合法博彩网站

PRESIDENZA: ROBERTA METSOLA
President

听听President. 鈥� I declare resumed the session of the European 合法博彩网站 adjourned on Thursday, 15 June 2023.

(The sitting opened at 17.00)

听听President. 鈥� Dear colleagues, good afternoon and welcome back to Strasbourg. I have three points from my end. First of all, this weekend marked 500 days since the start of Russia鈥檚 large-scale invasion of Ukraine; 500 days of Ukraine beating the odds; 500听days of Ukrainians inspiring the world; 500 days of Europe and a democratic world united like at few other times in history.

I want to say how proud I am that our European 合法博彩网站 has stood with Ukraine and its people from day one. That this House has led calls for Ukraine to be granted EU candidate status. That our 合法博彩网站 has pushed forward the political momentum for humanitarian, military and financial support. That when Ukraine needed us to help procure generators, our pan-European Generators of Hope campaign provided heating and light. That when it came to legislation, the deals we have reached with the Council on the joint procurement in defence and the Act in Support of Ammunition Production will make a real difference. And here, let me thank all those colleagues who are involved in these critical files.

So let me say again: this 合法博彩网站, our European Union, will continue to stand shoulder to shoulder with the courageous people of Ukraine for as long as it takes for Ukraine, for Europe, for democracy, for liberty to prevail.

We are also marking 100听days since the illegal detention in Russia of Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich. As we have done since his capture, let me reiterate once again our solidarity, our support and our determination to see him freed immediately.

In the next days, we will also mark 300 weeks since the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia. This House will continue to call for justice to be served. Because being a journalist takes courage, but this 合法博彩网站 is committed to ensuring that we have the right legislation in place to make sure that people should not be forced to be brave to do it. And that is our commitment.

Dear colleagues, last Saturday, we also witnessed what happened with the violent disruption of Tbilisi Pride in Georgia. Anti-LGBTIQ rhetoric, disinformation and violence have no place in these debates, and the lives and safety of the LGBTIQ community must be a priority. People deserve to live their lives free from fear. From here, I wanted to signal our solidarity and our support.

听听President. 鈥� The minutes and the texts adopted of the sitting of 15听June are available. Are there any comments? That does not seem to be the case, therefore the minutes are approved.

听听President. 鈥� Following the resignations of 脕lvaro Amaro and Peter van Dalen, and on the proposal of the Committee on Legal Affairs, 合法博彩网站 takes note, in accordance with the Rules of Procedure, of the vacancy of their seats from 7听July and 4听September 2023 respectively, and will inform the national authorities concerned thereof.

The competent authorities of Germany have notified me of the election of Thomas Rudner to the European 合法博彩网站, replacing Ismail Ertug with effect from 3听July 2023.

The competent authorities of Portugal have notified me of the election of Carlos Coelho to the European 合法博彩网站, replacing 脕lvaro Amaro with effect from 7听July 2023.

I would like to welcome these two colleagues and recall that they take their seats in 合法博彩网站 and its bodies in full enjoyment of their rights pending the verification of their credentials.

听听President. 鈥� On the proposal of the Committee on Legal Affairs, 合法博彩网站 has verified the credentials of Nikos Papandreou with effect from 3听May 2023.

听听President. 鈥� I have also received a request from the competent authorities in Greece for the parliamentary immunity of Georgios Kyrtsos to be waived. This request is referred to the Committee on Legal Affairs.

听听President. 鈥� The S&D and The Left Groups have notified me of decisions relating to changes to appointments within committees and delegations. These decisions will be set out in the minutes of today鈥檚 sitting and take effect on the date of this announcement.

听听President. 鈥� Several committees have decided to enter into interinstitutional negotiations pursuant to Rule 71(1) of the Rules of Procedure. The reports, which constitute the mandates for the negotiations, are available on the plenary webpage and their titles will be published in the minutes of the sitting.

Pursuant to Rule 71(2), Members or political groups reaching at least the medium threshold may request in writing by tomorrow, Tuesday, 11听July, at midnight, that the decisions be put to the vote. If no request for a vote in 合法博彩网站 is made within the deadline, the committees may start the negotiations.

听听President. 鈥� I would like to inform you that, since the adjournment of 合法博彩网站鈥檚 session on 15听June, I have signed, together with the President of the Council, one act adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure, in accordance with Rule 79.

I would also like to inform you that on Wednesday I shall sign, together with the President of the Council, four acts adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure. The titles of the acts will be published in the minutes of this sitting.

听听President. 鈥� The AGRI Committee has transmitted a corrigendum to a text adopted by 合法博彩网站. Pursuant to Rule 241(4), this corrigendum will be deemed approved unless, no later than 24 hours after its announcement, a request is made by a political group or Members reaching at least the low threshold that it be put to the vote.

The corrigendum is available on the plenary webpage. Its title will be published in the minutes of the sitting.

听听President. 鈥� I would also like to announce that, pursuant to Rule 47(2) of the Rules of Procedure, I have declared admissible two proposals for a Union act:

1. a proposal for a Union act on the establishment of an independent authority to investigate the side effects of COVID-19 vaccines. This proposal is referred to the ENVI Committee as responsible committee;

2. a proposal for a Union act on the need to amend EU legislation to address the problems facing livestock farms as a result of bovine tuberculosis. This proposal is referred to the AGRI Committee as responsible committee and to the ENVI Committee for an opinion.

听听President. 鈥� We now come to the order of business. The final draft agenda, as adopted by the Conference of Presidents on 6听July pursuant to Rule 157, has been distributed.

I understand that Fran莽ois Alfonsi wants to make a point of order.

听听Fran莽ois Alfonsi (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, nos coll猫gues d茅put茅s Carles听Puigdemont et Antoni听Com铆n n鈥檕nt pas rejoint Strasbourg pour participer 脿 cette session. La raison en est l鈥檃bsence de garanties sur le respect de leur immunit茅 parlementaire au moment de gagner le Parlement en France. Cette session est tr猫s importante et chaque vote va compter pour l鈥檃doption, ou non, de textes parmi les plus importants de la mandature. Leur absence est donc pr茅judiciable 脿 la vie d茅mocratique de notre Parlement.

Ils vous ont sollicit茅e pour obtenir un soutien, comme il est de tradition quand certains d鈥檈ntre nous sont en butte 脿 des privations de nos libert茅s d鈥櫭﹍us et pour obtenir aussi une intervention ferme pour faire en sorte qu鈥檌ls puissent participer 脿 notre session. Nous regrettons vivement que vous ne l鈥檃yez pas fait et nous vous posons une question solennelle: pourquoi?

听听President. 鈥� Now we move to the changes to the agenda.

For Wednesday, the ID Group has requested that a Commission statement on 鈥楾he continuing repression of the democratic opposition in Germany, particularly remarks by the President of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution鈥� be added as the seventh item in the afternoon, before the debates on breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law.

As a consequence, the sitting would be extended to 23.00. I give the floor to Christine Anderson to move the request on behalf of the ID Group.

听听Christine Anderson, im Namen der ID-Fraktion. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin! In Deutschland sieht eine weisungsgebundene Beh枚rde, der sogenannte Verfassungsschutz, seine Aufgabe darin, die Opposition zu behindern und zu verhindern. Pr盲sident Haldenwang sagte k眉rzlich, es sei nicht allein seine Aufgabe, die Umfragewerte der AfD zu senken. Nein, es ist gar nicht seine Aufgabe, dies zu tun.

Dies ist eine ganz klare Kompetenz眉berschreitung und au脽erdem eine eklatante Verletzung des Neutralit盲tsgebots. Zu diesem Ergebnis kommen zumindest mehrere renommierte Staats- und Verfassungsrechtler. Eine der Regierung unterstellte Beh枚rde, die die Opposition verunglimpft und sie systematisch behindert, sch眉tzt nicht die Verfassung, sondern sch眉tzt die Regierung und stellt somit einen klaren, verfassungswidrigen Tatbestand dar.

Derart eklatante und offensichtliche Verst枚脽e gegen Prinzipien von Demokratie und Rechtsstaatlichkeit kann und darf dieses Haus nicht unkommentiert und auch nicht unwidersprochen stehen lassen. Ich beantrage daher im Namen der ID-Fraktion hierzu eine entsprechende Erweiterung der Tagesordnung f眉r eine Aussprache und eine Stellungnahme der Kommission hierzu f眉r Dienstagnachmittag mit entsprechender Verl盲ngerung der Sitzung am Dienstag.

听听President. 鈥� Does any colleague want to speak against this request? No? Then we vote by roll call.

(合法博彩网站 rejected the request)

The agenda therefore remains unchanged. The agenda is adopted and the order of business is thus established.

VORSITZ: KATARINA BARLEY
痴颈锄别辫谤盲蝉颈诲别苍迟颈苍

(Die Sitzung wird um 17.14听Uhr wieder aufgenommen.)

听听Die Pr盲sidentin. 鈥� Als n盲chster Punkt der Tagesordnung folgt die gemeinsame Aussprache听鈥� 鈥濬it f眉r 55鈥� und Industrieemissionen听鈥� 眉ber

鈥� den Bericht von Radan Kanev im Namen des Ausschusses f眉r Umweltfragen, 枚ffentliche Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit 眉ber den Vorschlag f眉r eine Richtlinie des Europ盲ischen Parlaments und des Rates zur 脛nderung der Richtlinie 2010/75/EU des Europ盲ischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 24.听November 2010 眉ber Industrieemissionen (integrierte Vermeidung und Verminderung der Umweltverschmutzung) und der Richtlinie 1999/31/EG des Rates vom 26.听April 1999 眉ber Abfalldeponien ( 鈥� C9-0144/2022 鈥� ) (A9-0216/2023),

鈥� den Bericht von Radan Kanev im Namen des Ausschusses f眉r Umweltfragen, 枚ffentliche Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit 眉ber den Vorschlag f眉r eine Verordnung des Europ盲ischen Parlaments und des Rates 眉ber die Berichterstattung 眉ber Umweltdaten von Industrieanlagen und zur Einrichtung eines Industrieemissionsportals ( 鈥� C9-0145/2022 鈥� ) (A9-0211/2023),

鈥� den Bericht von Petar Vitanov im Namen des Ausschusses f眉r Verkehr und Tourismus 眉ber den Vorschlag f眉r eine Verordnung des Europ盲ischen Parlaments und des Rates 眉ber den Aufbau der Infrastruktur f眉r alternative Kraftstoffe und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinie 2014/94/EU des Europ盲ischen Parlaments und des Rates ( 鈥� C9-0331/2021 鈥� ) (A9-0234/2022),

鈥� den Bericht von J枚rgen Warborn im Namen des Ausschusses f眉r Verkehr und Tourismus 眉ber den Vorschlag f眉r eine Verordnung des Europ盲ischen Parlaments und des Rates 眉ber die Nutzung erneuerbarer und kohlenstoffarmer Kraftstoffe im Seeverkehr und zur 脛nderung der Richtlinie 2009/16/EG ( 鈥� C9鈥�0333/2021 鈥� ) (A9-0233/2022) und

鈥� den Bericht von Niels Fuglsang im Namen des Ausschusses f眉r Industrie, Forschung und Energie 眉ber den Vorschlag f眉r eine Richtlinie des Europ盲ischen Parlaments und des Rates zur Energieeffizienz (Neufassung) ( 鈥� C9-0330/2021 鈥� ) (A9-0221/2022).

听听Radan Kanev, rapporteur. 鈥� Madam听President, dear colleagues, I would like to start my presentation of the IED report with rather political than technical considerations. And I would first say that we all see in the last weeks we face quite a dangerous polarisation in our vote here in the hemicycle, in this House. A polarisation which endangers the political legitimacy of our decisions, or at least diminishes this political legitimacy before trilogues and before the general public. So far, in the work on IED in the ENVI Committee, we did not fall in this trap and we found a balanced approach. Therefore, I would very much like to thank all my colleague shadow rapporteurs, Mr听Chahim, Mr听Wiezik, Ms听Paulus, Ms听Zalewska, Mr听Lancini and Ms听Matias.

We maintained a rather strong ambition to protect health and the environment for European citizens but, at the same time, we avoided further red tape and bureaucracy for our industry. We maintained the trend to industrial transformation and transition agreed with the Green Deal, climate law and 鈥楩it for 55鈥� package but, at the same time, we encourage innovation throughout Europe as the sole solution to the dangers that we face for our industry.

I must say, as we all know, there is one major point in the report where we could not find an agreement. We found no compromise. And it is the agricultural part of the report. It is the inclusion of higher thresholds of animal rearing in the scope of the report and, most particularly, the inclusion of cattle rearing in the scope of the report. There was no compromise here in my point of view, mostly because of miscommunication before the report was presented by the Commission to both the Council and 合法博彩网站. Therefore, it is a rather natural political conflict that we face.

And I must say, although we had no compromise at ENVI level, we moved a lot towards each other. The alternatives that we will face tomorrow in the plenary are not showing polarisation within our House. They are showing different approaches, different views, but also a very good faith and good spirit between partners who disagree on certain topics.

Therefore the vote, whatever the outcome, will show democratic differences within our society. By the way, I cannot make a forecast on the vote, and I鈥檓 sure no one in this House can make it. We don鈥檛 know the outcome, but what we know is that it will show the democratic representation of our Members for their constituents back home.

This is the reason 鈥� and here is where I went with my first four minutes 鈥� the reason for my call for moderation, whatever the outcome of this controversial vote, because we achieved a lot 鈥� a lot for both the benefit of our citizens and our industry. And we moved as close as we could on the controversial issues.

Therefore, I call that, at the end of the day, no matter the outcome of this controversial part of the vote, we still support Industrial Emissions Directive and Industrial Emissions Portal for the good of our citizens鈥� health, of our environment and of our competitive, innovative industry.

听听袩械褌褗褉 袙懈褌邪薪芯胁, 写芯泻谢邪写褔懈泻. 鈥� 袚-卸芯 袩褉械写褋械写邪褌械谢, 屑芯斜懈谢薪芯褋褌褌邪 懈 褌褉邪薪褋锌芯褉褌褗褌 褋邪 芯褌 卸懈蟹薪械薪芯 蟹薪邪褔械薪懈械 蟹邪 械胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻懈褌械 谐褉邪卸写邪薪懈 懈 泻谢褞褔芯胁懈 蟹邪 械胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻邪褌邪 懈泻芯薪芯屑懈泻邪. 袧邪褉械写 褋 锌芯谢蟹懈褌械 芯斜邪褔械, 褌褉邪薪褋锌芯褉褌褗褌 薪邪薪邪褋褟 懈 芯谐褉芯屑薪懈 褖械褌懈 胁褗褉褏褍 芯泻芯谢薪邪褌邪 褋褉械写邪, 芯褌谐芯胁芯褉械薪 械 蟹邪 薪邪写 械写薪邪 褌褉械褌邪 芯褌 锌邪褉薪懈泻芯胁懈褌械 械屑懈褋懈懈 胁 袝胁褉芯锌邪.

小懈谐褍褉械薪 褋褗屑, 褔械 褋褌褉械屑械卸褗褌 薪邪 胁褋械泻懈 械写懈薪 褔芯胁械泻 胁 褌邪蟹懈 蟹邪谢邪 械 褌褉邪薪褋锌芯褉褌薪懈褟褌 褋械泻褌芯褉 写邪 褋械 锌褉芯屑械薪懈 褌邪泻邪, 褔械 写邪 斜褗写械 胁褋械 锌芯-屑邪谢泻芯 蟹邪胁懈褋懈屑 芯褌 懈蟹泻芯锌邪械屑懈 谐芯褉懈胁邪, 写邪 写芯锌褉懈薪邪褋褟 蟹邪 写械泻邪褉斜芯薪懈蟹邪褑懈褟褌邪 薪邪 泻芯薪褌懈薪械薪褌邪, 写邪 褋褗褏褉邪薪懈 泻芯薪泻褍褉械薪褌芯褋锌芯褋芯斜薪芯褋褌褌邪 褋懈 斜械蟹 写邪 谢懈褕邪胁邪 斜械写薪懈褌械 懈 褍褟蟹胁懈屑懈褌械 芯褌 锌褉邪胁芯褌芯 薪邪 写芯褋褌褗锌薪邪 屑芯斜懈谢薪芯褋褌.

袗泻褌懈胁薪芯褌芯 胁薪械写褉褟胁邪薪械 薪邪 胁褗蟹芯斜薪芯胁褟械屑懈褌械 懈蟹褌芯褔薪懈褑懈 懈 薪懈褋泻芯胁褗谐谢械褉芯写薪懈 谐芯褉懈胁邪 褌褉褟斜胁邪 写邪 胁褗褉胁懈 褉褗泻邪 蟹邪 褉褗泻邪 褋 懈蟹谐褉邪卸写邪薪械褌芯 薪邪 谐械芯谐褉邪褎褋泻邪 褍锌谢褗褌薪械薪邪 懈薪褎褉邪褋褌褉褍泻褌褍褉薪邪 屑褉械卸邪 蟹邪 蟹邪褉械卸写邪薪械 薪邪 械谢械泻褌褉芯械薪械褉谐懈褟 懈 锌褉械蟹邪褉械卸写邪薪械 褋 谐芯褉懈胁芯, 蟹邪 写邪 褋械 褍谢械褋薪懈 薪邪胁谢懈蟹邪薪械褌芯 薪邪 锌邪蟹邪褉邪 薪邪 锌褉械胁芯蟹薪懈 褋褉械写褋褌胁邪 褋 薪懈褋泻懈 懈 薪褍谢械胁懈 械屑懈褋懈懈 懈 写邪 褋械 薪邪褋褗褉褔邪褌 褏芯褉邪褌邪 写邪 谐懈 锌芯谢蟹胁邪褌. 袙 泻褉邪泄薪邪 褋屑械褌泻邪 褌芯胁邪 械 褑械谢褌邪 薪邪 褌芯蟹懈 褉械谐谢邪屑械薪褌, 写邪 屑芯谐邪褌 胁褋懈褔泻懈 锌褉械胁芯蟹薪懈 褋褉械写褋褌胁邪, 斜懈谢芯 褌芯 锌谢邪胁邪褌械谢薪懈 懈谢懈 胁褗蟹写褍褏芯锌谢邪胁邪褌械谢薪懈, 写邪 褋械 锌褉懈写胁懈卸胁邪褌 褋 谢械泻芯褌邪 锌芯 芯褋薪芯胁薪懈褌械 械胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻懈 褌褉邪褋械褌邪.

袩芯谢褍褔懈褏 写芯褋懈械褌芯 褋谢械写 泻邪褌芯 谐芯谢褟屑邪 褔邪褋褌 芯褌 褉邪斜芯褌邪褌邪 斜械褕械 褋胁褗褉褕械薪邪 懈 薪械 懈褋泻邪屑 写邪 褋懈 锌褉懈写邪胁邪屑 胁邪卸薪芯褋褌, 薪芯 胁 泻邪褔械褋褌胁芯褌芯 褋懈 薪邪 泻芯芯褉写懈薪邪褌芯褉 薪邪 S&D 锌芯 褌褉邪薪褋锌芯褉褌邪, 懈褋泻邪屑 写邪 懈蟹泻邪卸邪 斜谢邪谐芯写邪褉薪芯褋褌 芯褌 屑芯械 懈屑械 懈 芯褌 懈屑械褌芯 薪邪 胁褋懈褔泻懈 泻芯谢械谐懈 泻褗屑 袠褋屑邪懈谢 袝褉褌褍谐, 褔芯胁械泻褗褌 褋 芯褋薪芯胁械薪 锌褉懈薪芯褋 蟹邪 褌械蟹懈 屑薪芯卸械褋褌胁芯 屑邪谢泻懈 懈 薪械 褔邪泻 褌芯谢泻芯胁邪 屑邪谢泻懈 锌芯斜械写懈, 泻芯懈褌芯 袝胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻懈褟褌 锌邪褉谢邪屑械薪褌 褍褋锌褟 写邪 锌芯褋褌懈谐薪械 胁 褏芯写邪 薪邪 锌褉械谐芯胁芯褉懈褌械. 袠 邪泻芯 屑懈 锌芯蟹胁芯谢懈褌械, 斜懈褏 懈褋泻邪谢 写邪 懈蟹谢芯卸邪 胁 褉械蟹褞屑械 褋邪屑芯 薪褟泻芯懈 芯褌 褌褟褏.

袧邪 锌褗褉胁芯 屑褟褋褌芯, 褉械谐谢邪屑械薪褌褗褌 胁械褔械 芯斜褏胁邪褖邪 泻谢褞褔芯胁懈褟 谢懈锌褋胁邪褖 械谢械屑械薪褌 芯褌 锌褉械写谢芯卸械薪懈械褌芯 薪邪 袝胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻邪褌邪 泻芯屑懈褋懈褟, 邪 懈屑械薪薪芯 卸械谢械蟹芯锌褗褌薪懈褟 褌褉邪薪褋锌芯褉褌, 泻芯泄褌芯 胁褋懈褔泻懈 芯褌写邪胁薪邪 褋屑械 锌褉懈械谢懈 蟹邪 褌褉邪薪褋锌芯褉褌邪 薪邪 斜褗写械褖械褌芯. 袪邪蟹胁懈褌懈械褌芯 薪邪 邪谢褌械褉薪邪褌懈胁薪懈褌械 谐芯褉懈胁邪 械 胁邪卸薪芯 蟹邪 卸械谢械蟹芯锌褗褌薪懈褟 褋械泻褌芯褉, 泻褗写械褌芯 锌芯褉邪写懈 褉邪蟹谢懈褔薪懈 锌褉懈褔懈薪懈 写懈褉械泻褌薪邪褌邪 械谢械泻褌褉懈褎懈泻邪褑懈褟 薪械 胁懈薪邪谐懈 械 胁褗蟹屑芯卸薪邪. 袙械褔械 懈屑邪屑械 薪邪谢懈褔薪懈 褌械褏薪芯谢芯谐懈懈 蟹邪 蟹邪屑褟薪邪 薪邪 写懈蟹械谢芯胁懈褌械 胁谢邪泻芯胁械 褋 械谢械泻褌褉懈褔械褋泻懈, 褋 褌邪泻懈胁邪 蟹邪写胁懈卸胁邪薪懈 芯褌 斜邪褌械褉懈懈 懈谢懈 褋 胁芯写芯褉芯写薪懈. 袠屑械薪薪芯 褉邪蟹胁懈褌懈械褌芯 薪邪 褌械蟹懈 褌械褏薪芯谢芯谐懈懈 懈蟹懈褋泻胁邪 懈蟹谐褉邪卸写邪薪械 薪邪 锌芯写褏芯写褟褖邪 懈薪褎褉邪褋褌褉褍泻褌褍褉邪 蟹邪 蟹邪褉械卸写邪薪械 薪邪 褌械褉懈褌芯褉懈懈褌械 薪邪 褋褌褉邪薪懈褌械 褔谢械薪泻懈.

袧邪 胁褌芯褉芯 屑褟褋褌芯, 懈屑邪屑械 蟹邪胁懈褕械薪懈 褑械谢懈 锌芯 芯褌薪芯褕械薪懈械 薪邪 懈薪褎褉邪褋褌褉褍泻褌褍褉邪褌邪 蟹邪 蟹邪褉械卸写邪薪械 薪邪 谢械泻芯褌芯胁邪褉薪懈褌械 锌褉械胁芯蟹薪懈 褋褉械写褋褌胁邪, 泻芯褟褌芯 褌褉褟斜胁邪 写邪 芯褋懈谐褍褉褟胁邪 30% 锌芯胁械褔械 械谢械泻褌褉懈褔械褋褌胁芯 薪邪 胁褋械泻懈 褉械谐懈褋褌褉懈褉邪薪 械谢械泻褌褉懈褔械褋泻懈 邪胁褌芯屑芯斜懈谢 芯褌 1 泻懈谢芯胁邪褌 薪邪 1,3 泻懈谢芯胁邪褌邪 懈 芯褌 0,66 薪邪 0,8 锌褉懈 锌谢褗谐-懈薪 褏懈斜褉懈写懈褌械. 袨褌褔懈褌邪 褋械 褎邪泻褌芯褉褗褌 褉邪蟹褋褌芯褟薪懈械, 褌邪泻邪 褔械 锌褉械蟹 2025 谐. 写邪 屑芯卸械 写邪 芯褋懈谐褍褉懈屑 褋胁芯斜芯写薪芯 褌褉邪薪褋谐褉邪薪懈褔薪芯 锌褗褌褍胁邪薪械 褋 写芯褋褌邪褌褗褔薪芯 蟹邪褉褟写薪懈 褋褌邪薪褑懈懈 锌芯 锌褗褌褟. 袪械谐谢邪屑械薪褌褗褌 锌褉械写胁懈卸写邪 芯褖械 褉邪蟹锌芯谢邪谐邪薪械褌芯 薪邪 蟹邪褉褟写薪懈 褋褌邪薪褑懈懈. 袩褉懈 褌械卸泻芯褌芯胁邪褉薪懈褌械 邪胁褌芯屑芯斜懈谢懈 褋褗褖芯 褋械 锌褉械写胁懈卸写邪褌 锌芯胁械褔械 褋褌邪薪褑懈懈 褋 褍胁械谢懈褔械薪 械薪械褉谐懈械薪 泻邪锌邪褑懈褌械褌.

袧邪 褌褉械褌芯 屑褟褋褌芯, 薪芯 薪械 锌芯 蟹薪邪褔械薪懈械, 褋邪 褌械泻褋褌芯胁械褌械, 薪邪褋芯褔械薪懈 泻褗屑 锌芯褌褉械斜懈褌械谢懈褌械. 袨锌械褉邪褌芯褉懈褌械 薪邪 斜褗褉蟹懈 蟹邪褉褟写薪懈 褑械薪褌褉芯胁械 薪邪写 50 泻懈谢芯胁邪褌邪 褖械 褌褉褟斜胁邪 写邪 芯褋懈谐褍褉褟胁邪褌 胁褗蟹屑芯卸薪芯褋褌懈 蟹邪 锌谢邪褖邪薪械 褋 泻邪褉褌邪. 袩芯胁懈褕邪胁邪 褋械 懈 锌褉芯蟹褉邪褔薪芯褋褌褌邪 蟹邪 薪邪褔懈薪邪 薪邪 褌邪泻褋褍胁邪薪械 薪邪 蟹邪褉械卸写邪薪械褌芯. 袧邪锌褉懈屑械褉 锌褉懈 斜褗褉蟹懈褌械 蟹邪褉褟写薪懈 褋褌邪薪褑懈懈 褑械薪邪褌邪 褌褉褟斜胁邪 写邪 褋械 斜邪蟹懈褉邪 懈蟹褑褟谢芯 薪邪 褑械薪邪褌邪 薪邪 泻懈谢芯胁邪褌褔邪褋, 写芯泻邪褌芯 锌褉懈 斜邪胁薪懈褌械 懈屑邪 褉邪蟹谢懈褔薪懈 芯锌褑懈懈 斜懈谢芯 褌芯 薪邪 泻懈谢芯胁邪褌褔邪褋, 薪邪 屑懈薪褍褌邪, 薪邪 褋械褋懈褟 懈谢懈 锌褉懈 写褉褍谐懈 泻芯屑锌芯薪械薪褌懈. 小褗蟹写邪胁邪薪械褌芯 薪邪 械胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻邪 褌芯褔泻邪 蟹邪 写芯褋褌褗锌 褖械 锌芯胁懈褕懈 芯褋胁械写芯屑械薪芯褋褌褌邪 薪邪 械胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻懈褌械 谐褉邪卸写邪薪懈 懈 褖械 锌芯屑芯谐薪械 写邪 锌褗褌褍胁邪褌 械褎械泻褌懈胁薪芯, 芯褋懈谐褍褉褟胁邪泄泻懈 褑褟谢芯褋褌薪邪 懈薪褎芯褉屑邪褑懈褟 蟹邪 懈薪褎褉邪褋褌褉褍泻褌褍褉邪褌邪 薪邪 邪谢褌械褉薪邪褌懈胁薪懈褌械 谐芯褉懈胁邪. 袪械谐谢邪屑械薪褌褗褌 锌褉械写胁懈卸写邪 芯褖械 褉邪蟹锌芯谢邪谐邪薪械褌芯 薪邪 蟹邪褉褟写薪懈 褋褌邪薪褑懈懈 蟹邪 胁芯写芯褉芯写 褋 胁褗蟹屑芯卸薪芯褋褌 蟹邪 薪邪写谐褉邪卸写邪薪械 褋谢械写 锌褉械芯褑械薪泻邪. 小褗褖械胁褉械屑械薪薪芯 褋械 芯谐褉邪薪懈褔邪胁邪 写芯 屑懈薪懈屑褍屑 懈薪褎褉邪褋褌褉褍泻褌褍褉邪褌邪 蟹邪 胁褌械褔薪械薪 锌褉懈褉芯写械薪 谐邪蟹 锌褉懈 褋褍褏芯锌褗褌薪懈褟 懈 胁芯写薪懈褟 褌褉邪薪褋锌芯褉褌. 袟邪锌邪蟹胁邪褌 褋械 褌械泻褋褌芯胁械褌械 蟹邪 芯褋懈谐褍褉褟胁邪薪械 薪邪 械谢械泻褌褉懈褔械褋泻芯 蟹邪褏褉邪薪胁邪薪械 薪邪 谢械褌懈褖邪褌邪, 蟹邪写褗谢卸懈褌械谢薪懈 懈蟹懈褋泻胁邪薪懈褟 懈屑邪屑械 蟹邪 褉邪蟹锌芯谢邪谐邪薪械 薪邪 褋褌邪薪褑懈懈 蟹邪 胁芯写芯褉芯写 懈 褌邪泻邪 薪邪褌邪褌褗泻, 懈 褌邪泻邪 薪邪褌邪褌褗泻.

袣邪褌芯 褑褟谢芯 褋锌芯褉邪蟹褍屑械薪懈械褌芯 械 斜邪谢邪薪褋懈褉邪薪芯 懈 褋褗写褗褉卸邪 蟹薪邪褔懈褌械谢薪芯 锌芯-锌褉芯谐褉械褋懈胁薪懈 锌芯蟹懈褑懈懈 胁 褋褉邪胁薪械薪懈械 褋 锌褗褉胁芯薪邪褔邪谢薪芯褌芯 锌褉械写谢芯卸械薪懈械 薪邪 袣芯屑懈褋懈褟褌邪. 袙褟褉胁邪屑, 褔械 锌褉芯谐褉械褋懈胁薪懈褟褌 锌芯写褏芯写 褌褉褟斜胁邪 写邪 芯褋褌邪薪械 胁 芯褋薪芯胁邪褌邪 薪邪 锌褉芯屑械薪懈褌械, 褋 泻芯懈褌芯 写薪械褋 褔械褉褌邪械屑 械写薪芯 锌芯-褔懈褋褌芯 懈 锌芯-褍褋褌芯泄褔懈胁芯 斜褗写械褖械 蟹邪 袝胁褉芯锌邪 懈 薪械泄薪懈褌械 谐褉邪卸写邪薪懈.

听听J枚rgen Warborn, 贵枚谤别诲谤补驳补苍诲别. 鈥� Fru talman! Kommission盲r, 盲rade kollegor. Det 盲r med stolthet jag st氓r h盲r idag och markerar m氓lg氓ngen efter n盲stan tv氓 氓rs arbete med att f枚rhandla fram lagen om sj枚fartens klimatomst盲llning. Det 盲r ett banbrytande beslut som EU 盲r p氓 v盲g att fatta. Aldrig tidigare har det utarbetats ett s氓 omfattande och effektivt ramverk f枚r att ta itu med utsl盲ppen fr氓n sj枚farten. Aldrig tidigare har n氓gon global makt med EU:s tyngd satt kraft bakom orden om att sj枚farten ska g枚ra sin del av klimatomst盲llningen.

Kommissionen har gjort ett gediget f枚rberedelsearbete, och d盲refter vidtog processen i parlamentet i oktober 2021. Jag, som huvudf枚rhandlare, inledde en dialog med m氓nga olika parter, med hamnar, rederier, fackf枚reningar, milj枚organisationer och br盲nsleleverant枚rer fr氓n alla delar av Europa. Sedan vidtog intensiva f枚rhandlingar h盲r i parlamentet, f枚ljt av trepartsf枚rhandlingar med ministerr氓det. Tidigt p氓 morgonen den 23 mars n氓dde vi en 枚verenskommelse.

Texten som nu ligger p氓 bordet 盲r utan motstycke v盲rldens mest ambiti枚sa klimatlag f枚r sj枚farten. Rederierna kommer gradvis att beh枚va byta till renare br盲nslen och koppla upp sina fartyg till landstr枚m f枚r att minska skadliga luftf枚roreningar i de mest trafikerade hamnarna. Som jag sa 盲r 枚verenskommelsen ambiti枚s, men den 盲r ocks氓 realistisk. Som ansvarsfulla politiker m氓ste vi ta h盲nsyn till m氓nga olika perspektiv: givetvis klimatet, men ocks氓 sociala aspekter och f枚retagens konkurrenskraft. 75听procent av v氓r handel g氓r med fartyg. Europeisk industri 盲r allts氓 helt beroende av en fungerande, tillg盲nglig och prisv盲rd sj枚fart. Alla f枚rst氓r att klimatomst盲llningen kommer att kosta pengar, men takten vi genomf枚r den i, och s盲ttet vi g枚r det p氓, det spelar roll f枚r notan.

D盲rf枚r har vi lagt en utsl盲ppsminskningsplan som b枚rjar v盲ldigt modest, f枚r att sedan ta ordentlig fart efter 2035. Det ger branschen en tydlig f盲rdriktning samtidigt som den f氓r rimliga tidsm盲ssiga och praktiska f枚ruts盲ttningar f枚r att genomf枚ra de investeringar som kr盲vs. I nya effektivare skrov och motorer, i nya br盲nsle- och produktionsanl盲ggningar och bunkringsinfrastruktur, och genom att bygga nya f枚rs枚rjningskedjor och forts盲tta forska.

Genom den gradvisa infasningen beaktar vi ocks氓 den sociala och ekonomiska dimensionen. Vi ger andrum till sektorn och undviker d盲rmed infasningsproblem och kortsiktiga pristoppar. Detta 盲r naturligtvis mycket viktigt i inflationstider, att vi skyddar familjer och f枚retag fr氓n orimliga pris枚kningar. Vi har ocks氓 tagit h盲nsyn till geografiska s盲rarter, s氓 att lagstiftning inte inneb盲r orimliga b枚rdor f枚r n氓gon enskild region. D盲rf枚r har vi specialbest盲mmelser f枚r isklassade fartyg, f枚r sm氓 枚ar och f枚r de yttersta randomr氓dena.

Ledstj盲rnan f枚r mig i f枚rhandlingarna har varit praktisk genomf枚rbarhet och att f氓 mesta m枚jliga utv盲xling f枚r varje satsad euro. Att EU:s plan ska bli s氓 framg氓ngsrik att resten av v盲rlden vill ta efter.

Vi har redan sett de f枚rsta stegen i samma riktning. N盲r Internationella听sj枚fartsorganisationen IMO sammantr盲dde f枚rra veckan antog man en ambiti枚s utsl盲ppsminskningplan. Nu g盲ller det att trycka p氓 f枚r att den ocks氓 ska utmynna i konkreta och bindande globala br盲nsleregler, s氓 att de stora orden blir verklighet.

EU visar att det g氓r. Med fartygsbr盲nslef枚rordningen vi ska r枚sta om i morgon tar Europa, med aktiv handling, t盲ten i omst盲llningen av sj枚farten. Eftersom lagen kommer att till盲mpas oavsett vilken flagg ett fartyg har, s氓 fort de anl枚per en europeisk hamn, f氓r vi ett globalt f枚rhandlingstryck, som jag 盲r 枚vertygad kommer att sporra ytterligare framsteg inom IMO. F枚r inget rederi som vill trafikera Europa kommer l盲ngre att kunna blunda f枚r den helt n枚dv盲ndiga klimatomst盲llningen. De kommer beh枚va anpassa sig.

Nu pekar vi allts氓 med hela handen vart氓t vi ska. Vi garanterar sj枚fartssektorn l氓ngsiktiga spelregler och f枚ruts盲gbarhet, s氓 att den kan samla kraft att investera. Vi utformar reglerna s氓 att rederierna och hamnarna kan fokusera sina resurser p氓 de 氓tg盲rder som ger st枚rst klimatnytta och mest pang f枚r pengarna.

Innan jag avslutar vill jag s盲ga att jag tycker att vi har uppn氓tt en v盲ldigt bra balans i den h盲r 枚verenskommelsen som ligger p氓 bordet, och jag vill rikta ett varmt tack till alla ledam枚ter och personal som har bidragit till arbetet, liksom till kollegerna i r氓det och p氓 kommissionen f枚r er professionalism och samarbetsanda. Jag vill uppmana alla kollegor att st枚dja 枚verenskommelsen vid omr枚stningen i morgon.

听听Niels Fuglsang, rapporteur. 鈥� Madam President, dear colleagues, over the last couple of years, remarkable changes in Europe鈥檚 energy system have taken place. Our dependency on Russian natural gas has fallen significantly. In just four months, from August to November 2020, natural gas consumption fell by 20听% compared to the same period the year before. Three Member States even managed to reduce natural gas consumption by more than 40听%. This was something that experts said could not be done.

We proved them wrong. We did it. And, friends, now we need to do it again because the energy crisis is not over, the climate crisis is certainly not over and we are looking at hard times ahead, when we look at the climate but also if we just look a couple of years ahead when it comes to our energy system 鈥� the prices might rise again, hitting the most vulnerable people in our society.

That is why we need to make some structural changes. We need to make sure that our energy system is efficient. And that is what we set out to do in this directive. I think we have proven here in Europe that we have been able to react swiftly when it comes to our energy system, and we need to prove that one more time.

This Energy Efficiency Directive that we have agreed on 鈥� the broad majority in the European 合法博彩网站, the main groups of the European 合法博彩网站 鈥� sets out for some significant changes in our energy system.

First of all, we agree that we need to reduce energy consumption by 11.7听% in 2030. That is a big challenge, but it can be done if we make sure to insulate our homes, make sure to roll out more district heating and make sure that we use the excess heat which is created from factories and data centres that use much electricity but also create a lot of heat, which is now often being wasted, we need to use that heat in our district heating systems to make sure that it will be benefiting consumers and not wasted.

