合法博彩网站

听听笔谤别艧别诲颈苍迟别. 鈥� Urm膬torul punct de pe ordinea de zi este Declara葲ia Comisiei 鈥� Interferen葲e str膬ine 葯i acte de spionaj ale unor actori din 葲膬ri ter葲e 卯n universit膬葲ile europene. []

听听Helena Dalli, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Mr President and honourable Members, I thank you for this opportunity to discuss such a crucial topic for our sovereignty, security and values. The presence of third鈥慶ountry nationals, whether staff or students, within Europe's universities, is substantial and well embedded in our practices. These students and staff are of course very welcome in Europe. International diversity brings an important added value for the institutions themselves, and foreign students, upon completing their degrees, could become part of a highly attractive workforce for Europe.

The EU actively encourages a cross鈥慴order dimension in academic activities and is currently revitalising the way it supports this through the European strategy for universities, the European Universities Alliance, the proposed blueprint for a European degree and, of course, through the Erasmus+ programme, which has an increasingly international dimension.

So academia in Europe has openness and borderless cooperation in its DNA, and this is its great advantage, but it is also a vulnerability. Therefore, we need to strike the right balance between being open and being prudent. We need to be aware of existing risks and address them. The Commission remains vigilant about activities conducted by or on behalf of foreign actors that involve coercion, concealment, deception or corruption, and that are contrary to the EU's sovereignty, values and interests. Our priority is to protect our fundamental values by ensuring that universities remain a free and safe space for knowledge creation and exchange. To this end, we have taken important steps in several areas.

First, on foreign interference in research and innovation, our commitment to tackle this is clearly embedded in our 2021 global approach to research and innovation and is a priority action of the ERA policy agenda for 2022鈥�2024. Moreover, in 2022, our staff working document on tackling foreign interference provided universities with a practical guidance on how to enhance the security of their research and innovation activities, while maintaining an open research environment.

Since we know that universities cannot confront this threat alone, last year we launched a mutual learning exercise involving 12 Member States whose findings will benefit our entire Union. In addition, we are developing a one鈥憇top platform for higher education institutions and researchers. This will be a user鈥慺riendly online dashboard consolidating all available tools and resources on foreign interference in research and innovation.

On research security, the Council recommendation on enhancing research security, adopted in May 2024, provides a robust basis for cooperation with the Member States, the funding organisations and researchers. Our approach is based on self-governance, on the principle that with academic freedom comes academic responsibility. This is, of course, combined with the support and the crucial guidance by public authorities. Where sensitive technologies are concerned, we need to exercise caution, of course.

The recommendation advocates protecting research organisations from foreign interference, looking also at coercion of diaspora by the state of origin and other forms of malign influence. These are factors that could lead to self-censorship and security risks for foreign researchers, doctoral candidates and students. Furthermore, the defence of democracy package adopted in December of last year ensures, through a specific directive, that where research is used as a channel to represent the interests of a third鈥慶ountry government, this is done in full transparency and upholding democratic accountability.

When it comes to cyberattacks and espionage, the recommendation recognises the sophisticated forms of critical knowledge and technology transfer. While our intelligence has an obvious role to play, our universities and researchers can help combat espionage by raising awareness and fostering a strong security culture and cyber鈥慼ygiene. Universities should take measures to prevent third鈥慶ountry actors from taking advantage of international academic cooperation, seemingly carried out in good faith. We should not be naive. While some forms of cooperation may not be legally prohibited, they can still be clearly undesirable.

The Commission is actively working to follow up on these objectives with concrete actions in the mandate ahead. For example, in line with the Council recommendation on enhancing research security, we will establish a European Centre of Expertise on Research Security, contributing to creating an EU鈥憌ide community of practice and maintaining a structural dialogue with stakeholder organisations and developing tools to support research鈥憄erforming organisations to perform due diligence into prospective partners.

The EU is a staunch defender of academic freedom, freedom of scientific research and the autonomy of institutions, which is the third area where we are taking important steps while tackling foreign interference, we must remain firm in upholding fundamental values like institutional autonomy and academic freedom. This is why, as we take measures to counter these threats, we must also pursue initiatives to protect and promote the freedom of scientific research.

In this respect, I welcome the European 合法博彩网站 resolution on promoting and protecting the freedom of scientific research in Europe, adopted earlier this year. In support of a potential proposal, the Commission launched a study in September to collect all the necessary evidence. The study will analyse existing relevant legal frameworks within and beyond the EU, gathering input from key stakeholders to better understand the current state of scientific research freedom. It will also build on initiatives such as the European 合法博彩网站 Academic Freedom Monitor and the Academic Freedom Index.

听听Zolt谩n Tarr, a PPE k茅pvisel艖csoport nev茅ben. 鈥� Tisztelt Eln枚k 脷r! Az akad茅miai szabads谩g Eur贸pa 茅s egyben Magyarorsz谩g kultur谩lis 枚r枚ks茅g茅nek szerves r茅sze. Ezt az 枚r枚ks茅get a t枚rt茅nelem folyam谩n ugyanakkor mindig is t谩madt谩k Eur贸pa ellens茅gei. Azt kell sajnos mondjam, hogy ma Magyarorsz谩gon ez a t谩mad谩s a jelenlegi populista korm谩nyt贸l 茅rkezik els艖sorban az akad茅miai szabads谩ggal szemben.

