合法博彩网站

听听Der Pr盲sident. 鈥� Als n盲chster Punkt der Tagesordnung folgt die Aussprache 眉ber die Europ盲ische B眉rgerinitiative 鈥濬眉r den Schutz kosmetischer Mittel ohne Tierqu盲lerei und ein Europa ohne Tierversuche鈥� ().

听听Maria Spyraki, on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. 鈥� Mr President, Commissioner Jourov谩, the 鈥楽ave Cruelty鈥擣ree Cosmetics 鈥� Commit to a Europe without animal testing鈥� European Citizens鈥� Initiative has gained more than one听million signatures from at least seven Member States, and its organisers presented this case in a hearing before the ENVI Committee on 25听May, and you were present, Madam Commissioner.

Members of the initiative expressed strong concerns that, despite the existing legislation banning animal testing for cosmetics, in vivo testing is on the rise. The initiative calls on the Commission to protect and strengthen the cosmetic animal testing ban and initiate a legislative change for all cosmetic ingredients without resorting to animal testing, also to transform the EU chemical legislation, in particular REACH, by managing chemicals without the addition of new animal testing requirements.

Third, to modernise science in the EU by setting the scheme with a new legislative proposal in order to plot a roadmap to phase out all animal testing in the EU before the end of the current legislative term.

While most colleagues in the ENVI Committee supported the initiative, there are concerns focused on the issue of visibility and reliability of the alternatives, particularly with regards to health and pharmaceuticals. The need for more research, of course, before completely phasing out of practice is undeniable, according to my opinion.

It is important for us in ENVI to ensure full implementation of existing legislation and to propose new initiatives to promote alternatives to animal testing. We have to increase the uptake and implementation of non鈥攁nimal methods and also to overcome the default reliance on animal testing, particularly in light of the revision of [inaudible], which is in the pipeline, and also on REACH. We also need to ensure a consistent approach on the question of broadening the scope of the ban of non鈥擡U countries.

The Commission has also to do her job to accelerate the transition to non鈥攁nimal testing by developing the guidelines in cooperation with the OECD and to consider alternative methods in upcoming initiatives. Increased cooperation and investments in the use of innovative technologies in [inaudible] origin is needed.

Dear colleagues, the current strategy is not sufficiently and effectively implemented. We need a holistic approach for phasing out animal testing. We also are convinced that animal testing would be phased out in due time, recognising the current limitations, particularly to the pharma sector, for important and rare disease.

听听Mazaly Aguilar, en nombre de la Comisi贸n de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. 鈥� Se帽or presidente, esta iniciativa, que parte de un gran n煤mero de ciudadanos de los diferentes Estados, est谩 pidiendo a la Comisi贸n proteger y reforzar la prohibici贸n de la experimentaci贸n con animales para la industria de cosm茅ticos, pero tambi茅n est谩 pidiendo modernizar la ciencia de la Uni贸n Europea, eliminando progresivamente todos los ensayos con animales antes de que finalice la actual legislatura.

Desde una perspectiva cient铆fica, sobre todo en lo relacionado con las enfermedades cerebrales y, en concreto, con la enfermedad de Parkinson, una prohibici贸n total del uso de animales en la investigaci贸n biom茅dica ser铆a un error. Aunque se han logrado avances considerables utilizando alternativas a estos ensayos, la mayor parte de lo que puede aprenderse sobre el cerebro y su comportamiento sigue dependiendo directa o indirectamente de la investigaci贸n en modelos animales.

La eliminaci贸n, aunque sea progresiva, del uso de animales en la investigaci贸n m茅dica tendr铆a consecuencias negativas muy importantes y afectar铆a a los avances en la mejora de la calidad de vida de los muchos enfermos de estas afecciones cerebrales y neurol贸gicas. Tenemos que garantizar que la prohibici贸n de experimentaci贸n con animales para cosm茅ticos no se extienda a la investigaci贸n m茅dica.

