Alors qu鈥檌l n鈥檡 a dans cette affaire ni corruption ni enrichissement personnel, le tribunal a pris une d茅cision politique qui prive les Fran莽ais de leur choix.

L鈥櫭﹖at de droit suppose un droit au recours. Ici, la peine s鈥檃pplique imm茅diatement, avant m锚me tout jugement d茅finitif. C鈥檈st une d茅rive sans pr茅c茅dent. L鈥橴nion europ茅enne, toujours prompte 脿 donner des le莽ons de d茅mocratie, restera-t-elle silencieuse face 脿 cette instrumentalisation de la justice? Nous ne laisserons pas la d茅mocratie 锚tre confisqu茅e.

听听Mariusz Kami艅ski, w imieniu grupy ECR. 鈥� Szanowna Pani Komisarz! Opinia publiczna po raz kolejny zbulwersowana jest informacjami dotycz膮cymi afer korupcyjnych zwi膮zanych z instytucjami unijnymi. Tym razem mamy do czynienia z nielegalnym lobbingiem na rzecz chi艅skiej firmy Huawei. Tak jak w przypadku wcze艣niejszych afer zamiast rzetelnej informacji, propozycji konkretnych rozwi膮za艅 na przysz艂o艣膰 mamy og贸lnikow膮 debat臋 o niczym. Establishment europejski nauczy艂 si臋 dzia艂a膰 w cieniu, poza realnym nadzorem obywateli, w atmosferze bezkarno艣ci. Niedawno dowiedzieli艣my si臋 od szefowej Prokuratury Europejskiej, 偶e raport Olaf dotycz膮cy udzia艂u w aferze katarskiej wysokiego urz臋dnika Komisji Europejskiej by艂 przed ni膮 ukrywany. Urz臋dnik ten, mimo dost臋pnych dowod贸w, nadal pracuje w instytucjach unijnych. Komisja Europejska dalej milczy na temat zarzutu prania brudnych pieni臋dzy przez komisarza Reyndersa, do czego mia艂o dochodzi膰 podczas sprawowania przez niego funkcji.

Trwaj膮ce prace nad tzw. dyrektyw膮 antykorupcyjn膮 nie rozwi膮偶膮 problemu korupcji w instytucjach unijnych, poniewa偶 dyrektywa adresowana jest do pa艅stw cz艂onkowskich. Mo偶na jednak za pomoc膮 prostych rozwi膮za艅 zwi臋kszy膰 przejrzysto艣膰 dzia艂a艅 Komisji Europejskiej. Wprowad藕my jawne, szczeg贸艂owe, sk艂adane pod rygorem odpowiedzialno艣ci karnej o艣wiadczenia maj膮tkowe dla komisarzy i dla wysokich rang膮 urz臋dnik贸w unijnych. Niech poka偶膮 obywatelom, jakie maj膮 maj膮tki i jakie s膮 藕r贸d艂a jego pochodzenia. Do艣膰 korupcji w Brukseli. Czas dzia艂a膰.

听听Sandro Gozi, au nom du groupe Renew. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, chers coll猫gues, respectons l鈥檃ccord conclu sur l鈥檕rgane charg茅 des questions d鈥櫭﹖hique.听Pacta sunt servanda. Je m鈥檃dresse au groupe听PPE, au groupe听ECR et au groupe des Patriotes pour l鈥橢urope: il est temps de mettre fin 脿 vos man艙uvres d鈥檕bstruction. Avan莽ons enfin sur la transparence et sur le r么le du Parlement dans l鈥檕rgane charg茅 des questions d鈥櫭﹖hique!

Cet organe n鈥檌mpose aucune limite excessive 脿 notre libert茅 de mandat en tant que repr茅sentants 茅lus. Toutes les d茅cisions prises concernant l鈥櫭﹖ablissement des normes communes le seront par consensus. Rien ne nous sera impos茅 sans notre consentement.听Notre responsabilit茅 est claire: renforcer la transparence pour restaurer la confiance. Les soup莽ons de corruption qui p猫sent sur notre Parlement doivent 锚tre trait茅s avec rigueur.

Par ailleurs, je suis d鈥檃ccord avec le repr茅sentant du PPE lorsqu鈥檌l affirme qu鈥檌l y a un point essentiel 脿 ne jamais oublier, c鈥檈st que nous ne sommes ni des procureurs ni des juges, pas plus que ne l鈥檈st la presse. Ne m茅langeons donc pas tout. Les enqu锚tes judiciaires suivent leur cours. Dans une d茅mocratie, l鈥櫭﹖at de droit commence par la pr茅somption d鈥檌nnocence. Mes chers coll猫gues, on ne prot猫ge pas la pr茅somption d鈥檌nnocence en s鈥檕pposant 脿 plus de transparence.

Tenir parole aujourd鈥檋ui sur l鈥檕rgane interinstitutionnel charg茅 des questions d鈥櫭﹖hique, c鈥檈st nous renforcer demain. C鈥檈st renforcer notre int茅grit茅 et notre cr茅dibilit茅, mais aussi nous donner les moyens de d茅fendre la dignit茅 de chaque membre de cette institution.

听听Daniel Freund, im Namen der Verts/ALE-Fraktion. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Wieder wurden T眉ren versiegelt, wieder wurden B眉ros durchsucht, und wieder besteht der Verdacht, dass Europaabgeordnete sich haben schmieren lassen. Luxusreisen hier, Fu脽balltickets dort und daf眉r dann Gef盲lligkeiten f眉r Huawei. Man hat ein gewisses D茅j脿 Vu听鈥� wir haben das alles bei Kartar-Gate schon mal sehr 盲hnlich gesehen, und dabei wollten wir doch genau das verhindern. Wir wollten, dass die Regeln zur Korruptionsbek盲mpfung, zur Lobbykontrolle in diesem Haus endlich durchgesetzt werden. Denn genau deswegen passieren diese Korruptionsskandale ja: weil immer noch zu viele glauben, dass sie am Ende damit durchkommen und selbst wenn man geschnappt wird, es keine Strafen gibt.

Ein unabh盲ngiges Gremium, das Ethikgremium, war die zentrale Antwort dieses Hauses auf Katar-Gate. Um genau diese Probleme zu beheben, die Selbstkontrolle im Parlament ein St眉ck weit zu 枚ffnen, die offensichtlich听nicht funktioniert, haben wir dieses Gremium geschaffen. Vor 眉ber zehn Monaten schon ist die Einigung mit acht EU鈥慖nstitutionen ratifiziert worden, und passiert ist seitdem nichts.

