合法博彩网站

IN THE CHAIR: ROBERTA METSOLA
President

(The sitting opened at 09:00)

听听President. 鈥� Good morning to you all. I have one announcement from my end: Milan Mazurek is a member of the ESN Group as of 22听January 2025.

听听President. 鈥� The next item is European Council and Commission statements on the conclusions of the European Council meeting of 19听December 2024 ().

By way of a reminder, after the first round of speakers on behalf of the groups, Members who have received speaking time from their political groups or the non鈥慳ttached Members' Secretariat will be called to speak and will be reminded of their allotted speaking time. This means that I ask you to keep an eye on the screens where the current speaker and the next two speakers will be displayed, and then you will be called to come up to the lectern.听The normal rules regarding blue cards and the catch鈥憈he鈥慹ye procedure will apply during the debate.

Now, I have the pleasure to invite the President of the European Council, for the first time in his office, to address us in this 合法博彩网站 on the conclusions of the last meeting of 19听December. Ant贸nio, the floor is yours.

听听Ant贸nio Costa, President of the European Council. 鈥� Madam President, Madam President of the European Commission, Minister Sz艂apka, Honourable Members. In my first speech in the European 合法博彩网站 as President of the European Council, I would like to address my greetings to all of you in this House, elected by the European citizens. I am looking forward to our close cooperation, to the debates and to the exchanges with you, to the debates after the European Councils, and to exchanges with President Metsola and the political group leaders in the Conference of Presidents, because only together can we address the biggest challenges that Europe is facing.

It was that sense of unity that presided over the first European Council I chaired in December. I took away three main message from that meeting. First, on Ukraine: the message was clear. The European Union reaffirmed its support to Ukraine for as long as necessary, and whatever it takes for a comprehensive, just and lasting peace. This is the message that we conveyed to President Zelenskyy, who joined us for an important exchange. We pledge to strengthen Ukraine's position for every scenario. Peace must be the peace chosen by Ukraine and by the Ukrainians for the sake of Ukrainian security, for the sake of Europe's security.

Second, on enlargement: we are fully committed to enlargement as the biggest geopolitical investment for peace and security for our people and our continent. This is also a central topic in the Western Balkans summit I chaired the day before the European Council. The six Western Balkan countries, as well as Ukraine and Moldova, are working hard to deliver on their commitments. There is no doubt that the future of these countries is in our Union. It is time for us to deliver on our promises as they deliver on theirs.

Thirdly, the European Council had a strategic discussion on Europe's role in the world. We need to renew our relations with the United Kingdom and work for a stronger transatlantic relationship, rooted in our common history and deep bonds with the United States and Canada, a partnership that has underpinned peace and economic growth for decades, based on our shared values and common interests. The European Union and the United States are each other's largest trading and investment partners. It is in the interests of both to keep fostering a stable balance and predictable trade relationship. We are looking forward to working closely with the new US administration to advance positive and fair economic cooperation, and to work on our shared priorities for prosperity and security, while naturally protecting our own interests.

The world today is multipolar, and it opens new opportunities for Europe. The European Union needs to strengthen its bilateral and multilateral relationships with third countries, based on common interests, mutual prosperity and shared priorities like climate action, sustainable development, or poverty and disease reduction. Because the world is multipolar, expressions such as Global South and Global North make no sense. It is in fact a plural world which requires tailored approaches and even more energy in our engagement. Therefore, I look forward to upcoming summits during the current semester with South Africa, Central Asia, Brazil and Japan, and also to the visit from the European Council to India to advance on those challenges collectively and more effectively.

Honourable Members, the European Union is a pillar of the international rules鈥慴ased order, upholding the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity and inviolability of borders. Continuing to support an inclusive and multilateral system under the principles of the United Nations Charter and international law, we 鈥� the EU 鈥� remain committed to all our international engagements, to a comprehensive agenda to tackle climate change, inequality and the reform of global financial institutions. We remain committed to the Sustainable Development Goals, the Pact for the Future and the Paris Agreement. Our Union is a project for peace that has been stable for decades because we value our alliance, our economic interdependency, our integrated societies. But to preserve peace, we need to assume greater responsibility for our own defence, our strategic autonomy and our sovereignty. This is why, since 2014, and especially after 2022, the Member States have been increasing their budgets on defence. Today, the 23 Member States that are also NATO allies altogether are expected to be spending above 2% for defence investment.

We have also taken major efforts together during the last years. We are implementing, with determination, the Strategic Compass. We fully use the new tools we have to ramp up our ammunition production and to acquire the most urgent and critical defence products. The Commission has also already put forward a defence industrial programme, and the European Investment Bank has updated its policy on supporting dual鈥憉se technology. There is an overall sense of urgency and strategic purpose among us. We are on the right track to build the Europe of defence.

That sense of urgency and purpose has led me to invite European leaders for an informal meeting on defence on 3 February. This is the very first time the European leaders will get together in a meeting exclusively dedicated to defence to prepare the ground for the next decisions we will have to take, and to provide political guidance for the White Paper on Defence being prepared by the European Commission and the High Representative. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer will join us for parts of our discussions, because Russia's aggression in Ukraine and our resilience from hybrid attacks are shared priorities. It is in our interest to do more in the field of defence, to become more resilient, more efficient, more autonomous and a more reliable security and defence actor. This way, the European Union will also become a stronger transatlantic partner, including in the context of NATO.

Honourable members. The European Union is also an economic and trade power. Yes, there are important challenges to our competitiveness, but Europe is home to world鈥慶lass research and industry, and high鈥憇killed workers critical for our economic growth strength in the years ahead. We hope that future generations will have the ambition to build a strong and vibrant Europe that brings shared prosperity for all and ensures just and inclusive climate and digital transitions.

The European Council in March will turn to economy, energy and competitiveness. We made it clear in the Budapest Declaration that we all agree with the analysis of Enrico Letta and Mario Draghi, and we must now decide on the right policies and deliver. I'm looking forward to the Commission's proposals on the Competitiveness Compass, the Clean Industrial Deal and bureaucracy reduction. I will work closely with President von der Leyen to advance on these fronts.

Finally, defence and competitiveness go hand in hand. Investing in defence in an integrated way while building a safe European supply chain network, energy autonomy and a innovative industry can boost our economies and job creation, as well as adopting a modern and reinforced European Union budget that is up to the challenges Europe is facing. A budget that invests in our collective security, a budget that forces competitiveness and innovation, and promotes a twin transition that works for citizens and businesses, leaving no one behind, no region forgotten, no problem without solution. Unity is the core element of our Union. United we are stronger and stronger; we are greater. Thank you very much.

听听Ursula von der Leyen, President of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President,听dear Roberta, Mr President of the European Council, dear Antonio, honourable Members, it's a pleasure to join this plenary debate with President Costa for the first time. And I would like to start by thanking you, dear Antonio, for the excellent cooperation between us in the first weeks of our common mandate.

We are only three weeks into 2025, but a glimpse is already there into the change that is coming to global politics. We have entered a new era of harsh geostrategic competition. We're dealing with continent-sized powers and they engage with each other based mostly on interests. This new dynamic will dominate more and more the relations between global actors. The rules of engagement are changing. Some in Europe may not like this new reality, but we must deal with it. Our values do not change, but to defend them, some things must change.

First of all, we have work to do here at home. If we want to protect our interests and uphold our values. We must also be economically strong. And Europe has, as you said, Antonio, all the instruments for successfully playing its role in the concert of powers. We have a private sector with a long innovation tradition. We have a top class workforce, highly educated. We have a unique social infrastructure to protect people from the great risks of life. And we have a huge single market of 450 million people. And that is our safe harbour in rough waters and our strongest leverage in tough negotiations. But our Union and our single market do need attention and care.

For us Europeans, the global race begins at home. And this is exactly what we've been discussing in the European Council. And all Member States agree on that. It is the core of the Budapest Declaration on Competitiveness that we agreed during the Hungarian presidency, and now under the Polish presidency, this consensus must be implemented. And that is why next week we will present our new competitiveness compass, which turns the excellent Draghi Report into action. It will be the North star of this new Commission and drive our work for the next five years.

We are setting three goals.

First, closing the innovation gap with our competitors. Second, we need a joint roadmap for decarbonisation and competitiveness. And third, strengthening our economic resilience and security.

And let me give you a few insights on each.

On innovation. Draghi's analysis is very clear. There is a vicious cycle of low investment and low innovation. And this has led, for instance, to a slower uptake of digital technologies here in Europe. So how do we break this cycle? Public investment must definitely play a role. For this to be effective, the coordination between the European level and the Member States needs to improve, in particular, in a few strategic areas where we really have to focus on, for example, AI or quantum or biotechnologies, just to name a few. But we have to focus on that. We have to invest there. Member States have to chip in. But we all know that public funding can never be sufficient.

So to boost innovation at the right scale and speed, private capital has also to come in. The good news is that European companies are already ramping up their investments in innovation. Last year, Europe's industry increased its R&D investment by almost 10听% and for the first time now in ten years, that is more than both in the United States and China. But we have to catch up a lot.

So thanks to these efforts, we are now back in second position globally in terms of total private R&D investment. But again, we must coordinate, we must concentrate and we must focus on the crucial areas.

For that to happen and to be successful, we need a conducive capital market for our companies and specifically for our Start-Ups. And to support this, we will be launching a European Savings and Investment Union. We will create new European savings and investment products, new incentives for risk capital, and a new push to ensure the seamless flow of investment across our Union. We must mobilise more capital to let 'made in Europe' and risk-taking innovation thrive here.

My second point: I would like to focus on the issue of energy prices. Energy prices in Europe are still structurally higher than in the United States and in China, and they vary significantly within the European Union. So we must bring them down while we complete the phase out of Russian fossil fuels. So both objectives are important and they should go hand in hand.

How can we achieve this? Not only must we continue to diversify our energy supplies, which we've done over the last two years, we will also have to invest in next generation clean energy technologies, because this is energy made in Europe. So it gives us independence. Take the topics of fusion, for example, or enhanced geothermal or solid state batteries, just to name a few.

We must also mobilise here more private capital to modernise our grids and storage infrastructure. So again, the topic of a deep and liquid capital market. We must remove any remaining barriers to our energy Union and we must better connect our clean and low-carbon energy systems. All of this, and much more, of course, than I mentioned today, will be part of a new affordable energy plan that we will present in February.

My third and final point is how to bolster our economic resilience and security. Global powers are now vying for access to raw materials and vital supply chains. In the last years, we have concluded more than 35 new agreements with partners across the world, precisely to ensure our access to raw materials and hydrogen, for example, and to diversify some of our clean tech supply chains. This work will be even more crucial in the years ahead.

As you know, since the start of this mandate, in less than two months, we have already concluded three partnership agreements with Mercosur, Mexico and Switzerland. And last Monday, we relaunched our negotiations with Malaysia. These partnerships address some of our key economic interests. They open new and dynamic markets for us. They protect our distinctive products with geographical indications and key sectors like agriculture. And they guarantee our access to critical minerals and clean energy.

So widening our network of partnerships was a crucial recommendation of the Draghi report. And we work with 合法博彩网站 and the Council to move these deals forward. This new engagement with countries across the world is not only an economic necessity, but it has to be a message to the world. It is Europe's response to rising global competition. We want more cooperation with all who are open for it. And this, of course, includes our closest partners, I think, of course, of the United States of America. No other economies in the world are as integrated as Europe and the United States. Millions of jobs on both sides of the Atlantic depend on our trade and investment. The trade volume between us is EUR 1.5 trillion. But beyond these numbers is also so much more: friendship, family ties, common history, culture.

This is something we will always keep in mind as we engage with the new American administration. Our first priority will be engage early, discuss common interests, and be ready to negotiate. And when the time for negotiation comes, we will be pragmatic in seeking common ground. But I also want you to know that we will always stand by our European principles. Thank you, and long live Europe.

听听Jeroen Lenaers, on behalf of the PPE Group. 鈥� Madam President, President von der Leyen, President Costa 鈥� welcome, President Costa, for your first appearance here as President of the European Council and congratulations on your first EU summit and on the 50th anniversary of the first meeting of the European Council. There is an impressive history there, but now, more than ever, we need to focus on the future. Thank you for being with us today. It's unfortunately not what we were used to in the last months of your predecessor, and we count on you to continue coming here regularly for exchanges with the elected representatives of Europe as this is an important part of our democracy.

Looking back at the European Council summit in December, I must admit it already feels like a lifetime ago. The world looks different. The EPP welcomes the ceasefire in Gaza and the progress it represents for the release of the hostages, and for addressing the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. It is a significant step to end the immense suffering on both sides, and we call on all parties to fully commit to their obligations.

On Ukraine, there is less reason for optimism. President Trump, unfortunately, has not kept his campaign promise to end the war within 24 hours. The fighting, dying and destruction continues also today. The European Council confirmed its unwavering commitment to support Ukraine, and of course we welcome and support that. But I also listened very carefully to President Zelenskyy yesterday asking Europe to step up and learn how to take care of itself so the world cannot ignore it. He even posed the question openly as to whether Europe will even have a seat at the table when the war against Ukraine ends. Now, I don't have to explain here how crucial it is that Europe is sitting at that table when it's about the future of our own continent. We must be there. I'm looking to the European Council to indeed step up and provide an answer to these strategic questions with more ambition.

With the inauguration of President Trump, we have also entered a new phase of geopolitics. Yes, the US remains an important partner and an ally, but it is clear that under the new administration, Europe is also a target. Another wake鈥憉p call that now more than ever, we need to ensure our own strategic independence. We need to bring back competitiveness to Europe and reduce red tape and unnecessary regulatory burden, to make sure our SMEs and industries can flourish regardless of what happens at the world stage. We cannot simply continue business as usual. We need to step up our efforts in the fight against illegal migration, and protect ourselves against the weaponisation of migrants by dictators at our external borders.

And we need to make sure that Europe can defend itself. We need a proper and ambitious European security and defence policy that really prepares Europe for any future challenges. Those future challenges are manifold, and we count on the leaders of Europe to step up their ambition.

听听Iratxe Garc铆a P茅rez, en nombre del Grupo S&D. 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, se帽or Costa, bienvenido al Parlamento. Es un honor darle hoy la bienvenida en su primera comparecencia ante esta C谩mara como presidente del Consejo Europeo. Su presencia aqu铆 simboliza su compromiso con el proyecto de integraci贸n europeo, un proyecto que siempre ha defendido con pasi贸n, con convicci贸n y con resultados. Su liderazgo ser谩 crucial en un momento en el que necesitamos m谩s que nunca unidad, determinaci贸n y visi贸n.

Se帽or铆as, este Parlamento es el coraz贸n de la democracia europea. Y no podemos ignorar que nuestra democracia est谩 bajo amenaza. Frente a las fuerzas democr谩ticas, se alzan fuerzas que buscan dividirnos, debilitarnos y retroceder en los avances que con tanto esfuerzo hemos logrado. Estas fuerzas est谩n alimentadas por las agendas del odio, de las mentiras, de los recortes de libertades, como las que representa la internacional ultraderechista.

Queremos seguir profundizando la relaci贸n estrat茅gica con los Estados Unidos y un v铆nculo transatl谩ntico que nos une y en el que creemos. Los Estados Unidos son un aliado imprescindible para hacer frente a los retos del nuevo tiempo.听Pero el regreso de Trump nos plantea desaf铆os evidentes, y nuestra Uni贸n no puede 煤nicamente resignarse a reaccionar, sino que debe reafirmarse con m谩s fuerza en lo que somos y en lo que defendemos. Nuestra Uni贸n se basa en un conjunto de principios y valores que no est谩n sujetos a cambios pol铆ticos, como en otras partes del mundo.

Trump es el s铆ntoma del empobrecimiento de las clases medias, que han visto c贸mo su poder adquisitivo se deteriora y c贸mo se les cierra el derecho a cuestiones b谩sicas como la vivienda. No olvidemos esta realidad, porque tambi茅n en nuestro continente persiste. Por eso, debemos actuar con determinaci贸n para reforzar el pilar social con salarios dignos, con ingresos m铆nimos que protejan a los m谩s vulnerables y con una inversi贸n ambiciosa de al menos 50听000 millones de euros anuales en vivienda p煤blica.

Frente al negacionismo clim谩tico y la apuesta por los combustibles f贸siles, que son una amenaza directa al planeta y a la vida humana, avancemos en la implementaci贸n del Pacto Verde, no solo porque es la 煤nica soluci贸n para combatir la crisis clim谩tica, sino porque es clave para nuestra independencia energ茅tica, para nuestra seguridad y para nuestra competitividad global.

Frente a los ataques de los oligarcas digitales a las democracias, defendamos una transici贸n digital al servicio de la ciudadan铆a y del progreso humano. Apliquemos con firmeza el Reglamento de Servicios Digitales, multando y restringiendo la actividad de estos oligarcas que no cumplan con 茅l. La democracia no se negocia; la democracia se defiende.

Frente al trato inhumano y las deportaciones masivas de inmigrantes, demostremos que la solidaridad y la humanidad son compatibles con una regulaci贸n ordenada de los flujos migratorios. Una pol铆tica migratoria bien gestionada es la mejor garant铆a para mantener nuestro Estado del bienestar, 煤nico en el mundo, y para preservar nuestros valores fundamentales.

Frente a las ansias expansionistas de algunos y frente a los anuncios de represalias arancelarias y sus amenazas a nuestra seguridad, reforcemos nuestros v铆nculos comerciales con nuestros aliados e impulsemos una industria de defensa europea aut贸noma.

Frente a la situaci贸n en Ucrania y en Oriente Pr贸ximo, hablemos con una sola voz y sin dobles raseros. No hay mejor manera de defender una paz justa en Ucrania que autorizando el uso de armas de largo alcance contra objetivos militares en territorio ruso. No hay mejor manera de garantizar una paz justa que destinando los 200听000 millones de activos congelados rusos a la reconstrucci贸n y el armamento en Ucrania. Y no hay mejor manera de promover una paz justa y duradera en Oriente Pr贸ximo que defendiendo la soluci贸n de los dos Estados ante los Acuerdos de Abraham, que solo trajeron m谩s odio y destrucci贸n.

Se帽or铆as, estamos conmemorando el centenario del nacimiento de Mario Soares, un hombre que dedic贸 su vida al proyecto europeo. Las palabras que pronunci贸 en el Colegio de Europa en 1977 hoy deben de ser nuestra gu铆a: 芦Como portugu茅s y como europeo 鈥攄ec铆a鈥� conf铆o en que la Europa que todos deseamos no aceptar谩 ser un simple club de pa铆ses ricos, sino una verdadera comunidad, ampliamente abierta al exterior y fundamentalmente solidaria entre las partes que, por mandato de la geograf铆a o de la historia, necesariamente la componen禄. Recordemos esas palabras y hagamos nuestra gu铆a para el trabajo que, unidos, tenemos por delante.

听听Jordan Bardella, au nom du groupe PfE. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Madame la Pr茅sidente de la Commission europ茅enne, Monsieur le Pr茅sident du Conseil, de l鈥橴kraine au Moyen-Orient, de la Moldavie 脿 la G茅orgie en passant par le Venezuela, l鈥檕rdre du jour du dernier Conseil europ茅en a 茅t茅 fourni, et les sujets de pr茅occupation li茅s aux grands troubles de notre monde 茅taient nombreux. Il n鈥檃 pourtant pas 茅t茅 jug茅 bon d鈥櫭﹙oquer la question, br没lante, de l鈥橝lg茅rie, malgr茅 l鈥檃rrestation arbitraire et au motif politique de l鈥櫭ヽrivain franco-alg茅rien Boualem听Sansal. Son tort? Avoir critiqu茅 dans ses ouvrages et dans ses prises de position le r茅gime alg茅rien, sa d茅rive autocratique et sa complaisance 脿 l鈥櫭ゞard de l鈥檌d茅ologie islamiste.

Aux portes de l鈥橢urope, un r茅gime d茅fie d茅lib茅r茅ment la France, entretient son peuple dans la mis猫re et l鈥檕ppression, instrumentalise l鈥檋istoire pour faire oublier ses propres 茅checs depuis l鈥檌nd茅pendance. Il m猫ne une guerre commerciale contre les produits agricoles fran莽ais, au profit, notamment, du bl茅 russe. Il refuse de r茅cup茅rer ses ind茅sirables (d茅linquants, islamistes鈥�), que nous entendons et devons expulser afin de garantir la s茅curit茅 de nos peuples et de nos concitoyens.

Sur un plan strictement national, la France doit assumer un bras de fer diplomatique: interrompre l鈥檕ctroi de visas, remettre en cause le trait茅 franco-alg茅rien de听1968, mettre fin 脿 l鈥檃ide au d茅veloppement et geler les transferts de fonds priv茅s 脿 l鈥櫭ゞard de ce pays et de ce r茅gime tant que son attitude demeurera ouvertement hostile. L鈥橢urope, quant 脿 elle, ne peut rester les bras ballants face aux outrances d鈥檜n gouvernement alg茅rien contre un 脡tat membre.

L鈥檃ccord de 2005 entre l鈥橴nion europ茅enne et la R茅publique alg茅rienne 鈥撎齫ue seule l鈥橴nion europ茅enne respecte, par ailleurs听鈥� doit 锚tre suspendu, et sa ren茅gociation, pr茅vue en听2025, doit 锚tre abandonn茅e. L鈥橝lg茅rie a per莽u au bas mot 172听millions d鈥檈uros de la si g茅n茅reuse Europe ces derni猫res ann茅es.听Coupons ces versements, que plus rien ne justifie! Cessons d鈥櫭猼re les seuls 脿 entretenir la rente de ceux qui, en retour, nous ha茂ssent! Nous devons enfin nous faire respecter par un gouvernement qui, depuis longtemps, a d茅pass茅 les limites de l鈥檌nd茅cence.

Comment pourrions-nous, nous, l鈥橢urope, pr茅tendre rivaliser avec les grands de ce monde si nous faisons preuve de tant de faiblesse 脿 l鈥櫭ゞard de ceux qui rient de notre apathie?

听听Nicola Procaccini, a nome del gruppo ECR. 鈥� Signora Presidente, Presidente von der Leyen, Presidente Costa, onorevoli colleghi, il Consiglio europeo ha affrontato diverse questioni decisive.

Su una in particolare voglio concentrare il mio intervento: i governi europei stanno finalmente comprendendo l'urgenza di prendere misure concrete per combattere l'immigrazione illegale. La risposta pi霉 efficace 鈥� ormai 猫 chiaro a tutti, diciamo quasi tutti 鈥� consiste nel fronteggiare il fenomeno all'esterno dei confini europei.

Infatti servono accordi bilaterali con i paesi di provenienza dei migranti, che vanno aiutati nella lotta al traffico di esseri umani, senza atteggiamenti sterili o snob da parte delle istituzioni europee nei confronti di chi governa quegli Stati terzi.

Soltanto cos矛 猫 possibile offrire a una giusta e limitata quota di uomini e donne di poter contribuire allo sviluppo delle nostre nazioni, avendo loro un lavoro da svolgere, documenti in regola e un mezzo sicuro per venire in Europa. Quanto tempo abbiamo perso dietro la cosiddetta ideologia "no borders" che ha gravemente influenzato questo Parlamento? Quante vite sono andate perse a causa della dottrina immigrazionista? E quante citt脿 europee sono state sacrificate nel suo nome?

Finalmente l'Unione europea sta iniziando ad allinearsi sempre di pi霉 con l'idea di dover fermare le partenze, mentre, contemporaneamente, si lavora per creare opportunit脿 legali di immigrazione secondo le diverse esigenze dei paesi membri.

脠 l'approccio pragmatico e di buon senso del governo guidato da Giorgia Meloni, i cui numeri e il cui consenso sono sotto gli occhi di tutti, ma 猫 anche il destino geopolitico che l'Europa deve darsi, anzich茅 piagnucolare per la ritrovata capacit脿 degli Stati Uniti d'America di scuotersi dal torpore naif degli ultimi anni.

Essere presente in Africa e in Asia con la propria politica, con le sue imprese produttive e commerciali e con le sue innovazioni 猫 la missione che l'Unione europea deve darsi per dare un senso alla propria esistenza, piuttosto che consumarsi in chilometri di regolamenti di cui i cittadini europei, francamente, non sentono n茅 la necessit脿 n茅 l'urgenza.

听听Val茅rie Hayer, au nom du groupe Renew. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Madame la Pr茅sidente, Monsieur le Pr茅sident Costa 鈥撎齜ienvenue dans cet h茅micycle. Vous verrez qu鈥檕n y discute toujours en toute franchise. Vous verrez aussi que vous y trouverez de profonds alli茅s, parce qu鈥檕n sait que vous n鈥檃urez pas la t芒che facile, dans les prochains mois, pour mettre les 脡tats d鈥檃ccord. Mais souvent, tr猫s souvent, vous aurez le Parlement europ茅en 脿 vos c么t茅s pour pousser les 脡tats membres 脿 davantage d鈥檃mbition, notamment sur la question de la d茅fense.听Vous l鈥檃vez 茅voqu茅, vous rassemblerez tr猫s bient么t les dirigeants autour de cette question. C鈥檈st une initiative tr猫s importante, que je salue听鈥�, 脿 l鈥檋eure o霉 l鈥橢urope peine 脿 锚tre audible dans ce nouveau contexte g茅opolitique devenu, on le sait, impr茅visible, il est temps de s鈥檃ffirmer et de parler d鈥檜ne voix unie sur les affaires du monde.

Je voudrais d鈥檃bord vous parler d鈥橴kraine: Nord-Cor茅ens, Cubains, Ghan茅ens, Sri-Lankais, Indiens, Syriens, N茅palais, voil脿 quelques-unes des nationalit茅s parmi les troupes russes aujourd鈥檋ui en Ukraine. La Russie fait le choix d鈥檌nternationaliser son conflit barbare. Alors la priorit茅 de mon groupe, Renew, c鈥檈st la victoire du peuple ukrainien. La victoire comme cheminement vers une paix juste et durable. Une paix qui doit 锚tre obtenue pour les Ukrainiens, avec les Ukrainiens et aux conditions des Ukrainiens.

Monsieur le Pr茅sident, continuons de soutenir l鈥橴kraine et je vous le demande, travaillez sur les sanctions. On a un vrai probl猫me avec leur mise en 艙uvre. Elles sont encore contourn茅es. Il faut pourtant qu鈥檈lles s鈥檃ppliquent pleinement: contre les responsables de cette guerre, contre la flotte fant么me russe, contre les pays tiers complices de la Russie.

Puis il y a le Moyen-Orient. Notre appel 脿 la paix y a toujours 茅t茅 clair. Il est d鈥檃illeurs encore d鈥檃ctualit茅, parce que l鈥檃ccord sur le cessez-le-feu et la lib茅ration des otages est indispensable. Mais, et les derniers jours nous l鈥檕nt montr茅, cet accord est fragile. Le cessez-le-feu 脿 Gaza doit 锚tre appliqu茅 sans violation et il doit durer. Les otages, tous les otages, doivent 锚tre lib茅r茅s. L鈥檃ide humanitaire doit 锚tre achemin茅e sans aucune entrave. 脌 terme, nous savons que seule une solution 脿 deux 脡tats offrira une paix durable 脿 la r茅gion. Une paix que les habitants, partout, appellent 脿 cor et 脿 cri.

Je veux enfin avoir un mot pour le peuple g茅orgien. L脿-bas, la d茅mocratie est attaqu茅e au grand jour par les soutiens de Poutine. 脌 Tbilissi et ailleurs, les manifestants prennent les rues depuis des semaines, des mois, apr猫s qu鈥檕n leur a vol茅 leur 茅lection. Malgr茅 les r茅pressions, chaque semaine un peu plus violentes, ils chantent notre hymne europ茅en, ils brandissent notre cercle 茅toil茅. Parmi eux se trouve Salom茅听Zourabichvili, au courage extraordinaire, 脿 qui je veux rendre hommage ici. Nous n鈥檕ublions pas les G茅orgiens, nous les entendons et nous resterons 脿 leurs c么t茅s.

听听Bas Eickhout, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group. 鈥� Madam President, good morning also to the President of the Commission, but especially, of course, very much welcome to you, Mr Costa, as President of the Council. We're very happy you're here. Indeed, as my colleague already said, it didn't happen that often that the Council President was present in 合法博彩网站, and I do think it's good that you are showing that you are willing to open up this debate with the European 合法博彩网站, because there's a lot at stake, and the Council has a lot of challenges.

If we look at the situation of Europe, to our east we have a dictator that is willing to go to war in countries like Ukraine. To our west, in the United States, we have a capitalist autocrat. I can't mention it differently. You have to be more diplomatic, so I can say that. But also on our southern side, of course, in the Middle East, there's turmoil continuously. So we need a Council that is stepping up, that is fighting for a strong Europe and replying to that.

But let's be honest, the councils have become a bit obligatory. If you read the Council conclusions 鈥� and I think less and less people read those Council conclusions 鈥� I just want to mention one example. With all these challenges, EU and the world, and what do the Council conclusions say? 'The European Council held a strategic discussion on the EU's global engagement and priorities in the current geopolitical context.' That's it. That was it! It's great you had that discussion, but what does it mean? What does it mean?

And also, here, when the President is saying 'our values will not change', then I hope that you will also challenge the leaders of Europe more in these discussions, because our international credibility is at stake. If we are saying the rule of law is important, international law is important, but when there is a ruling from the International Criminal Court and there is an arrest warrant for Netanyahu, and some of our leaders are saying 'we're not going to follow that through', then we have a credibility problem. That should be discussed and not only these lovely broad sentences.

We also need more targeted councils, I think, and therefore I very much welcome your specific council on 3听February on defence, because I do think these general councils discussing everything are not solving a lot. We need to have more focus and be challenging enough to each other and therefore I'm happy also that the Commission will come forward with its Competitiveness Compass and that also you already said in March you want to discuss that, because Draghi said this is an urgent matter and it needs to be addressed now. But he said that in September last year. So the urgency is maybe a bit relative here.

And I know here Trump is of course changing the world but I think we need to be more proactive and more trusting in each other, because Trump is shooting himself in the foot as well. In his energy definitions, now even renewables are not defined as an energy source any more. What will that do, with all the investors that want to invest in renewables? It is a chance for Europe. And it's the same that he's pausing the Inflation Reduction Act.

So he is creating uncertainty in the United States. That is a chance for Europe, but then we need to step up. Then we need to talk about the investment gap. Then we need to talk about maybe not always the bureaucracy on reporting, but the bureaucracy in our State aid rules, access to finance. That's what we should be discussing and not always get distracted by only the blah-blah on red tape but really look at what is hampering our industry.

And, therefore, we also need more rules on lead markets, we need more energy cooperation, cross-border infrastructure: that's what we need. And that's also where we hopefully can be more concrete when we are expecting a clean industrial deal from the Commission and the Council to discuss that. We are ready. I hope the Council is as well.

听听Manon Aubry, au nom du groupe The Left. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Madame la Pr茅sidente, Monsieur le Pr茅sident, les armes se sont enfin tues 脿 Gaza. L鈥檈ntr茅e en vigueur du cessez-le-feu est un immense soulagement, et sa pr茅servation doit 锚tre au c艙ur des 茅changes du Conseil, plut么t que la signature 脿 tour de bras de nouveaux accords de libre-茅change, Madame听von听der听Leyen.

Je pense aujourd鈥檋ui aux 2听millions de Gazaouis qui ont v茅cu depuis dix-huit mois dans la peur et la faim et qui voient enfin une lueur au bout du tunnel. Je pense aux centaines de milliers d鈥檈nfants dont le seul terrain de jeu 茅tait un champ de ruines, et qui vont pouvoir retrouver quelques instants de r茅pit et d鈥檌nsouciance. Je pense aux otages isra茅liens et aux prisonniers palestiniens qui vont enfin retrouver leurs proches, et la libert茅.

Mais l鈥檈spoir pr茅caire qui se l猫ve garde un go没t amer, car trop de temps a 茅t茅 perdu. Au moins 46听000听civils ont d茅j脿 茅t茅 massacr茅s sous les bombes isra茅liennes. Ces femmes, ces hommes, ces enfants ont 茅t茅 abandonn茅s par l鈥橴nion europ茅enne, qui n鈥檃 pas seulement 茅t茅 impuissante, mais complice du martyre des Palestiniens. Madame听von听der听Leyen, Monsieur听Costa, combien de vies auraient pu 锚tre sauv茅es si les 脡tats europ茅ens n鈥檃vaient pas 茅t茅 si l芒ches, s鈥檌ls avaient cess茅 d鈥檈nvoyer des armes 脿 Benyamin听Netanyahou, si l鈥橴nion europ茅enne avait suspendu son accord d鈥檃ssociation avec Isra毛l? Madame听von听der听Leyen, vous n鈥檃vez rien fait pour arr锚ter la guerre, mais vous pouvez encore agir pour r茅tablir la paix. Car, si le massacre s鈥檈st provisoirement arr锚t茅, le supplice des Palestiniens, lui, est loin d鈥櫭猼re termin茅. Ceux qui ont surv茅cu se retrouvent sur un champ de ruines, quand ils ne continuent pas d鈥櫭猼re pris pour cible, comme cet enfant abattu par un missile isra茅lien ou encore le camp de J茅nine, en Cisjordanie, sujet 脿 de nombreuses attaques.

En un an et demi, tout un territoire a 茅t茅 ras茅, sa population affam茅e et massacr茅e, l鈥檃ide humanitaire bloqu茅e, les h么pitaux d茅lib茅r茅ment d茅truits par un gouvernement g茅nocidaire d鈥檈xtr锚me droite dont le chef est sous mandat d鈥檃rr锚t de la Cour p茅nale internationale.听Alors oui, l鈥橴nion europ茅enne doit le dire clairement: les criminels de guerre doivent 锚tre jug茅s, la colonisation ill茅gale des territoires palestiniens doit cesser, et enfin un 脡tat palestinien souverain doit 锚tre cr茅茅.

Madame von der Leyen, vous ne pouvez racheter votre inaction coupable pendant le g茅nocide, mais vous avez le devoir, 脿 tout le moins, de tout faire pour prot茅ger les survivants et offrir une promesse d鈥檃venir aux enfants de Gaza.

Alors aujourd鈥檋ui, pour conclure, je pense 脿 ces mots du po猫te palestinien Marwan听Makhoul: 芦Je dois 茅couter les oiseaux, et pour 茅couter les oiseaux, il faut que cesse le bruit des bombardiers, qu鈥檌l cesse 脿 tout jamais pour qu鈥檈nfin la Palestine retrouve sa libert茅.禄

听听Alexander Jungbluth, im Namen der ESN-Fraktion. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin! Remigration 鈥� das brauchen Deutschland und Europa! Jetzt hat sogar der Europ盲ische Rat alle Parteien in Syrien dazu aufgefordert, die 鈥� ich zitiere 鈥� freiwillige R眉ckkehr syrischer Fl眉chtlinge in Sicherheit und W眉rde zu gew盲hrleisten. Endlich vernehmen wir vom Rat also eine sinnvolle Forderung. Die Machthaber in Syrien sollen die Heimkehr ihrer Landsleute anstreben, und wir als EU sollten sie dabei tatkr盲ftig unterst眉tzen.

Statt aber endlich Ma脽nahmen zu starten, zeigen die Asylzahlen der vergangenen Jahre genau das Gegenteil. 脺ber eine Million Migranten sind im vergangenen Jahr unter dem Deckmantel 鈥濧syl鈥� in die EU eingewandert, 240听000 davon nach Deutschland. Die deutschen Medien feiern das, weil es einen angeblichen R眉ckgang um 30听Prozent bedeutet. Wir als AfD sehen keinen Grund zu feiern, wenn j盲hrlich eine Gro脽stadt nach Deutschland einwandert mit Personen, die zum Gro脽teil f眉r unseren Arbeitsmarkt ungeeignet sind und lebenslang auf Transferleistungen angewiesen sein werden.

Die B眉rger in Europa und auch in Deutschland wollen keine Anschl盲ge mehr von ausl盲ndischen Terroristen auf Weihnachtsm盲rkte, wie es in Magdeburg geschehen ist. Sie wollen keine Silvester mehr haben, an denen Migranten St盲dte auseinandernehmen. Sie wollen keine Gruppenvergewaltigungen mehr, und sie wollen auch keine t盲glichen Messerangriffe mehr. Sie wollen nur noch eins: Remigration.

听听Paulo Cunha (PPE). 鈥� Senhora Presidente, o acordo pol铆tico fundador da estabilidade na lideran莽a das institui莽玫es europeias tem por base tr锚s pilares inegoci谩veis: a consolida莽茫o do projeto europeu, o apoio inequ铆voco 脿 Ucr芒nia e a defesa intransigente do Estado de direito.

A nova administra莽茫o americana evidencia o quanto necessitamos de fortes la莽os transatl芒nticos com os Estados Unidos. Mais do que nunca, as dimens玫es da soberania e da autonomia estrat茅gica da Europa s茫o cruciais para garantir a sua independ锚ncia e resili锚ncia frente aos desafios globais.