A tudom谩nyos 茅let hazai politikai befoly谩sol谩sa mellett a harmadik orsz谩gok k茅mked茅se is rendk铆v眉l komoly fenyeget茅s. Egyes korm谩nyok, mint p茅ld谩ul a jelenlegi magyar korm谩ny is, nemcsak hogy nem v茅dekeznek az ilyen k茅mked茅s ellen, hanem m茅g el艖 is seg铆tik oda nem figyel茅s眉kkel, s艖t olykor akt铆v k枚zrem疟k枚d茅s眉kkel. A jelenlegi korm谩ny K铆na-bar谩t politik谩ja s煤lyosb铆tja a helyzetet.

Ennek egyik p茅ld谩ja, hogy a k铆nai Fudan Egyetem budapesti projektet ind铆tott, amely val贸di beavatkoz谩st 茅s biztons谩gi kock谩zatot jelent. Nem az oktat谩sr贸l sz贸l, hanem K铆na befoly谩sszerz茅s茅t szolg谩lja. Kedves Mindny谩jan! Ez nem csup谩n Magyarorsz谩g probl茅m谩ja, hanem egy 枚sszeur贸pai kih铆v谩s. Eur贸pa szuverenit谩sa, versenyk茅pess茅ge 茅s kutat谩s-fejleszt茅si teljes铆tm茅nye m煤lik azon, hogy megakad谩lyozzuk a rosszindulat煤 cselekm茅nyeket az akad茅miai szf茅r谩ban is.

Ha egy tag谩llam korm谩nya, mint p茅ld谩ul Magyarorsz谩g k眉lf枚ldi 茅rdekeket szolg谩l ki, az az eg茅sz Uni贸t sebezhet艖v茅 teszi. Ez茅rt 眉dv枚z枚lj眉k, s眉rgetj眉k 茅s t谩mogatjuk az Eur贸pai Kutat谩sbiztons谩gi Szak茅rt艖i K枚zpont l茅trehoz谩s谩t, amely strat茅giai seg铆ts茅get fog tudni ny煤jtani a kutat贸int茅zetek 茅s egyetemek v茅delm茅ben, az akad茅miai szabads谩g v茅delme 茅s a kutat谩sok biztons谩g谩nak garant谩l谩sa 茅rdek茅ben. S眉rgetj眉k, hogy az EU miel艖bb konkr茅tan int茅zkedjen!

听听Hannes Heide, im Namen der S&D-Fraktion. 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, Frau Kommissarin! Die akademische Freiheit ist unverzichtbarer Grundwert der Demokratie. Sie garantiert das Recht zu forschen, zu lehren und Wissen zu hinterfragen, ohne Furcht vor jedweder Zensur oder Beeinflussung. Dieses Prinzip ist zunehmend von Akteuren aus Drittstaaten bedroht. Autorit盲re Regime versuchen, in die Forschung einzugreifen, Lehrpl盲ne zu beeinflussen und Ideen zu unterdr眉cken, die ihren politischen oder ideologischen Interessen widersprechen. China finanziert europ盲ische Forscherinnen und Forscher in strategischen Bereichen wie k眉nstlicher Intelligenz, Quantentechnologie, Weltraumforschung oder Biotechnologie. Chinesische Forscher sind per Geheimdienstgesetz verpflichtet, ihr Wissen mit dem Staat zu teilen.

Eine strengere Pr眉fung und mehr Transparenz bei der Finanzierung von Forschungsprojekten sind daher dringend notwendig. Jede finanzielle Unterst眉tzung von Drittstaaten oder externen Organisationen muss offengelegt, m枚gliche Einflussnahme gepr眉ft werden, um die Unabh盲ngigkeit der europ盲ischen Forschung zu garantieren. Wir sind verpflichtet, alles daf眉r zu tun, dass die akademische Forschung in Europa frei und unabh盲ngig bleibt.

听听Ant贸nio T芒nger Corr锚a, on behalf of the PfE Group. 鈥� Mr听President,听Madam听Commissioner, today we address a real threat to European sovereignty: foreign interference and espionage in our universities carried out by countries like China, Russia and Iran to acquire strategic and sensitive knowledge.

Recent cases have highlighted this problem, such as academic partnerships in our countries that have resulted in access to sensitive technologies in fields like artificial intelligence, biotechnology and cybersecurity. A study by the European Union Institute for Security Studies itself has revealed how authoritarian regimes use universities to infiltrate and influence networks, collect sensitive data, and even recruit agents. These actions go beyond the academic espionage, they represent a direct threat to our security and sovereignty.

We need to act now. I propose concrete measures. One: strengthen security in EU-funded projects with righteous audits and vetoes on suspicious collaborations. Two: supervise foreign researchers in sensitive fields in coordination with national intelligence services. Three: establish a European list of high-risk foreign institutions, warning universities about potential threats. Four: promote partnerships within the European space and the free world with the countries that share our democratic values.

European universities are pillars of innovation and our independence. Protecting the knowledge generated with them is safeguarding our freedom and the future of Europe.