听听Ana Miranda, en nombre de la Comisi贸n de Peticiones. 鈥� Se帽or presidente, se帽ora comisaria, en nombre de la Comisi贸n de Peticiones del Parlamento Europeo quisiera aprovechar esta oportunidad para felicitar a los organizadores por su buen trabajo y por haber recaudado el apoyo de 1,2 millones de europeos y europeas comprometidos por eliminar los ensayos con animales en la UE antes del final de la actual legislatura. La herramienta ICE (Iniciativa Ciudadana Europea) vuelve a dar visibilidad a las iniciativas ciudadanas promoviendo la democracia participativa.

Si bien el fomento formal de los m茅todos de ensayos en animales es exclusivo de la UE, existen obst谩culos burocr谩ticos para su aceptaci贸n. Su uso no se aplica adecuadamente y la financiaci贸n para su desarrollo est谩 siendo insuficiente. Algunos Estados miembros han adoptado medidas nacionales de ejecuci贸n que garantizan un elevado nivel de protecci贸n de los animales utilizados con fines cient铆ficos, mientras que otros solo aplican los requisitos m铆nimos.

A pesar de los avances logrados gracias a los ensayos con animales en el desarrollo de tratamientos m茅dicos y vacunas, incluyendo las vacunas contra la COVID-19, los ciudadanos europeos apoyan la prohibici贸n total y global del uso de animales en investigaci贸n. Es necesario reemplazar los ensayos con animales por m茅todos alternativos avanzados para cumplir con los objetivos sanitarios medioambientales establecidos en los distintos planes europeos.

Para lograr el objetivo de la Directiva 2010/63/UE, es crucial mejorar la coordinaci贸n entre los Estados miembros y las partes interesadas para desarrollar un plan de acci贸n a nivel de la UE que promueva la reducci贸n, el perfeccionamiento y la sustituci贸n de los procedimientos con animales vivos. Esto debe hacerse sin comprometer la protecci贸n de la salud humana y el medio ambiente, ni poner en riesgo la soberan铆a tecnol贸gica de la UE.

Es necesario fortalecer tambi茅n el Espacio Europeo de Investigaci贸n y basar el plan en la investigaci贸n realizada en la UE hasta ahora. Tambi茅n son necesarios mecanismos de financiamiento preferencial para los m茅todos sin animales en todas las iniciativas de investigaci贸n.

Las instituciones acad茅micas tienen un papel esencial y deben promover alternativas a los ensayos con animales, difundiendo nuevos conocimientos y pr谩cticas. Debe priorizarse la educaci贸n y capacitaci贸n de cient铆ficos.

Hay muchos elementos que analizar y estoy segura de que la presentaci贸n de hoy ser谩 muy 煤til y constructiva.

Puhetta johti HEIDI HAUTALA
varapuhemies

听听V臎ra Jourov谩, Vice-President of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, honourable Members of 合法博彩网站, thank you for the invitation to come and speak on behalf of the European Commission at this plenary debate on the initiative 鈥楽ave cruelty鈥攆ree cosmetics 鈥� Commit to a Europe without animal testing鈥�.

First of all, I would like to thank the European 合法博彩网站 for having organised a successful public hearing on 25听May, and on this occasion I also want to congratulate again the organisers for collecting 1.2 million signatures in record time. We heard from them their arguments. We listened very carefully. The organisers had a chance to present their initiative and the different Members to express their views also, and today鈥檚 plenary debate gives me and my colleagues preparing the Commission official reply another opportunity to listen carefully to the contributions and interventions from various Members.

This initiative reminds us that animal welfare is a significant concern for European citizens and a longstanding principle in European legislation. It requests to strengthen the animal testing ban under the Cosmetics Regulation. It then addresses all legislation requiring animal testing for chemical safety assessments, REACH legislation on plant protection products, biocides, pharmaceuticals and others. Lastly, it extends to basic and applied research, including biomedical research, training and education. On the first issue, related to cosmetics, it is important to note that the Cosmetics Regulation already bans animal testing for cosmetics products and ingredients for the safety assessment requirements of that regulation. However, other legislation may still require animal testing, for instance to assess hazards to workers鈥� health or the environment.