In this directive, we set a yearly energy savings obligation standing at 0.8听%, going towards 1.9听% each year. That means the Member States will have to do an effort to save 1.9听% of their energy consumption each year. It鈥檚 a huge effort that this requires, but we can make it happen and we need to make it happen.

We set out in this directive to have a 3听% renovation rate of public buildings, so 3听% of the public buildings need to be renovated to become nearly zero-emission buildings every year. We make sure that we prioritise the people who suffer from energy poverty and we strengthen the energy-efficiency-first principle, which means that when you do make an energy project, you have to make the analysis to see can this actually be solved by increasing energy efficiency instead of increasing energy consumption and building more energy.

We also say that municipalities with more than 45听000 people living in them have to make heating and cooling plans to analyse where can we have district heating, where do we need heat pumps and how can we make that as efficient as possible?

We set a whole lot of targets and a whole lot of effort is being required by this directive. This will not come easily. It will not be achieved with business as usual. But we know that we can make it happen and we need to make it happen for the climate and for our energy security. This directive will be good for the climate and bad for Mr. Putin. I would like to thank the groups in the European 合法博彩网站, in particular. Ms Weiss, Mr Danti and Ms Paulus, who negotiated and secured a broad majority. Let鈥檚 make it happen, let鈥檚 vote for the Energy Efficiency Directive and let鈥檚 do this.

听听Tiemo W枚lken, Verfasser der Stellungnahme des mitberatenden Ausschusses f眉r Umweltfragen, 枚ffentliche Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin! Sehr geehrte Frau Kommissarin, sch枚n, dass Sie heute hier sind! Ich spreche jetzt zu einem Teil dieser drei Berichte, 眉ber die wir heute reden, n盲mlich 眉ber den Bericht 眉ber nachhaltige Schiffskraftstoffe.

In der Tat waren es sehr intensive Verhandlungen, die wir gef眉hrt haben. Ich glaube, dass wir als Europ盲ische Union einen ersten Schritt in Richtung Dekarbonisierung des Schiffsverkehrs gehen. Wir sind als Parlament noch einmal deutlich ambitionierter, als es die Kommission war, als es der Rat war. Das ist gut, insbesondere, dass wir weltweit endlich ein Mandat f眉r E-Fuels haben. Ab 2031听鈥� das ist ein richtig guter Schritt und ein notwendiger Technologiewechsel, den wir hier bekommen haben. Auch die Landstromversorgung ist zentral, insbesondere dort, wo H盲fen auch in den St盲dten sind, weil damit auch f眉r bessere Luft gesorgt werden kann.

Damit jetzt zu den schlechten Nachrichten: Ich glaube, dass wir hinter den M枚glichkeiten zur眉ckgeblieben sind, gerade was die Landstromversorgung, aber auch die Ambition angeht, wirklich bis 2050 klimaneutrale Schifffahrt hinzubekommen. W盲hrend wir das aufgrund der konservativen Mehrheit hier jetzt nicht durchsetzen konnten, hat die Internationale Schifffahrtsorganisation gerade beschlossen, 2050 klimaneutral zu sein. Also haben wir hier einen ersten Schritt gemacht, aber wir sind noch lange nicht am Ziel, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen.

听听Rasmus Andresen, Verfasser der Stellungnahme des mitberatenden Ausschusses f眉r Industrie, Forschung und Energie. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin! Endlich gibt es Klimaziele f眉r die Schifffahrt. Das sind gute Nachrichten, denn der wachsende Sektor muss deutlich mehr tun, um die Klimaziele umzusetzen.

Die FuelEU-Maritime-Verordnung ist ein Einstieg, um die Schifffahrt gr眉ner zu machen. Das erste Mal formulieren wir verbindliche Ziele, um die Schifffahrt emissionsfrei zu machen, und wir schaffen verbindliche Ausbauziele f眉r erneuerbare Kraftstoffe. Das ist nicht nur gut f眉r das Klima, sondern gibt der Industrie auch Verbindlichkeit, um zu planen und zu investieren.

Das ist eine Riesenchance f眉r unsere maritime Industrie: Schiffe werden bald nicht mehr da gebaut, wo die Produktion am g眉nstigsten ist, sondern da, wo die innovativsten Antriebe entstehen. Die emissionsfreien Schiffe der Zukunft werden in Schweden, in Frankreich oder bei mir zu Hause in Norddeutschland gebaut. Gut bezahlte Industriejobs entstehen bei uns vor Ort.

Aber diese Verordnung kann nur ein Einstieg sein. Leider ist es zu vielen Lobbygruppen gelungen, Ausnahmen f眉r kleine Schiffe oder auch den F盲hrverkehr zu Inseln in das Gesetz hineinzuformulieren. Das Ziel von minus 80听% Treibhausgasaussto脽 bis 2050 reicht nicht aus. Wir brauchen 100听%! Daf眉r werden wir Gr眉ne weiter k盲mpfen.

听听Beno卯t Lutgen, rapporteur pour avis de la commission de l鈥檃griculture et du d茅veloppement rural. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Madame la Commissaire, chers coll猫gues, that鈥檚 enough, 莽a suffit. Non, l鈥檃griculture n鈥檈st pas industrielle en Europe. Elle est familiale, elle est locale. Elle se d茅veloppe avec des crit猫res sans cesse relev茅s sur les plans environnemental, sanitaire ou encore du bien-锚tre animal. L鈥檃griculture n鈥檃 rien 脿 faire dans cette directive sur les 茅missions industrielles. L鈥檃griculture n鈥檃 rien 脿 faire dans un texte qui concerne les incin茅rateurs ou encore la cimenterie.

L鈥檃griculture m茅rite tout notre soutien et ce texte va 脿 l鈥檈ncontre m锚me du bien-锚tre animal. Il va 脿 l鈥檈ncontre m锚me de la protection de l鈥檈nvironnement, par la concentration que cela entra卯nera demain d鈥檈xploitations agricoles encore plus grandes. Pourquoi? Parce que les co没ts qui sont demand茅s aux agriculteurs pour une purification qui est limit茅e seront 脿 nouveau insupportables pour le monde agricole. Et d鈥檃ucuns revendront leur exploitation agricole. Voil脿 les cons茅quences de ce texte pour l鈥檃griculture.

Je vous demande de soutenir pleinement l鈥檈nsemble des amendements qui ont 茅t茅 d茅fendus par la commission de l鈥檃griculture, pour 茅viter notamment que le secteur bovin ne soit demain couvert par cette directive.

听听Adina-Ioana V膬lean, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam听President, honourable Members of the 合法博彩网站, ladies and gentlemen, today鈥檚 debate and tomorrow鈥檚 vote shows that we are delivering on our Green Deal ambition.

Let me start with the two proposals on industrial emissions. I want to thank the rapporteur Mr听Kanev, the ENVI Chair Mr听Canfin and all the shadow rapporteurs for the work on this file. The Commission supports the ENVI report for many core elements of our proposal, notably ensuring more consistent emissions limits across the EU, promoting resource efficiency, facilitating public access to information, and making the legislation more forward鈥攍ooking with better links to innovation.

合法博彩网站 has been discussing the widening of the scope to cover more livestock farming activities. The Commission would like to stress that this widened scope would only concern the largest livestock farms. This would help relieve the pressure on the smallest farms in meeting the overall climate adjustment efforts required in the agricultural sector.

Turning to the two transport files, I welcome the compromise text on the new Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation and the FuelEU Maritime Regulation. On both files we have an ambitious and a balanced result. I would like to thank the rapporteur Mr听Warborn and the former rapporteur Mr听Ertug, as well as the shadow rapporteurs for their excellent work and the good cooperation with the Czech and Swedish presidencies and as well with the Commission.

The AFI Regulation will ensure a market鈥攄riven rollout of sufficient and user鈥攆riendly alternative fuels infrastructure everywhere in the EU. We also have for the first time mandatory deployment targets for key recharging and refuelling infrastructure, and these include electric recharging infrastructure for light and heavy鈥攄uty vehicles on the road, hydrogen refuelling infrastructure for road vehicles, onshore power supply in TEN鈥擳 ports in alignment with FuelEU Maritime, and electricity supply to stationary aircraft in all TEN鈥擳 airports. As you know, we would have appreciated higher targets for heavy鈥攄uty vehicle recharging and hydrogen refuelling infrastructure. But the end result is very good considering the starting position of the Member States.

The FuelEU Maritime Regulation will play a crucial role in decarbonising the maritime sector. Importantly, FuelEU Maritime remains an incentive and goal鈥攂ased regulation. It keeps the door open to new technologies and allows technology suppliers to develop solutions, meeting the needs of different shipping segments. It also recognises the role e鈥攆uels will play in the future and provides incentives to support their cost鈥攃ompetitiveness and uptake.

FuelEU Maritime also provides the inspiration for regulating shipping emissions globally. Following the milestone decision at the 80th meeting of the Marine Environment Protection Committee which concluded just last week, a global fuel standard modelled on our European approach should be adopted by 2025 as one of mid鈥攖erm measures to decarbonise shipping by mid鈥攃entury.

The Commission also welcomes the agreement reached on the proposal for the recast of the Energy Efficiency Directive. We convey our warmest thanks to the rapporteur Mr听Fuglsang and the shadow rapporteurs for their efforts in reaching this result. This is a major piece of the EU鈥檚 energy policy. By boosting energy efficiency, the EED recast provides the EU with a solid framework to reach our climate goals and to increase our energy independence. We welcome the agreement on an ambitious energy efficiency target of 11.7% covered by a strong governance mechanism and an annual energy savings obligation target of 1.49%, as well as the target for energy reduction in the public sector of 1.9%.

In conclusion, I would like to thank you again for the constructive work on these five proposals, all very relevant to implement the European Green Deal.

听听Alexandr Vondra, zpravodaj V媒boru pro 啪ivotn铆 prost艡ed铆, ve艡ejn茅 zdrav铆 a bezpe膷nost potravin. 鈥� Pan铆 p艡edsedaj铆c铆, j谩 jsem byl st铆nov媒 zpravodaj stanoviska k AFIR, 膷ili k alternativn铆 infrastruktu艡e, k alternativn铆mu nab铆jen铆, a 艡eknu k tomu n谩sleduj铆c铆: ti z听n谩s 鈥� a k t臎m j谩 se tak茅 po膷铆t谩m 鈥�, kte艡铆 si mysl铆, 啪e nen铆 moudr茅 zakazovat spalovac铆 motory, ale nechat to s n臎jak媒mi incentives trhu, tak ti se samoz艡ejm臎 a logicky klon铆 k tomu, 啪e daleko lep拧铆 by to bylo nechat tr啪n铆mu prost艡ed铆 a tomu, jak谩 je vlastn臎 popt谩vka, a ne jaksi socialisticky n臎co budovat podle r暖zn媒ch p臎tilet媒ch pl谩n暖, n臎co zakazovat, n臎co p艡ikazovat.

Realitou je ale tady, 啪e v tomto prost艡ed铆 a v t茅to ctihodn茅 instituci p艡ev谩啪il ten n谩zor socialistick媒, to znamen谩 zakazovat, p艡ikazovat. A kdy啪 tedy lidem chceme zakazovat ty spalovac铆 motory 鈥� a j谩 znovu 艡铆k谩m, j谩 s t铆m nesouhlas铆m 鈥�, tak jim samoz艡ejm臎 mus铆me nab铆dnout i n臎co, aby mohli jezdit a aby mohli nab铆jet.

膶ili z tohoto hlediska samoz艡ejm臎 ta legislativa AFIR m谩 sv暖j velk媒 v媒znam. Proto jsem se tak茅 煤膷astnil jej铆ho vyjedn谩n铆. I tady mus铆m konstatovat, 啪e to m谩 daleko do toho, abych nad t铆m v媒skal a nad拧en臎 s t铆m souhlasil. Takov谩 situace zde ur膷it臎 nen铆 prost臎 proto, 啪e my bychom, na拧e frakce, up艡ednost艌ovali daleko 拧ir拧铆 m铆ru technologick茅 neutrality. Zase tady preferujeme dominantn臎 elektromobilitu, 膷ili vlastn臎 vyd谩v谩me evropsk媒 pr暖mysl v拧anc tak, aby n谩s tady prost臎 p艡ev谩lcovala 膶铆na. To si mysl铆m, 啪e je obrovsk谩 chyba. Ale nen铆 sporu o tom, 啪e budou-li lid茅 jezdit elektromobily, mus铆 m铆t i kde nab铆jet, a pokud jim to zakazujeme a p艡ikazujeme, tak jim mus铆me nab铆zet i n臎jakou alternativu.

听听Bas Eickhout, rapporteur for the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. 鈥� Madam President, I am not sure my colleague was really speaking as ENVI rapporteur. I didn鈥檛 get that feeling.

I will speak here as ENVI rapporteur on the energy efficiency file. First, I really would like to thank the rapporteur and all the shadows for the great work on energy efficiency. I think it is very important. We are always talking about energy efficiency first, but still energy efficiency has been one of the three targets that has never been binding. So we have targets on emission reductions, on renewables, and then we had efficiency targets not being binding. And guess what? Those targets until 2020 were the most difficult to meet.

I think something has changed finally, both in the Commission as also with the Member States, now with the war in Ukraine. That energy that we are not using, we don鈥檛 need to import, we don鈥檛 need to replace it by expensive alternatives. We just don鈥檛 need the energy. We don鈥檛 need the wasting of this energy. That is now also being put forward, and I think that is a very great result.

Last point quickly on the Industrial Emission Directive will be the tightest vote. Please, colleagues, remember when we are talking about cattle and some targets, we are talking about the big farms. The ENVI compromise is encompassing 3听% of the farms but more than 20听% of the emissions. We are talking about big farms, industrial farms. And think of that when you vote.

听听Michael Bloss, Verfasser der Stellungnahme des mitberatenden Ausschusses f眉r Industrie, Forschung und Energie. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, sehr geehrte Damen und Herren! Unter den zehn meistverkauften E-Automodellen im Jahr 2022 ist gerade mal eins aus der Europ盲ischen Union. Der Rest kommt aus den USA und aus China. Leider haben die europ盲ischen Hersteller hier schon den Anschluss verpasst, und manche in diesem Haus h盲ngen immer noch an den E-Fuels und an den Verbrennermotoren und machen dadurch die Modernisierung der Wirtschaft noch schwieriger.

Dabei ist klar: Wer gute Jobs und Industrie erhalten will, der muss jetzt in die Modernisierung investieren. Das hei脽t: Nat眉rlich brauchen wir schnell viele Lades盲ulen f眉r E-Autos, f眉r E-Lkws. Das ist aber nicht alles. Mobilit盲t 盲ndert sich. Wir brauchen auch E-Busse, mehr Verkehr auf Schienen und Radwegen, und wir brauchen vor allen Dingen eines: eine breite Unterst眉tzung f眉r den Gr眉nen Deal und die 枚kologische Modernisierung der Wirtschaft. Mit Ihrem Kampf gegen den Gr眉nen Deal k盲mpfen Sie gegen die Modernisierung und bef枚rdern die Deindustrialisierung. Liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen, stehen Sie zum Gr眉nen Deal, schaffen Sie Sicherheit f眉r Jobs, f眉r die Industrie, f眉r Investitionen, daf眉r, dass Europa beim Rennen um die Weltmarktf眉hrerschaft nicht leer ausgeht!

听听Tom Berendsen, Rapporteur voor advies van de Commissie vervoer en toerisme. 鈥� Voorzitter, collega鈥檚, vanuit de Commissie vervoer hebben wij dit dossier met aandacht gevolgd.

Energie-effici毛ntie is een onderwerp dat eigenlijk veel te weinig aandacht krijgt 鈥� ook in de publieke discussie 鈥� want minder gebruiken is uiteindelijk essentieel.

We zijn allerlei grote strategie毛n in Europa aan het optuigen over hoe we minder afhankelijk kunnen worden, hoe we zelf meer energie kunnen gaan produceren, hoe we zelf meer grondstoffen kunnen gaan mijnen. Maar uiteindelijk komt alles op het volgende neer: als wij in staat zijn iets minder te gebruiken, effici毛nter te worden, dan betekent dit dat we allerlei andere zaken minder hoeven te doen.

Daarom complimenten voor de collega鈥檚 die hier al die tijd zeer intensief mee bezig zijn geweest. Ik hoop van harte dat we dit tot een goed einde kunnen brengen.

听听Niklas Nienass, rapporteur for the opinion of the Committee on Regional Development. 鈥� Madam President, it is necessary to ensure that no citizen, whether he lives at the city, village or in a remote territory, is left behind. Alternative fuel systems will only be effective when a specific person can move freely within the whole territory of the European Union and to be sure about to be able to use the alternative fuels infrastructure at any time of the whole trip. This means immediate action at the full鈥攆ledged action. The European regions be they small or big, be they rural or urban, or be they in the centre of Europe or in the outermost regions.

In order to achieve a well鈥攆unctioning network, we should look even wider than the European Union and include third countries into the cooperation, especially those candidates for the Union membership. It is not only the density of the network of alternative fuels, but is also important that the adaptation of the network is specific to the specific needs of the people. So it needs to be inclusive and accessible for all people, especially those with disabilities or reduced mobility.

Before approving investment, it is therefore necessary to ensure that these systems are being developed in order to meet the needs and capacities of all people, because only an inclusive system can ensure faster results towards climate neutrality.

听听Alice Kuhnke, 蹿枚谤别诲谤补驳补苍诲别 av yttrande fr氓n FEMM-utskottet. 鈥� Fru talman! 40听miljoner听m盲nniskor i EU lever i energifattigdom. Det 盲r kvinnor, det 盲r fattigpension盲rer, det 盲r ensamst氓ende f枚r盲ldrar som tvingas v盲lja mellan att betala elr盲kningarna eller ge sina barn mat. Situationen har f枚rv盲rrats efter Rysslands invasionskrig i Ukraina. De som fr盲mst drabbats av energikrisen, det 盲r de som redan innan hade f枚r mycket m氓nad kvar i slutet av l枚nen.

Men det finns en l枚sning lika enkel som effektiv, lika billig som r盲ttvis: energieffektivisering. Tack vare gruppen De gr枚na ligger ett betydligt tuffare f枚rslag p氓 bordet 盲n kommissionens ursprungsf枚rslag. Det svenska ordf枚randeskapet k盲mpade tyv盲rr f枚r att s盲nka ambitionen. Nu har vi chansen att se till att de inte lyckas.

听听Sara Skyttedal, 蹿枚谤别诲谤补驳补苍诲别 av yttrande fr氓n ITRE-utskottet. 鈥� Fru talman! Vi debatterar nu industriutsl盲ppsdirektivet. Att inkludera n枚tkreatur i ett direktiv om industriutsl盲pp 盲r i grunden ett felt盲nk. V氓ra kor 盲r inte n氓gra utsl盲ppsmaskiner och v氓ra b枚nders fastigheter 盲r inga fabriker. Vi borde inte heller behandla dem som om de vore det.

N枚tkreatur 盲r, med svenska landsbygdsministern Peter Kullgrens ord, 鈥漹andrande, levande beredskapslager鈥�. N盲r vi stiftar lagar p氓 nationell eller europeisk niv氓 b枚r vi g枚ra det med den h盲r utg氓ngspunkten. Det som f枚resl氓s h盲r 盲r ist盲llet att se p氓 kor som ett problem, som skulle beh枚va ytterligare regleringar. Det 盲r fel.

Europa beh枚ver fler b枚nder, inte f盲rre. Vi beh枚ver g枚ra det enklare och mer attraktivt, inte sv氓rare och mindre attraktivt, att bedriva jordbruk. Jag ber d盲rf枚r mina kollegor att st枚dja 盲ndringsf枚rslaget fr氓n AGRI-utskottet om att inte inkludera n枚tkreatur i direktivets best盲mmelser.

听听Jens Gieseke, im Namen der PPE-Fraktion. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, Frau Kommissarin V膬lean, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Das ist ein wichtiges Signal heute! Fehlende Ladeinfrastruktur ist immer noch ein gro脽es Problem. Ohne Akzeptanz bei den B眉rgerinnen und B眉rgern wird es keine Reduktion der Emissionen geben. Wir brauchen eine europaweite Erfolgsgeschichte und nicht ein paar Lades盲ulen in einigen wenigen L盲ndern. Die AFIR war hier ein gro脽er Erfolg, auch f眉r die EVP. Wo andere wieder ausschlie脽en wollten, haben wir auf Technologieoffenheit gesetzt, rechtlich bindende Ziele vereinbart, die Planungssicherheit geben. Das muss jetzt von den Mitgliedstaaten umgesetzt werden.

Die AFIR war da nur der Startschuss. Mehr Engagement ist notwendig, insbesondere aufgrund des Verbrennerverbots ab 2035, wobei wir da ja noch auf den Vorschlag von 痴颈锄别辫谤盲蝉颈诲别苍迟 Timmermans f眉r die Anerkennung klimaneutraler Kraftstoff warten. Nun ja, entweder kann er nicht oder will er nicht, in jedem Fall: Geliefert hat der Herr 痴颈锄别辫谤盲蝉颈诲别苍迟 bislang nichts.

Die Verbotspolitiker bleiben sich treu. Obwohl die Lkw-Ausbauziele in der AFIR abgeschw盲cht wurden听鈥� im Rat gab es schlicht keine Mehrheit f眉r mehr Ehrgeiz听鈥�, wollen Gr眉ne das Verbrenner-Verbot nun auch bei Lkw und Bussen. Ich finde, das ist nur noch weltfremd und realit盲tsfern. Wir brauchen alle L枚sungen: Elektro, Wasserstoff, LNG, nachhaltige Kraftstoffe. Wir sollten nichts ausschlie脽en. Am Ende haben wir bei dem technischen Dossier AFIR einen guten Kompromiss erzielt. Ich m枚chte allen Beteiligten danken, und erlauben Sie mir eine pers枚nliche Aussage: Der Kollege Ertug hat das Haus verlassen. Lieber Ismail, dir und deiner Familie alles Gute, und ich hoffe, wir sehen uns au脽erhalb des Parlaments wieder.

听听Mohammed Chahim, namens de S&D-Fractie. 鈥� Voorzitter, de richtlijn industri毛le emissies is hard nodig. Niet alleen om de natuur te beschermen, maar ook voor onze gezondheid.

Het is voor iedereen wel duidelijk dat vervuiling grote nadelige gevolgen heeft voor het milieu, maar ook voor onze gezondheid. De nadelen zijn groot. De giftige stoffen die vrijkomen in onze lucht, ons water, onze bodem vormen een directe bedreiging voor de natuur en de gezondheid van ons en onze dierbaren. Ze dragen bij aan luchtwegenaandoeningen en hart- en vaatziekten. Omwonenden van dit soort bedrijven hebben vaak meer kans op kanker en andere ziektes. En te vaak zijn het de meest kwetsbare gemeenschappen die in de buurt van vervuilende fabrieken wonen en lijden onder die nadelig effecten op de gezondheid, en dat is onacceptabel.

Daarnaast is de herziening van de richtlijn ook belangrijk voor een gelijk speelveld in Europa. Het kan niet zo zijn dat er in het ene land heel lage en strikte uitstootnormen zijn en dat in andere landen veel hogere limieten worden toegestaan. Dat cre毛ert een ongelijk speelveld voor onze industrie binnen Europa. Daar moet een eind aan komen.

Het is goed dat we deze richtlijn herzien, dat het recht op compensatie wordt verbeterd en dat hogere boetes kunnen worden opgelegd bij overtredingen, en dat we in heel Europa strengere eisen stellen aan emissies van zware industri毛le installaties. Het is belangrijk dat onze kinderen een gezonde toekomst tegemoet kunnen zien en zonder zorgen in open water kunnen zwemmen. We moeten winsten niet boven onze gezondheid, ons leven plaatsen.

Nog 茅茅n opmerking over landbouw, Voorzitter, want er wordt hier gedaan alsof een bepaalde partij de enige is die opkomt voor de landbouw. De grootste bedreiging voor de kleine en middelgrote familiebedrijven is juist de industrialisatie van de landbouw. We hebben het over minder dan 3听% van de veebedrijven die we onder deze richtlijn willen laten vallen. Juist bedrijven die door hun schaalvoordeel oneerlijk concurreren met die kleine en middelgrote familiebedrijven. En die boerenbedrijven, die hebben zeker een toekomst in Nederland, en in Europa.

听听Michal Wiezik, on behalf of the Renew Group. 鈥� Madam President, tomorrow we vote on the Industrial Emissions Directive. Despite tough negotiations, we agreed on a complex position with a solid von der Leyen majority. The report found a good balance between ensuring a high level of protection of the environment and human health and balancing the burden imposed on business.

We have strengthened the cross-border elements of the file and general management of water within industrial use. We significantly improve the aspects of environmental performance and emission limits and provided the public with easier access to justice in those cases where an IED permit was breached and caused human health harm. Please vote in favour of the report and against the amendments which weaken the report, including on environmental performance limit values.

The only main question that remains open is the inclusion of intensive, large scale cattle farming into the scope of the Directive. And I believe we will approve this important element as well. With the adoption of the ambitious Industrial Emissions Directive, we hold to our goals and priority towards the European Green Deal.

听听Jutta Paulus, im Namen der Verts/ALE-Fraktion. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, Frau Kommissarin, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Ich k枚nnte hier auch eine halbe Stunde reden, denn von den Gesetzen, die wir hier gerade besprechen, habe ich vier mitverhandelt.

Ich fange mal mit der Energieeffizienzrichtlinie an, die ist das ma脽gebliche Instrument, um endlich Schluss zu machen mit der Energieverschwendung, denn hier h盲ngen die Fr眉chte so niedrig, dass man sich nach ihnen b眉cken muss. Wir haben zwar viel erreicht, aber wenn man sich die Entwicklungen bei den Erneuerbaren, bei der Elektromobilit盲t, bei der Geb盲udew盲rme anschaut, dann muss man konstatieren, dass das Ziel, auf das man sich letztlich einigen konnte, ziemlich genau bei der H盲lfte von dem liegt, was potenziell m枚glich w盲re. Aber ich bin Optimistin, wir k枚nnen ja immer besser sein als die Richtlinie.

Zu den nachhaltigen Schiffstreibstoffen hat mein Kollege Rasmus Andresen schon das meiste gesagt. Auch hier: Die Investitionen, die geplanten Investitionen der gr枚脽ten europ盲ischen Reederei alleine reichen schon aus, um die E-Fuel-Quote zu erf眉llen. Damit ist, glaube ich, ziemlich viel gesagt zur Ambition dieses Gesetzes.

Die Industrieemissionsrichtlinie 鈥� wir haben es gerade von den Kollegen geh枚rt 鈥� steht auf der Kippe, und auch da听鈥� das ist eines der wirksamsten Instrumente zur Verringerung von Umweltverschmutzung und zum Schutz der Gesundheit von B眉rgerinnen und B眉rgern听鈥� wird das hier politisiert auf dem R眉cken von Mensch und Natur.

Wo stehen wir also beim Gr眉nen Deal? Wir sind beim Klima ganz gut vorangekommen. Aber der zweite zentrale Pfeiler, der Erhalt unserer Lebensgrundlagen, der droht hier gerade unterminiert zu werden. Wenn wir die Umweltverschmutzung nicht eind盲mmen, dann gehen unsere 脰kosysteme weiter zugrunde. Wenn wir nicht daf眉r sorgen, dass weniger Emissionen, insbesondere auch aus den gro脽en tierhaltenden Betrieben, in die Umwelt gelangen, schaffen wir auch unsere Klimaziele nicht. Die Verordnung 眉ber die Wiederherstellung der Natur, 眉ber die wir am Mittwoch abstimmen werden, f盲llt in die gleiche Kategorie. Alles, was nicht origin盲r Klima oder Energie ist, wird verhetzt, wird politisiert, es wird zum Gegenstand populistischer Angriffe gemacht und es wird den Leuten Sand in die Augen gestreut. Denn wenn wir so weitermachen wie bisher, ist das der sichere Weg, wie wir weder unsere Klimaziele noch unsere Biodiversit盲tsziele noch das Null-Schadstoff-Ziel erf眉llen k枚nnen, und damit ist der Gr眉ne Deal de facto kastriert.

Liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen, machen Sie das nicht mit! Unterst眉tzen Sie die Verordnung 眉ber die Wiederherstellung der Natur und auch die Industrieemissionsrichtlinie, denn es geht hier um mehr als um populistische Debatten und Wahlk盲mpfe!

听听Carlo Fidanza, a nome del gruppo ECR. 鈥� Signora Presidente, signora Vicepresidente, onorevoli colleghi, green, sostenibilit脿, decarbonizzazione sono il mantra che ha portato alla presentazione del pacchetto Fit for 55.

Anche in questa sessione voteremo una serie di provvedimenti che ne fanno parte e che risentono tutti dello stesso vizio di origine: ci stanno chiedendo di fare una costosissima rivoluzione industriale verde per contribuire di uno "zero virgola" alla riduzione delle emissioni globali, mentre i paesi pi霉 inquinanti si arricchiranno, vendendoci quello che serve alla nostra transizione, realizzato grazie a nuove centrali a carbone e magari grazie al lavoro minorile.

Le transizioni, la storia ce lo insegna, offrono opportunit脿 ma presentano il conto: intere filiere industriali che rischiano di saltare, lavoratori disoccupati, famiglie in difficolt脿. E chi paga questo conto? Le imprese, i cittadini o, nelle migliori delle ipotesi, gli Stati membri, che poi siamo sempre noi, ai quali non viene nemmeno concesso di scorporare quegli investimenti obbligatori dai parametri del debito.

Un'impostazione centralista, a tratti totalitaria, fondata su analisi di impatto discutibili, sulla costante violazione del principio di neutralit脿 tecnologica, sulla mancata fiducia nelle imprese 鈥� da sempre il miglior volano all'innovazione 鈥� sulla corsa sfrenata all'elettrico tutto e subito, che ci consegner脿 alla dipendenza dalla Cina proprio mentre ci liberiamo faticosamente da quella della Russia.

Non paghi di voler mettere in ginocchio l'automotive, i trasporti, la meccanica, la chimica, la farmaceutica e molti altri settori manifatturieri, il commissario Timmermans e il suo collettivo ultra-ambientalista, spalleggiati dalle sinistre verdi e rosse, provano a dare il colpo di grazia anche al settore agroalimentare. Lo fanno gi脿 da tempo, a dire il vero.

Oggi rilanciano con la legge sul ripristino della natura e provano il colpo di grazia con la direttiva sulle emissioni industriali, che vorrebbe di fatto equiparare gli allevamenti bovini alle fabbriche inquinanti, con esiti disastrosi per il settore, per la nostra stessa sicurezza alimentare e, in fondo, anche per l'ambiente perch茅 saremmo costretti a maggiori importazioni da paesi terzi molto meno sostenibili di noi.

Ma ormai il re 猫 nudo e non vi baster脿 la giovane Greta, qui tra qualche ora; tra un anno saranno i cittadini europei a presentarvi il conto.

听听Marie Dauchy, au nom du groupe ID. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, le texte dont il est question traite du d茅ploiement d鈥檜ne infrastructure pour carburants alternatifs, mais il aurait en v茅rit茅 pu s鈥檌ntituler 芦d茅ploiement d鈥檜ne infrastructure pour faire payer toujours plus les propri茅taires de voiture individuelle禄.

Car il faut que nous arr锚tions collectivement de nous mentir et, surtout, de mentir au peuple. Ce que la Commission europ茅enne, avec l鈥檃val de la gauche 茅cologiste, nous vante depuis maintenant plusieurs ann茅es, est une gabegie sans nom. La mobilit茅 tout 茅lectrique que vous imposez sans consentement finira d鈥檃chever l鈥檜ne des derni猫res industries europ茅ennes dominantes 脿 l鈥檌nternational, en aggravant la crise climatique et en cr茅ant les conditions d鈥檜n massacre social pour les peuples. Le d茅ploiement des bornes 茅lectriques 脿 marche forc茅e qui est pr茅vu dans ce contexte n鈥檈st qu鈥檜ne mani猫re d鈥檃cc茅l茅rer sa mise en place, au m茅pris du principe de neutralit茅 technologique qui voudrait que chaque 脡tat soit libre des technologies qu鈥檌l emploie pour d茅carboner les transports.

L鈥橴nion europ茅enne se transforme petit 脿 petit en Union sovi茅tique europ茅enne o霉 des technocrates non 茅lus et d茅connect茅s imposent des d茅cisions absurdes contre l鈥檌nt茅r锚t des peuples. Mais n鈥檕ubliez pas qu鈥檈n d茅mocratie, c鈥檈st le peuple qui d茅cide. Et dans quelques mois, vous risquez de r茅apprendre cette le莽on 脿 vos d茅pens.

听听Marisa Matias, em nome do Grupo The Left. 鈥� Senhora Presidente, a Lei das Emiss玫es Industriais 茅 uma das poucas que adota uma abordagem integrada da prote莽茫o ambiental como um todo, prevenindo a polui莽茫o na fonte atrav茅s do controlo mais rigoroso das emiss玫es, mais fiscaliza莽茫o e compensa莽茫o, acesso 脿 informa莽茫o e planos de transforma莽茫o das instala莽玫es industriais.

As negocia莽玫es foram dif铆ceis, sobretudo quanto 脿 inclus茫o da pecu谩ria. A proposta original abrange uma parte 铆nfima dos setores da produ莽茫o do gado, de su铆nos e de aves, mas, sem surpresa, mobilizou uma campanha agressiva do lobby da agricultura industrial.

A proposta que vamos votar 茅, por isso, mais fraca do que o deveria ser. Ainda assim, temos a obriga莽茫o de aprov谩-la.

Revis茫o de licen莽as, aumento de penaliza莽玫es, mais rigor na polui莽茫o da 谩gua e das incineradoras de res铆duos, inclus茫o da explora莽茫o e produ莽茫o de combust铆veis f贸sseis, descarboniza莽茫o, evitando a perda de biodiversidade e prevenindo acidentes de trabalho, prote莽茫o dos pequenos agricultores, s茫o alguns dos motivos.

Esperamos, por isso, que o agroneg贸cio e a direita n茫o destruam esta proposta no voto de amanh茫.

听听Pernille Weiss (PPE). 鈥� Fru Formand! De seneste uger har venstrefl酶jen tudet os 酶rene og de sociale medier fulde af p氓stande om, at biodiversiteten st氓r med det ene ben i graven, hvis ikke naturgenopretningsloven stemmes igennem. Vi, der er borgerlige og vil b忙redygtige l酶sninger, har h酶rt p氓 meget vr酶vl. Vr酶vl, der sammen med populisme, spin og personangreb, faktisk godt kan g氓 hen og 酶del忙gge vores demokratiske biodiversitet. Vi skal alts氓 blive bedre til at samtale og arbejde p氓 tv忙rs her i parlamentet. Et godt eksempel p氓, at vi faktisk kan det, er opdatering af direktivet om energieffektivisering. Energieffektivisering er jo den mest omkostningseffektive og hurtige metode til at reducere udledningerne af CO2 p氓, hvilket er til direkte gavn for biodiversiteten. Jeg forhandlede p氓 vegne af EPP et direktiv med h酶je ambitioner og en meget stor v忙rkt酶jskasse til at f酶re dem ud i livet i hvert eneste EU-land. Jeg er alts氓 ogs氓 ret stolt over, at jeg som den eneste dansker i EPP lykkedes med at f氓 min gruppe med p氓, at energieffektiviseringer fremover bliver bindende for alle EU's medlemslande, s氓 vi ved, hvor meget hvert land bidrager med frem mod m氓let om klimaneutralitet inden 2050. For os borgerlige er b忙redygtighed afg酶rende, og det 酶del忙gger alts氓 ikke biodiversiteten. Tv忙rtimod s氓 sikres det, at vi f氓r de mest effektive l酶sninger vedtaget.

听听Vera Tax (S&D). 鈥� Madam听President, dear Commissioner听V膬lean, it鈥檚 a hot and historic day in Strasbourg today. Historic because the EU countries are the first in the world to take action in decarbonising shipping. We will decrease the greenhouse gas intensity of fuels used by the ships, by every single ship that calls in the ports of Europe. And you know what? The European shipping industry is very much in favour of this legislation. It gives them a clear pathway for their investments in green ships and in green fuels. Or, to quote a clean fuel producer, 鈥榳e have never seen such a clear and economic positive incentive for the uptake of fuels in a long time鈥�.

And you know what else? Our citizens are really happy with this legislation. Container and cruise vessels whom at the moment are responsible for heavy air pollution in our ports like Rotterdam or Hamburg, they will be obliged to use electricity in the port, so no more air pollution in our ports in Europe.

So, you would think I am a happy Member of the European 合法博彩网站, of the Transport Committee. That is not the case. Because just a few days ago, I was in London at the International Maritime Organization meeting on the same subject and where the EU transformed the shipping sector to a speedboat in line and path with 1.5 degree warming, the IMO failed to do so. They improved just a little bit. But on a global scale there is still no real action plan to be in line with the Paris Agreement. The IMO is too slow for what this planet needs. This is a big disappointment, but if you are disappointed, get going, work harder and try to convince other and more people to join you.

So, I have my hopes up for the USA that they will introduce action legislations like we did and will join to be a front runner in transitioning to zero emission shipping, creating new jobs in Europe and in the States, and unlocking new opportunities for developing nations who have the sun and the wind to produce zero emission fuels.

听听Anna Deparnay-Grunenberg (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Wenn vom Verbrenner-Aus die Rede ist, denken ja fast alle immer direkt ans Auto. Tats盲chlich ist in den letzten Monaten noch ein anderer wichtiger Schritt Richtung Dekarbonisierung des Verkehrs gelungen. Mit der AFIR, der Verordnung 眉ber die Infrastruktur f眉r alternative Kraftstoffe, bringen wir auch die Elektrifizierung des G眉terverkehrs endlich voran. K眉nftig wird es alle 60听Kilometer eine Ladestelle f眉r Lkws geben. Damit schaffen wir die Voraussetzung, dass die Logistikbranche rasch auf batteriebetriebene oder alternative Kraftstoffe bei Lkws umsteigen kann. Laut Prognosen k枚nnte schon 2030 mehr als die H盲lfte der in Deutschland zugelassenen Lkws klimaneutral sein.