听听Ma艂gorzata Gosiewska, w imieniu grupy ECR. 鈥� Panie Przewodnicz膮cy! Europejskie uczelnie s膮 infiltrowane przez obce s艂u偶by. To na nich toczy si臋 walka o m艂ode umys艂y, kt贸rym wt艂aczane s膮 szkodliwe lewicowe ideologie, szerzy dezinformacja, budowane jest oddzia艂ywanie na wa偶ne decyzje. Trwa walka o dost臋p do wiedzy, bada艅 naukowych i nowoczesnych rozwi膮za艅. Rosja, Bia艂oru艣 czy Chiny instaluj膮 swoich szpieg贸w w 艣rodowiskach naukowych, by destabilizowa膰 pa艅stwa europejskie. Rosyjska siatka szpiegowska ma dost臋p do danych, kt贸re pomagaj膮 oddzia艂ywa膰 na spo艂ecze艅stwa i instytucje. S膮 na to dowody w Polsce, Estonii czy Wielkiej Brytanii. Przyk艂ad: uczelnia w Siedlcach, wsp贸艂pracuj膮c z Rosj膮 i Bia艂orusi膮, organizowa艂a konferencj臋 na temat stosunk贸w Polska-Rosja, w tym w zakresie bezpiecze艅stwa. Jej rektor, pu艂kownik by艂ych Wojskowych S艂u偶b Informacyjnych, jest promotorem doktoratu szefa S艂u偶by Kontrwywiadu Wojskowego, czyli s艂u偶b odpowiedzialnych za ochron臋 kontrwywiadowcz膮 pa艅stwa polskiego. Walka z cywilizacj膮 zachodni膮 trwa na wielu frontach. Otwarta toczy si臋 w Ukrainie, ta niewidoczna 鈥� poprzez wp艂yw i oddzia艂ywanie. Uniwersytety musz膮 pozosta膰 wolne, ale rol膮 pa艅stwa jest zapewnienie bezpiecze艅stwa w zakresie ochrony my艣li, technologii, jak i wp艂ywu na umys艂y m艂odego pokolenia.

听听Laurence Farreng, au nom du groupe Renew. 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, Madame la Commissaire, chers coll猫gues, il y a un angle mort dans la lutte contre les ing茅rences 茅trang猫res: ce sont nos universit茅s et notre enseignement sup茅rieur. C'est pourquoi j'ai demand茅 la tenue de ce d茅bat avec mon groupe Renew.

Les universit茅s sont au c艙ur de la bataille pour notre recherche et notre comp茅titivit茅 europ茅enne. S'il faut bien s没r continuer 脿 accueillir des 茅tudiants 茅trangers et 脿 d茅fendre la libert茅 acad茅mique, ne soyons pas pour autant na茂fs. Des puissances 茅trang猫res, gouvernements comme entreprises, tentent de capter nos d茅couvertes scientifiques. Elles mettent aussi en place des strat茅gies d'influence agressives via leurs 茅tudiants pour faire passer des messages positifs sur leurs r茅gimes. Parmi elles, la Chine, la Turquie, la Russie ou encore les pays du Golfe. Certains pays europ茅ens sont tr猫s complaisants 脿 leur 茅gard; je pense comme toujours 脿 la Hongrie de Viktor听Orban.

Assumons donc de d茅fendre notre s茅curit茅 acad茅mique et sortons des logiques nationales. Si nous voulons assurer notre souverainet茅 scientifique et technologique dans un monde incertain, adoptons une approche europ茅enne coh茅rente dans l'accueil des 茅tudiants 茅trangers et nos partenariats avec les entreprises et renfor莽ons le renseignement europ茅en.

听听Mark茅ta Gregorov谩, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group. 鈥� Mr President, dear colleagues, the European Union is one of the world's top destinations for university students. We have some of the oldest and best universities in the world, and we produce valuable research and technology that hostile states want. Our geostrategic enemies are going to great lengths to catch up with us and outpace us on key emerging technologies. So I very much welcome the Council's recommendations on how to defend our research.

I agree that we need to urgently identify our most valuable technology sectors and corresponding PhDs, and train them in operational and research security. We should also coordinate this work with European intelligence agencies 鈥� after all, they will often be the first to uncover foreign interference and we should not pretend that this is an actor鈥慳gnostic issue.

China and Russia are our main sources of foreign interference, so while we welcome students with ties to these nations into our universities, we should not be naive and grant easy access to cutting鈥慹dge technology to everyone. We must be vigilant, though not paranoid. The strength of our universities lies not just in their innovation, but also in their openness. Our challenge is to build walls of wisdom that safeguard our research without erecting barriers to the free exchange of ideas, because the future will belong not to those who fear knowledge, but to those who can protect it while sharing it.

听听Milan Uhr铆k, za skupinu ESN. 鈥� V谩啪en媒 p谩n predsedaj煤ci, prep谩膷te, ale m艌a v mene mlad媒ch 木ud铆 a 拧tudentov doslova niekedy ur谩啪a, ke膹 tu nazna膷ujete, 啪e t铆, ktor铆 nie s煤 progres铆vni a d煤hov铆, s煤 de facto pod vplyvom nejak媒ch zahrani膷n媒ch agentov alebo hybridn媒ch oper谩ci铆. Proste nie, mnoho mlad媒ch 木ud铆 m谩 rozum, maj煤 odvahu, nechc煤 铆s钮 so st谩dom, nechc煤 podporova钮 vojnu, nechc煤 sa z煤膷ast艌ova钮 拧kolen铆, kde ich u膷ia, ako spr谩vne oslovova钮 木ud铆 s nejak媒m tret铆m alebo 拧tvrt媒m pohlav铆m. Proste t铆to 木udia maj煤 svoj n谩zor a nepova啪ujem za spr谩vne n谩lepkova钮 ich, 啪e teraz s煤 v拧etci zahrani膷n铆 agenti alebo 啪e s煤 teda ak nie agenti, tak pod vplyvom nejak媒ch zahrani膷n媒ch agentov.