Queremos construir uma Europa que seja parceira e n茫o esteja dependente de parceiros, capaz de construir entendimentos internos acerca da essencialidade de pol铆ticas como a redu莽茫o dos pre莽os da energia e o desbloquear do investimento em todo o mercado 煤nico, enquanto alicerces do nosso crescimento econ贸mico.

A habita莽茫o precisa de uma resposta digna ao fen贸meno complexo em que se tornou, enquanto a crise demogr谩fica amea莽a o nosso crescimento como pot锚ncia mundial.

Esperamos que a nova lideran莽a do Conselho Europeu seja um marco da constru莽茫o da Uni茫o Europeia, coesa e forte, unida em torno dos seus prop贸sitos e valores, e que o seu presidente seja mobilizador das vontades e construtor de compromissos entre todos os governos da Uni茫o Europeia.

听听Harald Vilimsky (PfE). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, meine sehr geehrten Damen und Herren! Man kann auf der Autobahn der geopolitischen Entwicklungen unterschiedlich unterwegs sein. Man kann zu schnell unterwegs sein, man kann zu langsam unterwegs sein, man kann auf der falschen Spur unterwegs sein. Aber das, was diese Europ盲ische Union mit dieser Kommission macht, ist, sich mit Hochgeschwindigkeit als Geisterfahrer der internationalen Entwicklungen zu bet盲tigen. Und man braucht nur den Blick in Richtung USA zu lenken, wo sich zurzeit mit Donald Trump als neuem Pr盲sidenten sehr viel Gutes ereignet und Dinge, die mehrheitsf盲hig sind, z.听B., dass all die Illegalen, die in den USA aufh盲ltig sind, nun abgeschoben werden in ihre Heimat, w盲hrend die Europ盲ische Union zur selben Zeit T眉r und Tor offenh盲lt, um weitere hunderttausende Illegale auf den Kontinent zu lassen.

Weiteres Beispiel WHO: Die USA steigt aus aus der WHO. Gut so, aus diesem Bill-Gates-Verein auszuscheiden, der nur unr眉hmliche Rollen eingenommen hat in der ganzen Pandemie-Phase. Pariser Abkommen: Die USA steigen aus; das Pariser Abkommen, das zu einer Deindustrialisierungswelle gef眉hrt hat in ganz Europa听鈥� gut so.

Und daher meine ich: Wenn die Europ盲ische Union mehr vom Spirit eines Donald Trump oder vom Geist eines Viktor Orb谩n h盲tte oder dem, was sich gerade in 脰sterreich mit der FP脰 und Herbert Kickl manifestiert, dann w盲re diese Europ盲ische Union gut und richtig unterwegs.

听听Beata Szyd艂o (ECR). 鈥� Pani Przewodnicz膮ca! Panie przewodnicz膮cy! Szanowni Pa艅stwo Komisarze! Rzeczywi艣cie, od ostatniej Rady min膮艂 zaledwie miesi膮c, a jeste艣my ju偶 w zupe艂nie innej rzeczywisto艣ci geopolitycznej. I czas te偶 wyci膮gn膮膰 wnioski z b艂臋d贸w, kt贸re zosta艂y pope艂nione w poprzednich latach. S艂uchaj膮c pani przewodnicz膮cej von der Leyen, mam jednak wra偶enie, 偶e mimo i偶 m贸wi o tym, i偶 trzeba wzi膮膰 pod uwag臋 chocia偶by uwagi pana Draghiego, trzeba wzmocni膰 konkurencyjno艣膰 gospodarki europejskiej, to nadal pokazuje ten sam kierunek, kt贸ry niestety doprowadzi艂 do tego, 偶e gospodarka jest mniej konkurencyjna i 偶e Europa ma ogromne problemy i kryzysy. I to wszystko rozpocz臋艂o si臋 od momentu, kiedy zosta艂 na si艂臋 przeforsowany, i ca艂y czas w t臋 stron臋 idziemy, Zielony 艁ad.

Pani Przewodnicz膮ca m贸wi o tym, 偶e trzeba odchodzi膰 od paliw kopalnych, trzeba wzmacnia膰 energetyk臋. Pe艂na zgoda. Tylko pytanie jest takie: dlaczego Niemcy uruchomili wszystkie swoje elektrownie w臋glowe? Dlaczego chc膮 kupi膰 nowe z艂o偶a w臋gla na przyk艂ad w Polsce? Pani Przewodnicz膮ca m贸wi o umowie Marcosur. Dzisiaj przed Parlamentem Europejskim, tutaj, b臋d膮 strajkowa膰 europejscy rolnicy. Oni nie s膮 z tej umowy zadowoleni. Mam nadziej臋, jako by艂y polski premier, 偶e polska prezydencja, kt贸ra rozpocz臋艂a swoj膮 prac臋 w Unii Europejskiej, b臋dzie tym momentem i t膮 prezydencj膮, kt贸ra doprowadzi do tego, 偶e Europa rzeczywi艣cie i Unia Europejska zmieni ten z艂y kierunek i wreszcie si臋 przebudzi.

听听Karlo Ressler (PPE). 鈥� Po拧tovana predsjedavaju膰a, po拧tovani predsjedni膷e Vije膰a, predsjednice Parlamenta, povjerenice, o膷i svijeta ovog tjedna, razumljivo, usmjerene su na Washington i na inauguraciju novog starog predsjednika Trumpa. Politi膷ki trenutak, signali koje vidimo moraju nas u potpunosti osvijestiti. Ako se ne trgnemo, Europa 膰e nastaviti tonuti u labirintu vlastite rastu膰e birokracije.

Geopoliti膷ka utakmica postaje sve o拧trija. Europska sigurnosna, energetska, vanjska i migracijska politika zbog toga tra啪i dodatnu ozbiljnost i dodatnu odgovornost. Nova stvarnost tra啪i strate拧ki pristup, odlu膷nije djelovanje diljem svijeta, ali jo拧 vi拧e, od va啪nosti je ovdje, doma. To prije svega zna膷i smanjenje birokratskog tereta, pametnija i ve膰a ulaganja u obranu, ali tako膽er spremnost za hibridne ugroze.

Pred nama mora biti godina jasnog odmaka od 鈥�business as usual鈥� pristupa, jasna godina odmaka od prethodnih pogre拧aka, ali tako膽er jasna i sna啪na godina odva啪nih politika koje 膰e dovesti do konkurentnije, sigurnije i sna啪nije Europske unije.

听听Estrella Gal谩n (The Left). 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, se帽or Costa, 驴a qu茅 les suena si les digo que, durante el a帽o 2024, cerca de treinta听personas al d铆a han perdido la vida intentando llegar a las islas Canarias? M谩s de 10听000听personas han muerto intentando llegar a la frontera sur de Europa. Es una cifra inaceptable, 驴verdad? Y es tremendamente dolorosa, pero no se trata de un accidente, de una cat谩strofe natural ni de algo inevitable. Es consecuencia directa de las pol铆ticas crueles de control de fronteras que est谩n provocando que las rutas sean cada vez m谩s peligrosas. Unas pol铆ticas que, supuestamente, lo que persiguen es una migraci贸n ordenada y regular. Se trata de un eufemismo 鈥攜 ustedes lo saben de sobra鈥� porque sin v铆as legales y seguras no hay migraci贸n regular que valga. Lo sabemos. No enga帽emos a la poblaci贸n, a los votantes. No queremos v铆as legales y seguras. No las quieren y por eso tienen que jugarse la vida.

Entretanto, en diciembre, el Consejo, se帽or Costa, elimin贸 la cl谩usula humanitaria, lo que es muy preocupante, porque con esto estamos criminalizando a las ONG de rescate, que solo tratan de salvar vidas.

Y, en paralelo, la Comisi贸n ha empezado a desmantelar el derecho de asilo, entreg谩ndose a las pol铆ticas de la ultraderecha bajo la excusa de amenazas h铆bridas.

Este Parlamento no puede ser c贸mplice. Los derechos humanos se hunden como el Titanic y nos vamos a quedar como la orquesta, tocando bajo la m煤sica de la ultraderecha. Conmigo no cuenten.

听听Ioan-Rare艧 Bogdan (PPE). 鈥� Doamn膬 pre葯edint膬, concluzia fiec膬rui consiliu trebuie s膬 fie aceasta: s膬 nu o lu膬m razna. Altfel, ne vom 卯ntreba, cu duio葯ia Julietei din scena balconului din Verona, de ce blocheaz膬 fermierii capitala 鈥� de disperare; deschidem grani葲ele s膬 ne vin膬 lucr膬tori ieftini, import膬m obiceiuri aflate la 180 de grade de civiliza葲ie european膬, am umplut pia葲a de alimente non-UE proaste, dobor芒m recorduri de indecen葲膬 卯n numele corectitudinii politice, 卯i punem pe fermieri s膬 produc膬 numai mu葯e葲el 葯i industria auto doar triciclete.

Ne 卯ntreb膬m, de ce se radicalizeaz膬 cet膬葲enii care nu-葯i mai g膬sesc de lucru ca acum 20 de ani? Ne 卯ntreb膬m, de ce c芒葯tig膬 teren mi葯c膬ri politice care p芒n膬 mai ieri p膬reau o glum膬? Pentru c膬 pentru fiecare decizie care nu a 葲inut cont de bun膬starea europenilor 卯n primul r芒nd, dar i-a fericit pe al葲ii, europenii s-au sim葲it cu pieptul sf芒葯iat. Ne lu膬m de Trump c膬 vrea s膬 aduc膬 SUA str膬lucirea de alt膬dat膬. Ce ne 卯mpiedic膬 s膬 g芒ndim la fel? S膬 negociem 卯n numele r膬d膬cinilor noastre comune, s膬 ridic膬m din nou marea civiliza葲ie european膬 葯i b膬tr芒na Europ膬 acolo unde 卯i este locul: principalul factor civilizator 葯i de progres al lumii libere, cu o economie care s膬 func葲ioneze la capacitate maxim膬 pentru a produce bun膬stare, doar bun膬stare pentru cet膬葲enii europeni.

VORSITZ: KATARINA BARLEY
痴颈锄别辫谤盲蝉颈诲别苍迟颈苍

听听Enik艖 Gy艖ri (PfE). 鈥� Tisztelt Eln枚k Asszony! A decemberben v茅get茅rt magyar eln枚ks茅g es茅lyt adott arra, hogy az Uni贸 egy 煤j ir谩nyt vegyen. Arra 枚szt枚nz枚m 脰n枚ket, merjenek tov谩bbmenni ezen az 煤ton, hogy ism茅t naggy谩 tegy眉k Eur贸p谩t.

Vil谩gos c茅lok ment茅n politikai eln枚ks茅get vitt眉nk. Strat茅giai szempontb贸l gondolkodtunk egy er艖s Eur贸pa 茅rdek茅ben. Ez茅rt ment a minisztereln枚k b茅kemisszi贸ra. Am铆g nincs b茅ke Eur贸p谩ban, addig ugyanis nem lehet眉nk er艖sek.

P茅ld谩tlan ellensz茅lben dolgoztunk. A N茅pp谩rtt贸l a Baloldalig, 脰n枚k el艖re ki谩ll铆tott谩k a rossz bizony铆tv谩nyt. Tizennyolc dosszi茅 eset茅ben az EP blokkolt, ez 18 elvesztegetett lehet艖s茅g volt.

Ursula von der Leyen sutba v谩gta a loj谩lis egy眉ttm疟k枚d茅s elv茅t. Azt谩n decemberben politikai ellenfeleink megk枚sz枚nt茅k a munk谩t.

Ideje lenne lek眉zdeni az Orb谩n-f贸bi谩t, mert az eredm茅nyek tagadhatatlanok. Megsz眉letett a Budapesti Nyilatkozat az Uni贸 versenyk茅pess茅g茅茅rt. Rom谩nia 茅s Bulg谩ria a schengeni 枚vezet tagja lett. 脷jraind铆tottuk a befagyott nyugat-balk谩ni b艖v铆t茅si t谩rgyal谩sokat, nekikezdt眉nk a v茅delmi ipari egy眉ttm疟k枚d茅snek, letett眉k egy gazdabar谩t k枚z枚s agr谩rpolitika alapjait. Az illeg谩lis migr谩ci贸 elleni k眉zdelemben a hat谩rok megv茅d茅s茅re 茅s a kitoloncol谩sokra helyezt眉k a hangs煤lyt.

K茅rem a Bizotts谩got, hogy ezen vonalak ment茅n dolgozzon! A patri贸t谩k ezt sz谩mon fogj谩k k茅rni 脰n枚kt艖l!

听听Petar Volgin (ESN). 鈥� 袚-卸芯 袩褉械写褋械写邪褌械谢, 褍胁邪卸邪械屑懈 泻芯谢械谐懈, 锌褉械蟹 锌芯褋谢械写薪懈褌械 谐芯写懈薪懈 袝胁褉芯褋褗褞蟹褗褌 锌懈褕械 薪邪泄-褋褉邪屑薪懈褌械 褋褌褉邪薪懈褑懈 胁 褋胁芯褟褌邪 懈褋褌芯褉懈褟. 袨褌 芯斜械写懈薪械薪懈械 薪邪 褋懈谢薪懈 懈 薪械蟹邪胁懈褋懈屑懈 写褗褉卸邪胁懈, 褌芯泄 褋械 锌褉械胁褗褉薪邪 胁 屑邪谢泻芯 泻褍褔械薪褑械, 胁 锌褍写械谢 薪邪 谐谢芯斜邪谢懈褋褌泻懈褌械 褋懈谢懈. 袧械褋锌懈褉薪芯褌芯 薪邪谢邪谐邪薪械 薪邪 锌褉懈薪褑懈锌邪 薪邪 邪薪褌懈褋械谢械泻褑懈褟褌邪 胁 褉邪屑泻懈褌械 薪邪 褌芯蟹懈 小褗褞蟹 写芯胁械写械 写芯 褌邪屑, 褔械 芯谐褉芯屑薪芯褌芯 屑薪芯蟹懈薪褋褌胁芯 芯褌 褉褗泻芯胁芯写懈褌械谢懈褌械 薪邪 袝小 褋邪 褏芯褉邪 斜械蟹 泻邪褔械褋褌胁邪 懈 斜械蟹 薪懈泻邪泻胁邪 褋锌芯褋芯斜薪芯褋褌 写邪 胁蟹懈屑邪褌 褋邪屑芯褋褌芯褟褌械谢薪懈 褉械褕械薪懈褟.

小褉械写薪芯褋褌邪褌懈褋褌懈褔械褋泻懈褟褌 械胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻懈 薪邪褔邪谢薪懈泻 写芯褉懈 薪械 械 谢懈褔薪芯褋褌 胁 懈褋褌懈薪褋泻懈褟 褋屑懈褋褗谢 薪邪 写褍屑邪褌邪. 孝芯胁邪 械 褏芯屑校薪泻褍谢褍褋. 袨褌 谢邪褌懈薪褋泻懈 懈写胁邪 褌邪蟹懈 写褍屑邪 懈 芯蟹薪邪褔邪胁邪 屑邪谢泻芯 褔芯胁械褔械, 懈蟹泻褍褋褌胁械薪芯 褋褗蟹写邪写械薪芯, 邪谢褏懈屑懈褔械褋泻懈褌械 褌褉邪薪褋薪邪褑懈芯薪邪谢薪懈 谢邪斜芯褉邪褌芯褉懈懈. 孝械蟹懈 屑邪谢泻懈 褔芯胁械褔械褌邪 写芯褉懈 薪械 芯褋褗蟹薪邪胁邪褌 胁褉械写懈褌械, 泻芯懈褌芯 薪邪薪邪褋褟褌 褋 写械泄褋褌胁懈褟褌邪 褋懈 薪邪 械胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻懈褌械 写褗褉卸邪胁懈. 孝械 薪械 褋褏胁邪褖邪褌 写邪卸械 锌褉芯褋褌懈褔泻懈褟 褎邪泻褌, 褔械 胁芯泄薪邪褌邪 胁 校泻褉邪泄薪邪 懈蟹芯斜褖芯 薪械 械 蟹邪 褋胁芯斜芯写邪 懈 写械屑芯泻褉邪褑懈褟. 孝邪蟹懈 胁芯泄薪邪 褋械 胁芯写懈, 蟹邪 写邪 斜褗写械 谢懈褕械薪邪 袝胁褉芯锌邪 芯褌 械胁褌懈薪懈褌械 褉褍褋泻懈 械薪械褉谐懈泄薪懈 褉械褋褍褉褋懈 懈 写邪 斜褗写械 薪邪泻邪褉邪薪邪 写邪 锌谢邪褖邪 蟹邪 屑薪芯谐芯 锌芯-褋泻褗锌懈褌械 邪屑械褉懈泻邪薪褋泻懈.

袠屑械薪薪芯 蟹邪褖芯褌芯 薪械 屑懈褋谢褟褌, 褌械蟹懈 械胁褉芯褏芯屑褍薪泻褍谢褍褋懈 褖械 褋褗褋懈锌褟褌 薪邪褕懈褌械 写褗褉卸邪胁懈 懈 蟹邪褌芯胁邪 褌褉褟斜胁邪 写邪 芯褋胁芯斜芯写懈屑 褔邪褋 锌芯-褋泻芯褉芯 袝胁褉芯锌邪 芯褌 褋械谐邪褕薪懈褟 屑芯写械谢 薪邪 袝胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻懈褟 褋褗褞蟹.

Spontane Wortmeldungen

听听Maria Grapini (S&D). 鈥� Doamn膬 pre葯edint膬, domnule pre葯edinte, 卯n primul r芒nd, doresc s膬 v膬 spun succes 卯n noul mandat 葯i s膬 v膬 mul葲umesc c膬 sunte葲i prezent p芒n膬 la cap膬t, pentru c膬, iat膬, doamna pre葯edint膬, ca de fiecare dat膬, 卯葯i spune cuv芒ntul 葯i pleac膬. Asta nu este comunicare, asta nu este 卯n葲elegere. N-a reu葯it s膬 stea niciodat膬 pre葯edinta Comisiei p芒n膬 la cap膬t. V膬 mul葲umesc special c膬 r膬m芒ne葲i aici.

Domnule pre葯edinte, a葲i spus 卯ntre altele c膬 dori葲i o pace solid膬 pentru Ucraina 葯i o pace aleas膬 de Ucraina. Cum ve葲i face acest lucru? Pentru c膬 am aici un raport 葯i a葯 dori s膬-mi r膬spunde葲i; am un raport prin care se arat膬 c膬 3,5 miliarde impozit pe profit 卯n Rusia 卯n 2023 au fost pl膬tite de companii americane 葯i europene, 卯ntre care companii cu sediul 卯n G7 葯i 卯n UE 鈥� 17 dintre primele 20 de companii care au alimentat bugetul Rusiei. Dac膬 se va continua s膬 se alimenteze bugetul Rusiei, Rusia va fi puternic膬 葯i nu vom putea s膬 ob葲inem acea pace. Apoi, a葲i spus c膬 dori葲i o industrie competitiv膬 葯i suntem de acord, dar spune葲i-mi cum putem s膬 facem o industrie competitiv膬, c芒nd din mandatul trecut am avut un program pentru reindustrializare 葯i, din p膬cate, st膬 卯n raft. Nu s-a 卯nceput aceast膬 reindustrializare.

听听慕ubica Karva拧ov谩 (Renew). 鈥� Madam President, I think it's also a pity that the President of the European Commission has left the room, because the message I had was over to her and to the European Commission: I think it's very important that the new Competitiveness Compass which, as the President has said, will be released next week, reflects the current EU鈥慤S reality.

Donald Trump is not only a reality for our relationship, but it is also an opportunity for Europe 鈥� and I was missing that word 'opportunity' as it was not outlined by the President of the European Commission in her initial remarks: an opportunity to really make sure the European Union competes and offers companies and investors from across the Atlantic something that the US will no longer be able to offer.

I mean, red鈥憈ape and a savings and investment union is a bare minimum, but it is not something that makes Europe now more competitive and could make us more attractive for companies and investors from the US. So I count on the European Commission making bold steps, ambitious steps, to make sure we make this also an opportunity for Europe.

听听Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis (S&D). 鈥� Gerbiama pirmininke, gerbiamas Ant贸nio听Costa, gerbiami komisarai. Gaila, kad Ursulos von der Leyen n臈ra m奴s懦 tarpe. Bet a拧 nor臈膷iau i拧 karto atkreipti didel寞 d臈mes寞. Donaldo Trumpo sprendimas pasitraukti i拧 Pasaulio sveikatos organizacijos yra g臈dingas. Tai suduos did啪iul寞 sm奴g寞 daugeliui dalyk懦, pradedant nuo baisi懦 gr臈smi懦 pandemij懦 reguliavime, didelio mirtingumo skai膷iaus aplinkui, ir tai neabejotinai turi tapti Europos S膮jungos skubiu atsaku, k膮 turime daryti, kad b奴t懦 u啪tikrinta Pasaulio sveikatos organizacijos tvirta veikla. Donaldo Trumpo pasitraukimas i拧 klimato, i拧 Pary啪iaus klimato kaitos, irgi g臈dingas. Ir v臈l gi tar拧os problemos bus, bus did啪iul臈s katastrofos ir mes v臈l neteksime daug gyvybi懦. Lettos raportas, Draghi raportas atkreip臈 d臈mes寞 寞 investicijas ir inovacijas. Bet investicijos 寞 inovacijas, 寞 sveikatos sektori懦, 寞 sveikatos 啪moni懦 stiprinim膮 yra vienas i拧 svarbiausi懦 dabar u啪davini懦. Mes turime per didelius skai膷ius per ankstyv懦 mir膷i懦. Su tuo reikia b奴tinai 啪i奴r臈ti 鈥� sveikatos politika turi b奴ti taip pat ant Tarybos ir Komisijos darbo stal懦.

听听Ana Miranda Paz (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Senhora Presidente, Senhor Presidente do Conselho Ant贸nio Costa, bem-vindo! Falo na nossa l铆ngua comum, como falei consigo h谩 uns anos, quando fal谩mos, precisamente, dos inc锚ndios, um tema comum aos nossos pa铆ses. E falo nesta l铆ngua, porque 茅 uma l铆ngua europeia.

Gostava de lhe transmitir a import芒ncia de os territ贸rios perif茅ricos do nosso continente n茫o ficarem fora das redes de transporte 鈥� como a Galiza, o meu pa铆s, como Portugal 鈥�, de n茫o ficarem fora dessas redes priorit谩rias europeias. Tamb茅m, que projetos que pretendem instalar-se na Galiza, como o da macrocelulose Altri, n茫o venham destruir essa natureza t茫o importante.

E tamb茅m lhe quero falar de paz. O senhor 茅 um homem de paz, e queremos que, em Gaza, n茫o se repita mais a hist贸ria desse genoc铆dio. E o Conselho tem muito a dizer e tem muito a fazer.

Tamb茅m queremos que a dimens茫o social seja tida em conta, que os direitos sociais sejam uma prioridade para a Uni茫o Europeia, e que n茫o exista cacofonia como a que existiu, aqui, com Gaza, entre a Comiss茫o e o Conselho.

Muito boa trajet贸ria neste mandato, Senhor Costa.

听听Juan Fernando L贸pez Aguilar (S&D). 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, presidente Antonio Costa, la mejor respuesta ante el regreso de Trump a la Casa Blanca es establecer una...

(la presidenta interrumpe al orador)

听听President. 鈥� There is no interpretation, I'm being informed. I'm sorry. We have a technical problem here. You can speak, we can hear you, but there is no interpretation. We have to wait a bit, Juan Fernando, we need interpretation.

听听Juan Fernando L贸pez Aguilar (S&D). 鈥� Haben wir 脺bersetzung?

听听Die Pr盲sidentin. 鈥� Ich hoffe.

听听Juan Fernando L贸pez Aguilar (S&D). 鈥� Wow, was f眉r eine Situation. Und jetzt? N have to wait for the go. So. Okay. Okay. Juan Fernando Lopez Aguilar. Haben wir. 脺bersetzung. Frau Pr盲sidentin. Es ist m枚glich. Konnte ich wieder anfangen? Danke. Presidente Antonio Costa. Blanca. ESTA masada. Ninguna concession. Transition. Autonomie. State Innovation.

Se帽ora presidenta, se帽or presidente Antonio Costa, la mejor respuesta ante el regreso de Trump a la Casa Blanca es establecer una relaci贸n basada en el respeto mutuo, que exige que la Uni贸n Europea se respete a s铆 misma y respete su legislaci贸n: ninguna concesi贸n; ning煤n retroceso en el compromiso contra el calentamiento global y la transici贸n ecol贸gica justa; ning煤n retroceso en la autonom铆a estrat茅gica, que exige innovaci贸n, pero tambi茅n inversiones 鈥攊ncluido el cap铆tulo de la defensa鈥�; y, sobre todo, ninguna imitaci贸n a Trump en su agenda cruel contra los migrantes.

Esto exige que el Consejo y la Comisi贸n tengan competitividad absoluta y que los Estados miembros cumplan eficazmente sus obligaciones legales con respecto a cada uno de los reglamentos del Pacto sobre Migraci贸n y Asilo. Y, dado que est谩 el Consejo tan obsesionado con los retornos, solo cabe recordarles que hacerlos operativos exige negociar acuerdos mutuamente beneficiosos con los pa铆ses de origen y tr谩nsito, y eso solo puede hacerse con el incentivo de contrataciones en origen y v铆as legales y seguras que den una oportunidad a los trabajadores, que de otro modo arriesgar谩n la vida en manos de organizaciones criminales para llegar a la Uni贸n Europea, donde tienen garant铆as, seguridad y un perfecto respeto a su dignidad y a sus derechos fundamentales.

听听Jo茫o Oliveira (The Left). 鈥� Senhora Presidente, Senhor Ant贸nio Costa, as conclus玫es da sua primeira reuni茫o como presidente do Conselho s茫o motivo de preocupa莽茫o. Quem criou expectativas com a sua elei莽茫o estar谩 hoje certamente desiludido, verificando que, afinal de contas, nada mudou nas pol铆ticas da Uni茫o Europeia.

As preocupa莽玫es com as desigualdades sociais t锚m apenas lugar de nota de rodap茅. As conclus玫es do Conselho e a sua interven莽茫o, hoje, neste debate, insistem no militarismo, na guerra, na ind煤stria do armamento, no desvio de recursos or莽amentais para a produ莽茫o de armas e de muni莽玫es.

Nada disso serve aos povos. Nada disso corresponde 脿s necessidades e 脿s prioridades dos povos e nada disso contribui para construir um futuro melhor.

Por isso, o desafio que lhe deixamos 茅 claro: ponha nas prioridades da sua agenda o aumento de sal谩rios e de pens玫es, o direito a uma habita莽茫o digna e acess铆vel para todos, o investimento p煤blico nos servi莽os para garantir a sa煤de, a educa莽茫o, a cultura, a prote莽茫o social. Ponha na sua agenda a prioridade do trav茫o ao aumento do custo de vida e da constru莽茫o da paz, em vez da insist锚ncia na guerra.

Se fizer essas op莽玫es e colocar essas prioridades na sua agenda, certamente, poder谩 corresponder, efetivamente, 脿s necessidades e 脿s prioridades dos povos da Uni茫o Europeia.

听听Thijs Reuten (S&D). 鈥� Madam President, Council colleagues, I must say I was a bit disappointed with the Council conclusions in December, and it's nothing personal, dear Mr Costa 鈥� you are depending on 27 Member States.

The Council conclusions on Ukraine 1 to 9: good. But which countries that so far have given little to nothing of their military stockpiles to Ukraine did you convince since?

On enlargement, 'continued importance', 'their place is in the EU': great. But the question is, do we really want it? I don't see the commitment. Too much appeasement of destabilisers in south east Europe.

Then Georgia: for 55 days, they are on the streets for their European future. And we come up with some diplomatic passport sanctions next week. It's a reflection of the dangerous waiting mode the Member States are in. We wait for 5 November, we wait for 20 January, and we hope.

If you really want what you are saying, you need a more federal Europe with majority decision-making on foreign policy, on defence and much more. I wish you all the best.

听听Fabio De Masi (NI). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin! Der Stromausfall, den wir hier gerade erlebt haben, der ist ja ein Symbol f眉r die Situation, in der die Europ盲ische Union steckt. Wir hatten fr眉her die Kommission Juncker, jetzt haben wir die Kommission Bunker. Frau von der Leyen bunkert sich ein am Place Schuman, sie verweigert die Realit盲t, den Austausch mit der Bev枚lkerung und auch mit diesem Parlament. Was erleben wir denn in den USA? Eine wahre Zeitenwende. Eine Weltordnung geht zu Ende, und wir haben dort einen Pr盲sidenten, der jetzt aus der internationalen Mindestbesteuerung aussteigt, der uns Strafz枚lle androht, wenn wir nicht mehr von seinem schmutzigen Fracking鈥慓as kaufen. W盲hrenddessen haben wir uns v枚llig nackt gemacht in diesen Verhandlungen, weil wir uns abgeschnitten haben听鈥� zum Beispiel mit Energie鈥慡anktionen听鈥撎齰on billigerem Gas, ohne eine Alternative zu haben. Jetzt sind wir eben erpressbar, und wir beklagen uns 眉ber einige Oligarchen in den USA, die jetzt die Kommunikationsinfrastruktur beherrschen.

Aber was tun wir denn, um zum Beispiel das Kartellrecht einzusetzen oder Milliard盲re angemessen zu besteuern? Wir machen einen R眉stungswettlauf, obwohl wir sozusagen jetzt schon das Dreifache der R眉stungsausgaben Russlands haben. Wir haben 89 Gro脽waffensysteme, die USA nur 27. Frau von der Leyen ist nur Kommissionspr盲sidentin geworden wegen des R眉stungsfilzes in Deutschland. Wir m眉ssen raus aus dieser Logik und endlich wieder die eigenen Geschicke in die Hand nehmen.

(Ende der spontanen Wortmeldungen)

听听Dubravka 艩uica, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, honourable Members. many thanks for this lively debate and very constructive debate. As all of us know, the world is moving fast. So must we.听As has become evident recently, the geostrategic and security context is more challenging for the European Union than ever before.

However, we can build on some solid ground of unity and togetherness, and we should engage constructively with our partners internationally. That was a clear message from the leaders at the December European Council.

With regard to the new American administration, there are very relevant spheres of mutual interests across the Atlantic. Let us explore these spheres and look at mutual gains rather than differences in opinions.

Whatever we agree on with our partners internationally, the competitiveness of the European economy is key. We have a strategic agenda for the Commission, as you know, and it is very reassuring that this vision is shared by the European Council. We will need to timely implement our competitiveness compass.

Honourable Members, since the European Council meeting of 19 December, we have witnessed some positive developments in the Middle East. In Syria, the situation has been rather stable. Together with our partners, we should invest in humanitarian, economic and capacity-building support to help rebuild the country. This will also help create the appropriate environment for the safe, voluntary and dignified return of Syrian refugees.

Regarding Gaza, we are hoping that the ceasefire is going to be permanent. We are keen to rebuild Gaza as soon as possible. We will also take forward a multi-year support programme for the Palestinian Authority and coordinate reforms. This programme will be instrumental on the way to a two-state solution. This means that we will also continue our collaboration with Israel based on the Association Agreement.

The world is watching how we sustain our support to Ukraine. One of the most immediate challenges is the energy system. Just like the brave Ukrainian resistance, we will be steadfast.

Dear Chair, dear President of the European Council, honourable Members, to conclude, we are glad to see that there is a large degree of support in this House to bring our joint vision forward. Let us keep our sense of unity and our sense of action. The world is calling for a strong and united Europe. Let us rise to this occasion together.

听听Ant贸nio Costa, Presidente do Conselho Europeu. 鈥� Senhora Presidente, Caras e Caros Deputados, agrade莽o muito as quest玫es que foram colocadas. Infelizmente, como compreendem, em cinco minutos n茫o tenho a oportunidade de responder a todas, mas vou responder 脿quelas que creio que correspondem ao sentido geral das vossas preocupa莽玫es.

First of all, Mr Lenaers, we have been there to support Ukraine since the very first day of this terrible war. The European Union is overall the first Ukrainian supporter, and we will be there as long as necessary during the war, in peace negotiations and on reconstruction.听And we will be present to help guarantee a comprehensive, just and lasting peace.

Querida Iratxe, lo que est谩 alimentando a los populismos son las desigualdades. El acceso a la vivienda 鈥攅n especial por parte de la clase media鈥� y el efecto de la calidad de vida en el rendimiento de la gente son clave para afrontar las causas profundas del populismo.

Tenemos que estar juntos 鈥攖odos nosotros鈥� para defender lo m谩s precioso, que es la democracia. La democracia, hoy por hoy, est谩 sufriendo un ataque. Hay un ataque a la libertad de expresi贸n y a la libertad de informaci贸n.

Nosotros tenemos un marco legal muy potente, que tenemos que saber utilizar para proteger a nuestros ciudadanos, para proteger su libertad de expresi贸n y su libertad de informaci贸n contra los algoritmos controlados por los oligarcas tecnol贸gicos. Este es tambi茅n el combate por la libertad.

Monsieur Bardella, j鈥檃i pris note de votre souci 脿 propos des accords entre l鈥橴nion europ茅enne et l鈥橝lg茅rie et je vais me renseigner sur ces sujets. Oui, la migration est un ph茅nom猫ne qui nous concerne tous, nous avons d鈥檃illeurs approuv茅 le nouveau pacte sur la migration et l鈥檃sile en avril dernier. La Commission europ茅enne a pr茅sent茅 en juin ou en juillet le plan de mise en 艙uvre de ce pacte. Les 脡tats membres viennent de pr茅senter, en d茅cembre, leurs plans nationaux de mise en 艙uvre du nouveau pacte sur la migration et l鈥檃sile.

Il est maintenant temps d鈥檃gir, et nous devons aussi avoir conscience de ce qui a d茅j脿 茅t茅 obtenu. En comparant 2024 et听2023, il faut garder 脿 l鈥檈sprit la forte r茅duction des arriv茅es irr茅guli猫res dans l鈥橴nion europ茅enne (autour de 40听%). Nous attendons d茅sormais la pr茅sentation, par la Commission, d鈥檜ne nouvelle proposition de directive 芦retour禄. Toutefois, nous devons 锚tre conscients que la gestion de ces ph茅nom猫nes complexes doit s鈥檃ccompagner d鈥檜ne r茅flexion sur les voies l茅gales d鈥檌mmigration. Elles sont en effet l鈥檜nique fa莽on d鈥檃pporter une r茅ponse positive aux besoins de notre 茅conomie tout en luttant contre les passeurs et l鈥檌mmigration irr茅guli猫re.

Madame Hayer, l鈥橴nion europ茅enne est n茅e comme un projet de paix, une paix qui se trouve toujours au c艙ur de nos ambitions: la paix en Ukraine, la paix au Moyen-Orient, la paix 脿 Gaza. Nous saluons le cessez-le-feu 脿 Gaza, mais nous voulons qu鈥檌l constitue le premier pas vers une paix durable 脿 Gaza. Pour cela, nous devons soutenir d猫s maintenant, sans 茅conomiser nos efforts, l鈥檃ide humanitaire au peuple de Gaza, qui souffre.

En ce qui concerne la G茅orgie, je vous invite 脿 r茅fl茅chir: je crois n茅cessaire de faire 茅voluer la mani猫re dont nous effectuons traditionnellement les missions d鈥檕bservation 茅lectorale. En effet, la manipulation 茅lectorale ne se limite d茅sormais plus au jour des 茅lections, mais elle commence bien avant. Nous devons commencer plus t么t la surveillance des processus 茅lectoraux, pour nous int茅resser 脿 la v茅rit茅 et 脿 l鈥檃uthenticit茅 de ces processus.

We are a Union of diversities, with different histories, different cultures, and we also look at the world from different geographical point of views. We need to use the European Council meetings to build common positions. That's why I introduce certain points 鈥� to have a free discussion without the pressure of taking concrete conclusions and publishing the conclusions. In order to achieve a position of unity, we need to talk and we need to listen to and try to understand each other to build a common position. We take very seriously the Draghi Report. In October, we approved the Budapest Declaration and we tasked the Commission to present, in the coming months, new and concrete proposals. Today, Madam von der Leyen updated all of us about the incoming proposals that the Commission is preparing. On the Council, we will come back on economics, on energy security and competitiveness in our Council in March. Before leaving, I would like to express my best wishes to the Polish President under the leadership of my very good friend and predecessor, Prime Minister Donald Tusk. All the best for the Polish Presidency. Thank you very much.

听听Die Pr盲sidentin. 鈥� Die Aussprache ist geschlossen.

Schriftliche Erkl盲rungen (Artikel 178)

听听Sebastian Tynkkynen (ECR), kirjallinen. 鈥� Arvoisa puhemies,

Ukrainan sotaa on k盲yty jo noin kolme vuotta.