Damit nicht genug. Die Bahn wird ja oft beim Thema G眉terverkehr und Dekarbonisierung des Transports einfach vergessen. Wir Gr眉nen haben daf眉r gesorgt, dass auch der gesamte Bereich Schiene klimafit wird. Denn bisher sind auf der Schiene nur 54听% der Strecken in der EU elektrifiziert, und vor allem im Schieneng眉terverkehr dieseln noch viel zu viele Z眉ge durch die Gegend.

Es ist ein echter Durchbruch, meine Damen und Herren, dass die Mitgliedstaaten bis 2026 Ma脽nahmen zum Ausbau alternativer Antriebe der Schiene erbringen m眉ssen. Denn wir brauchen ja in einer klimaneutralen Welt irgendwann mal auch das Verbrenner-Aus f眉r die Dieselloks.

听听Grzegorz Tobiszowski (ECR). 鈥� Pani Przewodnicz膮ca! Szanowni Pa艅stwo! Nale偶y doceni膰 i podkre艣li膰, 偶e w dyrektywie w sprawie efektywno艣ci energetycznej, je艣li chodzi o postanowienie dotycz膮ce system贸w ciep艂owniczych, przepisy te wywr膮 bardzo du偶y pozytywny wp艂yw na modernizacj臋 istniej膮cych system贸w w nadchodz膮cych dekadach, co pozostaje kluczowe w zapewnieniu przyst臋pnego cenowo ciep艂a w domach, u ko艅cowych odbiorc贸w. Ale nie zmienia to jednak faktu, 偶e wysoko niepokoj膮ce pozostaj膮 nowe cele efektywno艣ci energetycznej, np. w art. 4 unijny cel redukcji zu偶ycia energii do 2030 r. do 11,7 %, a w art. 8 zapewnienie rocznych oszcz臋dno艣ci ko艅cowego zu偶ycia energii przez pa艅stwa cz艂onkowskie w latach 2024鈥�2030 o 艣rednio 1,49 %.

To s膮 tak du偶e cele i ambicje, kt贸re sprawiaj膮, 偶e niekt贸re kraje zg艂asza艂y, 偶e nie b臋d膮 w stanie zrealizowa膰 tych za艂o偶e艅. I pojawia si臋 pytanie 鈥� w sytuacji tak trudnej, kryzysowej, ekonomicznej i geopolitycznej Europy w relacji do innych kraj贸w, do innych kontynent贸w, w sytuacji, kiedy zak艂adamy cele i nie b臋dziemy ich w stanie osi膮gn膮膰, tracimy wiarygodno艣膰 jako kontynent wobec innych kontynent贸w i kraj贸w, jak Chiny, jak Stany Zjednoczone, a tak偶e tracimy w bardzo du偶ej mierze wiarygodno艣膰 u naszych obywateli i przedsi臋biorc贸w. Bowiem zak艂adane limity nie zostan膮 zrealizowane. I to nam zg艂asza艂y poszczeg贸lne kraje i poszczeg贸lne 艣rodowiska.

听听Anders Vistisen (ID). 鈥� Fru Formand! Det er, som om man her i huset tror, at n氓r man vil redde planeten, redde den gr酶nne omstilling, redde klimaet, s氓 handler det om, at politikere skal sidde i et rum og finde de vise sten. Det handler om, at man her, med de s忙rinteresser der er, skal "pick the winner", skal friholde de industrier, man selv er n忙r ved, eller som har en national interesse, og komme op med et stort bureaukratisk monster af et lovgivningskompleks, som i virkelighedens verden kun kommer til at forsinke og fordyre den gr酶nne omstilling. Det er nemlig ikke det, at vi skal tilbage til stenalderen i forhold til vores forbrug, eller at vi tror p氓, at vi i Europa kan l酶se klimaudfordringerne alene, der kommer til at redde kloden. Det, der kommer til at redde kloden, er, hvis vi form氓r at skabe den innovationskraft, form氓r at skabe en teknologineutral lyst til innovation i det frie marked. Det er s氓dan, menneskeheden har l酶ftet sig igen og igen 鈥� ikke gennem bureaukrati, ikke igennem parlamentarisk regulering og overregulering, men gennem det frie initiativ p氓 en fornuftbaseret teknologineutral regulering. Det er det, Europa og verden har brug for, og det er det, vi ikke leverer her i huset.

听听螆位蔚谓伪 螝慰蠀谓蟿慰蠀蟻维 (The Left). 鈥� 螝蠀蟻委伪 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 胃伪 萎胃蔚位伪 谓伪 蔚蠀蠂伪蟻喂蟽蟿萎蟽蠅 蟿慰谓 蔚喂蟽畏纬畏蟿萎 魏伪喂 蟿慰蠀蟼 蟽魏喂蠋未蔚喂蟼 蔚喂蟽畏纬畏蟿苇蟼, 渭蔚 蟿慰蠀蟼 慰蟺慰委慰蠀蟼 蔚蟻纬伪蟽蟿萎魏伪渭蔚 蔚谓蟿伪蟿喂魏维 蟿慰蠀蟼 蟿蔚位蔚蠀蟿伪委慰蠀蟼 渭萎谓蔚蟼 蟽蟿慰谓 魏伪谓慰谓喂蟽渭蠈 纬喂伪 蟿伪 蔚谓伪位位伪魏蟿喂魏维 魏伪蠉蟽喂渭伪. 螔蔚位蟿喂蠋蟽伪渭蔚 蟽畏渭伪谓蟿喂魏维 蟿畏谓 伪蟻蠂喂魏萎 蟺蟻蠈蟿伪蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 螘蟺喂蟿蟻慰蟺萎蟼 魏伪喂 蟺蔚蟿蠉蠂伪渭蔚 谓伪 胃苇蟽慰蠀渭蔚 蠁喂位蠈未慰尉慰蠀蟼 伪位位维 伪蟺蠈位蠀蟿伪 蟻蔚伪位喂蟽蟿喂魏慰蠉蟼 蟽蟿蠈蠂慰蠀蟼 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 伪谓维蟺蟿蠀尉畏 蠀蟺慰未慰渭蠋谓, 蔚谓伪位位伪魏蟿喂魏蠋谓 魏伪蠀蟽委渭蠅谓 魏伪喂 魏蠀蟻委蠅蟼 蟿畏蟼 畏位蔚魏蟿蟻喂魏萎蟼 蔚谓苇蟻纬蔚喂伪蟼 蟽蟿慰 慰未喂魏蠈 未委魏蟿蠀慰, 蟽蟿伪 位喂渭维谓喂伪 伪位位维 魏伪喂 蟿伪 伪蔚蟻慰未蟻蠈渭喂伪 蟿畏蟼 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏蟼.

螘蟺委蟽畏蟼, 未畏渭喂慰蠀蟻纬萎蟽伪渭蔚 蟿伪 蔚蟻纬伪位蔚委伪 蠋蟽蟿蔚 蟿伪 魏蟻维蟿畏 谓伪 蔚尉伪蟽蠁伪位委蟽慰蠀谓 蟿畏谓 伪蟺伪蟻伪委蟿畏蟿畏 未喂伪蠁维谓蔚喂伪 蟽蟿喂蟼 蟿喂渭苇蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 蟺蟻慰蟽蟿伪蟽委伪 蟿蠅谓 未喂魏伪喂蠅渭维蟿蠅谓 蟿蠅谓 魏伪蟿伪谓伪位蠅蟿蠋谓, 蟺慰蠀 蔚委谓伪喂 魏蟻委蟽喂渭慰喂 蟺伪蟻维纬慰谓蟿蔚蟼 魏伪蟿维 蟿畏 渭蔚蟿维尾伪蟽畏 蟽蟿畏 谓苇伪 伪蠀蟿萎 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿喂魏蠈蟿畏蟿伪 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 伪蟺慰蠁蠀纬萎 伪喂蟽蠂蟻慰魏苇蟻未蔚喂伪蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 蔚渭蟺喂蟽蟿慰蟽蠉谓畏 蟿蠅谓 蟺慰位喂蟿蠋谓 蟽蟿畏谓 畏位蔚魏蟿蟻慰魏委谓畏蟽畏. 螘委谓伪喂 蟺位苇慰谓 蔚蠀胃蠉谓畏 蟿蠅谓 魏蟻伪蟿蠋谓 谓伪 蔚蠁伪蟻渭蠈蟽慰蠀谓 蟿慰谓 魏伪谓慰谓喂蟽渭蠈 魏伪喂 谓伪 蔚尉伪蟽蠁伪位委蟽慰蠀谓 蠈蟿喂 畏 渭蔚蟿维尾伪蟽畏 胃伪 蔚委谓伪喂 未委魏伪喂畏 纬喂伪 蠈位慰蠀蟼. 螣喂 蟺慰位委蟿蔚蟼 伪位位维 魏伪喂 慰喂 蔚蟺伪纬纬蔚位渭伪蟿委蔚蟼 蟽蟿喂蟼 渭蔚蟿伪蠁慰蟻苇蟼 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 蟽蠀谓蔚蠂委蟽慰蠀谓 谓伪 魏喂谓慰蠉谓蟿伪喂 伪蟺蟻蠈蟽魏慰蟺蟿伪 魏伪喂 渭蔚 蟺蟻慰蟽喂蟿蠈 魏蠈蟽蟿慰蟼. 螤蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 未慰胃蔚委 蔚蟺伪蟻魏萎蟼 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 魏伪喂 蔚胃谓喂魏萎 蠂蟻畏渭伪蟿慰未蠈蟿畏蟽畏 纬喂伪 蟿喂蟼 蠀蟺慰未慰渭苇蟼 魏伪喂 纬喂伪 谓伪 魏伪位蠉蟺蟿慰谓蟿伪喂 慰喂 伪谓维纬魏蔚蟼 渭蔚蟿伪魏委谓畏蟽畏蟼 蠈位蠅谓 蠂蠅蟻委蟼 伪蟺慰魏位蔚喂蟽渭慰蠉蟼.

听听Miroslav Rada膷ovsk媒 (NI). 鈥� V谩啪en谩 pani predsedaj煤ca, jednozna膷ne budem hlasova钮 proti smernici o priemyseln媒ch emisi谩ch. Som europoslanec zo Slovenska a re拧pektujem odborn茅 stanovisko Slovenskej po木nohospod谩rskej a potravin谩rskej komory. Zni啪ovanie emisi铆 sklen铆kov媒ch plynov kysli膷n铆ka uhli膷it茅ho, met谩nu tak, 啪e zn铆啪ime chov hov盲dzieho dobytka na Slovensku zo s煤膷asn媒ch 600 dobyt膷铆ch jednotiek na 150 je pre slovensk媒ch po木nohospod谩rov a potravin谩rov jednoducho neprijate木n茅.

Zn铆啪i钮 emisie sklen铆kov媒ch plynov je mo啪no aj in媒m sp么sobom. Je potrebn茅 stara钮 sa o听prirodzen茅 pohlcova膷e emisi铆, lesy, vodu, vzduch, a o tieto lesy, vodu a vzduch, ktor媒ch je na Slovensku dostatok, by sa mali stara钮 predov拧etk媒m t铆, 膷o v t媒chto lesoch hospod谩ria: lesn铆ci, ne拧t谩tni vlastn铆ci. A ekologick铆 aktivisti, pr铆padne mimovl谩dne organiz谩cie niekedy nesk煤senos钮ou a neodbornos钮ou narobia viac 拧kody ako osohu, hoci ch谩pem, 啪e听aj ekologick铆 aktivisti aj mimovl谩dne organiz谩cie maj煤 膷o do 膷istoty ovzdu拧ia poveda钮.

听听Peter Liese (PPE). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Die ersten Sekunden meiner kurzen Redezeit m枚chte ich nutzen, um beim Thema Energieeffizienz denjenigen wie Niels Fuglsang und Pernille Weiss zu danken, die einen guten Kompromiss ausgearbeitet haben. Ich glaube, und wir als EVP glauben, mit national verbindlichen Zielen w盲re es noch besser gewesen, aber da hat uns leider der Rat gestoppt. Ich bitte auch alle Journalisten, dar眉ber mal zu schreiben, dass wir hier gemeinsam ambitioniert sind und der Rat uns da gebremst hat.

Zum Thema Industrieremissionen: Danke an den Berichterstatter Radan Kanev; er hat einen Text der Kommission, der schlecht war, deutlich verbessert. Meine Bitte an die Kolleginnen und Kollegen w盲re morgen bei der Abstimmung: Bitte Unterst眉tzung f眉r die Antr盲ge des Agrarausschusses. Rinderhaltung ist nicht industriell. Ich kenne das jedenfalls nicht aus meiner Region, und ich glaube, auch anderswo in Europa haben Rinder Frischluft, und wir sollten sie nicht einsperren. Und bitte die Antr盲ge von Dennis Radtke, die er ja mit vielen Kollegen aus vielen verschiedenen Fraktionen eingereicht hat, zum Thema Dekarbonisierung unterst眉tzen. Viele Unternehmen, unter anderem das gr枚脽te Stahlwerk Europas, das ich letzte Woche besichtigt habe, machen sich auf den Weg zur Klimaneutralit盲t. Darauf sollten wir uns konzentrieren. Das ist das Ziel dieser 脛nderungsantr盲ge von Radtke und Co. Ich bitte um Unterst眉tzung f眉r diese 脛nderungsantr盲ge!

听听Alex Agius Saliba (S&D). 鈥� L-ewwelnett nixtieq nifra魔 lir-rapporteur u anke l-kollegi tieg魔i g魔all-魔idma li g魔amilna fuq dan ir-rapport importanti li g魔andu l-g魔an illi jiggwida lill-industriji Ewropej biex jil魔qu l-ambizzjoni tat-tni摹摹is 偶ero sal-2050.

Nemmen li d-Direttiva dwar l-Emissjonijiet Industrijali kienet u hija kru膵jali biex jitnaqqsu t-tni摹摹is u l-emissjonijiet mis-setturi industrijali u 摹摹ib benefi膵膵ji ambjentali, klimati膵i u g魔as-sa魔魔a tal-Unjoni Ewropea.

B魔ala shadow rapporteur fil-Kumitat ITRE dwar ir-revi偶joni tad-Direttiva dwar l-Emissjonijiet, nilqa鈥� b鈥檓od partikolari l-introduzzjoni ta鈥� kapitolu 摹did dwar il-promozzjoni tal-innovazzjoni li jipprevedi b鈥檓od partikolari l-魔olqien ta鈥� 膵entru ta鈥� innovazzjoni g魔at-trasformazzjoni industrijali u l-emissjonijiet operat mill-Kummissjoni, li ji摹bor u janalizza informazzjoni dwar tekniki innovattivi.

Dan ir-rapport jindirizza l-aktar kwistjonijiet importanti ta鈥� din ir-revi偶joni, illi fl-a魔魔ar mill-a魔魔ar isibu bilan膵 importanti bejn il-魔arsien tal-ambjent u s-sa魔魔a tal-bniedem, imma fl-istess 魔in jaraw illi ma npo摹摹ux pi偶 sproporzjonat fuq l-industriji Ewropej illi fl-a魔魔ar mill-a魔魔ar ma jkunux jifil魔u g魔alihom.

(Il-kelliem a膵膵etta li jwie摹eb mistoqsija "karta blu")

听听Bogdan Rzo艅ca (ECR), pytanie zadane przez podniesienie niebieskiej kartki. 鈥揓a mam do Pana pytanie. Dlatego, 偶e 23 czerwca tego roku Greta Thunberg skre艣li艂a sw贸j wpis sprzed pi臋ciu lat, 偶e dwudziestego trzeciego czerwca tego roku b臋dzie zag艂ada ludzko艣ci. Ona wykre艣li艂a ten sw贸j wpis. Czy nie zastanawia si臋 Pan nad tym wszystkim, co si臋 m贸wi o tym pakiecie klimatycznym, tak偶e w 艣wietle tego, 偶e mamy ju偶 informacje z Komisji Bud偶etowej, 偶e na przysz艂y rok, 2024, rok wyborczy, planuje si臋 艣ci臋cie o 50% wydatk贸w na p艂atno艣ci? W styczniu tego roku 100% pa艅stw Unii Europejskiej prosi艂o o pe艂ne dop艂aty do p艂atno艣ci. Komisja je 艣cina. Sk膮d pieni膮dze? To jest moje pytanie: sk膮d Pan we藕mie pieni膮dze na te cele, o kt贸rych si臋 tu dzisiaj m贸wi?

听听Alex Agius Saliba (S&D), twe摹iba karta blu. 鈥� Jiena nemmen illi, anke kif di摹脿 g魔idt, il-bilan膵 li ntla魔aq kemm fil-Kumitat ITRE, kemm fil-Kumitat ENVI, kemm fil-Kumitati kollha, illi fl-a魔魔ar mill-a魔魔ar kellhom opinjoni fuq din il-le摹i偶lazzjoni li hija tant, u tant importanti sabiex fl-a魔魔ar mill-a魔魔ar insibu dan il-bilan膵, dan il-bilan膵 na魔seb u nemmen illi, fuq na魔a, qeg魔din naraw illi nsa魔魔u l-protezzjoni ambjentali, is-sostenibilit脿 li hija tant u tant importanti. U ma jag魔mel l-ebda sens illi nibqg魔u ng魔idu illi din il-problema ma te偶istix imma fl-a魔魔ar mill-a魔魔ar ukoll l-importanza illi t-targets illi qeg魔din inpo摹摹u quddiemna ma jo魔olqux pi偶 sproporzjonat fuq l-industriji Ewropej illi fl-a魔魔ar mill-a魔魔ar irridu naraw illi xorta wa魔da jibqg魔u kompetittivi. Nemmen illi dan il-bilan膵 intla魔aq, u ntla魔aq b鈥檓od tajjeb 魔afna.

听听Elsi Katainen (Renew). 鈥� Arvoisa puhemies, arvoisa komissaari, hyv盲t kollegat, huomenna 盲盲nest盲mme historiallisesta FuelEU Maritime -meriliikenneasetuksesta, joka tulee todella vahvasti vauhdittamaan EU:n meriliikennesektorin p盲盲st枚v盲hennyksi盲. Haluan kiitt盲盲 esittelij盲 Warbornia ja muita kanssaneuvottelijoita hyv盲st盲 yhteisty枚st盲. Olen eritt盲in tyytyv盲inen neuvottelemaamme tasapainoiseen lopputulokseen, joka asettaa kunnianhimoiset p盲盲st枚v盲hennystavoitteet ja tukee kest盲vien polttoaineiden ja my枚s tuulimekaniikan k盲ytt枚盲.

Samalla turvaamme EU:n kilpailukyky盲 ja varmistamme toimivat sis盲markkinat tarkoituksenmukaisilla joustoilla ja kompensaatioilla. Esimerkiksi talvimerenkulun huomioonotto lains盲盲d盲nn枚ss盲 on elint盲rke盲盲 sis盲markkinoiden tasapuolisuudelle. EU on kest盲v盲n merenkulun globaali suunnann盲ytt盲j盲 ja uskon, ett盲 FuelEU Maritime tulee kiritt盲m盲盲n my枚skin kansainv盲lisi盲 neuvotteluja.

听听Johan Nissinen (ECR). 鈥� Fru talman! M盲nniskan har i alla tider oroat sig f枚r fattigdom. Allra v盲rst 盲r det n盲r politiska beslut orsakar det. Vi som politiker b枚r d盲rf枚r g枚ra vad vi kan f枚r att inte uts盲tta m盲nniskor f枚r att hamna i fattigdom. Det m氓ste man tyv盲rr p氓minna Europaparlamentet om, detta rymdskepp som 盲r l氓ngt ifr氓n vanliga m盲nniskors vardag.

EU-tj盲nstem盲n och politiker 盲r v盲l omh盲ndertagna av skattebetalarnas h氓rda arbete och beh枚ver inte oroa sig f枚r konsekvenserna av den f枚rda politiken. Samtidigt som det r氓der inflation forts盲tter en majoritet i parlamentet att driva igenom det gigantiska och aggressiva klimatpaketet Green Deal. Det best氓r av f枚rbud, regleringar, energios盲kerhet, absurda renoveringstv氓ng och teknikfientlighet. Vi vet inte ens om det 枚ver huvud taget kommer att hj盲lpa klimatet med de h盲r 氓tg盲rderna. Men en sak vet vi: v氓ra medborgare kommer att bli fattigare.

听听Danilo Oscar Lancini (ID). 鈥� Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, non 猫 facile comprendere come parte di questo Parlamento sostenga che le emissioni degli allevamenti possano essere assimilate alle emissioni industriali.

Colleghi di diversi gruppi parlamentari e la stessa commissione AGRI hanno ripetutamente chiesto di trattare industria e agricoltura in modo diverso; non 猫 una questione politica, ma di realt脿.

Non possiamo lasciare che sia l'ideologia a imporre ai nostri contadini ed allevatori scelte che li penalizzano, invece di sostenerli come abbiamo sempre fatto. Credete veramente che includere il bestiame nelle emissioni industriali aiuti gli allevatori, la nostra agricoltura? E infine, che porti benefici alle nostre filiere produttive?

Per la Lega non 猫 cos矛, noi giochiamo a carte scoperte e con il voto di domani vedremo chi bara. Vedremo chi vuole veramente sostenere l'agricoltura europea e chi invece, per ideologia o chiss脿 cos'altro, la sta colpendo in modo inaccettabile.

Concludo dicendo che votare a favore dell'agricoltura non 猫 un voto contro l'ambiente, anzi valorizza generazioni di identit脿 e culture tramandate di padre in figlio in molte regioni europee.

Io non credo che si possa pensare di dare ai nostri figli domani, dopo aver sacrificato il mondo dell'allevamento, la farina di grillo o le cavallette.

听听Sandra Pereira (The Left). 鈥� Senhora Presidente, acompanhamos o potencial na renova莽茫o e na inova莽茫o de redes de energia, parque edificado, transportes e demais servi莽os de utilidade p煤blica, com vista a uma maior efici锚ncia energ茅tica, mas preocupa鈥攏os que as pol铆ticas energ茅ticas, designadamente as relativas 脿 efici锚ncia energ茅tica, possam contribuir para uma maior exclus茫o social e o agravamento das condi莽玫es de vida dos cidad茫os, com o aumento dos custos da habita莽茫o, da mobilidade ou dos pre莽os da energia. Mais ainda, num momento em que o aumento do custo de vida, nomeadamente da habita莽茫o, est谩 a sufocar as fam铆lias.

A defini莽茫o de metas vinculativas, dissemo-lo desde o in铆cio, exigir谩 a uns Estados mais esfor莽os do que a outros. Propusemos que os fundos mobilizados para promover a efici锚ncia energ茅tica fossem exclu铆dos do c谩lculo da d铆vida p煤blica e dos d茅fices or莽amentais dos Estados-Membros para que pudessem fazer os investimentos necess谩rios, proposta que foi rejeitada.

Defendemos que a recupera莽茫o do controlo p煤blico do setor energ茅tico 茅 fundamental para garantir os direitos econ贸micos, sociais e ambientais dos povos.

听听Christian Ehler (PPE). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, meine Damen und Herren! Die Industrieemissionsrichtlinie, wie sie vor der Revision bestand, trug erfolgreich zur Reduzierung von Emissionen in Europa bei. Im Grunde genommen ist sie auch ein modernes Instrument, denn sie hat einen Mechanismus, wo Industrie, NGOs, die 枚ffentliche Hand 眉ber Jahre diskutieren, wie man technologischen Fortschritt erreichen kann.

Aber wir sind in diesem Fall vollkommen 眉ber den Rahmen hinausgeschossen. Das wird ein Beitrag zur Deindustrialisierung Europas sein. Es ist superb眉rokratisch, es sind riesige Auflagen f眉r die Industrie, es wird kein Gramm Schadstoff reduziert werden. Es ist ein riesiges Beauflagungs鈥�, Kontroll鈥� und Dokumentationssystem f眉r eine Industrie, die wir ohnehin mit Dokumentationspflichten, mit b眉rokratischem Aufwand schwer belastet haben.

Insofern m眉ssen wir uns ganz genau 眉berlegen, was wir wollen. Es gibt im Deutschen ein Sprichwort, das hei脽t: Viele Hunde sind des Hasen Tod. Ich glaube, es geht nicht darum, die Frage zu stellen, Emissionen in der Industrie zu reduzieren, sondern es geht um die Art und Weise. Es ist 眉berbordend, es ist 眉berb眉rokratisch, es geht haupts盲chlich um Dokumentationen, und das wird der Industrie in Europa wie auch dem Klima nicht helfen.

听听Thomas Rudner (S&D). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Mit dem AFIR-Bericht haben wir als EU-Parlament einen gro脽en Erfolg in Sachen Klimaschutz erzielt. Die Bestimmungen 眉ber die Ladeinfrastruktur f眉r Pkw wurden erheblich verbessert, um einen schnelleren Aufbau von Lades盲ulen zu erm枚glichen. Wir haben einen schrittweisen Ansatz f眉r die Ladeinfrastruktur f眉r Lkw durchgesetzt, mit strengeren Zielen und einer Steigerung der Ladekapazit盲t im Laufe der Zeit. Auch Wasserstofftankstellen sollen z眉gig gebaut werden.

Die Kommission wird zeitnah pr眉fen, ob diese Ziele nochmals versch盲rft werden sollen. Kartenzahlung soll an allen Schnelllades盲ulen und Wasserstofftankstellen Pflicht werden 鈥� ein gro脽er Erfolg f眉r den europ盲ischen Verbraucherschutz. Zudem soll an diesen S盲ulen der Preis verbindlich Euro pro Kilowatt sein. Somit kann eine einheitliche Transparenz f眉r alle gew盲hrleistet werden.

Ein weiterer gro脽er Schritt ist die Schaffung des EU Access Points zur einheitlichen Datensammlung. Fahrerinnen und Fahrer werden in Zukunft viel leichter europaweit sehen k枚nnen, wann, wo und zu welchem genauen Preis sie laden bzw. tanken k枚nnen.

Insgesamt ist die Einigung ausgewogen und enth盲lt zahlreiche Gewinne f眉r das Europ盲ische Parlament. Der Vorschlag der Kommission konnte in mehreren Aspekten verbessert werden. Liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen, ich bitte Sie, dieses Dossier bei der Abstimmung zu unterst眉tzen.

听听Nicola Danti (Renew). 鈥� Signora Presidente, signora Commissaria, onorevoli colleghi, parlare di transizione verde significa saper coniugare ambizione e concretezza, senza cedimenti a ideologie o manifesti politici.

In alcuni casi non ci siamo riusciti e penso alla legge sul ripristino della natura e al voto di mercoled矛; in altri, invece, abbiamo capito che gestire la transizione significa scegliere obiettivi sfidanti ma realizzabili.

脠 questo il caso della direttiva sull'efficienza energetica, che fissa un target vincolante di riduzione del consumo energetico dell'11,7听% al 2030, nonch茅 obiettivi di risparmio energetico per ciascun Stato membro. Una legislazione fondamentale che rende realizzabili l'adagio per cui l'energia migliore, quella pi霉 pulita, 猫 quella che non consumiamo, che non vuol dire decrescita infelice o stop alla produzione industriale, ma investimenti in sistemi di gestione del consumo dell'energia, efficientamento del parco immobiliare pubblico, incentivi per scommettere su apparecchi e prodotti pi霉 efficienti.

Misure che, abbiamo visto in questo anno di prezzi dell'energia impazziti, sono sempre pi霉 urgenti per abbassare le bollette e per renderci meno dipendenti da paesi terzi.

听听Jadwiga Wi艣niewska (ECR). 鈥� Pani Przewodnicz膮ca! Pani Komisarz! Szanowni Pa艅stwo! Polityka klimatyczna Unii Europejskiej niestety jest przyk艂adem zwyci臋stwa ideologii nad rozumem i rozs膮dkiem. Bezwzgl臋dnie konieczne jest urealnienie polityki klimatyczno鈥揺nergetycznej, tak by sta艂a si臋 instrumentem wzmacniania bezpiecze艅stwa i gospodarki Europy. Niestety, lewicowo鈥搇iberalny mainstream chce de facto doprowadzi膰 do deindustrializacji Europy. Chc膮 Pa艅stwo zwi臋kszy膰 ub贸stwo energetyczne, kt贸re ju偶 obejmuje 40 milion贸w ludzi, a propozycje dotycz膮ce mobilno艣ci doprowadz膮 Uni臋 Europejsk膮 do uzale偶nienia od Chin.

Wed艂ug Mi臋dzynarodowej Agencji Energetycznej prawie 90% komponent贸w fotowoltaiki pochodzi z Chin. Pa艅stwu to nie przeszkadza. Podobnie jest z bateriami elektrycznymi. Niczego Pa艅stwo nie nauczyli si臋 z tej sytuacji, kt贸r膮 przyni贸s艂 nam COVID. Przecie偶 COVID wyra藕nie pokaza艂, 偶e d艂ugie 艂a艅cuchy dostaw mo偶na w ka偶dej chwili zablokowa膰 i przeci膮膰. My musimy zadba膰 o bezpiecze艅stwo, r贸wnie偶 偶ywno艣ciowe obywateli, a Pa艅stwo r贸wnie偶 w t臋 sfer臋 chc膮 uderzy膰. Mam dla Pa艅stwa dobr膮 wiadomo艣膰 鈥� Europejczycy obroni膮 si臋 przed Waszym szale艅stwem, poka偶膮 tej ideologii czerwon膮 kartk臋 w wyborach do Parlamentu Europejskiego w przysz艂ym roku.

听听Jo茫o Pimenta Lopes (The Left). 鈥� Senhora Presidente, a pesquisa e a utiliza莽茫o de combust铆veis alternativos que contribuam para a redu莽茫o da emiss茫o de gases com efeito de estufa associadas ao transporte mar铆timo s茫o uma mudan莽a que se pode afigurar positiva e necess谩ria, mas tem de ser feita tendo em conta as realidades espec铆ficas dos Estados鈥擬embros e do esfor莽o necess谩rio para responder a objetivos de descarboniza莽茫o, alicer莽ada num quadro de investimento p煤blico que garanta essa mudan莽a.

Pesem derroga莽玫es para as regi玫es ultraperif茅ricas, este regulamento preconiza a submiss茫o aos mercados, o alargamento do perverso com茅rcio de emiss玫es, a defesa dos interesses dos grupos econ贸micos que se aproveitam do fil茫o das energias renov谩veis e dos gestores privados dos portos principais dos Estados-Membros e a perda de relev芒ncia do setor mar铆timo e portu谩rio de pa铆ses perif茅ricos como Portugal.

Este regulamento, como de resto todo o chamado Pacote 55, 茅 mais um contributo para aumentar desequil铆brios entre os Estados-Membros, deixando para tr谩s, sem surpresa, dimens玫es como o servi莽o p煤blico, o controlo p煤blico de setores estrat茅gicos, os direitos dos trabalhadores ou a soberania dos Estados.

听听Jerzy Buzek (PPE). 鈥� Pani Przewodnicz膮ca, Pani Komisarz! Porusz臋 dwie sprawy. Emisje przemys艂owe to trudne, bardzo trudne rozwi膮zanie. Gratuluj臋 sprawozdawcom, bo uda艂o si臋 doprowadzi膰 je do ko艅ca. S膮dz臋, 偶e trzeba w jaki艣 spos贸b poprawi膰 to rozwi膮zanie w czasie naszego g艂osowania i i艣膰 w kierunku pomocy przemys艂owi, aby mocniej przekierowa膰 inwestycje na zielon膮 transformacj臋 i ustali膰 orientacyjny charakter dopuszczalnych wielko艣ci efektywno艣ci 艣rodowiskowej. Zach臋cam do poparcia tych poprawek.

Je艣li chodzi o efektywno艣膰 energetyczn膮, to jest w og贸le najwa偶niejsza sprawa. Wszyscy o tym wiemy. Ale tu mamy powody do satysfakcji. Zabiega艂em o poprawki tak偶e w komisji i o to, aby spe艂niono postulaty bran偶y ciep艂owniczej. W definicjach efektywnych system贸w ciep艂owniczych i sprawnej kogeneracji. W moim kraju, na przyk艂ad, a偶 15 mln ludzi jest zale偶nych od bran偶y ciep艂owniczej i od dobrego rozwi膮zania zwi膮zanego z efektywno艣ci膮 energetyczn膮.

听听Nicol谩s Gonz谩lez Casares (S&D). 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, estamos completando los dosieres del paquete de medidas 芦Objetivo 55禄. Se van a aprobar posiciones y ratificar acuerdos cruciales para el futuro descarbonizado de la Uni贸n. Adelante.

Quiero destacar el importante salto que da la Uni贸n Europea con la rectificaci贸n de esta Directiva de eficiencia energ茅tica. Con m谩s eficiencia energ茅tica tambi茅n se combate la pobreza energ茅tica. En este sentido quiero destacar que, por primera vez, habr谩 una definici贸n de pobreza energ茅tica europea, as铆 como medidas enfocadas a aliviar y empoderar a los consumidores. Esto tambi茅n lo estamos haciendo en el acuerdo que hicimos la semana pasada, recientemente, en el debate sobre el mercado el茅ctrico europeo: proteger a los m谩s vulnerables e impedir que se desconecten.

Necesitamos avanzar en la lucha contra el cambio clim谩tico, todos juntos, por la descarbonizaci贸n, por tener de verdad un consenso contra la lucha contra el cambio clim谩tico 鈥攁qu铆, en este Parlamento鈥� y no romper los consensos, como est谩n haciendo algunos grupos. No al negacionismo clim谩tico. S铆 a avanzar. Adelante en eso.

Adem谩s, creemos que es imprescindible que la transici贸n energ茅tica sea justa. Necesitamos un objetivo ambicioso y vinculante como el que propone esta Directiva, por primera vez, a nivel europeo.

Quiero dar la enhorabuena tambi茅n a mi compa帽ero Niels Fuglsang y a todos los ponentes por el gran trabajo desarrollado. 隆Adelante con la eficiencia!

听听袠褋泻褉邪 袦懈褏邪泄谢芯胁邪 (Renew). 鈥� 袚-卸芯 袩褉械写褋械写邪褌械谢, 斜械蟹褋锌芯褉薪芯 褑械谢褌邪 蟹邪 薪邪屑邪谢褟胁邪薪械 薪邪 胁褉械写薪懈褌械 械屑懈褋懈懈 芯褌 懈薪写褍褋褌褉懈褟褌邪 械 褔邪褋褌 芯褌 褉械邪谢懈蟹邪褑懈褟褌邪 薪邪 小褌褉邪褌械谐懈褟褌邪 蟹邪 褉邪褋褌械卸 薪邪 袝胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻懈褟 褋褗褞蟹 懈 锌褉械胁褉褗褖邪薪械褌芯 薪邪 袝胁褉芯锌邪 胁 泻谢懈屑邪褌懈褔薪芯 薪械褍褌褉邪谢械薪 泻芯薪褌懈薪械薪褌. 孝芯胁邪 械 薪邪锌褉邪胁谢械薪懈械褌芯 蟹邪 褉邪蟹胁懈褌懈械 薪邪 械胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻邪褌邪 锌褉芯屑懈褕谢械薪芯褋褌 懈 锌褉械写谢芯卸械薪懈械褌芯 薪邪 袝胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻邪褌邪 泻芯屑懈褋懈褟 懈 锌芯蟹懈褑懈褟褌邪 薪邪 袝胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻懈褟 锌邪褉谢邪屑械薪褌 褋邪 芯褌 泻谢褞褔芯胁芯 蟹薪邪褔械薪懈械 蟹邪 褍械写薪邪泻胁褟胁邪薪械 薪邪 芯斜褏胁邪褌邪, 懈薪写懈泻邪褌芯褉懈褌械 懈 褑械谢懈褌械 蟹邪 锌芯褋褌懈谐邪薪械 芯褌 懈薪写褍褋褌褉懈邪谢薪懈褌械 泻芯屑锌邪薪懈懈.

小褗褖械胁褉械屑械薪薪芯 薪懈褌芯 械写薪芯 写芯斜褉芯 薪邪屑械褉械薪懈械 薪械 褌褉褟斜胁邪 写邪 斜褗写械 蟹邪 褋屑械褌泻邪 薪邪 泻芯薪泻褍褉械薪褌薪芯褋锌芯褋芯斜薪芯褋褌褌邪 薪邪 械胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻邪褌邪 懈泻芯薪芯屑懈泻邪 懈 薪械 斜懈 褌褉褟斜胁邪谢芯 写邪 褋褗蟹写邪胁邪 邪写屑懈薪懈褋褌褉邪褌懈胁薪懈 锌褉械褔泻懈 锌褉械写 斜懈蟹薪械褋邪 懈 懈蟹谢懈褕薪邪 斜褞褉芯泻褉邪褑懈褟. 袠 褌芯褔薪芯 褌芯胁邪 械 械写懈薪 芯褌 芯褋薪芯胁薪懈褌械 械谢械屑械薪褌懈 蟹邪 写懈褋泻褍褋懈褟 锌芯 写懈褉械泻褌懈胁邪褌邪, 泻芯褟褌芯 芯斜褋褗卸写邪屑械. 袧械芯斜褏芯写懈屑 械 斜邪谢邪薪褋 屑械卸写褍 懈蟹懈褋泻胁邪薪懈褟, 锌芯褋褌邪胁械薪懈 褑械谢懈 懈 褉械邪谢械薪 泻邪锌邪褑懈褌械褌 薪邪 泻芯屑锌邪薪懈懈褌械 蟹邪 锌芯褋褌懈谐邪薪械 薪邪 褌械蟹懈 褑械谢懈. 袪械褕械薪懈械褌芯 械 胁 懈薪芯胁邪褑懈懈褌械, 写懈谐懈褌邪谢懈蟹邪褑懈褟褌邪 懈 锌褉械屑械褉械薪懈褌械 褋褌褗锌泻懈 薪邪 锌芯褋谢械写芯胁邪褌械谢薪芯 胁褗胁械卸写邪薪械 薪邪 懈蟹懈褋泻胁邪薪懈褟褌邪. 袙 褌邪蟹懈 锌芯褋芯泻邪 褋邪 芯褔邪泻胁邪薪懈褟褌邪 薪邪 斜懈蟹薪械褋邪, 械胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻邪褌邪 懈薪写褍褋褌褉懈褟 懈 懈蟹褋谢械写芯胁邪褌械谢褋泻懈褌械 褑械薪褌褉芯胁械. 孝芯胁邪 褋械 芯褔邪泻胁邪 懈 芯褌 袝胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻懈褟 锌邪褉谢邪屑械薪褌.