Ove木a v盲膷拧铆m probl茅mom ako nejak铆 zahrani膷n铆 agenti na univerzit谩ch, na 拧kol谩ch je pod木a m么jho n谩zoru p么sobenie mimovl谩dnych organiz谩ci铆, 木avicov媒ch mimovl谩dnych organiz谩ci铆 na 拧kol谩ch, ktor茅 doslova vym媒vaj煤 mozgy mlad媒m 木udom, u膷ia ich nezmysly, u膷ia ich 木avicov煤 propagandu, 木avicov煤 ideol贸giu, ktor谩 je odtrhnut谩 od reality, a nepripravuj煤 ich na re谩lny svet, na skuto膷n茅 hodnoty, ktor茅 tu 木udia skuto膷ne potrebuj煤 na to, aby pre啪ili dobr媒 a spokojn媒 a 拧钮astn媒 啪ivot.

听听Sun膷ana Glavak (PPE). 鈥� Po拧tovani predsjedavaju膰i, po拧tovana povjerenice, kolegice i kolege, rekla bih da ovo nije samo akademsko pitanje. Rije膷 je o politi膷kom i strate拧kom izazovu i svjedo膷imo doista zabrinjavaju膰em trendu gdje strane sile iskori拧tavaju na拧u akademsku otvorenost za, budimo iskreni, recimo: kra膽u intelektualnog vlasni拧tva, podrivanje inovacija i utjecaj na politi膷ki diskurs.

Kroz sveu膷ili拧ta 膷esto se plasiraju ideolo拧ke poruke i politi膷ka propaganda kako bi se utjecalo na mlade intelektualce. Finaciranje odre膽enih programa, predavanja ili studentskih organizacija od strane stranih vlada mo啪e se koristiti i za promoviranje, naravno, prikrivenih interesa. 艩to se ti膷e mladih studenata i istra啪iva膷a, oni su 膷esto i mete za regrutaciju u svrhu prikupljanja podataka, a 膷esto se koriste pristupi poput financijskih poticaja, obe膰anja karijernog napretka ili ideolo拧kog vrbovanja. Posebno su ranjivi studenti sa stipendijama u inozemstvu i oni mogu biti izlo啪eni pritiscima od strane doma膰ih ili stranih aktera.

Ja膷anje suradnje izme膽u sveu膷ili拧ta i obavje拧tajnih slu啪bi nije stvar stvaranja dr啪ava nadzora. Rije膷 je o za拧titi intelektualnih dobara koja pokre膰u na拧a gospodarstva i 拧tite na拧u sigurnost. To zna膷i osigurati da europske inovacije koriste na拧im gra膽anima, a ne stranim akterima. Za vlade, ovo je test predanosti za拧titi na拧ih ljudi, vrijednosti i suvereniteta. Za Europu, ovo je prilika da poka啪e svijetu da akademska otvorenost i sigurnost mogu koegzistirati.

听听Juan Fernando L贸pez Aguilar (S&D). 鈥� Se帽or presidente, se帽ora comisaria Dalli, la libertad acad茅mica no es la libertad de los acad茅micos, sino de los estudiantes, los profesores, los investigadores, al servicio de la innovaci贸n, del conocimiento y, por tanto, del bienestar y del progreso.

Y en mayo de 2023 la Comisi贸n Especial sobre Injerencias Extranjeras en Todos los Procesos Democr谩ticos de la Uni贸n Europea, en particular la Desinformaci贸n 鈥攄e la que tuve el honor de ser parte鈥�, concluy贸 con claridad que tanto la libertad acad茅mica como la investigaci贸n cient铆fica, en 谩mbitos tan sensibles como la neurociencia, las tecnolog铆as cu谩nticas o la investigaci贸n civil y militar, est谩n amenazadas por interferencias extranjeras, notablemente por China, que obliga a todos los investigadores chinos a compartir su conocimiento con el Estado.

Por tanto, es absolutamente imprescindible que, en cumplimiento de las conclusiones de esa comisi贸n especial, la Comisi贸n que viene 鈥攍a Comisi贸n Von der Leyen听II鈥� adopte cuantas iniciativas sean necesarias para proteger la integridad de la investigaci贸n cient铆fica, de la autonom铆a acad茅mica, de la libertad acad茅mica frente a sus enemigos, frente a las interferencias extranjeras que intentan socavar los cimientos del modelo de convivencia europeo.

听听Andr茅 Roug茅 (PfE). 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, la France fait l'objet d'ing茅rences 茅trang猫res dans l'universit茅. En听2021, un rapport de la mission d'information du S茅nat 茅voquait une politique d'influence chinoise agressive dans l'universit茅. Le S茅nat insistait sur l'importance de dispositifs de contr么le et de pr茅vention.