Regarding chemical safety assessments under different legislation, I would like to underline that already today animal testing is allowed only as a last resort. However, as experts of agencies like the European Chemicals Agency or Member State authorities confirm, we are not yet able to fully identify all hazards to health and the environment without some animal testing.

The good news is that we have seen significant progress in the development of non-animal methods in recent years. The workshop on new approach methodologies that the European Chemicals Agency organised with the Commission and stakeholders in June undoubtedly showed that the funding of research for alternatives to animal testing is highlighted in the initiative. I want to emphasise that the Commission already actively supports the development of such methods through research funding. Over the past two decades, the European Union has allocated over EUR听1 billion to more than 300 research projects.

Today鈥檚 exchange of views will feed into our reflection. We will present our general conclusions, as well as the actions that we intend to take in response to the three objectives of this initiative, in our communication later this month. I wish you a fruitful discussion.

听听Marlene Mortler, im Namen der PPE-Fraktion. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, Kollegen! Wir haben viel zu lange geschwiegen. Wir haben zu wenig 枚ffentlich informiert: Auch wenn wir Tierversuche in Europa einstellen听鈥� auch wenn sie noch notwendig sind听鈥� diese Forschung wird deshalb nicht aufh枚ren. Dann findet sie eben au脽erhalb Europas statt, zu schlechteren Bedingungen, zu niedrigeren Standards, und diese f眉hren wiederum zu weiteren Abh盲ngigkeiten von Drittstaaten 鈥� so Spitzenwissenschaftler letzte Woche in Br眉ssel.

Gott sei Dank sind nur 4听% der Versuche f眉r die Tiere schwer belastend. Doch alle Erkenntnisse kommen den Menschen oder den Patienten zugute. Aber auch Chemikalien wie L枚sungsmittel, Weichmacher, Konservierungsstoffe sowie Industriechemikalien m眉ssen auf ihre Giftigkeit getestet werden, bevor Menschen damit in Kontakt kommen.

Replace, reduce, refine: Die REACH-Verordnung verlangt die Pr眉fung tausender Stoffe. Sie sagt aber ausdr眉cklich, dass die Tierversuche auf ein notwendiges Minimum eingeschr盲nkt werden. Doch Computer-Modellierungen k枚nnen Grundlagenforschung noch nicht ersetzen, und Organoide nicht den gesamten menschlichen K枚rper mit seinem komplexen Zellsystem. Ich will jedenfalls nicht, dass wir unsere Probleme in andere Kulturkreise verlegen und dort statt an Tieren an Menschen getestet wird, die auf Geld angewiesen sind.

听听Niels Fuglsang, on behalf of the S&D Group. 鈥� Madam President, dear colleagues, dear Commissioner, today we stand on the shoulders of more than 1.4 million European citizens who have signed the Citizens鈥� Initiative and demand that we treat animals in a more respectful and a more decent way.

There is a broad consensus, even among politicians, that animals are sentient beings. Unfortunately, the current legislation does not reflect that obvious fact. The use of animals in cosmetics and in other chemical tests is an example of just that. Even though 鈥� as the Commissioner states 鈥� we have explicit legislation saying that we cannot use animals, banning animal tests when we talk about cosmetics, we still see it happening today.

According to the Commission鈥檚 own research, we have the number of animals being used for scientific purposes stagnating at 7.4 million animals per year. That鈥檚 not good enough. We need to use the alternatives. They exist. Therefore, I would like to ask the Commissioner: can we expect that the Commission finally commits to a coordinated plan to accelerate the transition to non鈥攁nimal science?

听听Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, en nombre del Grupo Renew. 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, se帽ora comisaria, quiero expresar en este turno mi rotunda oposici贸n al contenido de esta iniciativa y abogar por contestarla desde la transparencia y los criterios con los que trabajan los profesionales de la ciencia.

Desde hace a帽os, la Asociaci贸n Europea para la Investigaci贸n Animal promueve y cumple a rajatabla las normas de bienestar aplicables a los animales de laboratorio. Practica, adem谩s, el c贸digo de las tres erres: reemplazo, reducci贸n y refinamiento de los procedimientos, fomentando el uso de m茅todos alternativos.