听听Herbert Dorfmann (PPE). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, Frau Kommissarin, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Diese Richtlinie vermischt industrielle Emissionen mit Emissionen in der Landwirtschaft, was an und f眉r sich schon recht eigenartig ist. Aber dazu kommt noch, dass die Kommission landwirtschaftliche Betriebe zu Industriebetrieben erkl盲ren will, die in vielen Mitgliedstaaten ganz normale Familienbetriebe sind. Und das gilt ganz besonders f眉r die Rinderzucht.

Nat眉rlich k枚nnen Emissionen in der Landwirtschaft auch problematisch sein. Aber die Frage, ob sie problematisch sind oder nicht, h盲ngt ganz eindeutig davon ab, ob es ein vern眉nftiges Verh盲ltnis zwischen Futterfl盲che und gehaltenen Tieren gibt. Wenn dieses Verh盲ltnis stimmt, dann ist auch ein gr枚脽erer Betrieb nicht problematisch. Wenn dieses Verh盲ltnis nicht stimmt, dann kann auch ein kleiner Betrieb sehr problematisch sein, was die Emissionen angeht.

Deswegen, denke ich, ist es vern眉nftig, dass wir morgen die 脛nderungsantr盲ge des Agrarausschusses annehmen, dass wir uns dann 眉berlegen, wie man ein vern眉nftiges Kriterium findet, um jene landwirtschaftlichen Betriebe zu identifizieren, die wirklich problematisch sind, was die Emissionen angeht, und dass man nicht ein allgemeines Problem auch f眉r kleine Betriebe schafft.

听听Paolo De Castro (S&D). 鈥� Signora Presidente, signor Commissario, onorevoli colleghi, oggi si apre una plenaria decisiva per le ambizioni che l'Unione si 猫 posta con il green deal.

脠 quindi necessaria un'ampia condivisione politica della strategia che intendiamo seguire, piuttosto che spaccature all'interno del Parlamento che non ci consentiranno di avanzare in modo equilibrato.

In questo senso, per raggiungere efficacemente gli obiettivi di riduzione dell'inquinamento previsti dalla direttiva sulle emissioni industriali, occorre un approccio che contempli non solo i tre livelli di sostenibilit脿, ma anche le specificit脿 di ciascun settore, a partire da quello dell'allevamento.

Il principio "one size fits all" ha infatti ampiamente dimostrato i suoi limiti e, come commissione AGRI, riteniamo quindi sia un errore paragonare le stalle europee alle ciminiere, assoggettando ai vincoli della direttiva anche gli allevamenti bovini.

Un errore scientifico e pratico che rischia di mettere a repentaglio decenni di avanzamento, capaci di farci raggiungere i pi霉 alti standard produttivi e di benessere animale al mondo.

Siamo pronti a lavorare insieme, caro Commissario, per sviluppare politiche altrettanto ambiziose ma che rispettino le peculiarit脿 di differenti filiere produttive, a partire da quella bovina.

听听J茅r茅my Decerle (Renew). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Madame la Commissaire, le sujet des 茅missions polluantes est certainement important, mais je n鈥檌maginais pas que la Commission europ茅enne ne verrait pas l鈥檈rreur grossi猫re qui consiste 脿 faire rentrer au forceps l鈥檃griculture dans un cadre inadapt茅.

Vouloir assimiler l鈥櫭﹍evage europ茅en aux industriels avec autant de l茅g猫ret茅 est dangereux et inop茅rant. C鈥檈st ignorer les progr猫s d茅j脿 faits dans le domaine, gr芒ce notamment 脿 la politique agricole commune. Car si notre agriculture n鈥檈st pas parfaite, elle reste la plus vertueuse au monde. Arr锚tons de la fragiliser, prot茅geons-la.

Le pacte vert, pour r茅ussir, doit cesser de chercher des symboles, des seuils, des chiffres, des contraintes qui, magiquement, r茅gleraient tout. Cela ne marchera pas. Il faut pour l鈥櫭﹍evage une approche globale de la durabilit茅. Alors, pour ma part, pour prot茅ger, pour soutenir les agriculteurs, je ne vois pas d鈥檃utre choix que le statu听quo sur le volet agricole de ce texte.

听听Maria Spyraki (PPE). 鈥� Madam听President, Commissioner听V膬lean, dear colleagues, concluding Fit for 55 package, allow me to focus on the FuelEU Maritime Regulation on which I had the honour to be the shadow rapporteur on behalf of the ENVI Committee. According to my opinion, it is an essential stepping鈥攕tone towards establishing a forward condition for the energy transition of shipping. However, in order to meet our ambitious target, it is essential for the regulation to foster the production of alternative sustainable fuels.

Full decarbonisation of shipping requires alternative low鈥� and zero鈥攃arbon maritime fuels and also breakthrough propulsion technologies to become widely available. To this end, close cooperation and action for all relevant stakeholders in the supply chain as it is, fuel producers, energy providers, shipyards and energy manufacturers, ports as well, is required.

Allow me to underline that the responsibility for the development and availability of renewable alternative fuels lies with the maritime fuel producers and suppliers, and it is important to stick to set obligations for the development and deployment of these fuels as in the case of road transport and aviation. It is a part of the level playing field, dear Commissioner.

Concluding, last but not least, we must always keep in mind that shipping is a global sector which requires global solutions at the IMO level. And in this regard we have to increase the levels we have as an entity, as the EU.

Spontane Wortmeldungen

听听Cristian-Silviu Bu艧oi (PPE). 鈥� Salut pachetul de ini葲iativ膬 葯i 卯n mod special Directiva privind eficien葲a energetic膬. 脦i mul葲umesc colegului Niels Fuglsang. Am avut 葯i onoarea de a conduce o parte din trilogurile de negociere cu Consiliul, mul葲umesc Comisiei Europene 葯i Consiliului.

Este 卯n mod evident un pas 卯nainte c膬tre atingerea 葲intelor strategice: Fit for 55 卯n 2030, Green Deal 卯n 2050, dar 葯i c膬tre independen葲a energetic膬 葯i, mai ales, costuri mai bune pentru cet膬葲eni 葯i economie. Nu trebuie s膬 uit膬m, 卯ns膬, 卯n niciun moment c膬 avem nevoie de o industrie care trebuie s膬 r膬m芒n膬 competitiv膬. Nu trebuie s膬 exager膬m cu obiective mult prea ambi葲ioase sau nerealiste. Trebuie s膬 g膬sim echilibrul necesar s膬 fim mai pu葲in dogmatici 葯i mult mai practici 葯i mai pragmatici.

De aceea, v膬 rog, dragi colegi, ca m芒ine s膬 sus葲ine葲i amendamentele ITRE 葯i s膬 g膬sim acel echilibru necesar care s膬 permit膬 industriei europene s膬 r膬m芒n膬 competitiv膬.

听听Isabel Garc铆a Mu帽oz (S&D). 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, la movilidad debe ser un derecho universal y, por tanto, debemos asegurar que todos los ciudadanos puedan desplazarse libremente por todos los territorios y de la forma m谩s sostenible y justa. Este Pleno, con el voto del Reglamento relativo a la implantaci贸n de una infraestructura para los combustibles alternativos y la iniciativa 芦FuelEU Maritime禄, lo har谩 posible.

Con el Reglamento relativo a la implantaci贸n de una infraestructura para los combustibles alternativos, impulsamos un transporte por carretera m谩s responsable con el medio ambiente, fijando objetivos obligatorios en la distribuci贸n de puntos de recarga el茅ctrica de hidr贸geno, para garantizar que todos los ciudadanos, vivan donde vivan, puedan acceder a ellos f谩cilmente. Esperamos que esto ayude a estimular el uso de veh铆culos m谩s sostenibles y a hacerlos m谩s asequibles.

Con la iniciativa 芦FuelEU Maritime禄, reduciremos emisiones en el sector mar铆timo, impulsando el uso de combustibles renovables e hipocarb贸nicos. Y lo hacemos contando con territorios como Canarias, Baleares y otras regiones costeras, cuya conectividad y desarrollo socioecon贸mico dependen en gran parte del tr谩fico mar铆timo, incluyendo medidas para evitar la fuga de carbono a puertos de terceros Estados y proteger as铆 los puertos europeos como el de Algeciras o el de Valencia.

Seguimos trabajando por un Pacto Verde con el coraz贸n rojo.

听听Clare Daly (The Left). 鈥� Madam President, the Industrial Emissions Directive is obviously aiming to overhaul the management of emissions from over 50听000 areas, including steelworks, chemical and plastics, coal factories and, of course, industrial farms. This is important to tackle greenhouse gas emissions from the point of view of the impact on the environment, but not just that, also the impact on human health.

Every year, air pollution causes 300听000 premature deaths in Europe. The air and water pollution caused by intensive livestock farming is well documented. The health and environmental costs of water pollution due to excess nitrogen and phosphorus amounts to 22听billion a year. But critically, we see that Europe, with less than 10% of the world鈥檚 population, is accounting for 23% of new cancer cases linked to pollution.

Now, there had been a right to compensation introduced in this directive, but it was absolutely weakened down in negotiations. I think that鈥檚 really regrettable. It puts profits over people鈥檚 health. We need to put that back.

听听Ljudmila Novak (PPE). 鈥� Spo拧tovana predsedujo膷a, kolegice in kolegi! Poro膷evalci pravijo, da so dobro sodelovali, in to me res zelo veseli. To nam daje upanje.

Emisije zmanj拧ujemo na razli膷nih podro膷jih: v industriji, v cestnem, pomorskem in letalskem prometu. Veliko vlagamo v razvoj in nove tehnologije. Vse to skupaj mora prinesti pozitivne u膷inke.

Strinjam se tudi s tistimi, ki pravijo, da podpirajo majhne kmetije, saj prispevajo k ve膷ji samooskrbi prebivalcev in se tudi v ve膷ji meri lahko prilagajajo, povzro膷ajo pa tudi manj izpustov. V vseh panogah so potrebni razumni ukrepi, ki so tudi finan膷no podprti in pomagajo tako industriji, prometu, kot tudi kmetijstvu. Samo s skupnimi mo膷mi bomo uspe拧ni.

听听Mick Wallace (The Left). 鈥� Madam President, in order to respond to the current climate, health and biodiversity crises, it is crucial that the EU tackles the pollution coming from Europe鈥檚 most industrialised livestock farms. These farms represent a tiny minority of animal farms in Europe.

Contrary to the false claims made by the big-agri lobby, the Industrial Emissions Directive does not target small and medium family farms. And this is particularly true for the cattle sector. 97听% of all commercial cattle farms in Europe would be untouched by the revised directive. Excluding the entire cattle sector from the Industrial Emissions Directive would only favour the biggest polluters, responsible for the vast majority of ammonia and methane emissions coming from cattle farming.

Ireland has lost 140听000 family farms since the 1970s, largely due to the intensification and consolidation of farming in the country. Small-scale family farms are the backbone of food production in Europe. It is about time we supported them and stopped prioritising big agri, which is part of the problem, not part of the solution.

听听Henna Virkkunen (PPE). 鈥� Arvoisa puhemies, arvoisa komissaari, nyt hyv盲ksytt盲v盲st盲 ilmastopaketista nostan esiin kaksi lains盲盲d盲nt枚盲. Ensinn盲kin meriliikenteen v盲h盲p盲盲st枚iset polttoaineet 鈥� mielest盲ni lopputulos on varsin onnistunut. Lains盲盲d盲nt枚 ottaa nyt huomioon erilaiset teknologiat ja kannustaa markkinaehtoisesti asteittain lis盲盲m盲盲n v盲h盲p盲盲st枚isi盲 polttoaineita meriliikenteess盲. T盲ss盲 on otettu my枚s huomioon alueelliset tarpeet. Esimerkiksi oman kotimaani, Suomen, t盲rke盲 n盲k枚kohta siit盲, ett盲 talvimerenkulku on t盲ss盲 erikseen huomioitu. Se, ett盲 j盲盲vahvisteiset alukset k盲ytt盲v盲t aina enemm盲n polttoainetta ja se on huomioitu nyt t盲ss盲 laskennassa. Haluan kiitt盲盲 t盲st盲 kaikkia neuvottelijoita. Lopputulos on mielest盲ni hyvin onnistunut.

Mutta sen sijaan kritisoin energiatehokkuuteen liittyv盲盲 direktiivi盲. Siin盲 l盲ht枚kohdaksi on nyt otettu se, ett盲 energiank盲ytt枚盲 t盲ytyy v盲hent盲盲 j盲senvaltioissa, sen sijaan, ett盲 kannustettaisiin v盲h盲p盲盲st枚isen energian k盲ytt枚枚n. Esimerkiksi ne maat, joissa on nyt eritt盲in paljon v盲h盲p盲盲st枚ist盲 energiaa, ja jotka haluavat investoida vetytuotantoon. Direktiivi on nyt toimimassa p盲invastoin, kun se painottaa sit盲, ett盲 kaikkien pit盲盲 v盲hent盲盲 energiank盲ytt枚盲, kun pit盲isi kannustaa energiatehokkuuteen ja v盲h盲p盲盲st枚iseen energiaan.

(End of catch-the-eye procedure)

听听Adina-Ioana V膬lean, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam听President, dear Members, this has been a very interesting exchange. I have taken good note of your comments. I will also pass them to my colleagues, Commissioners Simson and Sinkevi膷ius.

We look forward to the formal adoption of the three 鈥楩it for 55鈥� files in the coming weeks. Accelerating the uptake of sustainable alternative fuels and increased energy efficiency are both cornerstones for achieving our 2030 climate ambition. It鈥檚 also an effective contribution to decrease our reliance on fossil fuels imports and improve energy security and air quality in the EU.

On industrial emissions, I hope that 合法博彩网站 will adopt its mandate for the trilogue negotiations this week. A trilogue agreement is still possible before the end of 2023. As always, the Commission remains available for support in this process. Thank you very much, and I wish you a successful session of 合法博彩网站.

听听袪邪写邪薪 袣褗薪械胁, 写芯泻谢邪写褔懈泻. 鈥� 袚-卸芯 袩褉械写褋械写邪褌械谢, 褔褍褏屑械 泻芯谢械谐懈褌械 写芯泻谢邪写褔懈褑懈 芯褌 褋褌褉邪薪邪 薪邪 褋芯褑懈邪谢懈褋褌懈褌械 懈 薪邪 谢懈斜械褉邪谢懈褌械 胁 褌芯蟹懈 锌邪褉谢邪屑械薪褌 写邪 锌芯褋褌邪胁褟褌 芯褋褌褉芯 胁褗锌褉芯褋邪 蟹邪 械褎械泻褌邪 薪邪 懈薪写褍褋褌褉懈邪谢薪懈褌械 械屑懈褋懈懈 胁褗褉褏褍 蟹写褉邪胁械褌芯 薪邪 褏芯褉邪褌邪. 袧芯, 锌芯胁褟褉胁邪泄褌械 屑懈, 褌械屑邪褌邪 蟹邪 蟹写褉邪胁械褌芯 薪邪 谐褉邪卸写邪薪懈褌械 械 锌褗褉胁芯褋褌械锌械薪薪邪 懈 锌褉懈 胁褋褟泻芯 芯斜褋褗卸写邪薪械 胁 屑芯褟褌邪 谐褉褍锌邪, 胁 袝胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻邪褌邪 薪邪褉芯写薪邪 锌邪褉褌懈褟.

效褍褏屑械 泻芯谢械谐懈褌械 懈 芯褌 谐褉褍锌邪褌邪 薪邪 褋芯褑懈邪谢懈褋褌懈褌械, 懈 芯褌 袝袧袩, 锌褉械写褋褌邪胁懈褌械谢懈 薪邪 泻芯屑懈褋懈褟褌邪 锌芯 械薪械褉谐械褌懈泻邪 懈 懈薪写褍褋褌褉懈褟 写邪 锌芯褋褌邪胁褟褌 薪邪 锌褗褉胁芯 屑褟褋褌芯 褌械屑邪褌邪 蟹邪 懈薪芯胁邪褑懈懈褌械. 孝械屑邪褌邪 蟹邪 懈薪芯胁邪褑懈懈褌械 斜械褕械 褋褗褋 褋懈谐褍褉薪芯褋褌 锌褗褉胁芯褋褌械锌械薪械薪 胁褗锌褉芯褋 胁褗胁 胁褋褟泻芯 芯斜褋褗卸写邪薪械 懈 胁 泻芯屑懈褋懈褟褌邪 锌芯 芯泻芯谢薪邪 褋褉械写邪. 效褍褏屑械 泻芯谢械谐懈褌械 芯褌 写褟褋薪邪褌邪 褋褌褉邪薪邪 薪邪 蟹邪谢邪褌邪 写邪 锌芯褋褌邪胁褟褌 泻邪褌芯 锌褉懈芯褉懈褌械褌 胁褗锌褉芯褋邪 蟹邪 褑械薪邪褌邪 薪邪 褋械谢褋泻芯褋褌芯锌邪薪褋泻邪褌邪 锌褉芯写褍泻褑懈褟 懈 芯褌褉邪卸械薪懈械褌芯 薪邪 胁褋褟泻芯 薪邪褕械 蟹邪泻芯薪芯写邪褌械谢褋褌胁芯 胁褗褉褏褍 薪械褟, 薪芯 褔褍褏屑械 懈 锌褉械写褋褌邪胁懈褌械谢懈褌械 薪邪 褋芯褑懈邪谢懈褋褌懈褌械 懈 锌褉械写褋褌邪胁懈褌械谢懈褌械 薪邪 谢懈斜械褉邪谢懈褌械 胁 泻芯屑懈褋懈褟褌邪 锌芯 蟹械屑械写械谢懈械 写邪 锌芯褋褌邪胁褟褌 褌芯蟹懈 胁褗锌褉芯褋 泻邪褌芯 锌褗褉胁芯褋褌械锌械薪械薪. 效褍褏屑械 芯褌 胁褋懈褔泻懈 锌邪褉谢邪屑械薪褌邪褉薪懈 谐褉褍锌懈 械写懈薪芯写褍褕懈械 锌芯 芯褌薪芯褕械薪懈械 薪邪 蟹邪褖懈褌邪褌邪 薪邪 写褉械斜薪懈褌械, 褋械屑械泄薪懈褌械 褎械褉屑械褉懈, 薪芯 懈 褉邪蟹谢懈泻懈 胁 褌芯胁邪 泻芯懈 褌芯褔薪芯 屑械褉泻懈 懈 泻芯懈 懈蟹屑械薪械薪懈褟, 泻芯懈褌芯 褖械 谐谢邪褋褍胁邪屑械 褍褌褉械, 褖械 褋械 芯褌褉邪蟹褟褌 薪邪泄-斜谢邪谐芯锌褉懈褟褌薪芯 胁褗褉褏褍 褉邪蟹胁懈褌懈械褌芯 薪邪 屑邪谢泻懈褌械 懈 褍褋褌芯泄褔懈胁懈 褎械褉屑懈 胁 袝胁褉芯锌邪.

袦芯卸械屑 谢懈 写邪 褋褗蟹写邪写械屑 蟹邪泻芯薪芯写邪褌械谢褋褌胁芯, 泻芯械褌芯 写邪 芯褌谐芯胁邪褉褟 薪邪 胁褋懈褔泻懈 褌械蟹懈 褌褉械胁芯谐懈 械写薪芯胁褉械屑械薪薪芯? 袦芯褟褌 锌褉芯褋褌 芯褌谐芯胁芯褉 械 写邪, 懈 锌芯 写懈褉械泻褌懈胁邪褌邪 蟹邪 懈薪写褍褋褌褉懈邪谢薪懈褌械 械屑懈褋懈懈 褋屑械 屑薪芯谐芯 斜谢懈蟹芯 写芯 褌芯蟹懈 锌芯谢芯卸懈褌械谢械薪 芯褌谐芯胁芯褉. 袧芯 蟹邪 写邪 锌芯褋褌懈谐薪械屑 褌邪泻芯胁邪 蟹邪泻芯薪芯写邪褌械谢褋褌胁芯, 褌褉褟斜胁邪 写邪 褋懈 锌芯褋褌邪胁懈屑 械写薪邪 芯褋薪芯胁薪邪 褑械谢 懈 褌褟 械 写懈邪谢芯谐褗褌 写邪 薪械 褋胁褗褉褕懈 褍褌褉械, 邪 写邪 蟹邪锌芯褔薪械 褍褌褉械. 袟邪褖芯褌芯 薪懈械 懈屑邪屑械 锌褉械谐芯胁芯褉懈 懈 褋褗褋 小褗胁械褌邪, 薪芯 锌褉械写懈 胁褋懈褔泻芯 蟹邪褖芯褌芯 袛懈褉械泻褌懈胁邪褌邪 蟹邪 懈薪写褍褋褌褉懈邪谢薪懈褌械 械屑懈褋懈懈 械 芯褋薪芯胁邪薪邪 薪邪 锌褉懈薪褑懈锌邪 薪邪 写懈邪谢芯谐邪 屑械卸写褍 蟹邪懈薪褌械褉械褋芯胁邪薪懈褌械 谢懈褑邪, 屑械卸写褍 写褗褉卸邪胁懈褌械, 袣芯屑懈褋懈褟褌邪, 懈薪写褍褋褌褉懈懈褌械, 芯褉谐邪薪懈蟹邪褑懈懈褌械, 泻芯懈褌芯 褋械 斜芯褉褟褌 蟹邪 锌芯-写芯斜褉邪 芯泻芯谢薪邪 褋褉械写邪 懈 锌芯-写芯斜褉芯 芯斜褖械褋褌胁械薪芯 蟹写褉邪胁械. 袛懈邪谢芯谐褗褌, 泻芯泄褌芯 褋械 锌褉芯胁械卸写邪 胁 小械胁懈谢褟.

孝邪泻邪 褔械 褋 谐谢邪褋褍胁邪薪械褌芯 褍褌褉械, 蟹邪 泻芯械褌芯 芯褖械 胁械写薪褗卸 锌褉懈蟹芯胁邪胁邪屑 写邪 薪械 褋褌懈谐邪屑械 写芯 泻褉邪泄薪芯褋褌懈, 薪懈械 褌械锌褗褉胁邪 蟹邪锌芯褔胁邪屑械 写懈邪谢芯谐邪 锌芯 懈蟹谐褉邪卸写邪薪械 薪邪 械写薪芯 褉邪斜芯褌械褖芯 械胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻芯 蟹邪泻芯薪芯写邪褌械谢褋褌胁芯 懈 蟹邪 蟹写褉邪胁械褌芯 薪邪 褏芯褉邪褌邪, 懈 蟹邪 蟹写褉邪胁械褌芯 薪邪 械胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻邪褌邪 懈薪写褍褋褌褉懈褟 懈 蟹械屑械写械谢懈械.

听听袩械褌褗褉 袙懈褌邪薪芯胁, 写芯泻谢邪写褔懈泻. 鈥� 袚-卸芯 袩褉械写褋械写邪褌械谢, 邪蟹 屑懈褋谢褟, 褔械 褋褗屑 芯斜谢邪谐芯写械褌械谢褋褌胁邪薪, 蟹邪褖芯褌芯 锌芯 褉械谐谢邪屑械薪褌邪, 锌芯 泻芯泄褌芯 邪蟹 懈屑邪褏 褔械褋褌褌邪 写邪 谐芯胁芯褉褟 锌芯褔褌懈 薪褟屑邪褕械 蟹邪斜械谢械卸泻懈. 孝芯胁邪 械 械写薪邪 邪褌械褋褌邪褑懈褟 蟹邪 芯褌谢懈褔薪芯 褋胁褗褉褕械薪邪褌邪 褉邪斜芯褌邪 懈 褋懈屑斜懈芯蟹邪褌邪 屑械卸写褍 褉邪蟹谢懈褔薪懈褌械 写芯泻谢邪写褔懈褑懈 胁 褋褟薪泻邪 懈 芯褋薪芯胁薪懈褟褌 写芯泻谢邪写褔懈泻.

袛胁械 薪械褖邪 芯斜邪褔械 屑懈 薪邪锌褉邪胁懈褏邪 胁锌械褔邪褌谢械薪懈械. 小锌芯屑械薪邪 褋械 械写薪邪 芯褌 屑邪谢泻芯褌芯 泻褉懈褌懈泻懈 写邪 芯褋褌邪胁懈屑 薪械褖邪褌邪 薪邪 锌邪蟹邪褉邪, 邪屑邪 写芯泻芯谐邪 褖械 谐芯 芯褋褌邪胁褟屑械 薪邪 锌邪蟹邪褉邪? 袛芯泻芯谐邪 褖械 谐芯 芯褋褌邪胁褟屑械 薪邪 锌械褔邪谢斜懈, 泻芯谐邪褌芯 谐芯胁芯褉懈屑 蟹邪 懈蟹泻芯锌邪械屑懈褌械 谐芯褉懈胁邪? 孝芯褔薪芯 褌械蟹懈, 泻芯懈褌芯 芯斜邪褔械 谐械薪械褉懈褉邪褌 锌械褔邪谢斜懈, 褌械 薪械 屑芯谐邪褌 写邪 褍褋械褌褟褌 薪邪斜谢懈卸邪胁邪褖邪褌邪 泻邪褌邪褋褌褉芯褎邪. 袟邪褖芯? 袟邪褖芯褌芯 屑芯谐邪褌 写邪 褋懈 锌芯蟹胁芯谢褟褌 写邪 卸懈胁械褟褌 薪邪 胁懈褋芯泻芯, 泻褗写械褌芯 胁褗蟹写褍褏褗褌 械 褔懈褋褌, 屑芯谐邪褌 写邪 褋懈 锌芯蟹胁芯谢褟胁邪褌 写邪 褟写邪褌 泻邪褔械褋褌胁械薪邪 褏褉邪薪邪.

小邪屑芯 褔械 褌邪蟹懈 泻谢懈屑邪褌懈褔薪邪 泻邪褌邪褋褌褉芯褎邪 褍写褉褟 斜械写薪懈褌械 薪械锌褉芯锌芯褉褑懈芯薪邪谢薪芯 懈 薪械褋锌褉邪胁械写谢懈胁芯, 蟹邪褖芯褌芯 褌械 薪械 屑芯谐邪褌 薪懈褌芯 写邪 卸懈胁械褟褌 泻褗写械褌芯 锌芯懈褋泻邪褌, 薪懈褌芯 写邪 褟写邪褌 泻邪泻胁邪褌芯 褏褉邪薪邪 懈褋泻邪褌, 薪懈褌芯 写邪 褋械 谢械泻褍胁邪褌, 泻芯谐邪褌芯 褋褌邪胁邪 写褍屑邪 蟹邪 械胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻芯 蟹写褉邪胁械, 蟹邪 蟹写褉邪胁械褌芯 薪邪 谐褉邪卸写邪薪懈褌械 写邪 褋械 谢械泻褍胁邪褌 泻邪泻褌芯 懈褋泻邪褌. 袟邪褌芯胁邪 褋懈 屑懈褋谢褟, 褔械 泻芯谐邪褌芯 谐芯胁芯褉懈屑 蟹邪 蟹邪写褗谢卸邪胁邪褖懈 懈蟹懈褋泻胁邪薪懈褟 褌芯胁邪 械 懈蟹泻谢褞褔懈褌械谢薪芯 胁邪卸薪芯, 蟹邪褖芯褌芯 褋邪屑芯 褌械 谐邪褉邪薪褌懈褉邪褌 懈薪褎褉邪褋褌褉褍泻褌褍褉邪褌邪. 袗 泻芯谐邪褌芯 懈屑邪屑械 懈薪褎褉邪褋褌褉褍泻褌褍褉邪, 懈屑邪屑械 褔懈褋褌懈褟 褌褉邪薪褋锌芯褉褌, 褌褉邪薪褋锌芯褉褌邪 薪邪 斜褗写械褖械褌芯, 蟹邪褖芯褌芯 邪泻芯 谐芯 薪褟屑邪屑械, 屑芯卸械 写邪 懈蟹锌邪写薪械屑 锌邪泻 胁 懈蟹芯谢邪褑懈褟, 锌邪泻 写邪 懈屑邪 袝胁褉芯锌邪 薪邪 写胁械 褋泻芯褉芯褋褌懈 懈 胁褗锌褉械泻懈 谐械芯谐褉邪褎褋泻芯褌芯 锌芯谢芯卸械薪懈械 薪邪 械写薪邪 懈谢懈 写褉褍谐邪 写褗褉卸邪胁邪, 褌芯胁邪, 褔械 薪褟屑邪 锌褉懈谢械卸邪褖邪 懈薪褎褉邪褋褌褉褍泻褌褍褉邪 写邪 褟 锌褉械胁褗褉薪械 胁 懈泻芯薪芯屑懈褔械褋泻邪 锌褍褋褌懈薪褟.

袠 屑芯卸械 斜懈 芯褖械 薪械褖芯 蟹邪 懈薪褎褉邪褋褌褉褍泻褌褍褉邪褌邪. 袠 褌褍泻 屑芯谐邪 写邪 褍褋锌芯泻芯褟 锌邪蟹邪褉薪懈褌械 褎褍薪写邪屑械薪褌邪谢懈褋褌懈. 袙褋褗褖薪芯褋褌 懈蟹懈褋泻胁邪薪械褌芯 蟹邪 懈蟹谐褉邪卸写邪薪械 薪邪 懈薪褎褉邪褋褌褉褍泻褌褍褉邪 褖械 胁褗褉薪械 锌邪蟹邪褉薪懈褟 屑芯写械谢, 邪 锌邪蟹邪褉薪懈褟褌 屑芯写械谢 褌芯谐邪胁邪 褖械 写芯胁械写械 写芯 褌邪屑, 褔械 械谢械泻褌褉懈褔械褋泻懈褌械 邪胁褌芯屑芯斜懈谢懈 薪褟屑邪 写邪 斜褗写邪褌 褋邪屑芯 懈谐褉邪褔泻邪 懈 谢褍泻褋 蟹邪 斜芯谐邪褌懈褌械, 邪 褖械 屑芯谐邪褌 写邪 斜褗写邪褌 芯斜褖芯写芯褋褌褗锌薪懈.

VORSITZ: OTHMAR KARAS
痴颈锄别辫谤盲蝉颈诲别苍迟

听听J枚rgen Warborn, 蹿枚谤别诲谤补驳补苍诲别. 鈥� Herr talman! K盲ra kollegor. Denna debatt har handlat om fyra olika 盲renden, och det 盲r ganska tydligt att fartygsbr盲nslef枚rordningen inte har f氓tt den mesta talartiden, utan det har ist盲llet varit industriutsl盲ppsdirektivet.

Jag tar det som int盲kt f枚r att vi, n盲r det g盲ller sj枚fartens klimatomst盲llning, har hittat r盲tt balans mellan konkurrenskraft, klimatet och de sociala fr氓gorna. Jag tar det ocks氓 till int盲kt f枚r att det, n盲r det g盲ller just industriutsl盲ppsdirektivet, finns mer att g枚ra d盲r. Jag st枚ttar dem som tycker att kossor inte ska definieras inom ramen f枚r industriutsl盲pp.

De talare som har n盲mnt fartygens klimatomst盲llning har talat mycket om just konkurrenskraft. Det har handlat om klimatet, naturligtvis, och det har handlat om inflation och de 枚kade kostnaderna. Det 盲r en bra balans vi har hittat och jag hoppas att vi kommer att ha den h盲r enigheten n盲r vi r枚star imorgon ocks氓, s氓 att sj枚fartssektorn kan f氓 den f枚ruts盲gbarhet och den arbetsro som beh枚vs och s氓 att EU:s f枚rhandlare kan 氓ka till IMO och med r氓g i ryggen skapa en konkret f盲rdplan som kan skalas upp globalt.

L氓t mig ocks氓 personligen s盲ga att jag 盲r v盲ldigt n枚jd 枚ver att vi har f氓tt genomslag f枚r principen 鈥漞n in, en ut鈥� i den h盲r lagstiftningen. Kommissionen 氓l盲ggs nu att mycket noga 枚vervaka regelb枚rdan och s盲kerst盲lla att den inte blommar ut f枚r mycket. Detta 盲r oerh枚rt viktigt f枚r europeiska f枚retags konkurrenskraft och jag hoppas att den kan g盲lla i alla framtida lagf枚rslag och i alla sektorer.

F枚r att avsluta: jag 盲r inte s盲ker p氓 att tolkarna kan 枚vers盲tta det h盲r uttrycket fr氓n svenska, men det k盲nns v盲ldigt sk枚nt att konstatera att nu 盲r vi 盲ntligen i hamn!

听听Niels Fuglsang, rapporteur. 鈥� Mr President, dear colleagues, dear Commissioner, I think this debate has been fruitful and it shows that we are in this House very much aware that we need to act and we need to act now. These legislative proposals that are on the table 鈥� I hope they will get a majority, all of them, because we need certainly stronger rules to deliver on our climate ambitions and our energy independence ambitions.

Some of you have talked about whether this Energy Efficiency Directive is binding, to which degree it is binding. Well, for the first time, we have an Energy Efficiency Directive which is binding for the EU as a whole. Previous directives on energy efficiency have not been binding. They have been indicative. Also for Member States individually, they will have to deliver on these measures that are in the Directive. They will have to make plans and show how they can increase energy efficiency and reduce energy consumption.

We have actually, in this Directive, given the Commission, the tools to, if Member States do not act, if they are falling behind and they are not showing how they will catch up on energy savings, then the Commission has the mandate to infringe them and to take them to court. I think this is an important part of the Directive. We don鈥檛 wish for anyone to be taken to court, but we wish and mean that this Directive needs to be implemented.

Everybody, all the Member States need to take it serious. They need to increase the energy efficiency, and if they do not, well, there can be legal consequences. I think that is important because we have seen that in previous efforts have not been sufficient. Actually, we are not delivering on our ambitions as it is right now. So we need to take more actions, and I think I am convinced that this Directive will lead to exactly that point.

听听Der Pr盲sident. 鈥� Die gemeinsame Aussprache ist geschlossen.

Die Abstimmung findet morgen, Dienstag, 11.听Juli 2023, statt.

Schriftliche Erkl盲rungen (Artikel 171)

听听Isabel Carvalhais (S&D), por escrito. 鈥� Uma diretiva atualizada relativa 脿s emiss玫es industriais 茅 um instrumento legislativo muito importante, quer na defesa da sa煤de p煤blica e na cria莽茫o de uma rela莽茫o mais equilibrada com o meio ambiente, quer na prossecu莽茫o da neutralidade clim谩tica para 2050. Ou seja, 茅 uma pe莽a essencial 脿 concretiza莽茫o do pr贸prio Pacto Ecol贸gico Europeu.

Contudo, a proposta da Comiss茫o Europeia apresentava, em particular no caso da produ莽茫o pecu谩ria, uma marcada dist芒ncia da realidade e at茅 mesmo do bom senso. A urg锚ncia exige ambi莽茫o, mas sem atendermos 脿s necessidades e limita莽玫es daqueles que, como os agricultores, t锚m de concretizar as a莽玫es no terreno, a ambi莽茫o cai por terra. A ambi莽茫o imp玫e-se, mas deve ser justa para as pessoas e feita com as pessoas.

听听Sara Cerdas (S&D), por escrito. 鈥� A transi莽茫o energ茅tica no setor do transporte mar铆timo apresenta diversas dificuldades, consequ锚ncia de infraestruturas limitadas e da depend锚ncia de tecnologias emergentes. N茫o obstante, importa destacar que a transi莽茫o energ茅tica no transporte mar铆timo traz oportunidades, como a melhoria da qualidade do ar nas 谩reas portu谩rias e a redu莽茫o das emiss玫es de gases com efeito de estufa. O setor mar铆timo 茅 essencial para o desenvolvimento das economias dos pa铆ses e regi玫es costeiras, em especial as Regi玫es Ultraperif茅ricas, nomeadamente no transporte mar铆timo de pessoas e bens ou no desenvolvimento econ贸mico de v谩rios setores, como o turismo.

As isen莽玫es nas viagens de e para os portos localizadas nas Regi玫es Ultraperif茅ricas v茫o ao encontro das especificidades destas regi玫es e da necessidade de salvaguardar a economia mar铆tima. A redu莽茫o, em 50%, da obrigatoriedade da utiliza莽茫o de combust铆veis sustent谩veis no transporte mar铆timo para as viagens de e para as RUP permitir谩 uma transi莽茫o energ茅tica justa e que protege a coes茫o territorial destas regi玫es. Felizmente, mostramos ser poss铆vel defender a transi莽茫o energ茅tica sem deixar nenhuma regi茫o para tr谩s, garantindo mais flexibilidade e tempo de adapta莽茫o 脿 transi莽茫o verde.

听听Andor Deli (NI), 铆谤谩蝉产补苍. 鈥� Az alternat铆v 眉zemanyag infrastrukt煤r谩ra vonatkoz贸 rendelet elfogad谩sa egy nagyon fontos el艖felt茅tele annak, hogy felgyorsuljon az elektromos 茅s hidrog茅n t枚lt艖谩llom谩sok ki茅p铆t茅se, ami n茅lk眉l megval贸s铆thatatlan az 谩t谩ll谩s a alternat铆v meghajt谩s煤 j谩rm疟vekre. A technol贸giai neutralit谩s azonban megk铆v谩nja az egy茅b, karbonsemleges 眉zemanyagok, mint pl. az e- vagy bio眉zemanyagok t谩mogat谩s谩t is. Hiszen ezek 茅pp ebben az 谩tmenti id艖szakban j谩tszhatnak kiemelked艖 szerepet, megteremtve a lehet艖s茅g茅t annak, hogy a bels艖 茅g茅s疟 motorokat fokozatosan lev谩lasszuk a k艖olajalap煤 眉zemanyagokr贸l, 茅s ezzel egy煤ttal meg艖rizz眉k az eur贸pai j谩rm疟ipar vil谩gpiaci poz铆ci贸j谩t, 茅s 铆gy munkahelyek t铆zezreit.