Vaikka sota on ovellamme, Euroopan toimissa Ven盲j盲盲 vastaan on ihmeellist盲 rimpuilua.

Saksan demariliittokansleri Scholzin h盲pe盲llinen toiminta Ukraina-aseavun torppaamisessa on viimeisin surullinen osoitus t盲st盲.

Ukraina tarvitsee juuri nyt mahdollisimman vahvan selk盲nojan

a) ensinn盲kin puolustaakseen Eurooppaa ja

b) mahdollisia tulevia rauhanneuvotteluja varten.

Emme voi ajaa itse盲mme tilanteeseen, jossa Putin n盲kee Ukrainan taustalla heikon Scholzin, heikon Macronin ja sit盲 kautta heikon Euroopan.

Kysyn, mik盲 on toinen vaihtoehto Ukrainan tukemiselle?

Naton p盲盲sihteeri Mark Ruttea mukaillakseni:

Jollette satsaa puolustukseen kunnolla, niin vaihtoehtoinanne on muuttaa Uuteen-Seelantiin tai ottaa ven盲j盲n oppikirjat esiin.

Siin盲 tilanteessa me Euroopassa olemme. Ja t盲h盲n olisi nyt syyt盲 viimeistenkin her盲t盲.

(Die Sitzung wird um 10:29 Uhr unterbrochen.)

IN THE CHAIR: ROBERTA METSOLA
President

(The sitting resumed at 10:37)

听听President. 鈥� The next item is the debate on the Council and Commission statements on the presentation of the programme of activities of the Polish Presidency ().

Dear colleagues, on 1听January, Poland took over the Presidency of the Council of the European Union, and today we are honoured to welcome the Prime Minister of Poland, Donald Tusk, to introduce his Presidency's priorities to this House.

Dear Prime Minister, dear Donald, witamy 鈥� welcome.

(Applause)

It is good to see you back in the European 合法博彩网站.

A strong Poland means a strong Europe, and Poland is ready for the challenge of this Presidency. Under your leadership, Poland entered 2025 as a European front runner in economic growth and a leading voice for collective European action on competitiveness and security.

Dear Prime Minister, you take the reins as the world around us has become more unpredictable. Increasingly, Europe's way and our unity will come under renewed pressure and I know that in those moments, as we collectively face down these global challenges, Europe will be able to rely on Polish courage and spirit to anchor our Union, and you will find this 合法博彩网站 as a solid partner in your journey.

When we see what Russia did in Ukraine, the dictatorship in Belarus, the instability in the Middle East, Europe will be called upon to do more, to stand up for our way, to lead. And Europe will be ready for this new reality. We must step up and act with determination to ensure that our Union continues to thrive, to ensure that we are able to generate the prosperity our European way relies on, to make people's lives easier, to ensure our people can live securely and in safety.

This also means taking steps to ensure Europe secures its own frontiers, protects its critical infrastructure and builds its defence readiness to counter very real external threats and defend our strategic autonomy. And we must go even further, working together to increase our collective security across our Union in all areas, from migration to energy and economy.

With Poland at the helm of this Presidency, guided by your leadership and your vision, dear Donald, I am confident our Union can tackle these critical issues and emerge even stronger, even more secure, even more prosperous. The steps we choose to take together in the next six months will be decisive for our Union, and there is no time to lose. The time to act is now.听In the words of that great Pole, Pope John Paul听II, the future starts today, not tomorrow.

So, dear Prime Minister, dear Donald, the floor is yours.

(Applause)

听听Donald Tusk, Urz臋duj膮cy Przewodnicz膮cy Rady. 鈥� Pani 笔谤锄别飞辞诲苍颈肠锄膮肠补. Dear Roberta. Dear Friends. Drodzy Przyjaciele. Jeszcze Europa nie zgin臋艂a, p贸ki my 偶yjemy. Ta parafraza s艂贸w polskiego hymnu chyba dobrze oddaje nastr贸j, nastr贸j odczuwalny w ka偶dym zak膮tku naszego globu. Nastr贸j niepewno艣ci, czasami dezorientacji. Mo偶emy dzisiaj m贸wi膰 o pewnym kryzysie ducha. Chcia艂bym dzisiaj, je艣li pozwolicie, podzieli膰 si臋 z wami refleksj膮 troch臋 g艂臋bsz膮 ni偶 tylko te konkretne zadania, jakie stoj膮 przed polsk膮 prezydencj膮.

Wszyscy tu, w Parlamencie Europejskim, a przynajmniej ci z Was, kt贸rzy s膮 zainteresowani szczeg贸艂ami programu polskiej prezydencji, na pewno zd膮偶yli si臋 ju偶 z tym zapozna膰. Wiecie, 偶e uznali艣my za najwa偶niejsze bezpiecze艅stwo i 偶e motto tej prezydencji to "Bezpiecze艅stwo, Europo". Bo jest to te偶 pr贸ba odpowiedzi na ten moment globalnego zawahania, jaka b臋dzie nasza przysz艂o艣膰 tu w Europie, przysz艂o艣膰 poszczeg贸lnych pa艅stw cz艂onkowskich, Unii Europejskiej, ca艂ej cywilizacji politycznej, cywilizacji Zachodu. 呕yjemy w warunkach konfliktu tu偶 przy naszych granicach. Gwa艂towny i czasami niekontrolowany, szczeg贸lnie przez zwyk艂ych ludzi, post臋p cywilizacyjny. Wszystko to powoduje, 偶e niekt贸rzy z obywateli Europy jakby czuli, 偶e stracili grunt pod nogami. A wi臋c m贸wimy o kryzysie pewnych emocji pozytywnych i kryzysie ducha. Ale przecie偶 obiektywnie rzecz bior膮c, Europa nie ma 偶adnych powod贸w do kompleks贸w.

Dzisiaj by膰 mo偶e najwa偶niejsze s艂owa, jakie powinny pa艣膰 tu w Parlamencie Europejskim, to s艂owa skierowane wprost do Europejek i Europejczyk贸w: Podnie艣cie wysoko swoje g艂owy. Europa by艂a, jest i b臋dzie wielka. Europe is, Europe was and Europe will always be great. I nie chodzi tu o polityczne slogany. Jak cz臋sto zapominamy o tym, 偶e Unia Europejska to 450 milion贸w ludzi, to 27 dumnych pa艅stw narodowych, kt贸re potrafi艂y przez lata, potrafi膮 dzi艣 i b臋d膮 potrafi艂y jutro uzgadnia膰, czasami w trudnych procesach, ale uzgadnia膰 wsp贸lne stanowisko. I to w tak krytycznych momentach jak kryzysy finansowe, energetyczne, migracyjne, terrorystyczne, pandemia, wojna za nasz膮 wschodni膮 granic膮. Zobaczcie, jak bardzo rzetelnie, z jak膮 determinacj膮 narody europejskie, pa艅stwa cz艂onkowskie, instytucje, Unia Europejska jako ca艂o艣膰 podchodzimy do tych wyzwa艅. I nie ma naprawd臋 偶adnego powodu, aby Europa dzisiaj, szczeg贸lnie dzisiaj, uzna艂a, 偶e znale藕li艣my si臋 w jakich艣 absolutnie egzystencjalnych k艂opotach i problemach.

Tak, nast膮pi艂y pewne masywne zmiany, kt贸re wzmacniaj膮 to poczucie niepewno艣ci, Ale pozw贸lcie, 偶e skorzystam z mojego wieloletniego do艣wiadczenia, przemawia艂em tutaj do tego parlamentu w czasie pierwszej polskiej prezydencji, wielokrotnie rozmawia艂em z Wami, kiedy by艂em przewodnicz膮cym Rady Europejskiej i mam bardzo dobrze w pami臋ci te, te chwile kryzysu, zw膮tpienia i mam bardzo dobrze w pami臋ci, jak dawali艣my rad臋. R贸偶nimy si臋 na tej sali pod wieloma wzgl臋dami. Mamy tu lewic臋, prawic臋, mniej i bardziej radykalne ruchy, ci膮gle du偶e centrum polityczne. K艂贸cimy si臋 w swoich narodowych parlamentach, prowadzimy ostre kampanie wyborcze, ale przecie偶 potrafimy jako Europejczycy odnajdywa膰 ka偶dego dnia, ka偶dego roku t臋 przestrze艅 wsp贸ln膮. Przecie偶 to ona powoduje to poczucie wsp贸lnoty. Niekt贸re elementy tej wsp贸lnoty s膮 kwestionowane, ale to poczucie, generalnie poczucie wsp贸lnoty politycznej powoduje, 偶e mi臋dzy innymi jeste艣cie tutaj, na tej sali wszyscy razem, niezale偶nie od tego, jakie partie reprezentujecie.

Nazwijmy rzecz po imieniu, ta, jak niekt贸rzy uwa偶aj膮, rewolucyjna zmiana polityczna w Stanach Zjednoczonych spowodowa艂a pewn膮 polityczn膮 dezorientacj臋 w wielu pa艅stwach europejskich. Pad艂y pewne s艂owa, deklaracje polityczne, kt贸re uzasadniaj膮 to poczucie dezorientacji czy niepewno艣ci u niekt贸rych polityk贸w. Ale w 偶aden spos贸b nie usprawiedliwiaj膮 czy nie uzasadniaj膮 tego upadku ducha europejskiego. Tak jest. To, co dzieje si臋 wok贸艂 nas, to, co dzieje si臋 w Europie, ale przede wszystkim wok贸艂 nas, to, co dzieje si臋 w wymiarze geopolitycznym, stawia przed Europ膮 zupe艂nie nowe wyzwania. Ale Europa jest po to, 偶eby takim wyzwaniom stawia膰 czo艂a. Kiedy s艂yszymy przyw贸dc贸w innych pa艅stw, s艂uchali艣my wszyscy uwa偶nie, cho膰by inauguracyjnego przem贸wienia prezydenta Donalda Trumpa, i przyw贸dcy innych pa艅stw, i innych pot臋g m贸wi膮 z dum膮 i satysfakcj膮 o dokonaniach swoich pa艅stw, o tradycji, o wielkiej przesz艂o艣ci i wielkiej przysz艂o艣ci. Europa ma prawo m贸wi膰 tak samo dosadnie, tak samo g艂o艣no, z takim samym przekonaniem o swojej wielko艣ci z przesz艂o艣ci, tera藕niejszo艣ci i o swojej wierze w wielk膮 przysz艂o艣膰 naszego kontynentu i naszej Unii. Musimy tylko szeroko otworzy膰 oczy i nie obra偶a膰 si臋 na zmian臋 okoliczno艣ci.

S艂uchajcie, no, we藕my t臋 kwesti臋 kluczow膮, jak膮 dzisiaj jest bezpiecze艅stwo. Bo przecie偶 to nie tylko polska prezydencja uznaje to za priorytet. Wszyscy wiemy, 偶e bezpiecze艅stwo w r贸偶nych wymiarach jest najwa偶niejsze z punktu widzenia codziennego 偶ycia ka偶dego Europejczyka, naszych pa艅stw narodowych i Unii jako ca艂o艣ci. Chc臋 Wam powiedzie膰, 偶e je艣li uwa偶amy, 偶e zmiana administracji ameryka艅skiej i inne okoliczno艣ci to jest w jakim艣 sensie skok w nieznane, to przypomnijmy sobie, 偶e Europa budowa艂a swoj膮 wielko艣膰, bo nigdy nie ba艂a si臋 i艣膰 w to nieznane z podniesion膮 g艂ow膮. Kiedy s艂ucham, kiedy inni przyw贸dcy innych pot臋g 艣wiatowych wspominaj膮 te wielkie chwile swojej historii, to chc臋 Wam powiedzie膰, 偶e my te偶 w naszej pami臋ci zbiorowej powinni艣my zawsze mie膰 te wielkie wydarzenia, kt贸re zdecydowa艂y o losach 艣wiata, a kt贸re rodzi艂y si臋 tu w Europie.

Europa to by艂 kontynent, z kt贸rego pochodzili najwi臋ksi odkrywcy, wynalazcy, stratedzy. I nigdy nie bali艣my si臋 tej niepewno艣ci. Nigdy nie bali艣my si臋 skoku w nieznane. To nie musi by膰 przekle艅stwo. Traktujmy to wyzwanie te偶 jako szans臋 dla Europy. Mo偶emy znowu by膰 najbardziej konkurencyjni na ca艂ym 艣wiecie, nie tylko w gospodarce, ale te偶 w polityce. Bo zawsze w przesz艂o艣ci byli艣my kreatywni, odwa偶ni, nie l臋kali艣my si臋 tego niepewnego. Czy to by艂 Aleksander Wielki, czy to by艂 Krzysztof Kolumb, czy to byli Wikingowie, czy odkrywcy Ameryki, nomen omen. Kochani, to jest nasza historia, to jest Europa.

Sko艅czy艂 si臋 czas komfortu, to wszyscy wiemy. Je艣li dzisiaj prezydent Stan贸w Zjednoczonych m贸wi o konieczno艣ci wzi臋cia wi臋kszej odpowiedzialno艣ci przez Europ臋, przez sojusznik贸w ameryka艅skich, wi臋kszej odpowiedzialno艣ci za w艂asne bezpiecze艅stwo, traktujmy to jako pozytywne wyzwanie. Chc臋 Wam powiedzie膰, 偶e tak naprawd臋 tylko sojusznik mo偶e 偶yczy膰 swojemu sojusznikowi, 偶eby by艂 silniejszy. Nie traktujcie tego jako wypowiedzi przeciwnika Europy w kwestii sojuszniczej wsp贸艂pracy na rzecz bezpiecze艅stwa 艣wiata Zachodu, Unii Europejskiej, Stan贸w Zjednoczonych, Kanady, ca艂ego NATO. Nadal musimy stara膰 si臋 nie tylko m贸wi膰 wsp贸lnym j臋zykiem, ale podejmowa膰 tak偶e dzia艂ania. I dzisiaj to Europa musi podj膮膰 takie dzia艂ania.

Kiedy s艂ucham wypowiedzi zza oceanu, to uwa偶am, 偶e nikt z Was, nikt tu w Europie nie powinien si臋 irytowa膰 niekt贸rymi sugestiami czy wskazaniami. A偶 si臋 narzuca parafraza s艂ynnych s艂贸w Kennedy'ego: Ask not what America can do for Europe and its security, ask what we ourselves can do for it? "Nie pytajcie ju偶 wi臋cej Ameryki, co mo偶e zrobi膰 dla naszego bezpiecze艅stwa. Pytajcie samych siebie co Wy, Co my mo偶emy zrobi膰 dla naszego bezpiecze艅stwa?" I jestem przekonany, 偶e Unia Europejska, pa艅stwa narodowe, cz艂onkowskie Unii Europejskiej b臋d膮 najcenniejszym sojusznikiem tak偶e z punktu widzenia Waszyngtonu, je艣li we藕miemy kwestie bezpiecze艅stwa we w艂asne r臋ce, je艣li staniemy na swoich nogach, je艣li otworzymy swoje g艂owy, otworzymy szeroko oczy i zobaczymy, gdzie jest zagro偶enie, gdzie jest wr贸g, czego nie zrobili艣my, gdzie by艂y zaniechania, gdzie s膮 藕r贸d艂a naszej, jak niekt贸rzy m贸wi膮, s艂abo艣ci? Ja bym nie m贸wi艂 o s艂abo艣ci, bo, tak jak powiedzia艂em, my potencjalnie mo偶emy by膰 pot臋g膮 r贸wn膮 tym najwi臋kszym. Mamy taki sam udzia艂 w 艣wiatowym GDP jak Stany Zjednoczone.

Kiedy dzisiaj m贸wimy o zagro偶eniu ze strony Rosji, to - jak s艂ysz臋 niekt贸re wypowiedzi - musz臋 Wam powiedzie膰, 偶e to jest a偶 偶a艂osne, 偶e niekt贸rzy w Europie maj膮 kompleksy wobec, nie wiem, gospodarki rosyjskiej, nauki rosyjskiej potencja艂u, jakiego, demograficznego, graficznego, etycznego. Trzeba na nowo uwierzy膰 w swoj膮 si艂臋. Ten potencja艂 jest faktem. Jeste艣my silni, r贸wni najwi臋kszym pot臋gom 艣wiatowym. Tylko musimy w to uwierzy膰. I fakty s膮 naprawd臋 po naszej stronie.

Je艣li m贸wimy o bezpiecze艅stwie zewn臋trznym, ten priorytet bezpiecze艅stwa europejskiego sk艂ada si臋 z siedmiu element贸w. Tak to zaprojektowali艣my na polsk膮 prezydencj臋. Bezpiecze艅stwo zewn臋trzne. Niekt贸rzy uwa偶aj膮, 偶e to jest ekstrawagancja albo jakie艣 takie brutalne napomnienie czy z艂o艣liwo艣膰. Kiedy s艂yszymy, 偶e powinni艣my wydawa膰 by膰 mo偶e 5% na swoje bezpiecze艅stwo. Chc臋 wam powiedzie膰, 偶e to jest taki czas, kiedy na bezpiecze艅stwie Europa nie mo偶e oszcz臋dza膰. M贸wi臋 jako premier kraju, kt贸ry wydaje ju偶 prawie 5% na bezpiecze艅stwo. I chc臋 powiedzie膰, 偶e wydaj臋 te 5% nie na swoje bezpiecze艅stwo tylko, ale na bezpiecze艅stwo ca艂ej Europy. No bo tak si臋 sk艂ada, 偶e to Polska ma t臋 d艂ug膮 granic臋 z Rosj膮, z Bia艂orusi膮 i t臋 przyjazn膮 z Ukrain膮, ale w jakim艣 sensie wojenn膮 granic臋 z Ukrain膮.

Chc臋 wyra藕nie tu podkre艣li膰, wiem, 偶e prezydencja polska nie b臋dzie tutaj o tym rozstrzyga艂a, ale jest to gor膮cy apel do wszystkich, 偶eby odrzuci膰 rutynowe my艣lenie. Je艣li Europa ma przetrwa膰, musi by膰 uzbrojona. To nie jest nasz wyb贸r. Ja nie jestem militaryst膮. Polska jest takim miejscem na Ziemi, gdzie nikt nie ma ochoty na 偶adne powt贸rki z 偶adnej wojny. Ucierpieli艣my w czasie tej straszliwej wojny najbardziej w Europie. Ale mo偶e dlatego tak dobrze rozumiemy, 偶e 偶eby unikn膮膰 tej tragicznej powt贸rki z historii, musimy by膰 wszyscy silni, uzbrojeni, zdeterminowani, silni duchem, ale te偶 silni naszymi zdolno艣ciami obronnymi. Wi臋c nie lekcewa偶cie tego wezwania do 5%. My艣lmy elastycznie, b膮d藕my kreatywni, bo w艂a艣nie dzisiaj trzeba radykalnie zwi臋kszy膰 wydatki na obronno艣膰. Przecie偶 nie na wieki wiek贸w, nie na zawsze. Ale je艣li kiedy艣 powinni艣my zacz膮膰 wydawa膰 wyra藕nie wi臋cej pieni臋dzy jako pa艅stwa narodowe, jako pa艅stwa cz艂onkowskie NATO, ale te偶 jako Unia Europejska jako ca艂o艣膰, to to jest w艂a艣nie dzisiaj.

By膰 mo偶e, i ja m贸wi臋 o tym z pe艂nym przekonaniem jako polski premier, jako Europejczyk te偶 jako historyk, je艣li nie chcemy wydawa膰 tak du偶o pieni臋dzy w przysz艂o艣ci na bezpiecze艅stwo, na zbrojenia, na obron臋, to musimy dzisiaj zainwestowa膰 wi臋cej pieni臋dzy. Dlatego pomy艣lcie powa偶nie o tym. Od tego zale偶y nie tylko przysz艂o艣膰 Ukrainy, regionu, ale ca艂ej Europy. W jakim艣 sensie od tego zale偶y przysz艂o艣膰 ca艂ego 艣wiata, takiego, jaki znamy, od naszych zdolno艣ci do obrony, niezale偶nie od tego, kto chce nam pom贸c, a kto chce nam zaszkodzi膰.

Bezpiecze艅stwo wewn臋trzne. Pami臋tam, jak tutaj z tej m贸wnicy wiele lat temu jako szef Rady Europejskiej przestrzega艂em przed naiwnym podej艣ciem do zagro偶enia nielegaln膮 migracj膮. I w艂a艣nie mi臋dzy innymi cz臋艣膰 sali w tym Parlamencie reagowa艂a czasami z艂o艣ci膮, czasami 艣miechem, kiedy wbrew temu, co niekt贸rzy g艂osili, 偶e Europa powinna by膰 kontynentem bez granic, otwarta na wszystkich nielegalnych i legalnych przybyszy, to wtedy m贸wi艂em, 偶e to jest z kategorii odpowiedzialno艣ci, takiej najwa偶niejszej odpowiedzialno艣ci, jak膮 ma ka偶da w艂adza za bezpieczn膮 granic臋 i bezpieczne terytorium. Je艣li demokracja ma przetrwa膰, je艣li europejskie warto艣ci, o kt贸rych za chwil臋 jeszcze powiem s艂owo, maj膮 przetrwa膰, to nie mo偶e by膰 tak, 偶e demokracja kojarzy膰 si臋 b臋dzie zwyk艂ym ludziom z bezsilno艣ci膮, z bezradno艣ci膮. Je艣li chodzi o te klasyczne dla ka偶dej w艂adzy zadania, jakimi s膮 obrona granicy i obrona terytorium.

Wiecie, dlaczego tak cz臋sto m贸wimy o kryzysie zaufania do tradycyjnej polityki w Europie? Wiecie dlaczego tak cz臋sto do g艂osu dochodz膮 polityczni szamani albo polityczni lunatycy, m贸wi膮c, 偶e tradycyjny model europejskiej demokracji jest do niczego, jest do wyrzucenia, bo nie dajemy rady z zabezpieczeniem granicy europejskiej i terytorium. Bo rzeczywi艣cie bardzo wiele z艂ego zdarzy艂o si臋, bardzo wiele bezradno艣ci towarzyszy艂o dzia艂aniom albo raczej brakowi dzia艂ania ze strony rz膮d贸w demokratycznych.

Chc臋 powiedzie膰, 偶e mo偶na sobie poradzi膰 z problemem nielegalnej imigracji i szerzej z problemami dotycz膮cymi bezpiecze艅stwa wewn臋trznego Europy, bez nacjonalistycznych, ksenofobicznych hase艂. Chcia艂bym, 偶eby w tej dziedzinie, w bezpiecze艅stwie wewn臋trznym, podobnie jak w bezpiecze艅stwie zewn臋trznym, ta tradycyjna demokracja oparta na tradycyjnych europejskich warto艣ciach: wolno艣膰 jednostki, poszanowanie praw mniejszo艣ci, wolno艣膰 s艂owa, rz膮dy prawa, 偶ycie publiczne wolne od korupcji, polityka wolna od wszechw艂adzy oligarch贸w, 偶eby ci wszyscy, kt贸rzy tymi warto艣ciami si臋 kieruj膮, pokazali te偶 si艂臋 i zdecydowanie wtedy, kiedy trzeba broni膰 naszych granic, naszego terytorium, naszego bezpiecze艅stwa. Demokracja musi na nowo sta膰 si臋 silna. Unia Europejska musi sta膰 si臋 synonimem si艂y, etyki, moralno艣ci, praw, ale tak偶e si艂y. W polityce kto艣 bezsilny jest 偶a艂osny, jest godny pogardy.

Bezpiecze艅stwo informacyjne. Brzmi tajemniczo, ale wiecie, o czym m贸wi臋. Nie mo偶emy by膰 bezradni wobec k艂amstwa, wobec dezinformacji, szczeg贸lnie teraz, kiedy k艂amstwo i dezinformacja sta艂y si臋 narz臋dziem, broni膮 w r臋kach przede wszystkim tego, kt贸ry zaatakowa艂 Ukrain臋 i kt贸ry zagra偶a ca艂ej Unii Europejskiej. Szanuj膮c wolno艣膰 s艂owa, i tutaj musimy by膰 absolutnie pryncypialni, musimy znale藕膰 metody, aby uniemo偶liwi膰 ingerowanie, destruowanie naszej demokracji, naszych wybor贸w przez przede wszystkim te rosyjskie fabryki k艂amstwa i dezinformacji. Bezpiecze艅stwo bezwzgl臋dnie w tej sferze informacji musi te偶 dotyczy膰 ochrony naszych dzieci, naszych wnuk贸w przed przemoc膮, k艂amstwem, pogard膮 wobec innego cz艂owieka. To jest naprawd臋 przedmiot bardzo g艂臋bokiej refleksji. Ja wiem, jakie to jest trudne zadanie nie wpa艣膰 w pu艂apk臋 cenzury, ogranicze艅 wolno艣ci s艂owa, a r贸wnocze艣nie nie by膰 bezbronnym wobec agresora, kt贸ry informacji u偶ywa jako bezwzgl臋dnej broni. Tak jak u偶ywa migrant贸w na polskiej granicy jako bezwzgl臋dnej broni przeciwko europejskiej demokracji.

Bezpiecze艅stwo w gospodarce. Przecie偶 konkurencja, wolny rynek to s膮 europejskie wynalazki. One wyemigrowa艂y te偶 do Ameryki. Ale przecie偶 nic nie stoi na przeszkodzie, 偶eby Europa znowu sta艂a si臋 tym miejscem, gdzie gospodarka jest najbardziej kreatywna, najbardziej konkurencyjna. To tak偶e zadanie Parlamentu Europejskiego. Nie chc臋 tu nikogo napomina膰, ale wydaje si臋, 偶e stoicie przed wielkim wyzwaniem jako Parlament, jako ca艂o艣膰, niezale偶nie od idei, jakimi si臋 kierujecie, i niezale偶nie od rutyny,听bo przecie偶, ja wiem, instytucje europejskie, w tym Parlament, w jakim艣 sensie polska prezydencja, my traktatowo jeste艣my powo艂ani do regulacji. Naszym zadaniem, formalnie rzecz bior膮c, Waszym zadaniem jest regulowanie, wprowadzanie nowych praw. Wiem, ile to wysi艂ku i odwagi b臋dzie kosztowa艂o, ale apeluj臋 do Was, do Waszej wyobra藕ni., b膮d藕cie w tej kadencji Parlamentem, kt贸ry zdob臋dzie si臋 na wielki wysi艂ek deregulacji. B膮d藕cie odwa偶ni. Odrzu膰cie rutyn臋. Prezydencja polska, jestem przekonany, tak偶e instytucje europejskie, nie poprzestaniemy ju偶 tylko na czytaniu sprawozda艅 Draghiego, innych ostrze偶e艅, tylko we藕miemy si臋 ostro do roboty. To naprawd臋 b臋dzie wasz pomnik, je艣li b臋dziecie potrafili inaczej ni偶 to by艂o dotychczas, zaproponowa膰 Europie wielk膮 akcj臋 deregulacji. Bo od tego b臋dzie zale偶a艂a nasza konkurencyjno艣膰. B臋dzie zale偶a艂a tak偶e od bezpiecze艅stwa energetycznego.

Nie mo偶na tylko m贸wi膰 o bezpiecze艅stwie energetycznym. To bezpiecze艅stwo energetyczne mia艂o zreszt膮 kilka wymiar贸w. Mia艂em te偶 okazj臋 tu, na tej sali przestrzega膰 wielokrotnie przed uzale偶nieniem energetyki europejskiej od dostaw rosyjskich, z r贸偶nych powod贸w. Nie mam satysfakcji z tego powodu, 偶e mia艂em tutaj 100% racji. Chcia艂bym, 偶eby艣cie pami臋tali wszyscy o tej lekcji, niezale偶nie od pogl膮d贸w politycznych. Niezale偶no艣膰, suwerenno艣膰 Europy wprost zale偶y tak偶e od niezale偶no艣ci i suwerenno艣ci energetycznej. Niech nikt nie my艣li w kategoriach typu: sko艅czy si臋 wojna w Ukrainie, zako艅czy si臋 agresja rosyjska wobec Ukrainy, wr贸cimy do biznesu tak jak kiedy艣 i b臋dziemy znowu uzale偶niali Europ臋 od rosyjskich dostaw. To si臋 musi sko艅czy膰 raz na zawsze, bo to uzale偶nienie mi臋dzy innymi doprowadzi艂o do tej wojny. To musi by膰 jasne ju偶 dla ka偶dego w Europie. Bezpiecze艅stwo energetyczne, i tutaj powiem kilka s艂贸w niepopularnych, przynajmniej w niekt贸rych 艂awach tutaj. Ale bezpiecze艅stwo energetyczne to te偶 konkretne zadania, kt贸re spowoduj膮, 偶e energia w Europie nie b臋dzie najdro偶sza, je艣li nie najta艅sza, to por贸wnywalna z innymi pot臋gami gospodarczymi. S艂uchajcie, dosy膰 ju偶 tych niesko艅czonej ilo艣ci sprawozda艅, artyku艂贸w, komentarzy, narad, rad europejskich temu po艣wi臋conych, Waszych debat. My po prostu musimy uczciwie sobie powiedzie膰, 偶e niekt贸re regulacje europejskie doprowadzi艂y obiektywnie do tego, 偶e cena energii w Europie, w niekt贸rych krajach europejskich, jest nieakceptowalnie wysoka. Jak Wy chcecie konkurowa膰 z gospodark膮 ameryka艅sk膮 czy chi艅sk膮, je艣li b臋dziemy mieli trzykrotnie dro偶sz膮 energi臋? Je艣li dzisiaj, nie s膮dz臋, 偶eby na tej sali ktokolwiek ju偶 w tej chwili kwestionowa艂 potrzeb臋 niezwyk艂ej, bo to jest te偶 europejski wielki dorobek, takiej europejskiej dba艂o艣ci o 艣rodowisko naturalne i o klimat, bo wiemy, jak straszne konsekwencje czekaj膮 planet臋, je艣li nie b臋dziemy tutaj odwa偶ni i zdeterminowani. Ale i tutaj jest to ale, Europa nie mo偶e przegra膰 konkurencji globalnej, nie mo偶e sta膰 si臋 kontynentem ludzi i idei naiwnych. Je艣li zbankrutujemy, to nikt ju偶 nie b臋dzie dba艂 o 艣rodowisko naturalne na 艣wiecie, Wi臋c bardzo prosz臋, 偶eby艣my rzetelnie podeszli do pe艂nego i bardzo krytycznego przegl膮du wszystkich regulacji, tak偶e tych wynikaj膮cych z Zielonego 艁adu. I 偶eby艣my naprawd臋 potrafili nie tylko wskaza膰, ale tak偶e zmieni膰 wszystkie te zapisy, kt贸re mog膮 doprowadzi膰 do wysokich cen, jeszcze wy偶szych cen energii. Przed nami jest na przyk艂ad kwestia ETS2. Wysokie ceny energii mog膮 zmie艣膰 niejeden rz膮d demokratyczny w Unii Europejskiej. Naprawd臋 zdajcie sobie z tego spraw臋. Te偶 niezale偶nie od tego, czy jeste艣cie z prawicy, lewicy, z centrum, 偶e to nie jest tak, 偶e ludzie nie chc膮, aby 艣rodowisko naturalne by艂o bezpieczne w Europie, ale ludzie te偶 nie chc膮, aby Europa sta艂a si臋 miejscem, gdzie energia jest najdro偶sza, bo to b臋dzie dotyka艂o ich bezpo艣rednio. Wi臋c prosz臋 te偶 o g艂臋bok膮, krytyczn膮 i odwa偶n膮 refleksj臋 na temat konsekwencji wprowadzenia w tak szybkim tempie ETS2. Bardzo przed tym przestrzegam. I uwierzcie do艣wiadczonemu politykowi, i narodowemu, i europejskiemu: konsekwencje polityczne - nie powiem, 偶e s膮 nieprzewidywalne - s膮 upiornie przewidywalne, je艣li b臋dziemy brn臋li dalej tak bezrefleksyjnie w dzia艂ania, kt贸rych konsekwencj膮 b臋dzie jeszcze dro偶sze energia. Naprawd臋 musimy si臋 ogarn膮膰 w tej kwestii.

Bezpiecze艅stwo 偶ywno艣ciowe - ju偶 chyba te偶 wszyscy rozumiej膮, ostatnie lata pokaza艂y to bardzo wyra藕nie, 偶e rolnictwo - polskie dla Polski, europejskie dla ca艂ej Europy - to jest nasz skarb. B膮d藕cie te偶 tutaj bardzo czujni. B膮d藕cie odpowiedzialni. Bezpiecze艅stwo 偶ywno艣ciowe Europy to nie jest tylko na tyle, na ile to mo偶liwe, samowystarczalno艣膰 Europy, je艣li chodzi o produkty rolne. To jest tak, 偶e to najlepsze rolnictwo na 艣wiecie, ale musi by膰 zr贸wnowa偶one. Pami臋tajcie o tym. Tutaj zreszt膮 musz臋 powiedzie膰, 偶e Komisja szybko zareagowa艂a, bardzo za to dzi臋kuj臋, by艂em jednym z tych, kt贸rzy sygnalizowali potrzeb臋 szybkiego dzia艂ania, tak, aby zdj膮膰 niekt贸re ci臋偶ary z europejskich rolnik贸w, z europejskiego rolnictwa, 偶eby jednak zamieni膰 nakazy na zach臋ty.

S艂uchajcie, my b臋dziemy skutecznie bronili naszej natury, je艣li ludzie b臋d膮 przekonani, 偶e chc膮 tego. Je艣li Europa, Unia Europejska, instytucje europejskie i nasze dzia艂ania b臋d膮 si臋 kojarzy艂y ludziom - i czy to jest rolnictwo, czy energetyka - z ci臋偶arami i nakazami, to stracimy tych ludzi jako armi臋 tych, od kt贸rych听de facto zale偶y przysz艂o艣膰 tak偶e naszego 艣rodowiska. B膮d藕my tutaj mo偶liwie zdroworozs膮dkowi. To jest m贸j apel do wszystkich. Wiem, macie swoje idee. Niekt贸rzy g艂臋boko wierz膮 nawet w jakie艣 takie twarde doktryny czy ideologie, ale uwierzcie mi, te偶 przemawia przeze mnie do艣wiadczenie. Dla milion贸w Europejek i Europejczyk贸w najcenniejsz膮 cech膮 polityka nie jest jego nami臋tna wiara w jak膮艣 ide臋, tylko zdrowy rozs膮dek, odwaga w my艣leniu i odrzucenie rutyny, i naprawd臋 zdrowy rozs膮dek. To jest bezcenne w dzisiejszych czasach.

Si贸dmy wymiar to bezpiecze艅stwo zdrowotne. Tu nie trzeba niczego dodawa膰. Pandemia pokaza艂a bardzo wyra藕nie, ale te偶 inne choroby, na przyk艂ad to, o czym coraz cz臋艣ciej si臋 m贸wi, czyli zagro偶enie zdrowia psychicznego najm艂odszych. I to jest nie tylko dzia艂anie w dziedzinie zdrowia, ale te偶 to, o czym m贸wi艂em wcze艣niej, czyli kwestia zabezpieczenia naszych najm艂odszych przed fatalnym wp艂ywem w przestrzeni wirtualnej. Nie mo偶emy przechodzi膰 obok tego oboj臋tnie. My ju偶 wiemy, to ju偶 s膮 naukowe do艣wiadczenia, kt贸re m贸wi膮, co si臋 dzieje z m贸zgiem m艂odego cz艂owieka, co si臋 dzieje z m贸zgiem dziecka, kiedy jest poddany w spos贸b tak bardzo masywny temu z艂u, kt贸re tak jest wszechobecne w tej chwili w sieci. Pami臋tajmy o tym. Nasza przysz艂o艣膰 b臋dzie zale偶a艂a od kondycji psychicznej tych, kt贸rzy dzisiaj maj膮 5, 10 lat. To jest nasz przecie偶 najwi臋kszy skarb.