Wenn man jetzt mal guckt: Warum passiert nichts? Dann liegt das eben an der EVP, besonders an CDU/CSU. Ihr Vizepr盲sident beruft das erste Treffen nicht ein, zusammen mit den Rechtsau脽enparteien haben Sie im Haushaltsausschuss daf眉r gestimmt, dass das Parlament seine Rechnungen einfach nicht mehr bezahlt, was das Ethikgremium angeht. Was ist denn das f眉r ein Verst盲ndnis vom Rechtsstaat? Einfach die Rechnungen nicht zu bezahlen听鈥� das ist unfassbar!

Also wenn Sie das Ethikgremium nicht wollen, wenn Sie die Regeln nicht wollen, dann sagen Sie das offen. Treten Sie da aus, aber blockieren Sie nicht einfach alles, was irgendwie mit Transparenz und Integrit盲t zu tun hat.

听听Manon Aubry, au nom du groupe The Left. 鈥� Chers coll猫gues, entre les 茅lus corrompus qui s鈥檈n mettent plein les poches en acceptant les cadeaux des lobbyistes et ceux qui d茅tournent de l鈥檃rgent public, comme Marine Le Pen, franchement, il y a de quoi d茅go没ter les gens de la politique.

Ceux qui pr么naient 芦T锚te haute, mains propres!禄 ont aujourd鈥檋ui la t锚te baiss茅e et les mains sales. Ceux qui demandaient l鈥檌mpunit茅 z茅ro pour les d茅linquants se retrouvent pris 脿 leur propre jeu et la main dans le sac. Ceux qui 茅taient les premiers 脿 voler au secours de Viktor听Orban en appellent soudainement 脿 l鈥櫭﹖at de droit. J鈥檃voue qu鈥檌l est assez savoureux d鈥檈ntendre l鈥檈xtr锚me droite parler d鈥櫭﹖at de droit. Vous demanderez certainement encore 脿 votre copain Elon听Musk de voler 脿 votre secours?

Mais en r茅alit茅, le probl猫me est encore plus large. En France, dans mon pays, 26听ministres sont impliqu茅s dans des affaires depuis听2017, et au Parlement europ茅en les scandales se succ猫dent les uns apr猫s les autres, sans que cela suscite la moindre 茅motion.

Deux ans apr猫s les valises de billets du Qatar, place maintenant aux cadeaux luxueux et aux virements bancaires de la multinationale Huawei, que vous n鈥檕sez m锚me pas citer dans le titre de ce d茅bat. C鈥檈st le retour des perquisitions, des bureaux scell茅s et des enqu锚tes r茅v茅lant des pratiques mafieuses. Ce n鈥檈st pas une s茅rie Netflix, c鈥檈st juste l鈥櫭﹖at de notre d茅mocratie.

Et que s鈥檈st-il pass茅 entre ces deux affaires? Rien. Tout juste quelques mesurettes. Circulez, il n鈥檡 a rien 脿 voir. Tout le monde ici se tient par la barbichette pour se prot茅ger et, surtout, ne rien changer.

Mais vous pourrez compter sur mon groupe et moi pour continuer 脿 d茅noncer ces magouilles et tout changer, de la cave au grenier. Il est temps de faire le m茅nage et d鈥檈nfin faire primer l鈥櫭﹖hique sur le fric.

听听Marcin Sypniewski, w imieniu grupy ESN. 鈥� Patrz臋 na wasze dzia艂ania i temat debaty i czuj臋 si臋, jakby ju偶 by艂 鈥濸rima Aprilis鈥�. Pluralizm, transparentno艣膰 i walka z korupcj膮 to wa偶ne i potrzebne idee. Szkoda tylko, 偶e Komisja Europejska i Parlament Europejski post臋puj膮 dok艂adnie odwrotnie. M贸wicie o pluralizmie i o demokracji, a kibicujecie usuwaniu z wybor贸w lider贸w sonda偶y, nie dopuszczacie prawicowych grup do prowadzenia komisji czy obrad parlamentu. Nawet podczas w臋gierskiej prezydencji posuwali艣cie si臋 nawet do drobnych z艂o艣liwo艣ci jak dzieci w przedszkolu, nie szanuj膮c i nie zachowuj膮c neutralno艣ci.

M贸wicie o transparentno艣ci, ale obywatele nie maj膮 偶adnego wp艂ywu na dzia艂ania Unii Europejskiej tak naprawd臋. A przewodnicz膮ca Komisji Europejskiej toczy boje o ukrycie sms贸w, w kt贸rych negocjowa艂a z Pfizerem umow臋 na szczepionki. M贸wicie o walce z korupcj膮, podczas gdy znowu pod waszym nosem wybucha kolejna afera korupcyjna. To wszystko skutek nadmiaru w艂adzy urz臋dnik贸w. Przecie偶 ludzie, kt贸rzy do tego doprowadzili, nagle si臋 z tego nie wycofaj膮. Prawdziwa zmiana, prawdziwa transparentno艣膰 b臋dzie wtedy, jak odbierzemy w艂adz臋 urz臋dnikom i oddamy j膮 obywatelom. Niech 偶yje wolno艣膰!

听听Javier Zarzalejos (PPE). 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, se帽ora comisaria, el Parlamento Europeo es una instituci贸n muy importante pero no es una isla. Hablamos de los problemas que afectan a la transparencia en el Parlamento Europeo pero no podemos olvidarnos del contexto, y ese contexto hoy exige que la Uni贸n Europea sea cada vez m谩s visible y tenga una intervenci贸n creciente en las pol铆ticas contra la corrupci贸n.

En primer lugar, porque hay demasiados Gobiernos que en la Uni贸n Europea est谩n luchando para zafarse de controles democr谩ticos, demasiados Gobiernos que proponen leyes ad hoc para interferir en los procesos judiciales que afectan a corruptos, demasiados Gobiernos que hacen un uso partidista de la fiscal铆a.

En segundo lugar, porque Europol nos est谩 advirtiendo d铆a tras d铆a, informe tras informe, de un riesgo creciente de infiltraci贸n de la delincuencia organizada en la econom铆a real. Y eso tiene una traducci贸n, que es la corrupci贸n: corrupci贸n de los servidores p煤blicos, corrupci贸n de nuestras empresas, corrupci贸n de los legisladores.

Y, en tercer lugar, porque con estas premisas se est谩 intentando generar una cultura de impunidad y, por eso, nosotros, desde el Grupo del Partido Popular Europeo, y representando adem谩s tambi茅n a una voz muy mayoritaria del Parlamento, nos hemos opuesto a los indultos, a las amnist铆as a los corruptos, a reformas legislativas que suprimen o aligeran la penalizaci贸n de los delitos de corrupci贸n.

Ese tiene que ser un compromiso 鈥攊nsisto鈥� creciente y visible de la Uni贸n Europea.