V茅gezet眉l, nem vesz铆thetj眉k szem el艖l a megl茅v艖 j谩rm疟flott谩kat sem, illetve azt a t茅nyt, hogy sz谩mos KKV-nek 茅s polg谩rnak nem lesz m贸dj谩ban majd z茅r贸 kibocs谩t谩s煤 j谩rm疟re v谩ltani, viszont szeretn茅nek 艖k is hozz谩j谩rulni a z枚ld 谩t谩ll谩shoz. Ez茅rt a 鈥瀞enkit sem hagyunk h谩tra鈥� elv茅t k枚vetve fokozottan kell t谩mogatni a megl茅v艖 flott谩k fiatal铆t谩s谩t. Ha egy EURO 4-es 5-枚s kamiont, EURO 6-osra v谩ltunk, m谩r jelent艖s CO2 cs枚kkent茅st tudunk el茅rni.

听听Andr谩s Gy眉rk (NI), 铆谤谩蝉产补苍. 鈥� A h谩bor煤 茅s az Eur贸pai Bizotts谩g 谩ltal rosszul megalkotott szankci贸s politika miatt az eur贸pai polg谩roknak 茅s v谩llalkoz谩soknak az Eur贸pai Uni贸 t枚rt茅net茅nek legs煤lyosabb energiav谩ls谩g谩val kellett megk眉zdenie. A piaci 谩rak elszabadultak, 茅s csak a polg谩rok 谩ldozatv谩llal谩s谩nak 茅s a tag谩llamok felel艖s int茅zked茅seinek k枚sz枚nhet艖en ker眉lt眉k el az ell谩t谩si neh茅zs茅geket. Bebizonyosodott, hogy az elegend艖 mennyis茅g疟 茅s megfizethet艖 energia l茅tfontoss谩ggal b铆r az eur贸pai gazdas谩g m疟k枚dtet茅s茅hez. Az uni贸 energiaf眉ggetlens茅g茅nek megteremt茅s茅ben a biztons谩gos energiaell谩t谩s mellett az energiahat茅konys谩g is kiemelt szereppel b铆r.

Egy茅rtelm疟, hogy az a legolcs贸bb, legtiszt谩bb energia, amit nem fogyasztunk el. Az energiahat茅konys谩gi ir谩nyelv azonban, ebben a form谩ban, ink谩bb h谩tr谩ltatja az energiamegtakar铆t谩si t枚rekv茅seket. Egyr茅szt, a javaslatban megfogalmazott c茅lkit疟z茅sek nem veszik figyelembe K枚z茅p-Eur贸pa orsz谩gainak saj谩tos helyzet茅t. Br眉sszel 茅s a baloldal betiltan谩k a fosszilis energiafelhaszn谩l谩sban el茅rt energiamegtakar铆t谩s elsz谩molhat贸s谩g谩t is, amivel olyan beruh谩z谩sokra k枚telezn茅k a tag谩llamokat, melyek nem kivitelezhet艖k k枚lts茅ghat茅kony m贸don. M谩sr茅szt az energiahat茅konys谩gi projektek komplex, t艖keig茅nyes folyamatok. Ezek megval贸s铆t谩s谩hoz a Bizotts谩gnak fel kell hagynia a Magyarorsz谩gnak 茅s Lengyelorsz谩gnak j谩r贸 uni贸s forr谩sok blokkol谩s谩val 茅s minden tag谩llamnak azonnali hozz谩f茅r茅st kell biztos铆tania az 艖t megillet艖 t谩mogat谩sokhoz.

V茅g眉l elfogadhatatlan, hogy a baloldal az energiahat茅konys谩g k茅rd茅s茅t is a genderideol贸gia el艖mozd铆t谩s谩ra haszn谩lja. Az energiav谩ls谩g kezel茅s茅hez 茅s az energiaf眉ggetlens茅g megteremt茅s茅hez ez nem j谩rul hozz谩. Ehelyett ink谩bb felel艖s 茅s gazdas谩gilag, valamint t谩rsadalmilag megval贸s铆that贸 jogszab谩lyokra lenne sz眉ks茅g.

听听Nora Mebarek (S&D), par 茅crit. 鈥� Alors que la plan猫te bat quotidiennement des records de temp茅ratures et que l鈥橴E est la r茅gion du monde qui se r茅chauffe le plus rapidement, la mise en 艙uvre du Pacte Vert est plus que jamais une n茅cessit茅 vitale. C鈥檈st pourquoi j鈥檈xhorte mes coll猫gues 脿 adopter massivement le texte sur le d茅ploiement des carburants alternatifs, car il apportera une contribution essentielle au respect de nos engagements en faveur du climat. Nous le savons, les transports sont responsables d'environ un quart des 茅missions de CO2 en Europe. Or, nous sommes 脿 la traine en termes d鈥櫭﹍ectrification de notre r茅seau routier, et ce alors que 2035 et la fin des moteurs thermiques se profile. Ce texte est donc tout aussi important pour nos concitoyens, car il doit les convaincre que traverser l鈥橢urope en voiture 茅lectrique sera bient么t aussi simple et pratique qu鈥檃vec une voiture thermique.

Adopter ce texte, c鈥檈st enfin pr茅server la sant茅 de nos concitoyens, et particuli猫rement ceux qui r茅sident dans des zones portuaires, o霉 les 茅missions des bateaux contaminent l鈥檃ir de villes enti猫res. Les exigences en mati猫re d鈥檃limentation 茅lectrique pour les navires 脿 quai vont permettre de r茅duire l鈥檈xposition de millions d鈥檈urop茅ens 脿 la pollution et ainsi 茅viter de nombreux cancers.

听听Der Pr盲sident. 鈥� Als n盲chster Punkt der Tagesordnung folgt die Aussprache 眉ber den Bericht von Tiemo W枚lken im Namen des Rechtsausschusses 眉ber den Vorschlag f眉r eine Richtlinie des Europ盲ischen Parlaments und des Rates zum Schutz von Personen, die sich 枚ffentlich beteiligen, vor offenkundig unbegr眉ndeten oder missbr盲uchlichen Gerichtsverfahren (鈥瀞trategische Klagen gegen 枚ffentliche Beteiligung鈥�) ( 鈥� C9-0161/2022 鈥� (础9鈥�0223/2023).

听听Tiemo W枚lken, Berichterstatter. 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen, sehr geehrte Frau Kommissarin, sch枚n, dass Sie heute da sind. Wir m眉ssen 眉ber ein wichtiges Thema reden. Wir m眉ssen dar眉ber reden, dass unsere Rechtssysteme ausgenutzt werden, um Berichterstattung zu unterdr眉cken, an der wir als Allgemeinheit ein gro脽es Interesse haben. Wir m眉ssen dar眉ber reden, dass Berichterstattung, die Teil des 枚ffentlichen Diskurses ist, immer h盲ufiger von reichen Menschen, von Menschen mit viel Macht, von Unternehmen zum Schweigen gebracht wird. Das darf es in der Europ盲ischen Union, die darauf stolz ist, dass wir eine Pressefreiheit haben, die stark ist, nicht geben. Das darf es in der Europ盲ischen Union nicht geben, denn die Pressefreiheit ist ein Grundpfeiler der Demokratie. Ohne Kontrolle der M盲chtigen ist eine Demokratie, die funktioniert, nicht vorstellbar.

Trotzdem sehen wir in immer mehr europ盲ischen L盲ndern, dass es diese Klagen, die gegen Journalistinnen und Journalisten, NGOs, Aktivistinnen und Aktivisten gef眉hrt werden, immer h盲ufiger gibt. Diese Klagen werden nicht gef眉hrt, weil man ein Problem mit etwas hat, mit einer Berichterstattung zum Beispiel, sondern diese Klagen werden allein deswegen gef眉hrt, weil man das Opfer zum Schweigen bringen m枚chte. Deswegen geht es gar nicht darum, den Fall zu gewinnen, sondern es geht wirklich darum, Menschen听鈥� Journalistinnen und Journalisten, NGOs, Aktivistinnen und Aktivisten听鈥� mundtot zu machen. Das d眉rfen wir nicht zulassen in der Europ盲ischen Union.

Deswegen bin ich so froh, dass die Europ盲ische Kommission einen Vorschlag gemacht hat, nachdem wir im Parlament ja auch schon einen sehr starken Initiativbericht geschrieben hatten. Ich hoffe, dass wir dann mit den Mitgliedstaaten zusammen eine starke Gesetzgebung hinbekommen, die Journalistinnen und Journalisten, Aktivistinnen und Aktivisten besser sch眉tzt. Denn das ist dringend notwendig.

Was wollen wir als Parlament? Wir wollen, dass Opfer von SLAPP-Klagen den Grund einbringen k枚nnen, dass es sich um eine SLAPP-Klage handelt, und die Klage deswegen fr眉hzeitig abgewiesen wird, um langwierige Verfahren und teure Verfahren fr眉hzeitig zu beenden. Denn es ist nicht nur so, dass die Klage die Menschen, die davon betroffen sind, belastet, sondern es f眉hrt ja auch dazu, dass man sich Gedanken macht, ob man sich die Rechtsverteidigung leisten kann. Man muss zu Gerichtsterminen erscheinen, und das f眉hrt auch dazu, dass andere auch weniger berichten. Und das alles ist eine echte Gefahr f眉r unsere Demokratie.

Wir wollen, dass Opfer von SLAPP-Klagen einen Anspruch auf Schadenersatz haben, um tats盲chlich diese Klagen f眉r diejenigen, die die Klage f眉hren, auch teuer zu machen. Und wir wollen, dass den Menschen, die Opfer von SLAPP-Klagen sind, geholfen wird, indem wir die Beweislast umkehren. Das hei脽t: Derjenige, der die Klage erhebt, muss vorbringen, dass es sich nicht um eine SLAPP-Klage handelt.

Wir fordern die Mitgliedstaaten dazu auf, eine zentrale Anlaufstelle zu schaffen, an die sich Opfer von SLAPP-Klagen wenden k枚nnen, wo sie Hilfe bekommen, wo Psychologinnen und Psychologen arbeiten, wo Rechtsanw盲ltinnen und Rechtsanw盲lte arbeiten, die darauf spezialisiert sind. Und wir wollen die 脺berarbeitung des internationalen anwendbaren Privatrechts erreichen: Br眉ssel听I und Rom听II. Denn leider ist es so, dass gerade diese m盲chtigen Unternehmen, die reichen Menschen es sich leisten k枚nnen, den Gerichtsstand auszusuchen, und dann dort klagen, wo sie am meisten Erfolgsaussichten haben, und nicht dort, wo sie eigentlich klagen m眉ssten. Auch das ist eine weitere H眉rde f眉r die Betroffenen von SLAPP-Klagen.

Jetzt kann man sagen: Na ja, das sind wenige F盲lle. Aber es sind immer mehr F盲lle. Ich habe gerade in den Medien gelesen, dass ein ehemaliger Chef einer deutschen Boulevardzeitung tats盲chlich gegen eine Berichterstattung 眉ber seine private Geburtstagsfeier vorgeht, obwohl er Chef einer Zeitung war, die 眉ber solche Feiern immer berichtet, wenn es auch nur ansatzweise Interesse daran gibt. Und er geht nicht gegen die Financial Times vor, weil er sich da vorstellen kann, dass der Verlag es sich leisten kann, die Klage durchzufechten. Er geht aber gegen ein kleines neues Unternehmen vor, und das ist genau ein Beispiel daf眉r, worum es geht. Genau diesen Missbrauch m眉ssen wir verhindern, und daf眉r brauchen wir ein starkes Anti-SLAPP-Gesetz. Ich hoffe, dass wir das hier morgen auch gemeinsam verabschieden k枚nnen.

听听Ramona Strugariu, Raportoare pentru aviz, Comisia pentru libert膬葲i civile, justi葲ie 葯i afaceri interne. 鈥� Domnule pre葯edinte, 卯ncep prin a mul葲umi colegilor care au f膬cut posibil ca ast膬zi s膬 avem o propunere at芒t de curajoas膬, care va fi adoptat膬 卯n plenul Parlamentului European, lui Tiemo W枚lken 葯i echipelor de negociere 葯i comisarei V臎ra Jourov谩, pentru c膬 la 葯ase ani de la moartea lui Daphne Caruana Galizia, ceea ce era c芒ndva un vis a devenit, 卯n sf芒r葯it, realitate 葯i are o contribu葲ie direct膬 la acest lucru.

葮i a葯 vrea s膬 continui cu o poveste de acum, a葯a cum a 卯nceput colegul meu, din Rom芒nia, unde doi jurnali葯ti foarte curajo葯i de la dou膬 platforme media independente, Buletin de Bucure葯ti 葯i Centrul pentru Investiga葲ii Media, au scos la iveal膬 una dintre cele mai brutale 葯i crude pove葯ti ale ultimilor ani. Leg膬tura dintre ni葯te mini葯tri 葯i apropia葲ii lor 葯i o re葲ea de azile de b膬tr芒ni 卯n care sunt chinui葲i, 卯nfometa葲i 葯i b膬tu葲i oameni 卯n v芒rst膬 bolnavi 葯i f膬r膬 niciun fel de ap膬rare, o re葲ea de tor葲ionari de b膬tr芒ni 卯n Europa a secolului XXI, posibil膬 cu complicitatea unor politicieni. Datorit膬 acestor jurnali葯ti 葯i unui ONG foarte curajos, Centrul pentru Resurse Juridice, ast膬zi avem un caz 卯n justi葲ie 葯i o anchet膬 de amploare a procurorilor 卯n plin膬 desf膬葯urare. 葮ti葲i care a fost reac葲ia doamnei ministru vizat膬 卯n aceast膬 anchet膬? C膬 va da 卯n judecat膬 toat膬 presa care a reac葲ionat 葯i care a legat numele ei 葯i al familiei ei de aceast膬 anchet膬.

De asta avem nevoie de o directiv膬 european膬 anti-SLAPP foarte curajoas膬 葯i de o legisla葲ie na葲ional膬 pe m膬sur膬. Dac膬 vrem pres膬 liber膬, trebuie s膬 o protej膬m de abuz pentru ca ea s膬 dezv膬luie abuzuri 葯i s膬 apere interesul public.

听听V臎ra Jourov谩, Vice-President of the Commission. 鈥� Mr President, honourable Members, yes, it is true that since we started to work on this legislation, we heard about new and new cases. So just to react on Mr W枚lken and his comment that there seemed to be not many cases 鈥� now we have good data which show that this is a broad issue and dangerous trend which needs the legislative reaction. That is why I am glad that we are already in the advanced stage of negotiations on this legislation.

Indeed, Madame Strugariu, I promise this to the family of Daphne Caruana Galizia that we will legislate against the anti鈥擲LAPP cases, and so here we are. We have been seeing that the journalists face a multitude of challenges, and also human rights defenders. Our annual rule of law reports regularly identify issues that affect the freedom and pluralism of media in the EU and challenges to civil society, including rights defenders.

Journalists or rights defenders are still being targeted for doing their jobs, and this is not acceptable. More than that, I feel, I see that the justice system is abused, and as somebody who coordinates also justice policy in the EU, I have to repeat: this is unacceptable.

While it is mainly the responsibility of Member States to ensure that these key actors for democracy can do their work without constraints, we also have a duty to support the ecosystem at EU level. Over the past two years, the Commission has taken a number of initiatives to help improve the health of the media sector and of the rights defenders.

We have expanded our financial support in the area of media freedom and pluralism within the Creative Europe programme. We adopted a recommendation on the safety of journalists in September听2021. We proposed the Media Freedom Act in September听2022.

We adopted a report on the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights looking at the role of civil society, and we proposed in April听2022 a package to counter strategic lawsuits against public participation, so鈥攃alled SLAPPs, which is what we are discussing here today. I am very grateful for having such a discussion. We need to act to counter the SLAPP phenomenon and prevent it from growing.

Our objective is clear to protect journalists and other important civil society actors against abusive court proceedings because they should use their time and resources in order to be the watchdogs needed for the health of our democracies and not to fight abusive court proceedings. To do this, we need a strong system of safeguards and deterrents, and we need it sooner rather than later. Time is of the essence.

Speaking about time, I am beyond time. Can I have one more minute, Mr President? Thank you. I believe that this is an objective which is shared by the European 合法博彩网站, that we need to fight a growing phenomenon because it reaches levels of seriousness that endanger our democratic societies. I would like to thank the 合法博彩网站 for your efforts and for the swift progress made on this important file.

In particular, I welcome the fact that many of the adopted amendments in your report show a high level of agreement with our approach, including when it comes to important elements such as having a definition of cross鈥攂order cases and compensation for damages. 合法博彩网站 suggests several improvements which we look at positively and introduces two entirely new chapters which we look forward to discussing.

That said, in our view, it would be preferable to regulate questions of international jurisdiction and applicable law in the two general instruments that deal with these matters horizontally. It was already mentioned here the Brussels Ia and Rome II Regulations. The review process for both instruments is underway, and SLAPP鈥攕pecific considerations are very much part of that review.

I would also like to recall that the Commission鈥檚 anti鈥擲LAPP initiative is a comprehensive package. Our proposed directive provides cross鈥攂order civil procedure safeguards against SLAPPs, and in addition, we have also adopted, as you know, a horizontal recommendation which applies to all kinds of SLAPP cases, be they civil, criminal or administrative. It covers cross鈥攂order as well as domestic cases.

Some elements introduced by 合法博彩网站鈥檚 report are closely related to topics touched upon in the recommendation. We are open to consideration as to what the best policy mix is in relation to these elements.

听听Magdalena Adamowicz, w imieniu grupy PPE. 鈥� Pani Komisarz! Panie Przewodnicz膮cy! Demokracja, praworz膮dno艣膰 i sprawiedliwo艣膰 to stanie po stronie tych, kt贸rzy broni膮 prawdy, a przeciwko kt贸rym wymierzane s膮 pow贸dztwa typu SLAPP. Dost臋p do rzetelnych informacji, dost臋p do prawdy jest naszym podstawowym prawem, a naszym obowi膮zkiem jest chronienie tych, kt贸rzy do prawdy docieraj膮. Gdy nie bronimy tych, kt贸rzy walcz膮 o prawd臋, to pozwalamy, by prawd臋 zast臋powa艂o k艂amstwo. Gdy nie bronimy dost臋pu do prawdy, to pozwalamy odebra膰 sobie wolno艣膰. Pozwalamy, aby autorytaryzm zast膮pi艂 demokracj臋. Nasze warto艣ci musz膮 by膰 chronione naszym prawem. Temu ma s艂u偶y膰 dyrektywa przeciwko pow贸dztwom typu SLAPP, kt贸ra jest kluczowym, pierwszym krokiem w przeciwstawieniu si臋 tym, kt贸rzy knebluj膮 usta stoj膮cym na stra偶y prawdy i interesu spo艂ecznego. Nasze cele s膮 jasne.

Chcemy silnych 艣rodk贸w ochrony prawnej dla ofiar i dotkliwych kar odstraszaj膮cych dla inicjuj膮cych pow贸dztwa typu SLAPP. Bo naszym nadrz臋dnym celem jest, aby ofiary mia艂y pe艂ne wsparcie i pomoc pa艅stwa, a oprawcy 鈥� poczucie absolutnej nieuchronno艣ci kary. Chcemy jak najwcze艣niejszego oddalania bezpodstawnych pozw贸w, bo gdy sprawiedliwo艣膰 nadchodzi zbyt p贸藕no, trudno m贸wi膰 o jakiejkolwiek sprawiedliwo艣ci. Chcemy, by prawda nigdy nie by艂a kneblowana w imi臋 prawa do s膮du. Dla mnie wolno艣膰 od mowy nienawi艣ci powinna by膰 prawem cz艂owieka. Ale te偶 z pe艂n膮 moc膮 zawsze b臋d臋 powtarza艂a, 偶e ochrona przed mow膮 nienawi艣ci nie mo偶e by膰 argumentem do uciszania krytyki. I tylko niezawis艂y s膮d mo偶e by膰 miejscem, gdzie sp贸r o prawd臋 i granice wolno艣ci s艂owa jest rozstrzygany. Chcemy wreszcie, by prawo do prawdy nie by艂o tylko dla wybranych. Zagro偶eniem dla naszej wsp贸lnoty s膮 nie tylko pow贸dztwa typu SLAPP o wyra藕nym charakterze transgranicznym. Zaprzeczeniem fundament贸w Unii s膮 wszystkie SLAPP-y. Dlatego, podobnie jak w przypadku 艂amania praworz膮dno艣ci, tu te偶 musi obowi膮zywa膰 czytelna zasada: uciszanie demokracji w jednym kraju cz艂onkowskim jest uciszaniem demokracji w ca艂ej Unii.

听听Ib谩n Garc铆a Del Blanco, en nombre del Grupo S&D. 鈥� Se帽or presidente, la existencia de una democracia sana tiene como presupuesto la existencia, a su vez, de una opini贸n cr铆tica fuerte, de una opini贸n cr铆tica sana, libre. Y, para eso, es imprescindible que los poderes p煤blicos, que las instituciones pongamos medios para equilibrar la partida frente a quienes ejercen posiciones abusivas de poder, quienes tienen los suficientes medios econ贸micos o pol铆ticos para poder ejercer de manera abusiva esos mismos medios para, de alguna manera, cegar a la opini贸n p煤blica.

Y, en ese sentido, esta legislaci贸n anti demandas abusivas previene que haya una utilizaci贸n abusiva por parte de estos poderosos de demandas judiciales, de procedimientos que establecen cargas financieras, cargas econ贸micas insuperables para personas como activistas, como periodistas, como defensores de los derechos humanos, para aquellas personas que de alguna manera son la voz de nuestra conciencia, la conciencia de las democracias.

Y en ese sentido quiero dar las gracias a las personas que han trabajado en este expediente y, sobre todo, a mi compa帽ero Tiemo W枚lken, porque creo que a partir de hoy tenemos una democracia m谩s sana en la Uni贸n Europea. No solo es suficiente con esta norma; habr谩 muchas m谩s, tendremos que poner encima de la mesa muchas m谩s. Pero desde luego que a partir de hoy tenemos una democracia m谩s justa.

听听Ilana Cicurel, au nom du groupe Renew. 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, SLAPP! Cela sonne comme une claque et c鈥檈st ainsi que l鈥檕n d茅signe les 芦strategic lawsuit against public participation禄, ces actions-b芒illons, ces pratiques de harc猫lement judiciaire dont sont victimes journalistes, lanceurs d鈥檃lerte, universitaires qui se voient poursuivis de mani猫re acharn茅e par ceux qui veulent faire taire toute critique 脿 leur endroit.

Ce ph茅nom猫ne est suffisamment massif en Europe pour qu鈥檜ne directive soit sur le point d鈥櫭猼re vot茅e, inspir茅e par le remarquable travail de la coalition CASE. Ce texte est une avanc茅e majeure, mais une interpr茅tation trop restrictive de son champ d鈥檃pplication pourrait mettre en p茅ril son efficacit茅.

Comme parlementaires europ茅ens, nous portons haut trois exigences. La directive qui vise les proc猫s civils doit s鈥檃ppliquer au volet civil de l鈥檃ction p茅nale. Si elle ne s鈥檃pplique qu鈥檃ux litiges transfrontaliers, cette notion doit inclure les sujets d鈥檌nt茅r锚t public europ茅ens ou les propos accessibles depuis au moins deux pays europ茅ens. Enfin, et c鈥檈st essentiel, la directive doit offrir 脿 la victime de SLAPP une provision 脿 la charge du 芦slappeur禄 lui permettant de financer sa d茅fense.

听听Diana Riba i Giner, en nombre del Grupo Verts/ALE. 鈥� Se帽or presidente, se帽ora comisaria, la libertad de expresi贸n y de informaci贸n se ha deteriorado de forma alarmante en los 煤ltimos a帽os en Europa. El n煤mero de demandas mordaza impuestas en los Estados miembros ha incrementado gravemente. Tambi茅n lo han hecho los esc谩ndalos asociados al uso indiscriminado de programas esp铆a contra periodistas, opositores pol铆ticos y activistas. En pa铆ses como Polonia ya se han aprobado leyes de medios de comunicaci贸n que violan directamente el principio de la libertad de prensa.

Estamos en un contexto de avance de ideolog铆as reaccionarias y esto coincide con la negociaci贸n y aprobaci贸n a nivel europeo de esta legislaci贸n y de la Ley de Libertad de los Medios de Comunicaci贸n. Pese a que esta legislaci贸n no es tan ambiciosa como nuestro Grupo habr铆a querido, el texto que esta C谩mara aprobar谩 ma帽ana es un paso importante en la lucha para defender nuestros valores democr谩ticos fundamentales, y debemos evitar que su contenido se diluya en los di谩logos tripartitos.

La libertad de expresi贸n y el derecho a disentir no son meros privilegios, sino pilares esenciales de una sociedad vibrante y abierta.

听听Cristian Terhe艧, on behalf of the ECR Group. 鈥� Mr President, dear colleagues, we as elected officials must legislate ensuring a fair and just balance between three competing rights in regards to the press. The right of journalists to seek and expose the truth, the right of media consumers to know the truth and the right of good people to a good name and reputation. When the rights of any of these three participants are violated, the party should have access to a court where the case will be tried impartially.

The Anti-SLAPP Directive started with a good premise, but unfortunately failed to provide this fair and just balance of rights and obligations between the three parties involved in this process.

This directive asks the EU Member States to regulate in their national law the so-called early dismissal of a case when a journalist claims that the case is a SLAPP. This concept of early dismissal is specific to common law, not to the European continental legal system.

It is totally justified to impose at the end of the judicial process a severe fine against the person who is filing abusive court proceedings against a journalist, especially with the purpose to harass or to threaten the journalist. But to allow for an early dismissal of a case at the beginning of the judicial process, just because the journalist claims it is a SLAPP, without the judge to actually check the merits of the case, is going to generate a dangerous precedent, which will undermine the credibility of the press, as well as endanger the rights of any person to defend his or her rights of good reputation and image.

听听Gilles Lebreton, au nom du groupe ID. 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, chers coll猫gues, les poursuites-b芒illons sont des poursuites judiciaires dont le seul but est d鈥檌ntimider des journalistes ou des d茅fenseurs des droits de l鈥檋omme afin de les d茅courager et de les faire taire.

Quand elles ont un caract猫re transfrontalier, l鈥橴nion europ茅enne estime qu鈥檌l lui revient de les combattre. Au premier abord, l鈥檌ntention para卯t louable, car l鈥檕bjectif affich茅 est de prot茅ger la libert茅 d鈥檈xpression et de veiller 脿 ce qu鈥檜n d茅bat public reste possible. Mais trois constats montrent que l鈥檌ntervention de l鈥橴nion dans ce domaine n鈥檈st pas une bonne id茅e.

D鈥檃bord, le cercle des personnes 脿 prot茅ger a 茅t茅 exag茅r茅ment 茅tendu aux militants des ONG. Or je ne suis pas persuad茅 que les ONG soient aussi vuln茅rables que des journalistes. Qu鈥檕n songe par exemple 脿 celle du milliardaire George Soros. Ensuite, la d茅finition des affaires transfrontali猫res englobe les affaires dont le sujet est 鈥撎齤e cite le texte听鈥� 芦pertinent pour plus d鈥檜n 脡tat membre ou accessible en ligne禄, ce qui permet d鈥檈nglober n鈥檌mporte quelle affaire. Enfin, les pr茅tendues victimes pourront demander le rejet anticip茅 des poursuites les concernant et b茅n茅ficier ainsi d鈥檜n privil猫ge proc茅dural qui appara卯t choquant pour quiconque consid猫re que la justice doit respecter le principe d鈥櫭ゞalit茅.

Personnellement, je ne veux pas cautionner la mise en place d鈥檜ne justice 脿 deux vitesses. Pour toutes ces raisons, je refuse de soutenir ce projet.

听听Manon Aubry, au nom du groupe The Left. 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, la France a d鈥檌ncroyables talents et je vais vous en pr茅senter un. C鈥檈st notre maestro des proc茅dures-b芒illons. C鈥檈st un peu le Kylian Mbapp茅 des dribbles judiciaires. J鈥檃i nomm茅: Vincent Bollor茅.

Depuis des ann茅es, Bollor茅 envoie des bataillons d鈥檃vocats harceler tous les journalistes et militants qui d茅noncent la corruption, l鈥檈xploitation des travailleurs et les d茅sastres environnementaux de son empire industriel. Mediapart, France听Inter, Bastamag, Lib茅ration, Sherpa, React, ils en ont tous fait les frais. Bollor茅 perd la plupart de ses proc猫s, mais il s鈥檈n fout, car il ne cherche pas 脿 obtenir justice, mais 脿 la d茅tourner pour prot茅ger son impunit茅.

Malheureusement, ce n鈥檈st pas le seul harceleur judiciaire en Europe. Pour toutes ces raisons, je suis heureuse de participer, comme rapporteure pour la gauche, 脿 la n茅gociation de cette directive ambitieuse contre les proc茅dures-b芒illons. Au Conseil maintenant d鈥檃voir la m锚me ambition. Une justice au service des puissants, c鈥檈st n茅cessairement une injustice. Alors, adoptons cette directive et emp锚chons que les tribunaux soient d茅tourn茅s de leur mission par des harceleurs judiciaires. Je vous remercie.

听听Sabrina Pignedoli (NI). 鈥� Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, ora ci stiamo occupando di accuse strumentali per azzittire la stampa, pi霉 tardi si parler脿 della tutela internazionale dei giornalisti, due relazioni importantissime e necessarie.

Troppo spesso, tuttavia, nelle istituzioni europee ci riempiamo la bocca con libert脿 di stampa e Stato di diritto, senza passare dalle parole ai fatti.

Un esempio emblematico di cause giudiziarie mosse per azzittire o punire chi racconta la verit脿 猫 quella di Julian Assange, in carcere da quattro anni senza una sentenza di condanna solo perch茅 ha rivelato verit脿 scomode, crimini di guerra, detenzioni illegali e torture. Ma dai vertici delle istituzioni europee non 猫 arrivato nessun supporto, nessuna reale mobilitazione per la sua liberazione.

La libert脿 di stampa non pu貌 essere una bandierina da sventolare in televisione per autopromozione o solo quando 猫 utile per la propria carriera.

Difendere il diritto dei cittadini a sapere la verit脿 猫 un dovere delle istituzioni europee, soprattutto quando bisogna contrastare poteri forti. Dimostrate di averne il coraggio.

听听David Casa (PPE). 鈥� E偶att wara l-qtil ta鈥� Daphne Caruana Galizia, bank kriminali beda kampanja jhedded 摹urnalisti Maltin. Heddidhom bi pro膵eduri legali barra minn Malta g魔al miljuni kbar 鈥� pro膵eduri illi setg魔u jkrissruhom.

Kien f鈥檇ak il-mument li bdejna kampanja biex neliminaw dawn it-tattici abbu偶ivi illi ju偶ahom min ikollu l-poter u l-flus biex isikket il-摹urnalist u jevita l-iskrutinju pubbliku. U llum tant snin wara, il魔aqna dan l-istadju.

L-appell tieg魔i huwa wie魔ed 膵ar 鈥� ejja ma nitilfux din l-opportunit脿: opportunit脿 biex infixklu din it-theddida g魔ad-demokrazija, biex insa魔魔u t-trasparenza u biex nipprote摹u l-istampa 魔ielsa li hija tant importanti fis-so膵jet脿 tag魔na.

Kollegi fil-Kunsill: nispera li ma jdag魔jfux din il-li摹i, li摹i li tant tajjeb qieg魔da tissejja魔 Daphne鈥檚 Law. Kunu fuq in-na魔a ta膵-膵ittadini Ewropej minflok tg魔inu lil dawk li jridu i偶ommuhom fid-dlam.

Irrid nirringrazja lit-tim tal-Parlament b鈥檓od partikolari wkoll lill-Vi膵i President Jourov谩 illi ming魔ajrek ma konniex naslu s鈥檋awn. Ejja ni偶guraw li Daphne鈥檚 Law tkun il-vera denja ta鈥� isimha.

听听Sylvie Guillaume (S&D). 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, il y a quelques mois, alors que d茅butait l鈥檈xamen au Parlement de la proposition de directive, je me f茅licitais du chemin parcouru. Enfin, la Commission europ茅enne proposait un texte ambitieux, avec des mesures et des standards minimaux 脿 l鈥櫭ヽhelle de l鈥橴nion pour prot茅ger les victimes de ces proc茅dures abusives, ces proc茅dures-b芒illons qui visent 脿 garder sous silence des affaires qui m茅riteraient d鈥櫭猼re mises au jour dans le d茅bat public.

Ces atteintes aux libert茅s fondamentales, mais aussi 脿 l鈥櫭﹖at de droit, entravent les syst猫mes judiciaires et ont des cons茅quences dramatiques pour les victimes prises dans la tourmente. Elles constituent une menace sourde, en augmentation constante, 脿 l鈥檈ncontre des journalistes, des m茅dias, des ONG, pour ne citer que quelques cibles principales.

Malheureusement, entre-temps, le Conseil a adopt茅 sa position qui balaie ces efforts prometteurs. C鈥檈st pourquoi j鈥檈n appelle 脿 tous mes coll猫gues d茅put茅s d鈥檃dopter massivement la position constructive et ambitieuse du Parlement, de mani猫re 脿 peser de tout notre poids dans les discussions en trilogue. C鈥檈st seulement ce rapport de force qui prot茅gera les victimes de tentative d鈥檌ntimidation d茅l茅t猫re.

听听Irena Joveva (Renew). 鈥� Hvala, gospod predsedujo膷i. Novinarji, civilna dru啪ba, nevladne organizacije. To so tri skupine, ki so za zdravo, demokrati膷no dru啪bo neprecenljive. In to so tri skupine, ki so zaradi iskanja resnice in opozarjanja vladajo膷ih na nepravilnosti neprestano pod pritiskom strate拧kih to啪b. To je najbolj podel mehanizem represivnih politikov, mimogrede.

In zato me veseli, da direktiva vklju膷uje pravne varovalke za za拧膷ito 啪rtev. Da vpeljujemo mehanizem za zgodnje zavrnitve tak拧nih to啪b in da kon膷no pozivamo k zbiranju podatkov.

Ampak nikakor ne smemo pozabiti, da ta direktiva, 膷eprav je dobra zakonska osnova, varuje 啪rtve samo v primeru 膷ezmejnih sodb. Koliko je tak拧nih, zares 拧e ne vemo. Vemo pa, da je tak拧nih to啪b in sodb znotraj nekaterih dr啪av na stotine. In nanje, 啪al, ta direktiva o膷itno ne bo vplivala, 膷eprav bi prav tam na za膷etku omenjene tri skupine tak拧no za拧膷ito najbolj potrebovale.

Zato pozivam odgovorne in pristojne, naj najdejo re拧itev tudi zanje oziroma tudi tam. Ker mi v tej hi拧i - tisti, ki nam je zares mar - smo storili vse, kar smo lahko.

听听Saskia Bricmont (Verts/ALE). 鈥� En dix ans, plus de 570 proc茅dures en justice par des entit茅s publiques ou priv茅es ont vis茅 des lanceurs d鈥檃lerte, des journalistes, des d茅fenseurs des droits humains, de l鈥檈nvironnement, des ONG. Total听Energies accuse Greenpeace de diffuser des informations fausses. Socfin, membre du groupe Bollor茅, attaque des ONG qui l鈥檃ccusent d鈥櫭ヽoblanchiment et d鈥檃ccaparement de terres. 47听proc茅dures contre la seule journaliste Daphne Caruana Galizia avant son assassinat.

Le but syst茅matique: emp锚cher l鈥櫭﹎ergence de questions d鈥檌nt茅r锚t public, mettre fin aux enqu锚tes de journalistes ou faire taire l鈥檕pposition politique. Les effets: peines d鈥檈mprisonnement, lourdes sanctions financi猫res ou effet d鈥檃utocensure, dangereux pour nos d茅mocraties et le droit 脿 l鈥檌nformation de tous les citoyens.

La logique doit s鈥檌nverser. Les multinationales et les puissants de ce monde, dont les actions menacent l鈥檌nt茅r锚t public, doivent 锚tre sanctionn茅s. Celles et ceux qui d茅noncent leurs agissements doivent 锚tre prot茅g茅s tant par l鈥橴nion europ茅enne que par nos gouvernements.

听听Ern艖 Schaller-Baross (NI). 鈥� Eln枚k 脷r! Az eur贸pai baloldal 煤jra k铆v谩n 茅leszteni egy int茅zm茅nyt, ami nek眉nk, k枚z茅p-kelet eur贸pai 谩llampolg谩roknak oly ismer艖s: az oszt谩lyharc int茅zm茅ny茅t az 谩llamszocializmusb贸l. El茅rkezett az el艖jogokkal rendelkez艖 NGO-k ideje, akik els艖k az egyenl艖k k枚z枚tt. Az eur贸pai baloldal k茅pvisel艖i 煤gy hat谩roztak, hogy az NGO-kat, jogv茅d艖ket, emberjogi aktivist谩kat kiemelik a tag谩llami b铆r谩skod谩s al贸l, 茅s egy p茅ld谩tlan kiv谩lts谩gban r茅szes眉lnek: hogyha egy per k枚z茅leti r茅szv茅tel眉ket vesz茅lyezteti, az elj谩r谩st a b铆r贸s谩g azonnal megsz眉ntethetn茅.

Milyen alapon j谩r ez a kiv谩lts谩g az NGO-k r茅sz茅re? Milyen alapon k眉l枚nbek 艖k, mint a t谩rsadalom b谩rmely m谩s tagja? A v谩lasz egyszer疟, a ny铆lt t谩rsadalom 眉gy茅t k茅pviselik v谩laszt贸i felhatalmaz谩s n茅lk眉l. Tisztelt H枚lgyeim 茅s Uraim, a fentiek szellem茅ben hozott 铆t茅let soha nem lehet igazs谩gos. Ahol a jogszolg谩ltat谩s 茅s az igazs谩gszolg谩ltat谩s nem tartozik 枚ssze, az nem jog谩llam.