Kochani, chcia艂bym bardzo, 偶eby wszyscy bez wyj膮tku uwierzyli na nowo w siebie i, wspieraj膮c si臋 i k艂贸c膮c, i 偶eby艣my odbudowali t臋 wsp贸lnot臋 i wiar臋 w t臋 wsp贸lnot臋. Je艣li chodzi o bezpieczn膮 Europ臋, i na tym ko艅cz臋, nie dyskutujmy mo偶e dzisiaj o przysz艂ej armii europejskiej. Wiecie dobrze, 偶e gdyby艣my dzisiaj mieli armi臋 europejsk膮, to kluczowe pytanie by艂oby, kto stoi na jej czele, kto w jakim kierunku te wojska europejskie by wysy艂a艂? Intuicja mi m贸wi, 偶e gdyby o tym decydowa艂 Budapeszt, to ta armia europejska posz艂aby w innym kierunku ni偶 wtedy, gdyby o tym decydowa艂a Warszawa. Wi臋c nie r贸bmy sobie jakich艣 szczeg贸lnych iluzji, ale b膮d藕my praktyczni. Wszyscy bez wyj膮tku w Europie mo偶emy si臋 chyba zgodzi膰 co do tego, 偶e europejskie pieni膮dze, europejskie wysi艂ki powinny zbudowa膰 bezpieczn膮 granic臋 Unii Europejskiej, zewn臋trzn膮, bezpieczn膮 granic臋. Dlatego b臋d臋 namawia艂 - nie tylko dlatego, 偶e mamy dzisiaj prezydencj臋 polsk膮 w Europie - do tego, aby traktowa膰 projekt polski, litewski, fi艅ski, budow臋 tej tarczy Wsch贸d, a wi臋c granicy bezpiecznej od agresji i m贸wimy nie tylko o twardej infrastrukturze, ale te偶 o wykorzystaniu najnowszych technik sprawdzonych ju偶 w czasie wojny ukrai艅skiej, jako wsp贸lny obowi膮zek. I chyba nie ma takiej partii tu, w tym Parlamencie, kt贸ra by kwestionowa艂a potrzeb臋 obrony przed potencjaln膮 agresj膮 naszej wsp贸lnej granicy. Chyba nie ma nikogo na tej sali, kto kwestionowa艂by potrzeb臋 obrony europejskiego nieba przed zagro偶eniem, potencjalnym zagro偶eniem rakietowym.

Jest wiele wsp贸lnych przedsi臋wzi臋膰, kt贸re nie wymagaj膮 rewolucji ustrojowej, tylko odwagi, zdrowego rozs膮dku i determinacji. Wiem, 偶e broni膮 si臋 niekt贸re pa艅stwa narodowe przed dodatkowym finansowaniem europejskich potrzeb obronnych. Niekt贸rym bardzo nie podobaj膮 si臋 pomys艂y obligacji, zaci膮gania d艂ugu. S艂uchajcie, powiem szczerze, w艂a艣ciwie nie powinno nas za bardzo interesowa膰, jak膮 metod臋 przyjmiemy, aby finansowa膰 tak偶e paneuropejskie, og贸lnoeuropejskie projekty obronne. Powinno nas wreszcie zainteresowa膰, powinni艣my wreszcie to g艂o艣no powiedzie膰, 偶e nie ma dla tego alternatywy. Europa musi zacz膮膰 si臋 broni膰 sama, a wi臋c musi zacz膮膰 na to wydawa膰 tak偶e europejskie pieni膮dze. To nie jest tylko to by膰 mo偶e niezb臋dne na czas wojny 5% w wymiarze narodowym, ale to jest tak偶e wydanie niepor贸wnywalnie wi臋kszych pieni臋dzy, ni偶 to zaplanowali艣my jako Unia Europejska, jako Europa.

Dyskutujcie o technikach w parlamentach narodowych i tutaj, o technikach finansowych. Prosz臋 bardzo, ale niech nikt ju偶 nie kwestionuje tej potrzeby. Istnieje bardzo du偶a przestrze艅 wsp贸lna, kt贸ra wymaga膰 b臋dzie wsp贸lnego finansowania. S艂uchajcie, nasza przysz艂o艣膰, i ko艅cz臋, dzi臋kuj臋 za cierpliwo艣膰, Pani 笔谤锄别飞辞诲苍颈肠锄膮肠补. Nasza przysz艂o艣膰 rozegra si臋 w naszych g艂owach i w naszych sercach. Przywo艂a艂a艣, droga Roberto, s艂owa polskiego papie偶a. Dla nas one s膮 wa偶ne. Nie tylko to, co powiedzia艂e艣 o przysz艂o艣ci. A my pami臋tamy w Polsce s艂owa, kt贸re sta艂y si臋 藕r贸d艂em si艂y i zwyci臋stwa Solidarno艣ci, a wi臋c Europy te偶 w jakim艣 sensie. W czasie nocy komunizmu w Polsce. Be not afraid. Nie l臋kajcie si臋. Takie s艂owa us艂yszeli艣my i one by艂y 藕r贸d艂em si艂y. Wi臋c dzisiaj chcia艂bym to powt贸rzy膰, cytuj膮c jeszcze raz te s艂owa Be not afraid. Wszystko rozegra si臋 w Waszych g艂owach. Wszystko rozegra si臋 w naszych sercach. Przysz艂o艣膰 jest naprawd臋 w naszych r臋kach, nie chi艅skich, nie rosyjskich, nie ameryka艅skich - w naszych r臋kach. Ja to polskie bia艂o czerwone serce daj臋 Wam wszystkim, bo jestem przekonany, 偶e b臋dziemy razem pracowali na rzecz wielkiej Europy. Tak, kochani, Europe was, is and will always be great. 顿锄颈臋办耻箩臋. Thank you.

听听Dubravka 艩uica, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, dear Prime Minister, honourable Members, it won't be easy to speak now after this speech, but I will try my best.

The Polish Presidency comes at a time when the Union is facing multiple challenges. We are experiencing a time of geostrategic insecurity, concrete external and internal security threats, and less predictable international relations all together.

Yes, this is also a time of clear opportunities for us to improve our resilience, our unity, and to emerge stronger, as already was said by the Prime Minister, in a world of multilateral cooperation, which is no longer a standard norm.

Dear Prime Minister Tusk, let me thank you, on behalf of the entire European Commission, for outlining the pertinent priorities of your Presidency. It is very reassuring to see that they are very much in line with and complimentary on the concrete steps of this new Commission. We are taking them to deliver for the present and to prepare a stronger Union for the future.听Coordinated action is the way forward for Europe, and it is very good that we are on the same page when it comes to addressing fundamental challenges we are facing together.

Russia's brutal war of aggression in Ukraine will soon enter its fourth year. We need to continue to stand steadfast and united behind Ukraine, while keeping the pressure on Russia through the 16th package of sanctions. We count on the Polish Presidency, as the honest broker, to steer this work.

The very volatile situation in the Middle East will remain another focus. Regarding Gaza, we will start developing a dedicated reconstruction plan for Gaza with the support of international partners, including our partners in the Gulf. We will also take forward a multi-year support programme for the Palestinian Authority, which is anchored in reforms to help pave the way for the two-state solution.

Regarding the situation in the Middle East and the war in Ukraine, on both matters, we will work with President Trump and the new United States administration.

Allow me to comment on the Commission deliverables and expectations under the seven security dimensions which you have addressed.

First, on defence and security. There should be no doubt that our ambition must match the scale of the threats. Our white paper on the future of European defence is planned for March. We look forward to the leaders' retreat on 3听February, which will provide the necessary guidance and inspiration to this work. We regard with regard to the European Defence Industry Programme, it is very good to know that we count on the Polish Presidency and on this House to reach an agreement by 30 June. This is the date when the current act in support of ammunition production expires.

We will also soon present the Preparedness Union Strategy, inspired by Sauli Niinist枚's insightful report. We will also work with you to strengthen our internal security, and our plan is to present a strategy soon.

As part of the enforcement of the Digital Services Act, a relevant component is the fight against child sexual abuse. In this regard, we need to finalise the work on the regulation.

Second priority, protection of people and borders. In December, the Commission presented the Communication on Countering Hybrid Threats from the Weaponisation of Migration and Strengthening Security at the European Union's External Borders. Ahead of the upcoming European Council on 20 and 21听March, we plan to adopt the proposal for a new legal framework on returns of irregular migrants. This new framework is vital in order to achieve workable paths of legal migration, that we need to fill labour shortages at all skill levels.

We count on the sense of urgency and shared purpose of this House and of the Member States. We need to advance the interinstitutional negotiations soon, once the proposal has been adopted.

On safe third countries, our review of the concept will be concluded by June. We are also working on a list of safe third countries and safe countries of origin at Union level. There is also the opportunity for the Polish Presidency and this House to soon agree on the phasing in of the entry-exit system, as proposed in December last year.

Regarding our resistance to foreign interference and disinformation, with the European Democracy Shield, we will step up the fight against disinformation, foreign interference and foreign information manipulation. We are grateful that we can build on the very solid work of this House through the two subsequent special committees on foreign interference and disinformation in the last term of the European 合法博彩网站. Your stocktaking, fact finding and recommendations constitute a very useful expertise and guidance for our own work.

Regarding ensuring security and freedom of business. The Commission will adopt a competitive compass which will build on the Draghi Report. The first pillar aims at closing the innovation gap with the United States and China. The second one is about decarbonisation and competitiveness and clean industrial deal. And the third pillar is on increasing our economic security and reducing dependencies.

Another important deliverable is the omnibus simplification package on sustainable finance, which is also part of the 'first 100听days' initiative. It is crucial to respond to the request of the industry to lighten the regulatory load. A streamlining of the legislation depends on the support of the Member States and of this 合法博彩网站. Let me recall that better lawmaking is a joint task and that this covers the entire legislative process.

We should also not forget the crucial role of human capital for the European Union's economy. In this regard, we will adopt an initiative to deliver a true Union of skills. Central to this will be to embed lifelong learning into education and careers.

Regarding the energy transition, we will also soon adopt an action plan on affordable energy prices to help households, enterprises and industries through the transition. This deliverable is complementary to the Clean Industry Deal and it is a key item of our competitiveness initiatives.

Two other key initiatives under the Polish Presidency will be our roadmap to phase out Russian fossil fuels, and our proposal on the revision and extension of the Gas Storage Regulation. Both initiatives will help to reduce our dependency on energy imports. We trust in the dedication, expertise and steer of the Polish Presidency in the Council on these two important files.

On a competitive and resilient agriculture, we have listened closely to our farmers over the past year. This was a most worthwhile exercise, as our farmers play an important role in securing the sustainable production of competitive, quality food, and at the same time in strengthening our autonomy from food imports. We will adopt soon our vision for agriculture and food. It will be the basis for the post-2027 common agricultural policy. The CAP is going to have to continue recognising the crucial role of our farmers, not only in respect of the production of quality food, but also of their valuable work in preserving the environment and the rural cultural landscape.

The seventh and the final of the Presidency security dimensions is health security. Last week we presented an action plan on the cybersecurity of hospitals and healthcare providers. We are on a good path when it comes to completing our work on the crucial safeguarding of our critical infrastructure. It goes without saying that the whole of infrastructure approach also covers healthcare services. They matter to all citizens wherever they live.

Let us also recall some unfinished business regarding or addressing the health priority. A Critical Medicines Act will soon complement the pharmaceutical package. Also here, the strengthening of the security of supply in the pharmaceutical domain is a key security item.

Dear Prime Minister Tusk, honourable Members, the Commission looks forward to a successful cooperation with the Polish presidency on all matters. The current term will allow us to pave the way for future presidencies of the Council. In particular, on the post-2027 multiannual financial framework and as a follow up of the pre-enlargement policy reviews. Unity and our capability to act are vital ingredients for achieving greater security.

Thank you very much for your attention and I look forward to your debate.

听听Manfred Weber, on behalf of the PPE Group. 鈥� Madam President, Commissioners 鈥� especially the Polish Commissioner, I would say to Prime听Minister Tusk, dear Donald, in 2022 when you handed me the reins of the EPP in Rotterdam, you said in your speech there in Rotterdam: 'I return to Polish politics to win the battle for democracy, the rule of law and a European Poland'. It was a tough fight, and you won. Poland is again in the heart of Europe. You ended the PIS government. You brought the rule of law back to Poland. You unlocked EUR 137 billion in European funds for the Polish people, and you have brought Poland back to the decisive tables in the world and in Europe.

Kaczynski can now peacefully retire, dear friends! Now, the next six months will focus on the future, on improving life 鈥� with better health care for everyone 鈥� on innovation, on creating well-paid jobs for the citizens of Europe. Not the craziness of extremists, but the daily expectations and the dreams of normal citizens will again lead Poland and Europe.

The contrast to the previous presidency is also obvious. 脫rban's presidency is behind us. Thank God. It was only an ego trip for Viktor. A few days after his famous trip to Moscow, Putin attacked the children's hospital in Kiev. That was really a great peace mission, I have to say! The Polish Presidency, dear friends, has just started but we can already feel the change. Donald, you spoke about these disruptive forms of politics in today's world, and especially in such a moment I think it's important that we have leadership who have proved already their credibility.

I want to remind us of a few of these things. When Macron and others treated Russia as a strategic partner, you saw already the reality that Russia is a strategic enemy who hates our European way of life. When my country, Germany, naively backed Nord Stream 2 鈥� and you know I was on your side in this subject 鈥� you were already calling for a European Energy Union to break free from Putin's grip.

While Chancellor Scholz is only speaking about the Zeitenwende, Poland has massively invested, under your leadership, in defence and is today the eastern shield for Europe. While S谩nchez was neglecting the need for stricter border control, even building fences if needed, you were putting successfully the weaponisation of migration on the Council's table. Thank you for doing so.

Today, you tell us it's time to end naivety in Europe. A new axis of tyranny is forming: Iranian missiles strike Ukrainian cities, North Korean soldiers are marching across European soil, and Russia is fully in a war economy. We need a security鈥慺irst approach. That's your main message. Europe has to wake up. Security first when it is about trade, when it is about developing new technologies, when it is about migration policy.

We will safeguard our democracies. Romania delivers a clear task for us. Anyone who wants to earn money in Europe has to respect our rules. Elon Musk must learn that decisions on the DSA and DMA are not done in his headquarters, nor in the White House 鈥� only here in this European 合法博彩网站. Don't get me wrong: we as the EPP Group want to offer dealmaker Trump a real deal. With China rising, economies struggling and all the world in turmoil, we need cooperation on the transatlantic level more than ever before.

Finally, a lot is ahead of us and it will not be easy at all. But J贸zef Tischner, the Polish priest, philosopher and Solidarno艣膰 movement thinker, once said, and I quote: 'hope must always match the challenge. The greater the challenge, the stronger the hope.' Today we place great hope in the Polish Presidency. We need more Polish thinking in Europe: facing hardships with strength, facing challenges with ambition, facing autocratic threats with a strong will to live in freedom and democracy. Thank God the European way of life speaks Polish, dear friends!

听听Iratxe Garc铆a P茅rez, en nombre del Grupo S&D. 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, se帽or primer ministro Tusk, bienvenido al Parlamento Europeo. Hoy comienza un nuevo cap铆tulo para Europa bajo la Presidencia polaca en el Consejo, una Presidencia que, bajo su liderazgo, debe tener el potencial de ser una br煤jula moral y pol铆tica en los tiempos de desaf铆os sin precedentes que tenemos.

Se帽or Tusk, la historia de Polonia es la historia de la resistencia: es el esp铆ritu de quienes lucharon por su libertad en los momentos m谩s oscuros; es el coraje del pueblo polaco durante la ocupaci贸n nazi; es el levantamiento del gueto de Varsovia y la valent铆a de Solidarno艣膰, aquel movimiento que mostr贸 al mundo que la fuerza de las personas unidas puede cambiar el curso de la historia. Este es el esp铆ritu de resistencia que hoy necesitamos y que hoy queremos abordar desde la Uni贸n Europea.

Pero me va a permitir hacer algunas reflexiones, porque he escuchado muy atentamente su discurso y hay una parte importante donde coincido, pero hay unos elementos donde disentimos pol铆ticamente, por supuesto, y creo que eso es algo sano e importante.

Comparto al completo la reflexi贸n sobre la seguridad. Comparto que Europa necesita avanzar en la seguridad en los distintos 谩mbitos a los que usted se ha referido. La seguridad no puede ser 煤nica y exclusivamente la seguridad de la defensa militar frente a las amenazas de las guerras que tiene Europa en todas sus fronteras. Por supuesto, es fundamental y es importante, y estoy de acuerdo en que necesitamos invertir tambi茅n en esa defensa europea, pero seguridad tambi茅n es que un pensionista europeo se levante por las ma帽anas sin la angustia de saber si le van a cortar el gas porque no lo ha podido pagar porque su pensi贸n es insuficiente. Seguridad es que las mujeres en Europa puedan abortar sin el peligro de que algunos Gobiernos las metan en la c谩rcel por ejercer sus derechos. Seguridad es que una madre sepa que su hijo, con independencia del poder econ贸mico, va a poder ir a una universidad p煤blica. Seguridad es que una pareja de homosexuales en Europa pueda recorrer sus calles sin miedo a los insultos y a los ataques. Eso tambi茅n es seguridad.

Eso Europa tambi茅n tiene que tenerlo en cuenta, porque nuestra Uni贸n sobrevivir谩 si seguimos implementando el Pacto Verde, el 煤nico instrumento capaz de garantizar nuestro planeta. Seguridad es que los j贸venes no tengan la preocupaci贸n de si tener hijos o no porque no saben qu茅 planeta les van a dejar para vivir.

Nuestra Uni贸n sobrevivir谩 si lideramos una transici贸n digital al servicio de la verdad, porque la desinformaci贸n y la manipulaci贸n no pueden tener cabida en nuestras sociedades. Nuestra Uni贸n sobrevivir谩 si regulamos los flujos migratorios con responsabilidad y con solidaridad tambi茅n. Nuestra Uni贸n solo sobrevivir谩 si fortalecemos nuestra industria de la defensa y hablamos con una sola voz en las guerras devastadoras como la de Ucrania y como la de Oriente Pr贸ximo.

Tengo una 煤ltima reflexi贸n de regulaci贸n con la que no estoy de acuerdo, se帽or Tusk. 驴Simplificaci贸n para facilitar la puesta en marcha de las decisiones que hemos tomado? Por supuesto. Pero desregulaci贸n no, porque significa dar marcha atr谩s a todos los avances que hemos conseguido trabajando juntas y juntos.

Se帽or Tusk, el himno polaco, como usted bien ha mencionado, expresa unas palabras tan bellas como ciertas: 芦Polonia no morir谩 mientras nosotros vivamos禄. Yo ahora quiero decirle que la Uni贸n Europea tampoco morir谩 mientras las fuerzas democr谩ticas y europe铆stas vivamos y trabajemos juntos y juntas.

听听Anna Bry艂ka, w imieniu grupy PfE. 鈥� Pani Przewodnicz膮ca, Pani Komisarz, Panie Premierze! Zero konkret贸w, zero pomys艂贸w, zero rozwi膮za艅. Te wszystkie okr膮g艂e s艂贸wka, kt贸re Pan teraz wyg艂osi艂, nijak si臋 maj膮 do rzeczywisto艣ci. Pan przedstawia dzi艣 siebie jako zbawc臋 Europy, a przecie偶 to Pan by艂 i jest architektem tego systemu, kt贸ry prowadzi Europ臋 do upadku. Teraz z von der Leyen, a wcze艣niej z Merkel 鈭� wsp贸lnie doprowadzili艣cie do utraty konkurencyjno艣ci, braku bezpiecze艅stwa na ulicach i narastaj膮cej biedy w Europie.

Chce Pan zrewidowa膰 polityk臋 klimatyczn膮? Ale gdzie Pan by艂, kiedy j膮 wdra偶ano? Czy czasem nie by艂 Pan przewodnicz膮cym Rady Europejskiej, a potem szefem Europejskiej Partii Ludowej, bez g艂os贸w kt贸rej tego zielonego wariactwa by nie by艂o. To mi臋dzy innymi Pan, Panie Tusk, skaza艂 w艂asnych rodak贸w na najwy偶sze ceny energii na 艣wiecie. Wpisa艂 Pan w program polskiej prezydencji walk臋 z dezinformacj膮 klimatyczn膮. To w ten spos贸b chcecie teraz walczy膰 z krytykami waszej polityki? To jest ta wasza wolno艣膰 s艂owa? M贸wi艂 Pan o bezpiecze艅stwie granic zewn臋trznych. A gdzie Pan by艂 i Pana formacja, kiedy w obronie Polski i Europy trzeba by艂o wybudowa膰 mur na granicy z Bia艂orusi膮? Przypomn臋: chcieli艣cie wtedy wpu艣ci膰 nielegalnych imigrant贸w i g艂osowali艣cie przeciwko budowie zapory na granicy. Byli艣cie wtedy po stronie Putina i 艁ukaszenki.

Przedstawia si臋 Pan jako przeciwnik paktu o migracji i azylu. A kto straszy艂 w艂asny nar贸d sankcjami za sprzeciw wobec systemu relokacji? Przecie偶 to by艂 Pan. Mo偶e Pan tutaj udawa膰 racjonalnego i rozs膮dnego polityka, ale jest Pan ob艂udnym oszustem. Ursula von der Leyen nama艣ci艂a Pana na polskiego premiera i od tego czasu zachowuje si臋 Pan jak polski namiestnik, jak namiestnik. I od tego czasu zachowuje si臋 Pan jak niemiecki namiestnik w Polsce, bo Panu jest obcy polski interes narodowy. Panie premierze, polski nar贸d i wszyscy wolni ludzie Europy 偶膮daj膮 natychmiastowego wycofania si臋 z europejskiego zielonego 艂adu, obni偶enia cen energii, rozpocz臋cia deportacji nielegalnych imigrant贸w i zagwarantowania wolno艣ci s艂owa i internetu. Skoro jest Pan tutaj taki wa偶ny...

(Przewodnicz膮ca odebra艂a m贸wczyni g艂os)

听听Patryk Jaki, on behalf of the ECR Group. 鈥� Madam President, Prime Minister, Commissioner, Poland has everything that is necessary to lead important processes in Europe. It is in the centre of the continent, so it can build major airports and logistic hubs. It has the most coal, so it can have the cheapest energy. Poland has sea, mountains and rivers so it can become a tourism and trade powerhouse. Poland is also the safest country in Europe according to your data, and we are building the biggest army in the region. Over the last decades, we have been the fastest-growing country on the continent.

Poland also has an impressive history. This year marks 1听000 years of the Kingdom of Poland, during which time we have built the greatest states with the greatest freedom 鈥� religious and political freedom 鈥� and the first constitution in Europe. We have everything we need, but we have one problem ...

...premiera oszusta. Dok艂adnie tak samo jak wy pi臋knie opowiada o wszystkim A to wszystko, co m贸wi艂, razem z wami robi dok艂adnie odwrotnie. I teraz pos艂uchajcie konkret贸w. Ot贸偶 tak 鈥� m贸wi o uniezale偶nieniu si臋 od Rosji, a w zesz艂ym tygodniu wysz艂o, 偶e kupi艂 rosyjski gaz za 26 milion贸w w Warszawie i z listy sankcyjnej 艣ci膮gn膮艂 partnera Gazpromu po fikcyjnej transakcji za 3 z艂ote.

M贸wi o bezpiecze艅stwie i obronie granic przed migracj膮, a realizuje z wami pakt migracyjny i buduje w Polsce 49 centr贸w dla nielegalnych migrant贸w, aby ostatnie bezpieczne miejsce w Europie uczyni膰 na wasz kszta艂t i wasze podobie艅stwo. I jeszcze bezczelnie m贸wi, 偶e przed tym ostrzega艂. Ja sprawdzi艂em g艂osowanie w poprzedniej kadencji Parlamentu Europejskiego. Ot贸偶 wy, partia Donalda Tuska, 偶膮da艂a sankcji na Polsk臋 za obron臋 w艂asnych granic przed migracj膮. To jest wstyd i ha艅ba.

M贸wi o innowacyjno艣ci w Unii Europejskiej, a rozwali艂 wybitne zespo艂y zajmuj膮ce si臋 sztuczn膮 inteligencj膮 i projekt reaktora j膮drowego trzeciej generacji, jedyny taki w Europie.

M贸wi o szacunku do wolno艣ci, a przygotowa艂 projekt ustawy, 偶e jego urz臋dnik b臋dzie m贸g艂 zdejmowa膰 dowolne tre艣ci z internetu dok艂adnie tak jak komuni艣ci w Chinach. Jedynej najwi臋kszej stacji informacyjnej w Polsce nigdy nie wpu艣ci艂 na swoj膮 konferencj臋 prasow膮. I oni zupe艂nie wprost rozmawiaj膮 o tym, jak pozbawi膰 j膮j licencji.

Do tego m艂odego cz艂owieka, kt贸ry krytykowa艂 ich za nieudolno艣膰 podczas pomocy powodzianom, po prostu przyszli rano i go aresztowali. To tak kocha t臋 wolno艣膰, o kt贸rej m贸wi艂. Prosz臋 Pa艅stwa, m贸wi o konkurencyjno艣ci gospodarki, a realizuje z wami t臋 g艂upi膮 zielon膮 ideologi臋, kt贸ra spowodowa艂a, 偶e mamy najwy偶sze ceny energii w Europie. Do tego nie ma odwagi, 偶eby zrobi膰 to samo co na przyk艂ad S艂owacja i powiedzie膰: zawiesimy ETS2. Nie tylko pi臋knie m贸wi膰, ale wykorzysta膰 polsk膮 prezydencj臋 do tego, 偶eby co艣 dobrego zrobi膰 dla Polak贸w i dla Europejczyk贸w.

I wreszcie m贸wi o praworz膮dno艣ci, czyli o pa艅stwie opartym na prawie. I musicie to us艂ysze膰. Prawem to on sobie wytar艂 buty. Pi臋knie m贸wi艂, prosz臋 Pa艅stwa, o potrzebie jedno艣ci. A chcecie zobaczy膰, jak ta jedno艣膰 wygl膮da w Polsce? Ot贸偶 dla konkurencji politycznej og艂osi艂 Norymberg臋 鈥� to s膮 dok艂adne jego s艂owa 鈥� czyli wieszanie nazist贸w.

Nast臋pnie si艂膮 przej膮艂 prokuratur臋. W polskim systemie jest tak, 偶e potrzeba zgody prezydenta, aby zmieni膰 prokuratora krajowego. Ale on si臋 tym w og贸le nie przejmowa艂. Nawet prezydenta nie zapyta艂, tylko po prostu u偶y艂 si艂y. Dok艂adnie to samo zrobi艂 z mediami publicznymi. S膮d Najwy偶szy i Trybuna艂 Konstytucyjny nakaza艂y premierowi przywr贸cenie legalnego prokuratora krajowego. Ale on w og贸le zlekcewa偶y艂 te wyroki. I teraz go zacytuj臋: 鈥濸ope艂nimy czyny, kt贸re wed艂ug niekt贸rych autorytet贸w prawnych b臋d膮 niezgodne lub nie do ko艅ca zgodne z zapisami prawa鈥�. I dalej: 鈥濨臋d臋 je jednak podejmowa艂 z pe艂n膮 艣wiadomo艣ci膮, 偶e nie wszystkie b臋d膮 odpowiada艂y kryterium praworz膮dno艣ci鈥�. Koniec cytatu.

Ja chcia艂em was zapyta膰: czy znacie drugiego premiera w Europie, kt贸ry zupe艂nie wprost m贸wi, 偶e 艂amie prawo i dalej b臋dzie to robi艂? Wi臋c to jest tak: aresztuje ludzi bez zachowania ich prawa do uczciwego procesu. Lekcewa偶y immunitety. Dw贸ch pos艂贸w aresztowa艂 w Pa艂acu Prezydenckim. To samo zrobi艂 z pos艂em, kt贸ry mia艂 immunitet Rady Europy. Ostatni膮 osob膮, kt贸ra przed nim to zrobi艂a, by艂 W艂adimir Putin. Zn臋ca艂 si臋 nad paniami, kt贸re aresztowa艂, aby wymusi膰 zeznania oponent贸w. Nigdy za nic nie karanym kobietom da艂 status 鈥瀗iebezpieczne鈥�, dok艂adnie jak terrorystom. I panowie rozbierali je i ogl膮dali je, jak si臋 k膮pi膮. To jest, prosz臋 Pa艅stwa, ha艅ba. I potwierdzi艂 to w specjalnym raporcie rzecznik praw obywatelskich. Ja chc臋 was zapyta膰, gdzie s膮 teraz obro艅cy praw kobiet?

Do tego w Polsce partie finansowane s膮 z pieni臋dzy z bud偶etu. Premier zabra艂 wszystkie pieni膮dze swojej g艂贸wnej konkurencji, wi臋c w wyborach prezydenckich b臋dzie tak: jego partia dostanie oko艂o 50 milion贸w, a konkurencja, kt贸ra jest od niego wi臋ksza dok艂adnie nic. Tak on traktuje t臋 r贸wno艣膰, o kt贸rej m贸wi艂. S膮d orzek艂, 偶e z艂ama艂 prawo, i nakaza艂 mu wyp艂aci膰 pieni膮dze opozycji. Ale on m贸wi, 偶e tego nie zrobi, i lekcewa偶y wyroki s膮d贸w.

I generalnie jego rz膮dy to jest codzienna kronika kryminalna. I oczywi艣cie to nadu偶ywanie w艂adzy, nieprzestrzeganie prawa i nieprzestrzeganie wyrok贸w s膮d贸w w niczym mu nie przeszkadza, 偶eby codziennie ubiera膰 si臋 w str贸偶a prawa. On nauczy艂 si臋 tego dok艂adnie tutaj od pana Reyndersa, kt贸ry 鈥� jak si臋 dzisiaj okaza艂o 鈥� rano szed艂 pra膰 pieni膮dze, 偶eby po po艂udniu poucza膰 Polsk臋, jak przestrzega膰 prawa.

Wi臋c, prosz臋 Pa艅stwa, 偶eby by艂a jasno艣膰: Unia Europejska nie ma w tej sprawie 偶adnej kompetencji. Ja nie oczekuj臋 偶adnej interwencji. Chc臋 tylko, 偶eby ludzie wiedzieli, jakimi jeste艣cie hipokrytami. Chc臋, 偶eby us艂yszeli o podw贸jnych standardach...

听听Val茅rie Hayer, au nom du groupe Renew. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Madame la Commissaire, Monsieur le Premier Ministre, alors moi, je rentre de Pologne. Je suis all茅e 脿 Varsovie la semaine derni猫re avec les membres de mon groupe. Et ce qu鈥檕n a constat茅 sur le terrain, c鈥檈st que, effectivement, Monsieur le Premier Ministre, c'est que, chaque jour, avec votre coalition, qui comprend des membres de Renew,听vous 锚tes mobilis茅s pour restaurer l鈥櫭﹖at de droit, qui a 茅t茅 d茅tricot茅 pendant des ann茅es par vos pr茅d茅cesseurs. Nous savons combien c'est chose difficile et nous serons 脿 vos c么t茅s pour, jour apr猫s jour, restaurer cet 茅tat de droit, qui a 茅t茅 pi茅tin茅 par le PiS.

Vous le savez aussi 鈥撎齤鈥檃i d茅j脿 eu l鈥檕ccasion de vous le dire听鈥�, au sein de cet h茅micycle, chez les pro-europ茅ens, m锚me si nous avons 茅videmment des divergences de vues, il y a 茅norm茅ment d鈥檃ttentes vis-脿-vis de votre pr茅sidence, Monsieur le Premier Ministre. Parce que, oui, vous avez ramen茅 la Pologne en Europe, et que, pour le mandat qui s鈥檕uvre, tout est 脿 faire. Si le Parlement est en ordre de marche, nos attentes envers les 脡tats sont, elles, immenses.

Monsieur le Premier Ministre, nous vivons, vous le savez, des temps instables. Alors, une question sur notre leadership mondial: est-ce qu鈥檕n veut continuer 脿 courir apr猫s la voiture ou est-ce qu鈥檕n se d茅cide enfin 脿 la conduire? Pour ce faire, dans les six mois qui arrivent, vous devez r茅ussir le pari de notre s茅curit茅, dont vous avez fait une priorit茅.

Le pari de notre s茅curit茅 茅conomique d鈥檃bord, face 脿 des concurrents du monde entier qui rivalisent d鈥檃ttractivit茅 et qui pi茅tinent les r猫gles commerciales.

Le pari de notre s茅curit茅 physique et militaire, pour qu鈥檈nfin nous sachions nous d茅fendre par nous-m锚mes, en Europ茅ens.

Le pari de notre s茅curit茅 茅nerg茅tique, au moment o霉 nous sortons des 茅nergies fossiles russes. Je voudrais d'ailleurs vous dire, Monsieur le Premier Ministre, que nous n鈥檃urons pas d鈥檃venir si nous mettons 脿 bas le pacte vert. Le pacte vert, c鈥檈st la cl茅 de notre ind茅pendance 茅nerg茅tique. Le pacte vert, c鈥檈st la cl茅 de notre souverainet茅. Le pacte vert, c鈥檈st la cl茅 de notre avenir, de celui de nos enfants et de leurs enfants 脿 eux. Alors, oui 脿 la simplification, 脿 la simplification r茅elle, concr猫te, qui facilite la vie de nos entreprises, pour leur permettre de gagner en comp茅titivit茅. Oui au pragmatisme, mais non 脿 la remise en cause de nos objectifs climatiques.

Le d茅fi de notre s茅curit茅 politique, enfin: celle de nos d茅mocraties, 脿 l鈥櫭╮e o霉 prosp猫re l鈥檈xtr锚me droite, 脿 l鈥櫭╮e de la d茅sinformation et des ing茅rences hybrides. Ces d茅stabilisations, nous devons y r茅pondre. Et, parmi elles, vous l鈥檃vez 茅voqu茅, il y a l鈥檌nstrumentalisation migratoire. Oui, Monsieur le Premier Ministre, nous avons entendu, et oui, face 脿 elle, face 脿 cette instrumentalisation migratoire, nous vous aiderons. Mais je tiens 脿 rappeler une chose: la priorit茅 des priorit茅s dans ce domaine, c鈥檈st la mise en 艙uvre du nouveau pacte sur la migration et l鈥檃sile, et je regrette que vous ne l鈥檃yez pas soutenu.

Alors, oui, l鈥橢urope sera 脿 vos c么t茅s, mais, si nous voulons y arriver d茅finitivement, nous devons travailler ensemble, y compris dans la mise en 艙uvre du pacte. Un seul mot: 芦efficacit茅禄, Monsieur le Premier Ministre. Liczymy na was!听

听听Terry Reintke, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group. 鈥� Madam President, dear colleagues, dear Prime Minister Tusk, welcome to the European 合法博彩网站. I think a lot of us are quite happy about this change in Council Presidency, especially because we live in times where Europe has to act.

The new US President has started the year 2025 with a series of threats against our common European interests. In the east of Europe, Putin is still waging an illegal war of his great power fantasies, only held back by the outstanding courage of the Ukrainian people. And the signs of hope 鈥� we know this, colleagues 鈥� in the Middle East are still extremely fragile.

So Europe united has to be our answer to the challenges of our time 鈥� a united European Union as a harbour of security and strength for the people in Europe. And after the disastrous Hungarian Presidency, Prime Minister Tusk, now a great responsibility lies on Poland, because we need to see action.

You have made security the key issue of your Presidency, and I can only tell you 'well done'. We also think this should be a priority. But when we, for example, talk about defence 鈥� you have spoken about it 鈥� actually you don't really need to convince this House because the European 合法博彩网站 has been at the forefront of fighting for a defence union in the past. You actually have to go to the capitals and tell them not only to use European defence in their Sunday speeches, but to actually put action into their words and to move forward on this, because we have heard enough words. We need to see action on this.

But, Mr Tusk, I also have to tell you that security also goes hand-in-hand with environmental security. Because what security is there if floods are endangering our people and are destroying our homes, droughts are killing our crops, and masses of water and wildfires ruin entire infrastructures or economies of the whole region? Protecting the climate is ultimately about protecting humans. Investing in the ecological transition on the European continent is making us more independent, protecting our energy security from the threatening powers of dictators and autocrats. Fossils mean dependency; renewables mean freedom. We have to see this also in the Polish Presidency.

Lastly, Prime Minister Tusk, it's been a while, but I think you know, not only in the streets of Poland, people were celebrating when you won the election. All across Europe, there was a sense of hope and relief that Poland, as a strong partner, is back at the European table 鈥� a strong Poland that will defend the rule of law, our democratic values and uphold human rights. You won because people wanted change. You won because people put hope in you who had been stripped of their rights, who were silenced and who were denied freedom. These people count on you, and they count on us right now.

You also managed by unifying the political forces of the centre, including the Social Democrats, the Liberals and the Greens. And for me, this leads the way in Europe. But honestly, Mr Tusk, here in this House, the only majority that can secure a strong and ready-to-act Europe 鈥� the majority of the centre 鈥� is in danger. Also by dangerous games of your own political party who have been voting with the far-right in not only one occasion in this House. So you have a responsibility here, Mr Tusk. We want to see a strong Polish Presidency, but also remind your own political group of how important it is 鈥� in this crucial moment 鈥� that we do sensible politics in the centre in Europe right now.

听听Manon Aubry, au nom du groupe The Left. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, chers coll猫gues, Monsieur le Premier Ministre Tusk, le 9听juin 2023, une femme, Dorota听Lalik, enceinte de cinq mois, est morte d鈥檜ne septic茅mie faute d鈥檃voir pu avorter. Cela s鈥檈st pass茅 dans votre pays, Monsieur听Tusk, la Pologne. Cette femme de 33听ans avait la vie devant elle. Elle est morte parce que des hommes ont d茅cr茅t茅 qu鈥檌ls savaient mieux que les femmes ce qu鈥檈lles devaient faire de leur corps. Comme Dorota, trop de femmes ont perdu leur vie en raison de l鈥檌nterdiction de l鈥橧VG en Pologne. Comment cela peut-il encore avoir lieu en Europe au XXIe听si猫cle, au moment o霉 l鈥檕n c茅l猫bre les cinquante ans de l鈥檃nniversaire de la loi Veil dans mon pays, la France?