Derri猫re une fa莽ade de coop茅ration, la Chine d茅ploie toute son influence afin de b茅n茅ficier de notre recherche et d茅veloppement et de manipuler l'int茅grit茅 acad茅mique de nos institutions. Cette strat茅gie s'inscrit 脿 la lisi猫re du renseignement et de la politique d'influence. Derri猫re la r茅alit茅 de partenariats acad茅miques entre universit茅s chinoises et europ茅ennes existent des tentatives de contr么ler le discours scientifique europ茅en. Exploitant les porosit茅s de nos syst猫mes universitaires, d'autres puissances, comme l'Azerba茂djan听鈥� qui se livre par ailleurs 脿 un activisme subversif dans la France d'outre-mer听鈥�, la Russie ou certains 脡tats du Golfe emploient des m茅thodes similaires.

Il convient donc de renforcer la transparence sur les financements extra-europ茅ens des universit茅s et de d茅velopper un classement europ茅en des universit茅s respectant les libert茅s acad茅miques, mais aussi d'instaurer des sanctions cr茅dibles contre toute ing茅rence.

L'universit茅 europ茅enne doit rester un sanctuaire du savoir, ouvert aux id茅es et aux innovations du reste du monde. Pr茅servons donc nos universit茅s de dynamiques qui ne participent en rien 脿 l'茅l茅vation des savoirs, mais constituent des jeux d'influences g茅ostrat茅giques qui ne disent pas leur nom.

听听Guillaume Peltier (ECR). 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, Bologne en听1088, Oxford en听1165, Paris en听1200; les universit茅s europ茅ennes ont enseign茅 le monde et 茅duqu茅 l'humanit茅. Elles furent la m猫re de toutes les connaissances, que personne n'avait encore galvaud茅es. De la r茅v茅rence pour les anciens, de l'irr茅v茅rence pour les puissants.

Un combat funeste s'est aujourd'hui empar茅 de nos chaires. Les wokistes veulent d茅coloniser l'Europe, offrant aux islamistes le droit de la recoloniser. Ces noces apparemment contradictoires constituent la nouvelle convergence des luttes, la plus funeste des ing茅rences 茅trang猫res, celle qui apprend aux Europ茅ens 脿 se ha茂r, 脿 rompre les liens g茅n茅alogiques, 脿 devenir des d茅racin茅s.

Les nations vacillent, mais soudain se l猫ve la g茅n茅ration des consciences dress茅es et des anciennes sagesses. Je serai toujours du c么t茅 des p茅rennit茅s fran莽aises, des cloches de nos 茅glises, des calvaires, de nos chemins creux, qui annoncent pour toujours la primaut茅 de notre civilisation.

听听Bart Groothuis (Renew). 鈥� Mr听President, Commissioner, Canada has published a list of universities and institutions which pose a risk to Canada's national security. There is no equivalent list in Europe. The United States work with security clearances before sensitive technology can be exposed to foreign students. In Japan and Australia, risky collaborations with foreign universities are routinely reviewed and can be dissolved at state level.听To these standards, nor to the NIST standards on how to collaborate safely at universities, these are not adapted in Europe.

What we did do in Europe was set up an excellent parliamentary committee to investigate unwanted foreign interference and espionage. Unfortunately, this work was not continued, but much needs to be done. If there is still any doubt after today's debate, we should make clear that we need this committee in the previous mandate to become permanent, to keep pressure on countering foreign interference, monitor our own recommendations, because this threat will not disappear by itself.

听听Vladimir Prebili膷 (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Gospod predsednik! Spo拧tovani! Kot univerzitetni profesor iz prve roke vem, kako klju膷no vlogo ima univerzitetno izobra啪evanje za napredek Evrope. Na拧e univerze so temelj znanja, inovacij in kriti膷nega razmi拧ljanja ter gradnik Evrope, kot jo poznamo danes.

A prav ta odprtost nas hkrati dela ranljive. Ogro啪ajo nas tuji vdori in vohunjenje s strani akterjev iz tretjih dr啪av. Ti izkori拧膷ajo raziskovalne programe, akademske izmenjave in partnerstva ter pogosto ciljajo na ob膷utljiva podro膷ja, kot so umetna inteligenca, biotehnologija in obramboslovje. Njihov cilj ni kraja znanja, temve膷 spodkopavanje na拧ih idej in napredka.

Univerze morajo zato dobiti orodja in se usposobiti za zaznavanje in prepre膷evanje tovrstnih posegov. Zato je bistveno krepiti sodelovanje in povezovanje univerz in jim zato tudi zagotoviti vire. Ne gre le za za拧膷ito na拧ih univerz, temve膷 obrambo evropskih vrednot.

听听Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski (PPE). 鈥� Panie Przewodnicz膮cy! Poruszamy si臋 pomi臋dzy skrajno艣ciami, a to nigdy nie jest dobre. Pomi臋dzy otwarto艣ci膮 i w sumie naiwno艣ci膮, a ewentualn膮 ochron膮 wszystkich naszych interes贸w, w tym oczywi艣cie efekt贸w bada艅 naukowych, pracy uczelni i instytut贸w naukowych.