听听Isabel Wiseler-Lima (PPE). 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, quand la s茅curit茅 des journalistes n鈥檈st pas garantie, les citoyens ne peuvent plus compter sur une information libre et juste. Or, nous le savons, le journalisme d鈥檌nvestigation est un 茅l茅ment indispensable des d茅mocraties. Les journalistes doivent pouvoir travailler sereinement et sans autocensure. Cette libert茅 n鈥檈st pas donn茅e dans les pays totalitaires, mais elle n鈥檈st pas non plus donn茅e dans nos pays.

Quand les journalistes sont confront茅s aux poursuites abusives, au harc猫lement, aux intimidations, aux atteintes 脿 leur r茅putation, ces poursuites abusives ont pour seule fin d鈥櫭﹑uiser moralement et financi猫rement ceux qui se battent pour r茅v茅ler la v茅rit茅. Ceci n鈥檈st tout simplement pas acceptable.

Daphne Caruana Galizia avait donn茅 une d茅finition 茅clairante de ce qu鈥檈st une poursuite abusive. Je la cite: 芦les lois qui ont 茅t茅 con莽ues pour prot茅ger des personnes r茅ellement bless茅es sont utilis茅es comme un outil d鈥檃bus et d鈥檃gression par des personnes au pouvoir contre des personnes sans pouvoir禄.

La proposition de directive contre les poursuites abusives est un pas important. Elle donne les outils pour permettre 脿 la justice de poursuivre ceux qui abusent de nos lois et prot猫gent ainsi l鈥檈sprit de la loi. Nous devons nous donner tous les moyens n茅cessaires pour prot茅ger nos journalistes, tout comme les d茅fenseurs des droits de l鈥檋omme, et ainsi sauvegarder la d茅mocratie.

听听艁ukasz Kohut (S&D). 鈥� Panie Przewodnicz膮cy! Demokracja zawsze umiera w ciemno艣ci. Umiera tam, gdzie nie ma trudnych pyta艅 do w艂adzy, gdzie jest tylko propaganda rz膮du, gdzie nie ma wolnych medi贸w.

Bo wolno艣膰 s艂owa to nie tylko prawo do artyku艂owania swoich przekona艅. Wolno艣膰 s艂owa to dost臋p do uczciwych informacji, a nie do papki propagandowej.

W Polsce marze艅 Kaczy艅skiego nie ma niezale偶nych medi贸w. W niej obowi膮zuje doktryna Moczara: 鈥瀔to nie z Mieciem, tego zmieciem鈥�. Przyk艂ad贸w jest wiele: Lex TVN, ogromne kary na TOK FM, przej臋cie prasy lokalnej przez Obajtka, szykany dziennikarzy Wyborczej i Onetu pozwami czy te偶 ostatnia pr贸ba zmian personalnych w redakcjach Wirtualnej Polski i Onetu. I ci膮g艂a, nieko艅cz膮ca si臋 propaganda TVP rodem z Kremla, kt贸ra obrzydza Uni臋 Europejsk膮 i opozycj臋 24 godziny na dob臋. Czy to s膮 standardy europejskie?

Unia ju偶 raz zawiod艂a. Pozwoli艂a na zniszczenie niezale偶nych medi贸w na W臋grzech. Teraz czas dzia艂a膰 w obliczu ka偶dej pr贸by zniszczenia wolnych medi贸w w Polsce.

听听Hannah Neumann (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Mr听President, dear colleagues, Maltese journalist Daphne Caruana听Galizia had more than 40 SLAPP cases against her when she was killed; some were continued against her family. Nobel Peace Prize awardee Maria听Ressa is, until today, blocked from leaving the Philippines without prior court permission because of pending SLAPP cases against her. And the only goal of such strategic yet baseless lawsuits is to intimidate, harass and silence critical voices.

Because once you are faced with a SLAPP case, you need to read that file. You need to hire a lawyer, you need to appear in court, you need to fight related smear campaigns, sometimes even your bank accounts are being frozen. In addition, such SLAPP cases overburden already strained judicial systems and undermine trust in legal proceedings.

Dear colleagues, this is simply a perversion of rule of law. It is about time that we stand up and stop it in the EU and all around the world. So thank you, Tiemo, for your report. It is a good first step and let鈥檚 join forces to walk down that road even further.

听听Tatjana 沤danoka (NI). 鈥� Mr President, colleagues, the amendments as approved by JURI radically increases the demands to the court proceedings proposed by the Commission.

It is very important to enlarge by publishers, media organisations, whistleblowers, as well as civil society organisations, NGOs, trade unions, artists, researchers and academics the scope of those to be protected.

In the remaining seconds, I will not even be able to list the names of all those journalists, whistleblowers, researchers, NGO, activists in three Baltic states who are actually facing, in my opinion, strategic lawsuits against public participation. Juris Aleksejevs, Tatjana Andrijeca, Olegs Buraks, Aleksandrs Gaponenko, Aleksejus Grei膷ius, Vladimirs Lindermans, Algirdas Paleckis, Sergey Seredenko are facing criminal charges or already serving sentences as a result of unfounded lawsuits. The 14 journalists are under the court proceedings in Latvia just for publishing their articles in the 鈥榳rong鈥� media. The protection set up by the directive proposal gives hope to those who are at risk of such lawsuits.

听听Antonius Manders (PPE). 鈥揤oorzitter, commissaris, goed dat we maatregelen nemen om diegenen 鈥� journalisten in dit geval听鈥� te beschermen tegen oneigenlijk gebruik van procedures waardoor zij eigenlijk financieel kapot worden geprocedeerd en niet meer zijn wie ze zouden moeten zijn, namelijk mensen die zich bezighouden met het blootleggen van onrechtmatigheden in onze maatschappij.

Ik ben blij met de uitbreiding dat niet alleen journalisten beschermd gaan worden met deze maatregel, maar iedereen, elk individu dat het publieke doel dient. Want we zien steeds vaker dat het recht niet meer toegankelijk is voor iedereen, dat de kosten zo ontzettend hoog zijn dat individuen niet meer naar de rechter kunnen om hun gelijk te halen en dat ze dus accepteren dat hun onrecht wordt aangedaan.

Vroeger konden we terecht onder de lindeboom: de Germanen hadden rechtspraak onder de lindeboom, midden in het dorp. Daar waren geen kosten aan verbonden, maar er waren wel rechters die recht spraken. Ik hoop dat we hiermee de journalisten en iedereen die het publieke doel dient weer gaan beschermen om ervoor te zorgen dat we kunnen zien wat er fout gaat.

听听Katarina Barley (S&D). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, Frau Kommissarin! Demokratien leben von einer freien und unabh盲ngigen Presse. Sie leben von Menschen, die untersuchen, die aufdecken, die kritisch sind gegen眉ber ihren Regierungen. Genau das wollen Regierungen in undemokratischen Staaten nicht. Und auch manche Unternehmen versuchen, kritische Journalistinnen und Journalisten mundtot zu machen.

Wie machen sie das? Durch solche Klagen 鈥� SLAPPs. Das ist eigentlich eine Abk眉rzung: strategic lawsuit against public participation. Aber to slap hei脽t eben auch jemanden schlagen, jemandem eine runterhauen. Es hei脽t, Gewalt anzudrohen, Gewalt auszu眉ben, und das ist es, was diese Klagen tun. Denn sie kosten Zeit, sie kosten Geld, sie kosten Nerven, sie setzen unter Druck. Das ist genau das, was sie tun sollen.

Dagegen m眉ssen wir vorgehen. Denn wir sehen es gerade in L盲ndern, wo die Demokratie unter Druck steht: Gerade da brauchen wir diese freie Presse. Wir m眉ssen Journalistinnen und Journalisten sch眉tzen, aber auch Menschen, die sich in NGOs, in Verb盲nden engagieren, um Missst盲nde aufzudecken. Von diesen Menschen lebt unsere Demokratie. Lassen Sie uns diese Menschen sch眉tzen, und bitte tut das auch im Rat.

听听Marc Tarabella (NI). 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, nous devons prendre des mesures pour am茅liorer la protection des journalistes et des d茅fenseurs des droits humains contre les proc茅dures judiciaires abusives. Ces techniques d鈥檌ntimidation, qui 茅manent souvent d鈥檕rganisations ou de personnes puissantes, n鈥檕nt pour but que d鈥檈mp锚cher ces lanceurs d鈥檃lerte de s鈥檈xprimer et de les b芒illonner, afin d鈥櫭﹍iminer tout point de vue alternatif.

Il est important que ceux qui veillent sur les questions d鈥檌nt茅r锚t g茅n茅ral, qui sont garants du bon fonctionnement de l鈥櫭﹖at de droit, puissent jouir de leur droit fondamental 脿 la libert茅 d鈥檈xpression sans crainte de repr茅sailles.

脌 chaque fois que l鈥檕n s鈥檈n prend, pour ses id茅es ou son travail, 脿 un journaliste, 脿 un d茅fenseur des droits humains, 脿 un syndicat ou 脿 n鈥檌mporte quel lanceur d鈥檃lerte, on s鈥檈n prend aux fondements m锚mes de la d茅mocratie.

Spontane Wortmeldungen

听听Juan Fernando L贸pez Aguilar (S&D). 鈥� Se帽or presidente, 驴por qu茅 llevamos dos a帽os debatiendo sobre la necesidad de proteger a organizaciones no gubernamentales, periodistas, editores de prensa, activistas de derechos humanos o de medio ambiente contra procesos manifiestamente infundados o abusivos? Porque en toda Europa la libertad de expresi贸n y de comunicaci贸n est谩 retrocediendo.

Y este Parlamento Europeo, con el informe de nuestro compa帽ero Tiemo W枚lken, est谩 haciendo lo correcto obligando a los Estados miembros a adoptar legislaci贸n que permita rechazar inmediatamente, al no admitir a tr谩mite, o de manera r谩pida en un procedimiento, con todas las garant铆as, aquellas demandas manifiestamente infundadas que tengan el objetivo de intimidar o de reprimir la libertad de expresi贸n y de comunicaci贸n. Es la apuesta correcta en el momento correcto.

Y adem谩s es imprescindible que evitemos la b煤squeda de foros de conveniencia (forum shopping), es decir que, a la hora de interponer demandas abusivas o manifiestamente infundadas, adem谩s se elija la jurisdicci贸n m谩s represiva al servicio de aquellos gobiernos iliberales que est谩n retrocediendo en libertad de expresi贸n.

听听Clare Daly (The Left). 鈥� Mr President, I think it is really appropriate that we are talking about the protection of journalists from abuse of court proceedings. But I think we have to be honest about it that it doesn鈥檛 really get much more abusive than depriving somebody of their liberty.

In that sense, I think it was very appropriate for people to refer to journalists like Julian Assange, seven years in the Ecuadorian embassy, four years in a high security prison in Belmarsh in England, for having the audacity to hold US empire to account, outing the war crimes committed by the US in Iraq and Afghanistan. And while criminals who caused that war, like Bush and Blair, walk free, Julian Assange is currently awaiting judgment any day now, which could see him extradited to the US, where his life will be in grave danger.

What about Pablo Gonzalez? Basque journalist, 16 months in a Polish jail without a charge, extended pre鈥攖rial detention, not a single phone call with his family, limited visits. This is absolutely scandalous. If it was happening in Belarus and Iran, we鈥檇 be shouting and roaring about it. It is time to do something about these cases.

听听Cyrus Engerer (S&D). 鈥� Mr听President. We in the EU must champion journalists鈥� protection and the urgent need for the strongest laws against SLAPPs. Europe and all our Member States should always stand on the principles of freedom of the press and the right to express opposing views.

Colleagues, we must not allow the governments and the Council to weaken the Commission鈥檚 proposals. The rich and those with powerful interests must not be allowed to stifle journalists or silence activists. They all must be protected from the intimidation and the window鈥攕hopping of court proceedings.

I agree with the Commissioner: compensation for damages suffered by victims must be strong. And I thank Tiemo, my colleague, for this very strong report here in the European 合法博彩网站, because the brave journalists and activists risked their lives to shed light on the truth and we owe it to them to have the strongest benchmark laws possible here in the European Union.

听听Mick Wallace (The Left). 鈥� Mr President, freedom of the press, of association and freedom of expression are the cornerstones of any healthy political system. Some MEPs in here have said that journalists are afraid to report the truth and they鈥檙e right.

Pablo Gonzalez, a Basque journalist, is in prison for the last 16 months in Poland because the authorities didn鈥檛 like what he was saying. Algirdas Paleckis is in prison in Lithuania. His crime: he was considered pro-Russian. Julian Assange: five years in Belmarsh high鈥攕ecurity prison in London. For what? For telling the truth about US and NATO war crimes. What are we doing about saving him?

Meanwhile, most of our mainstream media in Europe have been bought by US empire, so most of our journalists are actually being paid not to speak the truth. They鈥檝e been bought. Our media in Europe is in serious trouble. Independent media is almost non-existent today.

(Ende der spontanen Wortmeldungen)

听听V臎ra Jourov谩, Vice-President of the Commission. 鈥� Mr听President, honourable Members, this report marks an important step towards the adoption of this directive, which is necessary to protect democracy and freedom of expression against abusive practices. And the Commission fully supports an ambitious planning in order to have in place as soon as possible an EU legal framework against SLAPP.

The Commission will do its utmost in the upcoming trilogue negotiations to facilitate convergence between the positions of the co鈥攍egislators on a robust final text that is fit for purpose and supports victims on the ground. And I will do what I always do in the trilogue to defend the position of the proposal of the Commission and to defend the strong definition of cross鈥攂order cases and also damages, because I think that this creates a big part of our proposal.

But I am looking forward to the negotiations. I think that we will have a good result not only in this directive, but also maybe in a period of time we will see that also the recommendation which we gave to the Member States to introduce the anti鈥擲LAPP measures also into domestic cases that we will see also for domestic cases some progress, because this is what I hear from the ministers.

What I always heard from the ministers was there are not so many cases, and second that we have to guarantee the equal access to justice for everyone, which was also mentioned here. I want to say that the SLAPPs are typical David versus Goliath battles. And I want to say that we, of course, recognise the right of even the rich and powerful people to go to the court and seek the fairness and justice. But at the same time, what we see at this moment is asymmetry in achieving justice and fairness. And what we are doing here is to correct this asymmetry.

And, a last comment, indeed, I wanted this law to be named Daphne鈥檚 Law, but our colleagues the legislators said that it would be too creative, maybe. But I think that we can give it this nickname and remember this very courageous lady.

听听Tiemo W枚lken, rapporteur. 鈥� Mr听President, thank you very much to Commissioner听Jourov谩 for her words. I hope we will have a successful trilogue. For that we have to really make sure that what we as 合法博彩网站 will adopt tomorrow will make it to the final text. Unfortunately, the Council鈥檚 position is a bit less ambitious, but today鈥檚 discussion here made for me very clear that we in the European 合法博彩网站 are united.

We will send tomorrow a strong signal to every journalist in the European Union that his work, that her work will be protected and we will not allow in the future that they will be threatened with illegal, unfounded lawsuits. We will stand at their side. We will make sure that media freedom in the European Union prevails. And for that, we need a strong mandate. And I am very, very confident that we will get this strong mandate tomorrow from what I heard today. So, thank you very much to everyone who participated in this debate today.

I will not come to an end without thanking all the colleagues who worked with me on this draft, on this report. So, thank you very much to all the shadows and also to the opinion鈥攇iving committees, because their insights have been very helpful for the final report.

Dear colleagues, let me finish by underlining that we in the European 合法博彩网站 will always defend media freedom, press freedom. We will stand at the sides of the ones under pressure and together we will protect them. And we will make sure that Daphne Caruana听Galizia鈥檚 case, who was mentioned very often today, will not repeat in the European Union. Thank you very much. Let鈥檚 have a vote tomorrow which sends a very strong signal to the Council. We will not give up. We will fight for better protection for our journalists in the European Union.

听听Der Pr盲sident. 鈥� Die Aussprache ist geschlossen.

Die Abstimmung findet am Dienstag, 11.听Juli 2023, statt.

听听Der Pr盲sident. 鈥� Als n盲chster Punkt der Tagesordnung folgt die Aussprache 眉ber die Europ盲ische B眉rgerinitiative 鈥濬眉r den Schutz kosmetischer Mittel ohne Tierqu盲lerei und ein Europa ohne Tierversuche鈥� ().

听听Maria Spyraki, on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. 鈥� Mr President, Commissioner Jourov谩, the 鈥楽ave Cruelty鈥擣ree Cosmetics 鈥� Commit to a Europe without animal testing鈥� European Citizens鈥� Initiative has gained more than one听million signatures from at least seven Member States, and its organisers presented this case in a hearing before the ENVI Committee on 25听May, and you were present, Madam Commissioner.

Members of the initiative expressed strong concerns that, despite the existing legislation banning animal testing for cosmetics, in vivo testing is on the rise. The initiative calls on the Commission to protect and strengthen the cosmetic animal testing ban and initiate a legislative change for all cosmetic ingredients without resorting to animal testing, also to transform the EU chemical legislation, in particular REACH, by managing chemicals without the addition of new animal testing requirements.

Third, to modernise science in the EU by setting the scheme with a new legislative proposal in order to plot a roadmap to phase out all animal testing in the EU before the end of the current legislative term.

While most colleagues in the ENVI Committee supported the initiative, there are concerns focused on the issue of visibility and reliability of the alternatives, particularly with regards to health and pharmaceuticals. The need for more research, of course, before completely phasing out of practice is undeniable, according to my opinion.

It is important for us in ENVI to ensure full implementation of existing legislation and to propose new initiatives to promote alternatives to animal testing. We have to increase the uptake and implementation of non鈥攁nimal methods and also to overcome the default reliance on animal testing, particularly in light of the revision of [inaudible], which is in the pipeline, and also on REACH. We also need to ensure a consistent approach on the question of broadening the scope of the ban of non鈥擡U countries.

The Commission has also to do her job to accelerate the transition to non鈥攁nimal testing by developing the guidelines in cooperation with the OECD and to consider alternative methods in upcoming initiatives. Increased cooperation and investments in the use of innovative technologies in [inaudible] origin is needed.

Dear colleagues, the current strategy is not sufficiently and effectively implemented. We need a holistic approach for phasing out animal testing. We also are convinced that animal testing would be phased out in due time, recognising the current limitations, particularly to the pharma sector, for important and rare disease.

听听Mazaly Aguilar, en nombre de la Comisi贸n de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. 鈥� Se帽or presidente, esta iniciativa, que parte de un gran n煤mero de ciudadanos de los diferentes Estados, est谩 pidiendo a la Comisi贸n proteger y reforzar la prohibici贸n de la experimentaci贸n con animales para la industria de cosm茅ticos, pero tambi茅n est谩 pidiendo modernizar la ciencia de la Uni贸n Europea, eliminando progresivamente todos los ensayos con animales antes de que finalice la actual legislatura.

Desde una perspectiva cient铆fica, sobre todo en lo relacionado con las enfermedades cerebrales y, en concreto, con la enfermedad de Parkinson, una prohibici贸n total del uso de animales en la investigaci贸n biom茅dica ser铆a un error. Aunque se han logrado avances considerables utilizando alternativas a estos ensayos, la mayor parte de lo que puede aprenderse sobre el cerebro y su comportamiento sigue dependiendo directa o indirectamente de la investigaci贸n en modelos animales.

La eliminaci贸n, aunque sea progresiva, del uso de animales en la investigaci贸n m茅dica tendr铆a consecuencias negativas muy importantes y afectar铆a a los avances en la mejora de la calidad de vida de los muchos enfermos de estas afecciones cerebrales y neurol贸gicas. Tenemos que garantizar que la prohibici贸n de experimentaci贸n con animales para cosm茅ticos no se extienda a la investigaci贸n m茅dica.

听听Ana Miranda, en nombre de la Comisi贸n de Peticiones. 鈥� Se帽or presidente, se帽ora comisaria, en nombre de la Comisi贸n de Peticiones del Parlamento Europeo quisiera aprovechar esta oportunidad para felicitar a los organizadores por su buen trabajo y por haber recaudado el apoyo de 1,2 millones de europeos y europeas comprometidos por eliminar los ensayos con animales en la UE antes del final de la actual legislatura. La herramienta ICE (Iniciativa Ciudadana Europea) vuelve a dar visibilidad a las iniciativas ciudadanas promoviendo la democracia participativa.

Si bien el fomento formal de los m茅todos de ensayos en animales es exclusivo de la UE, existen obst谩culos burocr谩ticos para su aceptaci贸n. Su uso no se aplica adecuadamente y la financiaci贸n para su desarrollo est谩 siendo insuficiente. Algunos Estados miembros han adoptado medidas nacionales de ejecuci贸n que garantizan un elevado nivel de protecci贸n de los animales utilizados con fines cient铆ficos, mientras que otros solo aplican los requisitos m铆nimos.

A pesar de los avances logrados gracias a los ensayos con animales en el desarrollo de tratamientos m茅dicos y vacunas, incluyendo las vacunas contra la COVID-19, los ciudadanos europeos apoyan la prohibici贸n total y global del uso de animales en investigaci贸n. Es necesario reemplazar los ensayos con animales por m茅todos alternativos avanzados para cumplir con los objetivos sanitarios medioambientales establecidos en los distintos planes europeos.

Para lograr el objetivo de la Directiva 2010/63/UE, es crucial mejorar la coordinaci贸n entre los Estados miembros y las partes interesadas para desarrollar un plan de acci贸n a nivel de la UE que promueva la reducci贸n, el perfeccionamiento y la sustituci贸n de los procedimientos con animales vivos. Esto debe hacerse sin comprometer la protecci贸n de la salud humana y el medio ambiente, ni poner en riesgo la soberan铆a tecnol贸gica de la UE.

Es necesario fortalecer tambi茅n el Espacio Europeo de Investigaci贸n y basar el plan en la investigaci贸n realizada en la UE hasta ahora. Tambi茅n son necesarios mecanismos de financiamiento preferencial para los m茅todos sin animales en todas las iniciativas de investigaci贸n.

Las instituciones acad茅micas tienen un papel esencial y deben promover alternativas a los ensayos con animales, difundiendo nuevos conocimientos y pr谩cticas. Debe priorizarse la educaci贸n y capacitaci贸n de cient铆ficos.

Hay muchos elementos que analizar y estoy segura de que la presentaci贸n de hoy ser谩 muy 煤til y constructiva.

Puhetta johti HEIDI HAUTALA
varapuhemies

听听V臎ra Jourov谩, Vice-President of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, honourable Members of 合法博彩网站, thank you for the invitation to come and speak on behalf of the European Commission at this plenary debate on the initiative 鈥楽ave cruelty鈥攆ree cosmetics 鈥� Commit to a Europe without animal testing鈥�.

First of all, I would like to thank the European 合法博彩网站 for having organised a successful public hearing on 25听May, and on this occasion I also want to congratulate again the organisers for collecting 1.2 million signatures in record time. We heard from them their arguments. We listened very carefully. The organisers had a chance to present their initiative and the different Members to express their views also, and today鈥檚 plenary debate gives me and my colleagues preparing the Commission official reply another opportunity to listen carefully to the contributions and interventions from various Members.

This initiative reminds us that animal welfare is a significant concern for European citizens and a longstanding principle in European legislation. It requests to strengthen the animal testing ban under the Cosmetics Regulation. It then addresses all legislation requiring animal testing for chemical safety assessments, REACH legislation on plant protection products, biocides, pharmaceuticals and others. Lastly, it extends to basic and applied research, including biomedical research, training and education. On the first issue, related to cosmetics, it is important to note that the Cosmetics Regulation already bans animal testing for cosmetics products and ingredients for the safety assessment requirements of that regulation. However, other legislation may still require animal testing, for instance to assess hazards to workers鈥� health or the environment.

Regarding chemical safety assessments under different legislation, I would like to underline that already today animal testing is allowed only as a last resort. However, as experts of agencies like the European Chemicals Agency or Member State authorities confirm, we are not yet able to fully identify all hazards to health and the environment without some animal testing.

The good news is that we have seen significant progress in the development of non-animal methods in recent years. The workshop on new approach methodologies that the European Chemicals Agency organised with the Commission and stakeholders in June undoubtedly showed that the funding of research for alternatives to animal testing is highlighted in the initiative. I want to emphasise that the Commission already actively supports the development of such methods through research funding. Over the past two decades, the European Union has allocated over EUR听1 billion to more than 300 research projects.

Today鈥檚 exchange of views will feed into our reflection. We will present our general conclusions, as well as the actions that we intend to take in response to the three objectives of this initiative, in our communication later this month. I wish you a fruitful discussion.

听听Marlene Mortler, im Namen der PPE-Fraktion. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, Kollegen! Wir haben viel zu lange geschwiegen. Wir haben zu wenig 枚ffentlich informiert: Auch wenn wir Tierversuche in Europa einstellen听鈥� auch wenn sie noch notwendig sind听鈥� diese Forschung wird deshalb nicht aufh枚ren. Dann findet sie eben au脽erhalb Europas statt, zu schlechteren Bedingungen, zu niedrigeren Standards, und diese f眉hren wiederum zu weiteren Abh盲ngigkeiten von Drittstaaten 鈥� so Spitzenwissenschaftler letzte Woche in Br眉ssel.

Gott sei Dank sind nur 4听% der Versuche f眉r die Tiere schwer belastend. Doch alle Erkenntnisse kommen den Menschen oder den Patienten zugute. Aber auch Chemikalien wie L枚sungsmittel, Weichmacher, Konservierungsstoffe sowie Industriechemikalien m眉ssen auf ihre Giftigkeit getestet werden, bevor Menschen damit in Kontakt kommen.

Replace, reduce, refine: Die REACH-Verordnung verlangt die Pr眉fung tausender Stoffe. Sie sagt aber ausdr眉cklich, dass die Tierversuche auf ein notwendiges Minimum eingeschr盲nkt werden. Doch Computer-Modellierungen k枚nnen Grundlagenforschung noch nicht ersetzen, und Organoide nicht den gesamten menschlichen K枚rper mit seinem komplexen Zellsystem. Ich will jedenfalls nicht, dass wir unsere Probleme in andere Kulturkreise verlegen und dort statt an Tieren an Menschen getestet wird, die auf Geld angewiesen sind.

听听Niels Fuglsang, on behalf of the S&D Group. 鈥� Madam President, dear colleagues, dear Commissioner, today we stand on the shoulders of more than 1.4 million European citizens who have signed the Citizens鈥� Initiative and demand that we treat animals in a more respectful and a more decent way.

There is a broad consensus, even among politicians, that animals are sentient beings. Unfortunately, the current legislation does not reflect that obvious fact. The use of animals in cosmetics and in other chemical tests is an example of just that. Even though 鈥� as the Commissioner states 鈥� we have explicit legislation saying that we cannot use animals, banning animal tests when we talk about cosmetics, we still see it happening today.

According to the Commission鈥檚 own research, we have the number of animals being used for scientific purposes stagnating at 7.4 million animals per year. That鈥檚 not good enough. We need to use the alternatives. They exist. Therefore, I would like to ask the Commissioner: can we expect that the Commission finally commits to a coordinated plan to accelerate the transition to non鈥攁nimal science?

听听Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, en nombre del Grupo Renew. 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, se帽ora comisaria, quiero expresar en este turno mi rotunda oposici贸n al contenido de esta iniciativa y abogar por contestarla desde la transparencia y los criterios con los que trabajan los profesionales de la ciencia.

Desde hace a帽os, la Asociaci贸n Europea para la Investigaci贸n Animal promueve y cumple a rajatabla las normas de bienestar aplicables a los animales de laboratorio. Practica, adem谩s, el c贸digo de las tres erres: reemplazo, reducci贸n y refinamiento de los procedimientos, fomentando el uso de m茅todos alternativos.

驴Qu茅 hacer cuando no hay otra opci贸n? Escuchemos iniciativas como 芦Compromiso por la ciencia禄, impulsada por el Consejo Europeo del Cerebro, que nos pide apoyo para la investigaci贸n sobre las enfermedades neurodegenerativas y psiqui谩tricas. Recordemos, con la comunidad cient铆fica, que la experimentaci贸n con animales de laboratorio ha salvado y seguir谩 salvando vidas; entre ellas, sin ninguna duda, las de personas que, con su mejor voluntad, han podido firmar o apoyar铆an esta iniciativa ciudadana sobre el uso de animales para la ciencia.

听听Tilly Metz, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group. 鈥� Madam President, dear Commissioner, 10 years ago, the European Union took the decision to completely ban animal testing for cosmetic products and ingredients, becoming the first market in the world to do so. It might feel like a symbolic move or even an unimportant issue to some, but for me 鈥� as a European who deeply cares for animals 鈥� it was a proud and happy moment.

This will be one area where European consumers could buy products in good conscience because they didn鈥檛 have to worry if animals had suffered in labs. But then they discovered that this is not the case at all, as animal tests still are performed for workers鈥� safety. This is a legal inconsistency that is also causing damage to the credibility of the Union and to the trust of our citizens.

Alternative testing methods exist and continue to be developed, and we should support them more. So I wait for the Commission that the announced roadmap is really among the answers that we will give on this ECI, and that we have a concrete step to phase out animal testing.

听听El偶bieta Kruk, w imieniu grupy ECR. 鈥� Pani Przewodnicz膮ca! Blisko 1,5 miliona os贸b podpisa艂o europejsk膮 inicjatyw臋 obywatelsk膮 maj膮c膮 na celu zako艅czenie nie tylko okrutnego wykorzystywania zwierz膮t w testach kosmetycznych i chemicznych, lecz tak偶e wszelkich eksperyment贸w na zwierz臋tach. 呕adna inna europejska inicjatywa obywatelska nie otrzyma艂a takiego wsparcia w tak wielu krajach. Popierana jest r贸wnie偶 przez naukowc贸w i przemys艂. Oficjalnie w Europie nie prowadzi si臋 test贸w kosmetyk贸w na zwierz臋tach, to jednak nie ca艂a prawda. Rocznie ponad 10 milion贸w zwierz膮t cierpi podczas eksperyment贸w prowadzonych w unijnych laboratoriach. Wiele sk艂adnik贸w kosmetyk贸w to bowiem chemikalia, kt贸re podlegaj膮 innej regulacji zobowi膮zuj膮cej do prowadzenia test贸w na zwierz臋tach.

Tymczasem dzi艣 mo偶na ju偶 bezpiecznie obej艣膰 si臋 bez zadawania cierpie艅 zwierz臋tom. Nowoczesne, alternatywne metody sprawdzania kosmetyk贸w s膮 efektywniejsze ni偶 przestarza艂e i okrutne do艣wiadczenia na zwierz臋tach. Wesprzyjmy obywatelskie postulaty wzywaj膮ce Komisj臋 do zmiany przepis贸w i przedstawienia planu stopniowego wycofywania si臋 ze wszelkich eksperyment贸w na zwierz臋tach, wspierania rozwoju i wdra偶ania nowych technologii, w tym przekierowania finansowania z bada艅 na zwierz臋tach na metody alternatywne. Po艂贸偶my kres cierpieniu milion贸w zwierz膮t w europejskich laboratoriach.

听听Annika Bruna, au nom du groupe ID. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, les exp茅riences sur les animaux pour tester des cosm茅tiques sont interdites depuis听2013. Mais en听2020, la Commission, dans les affaires Symrise, a contraint les industriels 脿 tester les composants cosm茅tiques sur les animaux en invoquant le r猫glement REACH. Il nous faut donc sortir de l鈥檕rni猫re.

J鈥檃i d茅j脿 eu l鈥檕ccasion de pr茅senter des solutions 脿 la Commission, parmi lesquelles la possibilit茅 pour l鈥橝gence europ茅enne des produits chimiques d鈥檋omologuer elle-m锚me des m茅thodes alternatives aux tests sur les animaux, avec effet imm茅diat. La possibilit茅 茅galement pour le Laboratoire europ茅en pour les alternatives 脿 l鈥檈xp茅rimentation animale d鈥檋omologuer ses m茅thodes, l脿 encore avec un effet imm茅diat.

Je me suis rendue mardi dernier dans ce laboratoire qui est situ茅 en Italie, 脿 Ispra. Ces m茅thodes sont nombreuses 鈥撎齮oxico-g茅nomiques, organes sur puce et mod猫les de peau reconstitu茅e, bioimpression, mod茅lisation informatique ou encore simulation de m茅canismes neurologiques.

Aujourd鈥檋ui, la science avance plus vite que le droit. Les m茅thodes alternatives se d茅veloppent et sont reconnues comme fiables. Ce qui emp锚che de remplacer les tests sur les animaux, c鈥檈st l鈥檌nertie du droit et, il faut bien le reconna卯tre, l鈥檌nertie de la Commission europ茅enne. Plus d鈥檜n million de citoyens ont les yeux riv茅s sur vous et attendent des r茅ponses. Vous ne pouvez les ignorer.

听听Sun膷ana Glavak (PPE). 鈥� Po拧tovana predsjedavaju膰a, po拧tovana povjerenice, kolegice i kolege, o膷ito je da testiranje kozmetike na 啪ivotinjama jest praksa koja izaziva zabrinutost me膽u gra膽anima diljem Europske unije. Osu膽ujemo, naravno, patnju i okrutnost koju 啪ivotinje podnose u ime ljepote i sigurnosti proizvoda.

Prema podacima organizacije Prijatelji 啪ivotinja, 膷uli smo razli膷ite podatke i brojke danas, me膽utim, ovo je ne拧to najsvje啪ije, svake godine otprilike 35 tisu膰a 啪ivotinja u Europi te milijuni 拧irom svijeta izlo啪eni su patnji zbog testiranja. Govorimo o kozmeti膷kim proizvodima ili njihovim sastojcima. Praksa je to koja nije samo okrutna, ve膰 je, vi拧e smo puta 膷uli ovdje, i zastarjela.

Postoje brojne alternative koje su dostupne i koje su napredovale u posljednjim desetlje膰ima. Napredak znanosti i tehnologije omogu膰uje nam razvoj sofisticiranih in vitro metoda, organskih modela, ra膷unalnih simulacija koje su pouzdane, relevantne, a 拧to je najbitnije, i eti膷ne.

Europska unija ve膰 ima naprednu regulativu koja zabranjuje testiranje kozmeti膷kih sastojaka na 啪ivotinjama. Me膽utim, moramo i膰i dalje i pozivam stoga i Komisiju da napravi iskorak u tom smjeru prema gotovim kozmeti膷kim proizvodima koji se stavljaju na tr啪i拧te. Budimo predvodnici onih eti膷kih standarda o kojima toliko govorimo i poticanja industrije da razvije odr啪ive alternative za testiranje.

Ova inicijativa vrijedna je, predstavlja korak naprijed prema eti膷koj odr啪ivoj budu膰nosti i stoga je na nama da stvorimo Europu koja 拧titi 啪ivotinje i to upravo ja膷anjem i promicanjem inovacija, a u tom smjeru i拧li smo 膷etiri godine za vrijeme ove Komisije i ovog saziva parlamenta. Imamo novaca, imamo resurse, u膷inimo to.

听听Beatrice Covassi (S&D). 鈥� Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, sembra incredibile che ancora oggi nel 2023 dobbiamo discutere in questo Parlamento dell'utilizzo di animali come cavie per prodotti cosmetici, quando, gi脿 negli anni '90, venivano lanciate le prime linee non testate su animali.

L'Unione europea 猫 all'avanguardia: tra il 2004 e il 2013 abbiamo messo al bando i test sugli animali per i prodotti cosmetici e i loro ingredienti; nel 2007 abbiamo incluso nei trattati il principio del benessere degli animali. Questo mentre nel mondo l'80听% dei paesi non ha ancora normative in merito.

Eppure le nostre regole di fatto vengono eluse perch茅 i cosmetici contengono anche ingredienti che ricadono sotto altre normative e vengono ancora testati su animali.

Oggi l'innovazione tecnologica ci permette gi脿 di testare in modo sicuro senza che nessun essere vivente debba soffrirne.

Da qui la lodevole iniziativa dei cittadini europei che discutiamo oggi, con oltre un milione e duecentomila firme e che lancia un fondato allarme.

Allora, cari colleghi, niente timidezze: abbracciamo una volta e per sempre un concetto di bellezza pi霉 profondo, dove il rispetto di ogni forma di vita possa essere terapeutico e trasformativo non solo dei nostri corpi, ma anche della nostra anima.

La nostra Europa sar脿 bella e grande nella misura in cui sapr脿 essere sempre pi霉 dalla parte del rispetto della natura, degli ecosistemi, degli esseri viventi.

Pyynn枚st盲 my枚nnett盲v盲t puheenvuorot

听听Stanislav Pol膷谩k (PPE). 鈥� Pan铆 p艡edsedaj铆c铆, opravdu ohromuj铆c铆 po膷et ob膷an暖 n谩s vyz媒v谩 k tomu, abychom zakro膷ili proti testov谩n铆 na zv铆艡atech. M谩me samoz艡ejm臎 ke zv铆艡at暖m jako 啪iv媒m tvor暖m projevovat respekt a 煤ctu.

J谩 se p艡ipojuji k t臎mto ob膷an暖m. Je nepochybn茅, 啪e zde m谩me dvoj铆 legislativu, jednu, kter谩 zakazuje toto testov谩n铆, a druhou, kter谩 艡铆k谩, 啪e pro chemik谩lie mus铆 povinn臎 doj铆t k tomu testov谩n铆 na zv铆艡eti. Mysl铆m si, 啪e je to takov谩 z谩konn谩 forma obch谩zen铆, a bohu啪el mnoz铆 producenti farmaceutick茅ho pr暖myslu tuto v媒jimku vyu啪铆vaj铆 velmi 膷asto.

Se z谩jmem jsem si poslechl vystoupen铆 pan铆 komisa艡ky. Jsem velmi r谩d, 啪e upozornila na ty alternativn铆 metody a dokonce jejich mo啪nosti financov谩n铆 v媒zkumu, kter茅 jsou k dispozici. Poj膹me b媒t skute膷n臎 d暖sledn臎j拧铆. Zvy拧me sankce za pr谩v臎 to obch谩zen铆 z谩kona. Mo啪n谩, 啪e dokonce zp艡铆sn臎me tu legislativu. To je, mysl铆m, jednozna膷n茅. A m臎li bychom skute膷n臎 zak谩zat n臎kterou kosmetiku na trhu, kter谩 nedodr啪铆 tato stanoven谩 pravidla.