Le droit 脿 l鈥橧VG est en danger, et la passivit茅 totale de l鈥橴nion europ茅enne encourage l鈥檌nternationale r茅actionnaire, qui s鈥檕rganise pour l鈥檃ttaquer partout en Europe, comme on l鈥檃 encore vu lors d鈥檜n rassemblement qui a eu lieu ce week-end 脿 Paris. Pourtant, Monsieur听Tusk, vous aviez 茅t茅 茅lu sur la promesse de lib茅raliser le droit 脿 l鈥檃vortement contre le PiS, qui avait mis en place cette loi ignoble. Pendant que certains groupes politiques, ici encore, croient c茅l茅brer avec votre gouvernement la victoire du monde libre, vous prolongez en r茅alit茅 certaines des politiques d鈥檈xtr锚me droite. Et c鈥檈st bien ce que l鈥檕n retrouve dans le programme de travail de votre pr茅sidence de l鈥橴nion europ茅enne. Je l鈥檃i bien lu et, franchement, je me suis demand茅 s鈥檌l n鈥檡 avait pas des pans qui avaient 茅t茅 茅crits par M.听Orb谩n ou par Mme听Meloni.

Alors que les in茅galit茅s explosent, que les catastrophes climatiques s鈥檃ccumulent, vous n鈥檃vez qu鈥檜n seul mot 脿 la bouche: la s茅curit茅. Et la s茅curit茅 de Dorota, Monsieur Tusk? Et la s茅curit茅 des femmes qui risquent leur vie pour d茅cider du droit le plus simple et inali茅nable, 脿 savoir disposer de leur propre corps?

Le pire dans tout 莽a, c鈥檈st que vous reliez ce mot, bien 茅videmment, au fantasme d鈥檌nvasion migratoire. Pas 茅tonnant, quand on sait que vous voulez suspendre le droit d鈥檃sile. Pourtant, il y avait tant 脿 faire avec cette pr茅sidence polonaise, comme par exemple avoir une minorit茅 de blocage pour s鈥檕pposer 脿 l鈥檃ccord de libre-茅change avec le Mercosur, ou encore cr茅er une v茅ritable ind茅pendance europ茅enne plut么t que s鈥檃ligner dans les pas des 脡tats-Unis de Donald Trump. 脌 moins que vous ne consid茅riez que leur projet climatosceptique, raciste et misogyne soit la voie 脿 suivre.

Monsieur听Tusk, en conclusion, on ne s鈥檕ppose pas 脿 l鈥檈xtr锚me droite en reprenant une partie de ses propositions. Pour Dorota et pour toutes les victimes des obscurantistes, nous avons au contraire le devoir de nous opposer 脿 elle frontalement, avec un projet radicalement 茅mancipateur.

听听Ewa Zaj膮czkowska-Hernik, w imieniu grupy ESN. 鈥� Panie Premierze, powiedzie膰 mo偶na o Panu bardzo wiele. Najgorsze w tym wszystkim jest to, 偶e nie mo偶na o Panu powiedzie膰 absolutnie nic dobrego. A szkoda, bo jednak rz膮dzi Pan moim krajem - niestety. Powiedzie膰, 偶e jest Pan najgorszym premierem w historii Polski, to jak nie powiedzie膰 nic. Dlaczego? Dlatego, 偶e w Polsce m贸wi Pan, 偶e pakt migracyjny powinien zosta膰 odrzucony, a Zielony 艁ad zrewidowany. Tymczasem 11 grudnia 2024 roku zatwierdza Pan w uzgodnieniach z Dani膮 i Cyprem szybkie wdro偶enie paktu migracyjnego i Zielonego 艁adu.

Jest Pan wielkim przeciwnikiem imigracji, a w 2014 i 2015 roku razem z Angel膮 Merkel zaprasza Pan imigrant贸w do Europy. Za Pana rz膮d贸w powsta艂 Nord Stream 2 i to Pan by艂 zwolennikiem resetu z Rosj膮, a teraz Pan udaje wielkiego wroga Putina. Wreszcie, gdy by艂 Pan przewodnicz膮cym Rady Europejskiej, nie zrobi艂 Pan dla Polski absolutnie nic i jedyne, co Panu wysz艂o, to Wielka Brytania z Unii Europejskiej. Tak si臋 zastanawiam, czy ma Pan chocia偶 jedn膮 swoj膮 prawdziw膮 twarz? Jest Pan politykiem-memem, z t膮 r贸偶nic膮, 偶e memy s膮 zabawne, a Pan jest niebezpieczny. Znaj膮c Pana, chcia艂abym, 偶eby po polskiej prezydencji da艂 Pan Polsce 艣wi臋ty spok贸j.

听听Dolors Montserrat (PPE). 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, se帽or presidente en ejercicio del Consejo, que usted est茅 al frente de las instituciones es una muy buena noticia, porque significa que los valores europeos vuelven a alinearse con las necesidades y el futuro de millones de ciudadanos.

Polonia y Espa帽a comparten grandes desaf铆os: m谩s defensa del Estado de Derecho 鈥攗stedes han sufrido a Gobiernos anteriores que lo han puesto en riesgo, como los espa帽oles sufrimos al Gobierno de S谩nchez, que asalta la justicia y las instituciones en Espa帽a鈥�, una inversi贸n en seguridad a la altura de los desaf铆os que afrontamos 鈥攃omo puede ser la lucha contra las mafias, que utilizan el drama humano de la migraci贸n que est谩 golpeando Canarias鈥� y m谩s apoyo firme a la libertad y a la democracia, para que ning煤n Gobierno europeo blanquee dictaduras como la de Maduro por intereses oscuros.

Ahora, con usted en el Consejo, tenemos la gran oportunidad de defender la democracia, dentro de Europa, en Venezuela y en cualquier rinc贸n del mundo.

Se帽or Tusk, el Partido Popular Europeo estar谩 a su lado para combatir la deriva autocr谩tica de algunos y reconstruir el alma de Europa. Democracia, libertad, oportunidades y seguridad.

听听Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus (S&D). 鈥� Panie Premierze! Polska prezydencja to historyczna okazja. Ameryka艅ska, ale i europejska polityka jest coraz bardziej populistyczna, prawicowa i niestety zbyt cz臋sto, powiedzmy to wprost, po prostu faszystowska. W Polsce pokonali艣my PiS dlatego, 偶e podczas czarnych czas贸w ich rz膮d贸w byli艣my konsekwentni w naszych pogl膮dach, byli艣my konsekwentni, je艣li chodzi o praworz膮dno艣膰, prawa cz艂owieka czy wizj臋 silnej i zjednoczonej Europy. Dzi艣 czarne chmury nadci膮gaj膮 nie tylko nad Stany Zjednoczone, ale i na ca艂y 艣wiat. I to jest nasza szansa. Musimy pokaza膰, 偶e Unia Europejska jest silna i gotowa postawi膰 si臋 radykalnej prawicy i populizmowi. Dok艂adnie tak samo, jak to zrobi艂a Polska rok temu. Mamy ju偶 jednego 艣wiatowego przyw贸dc臋 Donalda, kt贸ry jest populistyczny, radykalny i nieprzewidywalny. Niech ten europejski Donald b臋dzie progresywny, przewidywalny i demokratyczny i chroni warto艣ci europejskie, na kt贸rych Europa zosta艂a zbudowana.

Powiedzia艂 Pan, 偶e mamy w Europie 450 milion贸w ludzi. Po艂owa z nich to kobiety. To jest bardzo kluczowy dla nas temat, co tutaj ju偶 kilkukrotnie pad艂o z tej sali. Jako socjali艣ci i demokraci stworzyli艣my Kart臋 Praw Kobiet. To jest gotowy dokument, kt贸ry m贸g艂by stworzy膰 parasol ochronny dla wszystkich kobiet w Europie, szczeg贸lnie dla kobiet w Polsce. Nie uda艂o nam si臋 tego zrobi膰 w Polsce. Wiemy dlaczego. Zr贸bmy to w Europie, 偶eby Polki mia艂y dok艂adnie takie same prawa jak Belgijki, Francuzki czy inne Europejki, kobiety w Europie.

Ostatnia rzecz, - wiem, 偶e mottem polskiej prezydencji jest bezpiecze艅stwo, ale w tych trudnych czasach wojen i konflikt贸w nie mo偶emy zapomnie膰 o kulturze i sztuce, bo ona czyni nas naprawd臋 ludzkimi. Mam pismo od wszystkich ministr贸w kultury, kt贸rzy prosz膮 o to, aby nie rezygnowa膰 z programu Kreatywna Europa.

听听Jean-Paul Garraud (PfE). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Monsieur le Premier Ministre, en ce d茅but d鈥檃nn茅e marqu茅 par des crises internationales et des d茅fis cruciaux, la pr茅sidence polonaise du Conseil de l鈥橴nion europ茅enne rev锚t une importance certaine. Monsieur le Premier Ministre, vous dites que vous vous engagerez 脿 agir en faveur de la s茅curit茅 et de la stabilit茅 de notre continent. On ne peut que vous y encourager, avec un objectif prioritaire: la lutte contre l鈥檌mmigration de masse, qui, sinon, submergera l鈥橢urope.

Depuis des ann茅es, nous subissons une pression migratoire intol茅rable, amplifi茅e par les crises 茅conomiques, les conflits et la porosit茅 de certaines fronti猫res ext茅rieures, amplifi茅e aussi 鈥撎齟t surtout听鈥� par une politique volontairement immigrationniste de l鈥橴nion europ茅enne, illustr茅e notamment par le nouveau pacte sur la migration et l鈥檃sile. Monsieur le Premier Ministre, vous dites vouloir vous engager 脿 la construction d鈥檜n bouclier oriental qui vise 脿 prot茅ger vos 800听kilom猫tres de fronti猫re avec la Russie et la Bi茅lorussie. C鈥檈st l脿 un exemple de ce que devrait 锚tre une 猫re nouvelle pour la politique europ茅enne.

L鈥橴nion europ茅enne doit en effet prot茅ger ses fronti猫res ext茅rieures et soutenir tous les 脡tats qui agissent en ce sens. Nous devons refuser les m茅canismes impos茅s, tel le nouveau pacte sur la migration et l鈥檃sile, qui vise 脿 relocaliser dans nos campagnes les migrants sans consulter les peuples concern茅s. Ces politiques sont contraires aux int茅r锚ts nationaux et 脿 la volont茅 des peuples 鈥撎齨os peuples n鈥檈n veulent pas, il faudrait les 茅couter. Or, il est essentiel de replacer les nations au c艙ur des d茅cisions pour construire une Europe respectueuse des identit茅s et de nos souverainet茅s. Nos concitoyens europ茅ens attendent des actions claires: cesser l鈥檌mmigration incontr么l茅e, renforcer les contr么les et repenser totalement le droit d鈥檃sile.

Sur la question de la d茅fense, la Pologne montre l鈥檈xemple en mati猫re d鈥檌nvestissements strat茅giques, avec plus de 4听% de son produit int茅rieur brut qui lui sont consacr茅s. N茅anmoins, tout cela doit s鈥檃ccompagner d鈥檜ne vigilance accrue. La coop茅ration entre les nations europ茅ennes ne doit pas diluer nos souverainet茅s nationales. C鈥檈st d鈥檃illeurs en cela qu鈥檌l ne peut 锚tre question pour nous de 芦souverainet茅 europ茅enne禄 ou de 芦d茅fense europ茅enne禄. La protection de notre continent passe par une Europe des nations, qui d茅fendent leur souverainet茅, leur identit茅, et qui coop猫rent entre elles, en respectant la volont茅 des peuples qui les composent. C鈥檈st l脿 tout le sens de nos actions.

听听Micha艂 Kobosko (Renew). 鈥� Pani Przewodnicz膮ca! Panie Premierze! Witamy w Strasburgu. M贸g艂 Pan ju偶 us艂ysze膰, jak wielkie nadzieje pok艂adane s膮 w polskiej prezydencji. W zesz艂ym tygodniu us艂yszeli o tym ministrowie naszego rz膮du koalicyjnego od przedstawicieli Renew Europe w Warszawie.

Skupi臋 si臋 dzi艣 na dw贸ch kwestiach oczywistych, na bezpiecze艅stwie i na gospodarce, bo to sfery absolutnie fundamentalne, a nawet egzystencjalne dla Polski, dla Europy.

Po pierwsze, bezpiecze艅stwo 鈭� leitmotiv polskiej prezydencji. Europ臋 trzeba przygotowa膰 na najgorszy mo偶liwy obr贸t wydarze艅, zapewniaj膮c najwy偶szej jako艣ci uzbrojenie, organizacyjnie 鈭� wprowadzaj膮c najlepsze plany obrony cywilnej oraz infrastrukturalnie 鈭� zapewniaj膮c bezpiecze艅stwo infrastruktury krytycznej tak偶e przed cyberzagro偶eniami. Do tego potrzebne s膮 ogromne nak艂ady i przyj臋cie odpowiednich plan贸w, takich jak EDIP 鈥� program na rzecz europejskiego przemys艂u obronnego. Bardzo licz臋, 偶e polska prezydencja zdo艂a zbudowa膰 porozumienie w tych trudnych sprawach, bo nie mamy dzi艣 innego wyboru.

Po drugie, gospodarka. Potrzebujemy nowej polityki przemys艂owej bez kategorycznego zaprzeczenia Zielonemu 艁adowi, obrony interes贸w gospodarczych Europy, pokazania ambicji rozwojowych i jasnego przyw贸dztwa. Europejski przemys艂 stoi przed wielkimi wyzwaniami w zwi膮zku z nisk膮 konkurencyjno艣ci膮 i dominacj膮 technologiczn膮 ze strony Chin i Stan贸w Zjednoczonych. Musimy zbudowa膰 suwerenno艣膰 technologiczn膮 Europy i egzekwowa膰 prawo europejskie co do joty. Potrzeby wsparcia przemys艂u, tak偶e polskiego, s膮 ogromne, a 艣rodki w bud偶ecie europejskim niewystarczaj膮ce. Bez odpowiedzi na ameryka艅skie IRA i inne tego typu programy Polska nie zwyci臋偶y w globalnym wy艣cigu.

Panie Premierze, powodzenia. Liczymy na dobr膮 wsp贸艂prac臋.

听听Hannah Neumann (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Madam President, you put security and defence at the heart of the Polish Presidency, Prime Minister. Quite timely, I would say. I have been working on these issues for more than ten years. You even longer. And all this time, we have heard countless heads of state showing up here, speaking of European autonomy, strengthening European defence, a true European defence Union... Well, let me tell you, this House is ready. And we both know that the problem is political will in the Member States.

So I'm asking you what I have been asking all these previous heads of state. What competences are you willing to transfer from the national to the European level, so that we will finally walk tangible steps towards this end? And a little spoiler: so far the answer has always been silence. So maybe today is a good moment to change that. It's cheaper and it will make us safer.

听听Konstantinos Arvanitis (The Left). 鈥� 螝蠀蟻委伪 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 魏蠉蟻喂蔚 螤蟻蠅胃蠀蟺慰蠀蟻纬苇, 蠂伪委蟻慰渭伪喂 蔚喂位喂魏蟻喂谓维 蟺慰蠀 蔚委蟽蟿蔚 蔚未蠋 魏伪喂 胃苇位蠅 谓伪 蟺蠅 伪蟺位蠋蟼 蠈蟿喂 蠈蟿伪谓 蠂伪蠆未蔚蠉慰蠀渭蔚 蟿慰 伪蠁萎纬畏渭伪 蟿畏蟼 伪魏蟻慰未蔚尉喂维蟼, 喂蟽蠂蠀蟻慰蟺慰喂慰蠉渭蔚 蟿畏 蠁蠅谓萎 蟿畏蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏 蠁蠅谓萎 蟿畏蟼 Alt-Right, 伪魏蠈渭伪 魏伪喂 蔚未蠋 蟽蟿慰 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏蠈 螝慰喂谓慰尾慰蠉位喂慰. 螝伪喂 谓慰渭委味蠅 蠈蟿喂 蟿慰 魏伪蟿伪位维尾伪蟿蔚 蟺慰位蠉 魏伪胃伪蟻维. 围伪委蟻慰渭伪喂 蔚喂位喂魏蟻喂谓维 蟺慰蠀 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰谓 螠维喂慰 苇蠂蔚喂 位萎尉蔚喂 畏 未喂伪未喂魏伪蟽委伪 蟿慰蠀 维蟻胃蟻慰蠀 7 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 螤慰位蠅谓委伪 魏伪喂 蔚蟺喂胃蠀渭蠋 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿喂魏维 谓伪 未蠅 蟿畏谓 螤慰位蠅谓委伪 鈥斚勎肺� 伪纬伪蟺畏渭苇谓畏 螤慰位蠅谓委伪鈥� 谓伪 蟽苇尾蔚蟿伪喂 蟿慰 魏蟻维蟿慰蟼 未喂魏伪委慰蠀 魏伪喂 蟿伪 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺喂谓伪 未喂魏伪喂蠋渭伪蟿伪. 螒位位维 渭蔚 蟺蟻慰尾位畏渭伪蟿委味蔚喂 魏伪喂 渭蔚 伪谓畏蟽蠀蠂蔚委 蟽慰尾伪蟻维 蠈蟿喂, 蟺伪蟻维 蠈位伪 蟿伪 胃苇渭伪蟿伪 蟿慰蠀 蟺蟻蠈蟽蠁伪蟿慰蠀 蟺伪蟻蔚位胃蠈谓蟿慰蟼, 蟽蟿喂蟼 蟺蟻慰蟿蔚蟻伪喂蠈蟿畏蟿蔚蟼 蟿畏蟼 蔚位位畏谓喂魏萎蟼 蟺蟻慰蔚未蟻委伪蟼, 蟽蟿慰蠀蟼 蔚蟺蟿维 尾伪蟽喂魏慰蠉蟼 维尉慰谓蔚蟼, 未蔚谓 未委谓蔚蟿伪喂 蟺蟻慰蟿蔚蟻伪喂蠈蟿畏蟿伪 蟽蟿畏谓 蟺蟻蠈蟽尾伪蟽畏 蟽蟿畏 未喂魏伪喂慰蟽蠉谓畏 魏伪喂 蟽蟿伪 胃蔚渭蔚位喂蠋未畏 未喂魏伪喂蠋渭伪蟿伪. 螌蟿伪谓 蔚委蠂伪渭蔚 蔚蟺喂蟽魏蔚蠁胃蔚委 蟿畏 螔伪蟻蟽慰尾委伪 蟿慰谓 桅位蔚尾维蟻畏 蟿慰蠀 2022 渭蔚 蟿畏谓 蠀蟺慰慰渭维未伪 纬喂伪 蟿慰 魏蟻维蟿慰蟼 未喂魏伪委慰蠀, 蔚委蠂伪渭蔚 伪谓伪魏伪位蠉蠄蔚喂 蟿伪 蟺伪蟻维谓慰渭伪 位慰纬喂蟽渭喂魏维 Pegasus 魏伪喂 蟽蟿萎胃畏魏蔚 畏 蔚蟺喂蟿蟻慰蟺萎 PEGA. 螝伪喂 蟽蟿畏 蠂蠋蟻伪 渭慰蠀, 蟿畏谓 螘位位维未伪, 蔚委蠂伪渭蔚 蟺慰位蠉 蟽慰尾伪蟻维 胃苇渭伪蟿伪 渭蔚 蟿慰 胃苇渭伪 Pegasus. 螕喂伪 蟿慰 Predator 渭喂位蠋. 螝伪喂 胃伪 蟺伪蟻伪魏伪位慰蠉蟽伪 蟽蟿畏 未蔚蠀蟿蔚蟻慰位慰纬委伪 蟽伪蟼 谓伪 渭伪蟼 蔚谓畏渭蔚蟻蠋蟽蔚蟿蔚 纬喂伪 蟿喂蟼 蔚尉蔚位委尉蔚喂蟼 蟽蟿慰 胃苇渭伪 伪蠀蟿蠈. 螝伪喂 苇谓伪 蟿蔚位蔚蠀蟿伪委慰, 渭喂伪 蔚蟺委魏位畏蟽畏, 未蔚谓 谓慰蔚委蟿伪喂 伪魏蠈渭伪 蟽蟿畏谓 螤慰位蠅谓委伪 谓伪 蠀蟺维蟻蠂慰蠀谓 Free zone 纬喂伪 蟿伪 螞螣螒韦螝螜 维蟿慰渭伪.

听听Tomasz Froelich (ESN). 鈥� Pani Przewodnicz膮ca! Panie Premierze Tusk, Pan chyba lepiej rozumie po niemiecku, a wi臋c zrobi臋 Panu t臋 przyjemno艣膰.

Herr Tusk, Politiker wie Sie sind die gr枚脽te Gefahr f眉r europ盲ische Nationen. Als Sie in der Opposition waren, haben Sie mithilfe der EU die Souver盲nit盲t Ihres eigenen Landes angegriffen. Nun, wo Sie wieder regieren, zerst枚ren Sie die Rechtsstaatlichkeit in Polen. Oppositionelle werden gejagt, politisch unbequeme Gerichtsurteile werden kassiert. Ihr Medienputsch war illegal, und nun drohen Sie mit noch mehr Zensur im Internet. Das erinnert immer mehr an ein Regime.

Was Sie in einem Jahr an Br眉chen gegen die Rechtsstaatlichkeit begangen haben, hat sich die PiS in acht Jahren nicht getraut. Die EU l盲sst Ihnen all das durchgehen, schlie脽lich waren Sie immer Br眉ssels bravster Diener. Und nun drohen Sie, Ihr Werk der Zerst枚rung auf ganz Europa auszuweiten 鈥� Massenmigration, Zensur, geopolitische Eskalation, Wokeness, Green Deal. Sie sind doch ein Wegbereiter all dessen, auch wenn Sie heute davon nichts mehr wissen wollen.

Sie sind eine polnische Angela Merkel. Sie sind eine polnische Ursula von der Leyen. Und das Schlimmste ist: Sie sind auch noch stolz darauf. Das ist schlecht f眉r Ihr Land Polen, und das ist schlecht f眉r unseren Kontinent Europa.

听听Fabio De Masi (NI). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, Herr Pr盲sident Tusk! Sie haben die Priorit盲ten der polnischen Pr盲sidentschaft genannt, und die bestehen darin, die Verteidigungsausgaben zu erh枚hen und die Sanktionen zu versch盲rfen und vollst盲ndig auf russische Energieimporte zu verzichten.

Sehen wir auf die R眉stung: 500听Milliarden听Euro sind im Gespr盲ch. In meinem Heimatland, in Deutschland, konkurrieren Gr眉ne und AfD darum, wer Herrn Trump jeden Wunsch von den Lippen abliest, und es werden f眉nf, sechs Prozent des Bruttoinlandsprodukts genannt. Aber wir haben einen Riesenfilz in der R眉stung: Wir haben 89 Gro脽waffensysteme in Europa, 27 in den USA. Frau von der Leyen ist 眉berhaupt nur Kommissionspr盲sidentin geworden, weil sie f眉r den Beschaffungsfilz bei der Bundeswehr verantwortlich war. Wir haben bereits jetzt das Dreifache der R眉stungsausgaben Russlands 鈥� w盲hrend bei uns die Z眉ge nicht mehr fahren, die Kinder in den Schulen nicht mehr richtig rechnen und lesen lernen.

Und gleichzeitig wollen wir die Energiesanktionen versch盲rfen, w盲hrend Herr Trump sagt: Wenn ihr nicht von uns das schmutzige Fracking-Gas kauft, dann erh枚hen wir Strafz枚lle. Wir haben uns v枚llig nackt gemacht und sind v枚llig abh盲ngig von dem Irren im Wei脽en Haus.

Und zuletzt m枚chte ich Sie fragen, Herr Tusk, warum Sie die Terroristen, die die Nord-Stream-Sprengung verantwortet haben, einfach aus Polen haben ausreisen lassen, anstatt sie zu verhaften.

听听Fran莽ois-Xavier Bellamy (PPE). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Monsieur le Premier Ministre, il y a un mois, avec Andrzej听Halicki, nous 茅tions 脿 la fronti猫re entre la Pologne et la Bi茅lorussie. Depuis des ann茅es, la Pologne, comme d鈥檃utres pays, porte la s茅curit茅 de l鈥橢urope et la protection des fronti猫res ext茅rieures de notre continent tout entier. Et depuis des ann茅es vous avez alert茅, Monsieur le Premier ministre, sur le fait que la crise migratoire, que vous avez appel茅e une 芦guerre hybride禄, 茅tait un enjeu de s茅curit茅, un enjeu de stabilit茅, un enjeu existentiel pour nos pays.

Pendant trop longtemps, nos pays, en Europe de l鈥橭uest en particulier, ont r茅pondu 脿 cette alerte par une forme d鈥檌ndiff茅rence, par le silence, par le m茅pris ou par des le莽ons de morale. Mais, aujourd鈥檋ui, tout a chang茅, parce que notre famille politique 鈥撎齰otre famille, Monsieur le Premier Ministre听鈥� a aujourd鈥檋ui les leviers pour agir, au Conseil et, 茅videmment, au sein de ce Parlement. Et nous allons mettre fin 脿 l鈥檌mpuissance migratoire de l鈥橴nion europ茅enne.

Nous obtiendrons enfin la directive 芦retour禄, dont nous avons besoin et dont vous avez fait une priorit茅, pour que le droit europ茅en facilite l鈥檈xpulsion des migrants ill茅gaux au lieu de favoriser leur implantation. Nous avons obtenu que les fonds europ茅ens puissent enfin soutenir les pays de premi猫re entr茅e qui, comme le v么tre, investissent pour la protection de nos fronti猫res 脿 tous. C鈥檈st ce changement que les Europ茅ens attendent et c鈥檈st par ce changement que nous allons d茅montrer que la majorit茅 a chang茅 ici, dans ce Parlement.

听听Ren茅 Repasi (S&D). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen, vor allem werter Herr Ministerpr盲sident! Es ist gut, dass gerade zu einem Zeitpunkt wie diesem jemand die Ratspr盲sidentschaft 眉bernimmt, der ein 眉berzeugter Europ盲er ist听鈥� eben der andere Donald. In einer Welt, in der das Faustrecht des vermeintlich St盲rkeren eine Renaissance erlebt, in der jeder alle Freiheit f眉r sich selbst reklamiert, aber den anderen nicht zugesteht, muss das europ盲ische 鈥濭emeinsam sind wir stark!鈥� nicht nur proklamiert, sondern auch tatkr盲ftig umgesetzt werden.

Daf眉r steht das Polen unter Ihrer F眉hrung. Sie setzen den Akzent richtig auf das Thema Sicherheit. Daf眉r m眉ssen wir aber auch uns liebgewordene Selbstverst盲ndlichkeiten 眉ber Bord werfen 鈥� und das sage ich bewusst als deutscher Abgeordneter 鈥� und einander vertrauen. Gerade als Vorsitzender der deutschen Sozialdemokratie in diesem Hause reiche ich Ihnen die Hand, damit wir gemeinsam in der politischen Mitte unseren Binnenmarkt fit machen f眉r die Herausforderungen, unsere Unternehmen ert眉chtigen und unsere hohen Schutzstandards nicht auf dem Altar der populistischen Hohepriester opfern.

听听Tam谩s Deutsch (PfE). 鈥� Tisztelt Eln枚k Asszony! Ki kell mondanunk az igazs谩got: Lengyelorsz谩gban a Tusk-f茅le hatalom m贸dszeresen sz茅tveri a jog谩llamot 茅s a demokr谩ci谩t. Lengyelorsz谩gban woke-diktat煤ra van. Donald Tusk茅k woke-diktat煤r谩j谩ban politikai 眉ld枚ztet茅snek vannak kit茅ve a hatalmon l茅v艖kh枚z k茅pest m谩sk茅pp gondolkod贸k. Ny铆lt 茅s durva politikai 眉ld枚ztet茅snek.

A jelenlegi lengyel jog谩llamis谩gi v谩ls谩ghelyzettel kapcsolatos br眉sszeli reakci贸 pedig j贸l mutatja az eur贸pai uni贸s vezet艖k kett艖s m茅rc茅j茅t. Ha Magyarorsz谩gon tizedennyi t枚rt茅nne, mint ami Lengyelorsz谩gban az elm煤lt b艖 egy 茅vben megt枚rt茅nt, akkor Ursula von der Leyen m谩r b茅kefenntart贸 er艖k k眉ld茅s茅re vonatkoz贸 el艖terjeszt茅ssel 茅lne.

De most az Eur贸pai Uni贸 vezet艖i m茅gis hallgatnak, vagy egyenesen lelkesen 眉dv枚zlik a jog谩llam 茅s a demokr谩cia sz茅tver茅s茅t, a rend艖ri er艖szak alkalmaz谩s谩t. Ezt a sz茅p, 煤j liber谩lis vil谩got, a woke-diktat煤r谩t.

Sz谩mtalan lengyel hazafi megint menek眉lni k茅nyszer眉l. R谩nk, patri贸ta magyarokra minden lengyel demokrata bar谩tunk sz谩m铆that. Mindenki, aki politikai 眉ld枚ztet茅s miatt menek眉lni k茅nyszer眉l a haz谩j谩b贸l, sz谩m铆that Magyarorsz谩gra. Most is, mint ahogy ilyen helyzetekben ez kor谩bban is 铆gy volt. A lengyel politikai 眉ld枚z枚tteket be fogjuk fogadni, 茅s ha kell, politikai mened茅kjogot adunk nekik, mert tudj谩k, "lengyel, magyar k茅t j贸 bar谩t, egy眉tt harcol, s issza bor谩t".

听听Sophie Wilm猫s (Renew). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Monsieur le Premier Ministre, il y a beaucoup de sujets que j鈥檃urais voulu aborder avec vous, mais je me concentrerai sur un seul sujet, puisque je n鈥檃i qu鈥檜ne minute.

Vous proposez dans votre programme une Europe qui prot猫ge. Cette Europe qui prot猫ge, elle doit aussi le faire en ce qui concerne le respect de ses valeurs fondamentales, comme l鈥櫭﹖at de droit. La Pologne a prouv茅, apr猫s sept ans de la proc茅dure pr茅vue 脿 l鈥檃rticle听7 du trait茅 sur l鈥橴nion europ茅enne (trait茅听UE), que, si volont茅 politique il y a, un autre chemin est possible, qui rapproche des valeurs qui sont au c艙ur de notre projet europ茅en.

Ce parcours vous donne, je pense, la l茅gitimit茅 et l鈥檈xemplarit茅 pour 锚tre le moteur n茅cessaire 脿 une r茅vision des proc茅dures prevues 脿 l鈥檃rticle听7 afin que celles-ci soient acc茅l茅r茅es, plus efficaces et plus concr猫tes. Car comment expliquer que, sept ans apr猫s, la demande du Parlement d鈥檃ctiver l鈥檃rticle听7, paragraphe听1, du trait茅听UE pour la Hongrie n鈥檃it re莽u aucune suite formelle?

J鈥檃imerais que le bilan de votre pr茅sidence soit marqu茅 d鈥檜n signal clair en mati猫re de respect de l鈥櫭﹖at de droit. C鈥檈st possible. On compte sur vous.

听听Irene Montero (The Left). 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, se帽or primer ministro Tusk, yo quiero preguntarle para qui茅n es la seguridad de la que usted habla. 驴Es seguridad para las mujeres? No: ustedes, tras m谩s de un a帽o de Gobierno, a煤n no han garantizado el derecho al aborto seguro. 驴Es seguridad para las personas que migran? No: para ellas, militarizaci贸n de fronteras y graves violaciones de derechos humanos. 驴Es seguridad para las personas LGTBI? Tampoco. 驴Es seguridad para las trabajadoras y los trabajadores? No: no pueden pagar el alquiler, no pueden tener un salario digno, no pueden llenar la cesta de la compra.

Ustedes hablan de la seguridad para no llamar a las cosas por su nombre: guerra y militarizaci贸n. Y es que usted hace lo que le exige la OTAN, que es que Europa debe sacar el dinero de las pensiones y de la sanidad para pagar las guerras de los Estados Unidos.

Se帽or Tusk, lo que Europa necesita y lo que le da seguridad es la paz, la democracia y m谩s derechos. Con la guerra, con la austeridad y con su complicidad con los genocidas, ustedes est谩n haciendo a Europa cada vez m谩s d茅bil. A qui茅n har谩n m谩s fuerte es a los Estados Unidos y a la extrema derecha. Ustedes se colocan del lado de la barbarie y a Europa la hunden en un callej贸n sin salida.

听听Marcin Sypniewski (ESN). 鈥� Pani Przewodnicz膮ca! Panie Premierze! Pana obecno艣膰 w polskiej polityce to prawdziwe fatum. Niespe艂nione obietnice, schadzki z Putinem na molo, afera pods艂uchowa, afera Amber Gold, afera hazardowa, afera reprywatyzacyjna... I m贸g艂bym tak wymienia膰 w niesko艅czono艣膰. Dzi臋ki k艂amstwom i pomocy Brukseli Pan wr贸ci艂 do w艂adzy. Przede wszystkim dzi臋ki pomocy Ursuli von der Leyen. I teraz od 400 dni nie spe艂niacie obietnic danych Polkom i Polakom. 艢miejecie si臋 nam w twarz, ale nar贸d polski wam tego nie zapomni. Polska i Europa zas艂uguj膮 na Donalda, ale nie tego, kt贸ry tutaj siedzi.

Jest dobry program, kt贸ry m贸g艂by Pan zaproponowa膰: koniec z paktem imigracyjnym, koniec z zielonym 艂adem, powr贸t do w臋gla, przyznanie, 偶e s膮 tylko dwie p艂cie, i koniec cenzury. Ale nie jest pan Donaldem Trumpem, tylko Donaldem Tuskiem. Niestety 鈥� dla nas. I dlatego Ameryk臋 czeka z艂oty wiek, a u nas dalej b臋dzie jak w lesie. Ale nie trac臋 nadziei. Wierz臋, 偶e pod koniec tej prezydencji Pana marionetka przegra wybory prezydenckie i stracicie w艂adz臋. I b臋dzie Pan musia艂 ogl膮da膰 inauguracj臋 S艂awomira Mentzena. Uczynimy Polsk臋 i Europ臋 znowu wielk膮, ale ju偶 bez Pana i bez tej zdradzieckiej, nieludzkiej...

(Przewodnicz膮ca odebra艂a m贸wcy g艂os)

听听Siegfried Mure艧an (PPE). 鈥� Madam President, I welcome Prime Minister Tusk back to the European 合法博彩网站. It is our common task to provide certainty to the people of Europe. It is our first and common obligation to provide safety, security and prosperity to the people of Europe. This is what they expect from us.

My main message to you today is that security and prosperity in Europe are connected. These have to be our priorities and we have to work on it together. We can only prosper if we are safe. We can only be safe and secure in Europe if our economy is strong, and if we are safe, we can generate investments, we can generate jobs, we can transition to the digital economy, we can protect the environment, farmers, industries, and we will have security. Without safety, we have none of these.

This is why safety and security have to be one of the top priorities of the Union. As someone responsible for the budget of the European Union, I say they should be a priority for our budget in the future.

My second point is the following: autocrats around Europe want to weaken Europe, they want us to believe ourselves as weak. We are not. We shall not believe what autocrats want us to believe about Europe. We should have our own beliefs, and we should tell the people of Europe that autocracy means hate, division, poverty and Europe means democracy, freedom, prosperity.

听听Nicola Zingaretti (S&D). 鈥� Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, Presidente Tusk, se vogliamo difendere il nostro progetto europeo, dobbiamo rinnovare il nostro modello di sviluppo e con coraggio rilanciare il processo di integrazione federale e costruire percorsi nuovi e forti verso l'Europa politica.

L'unit脿 raggiunta ha garantito, s矛, pace, prosperit脿 e libert脿, ma non garantisce pi霉 un protagonismo reale. Nuovi poteri globali e oligarchie minano le fondamenta delle democrazie occidentali.听Da sola, nessuna democrazia europea ce la far脿 鈥� 猫 vero 鈥� ma allora servono investimenti comuni, recuperare il divario di innovazione per il nostro sistema produttivo e individuare nuove politiche a tutela dei cittadini per la loro sicurezza, che 猫 la casa, la sanit脿 e la lotta alle disuguaglianze.

Investiamo, s矛, per la difesa comune, ma con acquisti comuni, progetti come quello votato dal Parlamento sull'Unione della difesa, e razionalizziamo la spesa per rafforzare insieme il pilastro europeo della NATO.