听听Chlo茅 Ridel (S&D). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, on pensait avoir retenu les le莽ons du 芦Qatargate禄, mais non: c鈥檈st le retour des scell茅s au Parlement europ茅en. L鈥檈nqu锚te autour de l鈥檃ffaire Huawei r茅v猫le que des d茅put茅s auraient accept茅 entre 1听500 et听15听000听euros pour signer un courrier favorable 脿 Huawei, qui qualifiait la r茅gulation europ茅enne de la 5G de racisme technologique contre la Chine. C么t茅 Huawei, on assume. D鈥檃illeurs, on paye m锚me pour des amendements, disent-ils.

Je n鈥檃i pas de mots assez forts pour exprimer mon d茅go没t face 脿 la corruption et 脿 la cupidit茅 de certains d茅put茅s de cet h茅micycle. Ils entachent l鈥檌mage de notre institution et sapent encore un peu plus la confiance que les gens accordent 脿 leurs repr茅sentants politiques.

Dans cette affaire, la corruption arrive par un ancien assistant parlementaire parti travailler chez Huawei. Pourrait-on savoir en toute transparence combien d鈥檃nciens collaborateurs, d茅put茅s, commissaires sont partis travailler chez Huawei? Ensuite, nous voulons que le nouvel organe de l鈥橴E charg茅 des questions d鈥櫭﹖hique, qui semble tant d茅ranger la droite et l鈥檈xtr锚me droite de cet h茅micycle, soit enfin cr茅茅. Enfin, il faut donner les moyens aux r猫gles que nous nous fixons d鈥櫭猼re appliqu茅es. Il faut donc renforcer la justice et le Parquet europ茅en en 茅tendant enfin son domaine de comp茅tence aux affaires de corruption.

(L'oratrice accepte une question carton bleu)

听听Jo茫o Oliveira (The Left), Pergunta segundo o procedimento 芦cart茫o azul禄. 鈥� Senhora Presidente, Senhora Deputada Ridel, cada vez que h谩 um problema de corrup莽茫o, h谩 uma tenta莽茫o de p么r todo o Parlamento e todos os deputados sob suspeita. De resto, uma situa莽茫o que 茅 aproveitada pela extrema-direita para fazer o seu circo.

E a pergunta que lhe quero fazer 茅 esta: a senhora deputada n茫o considera que, perante qualquer circunst芒ncia de suspeita de corrup莽茫o, quem deve estar no banco dos r茅us 茅 o poder econ贸mico, s茫o as multinacionais e quem serve essas multinacionais a partir do poder pol铆tico? Em vez de se lan莽ar lama e suspei莽茫o sobre toda a gente, n茫o dev铆amos concentrarmo-nos naqueles que s茫o verdadeiramente os promotores e os benefici谩rios da corrup莽茫o, que s茫o os grandes interesses econ贸micos?

听听Chlo茅 Ridel (S&D), r茅ponse carton bleu. 鈥� Je ne suis pas totalement en d茅saccord avec vous, mais la corruption a toujours besoin d鈥檃u moins deux personnes, d鈥檃u moins deux parties pour advenir 鈥撎齣ci听les multinationales d鈥檜n c么t茅, vous avez raison, et les repr茅sentants politiques de l鈥檃utre.

Il faut donc que nous soyons irr茅prochables et capables de r茅sister au lobbying des multinationales 鈥撎齫u鈥檌l s鈥檃girait d鈥檈ncadrer davantage, d鈥檃illeurs听鈥�, et m锚me au-del脿, puisque cette affaire nous montre que, derri猫re la multinationale Huawei, il y a l鈥櫭塼at chinois.听Il faut donc que nos r猫gles de transparence prennent aussi en compte le pouvoir d鈥檌nfluen莽age des 脡tats 茅trangers.

Je maintiens par ailleurs mon propos, et je le redis: toute affaire de corruption, m锚me si elle ne concerne que quelques 茅lus de cet h茅micycle, entache l鈥檌mage de l鈥檈nsemble de notre institution.

听听Csaba D枚m枚t枚r (PfE). 鈥� Tisztelt Eln枚k Asszony! Rendben, akkor besz茅lj眉nk az 谩tl谩that贸s谩gr贸l! A Bizotts谩g eur贸milli贸kkal finansz铆roz olyan civilnek mondott szervezeteket, amelyek val贸j谩ban politikai tev茅kenys茅get v茅geznek.

De ha valaki egy 谩tfog贸 adatb谩zist szeretne ezekr艖l, akkor hi谩ba keresn茅. Mindezek miatt adatig茅nyl茅ssel fordultunk a Bizotts谩ghoz. Egy egyszer疟 list谩t k茅rt眉nk: mely NGO-kat finansz铆roznak, milyen c茅lb贸l 茅s mekkora 枚sszeggel?

Meg茅rkeztek a v谩laszok. A bizotts谩g nem hajland贸 kiadni ezeket a list谩kat. Azzal 茅rvelnek, hogy t煤l t谩g a k茅rt adatok k枚re, azzal hogy minden fenn van a neten 鈥� ami nem igaz egy茅bk茅nt 鈥�, 茅s nem konkr茅t szerz艖d茅seket k茅rt眉nk, hanem inform谩ci贸t, ami egy abszurd 茅rvel茅s.

A szerz艖d茅sek sz谩ma 煤gy tudjuk, hogy meghaladja a t铆zezret. Tal谩n nem mindenki tudja, de p谩r EP k茅pvisel艖 itt ebben a h谩zban, a K枚lts茅gvet茅si ellen艖rz艖 bizotts谩gban megkapta a list谩kat, de azt mondt谩k nekik, hogy ezeket nem hozhatj谩k nyilv谩noss谩gra. Mi茅rt? Mit titkolnak?

A Patri贸ta frakci贸 ezt nem hagyja annyiban, ha kell, perre is vissz眉k ezt az eg茅szet. Addig is annyit mondunk: ha akarnak valamit tenni a politikai korrupci贸 ellen, akkor kezdj茅k odahaza, hozz谩k nyilv谩noss谩gra a t谩mogatott szervezetek list谩j谩t.

(A felsz贸lal贸 hajland贸 v谩laszolni egy k茅kk谩rty谩s k茅rd茅sre)

听听Raquel Garc铆a Hermida-Van Der Walle (Renew), blue-card question. 鈥� Madam President, dear colleague, today, Viktor Orb谩n tweeted 'Je suis Marine'. Orb谩n is busy fighting culture wars while Hungarians suffer from his corruption. And I don't say that, Trump's people say that.

Health care is a mess. Education is bad, say two thirds of Hungarians. Inflation is up and people leave the country. So please do inform us if Viktor Orb谩n is Marine Le Pen, why hasn't been he been convicted yet?

听听Csaba D枚m枚t枚r (PfE), k茅kk谩rty谩s v谩lasz. 鈥� A magyar minisztereln枚k minden bizonnyal arra utalt, hogy politikai okokb贸l egyre t枚bb es茅lyes jel枚lt indul谩s谩t pr贸b谩lj谩k meg ellehetetlen铆teni. 脡s nem csak Franciaorsz谩g az egyetlen ilyen orsz谩g. A p茅ld谩kat hosszasan tudn谩nk sorolni.