驴Qu茅 hacer cuando no hay otra opci贸n? Escuchemos iniciativas como 芦Compromiso por la ciencia禄, impulsada por el Consejo Europeo del Cerebro, que nos pide apoyo para la investigaci贸n sobre las enfermedades neurodegenerativas y psiqui谩tricas. Recordemos, con la comunidad cient铆fica, que la experimentaci贸n con animales de laboratorio ha salvado y seguir谩 salvando vidas; entre ellas, sin ninguna duda, las de personas que, con su mejor voluntad, han podido firmar o apoyar铆an esta iniciativa ciudadana sobre el uso de animales para la ciencia.

听听Tilly Metz, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group. 鈥� Madam President, dear Commissioner, 10 years ago, the European Union took the decision to completely ban animal testing for cosmetic products and ingredients, becoming the first market in the world to do so. It might feel like a symbolic move or even an unimportant issue to some, but for me 鈥� as a European who deeply cares for animals 鈥� it was a proud and happy moment.

This will be one area where European consumers could buy products in good conscience because they didn鈥檛 have to worry if animals had suffered in labs. But then they discovered that this is not the case at all, as animal tests still are performed for workers鈥� safety. This is a legal inconsistency that is also causing damage to the credibility of the Union and to the trust of our citizens.

Alternative testing methods exist and continue to be developed, and we should support them more. So I wait for the Commission that the announced roadmap is really among the answers that we will give on this ECI, and that we have a concrete step to phase out animal testing.

听听El偶bieta Kruk, w imieniu grupy ECR. 鈥� Pani Przewodnicz膮ca! Blisko 1,5 miliona os贸b podpisa艂o europejsk膮 inicjatyw臋 obywatelsk膮 maj膮c膮 na celu zako艅czenie nie tylko okrutnego wykorzystywania zwierz膮t w testach kosmetycznych i chemicznych, lecz tak偶e wszelkich eksperyment贸w na zwierz臋tach. 呕adna inna europejska inicjatywa obywatelska nie otrzyma艂a takiego wsparcia w tak wielu krajach. Popierana jest r贸wnie偶 przez naukowc贸w i przemys艂. Oficjalnie w Europie nie prowadzi si臋 test贸w kosmetyk贸w na zwierz臋tach, to jednak nie ca艂a prawda. Rocznie ponad 10 milion贸w zwierz膮t cierpi podczas eksperyment贸w prowadzonych w unijnych laboratoriach. Wiele sk艂adnik贸w kosmetyk贸w to bowiem chemikalia, kt贸re podlegaj膮 innej regulacji zobowi膮zuj膮cej do prowadzenia test贸w na zwierz臋tach.

Tymczasem dzi艣 mo偶na ju偶 bezpiecznie obej艣膰 si臋 bez zadawania cierpie艅 zwierz臋tom. Nowoczesne, alternatywne metody sprawdzania kosmetyk贸w s膮 efektywniejsze ni偶 przestarza艂e i okrutne do艣wiadczenia na zwierz臋tach. Wesprzyjmy obywatelskie postulaty wzywaj膮ce Komisj臋 do zmiany przepis贸w i przedstawienia planu stopniowego wycofywania si臋 ze wszelkich eksperyment贸w na zwierz臋tach, wspierania rozwoju i wdra偶ania nowych technologii, w tym przekierowania finansowania z bada艅 na zwierz臋tach na metody alternatywne. Po艂贸偶my kres cierpieniu milion贸w zwierz膮t w europejskich laboratoriach.

听听Annika Bruna, au nom du groupe ID. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, les exp茅riences sur les animaux pour tester des cosm茅tiques sont interdites depuis听2013. Mais en听2020, la Commission, dans les affaires Symrise, a contraint les industriels 脿 tester les composants cosm茅tiques sur les animaux en invoquant le r猫glement REACH. Il nous faut donc sortir de l鈥檕rni猫re.