Musz臋 powiedzie膰, 偶e te przypadki z Norwegii czy z Niemiec powinny nas czego艣 nauczy膰. Powinny przede wszystkim doprowadzi膰 do sytuacji, w kt贸rej okre艣lona jest gradacja dla okre艣lonych temat贸w, rodzaj贸w bada艅. Kt贸re powinny by膰 otwarte, a kt贸re, kr贸tko m贸wi膮c, powinny by膰 obj臋te okre艣lon膮 ochron膮?

Od razu dopowiem, 偶e wed艂ug mojej oceny, wczorajsza informacja o tym, 偶e mamy identyczn膮 liczb臋 patent贸w co Stany Zjednoczone, ale tylko 30% realizacji, te偶 z czego艣 wynika. Okazuje si臋, 偶e cz臋艣膰 patent贸w jest wykorzystywana poza granicami Europy. Cz臋艣膰 jest po prostu kradziona, a cz臋艣膰 jest wykorzystywana w spos贸b absolutnie nielegalny. Wa偶ne s膮, jeszcze raz podkre艣lam: klasyfikacja, strategia, budowanie hierarchii warto艣ci. Co powinno by膰 w og贸le otwarte, co nie powinno by膰 zamykane w jakich艣 szklanych skansenach, skansenach bezpiecze艅stwa, a co powinno by膰 zamkni臋te przed szpiegami, przed obcymi mocarstwami, kt贸re korzystaj膮 z naszych osi膮gni臋膰 i naszych pieni臋dzy?

听听Jos茅 Cepeda (S&D). 鈥� Se帽or presidente, se帽or铆as, a帽o 2019: ciberataque en la Universidad de Maastricht, con un听ransomware y posteriormente la exigencia de m谩s de 200听000 euros para liberar sus datos; a帽o 2021, Universidad de Oxford; a帽o 2022, Universidad de Cambridge: un ataque de phishing para extraer datos y credenciales de nuestros investigadores.

Sin lugar a dudas, el tema de la protecci贸n de nuestra ciencia, de nuestras universidades, de nuestro conocimiento es una cuesti贸n prioritaria que el 煤ltimo Informe Niinist枚 ha puesto encima de la mesa. Y esta es una cuesti贸n que, desde luego, la pr贸xima Comisi贸n 鈥攓ue est谩 trabajando ya en la protecci贸n de nuestros datos, de nuestro conocimiento, de nuestros investigadores, de nuestros centros de investigaci贸n鈥� tiene que colocar en el centro como una de las grandes prioridades.

Nuestro conocimiento, el de nuestras investigaciones, el de nuestros investigadores, est谩 en juego; nos jugamos mucho. Y, por eso, hablar de la ciberseguridad y la protecci贸n de nuestros centros de investigaci贸n es algo prioritario, tambi茅n, para la Comisi贸n que hoy se pone en marcha.

听听Piotr M眉ller (ECR). 鈥� Panie Przewodnicz膮cy, Szanowni Pa艅stwo! W debacie o kwestii wolno艣ci akademickich warto przypomnie膰 sobie, jak wygl膮daj膮 wp艂ywy w r贸偶nych obszarach, w艂a艣nie te zewn臋trzne, kt贸re pojawiaj膮 si臋 w Europie. I te trzy chcia艂bym wskaza膰 przede wszystkim i pewn膮 naiwno艣膰, kt贸r膮 te偶, niestety, wykazuje cz臋艣膰 os贸b na tej sali.

Pierwszy obszar to energetyka. Przypomnijmy sobie doskonale, jak Rosja wp艂ywa艂a na wiele uczelni na terenie Europy i przekonywa艂a, 偶e to gaz jest lepszy jako spos贸b zasilania Europy ni偶 na przyk艂ad energia elektryczna pochodz膮ca z elektrowni j膮drowych. Wiele os贸b na tej sali nabra艂o si臋 na t臋 retoryk臋.

Druga kwestia: ograniczanie pod pretekstem nauki, pod pretekstem ochrony 艣rodowiska rozwoju infrastruktury, na przyk艂ad w przypadku Polski na Odrze. Te偶 tutaj cz臋sto s膮 argumenty naukowe, ale tak naprawd臋 za plecami lobby innych kraj贸w.

I trzecia rzecz: to偶samo艣膰. Bo cz臋sto te偶 w艂a艣nie w ramach r贸偶nych dzia艂a艅 na uniwersytetach pr贸buje si臋 zbudowa膰 kosmopolityczn膮 to偶samo艣膰 po to, aby艣my nie mieli silnych narod贸w w Europie. A tak naprawd臋 to spowoduje w przysz艂o艣ci, 偶e Europa w艂a艣nie b臋dzie s艂aba.

听听Lukas Mandl (PPE). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Ein russischer Agent wird in der Regel nicht sagen: Ich bin ein russischer Agent. Er wird sich verstecken hinter zivilgesellschaftlichen Akteuren, hinter pseudomedialen Akteuren, hinter pseudowissenschaftlichen Akteuren, wird in der 脰ffentlichkeit auftreten 鈥� und wovon sprechen? Nicht vom Krieg, wie Putin-Russland Krieg betreibt, sondern vom Frieden wird der russische Agent sprechen.

Und das ist es, was wir erleben in unseren Gesellschaften als Teil von Putin-Russlands Angriffskrieg und von den hybriden Mitteln, die gegen uns eingesetzt werden, um uns zu schw盲chen, um uns zu spalten, um uns m眉de zu machen und die Ukraine selbst daf眉r verantwortlich zu machen, dass sie Opfer dieses Angriffskriegs Putin-Russlands ist.