Nos, ami a magyarorsz谩gi helyzetet illeti. Az a helyzet, hogy Magyarorsz谩gon intenz铆v vit谩k vannak azzal kapcsolatban, hogy a magyar 谩llam kikkel k枚t szerz艖d茅st, kiket t谩mogat. Ennek az az oka, hogy Magyarorsz谩gon az ilyen szerz艖d茅sek nyilv谩nosak, a miniszt茅riumok az ilyen szerz艖d茅seket rendszeresen k枚zz茅teszik.

Ezzel szemben az Eur贸pai Bizotts谩g azt a list谩t sem teszi k枚zz茅, hogy kiket t谩mogat 茅s mekkora 枚sszeggel, 茅s amikor arr贸l van sz贸, hogy vit谩zni kellene Reynders biztos korrupci贸s botr谩ny谩r贸l, akkor azt nem engedik napirendre.

听听Stefano Cavedagna (ECR). 鈥� Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, ero indeciso se intervenire al dibattito di quest'oggi, perch茅 mi sembra largamente una farsa per quello che sta accadendo.

Si parlerebbe di pluralismo democratico e di politiche anticorruzione in Europa. Eppure, qualche settimana fa, sono state annullate le elezioni in Romania: un candidato 猫 stato escluso dalla corsa, quando era peraltro primo tra tutti i sondaggi.听Vi sembra per voi questo pluralismo democratico?

Il commissario Breton, qualche settimana fa, 猫 entrato nelle elezioni tedesche dicendo che, se fosse stato eletto un partito che a lui non piace, probabilmente avrebbe chiesto di annullare queste elezioni. 脠 per voi questa una scelta di pluralismo democratico?

In Francia, Marine Le Pen oggi viene dichiarata ineleggibile per cinque anni senza avere un grado definitivo di giudizio, quindi neanche la sua possibilit脿 di fare appello o ricorso alla sentenza che 猫 arrivata, eppure gi脿 la sentenza politica 猫 definitiva. 脠 per voi questa una scelta di pluralismo democratico?

E allora no, parliamo di corruzione! La corruzione, purtroppo, 猫 troppo spesso all'interno di questi palazzi; lo abbiamo visto col caso del Qatargate 鈥� a dire il vero per colpa, largamente, di deputati che fanno parte dell'area di sinistra. Soldi per dire che le donne sono rispettate in Qatar.

Noi lavoriamo per un'Europa diversa, dove non ci sia corruzione, ci sia libert脿 e non si abbia paura di quello che scaturisce dalle elezioni democratiche.

听听Nikola Minchev (Renew). 鈥� Madam听President, Commissioner, dear colleagues, pluralism is the lifeblood of a real democracy. Without pluralism, there is no democracy. But in order to preserve it and strengthen it, we need to emphasise the importance of media freedom and media pluralism. They are essential to our democracies. They are enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights. They are key to holding power to account and to helping citizens make informed decisions.

On the anti-corruption agenda, regrettably, we have seen in EU Member States how brokers of influence in the judiciary, brokers of employment in the judiciary, brokers of justice pull the strings in the shadows of a nominally functioning judiciary. This is intolerable. We should be very clear: impaired independence equals no independence; selective justice equals no justice.

A key issue remains the lack of consistent results in cases of corruption at the highest levels of power. However, the EPPO is now investigating a potential such case in Bulgaria, and I urge both this House and the Commission to closely monitor this case.

听听Reinier Van Lanschot (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Madam听President, dear colleagues, the biggest corruption scandal in the history of the European 合法博彩网站: for over 12 years, Marine Le Pen and 24 others systematically stole more than EUR听4听million from the EU. They used it to grow their far-right party in France. Today they faced justice.

It's a great day. Not because a far-right politician can no longer run for the French presidency, but because an independent judge was able to rise above all the political considerations to make sure no one is above the law. In today's world, where more and more wannabe dictators attack judges, it shows that the separation of power still stands strong, and that in Europe the law applies to everyone equally.

But every time there is a scandal 鈥� a Qatar-, Huawei- or Le Pen-gate 鈥� our 合法博彩网站 becomes more famous for its weakest links, and I'm sick of it. So to my colleagues on the right who block new transparency rules, I say: Do not stop these rules. Stop corruption instead!

听听Konstantinos Arvanitis (The Left). 鈥� 螝蠀蟻委伪 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 魏伪蟿伪蟻蠂萎谓 蟽萎渭蔚蟻伪 伪魏慰蠉蟽伪渭蔚 蔚未蠋 蠈蟿喂 伪渭蠁喂蟽尾畏蟿蔚委蟿伪喂 魏伪喂 畏 纬伪位位喂魏萎 未喂魏伪喂慰蟽蠉谓畏. 危蟿慰 螘蠀蟻蠅魏慰喂谓慰尾慰蠉位喂慰 蟿蔚位喂魏维 蟺慰蟿苇 未蔚谓 蟺位萎蟿蟿蔚喂蟼. 螝伪喂 蟽蟿畏谓 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 螆谓蠅蟽畏, 渭蠈位喂蟼 苇蠁蠀纬蔚 畏 蟽魏蠈谓畏 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰 Qatargate路 魏伪喂 胃蠀渭委味蠅 纬喂伪 魏维蟺慰喂慰蠀蟼 蟺慰蠀 蟿慰 苇蠂慰蠀谓 尉蔚蠂维蟽蔚喂 蠈蟿喂 萎蟿伪谓 蔚渭蟺位蔚魏蠈渭蔚谓蔚蟼 蠂蠋蟻蔚蟼, 蠀蟺维位位畏位慰喂, 蔚蠀蟻蠅尾慰蠀位蔚蠀蟿苇蟼, 魏伪胃蠋蟼 魏伪喂 畏 螒谓蟿喂蟺蟻蠈蔚未蟻慰蟼. 螇蟻胃蔚 未蠀谓伪渭喂魏维 蟿慰 蟽魏维谓未伪位慰 蟿畏蟼 魏喂谓蔚味喂魏萎蟼 蟿畏位蔚蠁蠅谓委伪蟼, 魏伪喂 蟺蟻喂谓 魏伪位维 魏伪位维 伪蟻蠂委蟽慰蠀渭蔚 谓伪 蟽蠀味畏蟿维渭蔚, 渭伪蟼 萎蟻胃蔚 魏伪喂 苇谓伪 谓苇慰 魏伪魏蠈: 畏 伪蟺蠈蠁伪蟽畏 蟿慰蠀 纬伪位位喂魏慰蠉 未喂魏伪蟽蟿畏蟻委慰蠀 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 魏蠀蟻委伪 螞蔚蟺苇谓, 蟿畏谓 慰蟺慰委伪 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺伪胃慰蠉谓 魏维蟺慰喂慰喂 谓伪 未喂魏伪喂慰位慰纬萎蟽慰蠀谓.