Come diceva Romano Prodi: "L'Europa 猫 una bicicletta: se si ferma, cade".

Non serve, Presidente, l'Europa minima necessaria, serve l'Europa massima possibile.

听听Tomas Tob茅 (PPE). 鈥� Madam President, Commissioner, Prime Minister Tusk, thank you for bringing Poland back to Europe. At this crucial time we welcome your strong leadership and your Presidency of the Council.

The EPP, and also my home country, Sweden, fully supports your priority to make Europe more safe and secure, to strengthen our defence and support Ukraine. And you are right that we need to take back control of our borders, and on migration.

Europe is strong, but we need to get to work to make Europe more competitive, now and for future generations. Prime Minister, you can count on MPs' support to deliver on this.

听听Javier Moreno S谩nchez (S&D). 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, se帽or primer ministro, bienvenido en su vuelta a esta casa, le deseo 茅xitos progresistas en su Presidencia.

Se帽or铆as, la Uni贸n tiene que situarse, m谩s que nunca, en el mapa mundial no solo como una potencia econ贸mica, sino tambi茅n como un actor pol铆tico que defiende la democracia, el respeto a los derechos humanos y la legalidad internacional, frente al modelo que propugna la internacional ultraderechista.

El contexto geopol铆tico mundial 鈥攁煤n m谩s convulso con el nuevo inquilino de la Casa Blanca鈥� pone a la Uni贸n Europea ante una prueba existencial. Desde la unidad, tenemos que ser el contrapeso a la mezcla explosiva de nacionalismo, expansionismo, desregulaci贸n, proteccionismo y guerras comerciales. Tenemos que seguir fortaleciendo nuestra uni贸n, garantizar su propia defensa, implementar ya, se帽or Tusk, el Pacto Verde Europeo, porque el planeta no puede esperar, pero tambi茅n implementar el pacto migratorio y proteger a los ciudadanos y la democracia. Y, sobre todo, debemos desarrollar la dimensi贸n social, dando respuesta al problema de la vivienda, especialmente para los j贸venes.

Se帽or Tusk, contamos con un europe铆sta como usted para superar esta prueba existencial de la Uni贸n Europea.

听听Andrzej Halicki (PPE). 鈥� Pani Przewodnicz膮ca! Tak wa偶ny moment, tak wa偶na debata, a tu tyle krzyk贸w, k艂amstw, atak贸w i obra偶ania. Ale musicie ich zrozumie膰. Oni si臋 boj膮 odpowiedzialno艣ci, bo kto krad艂, b臋dzie ukarany. Oni si臋 te偶 czuj膮 silni, bo maj膮 wsparcie milionera. My艣l膮, 偶e to co艣 da. Nie, to my jeste艣my patriotami, a oni s膮 blisko zdrady narodowej. Bo to my chcemy Europy silnej, takiej, jakiej oczekuj膮 obywatele europejscy. A oni chc膮 rozbitej i s艂abej. Dlatego wygramy i zwyci臋偶ymy. Tylko musimy by膰 razem. Naprawd臋 nie ma czasu na czcze gadanie.

Chcecie zmieni膰 deregulacj臋 na simplification? Prosz臋 bardzo, ale dzia艂ajmy i r贸bmy to ju偶 teraz, bo Europa musi by膰 bezpieczna w wielu wymiarach. Ochrona granic jest priorytetem. Bezpiecze艅stwo fizyczne te偶. Bezpiecze艅stwo zdrowotne, 偶ywno艣ciowe, gospodarcze, ekonomiczne 鈥� to jest nasza odpowiedzialno艣膰. I nie ma ju偶 czasu. Musimy dzia艂a膰, bo Europa musi poczu膰 nasze skuteczne dzia艂anie. Dzia艂amy dla ludzi. Jeste艣my razem. Europa zwyci臋偶y i b臋dzie bezpieczna, bo b臋dziemy razem.

Catch-the-eye procedure

听听P茅ter Magyar (PPE). 鈥� Tisztelt Eln枚k Asszony! "Polak, W臋gier, dwa bratanki." Lengyel, magyar k茅t j贸bar谩t. Tisztelt Minisztereln枚k 脷r! Engedje meg, hogy ezekben a neh茅z id艖kben, a lengyel eln枚ks茅g kezdet茅n megeml茅kezzek egy eg茅szen k眉l枚nleges dologr贸l, az ezer茅ves lengyel-magyar bar谩ts谩gr贸l. K枚z枚s kir谩lyok, kir谩lyn艖k, szentek, szabads谩gharcosok 茅s h艖s枚k. 1335-ben a lengyel, a cseh 茅s a magyar kir谩ly lerakt谩k a k枚z茅p-eur贸pai egy眉ttm疟k枚d茅s alapk枚veit. Ebb艖l alakult a V4 茅s a visegr谩di egy眉ttm疟k枚d茅s.

A magyar n茅p sosem felejti el azt az 枚nzetlen seg铆ts茅get, amit a lengyel n茅pt艖l kapott a legnehezebb id艖kben. Sosem felejtj眉k el a 48-as h艖seinket, Bem t谩bornokot, Dembinszkyt 茅s Viszockijt, ahogy az 56-ban ny煤jtott t谩mogat谩sukat sem. 脡s biztos vagyok benne, hogy a lengyel n茅p sem felejti el az 1830-as lengyel felkel茅s 茅s az 1919-21-es Szovjetuni贸 elleni h谩bor煤 idej茅n ny煤jtott magyar seg铆ts茅get. A csod谩t, amit ott 枚n枚k meg茅ltek, mikor Eur贸pa mag谩ra hagyta Lengyelorsz谩got.

Minisztereln枚k 煤r! A magyar emberek t枚bbs茅ge szomor煤an figyeli, hogy a magyar-lengyel kapcsolatokat fel谩ldozza Orb谩n Viktor a napi politikai 茅rdekeinek olt谩r谩n. Ha a k枚vetkez艖 magyar korm谩nyp谩rton, a Tisz谩n 茅s a magyar emberek t枚bbs茅g茅n m煤lik, akkor legk茅s艖bb j枚v艖re 煤jra f茅nyesen fog ragyogni a magyar-lengyel bar谩ts谩g csillaga Eur贸pa eg茅n! Nem f茅l眉nk! Dzi臋kuj臋 bardzo.

听听Victor Negrescu (S&D). 鈥� Doamn膬 pre葯edint膬, domnule prim-ministru Tusk, dragi colegi, urm膬toarele 葯ase luni sunt cruciale pentru viitorul Europei. Pre葯edin葲ia Poloniei la Consiliul Uniunii Europene trebuie s膬 g膬seasc膬 solu葲ii ambi葲ioase la problemele cu care ne confrunt膬m. Spre exemplu, definirea noilor rela葲ii cu Statele Unite sub era Trump. Ne trebuie un nou acord comercial echitabil, dar 葯i consolidarea parteneriatului de securitate pentru a proteja interesele statelor noastre: protejarea democra葲iilor europene 鈥� trebuie s膬 combatem eficient ingerin葲ele str膬ine, dezinformarea 葯i radicalizarea politic膬, 卯n mod deosebit 卯n Rom芒nia 葯i Germania, unde urmeaz膬 alegeri importante; nevoia unui buget european mai mare; protejarea politicii de coeziune 葯i a Politicii agricole comune.

De asemenea, trebuie s膬 avem finan葲膬ri suplimentare pentru s膬n膬tate 葯i educa葲ie. Bun膬starea europenilor trebuie s膬 fie pe primul loc; situa葲ia din Ucraina 葯i Republica Moldova 葯i cum putem s膬 fim la masa negocierilor noi, Europa, 葯i implica葲i 卯n procesul de reconstruc葲ie a Ucrainei. Securitatea noastr膬 a葲i evocat-o 葯i trebuie s膬 dezvolt膬m industria european膬 葯i s膬 ne respect膬m angajamentele NATO. Dac膬 vom e葯ua, proiectul european va fi 卯n pericol 葯i atunci cu to葲ii vom fi 卯n pericol.

听听Tobiasz Boche艅ski (ECR). 鈥� Pani Przewodnicz膮ca! Panie Premierze, c贸偶 za wyst膮pienie! Ani jednego konkretu. Ka偶dego dnia Europejczykom 偶yje si臋 coraz gorzej, a Pan przyje偶d偶a do Strasburga i nie jest w stanie poda膰 ani jednego konkretu, ani jednej strategii, ani jednej wizji. Pan opowiada o duchu Europy. Pan jest kaznodziej膮, bo Monteskiuszem Pan na pewno nie jest. Nie ma idea艂贸w. Nie ma wizji. Nie ma strategii. Donald Tusk w pe艂nej krasie.

You were right when you wrote 'one Donald is more than enough'. Go away, Mr Tusk!

听听Helmut Brandst盲tter (Renew). 鈥� Madam President, I would like to thank the Prime Minister for for talking about security. I'm from Austria 鈥� a neutral country 鈥� and for us, it's also very important.

I have to inform you that we have a right-wing party, FP脰, pro-Putin, and they are against Sky Shield now. All the other parties are in favour of Sky Shield because security is so important for us. But now, your friends in the 脰sterreichische Volkspartei 鈥� in the People's Party 鈥� they also against Sky Shield now.

So I really ask probably you can talk to them, talk about security, talk about how important this is for us, because we all know that we are in danger from Putin's rockets, and we want to live in peace and security together in our common Europe.

听听Jo茫o Oliveira (The Left). 鈥� Senhora Presidente, o lema da Presid锚ncia polaca 茅 芦Seguran莽a, Europa!禄. Esta proclama莽茫o esconde um apelo ao militarismo e 脿 guerra e uma pol铆tica de privil茅gios para os grandes interesses econ贸micos e financeiros, e de desprezo pelos problemas econ贸micos e sociais que atingem os povos.

No programa desta Presid锚ncia polaca n茫o h谩 refer锚ncia aos trabalhadores e aos seus direitos, e 茅 preciso uma lupa para encontrar alguma refer锚ncia a quest玫es sociais que s茫o, hoje, decisivas na vida dos povos.

A habita莽茫o 茅 uma triste caricatura disso mesmo. H谩 milh玫es de pessoas que n茫o conseguem encontrar uma casa que possam pagar, mas, no programa da Presid锚ncia polaca, o problema da habita莽茫o 茅 referido apenas como um problema estat铆stico.

Em contraste com esse desprezo pelos problemas dos povos, a Presid锚ncia polaca insiste no fornecimento de armas e equipamentos militares para prolongar a guerra na Ucr芒nia, no aumento dos gastos militares no espa莽o da UE, na corrida aos armamentos e na pol铆tica de san莽玫es, cujas consequ锚ncias continuam a pesar nas condi莽玫es de vida dos povos.

Este n茫o 茅 o caminho que sirva os povos do espa莽o da Uni茫o Europeia.

(End of catch-the-eye procedure)

听听Dubravka 艩uica, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, Prime Minister. Honourable Members, I sincerely thank you for this debate and your contributions to the challenges we are facing with regard to the crucial security items. They have been neatly addressed by the Polish Presidency. To a very large degree, we see a sense of shared purpose and a joint determination in this House to tackle the priorities of the Polish Presidency, and to do this in a spirit of joint ownership and close collaboration between our three institutions.

Those security topics are indeed challenges, but they are also opportunities. Let us think of three mutual gains that we can achieve. First, the European Union has to and will become more resilient towards malign security threats. Second, we can become more self-sustaining in the production of vital resources and commodities that we would otherwise have to import. Third, we will be able to become stronger together with other international partners or players. If we work hard and with a sense of unity, we will be able to preserve key elements of the European way. As the Commission, we are glad to be in tune with the priorities of the Polish Presidency, and we are equally glad to count on the joint determination of this House and the Council Presidency to constructively work on timely agreements and on current and upcoming legislative files in this area. It is a crucial and rewarding approach to think in a whole-of-society security dimension. It is in this spirit that the Commission is looking forward to closely working with you on the implementation of the priorities of the Polish Presidency.

听听Donald Tusk, Urz臋duj膮cy Przewodnicz膮cy Rady. 鈥� Jeszcze raz bardzo dzi臋kuj臋 za bardzo interesuj膮ce wypowiedzi, bardzo tw贸rcz膮 debat臋. Nie by艂o de facto pyta艅. Przedstawili艣cie Pa艅stwo swoje stanowisko. Chc臋 powiedzie膰, 偶e po pierwsze wiele z tych wypowiedzi utwierdzi艂o mnie w przekonaniu, jak wa偶n膮 misj膮, nieustaj膮c膮 misj膮 鈭� nie tylko dla polskiej prezydencji w Unii Europejskiej, ale tak偶e dla tych wszystkich, dla kt贸rych Europa, demokracja i wolno艣膰 naprawd臋 co艣 znacz膮 鈭� jest nieustanna, sta艂a walka o te warto艣ci. Kto艣 m贸g艂by pomy艣le膰, 偶e czu艂em si臋 jako polski premier lekko zawstydzony niekt贸rymi wypowiedziami przedstawicieli skrajnej prawicy z mojego kraju. Od艂贸偶my na bok takie uczucia jak wstyd. Ostatnie lata i ostatnie miesi膮ce pokaza艂y, 偶e polityka bywa coraz cz臋艣ciej bezwstydna.

Natomiast ja tak naprawd臋 jestem wdzi臋czny tym wszystkim, kt贸rzy tutaj weszli na m贸wnic臋 i zgodnie ze swoim zwyczajem obrazili przedm贸wc臋 w spos贸b bardzo arogancki i taki rzeczywi艣cie lekko deprymuj膮cy ludzi przyzwyczajonych do kulturalnej debaty. Ale ja jestem wdzi臋czny z jednego powodu, po raz kolejny zar贸wno ci, co ogl膮daj膮 t臋 debat臋, jak i Parlament Europejski, mogli us艂ysze膰 i zobaczy膰, dlaczego z tak膮 determinacj膮 walczy艂em wsp贸lnie z innymi demokratami w Polsce, 偶eby tych ludzi odsun膮膰 od w艂adzy. Bo ten spos贸b my艣lenia jest zagro偶eniem dla demokracji, dla jedno艣ci Europy, dla tych wszystkich warto艣ci, o kt贸re przez d艂ugie lata walczyli艣my. Dzi臋kuj臋, dla wszystkich staje si臋 znowu jasne, dlaczego jest tak wa偶ne, aby艣cie ju偶 wi臋cej nie rz膮dzili w 偶adnym z europejskich kraj贸w. Przecie偶 nie tylko w Polsce, w moim kraju, ale tak偶e ju偶 w ca艂ej Europie dobrze wiemy, komu i dlaczego zale偶y na tym, 偶eby w ka偶dym mo偶liwym przypadku atakowa膰 fundamenty Unii Europejskiej. Wiecie, dlaczego tych ludzi ogarnia dzisiaj taka furia? Bo zrozumieli, 偶e znowu si艂a jest po stronie demokrat贸w, 偶e znowu si艂a jest po stronie wolno艣ci, 偶e znowu si艂a jest po stronie rz膮d贸w prawa, 偶e znowu Europa staje si臋 silna. To doprowadza ich do furii, bo dobrze wiedz膮, 偶e to mo偶e by膰 ostateczne przekre艣lenie ich marze艅 o powrocie do w艂adzy.

I to, co jest chyba wa偶ne dla nas wszystkich, b贸j w Europie, ale te偶 na granicach europejskich, idzie w艂a艣nie o te fundamenty. To nie jest dzisiaj dyskusja o to, kt贸ra partia wygra, jakie wybory. To nawet nie jest dyskusja o tym, jaki kandydat na prezydenta, to s膮 wybory, kt贸re czekaj膮 m贸j kraj, wygra wybory prezydenckie. To jest tak naprawd臋 codzienny b贸j o wszystko. To jest tak naprawd臋 b贸j o to, co naj艣wi臋tsze dla ka偶dej Europejki i dla ka偶dego Europejczyka. Tutaj nie po raz pierwszy, ale to zobaczy艂em po raz pierwszy tak spektakularnie, tak na w艂asne oczy, ten niezwykle intensywny, taki serdeczny, pe艂en empatii sojusz mi臋dzy AFD, polsk膮 skrajn膮 prawic膮, wspierany tak serdecznie i z takim przekonaniem przez Moskw臋. To wszystko przecie偶 czyni ten konflikt, fundamentalny konflikt, niezwykle jasnym i klarownym. Ka偶dy, kto kocha Europ臋, ka偶dy, kto kocha wolno艣膰, ka偶dy, kto kocha demokracj臋, musi do tej konfrontacji stan膮膰 z otwart膮 przy艂bic膮, z podniesionym czo艂em, z pewno艣ci膮, z tak膮 pe艂n膮 艣wiadomo艣ci膮, o jak wielk膮 stawk臋 idzie ta walka. Tu chodzi naprawd臋 o przysz艂o艣膰 Europy. I za to, 偶e uczynili艣cie to znowu tak jasnym, bardzo dzi臋kuj臋.

Chc臋 jeszcze jedno zdanie powiedzie膰, je艣li pozwolicie, bo w tym moim i tak do艣膰 d艂ugim wst臋pie nie m贸wi艂em o rozszerzeniu. Jak wiecie, to jest tak偶e jeden z tych konkret贸w, o kt贸rych m贸wimy w programie polskiej prezydencji. I rozszerzenie, a w艂a艣ciwie to, z czym mamy do czynienia od wielu lat, czyli to pragnienie wielu pa艅stw i narod贸w o tym, aby sta膰 si臋 cz艂onkiem naszej wsp贸lnoty, pokazuje, jak Europa jest wa偶na, atrakcyjna, jak jest silna. Nikt nie chce sta膰 si臋 cz臋艣ci膮 s艂abej wsp贸lnoty. S艂uchajcie, czasami jest tak, 偶e Ukrai艅cy, Bia艂orusini, kt贸rzy si臋 nie poddali, mieszka艅cy Ba艂kan贸w Zachodnich, Mo艂dowy, 偶e oni czasami bardziej wierz膮 ni偶 my w si艂臋 i przysz艂o艣膰 Europy. Ba, niekt贸rzy z nich daj膮 艣wiadectwo krwi. Przecie偶 ta wielka wojna, jaka toczy si臋 za naszymi granicami, to jest wojna o to, co jest istot膮 Europy. Tak naprawd臋 ta wojna zacz臋艂a si臋 od pierw wypowiedzianego, a p贸藕niej realizowanego marzenia Ukrainy o byciu cz艂onkiem tej naszej europejskiej wsp贸lnoty. Wiecie co jest fenomenem te偶? B膮d藕cie z tego dumni.

Zobaczcie ile pot臋偶nych pa艅stw na 艣wiecie czasami daje do zrozumienia, 偶e ch臋tnie by co艣 zagarn臋li. Pojawiaj膮 si臋 w debacie, tej globalnej, pytania o zachowanie porz膮dku mi臋dzynarodowego. Pytania o ryzyka agresji. Europa, Unia Europejska jest jedyn膮 pot臋g膮, a tak, uwierzcie, jeste艣my pot臋g膮, jest jedyn膮 pot臋g膮, do kt贸rej stoi kolejka pa艅stw chc膮cych sta膰 si臋 cz臋艣ci膮 tej wsp贸lnoty. Unia Europejska nikomu nie zagra偶a. W Unii Europejskiej nikt powa偶ny nie b臋dzie m贸wi艂, 偶e chcia艂by zagarn膮膰 takie czy inne terytorium. Nie, bo mamy zupe艂nie inny dylemat do rozwi膮zania. Jak szybko, bezpiecznie, tak偶e bezpiecznie dla naszych interes贸w, bo mo偶emy by膰 w tym te偶 asertywni i bardzo twardzi w tych negocjacjach rozszerzeniowych. Ale to mo偶e by膰 i b臋dzie 藕r贸d艂em naszej si艂y. Europa, Unia Europejska mo偶e by膰 coraz wi臋ksza nie dlatego, 偶e kogo艣 do tego przymusi. Dlatego, 偶e jest najlepszym miejscem na Ziemi i dlatego, 偶e inni to widz膮, nawet je艣li nie wszyscy tutaj to widz膮. Nawet je艣li niekt贸rzy marz膮 o tym, a nawet nie ukrywaj膮 tego, 偶eby rozwali膰, rozbi膰 Uni臋 Europejsk膮. Ci, kt贸rzy maj膮 oczy szeroko otwarte na 艣wiecie, wiedz膮, 偶e jeste艣my najcenniejszym mo偶liwym sojusznikiem, 偶e jeste艣my przysz艂o艣ci膮 艣wiata. Ja w to g艂臋boko wierz臋, a jestem gotowy do twardej argumentacji. A jak trzeba, i dobrze o tym wiecie, do twardej walki o to, 偶eby ta przysz艂o艣膰 europejska, te偶 przysz艂o艣膰 mojego narodu, by艂a zwi膮zana z tymi najbardziej fundamentalnymi warto艣ciami.

Europa b臋dzie wolna, nasze narody b臋d膮 wolne. B臋dziemy silni. Jest tylko jeden warunek do spe艂nienia. To my musimy pokaza膰 si艂臋, determinacj臋, odwag臋. Miejcie t臋 odwag臋, miejcie t臋 odwag臋, bo dzisiaj zobaczyli艣cie po raz kolejny, 偶e racja i tak偶e si艂a s膮 po Waszej stronie. 呕ycz臋 Wam powodzenia.

(Owacja Zgromadzenia na stoj膮co)

听听President. 鈥� The debate is closed.

Written Statements (Rule 178)

听听Maria Grapini (S&D), 卯n scris. 鈥� Domnule Prim Ministru Donald Tusk,

Am ascultat discursul dumneavoastr膬 葯i am r膬mas surprins膬 s膬 aud c膬 nu v-a葲i asumat nimic din ce a葲i f膬cut gre葯it ca pre葯edinte al Consiliului European.

Solicita葲i modificarea Pactului Verde, dar a葲i fost co-legiuitor. Apoi a葲i spus c膬 鈥瀋et膬葲enii au nevoie de bun sim葲鈥�!

Nu, domnule Tusk, cet膬葲enii au nevoie de siguran葲a traiului de zi cu zi, milioane de cet膬葲eni 葯i copii au nevoie s膬 ias膬 din s膬r膬cie.

Securitatea despre care a葲i vorbit ca prioritate pentru pre葯edin葲ia polonez膬 nu 卯nseamn膬 doar o armat膬 mai puternic膬, ci 葯i o economie mai puternic膬 卯n UE, o protec葲ie mai mare a produc膬torilor 葯i fermierilor europeni, care s膬 asigure locuri de munc膬 bine pl膬tite.

Polonia a avut un Comisar pentru Agricultur膬 葯i timp de 5 ani nu a reu葯it s膬 aduc膬 echitate 卯n subven葲iile pentru fermieri, de葯i am cerut acest lucru de mai multe ori.

脦n concluzie, a葯tept, domnule Tusk, m膬suri concrete care s膬 aduc膬 cet膬葲enilor europeni o via葲膬 mai bun膬.

听听Piotr M眉ller (ECR), na pi艣mie. 鈥� "Europa potrzebuje konkret贸w, a nie pustych s艂贸w 鈥� czas na odwa偶ne decyzje! Niespe艂nione obietnice to znak rozpoznawczy Donalda Tuska 鈥� czy Europa ma pod膮偶a膰 t膮 drog膮?

Rz膮dy Donalda Tuska w Polsce s膮 symbolem braku konkret贸w i niespe艂nionych deklaracji. Teraz te same b艂臋dy widzimy w jego podej艣ciu do zapowiedzi polskiej prezydencji w Radzie UE. Europa zas艂uguje na lider贸w, kt贸rzy dzia艂aj膮 z wizj膮 i odwag膮, a nie ograniczaj膮 si臋 do retoryki bez pokrycia. Zielony 艁ad i ETS to听hamulec dla europejskiej gospodarki. Obecna polityka klimatyczna, w tym Zielony 艁ad i system ETS, ogranicza rozw贸j gospodarczy i os艂abia konkurencyjno艣膰 Europy na arenie mi臋dzynarodowej. Aby Polska i Unia Europejska mog艂y rywalizowa膰 globalnie, konieczne jest odej艣cie od tych regulacji. Potrzebujemy rozwi膮za艅, kt贸re b臋d膮 wspiera膰 nasze przemys艂y, zamiast je dusi膰. Ochrona granic, to nie puste has艂a 鈥� m贸wimy stanowcze NIE dla paktu migracyjnego. Wzmacnianie granic UE i pomoc rozwojowa to jedyna skuteczna strategia migracyjna.

Europa zas艂uguje na wi臋cej ni偶 puste deklaracje. Rz膮dy Donalda Tuska ju偶 wstrzyma艂y rozw贸j Polski. Teraz jego nieudolna wizja zagra偶a przysz艂o艣ci ca艂ej Unii Europejskiej. Tylko odwa偶ne decyzje, kt贸re postawi膮 na gospodark臋, bezpiecze艅stwo i interesy Europejczyk贸w, pozwol膮 kontynentowi i Polsce na dynamiczny rozw贸j. Czas dzia艂a膰, zamiast m贸wi膰!"

听听J眉ri Ratas (PPE), kirjalikult. 鈥� Eesistumise moto 鈥濲ulgeolek, Euroopa!鈥� on selge s玫num praegusel ebakindlal ja keerulisel ajal, mil Euroopat m玫jutavad s玫da Ukrainas, r盲ndesurve ja majanduslikud katsumused.

Donald Tusk t玫i esile, et 鈥濫uroopa on olemas nii kaua, kui me elame鈥� 鈥� see Poola h眉mni fraas peegeldab h盲sti, kui oluline on hoida 眉hte. Peame tugevdama oma julgeolekut koost枚枚s USA, Kanada ja NATOga. Ja kui praegusel hetkel Ameerika 脺hendriikide president Donald Trump 眉tleb, et eurooplastel on vaja v玫tta suurem vastutus julgeoleku osas, siis peaksime n盲gema seda kui positiivset v盲ljakutset. Ainult liitlased saavad seada v盲ljakutseid teistele liitlastele. Ning Euroopa Liidu liikmesriigid peaksid olema k玫ige v盲盲rtuslikumad liitlased Washingtoni jaoks.

Palju on r盲盲gitud sisejulgeoleku kaitsekulutuste puhul 5%-st, kuid kandev m玫te peaks olema, et me ei tohi julgeolekus kokku hoida. Kui me ei taha tulevikus veelgi rohkem kulutada, siis tuleb 5% samm 盲ra teha n眉眉d.

Euroopa Liit ei saa olla konkurentsiv玫imeline, kui me ei m玫tle majandusele. Vajadusel tuleb muuta ka rohep枚枚rdega seotud s盲tteid, et leida tasakaal keskkonnahoiu ja konkurentsiv玫ime vahel. Samuti peame m玫tlema energiahindadele. Meie p玫llumehed vajavad v盲hem b眉rokraatiat, sest toiduainetega varustuskindlust on v盲ga oluline hoida.

Meie tulevik on meie k盲tes ja me suudame kujundada oma saatust. Peame j盲盲ma loovaks, julgeks ja 眉htseks. Praegu on t盲htis hetk, kus me ei tohi aega kaotada.

听听Zolt谩n Tarr (PPE), 铆谤谩蝉产补苍. 鈥� A mai plen谩ris 眉l茅sen bemutatott lengyel soros eln枚ks茅gi program fontos priorit谩sokat t疟z枚tt ki, amelyek teljes m茅rt茅kben egybeesnek Magyarorsz谩g 茅rdekeivel: hat谩rv茅delem, a gazdas谩g er艖s铆t茅se 茅s az agr谩rium fejleszt茅se. A TISZA nev茅ben szeretn茅m hangs煤lyozni e c茅lok jelent艖s茅g茅t 茅s a benn眉k rejl艖 k枚z枚s lehet艖s茅geket.

A lengyel eln枚ks茅g hat谩rozott ki谩ll谩sa az uni贸s hat谩rok v茅delme mellett elengedhetetlen nemcsak Lengyelorsz谩g, hanem Magyarorsz谩g sz谩m谩ra is. Egy er艖s 茅s hat茅kony hat谩rv茅delmi rendszer alapvet艖 felt茅tele 谩llampolg谩raink biztons谩g谩nak 茅s az EU k眉ls艖 hat谩rainak meg贸v谩s谩nak.

Hasonl贸k茅ppen kiemelked艖en fontos a gazdas谩g er艖s铆t茅s茅re ir谩nyul贸 lengyel t枚rekv茅s, k眉l枚n枚sen a v谩llalkoz谩sbar谩t k枚rnyezet kialak铆t谩sa. Ennek keret茅ben Tusk minisztereln枚k k眉l枚n枚sen fontosnak nevezte az egyszer疟s铆t茅s 茅s deregul谩ci贸 felgyors铆t谩s谩t. A magyar kis- 茅s k枚z茅pv谩llalkoz谩sok versenyk茅pess茅ge 茅s a csal谩dok 茅letsz铆nvonal谩nak emel茅se k枚z枚s 茅rdek眉nk.

Az agr谩rium fejleszt茅s茅t c茅lz贸 lengyel program szint茅n p茅lda茅rt茅k疟. A gazd谩k k枚zvetlen t谩mogat谩sa 茅s a vid茅ki k枚z枚ss茅gek fejleszt茅se l茅tfontoss谩g煤 a magyar mez艖gazdas谩g 茅s vid茅k sz谩m谩ra.

V茅g眉l, az energiabiztons谩g er艖s铆t茅se is 茅get艖en sz眉ks茅ges, hiszen az ell谩t谩s biztons谩ga 茅s a megfizethet艖 energia hozz谩f茅rhet艖s茅ge alapvet艖 fontoss谩g煤 a magyar emberek 茅s v谩llalkoz谩sok sz谩m谩ra.

A TISZA k枚z枚ss茅ge teljes m茅rt茅kben t谩mogatja a lengyel eln枚ks茅ggel val贸 egy眉ttm疟k枚d茅st, hogy e k枚z枚s c茅lokat k枚z枚sen, sikeresen megval贸s铆tsuk, 茅s folytassuk hossz煤 bar谩ts谩gunk gy眉m枚lcs枚z艖 munk谩j谩t.

(The sitting was briefly suspended)

VORSITZ: KATARINA BARLEY
痴颈锄别辫谤盲蝉颈诲别苍迟颈苍

(Die Sitzung wird um 12.40 Uhr wieder aufgenommen.)

听听Die Pr盲sidentin. 鈥� Erst eine Mitteilung: Die ESN鈥慒raktion hat der Pr盲sidentin Beschl眉sse 眉ber 脛nderungen von Ernennungen in den Aussch眉ssen 眉bermittelt. Diese Beschl眉sse werden in das Protokoll der heutigen Sitzung aufgenommen und treten am Tag dieser Ank眉ndigung in Kraft.

Weiterhin haben wir einen Antrag zur Gesch盲ftsordnung erhalten.

听听Jo茫o Oliveira (The Left). 鈥� Senhora Presidente, fazemos este ponto de ordem com base no artigo 123.潞 do Regimento relativo 脿 viola莽茫o de direitos humanos.

E fazemo-lo para que o Parlamento Europeu tome uma posi莽茫o de den煤ncia e de condena莽茫o da viola莽茫o de direitos humanos e do direito internacional por a莽茫o do Governo de Netanyahu, que ontem mesmo lan莽ou uma opera莽茫o militar contra o povo palestiniano na Cisjord芒nia.

Na segunda-feira, denunci谩mos aqui a dif铆cil situa莽茫o que se vive na Cisjord芒nia. Na ter莽a-feira, Netanyahu decidiu bombardear o campo de refugiados de Jenin, matando pelo menos dez pessoas.

No primeiro dia do mandato de Donald Trump como presidente dos Estados Unidos, Netanyahu decide levar por diante a sua pol铆tica genocida. E este Parlamento Europeu deve rejeitar essa pol铆tica, deve denunciar as suas consequ锚ncias e exigir o respeito pelo direito internacional.

听听Die Pr盲sidentin. 鈥� Als n盲chster Punkt der Tagesordnung folgt die Abstimmungsstunde.

Ich m枚chte die Mitglieder, die auf der Rednerliste f眉r die erste Aussprache am Nachmittag stehen, daran erinnern, bitte gleich im Plenarsaal zu bleiben, da die Aussprache unmittelbar nach der Abstimmung beginnt.

听听Die Pr盲sidentin. 鈥� Die folgende Abstimmung betrifft den gemeinsamen Entschlie脽ungsantrag von f眉nf Fraktionen zu dem Handlungsbedarf angesichts der fortdauernden Unterdr眉ckung und der Scheinwahlen in Belarus (siehe Punkt 8.1 des Protokolls).

(The vote closed)

(Die Sitzung wird um 12.43 Uhr unterbrochen.)

(Die Sitzung wird um 12.50 Uhr wieder aufgenommen.)

听听Die Pr盲sidentin. 鈥� Das Protokoll der gestrigen Sitzung und die angenommenen Texte sind verf眉gbar. Wenn es keine Einw盲nde gibt von Ihrer Seite, dann ist das Protokoll damit genehmigt, und wir kommen nun zu den Aussprachen.

听听Die Pr盲sidentin. 鈥� Als n盲chster Punkt der Tagesordnung folgt die Aussprache 眉ber ein aktuelles Thema 眉ber die Vereinigung Europas gegen der EU feindlich gegen眉berstehende Akteure: Zeit, unsere Sicherheit und Verteidigung zu st盲rken.

Ich weise die Mitglieder darauf hin, dass bei dieser Aussprache weder spontane Wortmeldungen noch blaue Karten akzeptiert werden.

听听Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Verfasserin. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Die Europ盲ische Union ist das gr枚脽te Friedensprojekt der Welt听鈥� 27听Staaten, die 眉ber Jahrzehnte zueinander gefunden haben und die vor 80听Jahren noch im Krieg miteinander waren. Mit dem Ende des Zweiten Weltkriegs hatten zwei M盲nner, Charles de Gaulle und Konrad Adenauer, den Mut gehabt, sich hinzustellen auf den Tr眉mmern Europas, um f眉r eine friedliche Version Europas zu stehen und zuk眉nftig Kriege zu 眉berwinden. Welch gro脽artige historische Leistung!

Meine Motivation, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen, als ehemalige Bundestagsabgeordnete, mich in dieses Parlament w盲hlen zu lassen, basiert darauf, dass ich mich als Europ盲erin f眉hle und dass wir alle zusammenarbeiten m眉ssen 鈥� 眉ber Grenzen hinweg, weil wir die Herausforderungen nicht mehr national, sondern nur noch gemeinsam leben k枚nnen. Die EU ist gewachsen, weil die L盲nder Sicherheit und auch mehr Wohlstand f眉r ihre Menschen erreichen wollten. Der Druck auf unser Europa war noch nie so gro脽 wie heute. Die Welt ver盲ndert sich rasant, und wir m眉ssen neue Antworten finden. Alte Antworten auf neue Herausforderungen werden nicht funktionieren. Wollen wir die Verantwortung f眉r 450听Millionen Menschen wirklich ernst nehmen und ihnen auch gerecht werden?

Wir haben gestern 眉ber den Wahlausgang in den USA debattiert. Hier gibt es einige, die finden den Ausgang toll, andere sehen ihn mit gro脽er Sorge. Wie auch immer eine Sichtweise ist, wir k枚nnen uns definitiv nicht die Welt machen, wie sie uns gef盲llt. Aber wir k枚nnen Schl眉sse als Europ盲erinnen und Europ盲er daraus ziehen. Wir brauchen ein neues Selbstbewusstsein. Wir m眉ssen uns unserer St盲rke klar werden, im besten Sinne des Wortes. Europa ist ein wunderbarer Kontinent, aber machen wir uns nichts vor: Wir haben uns alle in den L盲ndern und auch hier in der eigenen B眉rokratie derart verstrickt, dass wir gel盲hmt sind. Wir m眉ssen wettbewerbsf盲hig sein und werden, damit Menschen hier bleiben, ihre Ideen bei uns entwickeln, und damit andere Lust haben, in Europa zu investieren.

Meine Damen und Herren, die Sicherheit Europas war noch nie so gef盲hrdet wie heute. Sp盲testens nach dem ersten Angriff Russlands auf die Ukraine im Jahre 2014 wurde uns vor Augen gef眉hrt, dass es Despoten gibt, die im wahrsten Sinne des Wortes wieder Grenzen gewaltsam 眉berschreiten. Die Reaktion auf diesen russischen Angriff auf die Ukraine seitens Europas war erb盲rmlich. Meine Damen und Herren, sie war erb盲rmlich, und die Folgen daraus waren nicht konsequent. Der zweite russische Angriff 2022 fu脽t genau auf dieser Unentschlossenheit, auf diesem dr枚hnenden Schweigen. Putin musste davon ausgehen, dass wir eben nichts entgegenzusetzen haben. Aber wir haben etwas entgegenzusetzen, und wir m眉ssen etwas entgegensetzen, wenn wir in Zukunft in Frieden und Freiheit weiterhin leben wollen.