听听Caroline Roose (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, le r猫glement cosm茅tique de听2009 interdit des exp茅rimentations animales sur les produits cosm茅tiques et sur leurs ingr茅dients. Il interdit aussi la mise sur le march茅 de produits qui avaient 茅t茅 test茅s ou dont les ingr茅dients avaient 茅t茅 test茅s sur des animaux. Pourtant, l鈥橝gence europ茅enne des produits chimiques continue d鈥檈xiger de certains fabricants qu鈥檌ls recourent 脿 des tests sur les animaux. Rien aujourd鈥檋ui ne peut justifier que des tests sur les animaux soient pratiqu茅s pour des cosm茅tiques.

Cela fait des ann茅es que les fabricants et les associations de protection des animaux alertent sur ce scandale. Aujourd鈥檋ui, gr芒ce 脿 la mobilisation des dizaines d鈥檃ssociations et plus d鈥檜n million de signatures de citoyennes et citoyens europ茅ens, nous en discutons enfin! Merci 脿 eux.

L鈥檌nitiative citoyenne europ茅enne nous invite aussi 脿 nous poser plus globalement la question des tests sur les animaux. Les alternatives existent. Elles sont m锚me souvent plus fiables que les tests sur les animaux. Pourtant, les tests sur les animaux diminuent 脿 peine. Nous avons besoin d鈥檜n plan d鈥檃ction complet qui m锚le formation des professionnels, financements publics et r茅glementation pour r茅duire significativement les tests sur les animaux.

听听Mick Wallace (The Left). 鈥� Madam President, firstly, to debunk one of the key myths about this European Citizens鈥� Initiative, there have been claims that this proposal will be harmful and limiting to medical research with an outright ban on animal testing, which is untrue. Despite the ban on animal testing on cosmetic products it is an ongoing practice with certain ingredients that require testing by the European Chemicals Agency.

This initiative outlines a clear consumer demand to reduce mandatory chemical testing, with a proposal to transform and innovate EU chemicals regulation to ensure that human health and the environment are protected by managing chemicals without the barrier of new animal testing requirements, as outlined in a report by the European Environment Bureau.

This needs to be achieved through REACH regulation, which is responsible for testing requirements. So the revision of REACH legislation is crucial. But when will it happen? The Commission has been promising this for a while.

听听Clare Daly (The Left). 鈥� Madam President, I know we heard from the Commissioner that the Commission is listening. But if you are, I wonder, are you really hearing? Because we know that the Commission and the European Chemicals Agency are still standing over animal testing under the REACH Regulation for chemicals used exclusively in cosmetics, for which there is a possibility of workforce exposure or a risk to the environment.

Now, this is a double standard and a joke. As colleagues have said, the European Union lauded the fact that we became a world leader 10听years ago in banning cosmetics products being tested on animals. It is time for us to stop the double standards now. It is beyond time for us to respect the demand of the 1.2 million citizens who are demanding a legally binding act to end animal testing for cosmetic products and ingredients under REACH, including the safety of workers, and to put an end to the serious legal inconsistency that has been going on over the past period.

As colleagues have said, there are alternatives. We need to commit to a Europe without animal testing, and I really hope that the Commission comes up with a roadmap for that.

(Pyynn枚st盲 my枚nnett盲v盲t puheenvuorot p盲盲ttyv盲t)

听听V臎ra Jourov谩, Vice-President of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, honourable Members, let me thank you for this rich debate with interesting perspectives and well considered statements from the different speakers. Your views on the different aspects of the Citizens鈥� Initiative bring useful insights that we will take into account when finalising our response to the initiative.

So I can confirm I was not only listening; I also heard you. For us policy-makers, the support of citizens for a policy direction is key. This initiative reminds us how animal welfare remains a strong concern for European citizens, and we take that call very seriously. And not only this initiative 鈥� we had several initiatives in a row which concerned animals.

Coming back to this one, we are now in the final stage of the European Citizens鈥� Initiative cycle, which is to finalise the Commission鈥檚 formal answer to the initiative, covering our general conclusions as well as any action we may intend to take to follow up. This debate is timely because the College will have to adopt the communication by 25听July, so very soon.

This will be the second initiative replied to this month, as the Commission adopted last week its reply to another initiative concerning animal welfare, which aims at ending the trade of loose shark fins 鈥� a horrible practice, barbaric. I think that it鈥檚 high time we react.

Before concluding, I am also glad to share with you that the Commission is currently examining one other successful initiative 鈥� Fur-Free Europe 鈥� to which the Commission will reply before the end of this year.

Citizens鈥� engagement in the EU is growing ever stronger and I hope that it will also be reflected in the next elections. Demonstrating that we take seriously their concerns and clearly explaining our decisions will be essential for their trust in the EU and their continued involvement. That is why I am always repeating that I admire the initiatives and the efforts of the organisers, because this is really a very important contribution to our work. Thank you again for this fruitful debate.

听听Puhemies. 鈥� Keskustelu on p盲盲ttynyt.

听听Puhemies. 鈥� Esityslistalla on seuraavana Jo茫o Pimenta Lopesin kalatalousvaliokunnan puolesta laatima mietint枚 ehdotuksesta Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetukseksi Etel盲isen Intian valtameren kalastussopimuksen (SIOFA) soveltamisalaan kuuluvalla alueella sovellettavista hoito-, s盲ilytt盲mis- ja valvontatoimenpiteist盲 ( - C9-0370/2022 - ) (A9-0192/2023).

听听Jo茫o Pimenta Lopes, relator. 鈥� Senhora Presidente, Senhora Comiss谩ria, Caros Relatores-Sombra, noto, mais uma vez que, num debate sobre quest玫es relacionadas com a pesca, o comiss谩rio respons谩vel n茫o est谩 presente.

A proposta em apre莽o visa incorporar no Direito da Uni茫o Europeia as medidas de conserva莽茫o, de gest茫o e de controlo adotadas no 芒mbito do Acordo de Pesca para o Oceano 脥ndico Sul (SIOFA 藯 a Organiza莽茫o Regional de Gest茫o das Pescas, respons谩vel pela gest茫o dos recursos hali锚uticos na sua zona de aplica莽茫o).

As medidas de conserva莽茫o e de gest茫o adotadas pela SIOFA s茫o vinculativas para a Uni茫o Europeia enquanto parte contratante. A proposta da Comiss茫o, agora em apre莽o, visa transpor as recomenda莽玫es definidas pela SIOFA desde 2016. Passaram j谩 sete anos desde a decis茫o sobre tais recomenda莽玫es.

A proposta da Comiss茫o vai al茅m de v谩rios requisitos das medidas de conserva莽茫o e de gest茫o da SIOFA. Por outro lado e na sequ锚ncia de tr锚s processos negociais de transposi莽茫o de recomenda莽玫es de organiza莽玫es de gest茫o e conserva莽茫o, a Comiss茫o volta a insistir, nesta transposi莽茫o, na utiliza莽茫o das chamadas refer锚ncias din芒micas, colocando em causa o direito dos operadores a conhecerem as suas obriga莽玫es na sua l铆ngua materna, tal como estabelecido nos Tratados e reiterado pelo Tribunal de Justi莽a da UE.

O recurso 脿s ditas refer锚ncias din芒micas tem sido sempre recusado pelo Parlamento Europeu, definindo um forte mandato para as rejeitar em negocia莽玫es interinstitucionais.

Desta feita e ap贸s discuss茫o e amplo acordo e maioria na Comiss茫o das Pescas, prop玫e-se a rejei莽茫o da proposta da Comiss茫o Europeia.

Lamentamos quer a apresenta莽茫o tardia da proposta da Comiss茫o ap贸s as recomenda莽玫es da SIOFA, como a insist锚ncia contra a recomenda莽茫o jur铆dica na apresenta莽茫o das ditas refer锚ncias din芒micas.

Lamentamos tamb茅m que, s贸 na imin锚ncia de uma rejei莽茫o desta proposta por parte de um dos colegisladores, a Comiss茫o tenha decidido afirmar a procura de uma solu莽茫o para esta e futuras transposi莽玫es. O figurino das sugest玫es que a Comiss茫o avan莽ou 茅 nebuloso, pouco claro ou sem ter um enquadramento legal ou or莽amental que o possibilite.

Pedem que o Parlamento altere a sua posi莽茫o, sem se comprometerem de forma clara com o abandono da insist锚ncia nas refer锚ncias din芒micas. Sugeri, atempadamente, que a proposta pudesse ser retirada. Tal permitiria interromper o processo e ganhar tempo a todos. Nada impediu ou impede a Comiss茫o de o fazer.

N茫o posso, contudo, aceitar que a Comiss茫o procure substituir-se ao Parlamento Europeu, imiscuir-se no seu papel de colegislador, determinando o que este deve ou n茫o fazer. Trata-se de uma postura inaceit谩vel.

A posi莽茫o assumida da Comiss茫o das Pescas e que proponho manter foi muito clara: rejeitar esta abordagem e proposta, dar por encerrada a primeira leitura. Convidamos o Conselho a assumir a mesma posi莽茫o, possibilitando 脿 Comiss茫o Europeia a apresenta莽茫o de nova proposta que se restrinja 脿s recomenda莽玫es da SIOFA e que n茫o inclua as ditas refer锚ncias din芒micas.

Tal permitir谩 que o Parlamento se possa pronunciar novamente sobre nova proposta no quadro do respeito entre institui莽玫es e os seus procedimentos internos. Posso dar a garantia de que este Parlamento estar谩 t茫o empenhado, ent茫o como sempre, em encontrar uma solu莽茫o que respeite o princ铆pio do multilinguismo e o direito dos operadores a conhecer as suas obriga莽玫es na sua l铆ngua materna.

听听V臎ra Jourov谩, Vice-President of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, honourable Members, I would like to thank the rapporteur for his work on the implementation of the measures under the Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement.

I welcome the fact that the European 合法博彩网站 acknowledges that this implementation is an EU obligation under international law. Therefore, I regret even more the call to reject the Commission proposal due to divergent views on how to insert into the EU regulation the administrative forms and templates of the international organisation, which under international law operators are required to use in their original format and language in order to be compliant.

While seeking to facilitate the implementation of that specific requirement for EU fishers, the Commission remains fully committed to give practical effect to multilingualism in the European Union. Every citizen should be able to acquaint themselves with all rights and obligations in their respective EU language. We share these values with the European 合法博彩网站, and I regret that our institutions could not yet find a mutually acceptable solution that could address the concerns mentioned by the rapporteur.

The Commission has offered to make available, on the Commission website, translations into all EU languages of those forms and templates. Alternatively, and instead of dynamic references to measures of international bodies, the Commission is ready to explore the creation of an EU registry as a single point of reference for EU operators, containing all reference, relevant forms and templates of regional fisheries management organisations in their most updated version in all EU languages.

The proposed solutions would allow for swift information of operators in all EU languages in case of any changes of forms or templates at international level. This approach would ensure legal clarity regarding the correct forms to be filled in by EU fishers and avoid unnecessary procedural delays in the implementation of international measures, which would not only put EU fishers in a disadvantaged position but also at risk of involuntary infringement, which in turn could lead to reputational damage for the EU.

The Commission remains ready to discuss these solutions further. Therefore, I urge you to continue this work with the Commission and to refer this file back to the PECH Committee. I can assure you that the Commission will be willing to uphold a mutually agreed solution to this file 鈥� also in all future proposals of the same nature. I hope that, in the spirit of mutual sincere cooperation, you can accept the hand that I stretch out to you today.

听听Cl谩udia Monteiro de Aguiar, em nome do Grupo PPE. 鈥� Senhora Presidente, Senhora Comiss谩ria, 茅 de come莽ar por lamentar que o comiss谩rio da tutela n茫o esteja aqui, hoje, connosco, para ouvir aquilo que temos a relatar sobre o acordo aqui em discuss茫o.

Poder铆amos discutir hoje as pol铆ticas p煤blicas e as regras desenhadas no presente acordo, mas n茫o o faremos. Poder铆amos debater a urg锚ncia do apoio ao setor das pescas para que a sua gest茫o seja sustent谩vel e eficiente, mas n茫o o faremos.

Hoje, o que aqui defendemos 茅 o respeito pelo trabalho de cada um de n贸s, representantes dos cidad茫os portugueses, dos cidad茫os europeus, enquanto colegisladores do Parlamento.

Senhora Comiss谩ria, o Parlamento Europeu pediu e apresentou alternativas ao presente acordo. Adiou vota莽玫es na Comiss茫o das Pescas para dar tempo 脿 Comiss茫o para emendar as falhas a que sujeitou este acordo. A Comiss茫o fez t谩bua rasa dos nossos pedidos. Podia discorrer sobre o conte煤do do acordo, mas vejo-me obrigada a sublinhar o facto de os servi莽os legais das tr锚s institui莽玫es europeias apontarem falhas 脿 Comiss茫o, a guardi茫 dos Tratados.

A n茫o tradu莽茫o dos textos em todas as l铆nguas impede uma verdadeira compreens茫o e participa莽茫o de todos os cidad茫os na sua pr贸pria l铆ngua. Ao rejeitarem o multilinguismo, est茫o a desvalorizar a import芒ncia de todos aqueles que representamos e com isso n茫o podemos pactuar.

Rejeitar este acordo 茅 um voto pela igualdade de acesso e de respeito pela comunidade e pelos cidad茫os. 脡 um voto de preserva莽茫o do multilinguismo e um voto que expressa o respeito que exigimos pelo papel do Parlamento Europeu, enquanto colegislador.

听听Isabel Carvalhais, em nome do Grupo S&D. 鈥� Senhora Presidente, Senhora Comiss谩ria, Caros Colegas, come莽o por agradecer as interven莽玫es dos meus colegas e, muito em especial, a posi莽茫o de grande hombridade do nosso relator na defesa do Parlamento enquanto colegislador.

脡 lament谩vel, sabemos, ter de estar aqui e chegar a esta necessidade de propor rejeitar a proposta da Comiss茫o. Contudo, n贸s n茫o podemos aceitar que a Comiss茫o argumente sobre este assunto como sendo apenas uma quest茫o de diverg锚ncias quanto 脿 t茅cnica legislativa que escolheu para os formul谩rios de ORGP a utilizar pelos operadores.

Relembro que existem ac贸rd茫os do Tribunal de Justi莽a da Uni茫o, nomeadamente os ac贸rd茫os de James Elliot e Stichting e ainda a recente opini茫o, com apenas duas semanas, da advogada-geral do Tribunal de Justi莽a no processo C-588/21P que, clara e consistentemente, afirmam que nenhuma medida pode substituir a obriga莽茫o de publicar todas as informa莽玫es num jornal oficial.

Ora, defender a publica莽茫o de todas as informa莽玫es nas l铆nguas oficiais da Uni茫o no Jornal Oficial 茅 assegurar a acessibilidade e a aplica莽茫o dos documentos oficiais a todos os cidad茫os, muito em particular, 茅 a forma de garantir a seguran莽a jur铆dica aos nossos operadores. N茫o 茅 uma quest茫o de diverg锚ncia t茅cnica.

Temos solicitado, em v谩rias ocasi玫es, que a Comiss茫o Europeia retire esta proposta no sentido de proceder 脿 sua devida corre莽茫o, porque o Parlamento s贸 pode e s贸 deve fazer o trabalho que lhe compete e nada mais.

听听Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, en nombre del Grupo Renew. 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, se帽ora comisaria, quiero anunciar en este debate mi oposici贸n a la propuesta de la Comisi贸n Europea, censurando tres aspectos de la misma:

En primer lugar est谩 el retraso en transponer unas medidas de conservaci贸n, control y ordenaci贸n de pesca en el 脥ndico Meridional adoptadas por el Consejo Consultivo de Pesca del 脥ndico: el SIOFA, que llega siete a帽os tarde. La Uni贸n Europea es parte contratante de esta OROP desde 2008, por lo que sus acuerdos la vinculan.

En segundo lugar, la introducci贸n de referencias din谩micas, que tienen la supuesta intenci贸n de acelerar la transposici贸n, pero que van mucho m谩s all谩 de los acuerdos originales, alterando las medidas que se deben transponer.

En tercer lugar, la resistencia a comunicar a los afectados en su propia lengua el alcance de estas medidas.

Hemos expresado estas posiciones claramente a la Comisi贸n en estos meses, pero las posturas no se mueven. Por eso, es hora de decir no a esta forma de hacer que, una vez m谩s, afecta negativamente al sector de la pesca europea.

听听France Jamet, au nom du groupe ID. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, mes chers coll猫gues, symbole de la puissance maritime fran莽aise, situ茅e au c艙ur d鈥檜ne zone de haute mer de 30听millions de kilom猫tres carr茅s, notre magnifique 脦le de la R茅union a 茅t茅 d茅sign茅e comme si猫ge de l鈥檕rganisation issue des accords APSOI relatifs aux p锚ches dans le Sud de l鈥檕c茅an Indien conclu entre l鈥橴nion europ茅enne, la France et six autres 脡tats maritimes. Et je ne peux que m鈥檈n r茅jouir.

Si, 茅videmment, je partage la position de M.听Pimenta听Lopes sur la forme, et notamment sur l鈥檃spect linguistique que mes coll猫gues viennent de relever, j鈥檃i au-del脿 des remarques 脿 faire sur le fond. Il est quand m锚me pr茅occupant qu鈥檃u terme de ces accords, les politiques europ茅ennes aillent dans le sens d鈥檜n soutien ind茅fectible, et je dirais m锚me syst茅matique, 脿 ceux que je qualifierai de financiers de la mer: la p锚che macro-industrielle des multinationales.

脌 l鈥檋eure o霉 l鈥檈njeu environnemental est capital et o霉 le d茅veloppement de l鈥櫭ヽonomie bleue est fondamental, il est n茅cessaire de pr茅server notre mod猫le de p锚che traditionnel, ses emplois induits et l鈥檈nvironnement. 脌 commencer par tout ce qui contribuera 脿 lutter contre la p锚che ill茅gale, non d茅clar茅e et non r茅glement茅e, et contre la piraterie. Et pour cela, nous devons nous appuyer sur une coop茅ration renforc茅e avec tous les 脡tats riverains de l鈥檕c茅an Indien, bien s没r, tous, y compris la Chine et l鈥橧nde.

听听Gabriel Mato (PPE). 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, se帽ora comisaria, quisiera, en primer lugar, destacar el trabajo que lleva a cabo la Comisi贸n en las organizaciones regionales de ordenaci贸n pesquera, contribuyendo decisivamente a la gobernanza de los oc茅anos a escala internacional. Muchas veces me ha escuchado el comisario mis cr铆ticas y hoy quiero reiterar nuestra oposici贸n a las medidas discriminatorias e injustas para la flota de la Uni贸n Europea adoptadas en la Comisi贸n del At煤n para el Oc茅ano 脥ndico.

Dicho esto, se帽ora comisaria, a la hora de transponer los acuerdos, la Comisi贸n impone a los pescadores de la Uni贸n medidas muy estrictas, lo que no sucede con las flotas no comunitarias, y ello implica desigualdad de condiciones entre todos los operadores que faenan en la misma zona y comercializan sus productos en los mismos mercados, con la consiguiente p茅rdida de competitividad de nuestros operadores frente a los operadores extranjeros.

Otra cuesti贸n que quiero destacar, y ya se ha hecho hoy aqu铆, es que la transposici贸n debe dejarse en manos de los colegisladores y no realizarse mediante actos delegados, sobre todo para evitar situaciones en las que la Comisi贸n va mucho m谩s lejos de lo acordado.

Finalmente, no quiero dejar pasar por alto una realidad preocupante: es absolutamente inaceptable que la propuesta de la Comisi贸n llegue al Parlamento con meses o incluso, como es el caso, a帽os de retraso, d谩ndose la paradoja de que cuando aprobamos el texto las medidas ya han sido reiteradamente modificadas. Comisaria, establezcan una manera eficaz de transponer r谩pidamente las medidas adoptadas en las organizaciones internacionales, porque la buena gobernanza, adem谩s, empieza por respetar el papel que desempe帽a cada instituci贸n en la Uni贸n Europea.

Pyynn枚st盲 my枚nnett盲v盲t puheenvuorot

听听Mick Wallace (The Left). 鈥� Madam President, the Irish fishing industry is predicted to lose EUR 43听million worth of quota share by 2026 under the EU-UK free trade agreement. This will amount to a 15% reduction in the overall value of Irish fish quotas compared to 2020. Ireland was proportionally massively more impacted by the Brexit agreement than any other Member State. The upcoming review of the common fisheries policy must address the hugely disproportionate impact of Brexit on the Irish fishing industry, including these imbalances in the quota transfers.

But it also needs to increase Irish quota shares overall. Let鈥檚 not forget: the common fisheries policy shafted Irish fishermen right from the start. The CFP allows foreign boats to catch up to 85% of the fish in Irish waters. Yet Irish boats get no reciprocal access to the waters of other Member States. It looks like the EU solidarity is in short supply for Ireland鈥檚 fishing communities.

(Pyynn枚st盲 my枚nnett盲v盲t puheenvuorot p盲盲ttyv盲t)

听听V臎ra Jourov谩, Vice-President of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, Honourable Members, I would like to thank you for this debate and briefly come back to certain questions raised. In concrete, I will react to the comments regarding the time aspects, translations and the registry.

First, on the time which is needed for transposing measures agreed several years ago, the Commission is working intensively to implement the decisions of all regional fisheries management organisations. However, given the limited resources available, a prioritisation of that work is inevitable. The Commission thus seeks to balance the economic and political significance of the measures to be implemented and the available resources to do that.

Over the last five years, we have been able to table seven such proposals, five out of which are already adopted. At the end of 2017, we had regulations covering measures of only three fisheries management organisations.

Now, on the official translations 鈥� as I said earlier 鈥� under international law, operators are required to use the relevant forms in their original format and language in order to be compliant, and they are used to doing that, in fact. At the same time, we take very seriously the aspect of being able to consult these forms in one鈥檚 own language, which is why the Commission has been exploring alternatives that can combine the legal necessities with the principle of multilingualism, and at the same time ensure an efficient use of the limited resources available.

And the third comment is on the registry. The Commission has genuinely been trying to find a solution that will allow us to fulfil our legal obligations, and provide legal clarity for EU fishing operators and information in every EU language. This is how we started looking at the idea of an EU registry that would allow us 鈥� instead of having a dynamic reference to the website of a regional fisheries management organisation 鈥� to refer to an online EU registry containing all forms in force at the level of these organisations and making them available in all EU languages. The exact modalities of this EU registry would need to be determined, however, by all three institutions and respect the existing allocation of resources.

In conclusion, I hope that this report will be referred back to the committee so that our two institutions can continue their work and deliver a permanent solution for our fishermen and women.

听听Jo茫o Pimenta Lopes, relator. 鈥� Senhora Presidente, Cara Comiss谩ria, Caros Relatores鈥擲ombra, registo que a Comiss茫o continua a n茫o abrir m茫o da sua posi莽茫o e a contribuir para uma solu莽茫o.

Registo a insist锚ncia, e direi melhor, a teimosia da Comiss茫o Europeia, a mesma teimosia que tenho identificado em outros ficheiros de maior monta e que temos discutido na Comiss茫o das Pescas, com profundo impacto para o sector.

Direi: o bloqueio 脿s possibilidades de renova莽茫o da frota, particularmente de pequena pesca costeira e artesanal, que se encontra obsoleta; a insist锚ncia em considerar os pescadores como incumpridores 脿 partida, impondo ainda maiores restri莽玫es 脿 pesca por via do regulamento de controlo; a insist锚ncia em confundir pot锚ncia de motor com capacidade de pesca; a decis茫o de impor restri莽玫es 脿 pesca de fundo em 谩reas sem envolver o sector e sem estudos adequados 藯 s茫o exemplos da inflexibilidade que a Comiss茫o sempre demonstra e que, neste caso, continua a demonstrar.

A Comiss茫o procura colocar o 贸nus da responsabilidade desta decis茫o sobre o Parlamento Europeu, quando a m茫o que diz estender, sabe-o t茫o bem como n贸s, n茫o 茅 uma garantia de solu莽茫o.

O registo que prop玫e carece de acordo tripartido e n茫o garante, neste momento, a inscri莽茫o no jornal oficial que oferece a garantia jur铆dica. Rejeitamos esse 贸nus que, insisto, recai inteiramente na Comiss茫o nesta transposi莽茫o.

Poder铆amos n茫o estar nesta situa莽茫o. A posi莽茫o un芒nime expressa pelas interven莽玫es em plen谩rio demonstra-o.

Senhora Comiss谩ria, aceite com humildade as cr铆ticas que aqui foram feitas. Estaremos dispon铆veis para continuar o trabalho com base numa nova proposta que, insisto, propomos 脿 Comiss茫o que venha a apresentar o mais rapidamente poss铆vel.

听听Puhemies. 鈥� Keskustelu on p盲盲ttynyt.

脛盲nestys toimitetaan huomenna tiistaina 11. hein盲kuuta 2023.

听听Puhemies. 鈥� Esityslistalla on seuraavana komission julkilausuma ty枚ntekij枚iden suojelemisesta ilmastokriisist盲 johtuvilta 盲盲rimm盲iselt盲 kuumuudelta ja muilta 盲盲rimm盲isilt盲 s盲盲ilmi枚ilt盲 ().

J盲senille ilmoitetaan, ett盲 poliittisten ryhmien puheenvuoroja on vain yksi kierros, mink盲 vuoksi pyynn枚st盲 my枚nnett盲vi盲 puheenvuoroja ei anneta eik盲 sinisen kortin kysymyksi盲 hyv盲ksyt盲.

听听Nicolas Schmit, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, honourable members, the last eight years were the hottest on record globally. And last week, Monday 3 July, we saw the highest average global temperature ever. According to a recent study by the ILO, by 2030 more than 2 % working hours worldwide is projected to be lost every year. Heat stress is a threat for workers鈥� health and temperatures exceeding 39 degrees can kill. It obviously has an impact also on economic activity and on productivity. Europe is the fastest warming continent on earth, with earlier heatwaves, intensifying droughts and more flooding.

Climate change and heatwaves exert a profound impact on individuals with essential workers on the front lines bearing a particularly heavy burden. These workers endure heightened risks to their physical and mental well-being as they carry out their essential duties in extreme conditions. And these risks are expected to grow over the coming decades. Extreme heat events can cause, for example, heat exhaustion and heat stroke. Higher temperatures can also increase the risk of injuries due to lack of concentration. Moreover, higher temperatures may aggravate exposure to hazardous chemicals, for example, when working with solvents. In addition, a significant reduction in productivity occurs when temperatures raise too high. It is therefore urgent and important to properly address these kinds of risks because all workers are entitled to a healthy and safe working environment.

The need for risk assessment, including that of high temperature, is echoed in the EU legislation. In addition, the EU Strategic Framework on Health and Safety at Work 2021-2027 clearly refers to higher ambient temperature, air pollution and extreme weather as risks for workers鈥� health and safety and the need for increased awareness. For this reason, we have been working on a range of guidance at EU and national level for climate change and associated osh risks. The recent high level meeting in Stockholm on health and safety has reaffirmed the necessity to implement the different elements of this strategic framework. The most recent example is the new guide Heat at Work Guidance for Workplaces from the EU Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA). The guide provides practical guidance on how to manage and prevent the risks associated with working in heat and information on what to do if a worker begins to suffer from a heat-related illness. Climate change is a reality and it will impact all areas of our life, including many working places, namely in sectors like construction, cleaning, agriculture and so on.

We will work with 合法博彩网站 as well as with Member States and social partners to protect workers鈥� health in conformity with our steady commitment for health and safety at the working place.

听听Helmut Geuking, im Namen der PPE-Fraktion. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, sehr geehrter Herr Kommissar Schmit! So sieht man sich wieder. Was Sie gerade gesagt haben, ist mir nicht genug, muss ich Ihnen ganz ehrlich sagen. Sie haben sich auf die IAO-Studie berufen 鈥� 2,2听% der Arbeitsstunden werden global bis 2030 wegfallen. Das macht 80听Millionen Vollzeitpl盲tze in Gesamtvolumen von 2,1听Billionen Euro听鈥� nur mal so, um eine Gr枚脽enordnung zu sagen. Mit Leitfaden k枚nnen wir dem nicht begegnen.

Es ist auch nicht听鈥� wenn ich nach Deutschland schaue听鈥� zum Beispiel das, was die deutsche Regierung macht im Klein-Klein. Wir m眉ssen Klima global denken. Wir m眉ssen Ma脽nahmen ergreifen in Sachen Arbeitsschutz f眉r die Menschen. Sie haben vollkommen recht, wenn Sie sagen: Die Menschen sind nat眉rlich jetzt ganz anderen Stoffen ausgesetzt: L枚sungsstoffen, die freigesetzt werden ab 35听Grad, woran man vorher gar nicht gedacht hat. Da sind Sachen, die auf uns zurollen, was ein enormer Kostenaufwand ist. Man geht alleine gesundheitspolitisch davon aus, dass wir听鈥� die ganzen Allergien zum Beispiel, denn der Pollenflug wird sich durch diese Erw盲rmung und durch diesen Klimaschutz um 40 bis 60听% erh枚hen听鈥� viel mehr Krankheits- und Ausf盲lle haben werden, auch im Arbeitsleben. Die Hitze, wie Sie sagen: Arbeiten Sie mal im Stra脽enbau bei diesem Wetter, es ist schier unm枚glich.

Das hei脽t, das ganze Leben, die Arbeitsbedingungen werden sich ver盲ndern m眉ssen und werden sich ver盲ndern. Europa muss hier entsprechend t盲tig werden, und Europa muss hier entsprechend ganz klare Richtlinien herausgeben, woran sich die L盲nder auch halten m眉ssen zum Wohle der Menschen, dass sie mit diesem Klima Schritt halten k枚nnen und nicht schwer erkranken. Denn jeder Krankheitsausfall in den Firmen kostet bares Geld und Steuergelder.

Ja, leider ist die Redezeit zu Ende, es g盲be noch so vieles zu sagen.

听听Elisabetta Gualmini, a nome del gruppo S&D. 鈥� Signora Presidente, signor Commissario, onorevoli colleghi, le inondazioni torrenziali in Emilia Romagna del maggio scorso sono un caso esemplare dell'impatto della crisi climatica su imprese e lavoratori. Abbiamo avuto oltre 12听000 aziende agricole devastate, 14听000 altre imprese distrutte, 15 morti, tra cui lavoratori.

Noi ci crediamo veramente alla lotta al cambiamento climatico, certo con buonsenso, con ragionevolezza, accompagnando la transizione ecologica con compensazioni per famiglie e imprese, quindi senza fissazioni e ideologie.

Invece la destra in Europa al cambiamento climatico non ci crede. Non ci crede la destra al governo in Italia, perch茅 ha cincischiato per un mese e mezzo prima di nominare un commissario alla ricostruzione, mettendo veti sull'unica persona che poteva farlo, cio猫 il presidente della Regione. Non ci crede la destra di Meloni che 猫 affetta da schizofrenia per cui, da un lato, dice che per ricostruire servono nove-dieci anni e poi nomina il commissario per un anno, guarda caso proprio in concomitanza con le elezioni regionali. E non ci crede la destra di Meloni perch茅 ancora non ha fatto richiesta del Fondo di solidariet脿 europeo, che la Commissione ha pure aumentato, la cui scadenza 猫 il 25 luglio e si rischia di perdere centinaia di milioni sulla pelle dei lavoratori.

Perch茅 tra destra e progressisti c'猫 una bella differenza sulle crisi climatiche e l'impatto sui lavoratori e l'ambiente: la destra 猫 innamorata del fossile, la destra nega che il surriscaldamento sia tale.

Invece noi pensiamo che occorra prevenire, mitigare, aiutare tutti i lavoratori in un ambiente di lavoro migliore e ripristinare un po' di sana natura. Per fortuna destra e sinistra sono cos矛 lontane, e io dico, ben venga!

听听Marie-Pierre Vedrenne, au nom du groupe Renew. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Monsieur le Commissaire, en听2022, 60听000 personnes sont d茅c茅d茅es en Europe 脿 cause des chaleurs extr锚mes. 60听000 personnes. Un nombre inconcevable. Et m锚me avec des temp茅ratures excessives, les personnes directement expos茅es aux canicules sont toujours au travail. Ouvriers du b芒timent, agriculteurs, 茅boueurs, entre des centaines d鈥檃utres d鈥檃ctivit茅s, ils restent toujours mobilis茅s pour le bon fonctionnement de notre soci茅t茅.

Vous l鈥檃vez dit, Monsieur le Commissaire, nous vivons une 茅poque o霉 les temp茅ratures augmentent, o霉 les vagues de chaleur deviennent de plus en plus extr锚mes, rendant le travail toujours plus difficile, notamment 脿 l鈥檈xt茅rieur, notamment pour les travailleurs manuels, notamment pour ceux qui occupent des emplois pr茅caires. Notre responsabilit茅 reste de veiller 脿 ce qu鈥檌ls soient tous en s茅curit茅, quelles que soient les conditions climatiques. Et face 脿 cette situation in茅dite, il nous faut mettre en place de nouvelles r猫gles. Il nous faut am茅nager les conditions de travail, que ce soit avec des 茅quipements de protection, avec des infrastructures adapt茅es ou m锚me avec des mesures d鈥檜rgence.

La protection des travailleurs n鈥檈st que la face immerg茅e de l鈥檌ceberg. Le sujet demeure toujours la protection de l鈥檈nvironnement. Elle doit aller de pair avec la lutte contre le changement climatique. Elle doit aller de pair avec notre engagement envers le pacte vert. Elle doit aller de pair avec notre engagement de justice sociale.

听听Rosa D'Amato, a nome del gruppo Verts/ALE. 鈥� Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, periodicamente ci ritroviamo qui a richiedere l'attivazione del Fondo di solidariet脿 in seguito a incendi, a inondazioni che colpiscono il Nord, il Sud e il centro dell'Europa.

Colleghi, siamo tutti d'accordo che prevenire 猫 meglio che curare? S矛. Ve lo chiedo perch茅 in questo Parlamento c'猫 chi, con l'aiuto di certa stampa, non tutta, nega l'azione colpevole dell'uomo, nega il cambiamento climatico e, per di pi霉, accusa noi Verdi di tutti i mali del mondo.

La verit脿 猫 sotto gli occhi di tutti: questi eventi sempre pi霉 frequenti hanno un impatto spropositato anche sulle professioni pi霉 vulnerabili. Mi riferisco, in particolare, ai vigili del fuoco, una delle categorie pi霉 esposte.

Che ne 猫, Commissario, dell'attuazione della direttiva quadro 89/331 e delle successive? Come li proteggiamo dall'esposizione ad agenti chimici, fisici, biologici? Sono attuate le procedure di decontaminazione, dei dispositivi di protezione individuale? Che ne 猫 della sorveglianza sanitaria? E, soprattutto, hanno la copertura assicurativa per gli infortuni?

Un corpo dello Stato che protegge la vita dei cittadini tutti i giorni, mettendo a rischio la propria, di vita, in molti Stati, come il mio, non gode neanche della copertura assicurativa nazionale.

I nostri ragazzi nella civile Europa sono mandati allo sbaraglio. 脠 uno scandalo!

Ai cittadini dico: non abboccate alle bugie della destra. Saranno i primi a voltarsi dall'altra parte quando ne avrete bisogno, lo stanno gi脿 facendo. Navigano a vista, senza una visione chiara e senza soluzioni reali.

Oggi, qui, servono misure concrete per mettere i nostri territori in sicurezza e renderli resilienti. Non agire adesso avr脿 un costo incalcolabile domani e la pagheranno i nostri figli e i nostri nipoti.

听听Mathilde Androu毛t, au nom du groupe ID. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, l鈥橴nion europ茅enne a une 茅trange tendance 脿 d茅plorer les situations auxquelles elle contribue pourtant par ses politiques. Nous nous inqui茅tons aujourd鈥檋ui des temp茅ratures extr锚mes que subissent les travailleurs, mais, il y a moins de 24听heures, l鈥橴nion europ茅enne a sign茅 un accord de libre-茅change avec la Nouvelle-Z茅lande, un accord qui devrait entra卯ner une hausse de 30听% des 茅changes commerciaux avec un pays parmi les plus 茅loign茅s de l鈥橴nion europ茅enne.

Sans 锚tre devin ni climatologue, on peut dire que ce genre de d茅cision est lamentable du point de vue du bilan carbone qui devrait m茅caniquement gonfler, en plus d鈥櫭猼re une d茅cision criminelle vis-脿-vis des emplois agricoles europ茅ens.

Tant que l鈥橴nion europ茅enne pratiquera la religion du libre-茅change mondial, ses choix en mati猫re de politique environnementale de grande 茅chelle seront sabot茅s. Tant que l鈥橴nion europ茅enne encouragera la concentration des individus et la b茅tonisation m茅canique de cette concentration forc茅ment urbaine, nous ne cesserons pas d鈥檃ffoler les thermom猫tres. Nous pouvons et devons reboiser. Nous pouvons et devons ralentir le ruissellement des eaux de pluie vers les mers et oc茅ans. Mais quelle utilit茅 si nos pays ne sont que des d茅serts ruraux ponctu茅s de m茅tropoles fournaises?

Si nous ne rompons pas avec cette logique d鈥檈ntassement ou d鈥櫭﹖alement urbain qui d茅grade la qualit茅 de vie des Europ茅ens, qui appauvrit les sols, incapables de retenir les eaux de pluie, provoquant des inondations ou faisant monter le mercure, nous ne ferons que des caut猫res sur une jambe de bois.

Vouloir couvrir l鈥橢urope de quartiers d鈥檃ffaires comme la d茅fense ou Bankenviertel ou de zones industrielles et commerciales compos茅es de cubes de t么les faisant office de bureaux et de magasins o霉 fl芒ner condamnera toujours les travailleurs expos茅s aux fortes temp茅ratures.

On a donc 脿 l鈥檕rdre du jour un sujet pour donner des gages 茅cologistes. Mais, dans le fond, rien ne changera, car vous ne voulez pas changer la philosophie de cette union. Vivement听2024!