危伪谓 蟺慰位位苇蟼 未蔚谓 蔚委谓伪喂 伪蠀蟿苇蟼 慰喂 蟽蠀渭蟺蟿蠋蟽蔚喂蟼 萎 蟿伪 伪蟿蠀蠂萎 纬蔚纬慰谓蠈蟿伪 纬喂伪 蟿慰 蟽蠉蟽蟿畏渭伪; 螤慰喂蔚蟼 蔚委谓伪喂 伪蠀蟿苇蟼 慰喂 未蠀谓维渭蔚喂蟼, 慰喂 慰蟺慰委蔚蟼 蟽蟿畏谓 伪蟻蠂喂魏萎 伪谓维纬谓蠅蟽畏 蟽蠀渭蠁蠅谓慰蠉谓 蟽蟿畏谓 伪谓维纬魏畏 慰蠀蟽喂伪蟽蟿喂魏蠋谓 渭苇蟿蟻蠅谓 胃蠅蟻维魏喂蟽畏蟼, 伪位位维 蟽蟿畏谓 蟺慰蟻蔚委伪 尉蔚蠂谓慰蠉谓; 危伪蟼 胃蠀渭委味蠅 蠈蟿喂 蟽蟿慰 蟺蟻慰畏纬慰蠉渭蔚谓慰 蟽魏维谓未伪位慰 Qatargate 畏 螒蟻喂蟽蟿蔚蟻维 蔚委蠂蔚 魏维谓蔚喂 蟽蠀纬魏蔚魏蟻喂渭苇谓蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蟻蔚伪位喂蟽蟿喂魏苇蟼 蟺蟻慰蟿维蟽蔚喂蟼. 危伪蟼 魏伪位蠋 谓伪 尉伪谓伪未喂伪尾维蟽蔚蟿蔚 蟺伪蟻伪未蔚喂纬渭伪蟿喂魏维 蟿慰谓 魏蠋未喂魏伪. 螘委蠂伪渭蔚 味畏蟿萎蟽蔚喂 谓伪 伪蟺伪纬慰蟻蔚蠉蔚蟿伪喂 蟽蟿慰蠀蟼 蟺蟻蠋畏谓 蔚蠀蟻蠅尾慰蠀位蔚蠀蟿苇蟼 伪渭苇蟽蠅蟼 渭蔚蟿维 蟿畏 胃畏蟿蔚委伪 蟿慰蠀蟼 谓伪 蔚蟻纬维味慰谓蟿伪喂 蟽蔚 蟽蠂蔚蟿喂魏维 位蠈渭蟺喂. 螣蠉蟿蔚 伪蠀蟿蠈 苇纬喂谓蔚. 螝伪喂 未蔚谓 蟿慰 位蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蔚蟺伪谓维蟽蟿伪蟽畏! 螘渭蔚委蟼 胃蔚蠅蟻慰蠉渭蔚 位慰喂蟺蠈谓 蠈蟿喂 蟿慰 蟽蠉蟽蟿畏渭伪 蔚委谓伪喂 蟽维蟺喂慰, 蠀蟺维蟻蠂蔚喂 未蠀蟽慰蟽渭委伪 魏伪喂 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 伪位位维尉蔚喂. 螒蟼 伪谓慰委尉蔚蟿蔚 蟿慰蠀位维蠂喂蟽蟿慰谓 魏维蟺慰喂慰 蟺伪蟻维胃蠀蟻慰, 苇蟿蟽喂 纬喂伪 蟿伪 蟺蟻慰蟽蠂萎渭伪蟿伪.

IN THE CHAIR: SOPHIE WILM脠S
Vice-President

听听Mary Khan (ESN). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin! Stellen Sie sich vor, Viktor Orb谩n w眉rde mit einem abgew盲hlten Parlament die Verfassung 盲ndern. Stellen Sie sich vor, er w眉rde eine halbe Stunde nach der Wahl s盲mtliche Wahlversprechen brechen, die er eine Stunde zuvor noch gegeben hat. Und stellen Sie sich vor, Viktor Orb谩n w眉rde seinen Mitb眉rgern das Wahlrecht entziehen, wenn sie sich regierungskritisch 盲u脽ern听鈥� was w盲re hier los in diesem Haus! Ein Aufschrei,听Revolution, Tr盲nen auf allen B盲nken, Sanktionen w盲ren l盲ngst beschlossen, denn die Demokratie sei in Gefahr.

Genau das passiert gerade in Deutschland. Ein abgew盲hltes Parlament ver盲ndert das Grundgesetz, verschuldet Generationen und hebelt demokratische Prinzipien aus, und hier im Haus听鈥� Schweigen. Weil es Ihrer Agenda dient, weil es nicht die falschen Parteien trifft, sondern genau die Stimmen, die Sie mundtot machen wollen. Wieder einmal zeigt sich: Die EU liebt die Demokratie und ihre B眉rger nur, wenn sie links und bunt sind.

听听Katar铆na Roth Neve膹alov谩 (NI). 鈥� V谩啪en谩 pani predsedaj煤ca, tak po膷煤vam, tak tu po膷煤vame r么zne veci, ktor茅 sa tu rozpr谩vaj煤, ale ja si mysl铆m, 啪e 膷o je najd么le啪itej拧ie je nastavi钮 znova d么veru v in拧tit煤cie aj E脷, nie 膹al拧铆mi org谩nmi, ale t媒m, 啪e budeme d么kladne vy拧etrova钮 to, 膷o sa stalo, a 啪e jednotlivci, ktor铆 s煤 zodpovedn铆, sa do膷kaj煤 spravodlivosti. A to znamen谩 aj pri Pfizergate a pri smsk谩ch pani predsedn铆膷ky Eur贸pskej komisie.

Nepotrebujeme 膹al拧ie org谩ny. Potrebujeme, aby fungovalo to, 膷o funguje, a mus铆me to v拧etko bra钮 ako individu谩lne zlyhania. Ja nechcem, aby sme my ako eur贸pska in拧tit煤cia hovorili, 啪e teraz to je v拧etko zl茅, a preto potrebujeme v拧etko prekop谩va钮, lebo naozaj je to individu谩lne zlyhanie. A takisto nie sme my ani prokur谩tori, ani sudcovia, ani kati, aby sme hovorili, 膷o sa m谩 sta钮, a nechajme to v拧etko na vy拧etrenie zodpovedn媒ch org谩nov. Nenah谩艌ajme bosorky, dodr啪ujme pravidl谩, neoso膷ujme sa navz谩jom, ale robme si svoju pr谩cu a kontrolujme hlavne Eur贸psku komisiu.