Sicherheit und Verteidigung liegt in der Hand der einzelnen Nationalstaaten. Wer allerdings glaubt, dass jedes Land sich selbst verteidigen kann, der irrt. Ausschlie脽lich gemeinsam ist dies m枚glich. Die EU hat jetzt reagiert und zum ersten Mal in der Geschichte einen Kommissar f眉r Verteidigung und Sicherheit etabliert. Das Parlament hat aus dem Unterausschuss Verteidigung einen Hauptausschuss gemacht. An dieser Stelle danke ich allen sehr, die sich so konstruktiv an diesem Prozess beteiligt haben. Aber das muss jetzt auch mit Leben erf眉llt werden. Zur Realit盲t geh枚rt, dass es ein weiter Weg noch ist, bis wir uns gemeinsam und wirkungsvoll verteidigen k枚nnen 鈥� 眉brigens in Zusammenarbeit mit der NATO. Wir wollen hier keine Parallelstrukturen aufbauen, sondern gemeinsam diesen Weg einschlagen.

Meine Damen und Herren, wir sind in der Tat unterschiedliche L盲nder, unterschiedliche Sichtweisen und haben logischerweise unterschiedliche Interessen, zumal wir in unterschiedlichen geografischen Gegenden zu Hause sind. Es macht einen Unterschied, wo man lebt. Viele Mitglieder in der EU haben eine russische Grenze. Kollegen sind noch in der Sowjetunion aufgewachsen; sie wissen, was Unfreiheit bedeutet. Deren Blick ist ein v枚llig anderer als derer, die im Herzen Europas leben, wie wir in Deutschland, umzingelt von Freunden. Unsere s眉deurop盲ischen Partner zum Beispiel blicken auf das Mittelmeer in seiner Sch枚nheit, aber eben auch in seiner Herausforderung. Meine Damen und Herren, Premierminister Tusk hat es gerade gesagt: Bei allen unterschiedlichen Sichtweisen werden wir Kompromisse schlie脽en m眉ssen. Ja, es gibt hier vor allem auf der rechten Seite des Hauses Mitglieder bzw. Parteien, die haben sich hier reinw盲hlen lassen 鈥� das muss man sich auf der Zunge zergehen lassen 鈥�, um nicht f眉r Europa zu streiten, sondern um dieses Parlament vorzuf眉hren und den nationalistischen Weg zu gehen.

Deswegen mein Appell: Wir als Demokraten in der Mitte dieses Hauses听鈥撎齟s ist wirklich unertr盲glich, was wir hier sehen. Es gibt Mitglieder, die wollen das Geld Europas, aber sie wollen nicht unsere Union erhalten und verbessern, so wie wir es wollen. Deswegen, meine Damen und Herren, abschlie脽end: Die L盲nder au脽erhalb der Europ盲ischen Union sind nicht an unserem Wohl interessiert. Wenn wir nicht an uns glauben, wenn wir nicht das Wohl Europas wollen, wer dann? Das geht nur gemeinsam. Sch枚n, dass gerade von rechts der Einwurf kam. Wir haben die richtige Richtung eingeschlagen. Lassen Sie uns zusammen f眉r dieses Europa streiten, es verteidigen und den Feinden der Freiheit zeigen, wie stark wir sind!

听听Adam Sz艂apka, President-in-Office of the Council. 鈥� Madam听President, honourable Members, Commissioner, first of all, I welcome the topic of this debate. Enhancing EU security is the cornerstone of the Polish EU Presidency. The EU leaders are going to have an informal exchange of views on European defence in two weeks' time, close to Brussels. The NATO Secretary鈥慓eneral and the UK Prime Minister are due to join them to ensure a broader perspective of the challenge.

Indeed, we are faced with a complex, multi-layered threat landscape. Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine now enters its third year. Our adversaries are increasingly using hybrid threats to undermine, influence and erase our democratic and economic system and our institutions. Cyberattacks, information manipulation, sabotage against our critical infrastructure, instrumentalisation of migration, as well as outright military aggression are a part of one single continuum. The variety of threats I just described is a stark reminder that we need to rapidly step up our efforts in security and defence. This implies strengthening our resilience and enhancing our preparedness for all sorts of contingencies.

In the last few years, we have taken important steps forward, notably in support of Ukraine, including with lethal means and training. We must stay the course. Investing in the security of Ukraine means investing in our own security. Ukraine urgently needs more ammunitions and missiles, air defence systems and interceptors, and support for maintenance and repair.

But the heavy鈥憀ifting must also be done closer to home. More than 30 years of under-investment have had its toll on the Member States' defence capacities. Recent increases in defence spending are an important step in the right direction, but not enough. We need to spend substantially more, but also better and faster. By working together, we can address critical capabilities gaps, ramp up production capacity across Europe and mobilise additional funding. In this context, we must also strengthen our relationship with our strategic partners, especially our NATO partners. The European Defence Industry Strategy and its related programme will act as an important building block for this. The role of the European 合法博彩网站 as co-legislator is crucial in order to agree rapidly on an ambitious programme. The Council is also awaiting the forthcoming Commission white paper on military capabilities, the defence industry and the required funding.

We have also given ourselves new instruments and tools to tackle cyber and hybrid threats. With the EU rapid deployment capacity, we have an important new military tool to help in crisis situations, for example, to rescue and evacuate our citizens.

President, honourable Members, Commissioner, let me finish by stressing the importance of European unity at such testing times for international peace and security. Our challenges are complex, but they can be tackled if we remain united in our actions. Thank you very much for your attention.

听听Dubravka 艩uica, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Dear honourable Members, to respond to the complex threat landscape, we have made the defence and security of our citizens a top priority of this Commission's mandate. Russia's brutal and unprovoked aggression against Ukraine now enters into its third year. Our adversaries are increasingly using hybrid threats to undermine and influence our democratic and economic systems and our institutions. Cyberattacks, information manipulation, interference in campaigns, arson, vandalism, sabotage against our critical infrastructure (notably the recent subsea cable incidents), instrumentalisation of migration, as well as an outright military aggression 鈥� this is all part of one single threat continuum. We need to be united to strengthen our security and defence, to build a genuine defence union.

In the last few years, we have taken important steps forward, notably in support of Ukraine. I will repeat what was said by the Council: the Commission's agenda is based on the conviction that the best investment in European security is investing in the security of Ukraine. The European Union has also invested in our defence industrial readiness with the following tangible initiatives: the European Defence Fund, the Act in Support of Ammunition Production, and through support to the joint procurement of defence products through the European defence industry reinforcement through common procurement Act (EDIRPA). We will have to ramp up our defence production to address the defence capabilities gaps and the shortfalls in military material. This means spending substantially more but also better.

As the European Union, we provide added value, European scale, European coordination and European funding to support joint funding or joint investment across the board, not just on ammunition but in all areas of defence production. The European defence industrial strategy and the proposal for a European defence industry programme are important building blocks for this.

We should also not forget the key potential of building synergies when funding dual鈥憉se technologies. The role of the European 合法博彩网站 as co-legislator is vital in order to rapidly deliver an ambitious European defence industry programme (EDIP) and support the Commission's agenda. We also need modernisation and innovation and we need to get to work on our projects of common interest 鈥� our defence shields for air and for space. To prepare the way ahead, the forthcoming white paper will address the military capabilities, defence industry and funding which is required in order for the European Union and for our Member States to step up rapidly, in line with NATO capability targets.

Security and defence remain intrinsically linked with transatlantic security. Together with the white paper on defence and the Union preparedness strategy, which will respond to different threats, scenarios and security challenges, as well as the new cybersecurity crisis management blueprint, the new European internal security strategy will set the stage for the European Union's work on preparedness, security and defence. The internal security strategy will cover all threats, both online and offline. We will ensure, and this will ensure, that security is integrated in European Union legislation and policies by design.

In parallel, our security calls for improving our ability to cope with many armed conflicts and surging crises in the European Union's wider neighbourhood. The European Union's 22 common security and defence policy missions and operations are testament to the global volatile security environment. With the European Union's rapid deployment capacity, we have an important new military tool to help in crisis situations, for example, the rescue and evacuation of our citizens.

To conclude, strengthening the European Union's security and defence capabilities requires a comprehensive, cross-sectoral, cross-border approach. And we count on the European 合法博彩网站's support in putting the European Union on track to protect our people.

听听Christophe Gomart, au nom du groupe PPE. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, chers coll猫gues, notre ordre mondial est bouscul茅 par Donald Trump. 脌 pr茅sent, 350听millions d鈥橝m茅ricains ne sont plus pr锚ts 脿 payer pour 450听millions d鈥橢urop茅ens. O霉 est l鈥橢urope? Certains se d茅sinscrivent de X, d鈥檃utres jouent d茅j脿 la solidarit茅 am茅ricaine plut么t qu鈥檈urop茅enne. Trump avance pourtant sans masque: il veut nous diviser et nous transformer en place du march茅 pour les Am茅ricains.

J鈥檃ppelle donc 脿 un r茅veil europ茅en et 脿 une coop茅ration sinc猫re entre nous. Acheter davantage am茅ricain en Europe, c鈥檈st d茅truire tout espoir d鈥檃utonomie strat茅gique. Prenons l鈥檈xemple de l鈥檈space: ce sont nos donn茅es, notre navigation, nos communications, notre observation de la Terre. Sans l鈥檈space, l鈥橴kraine ne pourrait plus faire la guerre. Notre autonomie dans l鈥檈space devrait donc 锚tre notre priorit茅, et notre coop茅ration une 茅vidence.

Pourtant, que se passe-t-il? Nos champions sont en difficult茅. En听2024, l鈥橧talien Vega a lanc茅 deux fus茅es, le Fran莽ais ArianeGroup une seule, quand SpaceX en lance une tous les deux jours et demi. Qu鈥檃ttendons-nous pour concentrer nos forces et utiliser en priorit茅 nos lanceurs europ茅ens? Enfin, en avoir, c鈥檈st bien, 脿 condition de savoir aussi les prot茅ger. C鈥檈st un sujet connexe, 脿 traiter d鈥檜rgence.

听听Sven Mikser, on behalf of the S&D Group. 鈥� Madam President, colleagues, European security is at a precarious point. While Russia's bloody war of aggression against an EU candidate country 鈥� Ukraine 鈥� is grinding on, we are also seeing an increase in provocations and acts of sabotage against EU Member States' interests and infrastructure, and ever bolder attempts by Russia and others to wage hostile information operations and interfere in our democratic processes.

In order to meet these extraordinary challenges we need to get our act together. This inevitably involves an increase in defence expenditure, both in individual Member States as well as at the Union level, to properly finance our joint instruments and programmes, to boost our defence industrial capacity, to maintain our technological sovereignty, address critical capability gaps and improve our overall resilience and readiness to act.

Increasing our defence spending and improving our defence industrial capacity and competitiveness are almost universally recognised as priorities by pro-European political forces, and so is the need to continue our assistance to Ukraine in the fight against Russian aggressors. But in these uncertain times, it is absolutely imperative that there is strong public support in all our societies for what the political leaders see as our strategic goals on the global stage.

It is deeply alarming that some of the hostile information operations in our partner countries, but also within the EU, are bearing fruit, boosting the standing of anti-EU and pro-Russian parties and politicians, and weakening the cohesiveness of our societies and our ability to swiftly respond to external threats. It is also deeply unsettling to see that actors from countries we regard as our allies are starting to engage in similar activities.

Improving our defence readiness will not come for free. That is a significant price tag that our taxpayers will have to pay. In order to make sure that the European people continue to rally behind our efforts to protect our territories, our democracy and European values we need to make sure that we see this important endeavour through in a responsible and socially just way, without alienating large swaths of our societies and making them vulnerable to the machinations of our adversaries.

听听Alberico Gambino, a nome del gruppo ECR. 鈥� Signora Presidente, signora Commissaria, onorevoli colleghi, sentiamo spesso parlare di pace, ma, come richiamato dalla Presidente del Consiglio dei ministri italiano, onorevole Giorgia Meloni, la pace non 猫 un diritto acquisito, n茅 qualcosa di eterno: 猫 una conquista quotidiana che richiede impegno e determinazione.

A chi critica le spese per la difesa, ricordo che esse servono a garantire sicurezza, servono a ricostruire stabilit脿 in terre devastate dai conflitti e servono a essere un deterrente per tenere lontane le minacce dalle nostre comunit脿.

Parlare di difesa non significa abbracciare una logica bellicistica, ma garantire sicurezza e benessere ai cittadini europei. Ed 猫 per questo che dobbiamo essere quanto pi霉 ambiziosi e pragmatici possibile e far s矛 che, appunto, gli investimenti 鈥� e sottolineo, investimenti 鈥� per la difesa debbano essere tenuti fuori dal patto di stabilit脿. Solo in questo modo potremo costruire un'Europa pi霉 preparata nel rispondere alle sfide globali che ci attendono.

Un'Europa forte e coesa non significa un'Europa che rinuncia alle sue sovranit脿 nazionali, ma un'Europa che si pone come garante della pace e della sicurezza per tutti i suoi popoli. Questo dobbiamo affermarlo con chiarezza e orgoglio.

听听Hilde Vautmans, namens de Renew-Fractie. 鈥� Voorzitter, in maart komt de Commissie met een witboek voor defensie. Ik heb er alle vertrouwen in dat de Commissie daarbij zeer goed en ambitieus te werk gaat. In de Raad en de lidstaten heb ik echter minder vertrouwen, vanwege hun eerder vertoonde kortzichtigheid. De lidstaten hebben sinds de vaststelling van het eerste Europese defensieplan in 1954 niets anders gedaan dan dwarsliggen. Er wordt al ruim zeventig jaar gesproken over Europese defensie. Als we deze nu niet tot stand brengen, wanneer dan wel?

We moeten strijden voor onze collectieve veiligheid. We kunnen niet langer op de Amerikanen rekenen om ons te hulp te schieten. Dit zal niet zomaar overwaaien: president听Trump is een symptoom van een veranderende Amerikaanse samenleving.

Onze burgers verwachten dat we investeren in defensie en veiligheid en hun belastinggeld effici毛nt besteden. We moeten werkgelegenheid scheppen en aan de industrie werken.

Ik hoop dan ook dat het plan van de Commissie zeer ambitieus is en een Europees leger omvat. Met het besteden van meer middelen op dezelfde manier komen we namelijk nergens. De Commissie moet bij de lidstaten lobbyen en ervoor zorgen dat ze samen meer dan alleen hun eigen 5听% uitgeven en deze middelen bovendien anders besteden. Het is nu of nooit voor het voortbestaan van ons continent.

听听Hannah Neumann, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group. 鈥� Madam President, dear colleagues, a 155听mm shell of a German manufacturer can't be used in a French howitzer, making it even more difficult for Ukrainians to defend their country against Russian aggression. That is where we stand, 25 years into the Common Security and Defence Policy.

For five years, I have been a Member of this House. We have written strategies, handed out subsidies, backed Member States to cooperate. And their response? Thanks for the money, but leave the rest to us. All of them putting national egoism above the security of European citizens and that of our friends in Ukraine, failing to come together to fix the problems we have. Nowhere is this failure more apparent than in cybersecurity. We are building our digital societies on technology controlled by a man in the White House threatening to annex Canada along with his Nazi鈥憇aluting sidekick. Attribution of cyber attacks? We need to ask the Americans storing our data. Our companies do it in the US. Secure processors? We buy them from the US IT experts. We are lacking 1 million. This, my dear colleagues, is beyond naive.

What use are another 4听000 battle tanks if Russians can hack our command and control structure? What use are another 4听000 battle tanks if our elections are manipulated by algorithms of TikTok and X? There is only one response to Russian aggression and to Make America Great Again 鈥� it's Europe united, including in defence. When we speak of defence, let's not forget cyber.

听听Marc Botenga, au nom du groupe The Left. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Commission, Conseil, 芦il faut augmenter nos d茅penses militaires禄. Vous le r茅p茅tez de mani猫re obstin茅e, 芦augmentez vos d茅penses militaires禄, tout en cherchant 脿 convaincre les gens qu鈥檌l n鈥檡 a plus d鈥檃rgent pour les salaires, pour les pensions, pour les factures d鈥櫭﹏ergie. Qu鈥檌l n鈥檡 aura ni m茅decin 脿 l鈥檋么pital ni salle disponible aux urgences. Qu鈥櫭� l鈥櫭ヽole, les enfants seront entass茅s dans des classes petites et froides, sans enseignant. Mais qu鈥檌l faut augmenter les d茅penses militaires!

D茅masquons cette supercherie, car il s鈥檃girait de se d茅fendre contre la Russie. Je veux bien, mais les d茅penses de l鈥橭TAN sont d茅j脿 pr猫s de dix fois sup茅rieures 脿 celles de la Russie. Je ne dis pas que nous devrions pour cette raison 锚tre dix fois plus puissants que la Russie, mais, ne pas arriver 脿 se d茅fendre avec ce budget, c鈥檈st quand m锚me un peu dingue. O霉 va cet argent? Que faites-vous de cet argent? Et, surtout, combien d鈥檃rgent allez-vous encore prendre aux soins de sant茅 pour le mettre dans le militaire?

Avant de vider les poches des travailleurs pour remplir celles des actionnaires des multinationales am茅ricaines, expliquez-moi un peu ce qui est fait, actuellement, de l鈥檃rgent d茅pens茅 pour le militaire et pour les armes. Et voyons o霉 nous pourrons rationaliser.

听听Hans Neuhoff, im Namen der ESN-Fraktion. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, Kolleginnen und Kollegen! 鈥濿ir m眉ssen mit den Realit盲ten wirtschaften und nicht mit Fiktionen鈥�, sagte einst Otto von Bismarck. Ihre erste Fiktion besteht in dem Glauben, die internationalen Beziehungen w眉rden einer verbindlichen Rechtsordnung unterliegen. Die Realit盲t besteht darin, dass das System der internationalen Beziehungen anarchisch ist. Es unterliegt dem Prinzip der Macht.

Eine zweite Fiktion ist, dass Russland, eine milit盲rische Gro脽macht, es hinnehmen wird, wenn die NATO in ihr strategisches Vorfeld eindringt. Die Realit盲t ist, dass Russland die Aufnahme der Ukraine in die NATO als existenzielle Bedrohung betrachtet und milit盲risch vereiteln wird. Wir k枚nnen das verurteilen 鈥� 盲ndern k枚nnen wir es nicht. Die Folgefiktion ist, dass die EU Russland als Feind betrachtet, der demn盲chst auch einen Mitgliedstaat angreifen wird. Die Wahrheit ist 鈥� und ich kann mich hier auf den Geheimdienstchef der NATO berufen 鈥�, dass es keinerlei Hinweis auf solche Absichten der russischen F眉hrung gibt und im 脺brigen auch kein Motiv f眉r eine solche Kamikaze鈥慉ktion.

Meine Damen und Herren, die Weltordnung befindet sich im Umbruch. Die alte Ordnung ist versunken, die neue Ordnung ist noch nicht da. Ein solcher Zustand gebiert Ungeheuer. Anstatt aber in Hysterie zu verfallen, sollten wir den Verstand anschalten. Und was wir dann brauchen, ist eine umfassende und realistische Risikoanalyse. Wir von den Souver盲nisten unterst眉tzen ausdr眉cklich den Aufbau einer unabh盲ngigen europ盲ischen Verteidigungsf盲higkeit. Unabh盲ngig muss aber hei脽en: unabh盲ngig; unabh盲ngig von au脽ereurop盲ischen M盲chten, unabh盲ngig auch von den USA. Der Vorschlag von Generalsekret盲r Rutte, die Gunst der USA zu kaufen, indem wir unsere Zwei鈥慞rozent-Plus鈥慚ittel der amerikanischen R眉stungsindustrie in den Rachen werfen, ist an Torheit kaum zu 眉berbieten. Die franz枚sische Position, dieses Geld allein in europ盲ische Entwicklung und Produktion zu investieren, ist dagegen richtig. Wir m眉ssen mit den Realit盲ten wirtschaften und nicht mit Fiktionen.

听听Wouter Beke (PPE). 鈥� Voorzitter, volgens听Donald听Tusk moeten we niet vragen wat Amerika voor onze veiligheid kan doen, maar moeten we onszelf vragen wat wij voor onze veiligheid kunnen doen. In deze tijd van geopolitieke spanningen kunnen we niet blind vertrouwen听op de Amerikaanse veiligheidsparaplu. Trump is tot president verkozen. Poetin zaait chaos, zowel aan onze grenzen als in het hart van onze democratie. Hybride aanvallen en cyberaanvallen zijn schering en inslag.

We moeten meer dan ooit onze rug rechten. Dit kunnen we alleen als we samenwerken; niet alleen in Europa, maar ook daarbuiten, om stabiele regio's aan onze grenzen tot stand te brengen. Daartoe moeten we niet alleen onze defensie-industrie en militaire uitgaven versterken, die noodzakelijk zijn, maar moeten we ook assertiever en daadkrachtiger zijn.

In 1991 stelde voormalig premier Mark听Eyskens schamper dat Europa een economische reus, een politieke dwerg en een militaire worm is. Laten we ervoor zorgen dat die militaire worm tot het verleden behoort.

听听螕喂维谓谓畏蟼 螠伪谓喂维蟿畏蟼 (S&D). 鈥� 螝蠀蟻委伪 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 伪纬伪蟺畏蟿慰委 蟽蠀谓维未蔚位蠁慰喂, 畏 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏 尾蟻委蟽魏蔚蟿伪喂 伪谓蟿喂渭苇蟿蠅蟺畏 渭蔚 渭喂伪 蟽蔚喂蟻维 伪蟺蠈 喂蟽蟿慰蟻喂魏维 蟺蟻蠅蟿蠈纬谓蠅蟻蔚蟼 蟺蟻慰魏位萎蟽蔚喂蟼. 螒蟺蠈 蟿慰谓 蔚蟺蔚魏蟿伪蟿喂魏蠈 蟺蠈位蔚渭慰 蟿畏蟼 巍蠅蟽委伪蟼 蟽蟿畏谓 螣蠀魏蟻伪谓委伪, 蟿畏谓 伪谓伪胃蔚蠅蟻畏蟿喂魏萎 蟺蟻伪魏蟿喂魏萎 蟿畏蟼 韦慰蠀蟻魏委伪蟼 蟽蟿慰 螒喂纬伪委慰 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 螒谓伪蟿慰位喂魏萎 螠蔚蟽蠈纬蔚喂慰, 蟿畏谓 魏蟻委蟽畏 蟽蟿畏 螠苇蟽畏 螒谓伪蟿慰位萎, 苇蠅蟼 魏伪喂 蟿喂蟼 蠀尾蟻喂未喂魏苇蟼 蔚蟺喂胃苇蟽蔚喂蟼 魏伪蟿维 蟿畏蟼 未畏渭慰魏蟻伪蟿委伪蟼 魏伪喂 蟿蠅谓 魏慰喂谓蠅谓喂蠋谓 渭伪蟼. 危萎渭蔚蟻伪, 蟺蔚蟻喂蟽蟽蠈蟿蔚蟻慰 伪蟺蠈 蟺慰蟿苇, 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 蟽蟿伪胃慰蠉渭蔚 蔚谓蠅渭苇谓慰喂 渭蟺蟻慰蟽蟿维 蟽蟿喂蟼 纬蔚蠅蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏苇蟼 伪蟺蔚喂位苇蟼, 蟿喂蟼 蠂蠋蟻蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蟿慰蠀蟼 蟺伪蟻维纬慰谓蟿蔚蟼 蟺慰蠀 胃苇位慰蠀谓 谓伪 渭伪蟼 未喂蠂维蟽慰蠀谓 魏伪喂 谓伪 渭伪蟼 伪蟺慰未蠀谓伪渭蠋蟽慰蠀谓. 螚 蟽蠀谓蔚蟻纬伪蟽委伪 蟽蟿畏谓 伪蟽蠁维位蔚喂伪 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 维渭蠀谓伪 蔚委谓伪喂 魏蟻委蟽喂渭畏 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 蟺蟻慰蟽蟿伪蟽委伪 蟿蠅谓 蟺慰位喂蟿蠋谓, 纬喂伪 蟿畏 未喂伪蟽蠁维位喂蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 蔚喂蟻萎谓畏蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏蟼 蟽蟿伪胃蔚蟻蠈蟿畏蟿伪蟼 蟽蟿畏谓 蟺蔚蟻喂慰蠂萎 渭伪蟼. 螜未喂伪委蟿蔚蟻伪 渭蔚蟿维 蟿畏 螖蔚蠀蟿苇蟻伪 渭蔚 蟿畏 未喂慰委魏畏蟽畏 韦蟻伪渭蟺 未蔚谓 苇蠂慰蠀渭蔚 魏伪谓苇谓伪 蟺蔚蟻喂胃蠋蟻喂慰 纬喂伪 伪蠀蟿伪蟺维蟿蔚蟼. 螚 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏 慰蠁蔚委位蔚喂 谓伪 蠀蟺蔚蟻伪蟽蟺喂蟽蟿蔚委 渭蠈谓畏 蟿慰蠀蟼 蟺慰位委蟿蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蟿伪 蟽蠉谓慰蟻维 蟿畏蟼, 谓伪 蔚蟺蔚谓未蠉蟽蔚喂 蟽蔚 魏伪喂谓慰蟿蠈渭蔚蟼 蟿蔚蠂谓慰位慰纬委蔚蟼, 谓伪 蔚谓喂蟽蠂蠉蟽蔚喂 蟿畏谓 伪渭蠀谓蟿喂魏萎 蟿畏蟼 尾喂慰渭畏蠂伪谓委伪 渭蔚 魏慰喂谓维 蟺蟻慰纬蟻维渭渭伪蟿伪, 魏慰喂谓苇蟼 蟺伪蟻伪纬纬蔚位委蔚蟼, 伪位位维 魏伪喂 渭喂伪 伪渭蠀谓蟿喂魏萎 尾喂慰渭畏蠂伪谓喂魏萎 尾维蟽畏 蟺慰蠀 未蔚谓 胃伪 蟺蔚蟻喂慰蟻委味蔚蟿伪喂 渭蠈谓慰 蟽蔚 魏维蟺慰喂蔚蟼 蠂蠋蟻蔚蟼. 螠蠈谓慰 苇蟿蟽喂 胃伪 魏伪蟿伪蠁苇蟻慰蠀渭蔚 谓伪 伪谓蟿伪蟺慰魏蟻喂胃慰蠉渭蔚 蟽蟿喂蟼 蟺蟻慰魏位萎蟽蔚喂蟼 蟿慰蠀 渭苇位位慰谓蟿慰蟼.

听听Roberto Vannacci (PfE). 鈥� Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, circa due anni fa il presidente Draghi, quello che ha scritto il noto rapporto, ci disse: "Volete la pace o il condizionatore?"

Ecco, oggi non abbiamo n茅 l'uno n茅 l'altro, perch茅 in Ucraina tuonano i cannoni e il condizionatore non lo possiamo accendere per il grande costo dell'energia.

Incrementare le spese in difesa, con un crescente costo dell'energia e delle materie prime, ci ridurr脿, come nel caso Draghi, a non avere n茅 burro n茅 cannoni. Se vogliamo avere entrambi 鈥� il burro e i cannoni 鈥� dobbiamo far scendere il costo dell'energia e delle materie prime, che sarebbe l'unico provvedimento che rilancerebbe tutta l'economia nella zona europea.

Ma per fare questo dobbiamo parlare con la Commissione, che sembrerebbe anteporre altri interessi a quelli dei paesi europei. E dobbiamo parlare con chi ha chiuso le valvole del gas che fluiva dall'Ucraina in Europa e che ha causato l'immediato incremento dei prezzi e delle bollette, che poi paghiamo noi cittadini europei. Ma soprattutto dovremmo volerla, la pace, a tutti i costi, non averne il terrore, come sembrate averne voi, signori della Commissione, e voi, signori del Consiglio.

听听Reinis Poz艈aks (ECR). 鈥� Labdien, priek拧s膿d膿t膩jas kundze! Labdien, cien墨jamie kol膿模i! T膩 nu gad墨j膩s, ka man n膩c膩s ar墨 piedzimt Padomju Savien墨b膩 un k膩du br墨di tur pavad墨t. Un tad, kad tas viss sabruka un m膿s atguv膩m savu neatkar墨bu, visi bij膩m 募oti priec墨gi, ka kara jau nu Eirop膩 vairs piln墨gi noteikti nekad neb奴s. Viss ir sadal墨ts, viss priec墨gi, bet realit膩te ir cita.

Izr膩d墨j膩s, laiki main膩s, un es piekr墨tu kol膿模im iepriek拧 teiktajam, ka mums ir j膩samierin膩s ar jauno realit膩ti. Jaun膩 realit膩te ir t膩, ka, ja m膿s gribam saglab膩t m奴su Eiropas v膿rt墨bas, tad mums ir j膩k募奴st fiziski sp膿c墨giem un j膩sp膿j fiziski ar墨 t膩s aizst膩v膿t. Tas vien墨gais veids, k膩 拧o karu nov膿rst, ja to dara pr膩t墨gi. T膩 nav v膿j膩 izmesta nauda, t膩 ir invest墨cija darbaviet膩s, invest墨cijas ekonomik膩 un taj膩 skait膩 ar墨 m膩jok募os un, ja k膩ds t膩 nedom膩, lai apskat膩s k膩da ir m膩jok募u situ膩cija 拧obr墨d Bahmut膩, Severodo艈eck膩 vai Rube啪naj膩, vai jebkur citur, kur pabiju拧i krievu atbr墨vot膩ji.

听听Nathalie Loiseau (Renew). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, et si Donald Trump avait raison? Et si nous devions faire plus pour nous d茅fendre? La r茅ponse est oui, 茅videmment.

On ne sous-traite pas sa s茅curit茅, sauf 脿 dire qu鈥檕n ne la prend pas au s茅rieux. Il a fallu l鈥檃gression russe contre l鈥橴kraine pour que nous commencions 脿 nous r茅veiller. Il va peut 锚tre falloir une deuxi猫me pr茅sidence Trump pour que nous nous levions enfin. Renforcer la d茅fense europ茅enne n鈥檃 rien d鈥檜ne marotte id茅ologique. C鈥檈st ce que nos compatriotes nous demandent, 脿 juste titre et avec insistance. Renforcer la d茅fense europ茅enne, ce n鈥檈st pas non plus faire un petit peu plus sans rien changer 脿 nos habitudes.

Avec le livre blanc sur la d茅fense, avec le programme europ茅en pour l鈥檌ndustrie de la d茅fense, nous pouvons soit amorcer un vrai changement dans la bonne direction, soit rater le coche. Il nous faut renforcer notre industrie de d茅fense, non plus en saupoudrant nos soutiens, mais en consolidant des poids lourds europ茅ens. Il nous faut nous affirmer davantage dans l鈥橭TAN, non contre elle, et faire en sorte que notre voix compte. Il faut faire de l鈥橝lliance atlantique ce qu鈥檈lle aurait toujours d没 锚tre: un partenariat entre alli茅s qui se respectent.

Nous devons cesser de tout attendre des 脡tats-Unis, mais aussi d鈥檃cheter notre tranquillit茅 en achetant 脿 tour de bras des armes am茅ricaines. La d茅fense europ茅enne ne progressera qu鈥檃u prix d鈥檜ne pr茅f茅rence europ茅enne. Maintenant que nous sommes r茅veill茅s, mettons-nous debout sans tarder, car c鈥檈st 脿 nos portes que la guerre gronde.

听听Merja Kyll枚nen (The Left). 鈥� Arvoisa puhemies, sotilaallista uhkaa, hybridivaikuttamista It盲merell盲 ja teknologiaj盲ttien vaalivaikuttamista: Eurooppa kohtaa monenlaista uhkaa. Meid盲n on pystytt盲v盲 vastaamaan n盲ihin uhkiin uskottavasti ja p盲盲tt盲v盲isesti. Turvallisuuden ja puolustuksen vahvistamisessa on huomioitava koko yhteiskunta siviileist盲 puolustukseen.

EU:n on kyett盲v盲 seisomaan omilla jaloillaan ilman riippuvuutta ulkopuolisesta teknologiasta tai Yhdysvaltojen sotilaallisesta tuesta. Liian pitk盲盲n olemme luottaneet ulkopuolisen auttavaan k盲teen kriisitilanteissa. T盲m盲 ei en盲盲 toimi, sill盲 Yhdysvaltojen painopiste on siirtynyt pois Euroopasta.

Me Suomessa tied盲mme, ett盲 todellinen turva on rakennettava aivan itse. Siksi EU:n on panostettava rajatylitt盲v盲盲n puolustusteollisuuteen ja kokonaisturvallisuuden kehitt盲miseen. Meid盲n on rakennettava eurooppalaista turvallisuutta yhdess盲 ja itsen盲isesti.

听听Ond艡ej Dost谩l (NI). 鈥� Pan铆 p艡edsedaj铆c铆, v谩啪en铆 kolegov茅, po zvolen铆 Donalda Trumpa si 艡ekn臎me na rovinu: bezpe膷nosti Evropy u拧kod铆, pokud budeme sponzorovat americk茅 zbroja艡e a v茅st ciz铆 v谩lky. 膶esk谩 republika zaplatila stamiliardy za americk茅 F-35 st铆ha膷ky, kter茅 sv臎t nevid臎l, proto啪e dod谩ny n谩m budou mo啪n谩 za p臎t, mo啪n谩 za deset let a mezit铆m je拧t臎 zdra啪铆. Na tohle se m谩me zadlu啪ovat? Na tohle m谩me br谩t pen铆ze z d暖chod暖 nebo ze zdravotnictv铆? Kdy啪 u啪 zbroj铆me, tak pros铆m nakupujme alespo艌 v Evrop臎. Pokud jde o v谩lky, nem谩me d暖vod bojovat ciz铆 v谩lky, jako tu na Ukrajin臎, kter谩 za膷ala p艡evratem v roce 2014 podn铆cen媒m miliardami ze Spojen媒ch st谩t暖. Neb媒t Brit暖, tak u啪 tato v谩lka byla dva roky ukon膷ena. Nejlep拧铆m 艡e拧en铆m z hlediska bezpe膷nosti Evropy je ukrajinsk谩 neutralita a obnova norm谩ln铆ch vztah暖. Toto je jedin茅 dosa啪iteln茅 艡e拧en铆. Na拧铆 bezpe膷nosti neprosp臎je ani podporovat p艡evraty v Gruzii nebo v B臎lorusku a zni膷it tyto zem臎 podobn臎, jako byla zni膷ena S媒rie. Pros铆m toto vezm臎me v potaz, kdy啪 se bav铆me o bezpe膷nosti Evropy v budouc铆ch letech.

听听Riho Terras (PPE). 鈥� Madam听President, colleagues, now more than ever, we must do and not only declare, and strengthen our security and defence. We need to follow a basic principle: put money where your mouth is. There is no threat more existential than the threat to our security. And there is no other way to handle it than to do it the united way.

The only way we can really step up against the hostile actors in the East is to invest in our defence capabilities. The 2听% of GDP was yesterday. It was a peacetime minimum. Today, we are at war, even if some people are having difficulties to admit it. The EU Member States on the eastern flank have increased their defence spending dramatically. Some countries are paying close to 5听% of GDP today. I believe there must be a Union鈥憌ide benchmark established for all members to demonstrate unity. As Prime Minister Tusk said, it should be 5听% of GDP.

听听Tobias Cremer (S&D). 鈥� Madam听President, dear colleagues, a lot of people have called Trump's re-election a wake鈥憉p call, also in this Chamber. But when it comes to defence, Trump's election is not a wake鈥憉p call; it's the alarm sounding again after us hitting the snooze button over years, again and again. So this is not the time for Europe to merely wake up, but to finally get up and to face up to the new geopolitical realities that the United States will increasingly turn its attention towards Asia, and that we must take greater responsibility for our own security right here.

And, colleagues, we must not interpret every Trumpian provocation literally. But when it comes to defence, you must finally take him seriously. And that means that we need to get our own house in order. We need to spend more and better on defence while strengthening our social cohesion and resilience. We need to streamline and democratise our decision鈥憁aking processes in the defence area, and we need a strong and united Europe that has the capacity, but also the courage to act boldly. Such a Europe is in our own self-interest, but it is also a strong ally that even Mr听Trump will not want to lose.

听听Christophe Bay (PfE). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, l鈥檌d茅e d鈥檜nir l鈥橢urope contre les acteurs que l鈥橴nion europ茅enne juge hostiles pourrait, en th茅orie, 锚tre s茅duisante. Dans la pratique, elle s鈥檌nscrit h茅las dans une logique qui alimente les d茅rives bureaucratiques et interventionnistes dont souffre d茅j脿 cette institution.