Und deshalb ist es so wichtig klarzumachen, dass Fakten, dass V枚lkerrecht, dass Freiheit und auf diesem Weg die Arbeit f眉r den Frieden im Vordergrund stehen m眉ssen und dass wir uns nicht irremachen lassen d眉rfen von denen, die uns ein X f眉r ein U vormachen wollen und die eben nicht direkt sagen, in wessen Auftrag sie aktiv sind, sondern die das Gegenteil behaupten, aber in Wahrheit ihr Skript von Putin geschrieben bekommen.

听听Marcos Ros Sempere (S&D). 鈥� Se帽or presidente, autonom铆a y libertad. Estos son los pilares de nuestras universidades y debemos preservarlos si queremos mantener la educaci贸n superior y la investigaci贸n, que suponen la punta de lanza del avance social.

Necesitamos fortalecer nuestra competitividad y autonom铆a estrat茅gica para ser capaces de hacer frente a las grandes potencias como China o los Estados Unidos. Y este camino pasa por universidades libres y aut贸nomas. Debemos defenderlas de injerencias externas por parte de potencias extranjeras que intentan debilitar nuestra democracia, socavar la integridad de nuestras instituciones acad茅micas y censurar nuestra diversidad intelectual.

Ha de haber cooperaci贸n acad茅mica en la Uni贸n Europea y m谩s transparencia en la financiaci贸n de las investigaciones. La Uni贸n Europea debe explorar 鈥攋unto a los Estados miembros鈥� medidas para proteger la investigaci贸n acad茅mica y garantizar nuestra democracia y nuestra libertad acad茅mica; medidas que, adem谩s, cuenten con la dotaci贸n presupuestaria adecuada.

听听Marco Squarta (ECR). 鈥� Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, siamo a un bivio cruciale: l'Occidente finalmente riconosce la minaccia che deriva dagli Stati ostili. E non parlo solo di politica ma di un aspetto fondamentale della nostra sicurezza nazionale: la protezione della nostra ricerca e innovazione.

Le universit脿 europee sono un baluardo per l'innovazione globale ma la diplomazia culturale pu貌 mascherare intenti ben pi霉 oscuri. Un Paese come la Cina, infatti, 猫 riuscito a drenare in modo occulto conoscenze scientifiche e tecnologiche pregiate (alcune parole inudibili) la geopolitica. Non 猫 pi霉 una questione di ideologia, ma di sicurezza.

Per questo l'Europa deve agire con fermezza. Dobbiamo adottare linee guida rigorose per monitorare e gestire gli scambi internazionali, proteggere le nostre tecnologie sensibili e incentivare la condivisione di buone pratiche di sicurezza tra gli atenei.

Proteggere il nostro know how 猫 un imperativo, una battaglia che trascende il colore politico perch茅 猫 una battaglia per la nostra sovranit脿 scientifica e tecnologico. 脠 ora di difendere ci貌 che 猫 nostro.

听听Stine Bosse (Renew). 鈥� Hr. Formand! I sommeren 2020 blev en russisk statsborger, der havde boet i Danmark i tolv 氓r, anholdt. 脜ret efter blev han id酶mt tre 氓rs f忙ngsel for spionage samt udvisning af Danmark. Den d酶mte havde i en 氓rr忙kke udleveret oplysninger mod betaling til en russisk efterretningstjeneste. "S氓 氓bent som muligt, s氓 lukket som n酶dvendigt" 鈥� Det er og skal v忙re vores motto, n氓r vi taler om et konkurrencedygtigt og sikkert Europa. Det g忙lder selvf酶lgelig ogs氓 vores universiteter. Europas fremtid skabes i vores forskningslaboratorier og p氓 vores universiteter. Men fremtiden er ogs氓 under angreb. Der er andre, der gerne vil stj忙le den. Det viser sagen, som jeg n忙vnte. Det, vi har brug for nu for universiteter og lignende, er naturligvis en one-stop-shop og en v忙rkt酶jskasse til at l酶se problemet. I EU skal vi g酶re mere for at beskytte f酶lsom forskning. Det er vores fremtid, det handler om.

听听Salvatore De Meo (PPE). 鈥� Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, le universit脿 europee sono diventate sempre pi霉 soggette ad operazioni di spionaggio e di interferenze dirette o indirette da parte di Paesi non europei che, per motivi politici o economici cercano di sfruttare l'apertura e la ricerca scientifica dei nostri atenei per raccogliere informazioni sensibili sulla tecnologia, sulle innovazioni, sulla difesa, sulla politica internazionale, per poi tentare di influenzare i processi decisionali.

Ci sono infatti tanti casi documentati di trasferimento non autorizzato di dati sensibili da parte dei paesi ostili che lo fanno attraverso regolari collaborazioni accademiche o attivit脿 di spionaggio.

L'Italia 猫 stato uno dei paesi che ha promosso la decisione del Consiglio affinch茅 ci sia una migliore condivisione di informazione tra gli atenei e le agenzie di intelligence. Ed 猫 su questa direzione che dobbiamo insistere per garantire che la ricerca scientifica rimanga uno strumento di progresso e non di manipolazione esterna, nell'interesse delle sicurezze nazionali e dell'integrit脿 delle nostre istituzioni europee.