J鈥檃i d茅j脿 eu l鈥檕ccasion de pr茅senter des solutions 脿 la Commission, parmi lesquelles la possibilit茅 pour l鈥橝gence europ茅enne des produits chimiques d鈥檋omologuer elle-m锚me des m茅thodes alternatives aux tests sur les animaux, avec effet imm茅diat. La possibilit茅 茅galement pour le Laboratoire europ茅en pour les alternatives 脿 l鈥檈xp茅rimentation animale d鈥檋omologuer ses m茅thodes, l脿 encore avec un effet imm茅diat.

Je me suis rendue mardi dernier dans ce laboratoire qui est situ茅 en Italie, 脿 Ispra. Ces m茅thodes sont nombreuses 鈥撎齮oxico-g茅nomiques, organes sur puce et mod猫les de peau reconstitu茅e, bioimpression, mod茅lisation informatique ou encore simulation de m茅canismes neurologiques.

Aujourd鈥檋ui, la science avance plus vite que le droit. Les m茅thodes alternatives se d茅veloppent et sont reconnues comme fiables. Ce qui emp锚che de remplacer les tests sur les animaux, c鈥檈st l鈥檌nertie du droit et, il faut bien le reconna卯tre, l鈥檌nertie de la Commission europ茅enne. Plus d鈥檜n million de citoyens ont les yeux riv茅s sur vous et attendent des r茅ponses. Vous ne pouvez les ignorer.

听听Sun膷ana Glavak (PPE). 鈥� Po拧tovana predsjedavaju膰a, po拧tovana povjerenice, kolegice i kolege, o膷ito je da testiranje kozmetike na 啪ivotinjama jest praksa koja izaziva zabrinutost me膽u gra膽anima diljem Europske unije. Osu膽ujemo, naravno, patnju i okrutnost koju 啪ivotinje podnose u ime ljepote i sigurnosti proizvoda.

Prema podacima organizacije Prijatelji 啪ivotinja, 膷uli smo razli膷ite podatke i brojke danas, me膽utim, ovo je ne拧to najsvje啪ije, svake godine otprilike 35 tisu膰a 啪ivotinja u Europi te milijuni 拧irom svijeta izlo啪eni su patnji zbog testiranja. Govorimo o kozmeti膷kim proizvodima ili njihovim sastojcima. Praksa je to koja nije samo okrutna, ve膰 je, vi拧e smo puta 膷uli ovdje, i zastarjela.

Postoje brojne alternative koje su dostupne i koje su napredovale u posljednjim desetlje膰ima. Napredak znanosti i tehnologije omogu膰uje nam razvoj sofisticiranih in vitro metoda, organskih modela, ra膷unalnih simulacija koje su pouzdane, relevantne, a 拧to je najbitnije, i eti膷ne.

Europska unija ve膰 ima naprednu regulativu koja zabranjuje testiranje kozmeti膷kih sastojaka na 啪ivotinjama. Me膽utim, moramo i膰i dalje i pozivam stoga i Komisiju da napravi iskorak u tom smjeru prema gotovim kozmeti膷kim proizvodima koji se stavljaju na tr啪i拧te. Budimo predvodnici onih eti膷kih standarda o kojima toliko govorimo i poticanja industrije da razvije odr啪ive alternative za testiranje.

Ova inicijativa vrijedna je, predstavlja korak naprijed prema eti膷koj odr啪ivoj budu膰nosti i stoga je na nama da stvorimo Europu koja 拧titi 啪ivotinje i to upravo ja膷anjem i promicanjem inovacija, a u tom smjeru i拧li smo 膷etiri godine za vrijeme ove Komisije i ovog saziva parlamenta. Imamo novaca, imamo resurse, u膷inimo to.

听听Beatrice Covassi (S&D). 鈥� Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, sembra incredibile che ancora oggi nel 2023 dobbiamo discutere in questo Parlamento dell'utilizzo di animali come cavie per prodotti cosmetici, quando, gi脿 negli anni '90, venivano lanciate le prime linee non testate su animali.