Mysl铆m si, 啪e nie nov茅 eur贸pske org谩ny pre etiku by mali by钮 v tomto Parlamente, ale mali by sme napr铆klad d么slednej拧ie sledova钮 to, 膷o sa deje v Eur贸pskej komisii, ktor铆 木udia s煤 za 膷o zodpovedn铆 a takisto hlavne ako funguj煤 mimovl谩dky v Eur贸pskej 煤nii, ktor茅 z铆skavaj煤 peniaze z eur贸pskych zdrojov a nie s煤 ochotn茅 informova钮 o svojej 膷innosti. To je to, kde by sme mali za膷a钮, nielen zelen茅 mimovl谩dky, ale napr铆klad aj tak谩 Transparency International.

听听Romana Tomc (PPE). 鈥� Gospa predsednica! Spo拧tovana gospa komisarka. Ko govorimo o demokraciji, integriteti in preglednosti in o boju proti korupciji, ne morem mimo slovenskega primera.

Dragi kolegi! Slovenski parlament ne deluje po na膷elu demokracije, ampak izrablja svojo premo膷 za uti拧anje opozicije. Predsednica izreka opomine. Koalicija enostavno odvzame besedo opozicijskim poslancem. Veliko pove tudi dejstvo, da je velika ve膷ina ...

(Predsedujo膷a je prekinila govornico in pojasnila, da ni na voljo tolma膷enja v angle拧膷ino.)

Ko govorimo o demokraciji, integriteti, preglednosti in boju proti korupciji v Evropski uniji, ne moremo mimo slovenskega primera.

Dragi kolegi! Slovenski parlament ne deluje po na膷elu demokracije, ampak izrablja svojo premo膷 za uti拧anje opozicije. Predsednica izreka opomine. Koalicija enostavno odvzame besedo opozicijskim poslancem, kadar jim kaj ni v拧e膷, kar govorijo. Veliko pove tudi dejstvo, da je velika ve膷ina sej parlamenta sklicanih izredno, zakoni pa se sprejemajo po hitrem postopku.

Imamo odli膷no zakonodajo s pomo膷jo... zakonodajo s podro膷ja korupcije, vendar korupcija 拧e vseeno cveti, je prisotna v velikem obsegu. To zaznava tudi OECD. Seveda z vladnimi politiki in predsednikom vlade na 膷elu.

Spra拧ujem se, seveda, kolegi, kdaj bo Evropska komisija, kdaj bodo na拧e institucije delovale z istimi merili za vse dr啪ave.

听听Evin Incir (S&D). 鈥� Madam President, colleagues, I am ashamed of the corruption scandals after corruption scandals. Robust institutions and clear regulations are essential for maintaining strong democracies. At the heart of that is transparency, which ensures credibility and accountability.

A troubling example is the President of the Commission's ongoing refusal to disclose her text messages with the CEO of a pharmaceutical company regarding the COVID-19 vaccine purchases. It is therefore perplexing that the Commission withdrew the regulation on public access to documents without offering an alternative.

Additionally, the recent corruption scandals involving Huawei is a direct assault on democracy and a disrespect to European voters. This underscored the urgent need for the ethic body that we Social Democrats and other groups have been advocating for. But I cannot understand why any group would oppose it. I can understand that the far right do not care about democracy, but it is a shame that the EPP is opposing this ethic body.

For those who value democracy, transparency should be a fundamental principle. Let's put an end to impunity!

听听Nikola Bart暖拧ek (PfE). 鈥� Pan铆 p艡edsedaj铆c铆, d谩my a p谩nov茅, Pfizergate, korup膷n铆 skand谩l Huawei, tajn茅 smlouvy o rozd臎len铆 pen臎z pro m茅dia, podpl谩cen铆 neziskov媒ch organizac铆 鈥� to jsou konkr茅tn铆 korup膷n铆 skand谩ly, kter茅 ot艡谩sly t铆mto Parlamentem i Evropskou komis铆. Jak m暖啪eme br谩t prohl谩拧en铆 o pot艡eb臎 v臎t拧铆 integrity, transparentnosti a boji proti korupci v谩啪n臎? Demokratick媒 pluralismus, kter媒 dnes vyz媒v谩me, ve skute膷nosti v t茅to instituci neexistuje. Byl nahrazen ideologick媒m dikt谩tem a vymezov谩n铆m se proti t臎m, kte艡铆 si dovol铆 m铆t vlastn铆 n谩zor. Tv谩艡铆te se, 啪e h谩j铆te demokracii a p艡itom uml膷ujete miliony voli膷暖 jen proto, 啪e nezapadaj铆 do jedin茅 povolen茅 拧ablony. A kdy啪 u啪 se mluv铆 o transparentnosti: Kde jsou smlouvy s Pfizerem a SMS, kter茅 rozhodly o zak谩zce za miliardy? Pro膷 bylo n臎kolik t媒dn暖 p艡ed volbami rozd臎leno p艡es 100 milion暖 eur m茅di铆m? Evrop拧t铆 ob膷an茅 si zaslou啪铆 zn谩t pravdu. Cht臎j铆, aby Evropsk谩 unie byla prostor spravedlnosti, ne pokrytectv铆. Pokud to s bojem proti korupci a demokraci铆 mysl铆te opravdu v谩啪n臎, za膷n臎te pros铆m u sebe a p艡esta艌te vylu膷ovat ty, kte艡铆 cht臎j铆 Evropu bezpe膷n臎j拧铆, suver茅nn臎j拧铆 a skute膷n臎 demokratickou.

听听Luis-Vicen葲iu Lazarus (NI). 鈥� Doamn膬 pre葯edint膬, doamn膬 comisar, am re葲inut dou膬 idei importante din discursul dumneavoastr膬 葯i anume c膬 democra葲ia reprezentativ膬 este bazat膬 numai pe alegeri libere 葯i c膬 cet膬葲enii trebuie s膬 se informeze - chiar e dreptul lor - dintr-o pluralitate de surse. 葮i dac膬 v-a葯 spune c膬 exact 卯n Rom芒nia, 葲ara de unde vin eu, aceste dou膬 principii fundamentale nu sunt respectate nicidecum!?

Pentru c膬, a葯a cum probabil 葯ti葲i, Rom芒nia este 葲ara care a realizat ceva spectaculos: 卯n 1989, a reu葯it s膬-葯i achite toate datoriile. Ast膬zi, dup膬 35 de ani - 葯i ea era o dictatur膬 - de democra葲ie avem 210 miliarde datorii. Cum s-a ajuns la aceast膬 situa葲ie? Din cauza politicienilor corup葲i, mincino葯i 葯i care, desigur, nu au respectat nimic, nici m膬car democra葲ia.