听听Tom谩拧 Zdechovsk媒 (PPE). 鈥� Pane p艡edsedaj铆c铆, v谩啪en谩 pan铆 komisa艡ko, d谩my a p谩nov茅, opravdu jsme tak naivn铆, 啪e nech谩me p暖sobit ciz铆 agenty na na拧ich univerzit谩ch? Opravdu jsme tak hloup铆, 啪e si nech谩v谩me ukr谩st to nejv臎t拧铆 bohatstv铆, kter茅 m谩me, skrze 拧pion谩啪n铆 softwary a skrze drz茅 chov谩n铆 t艡et铆ch mocnost铆? D谩my a p谩nov茅, nebu膹me naivn铆. To nejd暖le啪it臎j拧铆 a to, co tady plat铆me, po 膷em vol谩me, jsou inovace, nov茅 technologie, je na拧e pozn谩n铆. Je pot艡eba bojovat proti t臎m, kte艡铆 je bezosty拧n臎 kradou. Je pot艡eba se zam臎艡it na ty, kte艡铆 zneu啪铆vaj铆 akademick茅 prost艡ed铆 pro to, aby proti n谩m 拧铆艡ili nen谩vist, aby podn臎covali k tomu, aby se manipulovalo s fakty. Je pot艡eba bojovat s t臎mi, kte艡铆 p艡ich谩zej铆 nikoliv s n谩mi sd铆let na拧e hodnoty, ale na拧e hodnoty ukr谩st, proti na拧im hodnot谩m bojovat. A tyto hodnoty, kter茅 my m谩me, tak skrze n臎 tady cht臎j铆 拧铆艡it nen谩vist a propagandu t艡et铆ch zem铆.

Interven葲ii la cerere

听听Sebastian Tynkkynen (ECR). 鈥� Arvoisa puhemies, teollisuus-, teknologia- ja tutkimusvakoilu ovat Kiinan keinoja yritt盲盲 saavuttaa l盲nsimaiden osaamistasoa. T盲t盲 vakoilua tapahtuu my枚s nen盲mme alla meid盲n yliopistoissamme, koska olemme sinisilm盲isin盲 sen sallineet. Kiina puskee tutkijoitaan meid盲n yliopistoihimme ja velvoittaa lailla heid盲t tekem盲盲n yhteisty枚t盲 Kiinan viranomaisten kanssa.

Meid盲n pit盲盲 ottaa t盲h盲n nyt kokonaan uusi ote. Laki m盲盲r盲盲 Suomessa, ett盲 puolustusvoimien virkoihin nimitett盲v盲ll盲 ei saa olla valtion turvallisuutta vaarantavaa kaksoiskansalaisuutta tai ulkomaan sidonnaisuutta. Samalla tapaa t盲llaista mallia voisi alkaa hy枚dynt盲盲 esimerkiksi yliopistojen tutkijoihin. Tutkimus ja innovointi ovat yksi盲 niist盲 asioista, joilla voimme voittaa Kiinan kaltaisen valtion. Ei luovuteta sit盲kin valttikorttia heille.

听听Lukas Sieper (NI). 鈥� Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, ricordo ancora la prima volta che ho preso la parola in un'aula universitaria: la mia voce tremava ma era piena di passione. Quella libert脿 di esprimermi ha plasmato chi sono oggi. Ogni giovane merita le stesse opportunit脿 libere da qualsiasi interferenza straniera.

Oggi le nostre universit脿 si trovano ad affrontare una sfida sempre pi霉 grande: Paesi come la Cina e la Russia stanno tentando di infiltrarsi e influenzare le nostre istituzioni accademiche, mettendo a rischio l'indipendenza e la libert脿 che sono il cuore dell'istruzione europea.

Si tratta di un attacco diretto alla nostra sovranit脿 intellettuale e ai valori che consideriamo fondamentali. Le universit脿 devono rimanere luoghi di esplorazione libera non strumenti di giochi geopolitici.

(脦ncheierea interven葲iilor la cerere)

听听Helena Dalli, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Mr President, honourable Members, in a fragmented international environment, research and innovation are rapidly becoming a geopolitical asset.听Let me conclude by emphasising the 'de-risk, not decouple' principle enshrined in our economic security strategy, and this is what we are doing with our actions. We want to eliminate the risks, but our relationships with partner countries worldwide remain a key priority. We all work together to ensure that Europe remains a beacon of knowledge, innovation and collaboration in the global academic community.

Moreover, we all need to ensure that our fundamental values stay strong. Democracy, fundamental rights and the rule of law. With the upcoming democracy shield, as announced by President von der Leyen in her political priorities, we will work to further counter foreign information manipulation and interference and increase societal resilience to attacks on our democracy. You can count on the Commission to continue our active work, and I thank the European 合法博彩网站 for your constant advocacy and support on this matter.

听听笔谤别艧别诲颈苍迟别. 鈥� Colegi, vom trece la sesiunea de vot imediat, 卯n c芒teva minute. V膬 rog s膬 p膬stra葲i ordinea p芒n膬 ajungem acolo.

Dezbaterea a fost 卯nchis膬.

(葮edin葲a a fost suspendat膬 la ora 11:58)

IN THE CHAIR: CHRISTEL SCHALDEMOSE
Vice-President