L'Unione europea 猫 all'avanguardia: tra il 2004 e il 2013 abbiamo messo al bando i test sugli animali per i prodotti cosmetici e i loro ingredienti; nel 2007 abbiamo incluso nei trattati il principio del benessere degli animali. Questo mentre nel mondo l'80听% dei paesi non ha ancora normative in merito.

Eppure le nostre regole di fatto vengono eluse perch茅 i cosmetici contengono anche ingredienti che ricadono sotto altre normative e vengono ancora testati su animali.

Oggi l'innovazione tecnologica ci permette gi脿 di testare in modo sicuro senza che nessun essere vivente debba soffrirne.

Da qui la lodevole iniziativa dei cittadini europei che discutiamo oggi, con oltre un milione e duecentomila firme e che lancia un fondato allarme.

Allora, cari colleghi, niente timidezze: abbracciamo una volta e per sempre un concetto di bellezza pi霉 profondo, dove il rispetto di ogni forma di vita possa essere terapeutico e trasformativo non solo dei nostri corpi, ma anche della nostra anima.

La nostra Europa sar脿 bella e grande nella misura in cui sapr脿 essere sempre pi霉 dalla parte del rispetto della natura, degli ecosistemi, degli esseri viventi.

Pyynn枚st盲 my枚nnett盲v盲t puheenvuorot

听听Stanislav Pol膷谩k (PPE). 鈥� Pan铆 p艡edsedaj铆c铆, opravdu ohromuj铆c铆 po膷et ob膷an暖 n谩s vyz媒v谩 k tomu, abychom zakro膷ili proti testov谩n铆 na zv铆艡atech. M谩me samoz艡ejm臎 ke zv铆艡at暖m jako 啪iv媒m tvor暖m projevovat respekt a 煤ctu.

J谩 se p艡ipojuji k t臎mto ob膷an暖m. Je nepochybn茅, 啪e zde m谩me dvoj铆 legislativu, jednu, kter谩 zakazuje toto testov谩n铆, a druhou, kter谩 艡铆k谩, 啪e pro chemik谩lie mus铆 povinn臎 doj铆t k tomu testov谩n铆 na zv铆艡eti. Mysl铆m si, 啪e je to takov谩 z谩konn谩 forma obch谩zen铆, a bohu啪el mnoz铆 producenti farmaceutick茅ho pr暖myslu tuto v媒jimku vyu啪铆vaj铆 velmi 膷asto.

Se z谩jmem jsem si poslechl vystoupen铆 pan铆 komisa艡ky. Jsem velmi r谩d, 啪e upozornila na ty alternativn铆 metody a dokonce jejich mo啪nosti financov谩n铆 v媒zkumu, kter茅 jsou k dispozici. Poj膹me b媒t skute膷n臎 d暖sledn臎j拧铆. Zvy拧me sankce za pr谩v臎 to obch谩zen铆 z谩kona. Mo啪n谩, 啪e dokonce zp艡铆sn臎me tu legislativu. To je, mysl铆m, jednozna膷n茅. A m臎li bychom skute膷n臎 zak谩zat n臎kterou kosmetiku na trhu, kter谩 nedodr啪铆 tato stanoven谩 pravidla.

听听Caroline Roose (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, le r猫glement cosm茅tique de听2009 interdit des exp茅rimentations animales sur les produits cosm茅tiques et sur leurs ingr茅dients. Il interdit aussi la mise sur le march茅 de produits qui avaient 茅t茅 test茅s ou dont les ingr茅dients avaient 茅t茅 test茅s sur des animaux. Pourtant, l鈥橝gence europ茅enne des produits chimiques continue d鈥檈xiger de certains fabricants qu鈥檌ls recourent 脿 des tests sur les animaux. Rien aujourd鈥檋ui ne peut justifier que des tests sur les animaux soient pratiqu茅s pour des cosm茅tiques.

Cela fait des ann茅es que les fabricants et les associations de protection des animaux alertent sur ce scandale. Aujourd鈥檋ui, gr芒ce 脿 la mobilisation des dizaines d鈥檃ssociations et plus d鈥檜n million de signatures de citoyennes et citoyens europ茅ens, nous en discutons enfin! Merci 脿 eux.