Deci ce democra葲ie era aceasta? Nu era o democra葲ie, era o dictatur膬 cu m膬nu葯i. Era o dictatur膬 care, atunci c芒nd a v膬zut c膬 pierde alegerile, a anulat alegerile, a interzis candida葲ii, 葯i-a dat m膬nu葯ile jos, a f膬cut praf Constitu葲ia 葯i a luat poporul la pumni, 卯n sensul c膬 a trimis organele de coerci葲ie diminea葲a s膬 aresteze oameni 葯i s膬 卯i perchezi葲ioneze, pentru c膬 au avut tupeul s膬-葯i aleag膬 pe cineva care chiar c芒葯tigase alegerile.

听听Sven Simon (PPE). 鈥� Madam President, colleagues, the European Union was founded on the rule of law, which means there are clear rules on how to deal with crimes. The following order needs to be applied: suspicion, investigation, Indictment and then, if necessary, conviction.

We often follow the process in the reversed order. But the fight for the rule of law can only be successfully waged if it is carried out using constitutional means. This includes the presumption of innocence, the separation of powers, and the immunity of Members of 合法博彩网站, which should be lifted in a legally sound procedure if there is cause to do so.

Where the rule of law is applied, it is also clear which institutions prosecute crimes: the police, the Public Prosecutor's Office and, at the European level, OLAF and EPPO. 合法博彩网站 must cooperate with these authorities and, if necessary, initiate its own investigations. However, this must also be done with within the framework of legal procedures.

In another case, the European Court of Justice has just confirmed that we have some catching up to do in our own House when it comes to legal procedures. Today, we discuss allegations again, although I would like to know what actually happened to the allegations of the past 鈥� Kaili, Krah, von der Leyen. Always the same pattern: accusation, arrest and then what is the outcome of this allegation?

By the way, the current case, like all the others, has nothing to do with morals or ethics. The accusation here is a criminal offence. And, as I said, we have OLAF, EPPO and the national authorities to investigate. They should now do their work and while they do, we should do our best to avoid giving the impression that the European Union is a corrupt institution. It is not.

(The speaker agreed to take a blue-card question)

听听Daniel Freund (Verts/ALE), Frage nach dem Verfahren der 鈥瀊lauen Karte鈥�. 鈥� Herr Simon, Sie haben jetzt gerade viel vom Rechtsstaat gesprochen. Geh枚rt zum Rechtsstaat aber nicht auch, dass man sich an eine Vereinbarung zwischen acht EU鈥慖nstitutionen, die geschlossen und ratifiziert ist, h盲lt? Geh枚rt zum Rechtsstaat nicht auch, dass man eine Rechnung, die aus dieser Abmachung resultiert, dann auch bezahlt? Ist denn dann im Rechtsstaat nicht der Weg, dass man, wenn man eine Vereinbarung nicht mag, einen Antrag stellt, dieses Abkommen zu verlassen, anstatt auf merkw眉rdigste Weise sich einfach nicht an geltendes Recht zu halten?

听听Sven Simon (PPE), Antwort auf eine Frage nach dem Verfahren der 鈥瀊lauen Karte鈥�. 鈥� Herr Kollege Freund! Mein Kollege Lor谩nt Vincze hat die Antwort bereits gegeben: Zum Rechtsstaat geh枚rt auch die Demokratie. Im Juni hat eine Wahl stattgefunden, und es gibt jetzt andere Mehrheiten in diesem Parlament. Wir werden das Verfahren jetzt durchf眉hren. Dann werden wir die Mehrheiten sehen und notfalls dieses Abkommen k眉ndigen, wenn es daf眉r im neuen Parlament eine neue Mehrheit gibt.

Sie m眉ssen sich an den Gedanken gew枚hnen, dass es Ihnen nicht gelungen ist, die Demokratie zu 眉berwinden, sondern mit Wahlen im Juni vergangenen Jahres hat eine Ver盲nderung stattgefunden, und genau die setzen wir um听鈥� notfalls durch K眉ndigung dieses Abkommens.

听听Hannes Heide (S&D). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, Frau Kommissarin! Neun ehemalige bzw. aktuelle EU-Abgeordnete sowie zw枚lf ehemalige Parlamentsassistenten wurden in einem Veruntreuungsprozess schuldig gesprochen. Und mit Huawei-Gate nach Katar-Gate steht einmal mehr im Raum, dass Drittstaaten und Unternehmen versuchen, mit unlauteren Praktiken demokratische Entscheidungsprozesse zu beeinflussen. Unter dem Eindruck des Skandals wurden 2022 vom Parlament Ma脽nahmen ergriffen, Integrit盲t und Transparenz wiederherzustellen und gegen Korruption anzuk盲mpfen, und letztes Jahr im Mai wurde ein unabh盲ngiges Ethikgremium geschaffen, um gemeinsame Standards aller EU-Institutionen festzulegen.

Dieses klare Mandat darf keinesfalls verw盲ssert werden. Ein effizient arbeitendes Ethikgremium st盲rkt den Parlamentarismus in diesem Haus und das Vertrauen in die Arbeit von uns Abgeordneten. Auch im Geltungsbereich der aktuell verhandelten Antikorruptionsrichtlinie braucht es strikte Pr盲ventivma脽nahmen unter Einbeziehung aller EU-Bediensteten, von uns Abgeordneten und allen Kommissionsmitgliedern.

Wir k枚nnen angesichts laufender Vorw眉rfe und Vorkommnisse nicht zur Tagesordnung 眉bergehen. Transparenz und Glaubw眉rdigkeit sind Gebot der Stunde.

听听Thierry Mariani (PfE). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, la veille du 1er听avril la Commission a d茅cid茅 d鈥檕rganiser un d茅bat sur le pluralisme d茅mocratique. Franchement, vous avez le go没t de l鈥檋umour et du calendrier: commencez d鈥檃bord par r茅agir au scandale de la condamnation de Marine Le Pen.

Je m鈥櫭﹖onne que la Commission, toujours prompte 脿 d茅noncer les abus du monde, soit aussi silencieuse quand le marteau de l鈥檌njustice frappe, sur notre continent, pour emp锚cher la d茅mocratie de s鈥檈xprimer.听En France aujourd鈥檋ui comme hier en Roumanie ou aux 脡tats-Unis, la justice est devenue l鈥檕util favori d鈥檜ne oligarchie qui agit contre les peuples. En France, elle vient de b芒illonner la voix de 11听millions de Fran莽ais, alors que tous les sondages s茅rieux placent Marine听Le听Pen largement en t锚te de la prochaine 茅lection pr茅sidentielle.听Il s鈥檃git d鈥檜n assassinat politique pur et simple, d鈥檜ne grave entrave 脿 la vie d茅mocratique, et dont le retentissement europ茅en est certain.