听听Eugenia Rodr铆guez Palop, en nombre del Grupo The Left. 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, seg煤n la OIT, si aumentar谩 la temperatura un grado y medio, Espa帽a perder铆a cada a帽o cerca de 7听700 puestos de trabajo y en algunos sectores precarizados con alta siniestralidad, como el de la construcci贸n o la agricultura por ejemplo, no se hablar铆a ya de perder el trabajo, sino de perder la vida y la salud debido al calor, al estr茅s t茅rmico y a otros riesgos asociados al cambio clim谩tico.

Est谩 claro que, en materia de seguridad y salud en el trabajo, no basta con simples directrices, necesitamos normas vinculantes, tambi茅n instrumentos como el Convenio 184 de la OIT. En Espa帽a, gracias al Ministerio de Trabajo, la jornada laboral se tiene que adaptar a las condiciones meteorol贸gicas cuando son extremas. Se ha optado por la prevenci贸n sobre una evaluaci贸n de riesgos laborales que considera tanto las caracter铆sticas del trabajo como del trabajador.

Ahora queremos poner en marcha una estrategia nacional que incluya medidas de este tipo, porque cualquier trabajo que no se adapte al cambio clim谩tico ser谩 un trabajo en precario y porque, si no apostamos seriamente por esa adaptaci贸n, se impondr谩n las salidas ecofascistas que hemos visto en Texas, donde los trabajadores no pueden dejar de trabajar ni para beber agua.

听听螞蔚蠀蟿苇蟻畏蟼 螡喂魏慰位维慰蠀-螒位伪尾维谓慰蟼 (NI). 鈥� 螝蠀蟻委伪 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 蟽蟿畏 蠂蠋蟻伪 渭慰蠀 蟿畏谓 螘位位维未伪, 维位位慰蟼 苇谓伪蟼 蔚蟻纬伪味蠈渭蔚谓慰蟼 苇蠂伪蟽蔚 蟿畏 味蠅萎 蟿慰蠀 蟺蟻喂谓 未蠉慰 渭苇蟻蔚蟼, 蟽蟿伪 螡伪蠀蟺畏纬蔚委伪 螘位蔚蠀蟽委谓伪蟼, 蠈蟿伪谓 蟽蟿维位胃畏魏蔚 纬喂伪 蠀蟺蔚蟻蠅蟻委蔚蟼 渭苇蟽伪 蟽蟿慰 位喂慰蟺蠉蟻喂, 蔚谓蠋 伪谓蟿喂渭蔚蟿蠋蟺喂味蔚 蟺蟻慰尾位萎渭伪蟿伪 蠀纬蔚委伪蟼. 螚 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 螆谓蠅蟽畏 魏维谓蔚喂 魏维蟺慰喂蔚蟼 渭畏 蠀蟺慰蠂蟻蔚蠅蟿喂魏苇蟼 蟽蠀蟽蟿维蟽蔚喂蟼 魏伪喂 蔚蟺喂未喂蠋魏蔚喂 谓伪 蟻委尉蔚喂 蟿畏谓 蔚蠀胃蠉谓畏 蟽蟿畏谓 魏位喂渭伪蟿喂魏萎 伪位位伪纬萎. 螌渭蠅蟼 纬喂伪 蟿伪 未蠀蟽蟿蠀蠂萎渭伪蟿伪 -蔚蟻纬慰未慰蟿喂魏维 蔚纬魏位萎渭伪蟿伪- 蔚蠀胃蠉谓慰谓蟿伪喂 蠈位蔚蟼 未喂伪蠂蟻慰谓喂魏维 慰喂 魏蠀尾蔚蟻谓萎蟽蔚喂蟼 魏伪喂 畏 蔚蠀蟻蠅蔚谓蠅蟽喂伪魏萎 蟽蟿蟻伪蟿畏纬喂魏萎, 蟺慰蠀 苇蠂慰蠀谓 尉蔚蠂伪蟻尾伪位蠋蟽蔚喂 蟿喂蟼 蔚蟻纬伪蟽喂伪魏苇蟼 蟽蠂苇蟽蔚喂蟼 魏伪喂 蟿慰蠀蟼 魏蟻伪蟿喂魏慰蠉蟼 蔚位蔚纬魏蟿喂魏慰蠉蟼 渭畏蠂伪谓喂蟽渭慰蠉蟼 蟺蟻慰蟼 蠈蠁蔚位慰蟼 蟿畏蟼 魏蔚蟻未慰蠁慰蟻委伪蟼 蟿蠅谓 慰渭委位蠅谓.

螣喂 蔚蟻纬伪味蠈渭蔚谓慰喂 谓伪 渭畏谓 伪蟺慰未蔚蠂蟿慰蠉谓 蠅蟼 魏伪谓慰谓喂魏蠈蟿畏蟿伪 谓伪 未慰蠀位蔚蠉慰蠀谓 蟽蔚 蟿苇蟿慰喂蔚蟼 蟽蠀谓胃萎魏蔚蟼 慰蠉蟿蔚 蟿畏 尾伪蟻尾伪蟻蠈蟿畏蟿伪 蠈蟿喂 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 蟺维谓蔚 纬喂伪 未慰蠀位蔚喂维 魏伪喂 谓伪 渭畏谓 蔚蟺喂蟽蟿蟻苇蠄慰蠀谓. 螠苇蟽伪 伪蟺蠈 蟿伪 蟽蠅渭伪蟿蔚委伪 蟿慰蠀蟼 谓伪 伪蟺伪喂蟿萎蟽慰蠀谓 维渭蔚蟽畏 未喂伪魏慰蟺萎 蔚蟻纬伪蟽委伪蟼 蟽蔚 胃蔚蟻渭慰魏蟻伪蟽委蔚蟼 蟺维谓蠅 伪蟺蠈 38 尾伪胃渭慰蠉蟼 萎 魏伪喂 蠂伪渭畏位蠈蟿蔚蟻伪, 伪谓维位慰纬伪 渭蔚 蟿慰谓 蟿蠉蟺慰 蟿畏蟼 蔚蟻纬伪蟽委伪蟼, 渭蔚 蟺位萎蟻畏 魏伪蟿伪尾慰位萎 蟿慰蠀 畏渭蔚蟻慰渭喂蟽胃委慰蠀, 蟺蔚蟻喂慰蟻喂蟽渭蠈 蟿蠅谓 尾伪蟻喂蠋谓 蔚蟻纬伪蟽喂蠋谓 魏伪喂 蟺位萎蟻畏 伪蟺慰蠂萎 伪蟺蠈 蟿畏谓 蔚蟻纬伪蟽委伪 蟿蠅谓 慰渭维未蠅谓 蠀蠄畏位慰蠉 魏喂谓未蠉谓慰蠀. 螡伪 魏位喂渭伪魏蠋蟽慰蠀谓 蟿慰谓 伪纬蠋谓伪 纬喂伪 蟽蠀位位慰纬喂魏苇蟼 蟽蠀渭尾维蟽蔚喂蟼 蔚蟻纬伪蟽委伪蟼 渭蔚 伪蠀尉萎蟽蔚喂蟼 蟺慰蠀 谓伪 魏伪蟿慰蠂蠀蟻蠋谓慰蠀谓 渭苇蟿蟻伪 伪蟽蠁伪位蔚委伪蟼 蟽蟿畏谓 蔚蟻纬伪蟽委伪. 螡伪 伪蟺伪喂蟿萎蟽慰蠀谓 蟽蟿蔚位苇蠂蠅蟽畏 蟿蠅谓 未畏渭蠈蟽喂蠅谓 谓慰蟽慰魏慰渭蔚委蠅谓, 蟿慰蠀 螘螝螒螔, 纬喂伪蟿蟻慰蠉蟼 魏伪喂 谓慰蟽畏位蔚蠀蟿喂魏蠈 蟺蟻慰蟽蠅蟺喂魏蠈 蟽蟿慰蠀蟼 蟿蠈蟺慰蠀蟼 未慰蠀位蔚喂维蟼, 蔚谓委蟽蠂蠀蟽畏 蟿蠅谓 魏蟻伪蟿喂魏蠋谓 蠀蟺畏蟻蔚蟽喂蠋谓 蔚位苇纬蠂慰蠀.

听听Nicolas Schmit, membre de la Commission. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, d鈥檃bord, je tiens 脿 remercier le Parlement d鈥檃voir mis ce sujet 脿 l鈥檕rdre du jour et d鈥檃voir organis茅 ce d茅bat, puisqu鈥檌l s鈥檃git-l脿 d鈥檜n probl猫me r茅el qui affecte des millions de travailleurs en Europe et au-del脿. Vous avez amplement d茅crit les situations compliqu茅es que ces travailleurs affrontent, compte tenu des temp茅ratures. On nous annonce demain, 脿 Strasbourg, plus de 37听degr茅s. Vous pouvez donc imaginer comment les personnes travaillent dans ces conditions.

Je tiens 脿 rappeler d鈥檃bord qu鈥檌l y a un principe fondamental dans la directive-cadre sur la sant茅 et la s茅curit茅 au travail. Il est de la responsabilit茅 de l鈥檈mployeur d鈥檃ssurer la sant茅 et la s茅curit茅 de ses collaborateurs, de ses travailleurs. Et je crois qu鈥檜n employeur engage sa responsabilit茅 quand il fait travailler quelqu鈥檜n dans des conditions qui ont un impact extr锚mement n茅gatif sur la sant茅 et pr茅sentent des risques, parfois mortels, comme cela vient d鈥櫭猼re rappel茅. Il faut donc rappeler cette responsabilit茅-l脿.

Par ailleurs, il existe un certain nombre de directives qui font d茅j脿 r茅f茅rence 脿 ces situations de temp茅ratures excessives et aux pr茅cautions qu鈥檌l faut prendre en pareil cas. Il y a toujours eu des gens qui ont travaill茅 dans des conditions extr锚mement difficiles, surtout il y a quelques ann茅es. Cela a peut-锚tre un peu chang茅. Dans une aci茅rie, pr猫s d鈥檜n haut fourneau, les temp茅ratures d茅passent les 30听degr茅s. Et donc, dans ce contexte-l脿, il est absolument indispensable que les employeurs aussi prennent des dispositifs pour prot茅ger les travailleurs.

Et donc nous allons 茅videmment suivre maintenant l鈥櫭﹙olution. Et je crois que, dans une premi猫re phase, ces lignes directrices sont tr猫s claires et sont exhaustives et pr茅cises quant aux des risques encourus par les travailleurs dans ces conditions de temp茅rature excessive et rappellent aussi les responsabilit茅s, notamment des employeurs.

C鈥檈st un nouveau sujet d鈥檜ne certaine mani猫re, puisque de nouveaux travailleurs, de nouvelles cat茅gories de travailleurs sont expos茅s. Nous allons continuer 脿 suivre ce dossier, comme je l鈥檃i dit, avec les 脡tats membres, avec votre Parlement qui a montr茅 une tr猫s forte sensibilit茅 sur ce sujet et 茅videmment aussi avec les partenaires sociaux. Il faudra, le cas 茅ch茅ant, envisager des mesures suppl茅mentaires.

听听Puhemies. 鈥� Keskustelu on p盲盲ttynyt.

Kirjalliset lausumat (171 artikla)

听听Alicia Homs Ginel (S&D), por escrito. 鈥� El cambio clim谩tico tiene un impacto directo y perjudicial en la salud y la seguridad de los trabajadores y trabajadoras y las condiciones de trabajo. La intensificaci贸n de los fen贸menos meteorol贸gicos extremos provocar谩 m谩s lesiones f铆sicas y tambi茅n puede aumentar el riesgo de c谩ncer de piel, exposici贸n al polvo y riesgos psicosociales. Trabajadores al aire libre en sectores como la agricultura, la silvicultura, la construcci贸n y el turismo, o trabajadores del sector sanitario y de emergencias, que desempe帽an un papel fundamental en la preparaci贸n y respuesta ante emergencias, como los bomberos y las enfermeras, est谩n ya particularmente expuestos a la crisis clim谩tica.

La Comisi贸n Europea debe establecer un mecanismo de alerta temprana dentro de la estructura interinstitucional actual para detectar d贸nde se necesitan ajustes y revisiones de las directivas sobre salud y seguridad en el trabajo existentes. Asimismo, la Comisi贸n debe convertir la Recomendaci贸n de 2003 relativa a la lista europea de enfermedades profesionales, ya obsoleta, en una Directiva que cree una lista m铆nima de enfermedades profesionales y establezca los requisitos m铆nimos para su reconocimiento y una compensaci贸n adecuada para las personas afectadas.

听听Puhemies. 鈥� Esityslistalla on seuraavana Giuliano Pisapian mietinn枚n lyhyt esittely: EU:n perussopimuksiin sis盲ltyvien siirtym盲lausekkeiden t盲yt盲nt枚枚npano [] (A9-0208/2023).

Annan puheenvuoron esittelij盲lle nelj盲ksi minuutiksi.

听听Giuliano Pisapia, relatore. 鈥� Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, come tutti sappiamo l'unanimit脿 del voto in Consiglio, pensata come regola per rafforzare l'unit脿 tra gli Stati membri, 猫 diventata sempre di pi霉 causa di ritardi e compromessi al ribasso.

Dai negoziati sul fondo per la ripresa ai ritardi sull'approvazione delle sanzioni contro la Russia, il veto di singoli paesi ha rallentato, e talvolta indebolito, le capacit脿 dell'Unione europea di reagire in tempi brevi alle crisi pi霉 importanti dei nostri tempi.

Troppo spesso decisioni su temi importanti, basti pensare alla salute, allo sviluppo, al contrasto alla fame nel mondo, allo Stato di diritto, sono state bloccate e/o ritardate per la mancanza delle firme di un solo Paese. L'unanimit脿 rischia di essere, sempre pi霉, non pi霉 elemento di garanzia e per questo va ripensata.

脠 giunto il momento di aprire il cantiere di modifica dei trattati. Sappiamo perfettamente che prima di entrare in vigore passeranno anni per le possibili modifiche dei trattati. Le clausole passerella sono uno strumento, forse l'unico strumento, che ci permetterebbe di superare l'unanimit脿 in maniera evidentemente graduale e solamente in alcuni settori politici, ma strategici.

Negli ultimi dieci anni il Parlamento europeo ha approvato oltre 40 risoluzioni a larghissima maggioranza in cui ha chiesto l'attivazione di questo strumento; la Commissione europea si 猫 espressa pi霉 volte a favore del loro utilizzo; di recente un numero importante di Stati membri ha chiesto che venissero attivate, almeno in alcune decisioni di politica estera e anche forse fiscale. Nonostante questo impegno trasversale, le clausole passerella sono state attivate una sola volta nel 2004.

Il problema che bisogna superare 猫 che le cause passerella, per essere attivate, devono avere ancora una volta l'unanimit脿 del Consiglio, il paradosso di utilizzare "l'unanimit脿 per superare l'unanimit脿" pu貌 essere superato solo dai governi degli Stati membri e questo non 猫 pi霉 attuabile.

Il Parlamento europeo domani voter脿 una risoluzione ambiziosa ma importante, che prevede un calendario graduale, perch茅 siamo convinti che ci voglia la gradualit脿 su un tema cos矛 delicato e dettagliato per l'attivazione delle clausole passerella nei prossimi anni.

Proprio per questo speriamo e crediamo nella Presidenza spagnola, sulla base anche delle proposte che emergeranno domani dal Parlamento europeo, per avviare un dialogo e un percorso con gli Stati membri e le altre istituzioni.

Attivare le clausole passerella in determinati settori pi霉 urgenti tra cui, ad esempio, in questo momento, purtroppo, la decisione sulla guerra in Ucraina, l'attuazione del green deal e tante altre, sarebbe un piccolo ma importante passo in avanti nel processo di integrazione europea e consentirebbe all'Europa di reagire sempre pi霉 efficacemente alle grandi sfide che stiamo affrontando e che affronteremo in futuro.

Per questo chiediamo al Consiglio europeo di ascoltare non solo noi, il Parlamento, che pure 猫 importante e determinante, ma soprattutto di ascoltare i cittadini europei che, lo ricordo, nel corso della Conferenza sul futuro dell'Europa hanno espresso la volont脿 di rendere l'Europa pi霉 forte, unita, celere ed efficiente e di superare una volta per tutte la regola dell'unanimit脿.

Attivare le clausole passerella prima della fine di questo mandato, almeno in alcuni settori, almeno provarci, utilizzarle almeno una volta, sarebbe un bel segnale non solo per le prossime elezioni europee, ma anche e soprattutto per il processo di integrazione europea e la credibilit脿 dell'Unione europea.

Pyynn枚st盲 my枚nnett盲v盲t puheenvuorot

听听Juan Fernando L贸pez Aguilar (S&D). 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, comisario Schmit, no ha sido solamente la Conferencia sobre el Futuro de Europa, cuando se ha escuchado a la ciudadan铆a, sino que tambi茅n este Parlamento Europeo se ha rebelado, una y otra vez, contra la unanimidad que deriva en bloqueo no solamente de decisiones cruciales, sino de legislaci贸n europea, como es el caso penoso de la Directiva contra la discriminaci贸n, la llamada Directiva horizontal contra toda forma de discriminaci贸n.

Por eso, tiene pleno sentido este informe que propone, por fin, utilizar la cl谩usula pasarela, que, por lo menos, permite pasar de la unanimidad a la mayor铆a cualificada y, consiguientemente, al procedimiento legislativo ordinario. El primer paso es el marco financiero plurianual. El segundo paso: la pol铆tica exterior de seguridad y de defensa com煤n, que no puede estar bloqueada por la regla de la unanimidad. Despu茅s, los recursos propios fundamentales para que la Uni贸n Europea pueda honrar las ambiciones que proclama y, finalmente, la legislaci贸n antidiscriminaci贸n y, por supuesto, la legislaci贸n que afecta a la democracia y a la calidad de la democracia en la Uni贸n Europea, incluido el sistema electoral, que se va a debatir en este mismo Pleno del Parlamento Europeo.

Tiene pleno sentido: cl谩usula pasarela para evitar la unanimidad.

(Pyynn枚st盲 my枚nnett盲v盲t puheenvuorot p盲盲ttyv盲t)

听听Nicolas Schmit, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, honourable Members, I want to assure you the Commission remains and will always be on the side of those who advocate for a Union working at its best: acting swiftly and delivering efficiently 鈥� all of this in the general interest of EU citizens. This is our raison d鈥櫭猼re, as was recalled to us all at the occasion of the Conference on the Future of Europe.

In her State of the Union speech following the conclusion of the conference, President von der Leyen underlined that the Commission will always side with those who want to improve the way we do things and the way we decide things. Therefore, I would like to thank the rapporteur, Mr听Pisapia, for his excellent work and the report presented today.

Time commands us: climate change, pandemics, Russia鈥檚 invasion of Ukraine, the rising of energy costs 鈥� the list of events that we have had to face has become longer and longer over the past years, and they dictate us urgent responses. The EU institutions have, however, proved to be extremely resilient so far. We have found ways to tackle these challenges within the boundaries of the current Treaties 鈥� from NextGenerationEU to REPowerEU or ASAP.

But, as you point out rightly, there is still untapped potential in the Treaties. And here the position of the Commission on moving from unanimity to qualified majority voting is long-standing, consistent and well known.

Back in 2018 and 2019, the Commission made recommendations to activate the passerelle clauses to boost our capacities for action in key domains, and the four communications contained proposals for the activation of passerelle clauses for foreign and security policy, tax policy, energy and climate policy and social policy. In her political guidelines, President von der Leyen called to move toward full codecision power for 合法博彩网站 and away from unanimity.

Again, in June last year, in our communication following up on the Conference on the Future of Europe, we reiterated our call to use the passerelle clauses to move to qualified majority voting in these areas I just mentioned. And especially when talking about common foreign and security policies, we need to go away from unanimity, especially when we have to decide on sanctions and human rights.

Honourable Members, you have an ally in the European Commission but you know perfectly well that the decision lies first with the Member States. And it is true what you have said: you can only activate the passerelle by unanimity. So abolish, in a way, unanimity through unanimity. This is the problem, and you know it.

But again, let me thank you, especially Mr听Pisapia, for this fruitful contribution, at a very timely moment, to the ongoing discussions in the EU institutions on how the EU can work and decide better and more effectively, especially when speed and rapid action are absolutely needed.

听听Puhemies. 鈥� Kohdan k盲sittely on p盲盲ttynyt.

脛盲nestys toimitetaan huomenna tiistaina 11. hein盲kuuta 2023.

Kirjalliset lausumat (171 artikla)

听听L谩szl贸 Tr贸cs谩nyi (NI), 铆谤谩蝉产补苍. 鈥� Az Eur贸pai Uni贸ban a d枚nt茅shozatali mechanizmust az alap铆t贸 szerz艖d茅sekben r枚gz铆tett茅k a tag谩llamok. Ezek az elj谩r谩sok alapos t谩rgyal谩sok, m茅rlegel茅s eredm茅nyek茅nt j枚ttek l茅tre, k茅nyes egyens煤lyt kialak铆tva a tag谩llamok 茅s az uni贸s int茅zm茅nyek k枚z枚tt. A tag谩llamok a szerz艖d茅sek urai, 艖k d枚ntenek arr贸l, hogy alkotm谩nyaikkal 枚sszhangban szuverenit谩suk mely r茅sz茅t gyakorolhatja 茅s pontosan milyen ter眉leteken az Eur贸pai Uni贸. Az egyhang煤 d枚nt茅shozatal fenntart谩sa, a min艖s铆tett t枚bbs茅g疟 d枚nt茅shozatalra val贸 谩tt茅r茅s elvet茅se bizonyos, strat茅giailag fontos ter眉leteken, l茅nyegi okokb贸l ker眉lt r枚gz铆t茅sre a szerz艖d茅sekben.

Nem a k枚z枚s uni贸s d枚nt茅s akad谩lyoz谩s谩r贸l van sz贸, hanem a d枚nt茅shozatali folyamat term茅szetes r茅sz茅t k茅pezi. A konszenzus azt szolg谩lja, hogy kulcsfontoss谩g煤 ter眉leteken a tag谩llamok egys茅ges 谩ll谩spontot k茅pviseljenek, mindenki hozz谩j谩rul谩s谩t adja a d枚nt茅shez 茅s 铆gy az jelent艖sebb s煤lyt is k茅pviseljen. Az egyhang煤s谩g tov谩bb谩 k眉l枚n枚sen a kis 茅s k枚zepes tag谩llamok nemzeti 茅rdekeinek v茅delm茅茅rt is sz眉ks茅ges, a nagyobb tag谩llamok dominanci谩ra val贸 t枚rekv茅s茅t ellens煤lyozza. Tov谩bbi, szorosabb egy眉ttm疟k枚d茅si form谩kra a szerz艖d茅sek lehet艖s茅get biztos铆tanak, 铆gy p茅ld谩ul meger艖s铆tett egy眉ttm疟k枚d茅sre.

Ilyen van hat谩lyban a h谩zass谩g felbont谩s谩ra alkalmazand贸 jog, a szabadalmak 茅s p茅nz眉gyi tranzakci贸s ad贸 ter眉let茅n, valamint az Eur贸pai 脺gy茅szs茅g l茅trehoz谩sa, s艖t, az eur贸 bevezet茅se is meger艖s铆tett egy眉ttm疟k枚d茅ssel t枚rt茅nt. Mindezeket figyelembe v茅ve a jelent茅s t茅ves megk枚zel铆t茅sen alapul. Mind枚ssze p贸tcselekv茅s, hiszen kiz谩r贸lag a tag谩llamok egyhang煤 d枚nt茅s茅vel lehetne 煤jabb ter眉leteken 谩tt茅rni min艖s铆tett t枚bbs茅ggel val贸 d枚nt茅shozatalra.

听听Puhemies. 鈥� Esityslistalla on seuraavana Kira Marie Peter-Hansenin mietinn枚n lyhyt esittely: Pankkiunioni 鈥� vuosikertomus 2022 [] (A9-0177/2023).

Annan puheenvuoron esittelij盲lle nelj盲ksi minuutiksi.

听听Kira Marie Peter-Hansen, rapporteur. 鈥� Madam President, I think it is clear to all of us that even though the Banking Union is important, it might not be as interesting as, for example, the Nature Restoration Law. But I鈥檓 very happy to see the Commissioner and the Chair and greet them, because the last year has further shown the value of the Banking Union, while also calling for our collective efforts to continue in building a framework that fosters trust, transparency and accountability in the banking sector. Therefore I am also a proud rapporteur of the annual report on the Banking Union, which this year seems especially relevant, with two elements giving flavour to the report.

First of all, the failure of three US banks reminded us of how important it is to implement a sound prudential framework, and the EP report stresses that the EU should fairly, timely and comprehensively implement the internationally agreed standards. The recent political agreement reached with the Council will allow for this timely implementation. The management of these failures also demonstrates the need to have a robust deposit insurance framework that fosters depositors鈥� confidence to avoid bank runs.

Secondly, the Commission published its proposal to revise the EU crisis management framework for banks, and everyone agrees that the EU resolution framework contains some loopholes that we need to fix. The management of Credit Suisse鈥檚 failure also demonstrates the importance of having a credible resolution framework. Fifteen years after the great financial crisis, it is time to put an end to the 鈥榯oo big to fail鈥� issue. Obviously resolution aspects and deposit insurances go hand in hand, and I do hope that the co-legislators will now be able to agree on a comprehensive and coherent reform of the EU framework.

I am particularly proud that 合法博彩网站 reiterates its commitment to complete the Banking Union against this background, and I would like in this context to also thank all the shadow rapporteurs for their constructive contribution and for the smooth work to draft the report that I hope will be voted with a broad majority.

This year鈥檚 annual report also considers the economic and social impact of the Russian aggression on Ukraine and calls on competent authorities to carefully monitor ongoing developments. The report also acknowledges the decreasing trends of non-performing loans in bank balance sheets, while stressing that risk reduction in bank balance sheets should continue. So far, the progressive withdrawal of the public support measures adopted during the pandemic, as well as the rising interest rates environment, have not led to an increase of non-performing loans in bank balance sheets. However, our report stresses that we should continue to closely monitor the situation and continue the progress made in the reduction of risks in the balance sheets.

The report also acknowledges the banking sector鈥檚 role in financing the green transition. There is a clear recognition by 合法博彩网站 that climate change poses a threat to financial stability and it is now time that the financial and prudential framework fully embeds this reality.

Our report also deplores the lack of gender balance in top management positions, both in banks and in EU financial institutions. Gender鈥攂alanced boards are not only a matter of social justice: numerous studies have shown that the gender balance on boards and the workforce brings both societal and economic returns.

All in all, I truly believe that we have achieved an ambitious report which advocates for the deepening of our economic integration and the completion of the Banking Union. And finally, I will switch into Danish.

For til sidst vil jeg gerne appellere til mit eget land, Danmark, om at tiltr忙de bankunionen og dermed slutte flere 氓rs n酶leri. Ved at tiltr忙de bankunionen vil Danmark b氓de styrke sin egen finansielle stabilitet og det europ忙iske samarbejde inden for den finansielle sektor. Et dansk medlemskab vil ogs氓 give os langt mere indflydelse p氓 EU-lovgivning, der p氓virker den danske finanssektor. Fordelene ved et dansk medlemskab af bankunionen er veldokumenteret. S氓 er det bare om at komme i gang.

VORSITZ: NICOLA BEER
痴颈锄别辫谤盲蝉颈诲别苍迟颈苍

Spontane Wortmeldungen

听听Billy Kelleher (Renew). 鈥� Madam President, we must continue to ensure the Banking Union and the Capital Markets Union are a priority of this Commission and the 合法博彩网站 and the Council. And as we see interest rate rises across Europe, we have to ensure that we have mechanisms in place to give confidence to consumers and those that have deposits in banks. We also need to put a macro鈥攑rudential framework in place to ensure that there is proper oversight of our banking system, but equally that we have competition across the entire European Union when it comes to provision of services to our banking industry.

At the moment we have a very sheltered industry in many countries. Particularly from the point of view of Ireland itself, we have two major banks and then after that it is very, very challenging. So we do need to see more competition coming into the marketplace for consumers across the European Union.

So Commissioner I would urge you to continue on the path that you are progressing with regard to the Banking Union, and also from the Capital Markets Union perspective, to ensure that we have adequate capital to fund the Green Deal and in the meantime to ensure customers have a competitive advantage in ensuring they can shop around to get the best interest rates and loan approvals possible, particularly in Ireland due to our sheltered banking system at the moment.

(Ende der spontanen Wortmeldungen)

听听Mairead McGuinness, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, vielen Dank and good evening. This is a rather special debate. My thanks to the select few who have contributed two excellent contributions. It is about quality, not volume.

Can I just say thank you to rapporteur Peter鈥擧ansen in particular, for her comment about nature restoration and the banking debate. In fact, we need the Banking Union and Capital Markets Union in order to provide the investment needed for nature restoration and the climate challenge. So while there aren鈥檛 many here, I think it is important for us to state very clearly that the work you鈥檝e done on this report, which is excellent, with the shadows, is very important 鈥� and not to the financial system alone; this is about the economy and society. We need to say that very loud and very clear indeed.

What I鈥檇 love is during the European election campaigns of 2024, the people would ask us about the Banking Union and the Capital Markets Union. I live in hope, and I think, Madam rapporteur your words should encourage people to do that.

So you know the Commission鈥檚 position on the Banking Union, we know that we need to develop and strengthen and it is a work in progress. The good news on one part is that the Council and 合法博彩网站 recently agreed to the final implementation of the Basel international banking standards in the EU. This is really welcome as it is a major contribution to the single rulebook. After 15 years we are turning the page on the post鈥攆inancial crisis reforms and we can look to the future. But we still have this unfinished business with the Banking Union, and that鈥檚 why this debate is important.

You rightly say, Madam Rapporteur, that we recently adopted the proposal for crisis management and deposit insurance (CMDI) back in April. It is an important reform and will help to address some of the challenges with how the rules are working in practice. It builds on the experience we gathered on the ground since 2014 and addresses many of the observations you make in your report. The review offered a good opportunity to look at what worked well and indeed what didn鈥檛 work so well.

The goal of the reform is to ensure a more consistent approach to managing bank failures in the European Union, because we want to make sure that any bank can exit the market smoothly, regardless of its size or business model or location. This reform will strengthen financial stability, protect taxpayers and improve the confidence of depositors across the European Union. But most importantly, this reform is also intended to build new momentum, to relaunch discussions on completing the Banking Union.

As you rightly point out in your report, the CMDI Review is not, and should not be, a substitute for completing the Banking Union. The big missing element remains a European deposit insurance scheme (EDIS). EU citizens should be able to open a bank account wherever they are in the EU with the same level of protection. If we want every euro deposited anywhere in the Banking Union to have the same value, then we need to give it the same level of protection through a common deposit insurance scheme. A common European safety net will deliver more resilience to the system more efficiently, and it will make national schemes less vulnerable to large, local or systemic shocks. This will pave the way for deeper market integration 鈥� and that鈥檚 critical for growth and resilience 鈥� as well as allowing the banking sector to better compete internationally.

There are different design options for EDIS and we acknowledge them in our communication. Alongside the crisis management proposals, we must continue working to finalise a more resilient and integrated Banking Union. I am confident that the CMDI proposal will pave the path for EDIS and that it will help us make a fully鈥攆ledged Banking Union a reality. But I really cannot say this strongly enough: we need the Banking Union. It will help the EU banking sector not only to weather geopolitical and financial turmoil, but also to boost its profitability and competitiveness. Again, it will help finance the green and digital transitions. It will make sure that our safety nets are effective and that enough funding is available to handle failing banks across the Banking Union in times of crisis. Last but not least, it will benefit European citizens because depositor confidence is a public good and we are responsible for protecting it.

So I encourage the European 合法博彩网站 to remain ambitious on these files and I look forward to continuing to work with you on completing the Banking Union.

听听President. 鈥� Thank you very much that you were here so late in the evening. We will then switch to Commissioner Schmit for the next debate, but so far this debate is closed and the vote will be tomorrow.

听听Die Pr盲sidentin. 鈥� Als n盲chster Punkt der Tagesordnung folgt die kurze Darstellung des Berichts von Anna Zalewska 眉ber die F枚rderung und Gestaltung der Berufsbildung als Instrument f眉r den Erfolg der Arbeitnehmer und als Baustein f眉r die Wirtschaft der EU in der neuen Industrie 4.0 () (A9-0232/2023).

听听Anna Zalewska, Sprawozdawczyni. 鈥� Pani Przewodnicz膮ca! Panie Komisarzu! Sp臋dza Pan z nami dzisiaj bardzo pracowity wiecz贸r. To rzeczywi艣cie du偶a satysfakcja, 偶e w Europejskim Roku Umiej臋tno艣ci chcemy przyj膮膰 sprawozdanie o kompetencjach 4.0. Zanim b臋d臋 m贸wi艂a o sprawozdaniu, chc臋 podzi臋kowa膰 kompetentnym, posiadaj膮cym ogromne umiej臋tno艣ci kole偶ankom i kolegom sprawozdawcom cieniom, jak r贸wnie偶 ich doradcom, bo rzeczywi艣cie rozumieli艣my si臋 w lot, dogadywali艣my si臋 przy ka偶dym kompromisie czy poprawce. Rzeczywi艣cie 艣wiat zmienia si臋 w tempie, nad kt贸rym nie mo偶emy przej艣膰 do porz膮dku dziennego. Musimy sprosta膰 wyzwaniom. To 艣wiat 4.0. Pewnie za moment b臋dzie 5.0.

Potrzebujemy nowych kompetencji, tych kompetencji, kt贸re potrzebne s膮 przede wszystkim w 艣wiecie cyfrowym, bo to ju偶 nie tylko te podstawowe umiej臋tno艣ci, ale te偶 te zwi膮zane z zarz膮dzaniem, programowaniem, analizowaniem, prezentacj膮, jak r贸wnie偶 umiej臋tno艣ci wymuszane przez inny spos贸b funkcjonowania, edukacji czy pracy. I inaczej wygl膮daj膮 stosunki personalne, interpersonalne, spo艂eczne, istniej膮 zupe艂nie inne potrzeby organizacyjne, ale oczywi艣cie o wszystkim tym pami臋tamy, bo wyznaczali艣my te偶 i trendy, i potrzeby, kt贸re s膮 konieczne do zrealizowania, a nie tylko diagnozowali艣my sytuacj臋. Pokazywali艣my, 偶e konieczne jest, aby firma by艂a w szkole, szko艂a w firmie, 偶eby indywidualizowa膰 przez ca艂e 偶ycie r贸偶ne 艣cie偶ki doskonalenia, 偶eby wspiera膰 pokolenia, 偶eby mentor m贸g艂 uczy膰 i pokazywa膰 i wychowywa膰 nowego pracownika.

Podkre艣lali艣my r贸wnie偶 w sprawozdaniu, 偶e wa偶ne jest, 偶eby promowa膰 firmy, kt贸re potrafi膮 w taki spos贸b edukowa膰 swoich pracownik贸w, dawa膰 im satysfakcj臋, uznawa膰, 偶e s膮 z nimi ca艂y czas. To zreszt膮 dla swojego w艂asnego dobra i dobra rynku i konkurencyjno艣ci. A z drugiej strony, 偶eby szko艂a, edukacja zrozumia艂a, 偶e w firma mo偶e by膰 w艂a艣ciwie online, 偶e razem powinni si臋 kszta艂ci膰 i razem powinni przygotowywa膰 pracownika do rynku pracy.

Jednocze艣nie podkre艣lali艣my, 偶e promocja firmy, kt贸ra potrafi wspiera膰 pracownika, ma takie kompetencje, 偶eby posiada艂 wszystko to, czego potrzebuje rynek 4.0, 偶e te偶 firma taka powinna by膰 promowana, te偶 powinna funkcjonowa膰 jako wz贸r, jako przyk艂ad do na艣ladowania. Oczywi艣cie wszystko to zostawiamy pa艅stwom cz艂onkowskim, bo to s膮 ich kompetencje.

Na ko艅cu mog臋 tylko powiedzie膰, 偶e tak膮 form膮 promocji s膮 w tym roku Euro Skillsy, i zapraszam wszystkich serdecznie: odbywaj膮 si臋 w Polsce, w Gda艅sku, w pierwszym tygodniu wrze艣nia. Mam nadziej臋, 偶e b臋d膮 Pa艅stwo 艣ledzi膰, jak ci, kt贸rzy rozwijaj膮 swoje kompetencje, jak ci, kt贸rzy promuj膮 szkolnictwo zawodowe, bran偶owe b臋d膮 ze sob膮 rywalizowa膰. Jeszcze raz dzi臋kuj臋 za doskona艂膮 prac臋.

Spontane Wortmeldungen

听听Stanislav Pol膷谩k (PPE). 鈥� Pan铆 p艡edsedaj铆c铆, j谩 tento bod dne拧n铆 rozpravy velmi v铆t谩m. V铆t谩m zpr谩vu kolegyn臎 Zalewsk茅, proto啪e Evropsk媒 rok kvalifikac铆 ukazuje, co je na拧铆 nejz谩sadn臎j拧铆 v媒zvou, co p艡edstavuje nejv臎t拧铆 v媒zvu pro budouc铆 obdob铆, a to je ot谩zka pr谩v臎 rozvoje kvalifikace na拧ich zam臎stnanc暖.

Na t茅 zpr谩v臎 je mimo jin茅 zaj铆mav茅, 啪e do roku 2030 bude 40 % Evropan暖 啪铆t v regionech, kde bude doch谩zet k 煤bytku pracovn铆ch m铆st. To znamen谩, je evidentn铆, 啪e nejv臎t拧铆 v媒zvu p艡edstavuj铆 kompetence, celo啪ivotn铆 vzd臎l谩v谩n铆. A nejen pro t茅ma Pr暖mysl 4.0, p艡ijde dal拧铆 t茅ma Pr暖mysl 5.0.

My evidentn臎 budeme pot艡ebovat ka啪d茅ho v pracovn铆m procesu a nikdo nebude moct b媒t opomenut pr谩v臎 ve vzd臎l谩v谩n铆, b媒t diskriminov谩n v p艡铆stupu ke vzd臎l谩v谩n铆. To jsou velk茅 v媒zvy a jsem r谩d, 啪e se tomu skute膷n臎 v臎nujeme. Nejv臎t拧铆 v媒zvou pro na拧i budoucnost je skute膷n臎 u膷it se.