L鈥檌nitiative citoyenne europ茅enne nous invite aussi 脿 nous poser plus globalement la question des tests sur les animaux. Les alternatives existent. Elles sont m锚me souvent plus fiables que les tests sur les animaux. Pourtant, les tests sur les animaux diminuent 脿 peine. Nous avons besoin d鈥檜n plan d鈥檃ction complet qui m锚le formation des professionnels, financements publics et r茅glementation pour r茅duire significativement les tests sur les animaux.

听听Mick Wallace (The Left). 鈥� Madam President, firstly, to debunk one of the key myths about this European Citizens鈥� Initiative, there have been claims that this proposal will be harmful and limiting to medical research with an outright ban on animal testing, which is untrue. Despite the ban on animal testing on cosmetic products it is an ongoing practice with certain ingredients that require testing by the European Chemicals Agency.

This initiative outlines a clear consumer demand to reduce mandatory chemical testing, with a proposal to transform and innovate EU chemicals regulation to ensure that human health and the environment are protected by managing chemicals without the barrier of new animal testing requirements, as outlined in a report by the European Environment Bureau.

This needs to be achieved through REACH regulation, which is responsible for testing requirements. So the revision of REACH legislation is crucial. But when will it happen? The Commission has been promising this for a while.

听听Clare Daly (The Left). 鈥� Madam President, I know we heard from the Commissioner that the Commission is listening. But if you are, I wonder, are you really hearing? Because we know that the Commission and the European Chemicals Agency are still standing over animal testing under the REACH Regulation for chemicals used exclusively in cosmetics, for which there is a possibility of workforce exposure or a risk to the environment.

Now, this is a double standard and a joke. As colleagues have said, the European Union lauded the fact that we became a world leader 10听years ago in banning cosmetics products being tested on animals. It is time for us to stop the double standards now. It is beyond time for us to respect the demand of the 1.2 million citizens who are demanding a legally binding act to end animal testing for cosmetic products and ingredients under REACH, including the safety of workers, and to put an end to the serious legal inconsistency that has been going on over the past period.

As colleagues have said, there are alternatives. We need to commit to a Europe without animal testing, and I really hope that the Commission comes up with a roadmap for that.

(Pyynn枚st盲 my枚nnett盲v盲t puheenvuorot p盲盲ttyv盲t)

听听V臎ra Jourov谩, Vice-President of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, honourable Members, let me thank you for this rich debate with interesting perspectives and well considered statements from the different speakers. Your views on the different aspects of the Citizens鈥� Initiative bring useful insights that we will take into account when finalising our response to the initiative.

So I can confirm I was not only listening; I also heard you. For us policy-makers, the support of citizens for a policy direction is key. This initiative reminds us how animal welfare remains a strong concern for European citizens, and we take that call very seriously. And not only this initiative 鈥� we had several initiatives in a row which concerned animals.

Coming back to this one, we are now in the final stage of the European Citizens鈥� Initiative cycle, which is to finalise the Commission鈥檚 formal answer to the initiative, covering our general conclusions as well as any action we may intend to take to follow up. This debate is timely because the College will have to adopt the communication by 25听July, so very soon.

This will be the second initiative replied to this month, as the Commission adopted last week its reply to another initiative concerning animal welfare, which aims at ending the trade of loose shark fins 鈥� a horrible practice, barbaric. I think that it鈥檚 high time we react.

Before concluding, I am also glad to share with you that the Commission is currently examining one other successful initiative 鈥� Fur-Free Europe 鈥� to which the Commission will reply before the end of this year.

Citizens鈥� engagement in the EU is growing ever stronger and I hope that it will also be reflected in the next elections. Demonstrating that we take seriously their concerns and clearly explaining our decisions will be essential for their trust in the EU and their continued involvement. That is why I am always repeating that I admire the initiatives and the efforts of the organisers, because this is really a very important contribution to our work. Thank you again for this fruitful debate.

听听Puhemies. 鈥� Keskustelu on p盲盲ttynyt.