Nous voyons d鈥檃illeurs que Bruxelles pose un regard malicieux sur toutes ces condamnations puisqu鈥檈lles sont ses assurances-vie. Arr锚tez d鈥檃pplaudir les censeurs du peuple et occupez-vous des vrais tricheurs, ceux de votre majorit茅, ceux du 芦Qatargate禄. Vous parlez de pluralisme d茅mocratique? Moi, je vois un totalitarisme qui avance.

听听Andr谩s L谩szl贸 (PfE). 鈥� Az茅rt nem kicsit ironikus, amikor a br眉sszeli elit a demokr谩cia, az 谩tl谩that贸s谩g 茅s a korrupci贸 miatt agg贸dik. Vegy眉k 艖ket sorra! Demokr谩cia: m谩r a sokadik n茅pszer疟 jobboldali politikust pr贸b谩lj谩k jogi 煤ton ellehetetlen铆teni, most 茅ppen Marine Le Pent. Mi茅rt? Mert patri贸ta, mert ellene megy a globalista elitnek, 茅s az茅rt, mert 艖 a leges茅lyesebb eln枚kjel枚lt. 脕tl谩that贸s谩g: az Eur贸pai Bizotts谩g m茅g mindig nem hozta nyilv谩noss谩gra sem a vakcinaszerz艖d茅st, sem az azt el艖k茅sz铆t艖 sms-eit Ursula von der Leyennek. Korrupci贸: Amerik谩ban a legnagyobb korrupci贸s rendszert leplezik 茅ppen le, ami a USAID k枚r茅 茅p眉lt fel.

Viszont az 谩l-NGO-k 茅s a balliber谩lis m茅dia finansz铆roz谩s谩ban az EU is nyakig benne van. A baloldal pedig hiszt茅rikusan reag谩l, ha a magukat civilnek hazud贸 szervezetek finansz铆roz谩s谩t valaki sz谩mon k茅ri. A n茅pp谩rti, szocialista vagy 茅pp liber谩lis k茅pvisel艖k 茅s eur贸pai biztosok korrupci贸s 眉gyeib艖l pedig m谩r annyi van, hogy felsorolni sincs id艖.

V谩ltoz谩s kell Br眉sszelben! A korrupt, globalista elitet a patri贸t谩k fogj谩k lecser茅lni.

Catch-the-eye procedure

听听Sebastian Tynkkynen (ECR). 鈥� Madam President, corruption scandals are shaking this 合法博彩网站. A former MEP was convicted of misusing 合法博彩网站 funds. Foreign governments like Qatar and Morocco, and companies like Huawei have paid bribes for favourable votes.听Corruption and misuse of public funds must absolutely be condemned, regardless of political affiliation.

Colleagues, let us not forget a major source that has enabled massive corruption from EU funds. That is the post-COVID Economic Recovery Fund. Last year, in one investigation alone, a fraud of over EUR 600 million was uncovered. The lesson should be clear for all of us who want to fight corruption. The recovery fund is a horrible model to base future policies on.

听听Raquel Garc铆a Hermida-Van Der Walle (Renew). 鈥� Madam听President, I would like to start with reminding all of us here that two thirds of all Europeans believe that corruption is a major issue in the European Union in their countries, and that they expect us to combat this with all we have, with all tools, and they expect us to deliver.

So, I really have a very hard time 鈥� and I'm sorry that I'm not seeing many of my EPP colleagues here anymore tonight 鈥� but I'm having a hard time believing that the EPP is serving these citizens, when they are ready to sacrifice the EU ethics body which will be crucial in ensuring transparency within the EU institutions. I am also concerned that the European Commissioner has not mentioned this very prominently in her statement tonight.

So, please, EPP colleagues, stop siding with those who are obviously not interested in fighting corruption. Take responsibility. Give us the tools we need. Prevent even more scandals. Protect our reputation and protect the taxpayer.

听听Jo茫o Oliveira (The Left). 鈥� Senhora Presidente, a raiz da corrup莽茫o est谩 na natureza da pol铆tica que 茅 feita e nos interesses que serve.

Uma pol铆tica que esteja ao servi莽o dos trabalhadores e dos povos n茫o d谩 espa莽o 脿 corrup莽茫o. Pelo contr谩rio, 茅 a pol铆tica que serve os interesses econ贸micos e as multinacionais que 茅 a raiz da corrup莽茫o, da promiscuidade, do tr谩fico de influ锚ncias, das liga莽玫es entre o poder pol铆tico e o poder econ贸mico que minam os fundamentos da democracia e a credibilidade das suas institui莽玫es.

A resposta a dar 脿 corrup莽茫o n茫o pode ser o lan莽amento da suspeita generalizada, como se todos os eleitos e respons谩veis pol铆ticos tivessem as mesmas op莽玫es e comportamentos. Esse 茅 um discurso errado, que 茅 o discurso que serve 脿 extrema-direita. N茫o, os pol铆ticos n茫o s茫o todos iguais. H谩 uns que se colocam ao servi莽o do poder econ贸mico e das multinacionais, incluindo a extrema-direita.

Por muito que tentem disfar莽ar, a extrema-direita 茅 a tropa de choque do poder pol铆tico corrupto ao servi莽o dos grupos econ贸micos e das multinacionais. E vamos continuar a denunci谩-los e a dar-lhes combate.

A resposta a dar 脿 corrup莽茫o tem de ser essa: a da den煤ncia do combate a quem desvirtua o voto do povo para se p么r ao servi莽o do poder econ贸mico.

听听Fidias Panayiotou (NI). 鈥� Madam President, hello friends, I'm quite proud to say that the European 合法博彩网站 is very transparent. And you can all, all the people, the European citizens and everyone in the world, they can go in the website and they can find our salaries, they can find how much budget we are allowed to use, how much money we can spend, and this is very good. It builds trust and it's transparent. And it also builds expectations for the citizens.

But I'm unhappy because the European Commission doesn't have the same procedure. When you go to the Commissioners, you cannot see the salaries of the staff, how much budget they have and all this stuff. So this is not as transparent the European Commission. So I encourage the European Commission to be like the European 合法博彩网站, a lot more transparent, because this will build a lot of trust. I love you all.

(End of catch-the-eye procedure)

听听Ekaterina Zaharieva, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, honourable Members of the 合法博彩网站, thank you for really a lively debate. And it shows that this topic was a bit emotional in some of the statements, but it's really important. It's very, very important to protect our democracy. And it is a crucial moment. So thank you so much for your contributions.

And I can assure you that the Commission has really remained very committed to deliver a really good democracy shield with a broad consultation. As I stated, the public consultation was opened today and will continue eight weeks. And it's the commitment for us to ensure democratic pluralism, fight with corruption, transparency and strengthened integrity. It's really important for protection of our democracy. So thank you so much for your debate and for your contributions.

听听President. 鈥� Thank you, Commissioner. The debate is closed.