Au lieu de respecter les souverainet茅s nationales et de s鈥檈n tenir 脿 son r么le initial, l鈥橴nion europ茅enne, encore une fois, semble vouloir empi茅ter sur des pr茅rogatives qui ne sont pas les siennes. L鈥檈xemple parfait en est la cr茅ation d鈥檜ne commission 芦d茅fense禄. D鈥檃illeurs, qu鈥檈ntendez vous par 芦acteurs hostiles禄? Cette d茅finition, floue et volontairement impr茅cise, semble taill茅e sur mesure pour justifier toutes les d茅rives. Est-ce la Russie? Est-ce la Chine, l鈥橝m茅rique de Trump, les narcotrafiquants internationaux ou les organisations terroristes islamistes? Ou bien s鈥檃git-il d鈥檜n moyen d茅tourn茅 pour imposer un programme bruxellois poussant 脿 davantage d鈥檌ng茅rence dans les affaires nationales?

Au Rassemblement national, nous avons une autre vision. La d茅fense est une question qui touche au c艙ur de la souverainet茅 d鈥檜ne nation. Il est imp茅ratif que chaque 脡tat membre conserve la ma卯trise de ses forces arm茅es, de ses alliances strat茅giques et de ses choix budg茅taires. Si nous devons coop茅rer en Europe, c鈥檈st 脿 travers des accords d鈥櫭塼at 脿 脡tat.

听听Alexandr Vondra (ECR). 鈥� Madam President, we are saying nothing new when we call for a more proactive, more assertive approach to European defence. The message from across the Atlantic is crystal clear: take greater responsibility for your own safety. We can set aside the debate about the percentage of the GDP dedicated to defence spending, because it would be the subject of the talks in NATO, but higher spending is inevitable. 2% is not enough.

The days of economic prosperity without military power are over. My serious concern is this: are we ready to adjust our economy? The world is changing, and so far, I have not noticed any significant shift in the Europe scores. Member States will need to invest more in European defence, more in cybersecurity, and reform our military for 21st鈥慶entury combat. This would send a strong signal to both sides of the Atlantic, to friends as well as adversaries. Europe's wealth has a military dimension.

听听Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy (Renew). 鈥� Madam President, colleagues, we Europeans are extremely fortunate because Europe is by far the best place to live in the entire world. Nowhere on our planet do people find our incredibly high level of welfare, well-being, freedom and democracy. This is all thanks to the European integration after the Second World War. But we must not be naive, our self-created paradise on this planet is under threat, militarily, economically, politically and morally. And there's just one right answer to these multiple threats: unite, unite, unite! A united European defence, a united economic policy in line with Draghi's recommendations, a united foreign policy without vetoes, and a united response to the immoral politics of Donald Trump.

听听脰zlem Demirel (The Left). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin! Ja, die Menschen sind verunsichert听鈥� sie haben Angst vor Krieg und Autoritarismus. Sie w眉nschen sich Freiheit und Sicherheit. Die Gefahr geht aber nicht lediglich von ausl盲ndischen Oligarchen wie Musk oder von Russland aus, sondern auch von hiesigen Oligarchen, die immer mehr Verm枚gen anh盲ufen und damit Macht konzentrieren und aktuell auch nach Kriegst眉chtigkeit schreien.

Aktuell 眉berschlagen sich die Forderungen: Trump fordert 5听Prozent Aufr眉stung mit der AfD zusammen, das hei脽t die H盲lfte des bundesdeutschen Haushaltes. Die Gr眉nen fordern 150听Milliarden听Euro f眉r Kriegsger盲t, und der NATO-Generalsekret盲r sagt: Daf眉r braucht es K眉rzungen bei der Rente und bei Sozialleistungen.

Die Wahrheit ist aber: Massive Aufr眉stung hat nie einen Krieg verhindert. Militarismus f眉hrt nicht zur Sicherheit, sondern zu einem Abbau der demokratischen Rechte, st盲rkt Autorit盲re und die Kriegsbereitschaft. Wir brauchen Sicherheit und Freiheit听鈥� das geht in sozialer Sicherheit, das geht mit einer aktiven Friedenspolitik. Wir brauchen keine Barbarei.

听听Thomas Geisel (NI). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, Frau Kommissarin, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! 鈥瀂eit, unsere Verteidigung zu st盲rken鈥�, lautet das Thema dieser Debatte. Und Aufr眉stung scheint in der Tat听the Flavour of the Day zu sein听鈥� 500听Milliarden Euro m枚chte Herr Kubilius in die gemeinsame Verteidigung stecken, und innerhalb der NATO ist ein regelrechter 脺berbietungswettbewerb im Gange, ganz nach dem Motto: Darf's noch etwas mehr sein?

Fr眉her war man mal zufrieden mit 2听Prozent. Herr Habeck von den deutschen Gr眉nen fordert mittlerweile 3,5听Prozent, und Herr Trump hat nun die Messlatte auf 5听Prozent des Bruttoinlandsprodukts gelegt听鈥� auch 眉brigens unter dem Jubel der selbsternannten Friedenspartei AfD. 5听Prozent w眉rde f眉r die meisten Mitgliedstaaten bedeuten, dass ungef盲hr die H盲lfte des Haushalts f眉r Waffen ausgegeben w眉rde听鈥� das ist offensichtlich 眉bergeschnappt.

Aber vielleicht sollte uns diese absurde Diskussion Anlass geben, einmal zu fragen, worin wirklich die St盲rke Europas liegt. Ich darf daran erinnern: Der Eiserne Vorhang ist nicht gefallen, weil der Westen der Sowjetunion milit盲risch 眉berlegen war, er ist gefallen, weil unser Gesellschaftsmodell attraktiver und erfolgreicher war. Und darauf sollte sich Europa konzentrieren. Wir wollen kein waffenstrotzendes Milit盲rb眉ndnis sein, sondern ein gemeinsames Projekt f眉r Frieden, Freiheit und Wohlstand.

听听Pekka Toveri (PPE). 鈥� Madam President, dear colleagues, we are living in dangerous times where dictatorships like Russia challenge our democracy, not only with military means but also with hybrid warfare. Because of that, we need to understand that we need both security and defence. Investing billions in defence is useless if the dictatorships break us from the inside by breaking our unity and democracy with information operations and by destroying our civilian infrastructure with sabotage and cyber attacks.

As an old soldier, I know how important military defence is. I also know that building military defence is relatively easy. We all have defence forces. It is easy to build them so that they are bigger and stronger. But building security against hybrid warfare and improving the resilience of our civilian society is much more demanding. Nevertheless, we shouldn't avoid doing so just because it will be difficult and expensive.

Locking the front door does not help if the back door is open. We need balanced, 360鈥慸egree security and defence to secure the whole EU, our democracy, our societies and citizens. And the earlier we start, with adequate resources, the better.

听听Ana Catarina Mendes (S&D). 鈥� Senhora Presidente, Caros Colegas, de facto, a prioridade nos dias que correm 茅 a seguran莽a na Europa. Foi assim o debate com a Comiss茫o e o Conselho, esta manh茫, foi assim o debate com a Presid锚ncia polaca e, sim, 茅 uma prioridade.

Mas julgo que a primeira palavra 茅: concentremo-nos nos esfor莽os que a Uni茫o Europeia tem de fazer para se tornar mais aut贸noma, mais forte e mais capaz de responder aos desafios que a铆 est茫o. E se n贸s estamos preocupados, no S&D, com a seguran莽a, n茫o quero deixar de ser muito clara: o aumento do investimento em defesa n茫o pode ser feito 脿 custa de investimentos que asseguram a seguran莽a de todos, garantida pelas pol铆ticas e pelos fundos de coes茫o.

Garantir a seguran莽a de todos implica a prote莽茫o contra as atividades criminosas. E combater as atividades criminosas implica combater a pobreza, a exclus茫o social e todas as formas de discrimina莽茫o, atrav茅s de uma pol铆tica de coes茫o forte e solid谩ria, como diz o artigo 3.潞 do nosso Tratado.

E, por isso, devemos tamb茅m refor莽ar o investimento em defesa, sem nenhuma d煤vida, mas um investimento que deve ser coordenado ao n铆vel europeu, gerando poupan莽as significativas no setor, para maximizar as capacidades militares da Europa.

Precisamos de um maior e mais eficiente investimento em defesa para, tamb茅m, garantir um investimento na seguran莽a de todos os cidad茫os.

听听Elena Donazzan (ECR). 鈥� Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, il rafforzamento della nostra difesa e sicurezza passa necessariamente tramite il rafforzamento della nostra industria della difesa e sicurezza e una scelta consapevole, culturale e politica.

Per anni 猫 stato un tab霉 parlare di investimenti in difesa, era impensabile per ogni tipo di discorso disallineato al Green Deal. Oggi, a causa della situazione geopolitica, il paradigma 猫 cambiato, ma ci troviamo a rincorrere anni di sottoinvestimenti nella difesa, di diminuzione delle nostre forze militari, anche in termini di et脿, e di debolezza della popolazione civile come consapevolezza.

Per questo, l'Europa non pu貌 ritardare ancora e deve subito investire in difesa: si tratta di investimenti che generano benessere. Come dice sempre il ministro della Difesa italiano, ogni euro investito in difesa genera due euro addizionali e per ogni persona occupata nelle grandi imprese ve ne sono tre nel settore delle piccole e medie imprese.

Ci vogliono risorse e vanno tolte dal patto di stabilit脿, come anche gi脿 detto dal Commissario Kubilius. Ecco, investire in difesa travalica il settore militare ed entra pienamente nel settore civile.

听听Irena Joveva (Renew). 鈥� Gospa predsednica! Kolegice in kolegi! Odli膷no je, da imamo to razpravo o zdru啪itvi Evrope proti akterjem sovra啪nim do Unije. Zdi se, da teh zadnje 膷ase res ne manjka. Vselej trdim, da smo mo膷ni in neodvisni lahko samo, 膷e smo zdru啪eni in 膷e delujemo kot eno.

Ampak obramba Evropske unije ne pomeni samo pove膷anja izdatkov za vojsko. Do neke mere seveda razumem potrebo po teh zmogljivostih, navsezadnje si 啪elim neodvisno Unijo tudi na tem podro膷ju, ampak zadnje 膷ase se prav tako zdi, da je to edino, o 膷emer govorimo.

O skupnem dolgu govorimo samo 拧e v kontekstu obrambe. Kaj pa potrebne investicije v infrastrukturo, energetsko neodvisnost, pripravo ukrepov na spreminjajo膷e podnebje, pove膷anje konkuren膷nosti, izbolj拧anje pogojev 啪ivljenja za ljudi.

Zato v lu膷i vsega, kar se dogaja po svetu, dajmo se kon膷no poenotiti in sprejeti odlo膷ne ukrepe, o katerih razpravljamo 啪e desetletja. Dovolj je narcisizma, majhnih razlik, dovolj izmotavanj in dovolj ideologije. In pri tem zadnje mislim predvsem na tiste glasne samooklicane patriote, ki bi zaradi ideologije raje zastopali interese drugih kot Evropske unije. Vrhunski nacionalisti, res!

听听Juan Ignacio Zoido 脕lvarez (PPE). 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, se帽ora comisaria, se帽or铆as, la semana pasada el secretario general de la OTAN dijo que tenemos tres听opciones en materia de defensa: invertir m谩s, mudarnos a Nueva Zelanda o aprender ruso. Como Nueva Zelanda est谩 a 19听000听kil贸metros y el ruso tiene seis听declinaciones y un alfabeto distinto, convendr谩n conmigo, se帽or铆as, en que lo m谩s razonable es invertir m谩s en defensa, especialmente cuando el Servicio Federal de Inteligencia de Alemania est谩 alertando de que Rusia estar谩 preparada para atacar a la OTAN de aqu铆 a 2030. Si alguien no ve la amenaza es porque prefiere vivir ciego.

La Uni贸n Europea tiene la hoja de ruta clara: invertir m谩s, invertir mejor y en clave europea. Se帽or铆as, tenemos poco tiempo para salvar un d茅ficit de inversiones milmillonarias y ya conocemos las intenciones de Trump con la OTAN. Por tanto, los europeos tenemos que mostrar responsabilidad y fiabilidad ante nuestros socios transatl谩nticos en todas las facetas, tambi茅n en la de defensa.

听听Ivars Ijabs (Renew). 鈥� Madam President, Madam Commissioner, as already noted this morning by Prime Minister Tusk, we should concentrate today not on guessing what the next steps of the new American administration could be, but what we ourselves can do in order to bolster our own safety and security.

But let me ask you, what is the strength of the EU? It is not about commanding armies. We have NATO. Therefore it is our economic and technological might, our industry and our single market. And let's be clear, we are not exploiting it to bolster our security and defence to the full extent, because also the legislation is being delayed. In this case, the European defence industrial programme, EDIP, was published already almost a year ago, and the 合法博彩网站 hasn't even properly started to work on it to promote defence and security, the defence industry and our single market in defence, which is really painfully lacking in the EU.

Time is running out, dear colleagues: let's proceed from words to deeds at last. Let's help Ukraine and let's help ourselves.

听听Rapha毛l Glucksmann (S&D). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, chers coll猫gues, Bruno听Kahl, le chef des services secrets allemands, est un homme calme, mesur茅 et prudent. Quand il annonce devant le Bundestag que Poutine pr茅pare une guerre contre un pays membre de l鈥橴nion europ茅enne avant听2029, il faudrait peut-锚tre le prendre au s茅rieux. Or, les dirigeants europ茅ens le font-ils? Prennent-ils au s茅rieux nos services de s茅curit茅? J鈥檈n doute.

Sinon, comment expliquer ce rythme de limace dans la construction de la d茅fense europ茅enne ou dans l鈥檃ide 脿 la r茅sistance ukrainienne? Arr锚tons de tout miser sur un parapluie am茅ricain qui peut se refermer 脿 tout instant. Voulons-nous vraiment faire d茅pendre toute notre s茅curit茅 de Donald Trump ou d鈥橢lon Musk? Non. Alors, il n鈥檡 a plus de temps 脿 perdre pour int茅grer nos industries de d茅fense, investir ensemble, acheter ensemble, d茅velopper des syst猫mes de d茅fense ensemble et innover ensemble, comme nous l鈥檃vons fait face 脿 la pand茅mie. Levons enfin, ensemble, en Europ茅ens, les fonds n茅cessaires, et mutualisons nos commandes comme nos productions!

Le premier devoir d鈥檜n dirigeant politique est d鈥檃ssurer la s茅curit茅 de sa cit茅. Faillir 脿 ce devoir, c鈥檈st plonger dans le n茅ant. Et nous n鈥檃vons simplement pas le droit de faillir.

听听沤eljana Zovko (PPE). 鈥� Madam President, dear Commissioner, even though this year has started with good news, with the fall of the Assad regime in Syria and the Gaza ceasefire and the hostage deal, the news from the Eastern Front are still raising major concerns.

We spent our Christmas holidays overshadowed by heartbreaking stories of terrorist attacks in Germany. Our security forces do not have any holidays, and they are working 24 hours a day to protect us.

If not now, when we will realise that significantly strengthening our defence capabilities is absolutely essential. When we adopted the Strategic Compass in 2022 while facing the Russian aggression against Ukraine, we realised the need to react to this new reality. Likewise, we must today take into account the need to invest in defence and the European pillar of NATO. We must also deepen our defence relationship with key allies such as the UK. This is crucial to address our adversaries that try to challenge our citizens' well-being.

听听Vilija Blinkevi膷i奴t臈 (S&D). 鈥� Gerbiama Pirmininke, komisare, kolegos, investicijos 寞 saugum膮 ir gynyb膮, 寞 gynybos pramon臈s reik拧ming膮 paj臈gum懦 didinim膮 ir investicijos 寞 vis膮 m奴s懦 Europos S膮jung膮, 寞 m奴s懦 啪mones. Tod臈l reikia skubiai didinti tiek valstybi懦 nari懦, tiek ir visos Europos S膮jungos investicijas 寞 gynyb膮 ir 寞 m奴s懦 karinius paj臈gumus. Ir 膷ia mes turime b奴ti kaip niekad vieningi. Did啪iul臈 yra Rusijos agresijos gr臈sm臈. A拧 esu i拧 Lietuvos, i拧 pafront臈s valstyb臈s, ir tod臈l tebesit臋siantis karas Ukrainoje bei globalus geopolitinis nestabilumas jokiu b奴du neleid啪ia mums delsti ir laukti, pavyzd啪iui, naujos finansin臈s perspektyvos, kad 啪enkliai gal臈tume padidinti gynybos finansavimo paj臈gumus. Mes privalome ie拧koti iniciatyv懦 ir lanks膷i懦 finansavimo b奴d懦. Privalome tur臈ti europinius fondus gynybos pramon臈s vystymui, sutelkti Europos investicinio banko finansavim膮, per啪i奴r臈ti fiskalines taisykles, kurios leist懦 valstyb臈ms nar臈ms skirti didesn寞 finansavim膮 gynybai nesilaikant trij懦 procent懦 BVP biud啪eto deficito, nes to reikalauja esama realyb臈.

听听President. 鈥� Because there are so many Members not showing up our system is going a bit wild, so please excuse us for telling you so late!

听听螕蔚维未畏蟼 螕蔚维未畏 (ECR). 鈥� 螝蠀蟻委伪 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 蔚蟺喂尾维位位蔚蟿伪喂 谓伪 蟺蟻慰蠂蠅蟻萎蟽慰蠀渭蔚 蟽蟿畏谓 蔚谓委蟽蠂蠀蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 维渭蠀谓伪蟼 蟿畏蟼 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏蟼, 伪蠁慰蠉 渭蠈谓慰 苇蟿蟽喂 胃伪 伪蟺慰魏蟿萎蟽慰蠀渭蔚 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿喂魏萎 伪蟽蟺委未伪 蔚谓维谓蟿喂伪 蟽蔚 蔚蠂胃蟻喂魏苇蟼 伪蟺蔚喂位苇蟼 魏伪喂 喂蟽蠂蠉 蟽蟿畏 未喂蔚胃谓萎 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏萎 蟽魏畏谓萎. 螌渭蠅蟼 蟿慰 谓伪 渭喂位慰蠉渭蔚 纬喂伪 蔚尉蠅蟿蔚蟻喂魏苇蟼 蔚蠂胃蟻喂魏苇蟼 伪蟺蔚喂位苇蟼, 蟿畏 蟽蟿喂纬渭萎 蟺慰蠀 蔚未维蠁畏 蠂蠋蟻伪蟼 魏蟻维蟿慰蠀蟼 渭苇位慰蠀蟼 蟿畏蟼 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎蟼 螆谓蠅蟽畏蟼 蟿蔚位慰蠉谓 蠀蟺蠈 魏伪蟿慰蠂萎, 蔚委谓伪喂 蟽蠂萎渭伪 慰尉蠉渭蠅蟻慰. 螘谓蠋 蟽蠅蟽蟿维 畏 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 螆谓蠅蟽畏 苇蠂蔚喂 蔚蟺喂尾维位蔚喂 魏蠀蟻蠋蟽蔚喂蟼 蟽蟿畏 巍蠅蟽委伪 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 蔚喂蟽尾慰位萎, 蟽蟿畏蟻委味慰谓蟿伪蟼 渭蔚 魏维胃蔚 蟿蟻蠈蟺慰 蟿畏谓 螣蠀魏蟻伪谓委伪, 未蔚谓 蟺蟻维蟿蟿蔚喂 蟿慰 委未喂慰 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 螝蠀蟺蟻喂伪魏萎 螖畏渭慰魏蟻伪蟿委伪. 螒蟺慰蟿蔚位蔚委 蟺蟻蠈魏位畏蟽畏 纬喂伪 蠂喂位喂维未蔚蟼 魏蠉蟺蟻喂慰蠀蟼 魏伪喂 维位位慰蠀蟼 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪委慰蠀蟼 蟺慰位委蟿蔚蟼 畏 伪谓伪魏慰委谓蠅蟽畏 蔚魏 渭苇蟻慰蠀蟼 蟿畏蟼 魏蠀蟻委伪蟼 Ursula von der Leyen 纬喂伪 蔚蟺喂蟺位苇慰谓 蟽蟿萎蟻喂尉畏 蟿畏蟼 韦慰蠀蟻魏委伪蟼 渭蔚 苇谓伪 未喂蟽蔚魏伪蟿慰渭渭蠉蟻喂慰. 螚 螝蠉蟺蟻慰蟼 蠂蟻蔚喂维味蔚蟿伪喂 蟿畏 尾慰萎胃蔚喂维 蟽伪蟼 纬喂伪 谓伪 伪蟺蔚位蔚蠀胃蔚蟻蠅胃蔚委 伪蟺蠈 蟿畏 渭蟺蠈蟿伪 蟿慰蠀 蟿慰蠉蟻魏慰蠀 尾维蟻尾伪蟻慰蠀 蔚喂蟽尾慰位苇伪 魏伪喂 魏伪蟿伪魏蟿畏蟿萎. 螁蟻伪, 伪谓蟿委 谓伪 魏伪位慰蟺喂维谓蔚蟿蔚 蟿畏谓 螁纬魏蠀蟻伪 蔚谓喂蟽蠂蠉慰谓蟿伪蟼 慰喂魏慰谓慰渭喂魏维 魏伪喂 蟽蟿蟻伪蟿喂蠅蟿喂魏维, 蔚委谓伪喂 魏伪喂蟻蠈蟼 畏 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏 谓伪 蟽蠀蟽蟿蟻伪蟿蔚蠀胃蔚委 蟽蟿慰 蟺位蔚蠀蟻蠈 蟿畏蟼 螝蠀蟺蟻喂伪魏萎蟼 螖畏渭慰魏蟻伪蟿委伪蟼, 蔚蟺喂尾维位位慰谓蟿伪蟼 魏蠀蟻蠋蟽蔚喂蟼 魏伪喂 蔚渭蟺维蟻纬魏慰 蟺蠋位畏蟽畏蟼 蠈蟺位蠅谓 蟽蟿畏谓 韦慰蠀蟻魏委伪. 螚 螝蠉蟺蟻慰蟼 纬蔚蠅蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏维 鈥斘毕� 蟿慰 魏伪蟿伪谓慰萎蟽慰蠀谓 蠈位慰喂鈥� 蔚委谓伪喂 蟿慰 蟺蟻慰蟺蠉蟻纬喂慰 蟿畏蟼 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏蟼 伪蟺苇谓伪谓蟿喂 蟽蔚 蟺蟻慰魏位萎蟽蔚喂蟼 蠈蟺蠅蟼 畏 蟿蟻慰渭慰魏蟻伪蟿委伪 蟽蟿畏 螠苇蟽畏 螒谓伪蟿慰位萎, 畏 蟺伪蟻维谓慰渭畏 渭蔚蟿伪谓维蟽蟿蔚蠀蟽畏 魏伪喂 慰 蔚谓蔚蟻纬蔚喂伪魏蠈蟼 蟺蠀位蠋谓伪蟼 蟿畏蟼 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏蟼.

听听Morten L酶kkegaard (Renew). 鈥� Fru formand! Europa st氓r midt i en ny form for krig. Hybridkrigen udfordrer b氓de vores sikkerhed og selve fundamentet for vores demokrati. Det handler selvf酶lgelig om mis- og desinformation p氓 nettet med det ene form氓l at undergrave vores tillid til hinanden. Og s氓 er der angrebene p氓 vores kritiske infrastruktur. Fra Danmark har vi set med bekymring p氓 angrebet p氓 kabler i 脴sters酶en. Europ忙iske borgere og virksomheder lever i en ny verden, hvor cyberangreb er blevet hverdagskost. Det sker her og nu. Og konsekvenserne, ja, de er dybt alvorlige. Jeg har derfor foresl氓et oprettelse af en europ忙isk cyberbrigade, et f忙lles europ忙isk v忙rn, der kan opdage, h氓ndtere og ikke mindst forebygge cyberangreb. Samtidig skal vi selvf酶lgelig beskytte vores kritiske infrastruktur. Vi har brug for t忙ttere overv氓gning, f忙lles 酶velser og investeringer i robuste systemer, der kan forudse fremtidige angreb. For at sige det lige ud: Hybridkrig kr忙ver hybrid respons. Europa skal kunne tackle hybridkrigen sammen.

听听Massimiliano Salini (PPE). 鈥� Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, abbiamo una discussione all'interno del Parlamento che ancora una volta torna sul concetto di sicurezza e di difesa e corre molti dei rischi che anche in passato ha gi脿 corso.

Il primo strumento che noi abbiamo per garantire la sicurezza dell'Unione europea 猫 l'unit脿 tra i paesi membri, magari riducendo, se possibile, l'ipocrisia del dibattito politico.

Abbiamo molto spesso confuso il concetto di pace, riducendolo a una versione molto scadente e moderna di appeasement, ma dall'altro lato abbiamo celebrato la sicurezza, magari celebrando anche una cultura della divisione tra gli Stati nazionali.

Per avere sicurezza ci vuole unit脿 e per avere unit脿 bisogna difendersi anche dalle minacce interne, che tante volte rendono disarmonico il nostro dibattito e la cultura della responsabilit脿: ad esempio, evitando di puntare il dito su quelli che sono i nostri possibili amici esterni.

Quel che sta accadendo negli Stati Uniti ci costringe non tanto a dare lezioni di democrazia, quanto a capire chi sono i nostri amici, a sedersi al tavolo per costruire l'unit脿 interna dell'Unione e dell'Occidente intero.

听听Dan Barna (Renew). 鈥� Doamn膬 pre葯edint膬, c芒nd Rusia a 卯ncercat s膬 distrug膬 cablurile submarine de comunica葲ii din Marea Baltic膬, NATO a r膬spuns trimi葲芒nd nave 葯i aeronave s膬 apere infrastructura critic膬. Este un r膬spuns firesc 葯i binevenit, dar Europa a trecut de mult de momentul 卯n care poate doar s膬 r膬spund膬 葯i trebuie s膬 treac膬 la etapa de prevenire a atacurilor 葯i a provoc膬rilor de la actorii ostili. Este momentul 卯n care securitatea noastr膬 s膬 fie o prioritate asumat膬.

S膬 nu uit膬m c膬 葯i ordinea intern膬 joac膬 un rol crucial 卯n acest proces. Respectarea legilor 葯i a deciziilor, de pild膬, sanc葲iunile impuse Rusiei, este esen葲ial膬 葯i pentru securitatea noastr膬 european膬. Spre exemplu, exporturile c膬tre state despre care exist膬 dovezi c膬 v芒nd acele bunuri mai departe Rusiei devin o amenin葲are de securitate 葯i trebuie oprite. Ap膬rarea fa葲膬 de actorii externi nu poate func葲iona f膬r膬 domnia legii 卯n interiorul Uniunii Europene, aici, la noi acas膬.

听听Davor Ivo Stier (PPE). 鈥� Po拧tovana predsjedavaju膰a, povjerenice, 啪ivimo u svijetu u kojem se puno manje ra膷una vodi o me膽unarodnom pravu, o vrijednostima, a puno vi拧e o odnosu snaga glavnih geopoliti膷kih 膷imbenika. Revizionisti膷ke sile zagovaraju multipolarni poredak kako bi svaka u svom dijelu svijeta mogla uspostaviti svoju hegemoniju. To jasno vidimo u konceptu 鈥瀝uskoga svijeta鈥�. I te revizionisti膷ke sile se sve vi拧e udru啪uju u konfrontaciji protiv onoga 拧to nazivaju dominacijom zapada. U toj konfrontaciji napadaju i same osnove zapadne demokracije. Evo, u tom kontekstu, europski narodi 膰e svoju slobodu i demokraciju sa膷uvati ne fragmentacijom Europske unije, ve膰 ve膰om integracijom, kao 拧to je danas to spomenuo i Donald Tusk. To zna膷i i ve膰i pragmatizam u energetskoj i industrijskoj politici, ali to zna膷i i vi拧e izdvajanja za obranu ne kako bi bili protiv ameri膷kih saveznika, nego kako bi s njima i s ostalim zapadnim demokracijama obranili vrijednosti i Europe i slobodnog svijeta.

听听Die Pr盲sidentin. 鈥� Vielen Dank an alle, die jetzt im Raum waren. Es zeigt sich, dass es sich doch lohnt, die ganze Debatte 眉ber im Raum zu sein. Dann ist man auch da, wenn das System mal versagt.

听听Anna-Maja Henriksson (Renew). 鈥� Arvoisa puhemies, komissaari, on t盲ysin selv盲盲, ett盲 Euroopan on otettava enemm盲n vastuuta omasta puolustuksestaan. Puolustusteollisuutta on vahvistettava ja luotava toimivat puolustussis盲markkinat, ja Ukrainaa on tietenkin tuettava. On kyse niin Ukrainan kuin koko Euroopan tulevaisuudesta.

Maailmanpoliittinen tilanne tietenkin huolestuttaa monia, mutta me tulemme p盲rj盲盲m盲盲n p盲盲tt盲v盲isell盲 toiminnalla ja yhteisty枚ll盲 EU:n, Naton ja j盲senvaltioidemme v盲lill盲. Me olemme vahvoja. Meid盲n t盲ytyy vain nyt yhdess盲 ja m盲盲r盲tietoisesti menn盲 eteenp盲in.

Mik盲 on meid盲n t盲rkein teht盲v盲mme t盲盲ll盲 Euroopan parlamentissa? Juuri nyt se t盲rkein teht盲v盲 on pit盲盲 yht盲. Juuri nyt se t盲rkein teht盲v盲 on puolustaa arvojamme: demokratiaa, oikeusvaltiota ja meid盲n ihmisoikeuksiamme. Ja t盲ss盲 talossa me keskiryhm盲ss盲 teemme juuri sit盲. Ja sit盲 meid盲n pit盲盲 tehd盲 t盲st盲 eteenkinp盲in kaikkien.

Vi ska alla jobba f枚r att st盲rka Europas f枚rsvar.

听听Mika Aaltola (PPE). 鈥� Madam President, the enemies are at our gates, and even inside. They are using different weapons and tactics to defeat and divide us. We must remember Winston Churchill's words at the ruins of the Second World War. He envisioned European integration as a geopolitical necessity to deter the Soviet Union and contain its ideology. As a geopolitical actor, we must invest in the European defence and security industries. This would complement NATO's efforts to fulfil its European mission.

Some are asking where the financial resources come from. I will ask the counter鈥憅uestion: where did the money disappear to when we were cashing in on the so-called peace dividend? In the economic stagnation and political decline into lazy ideas of peace through gas.

听听H茅lder Sousa Silva (PPE). 鈥� Senhora Presidente, Senhor Ministro, Senhora Comiss谩ria, considero que a hora dos discursos inflamados j谩 passou. Precisamos de passar 脿 a莽茫o. Precisamos de fazer acontecer.

Sim, a defesa 茅 uma responsabilidade primordial dos Estados-Membros. E, sim, enquanto eurodeputados, temos a responsabilidade de ser voz ativa na justifica莽茫o do aumento do investimento da Uni茫o na defesa, quer estejamos no norte, no centro ou no sul da Europa.

Mas a Uni茫o Europeia tem tamb茅m um papel crucial: ser o motor da mudan莽a. Isso significa compras conjuntas de material militar, garantindo uma coordena莽茫o eficaz e uma normaliza莽茫o dos equipamentos. Significa termos a coragem e a vis茫o de concretizar o cluster europeu das ind煤strias de defesa, garantindo assim o respetivo mercado 煤nico ou mesmo avan莽ar com os defence bonds.

N茫o h谩 tempo a perder. Fa莽amos da defesa europeia uma verdadeira prioridade de todos n贸s.

听听Isabel Wiseler-Lima (PPE). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, comme l鈥檃 dit ce matin Donald听Tusk au nom de la pr茅sidence polonaise, il est temps d鈥檃gir. Notre s茅curit茅 et notre d茅fense sont au centre de toutes les priorit茅s. L鈥檃utonomie strat茅gique de l鈥橴nion est plus n茅cessaire que jamais, pour nous prot茅ger et pour combattre les menaces militaires ou hybrides, les cyberattaques, l鈥檌nstrumentalisation des migrants et la d茅sinformation, entre autres.

Les guerres hybrides et les ing茅rences 茅trang猫res sont des tentatives de d茅stabilisation de nos d茅mocraties, que nous devons combattre avec d茅termination. Il est de notre devoir de nous prot茅ger. Notre s茅curit茅 est entre nos mains et non entre celles d鈥檃cteurs ext茅rieurs, qu鈥檌ls soient alli茅s ou ennemis. Et cela passe par des investissements tr猫s cons茅quents dans nos capacit茅s de d茅fense, dans nos forces arm茅es, dans nos infrastructures de cybers茅curit茅, dans le d茅veloppement de nouvelles technologies. Sans fonds, tout cela ne sera que de vaines paroles.

Il faut que nous nous donnions les moyens financiers d鈥檃voir entre nos mains notre destin. 脌 nous d鈥檃voir le courage et la d茅termination d鈥櫭猼re unis et de garder 脿 l鈥檈sprit le poids des enjeux: notre s茅curit茅, la d茅mocratie, la libert茅.

听听Reinier Van Lanschot (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Madam President, 'penny-wise, pound-foolish' 鈥� that sums up the impact of the defence budget cuts in the first 20 years of this century. So it's good that the Commissioner for Defence has proposed to start with a big bang of EUR听100听billion as a European investment plan, because the threats are banging on our door so loudly that everybody seems to agree that we need to invest. I agree as well, but unfortunately, the government of my home country, the Netherlands, is still stuck in a 'penny-wise, pound-foolish' mindset.

On Monday 3 February, the Heads of State will meet for a European Council meeting dedicated to defence. And my plea here today is that the Dutch Government uses that moment to stop being foolish and change their position on Eurobonds: be wise or we'll pay a much higher price.

听听Dubravka 艩uica, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam听President, honourable Members, first of all, I would like to thank Ms Strack鈥慫immerman in particular for initiating this debate. She hasn't heard me, but okay.

The debate illustrates the importance of continuously strengthening our security and defence posture. This means with the financial resources, military equipment, but more importantly, with the strong will and commitment, not only in response to Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine, but also to other threats: emerging conflicts around the globe and challenges posed to our resilience. For example, the European Union needs to act urgently to ensure guaranteed access in an unrestricted manner without third鈥憄arty dependencies when it comes to satellite connectivity. The IRIS2 space flagship programme will fully and concretely address this imperative. We have the capacity to equip our Union with the tools we need. To this end we must remain united, as our unity is what makes us strong.

The white paper on the future of European defence will pave the way for our future actions, and we will have a say on it. The Commission will set the ambition high, also with regard to tackling cyberattacks and hybrid attacks. But it will be in the hands of Member States to implement it. Here I am referring to the Council.

On the role of the European 合法博彩网站, the European 合法博彩网站 is an important stakeholder in the implementation of defence ambitions as co鈥憀egislator of the European Union defence programmes 鈥� the European Defence Fund, ASAP for ammunition, and now EDIP. As co鈥慸ecider of the next EU budget, the European 合法博彩网站 has a significant impact on our level of ambitions at the European level, and in particular in ensuring an ambitious defence budget in the next MFF.

Once again, Ms Strack鈥慫immerman, because you didn't hear it at the beginning, I want to thank you in particular for initiating this debate. We are looking forward to this 合法博彩网站, relying on you, but also to the Member States.

PRE葮EDIN葰IA: VICTOR NEGRESCU
痴颈肠别辫谤别葯别诲颈苍迟别

听听Adam Sz艂apka, President-in-Office of the Council. 鈥� Mr President, Honourable Members, Commissioner, thank you very much for bringing this debate. It's exactly about the priorities we set during the Polish Presidency. The debate today illustrates the importance of continuously strengthening our security and defence. We need the financial resources and military equipment, but more important is a strong will and commitment, not only in response to Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine, but also to other threats, challenges and emerging conflicts around the globe. Our unity is what makes us strong. Thank you very much.

听听President. 鈥� The debate is closed.

听听笔谤别艧别诲颈苍迟别. 鈥� Urm膬torul punct de pe ordinea de zi este declara葲ia Comisiei, 鈥濧bordarea provoc膬rilor demografice cu care se confrunt膬 UE: pa葯i 卯n direc葲ia punerii 卯n aplicare a Setului de instrumente privind demografia 2023鈥� [], 葯i 卯ncepem printr-o interven葲ie ini葲ial膬 din partea Comisiei Europene, doamna comisar膬 艩uica.

听听Dubravka 艩uica, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Mr President, Presidency of the Council, honourable Members, I am happy to have the opportunity today to discuss with you one of the most prominent challenges for our societies, demographic change, and to outline where we are with the implementation of the Demography Toolbox.

It is very good that we are having this debate here in this House within the first 100听days of this Commission. In fact, as all of you know, people across Europe live longer, healthier lives and this, for a start, is a very positive development with a lot of opportunities. Just think of the older generation who now have more time with their grandchildren, or who may be able to be in the labour market longer if they wish.

However, a working-age population in decline comes with increased pressure on labour markets, on public budgets, Member States' social welfare and pension systems and our economic productivity. In a nutshell, demographic change affects Europe's competitiveness. It's all about competitiveness, as you know, it's not about birth rates, it's not about fertility rates, although this is also important, but it's Member States' competence. So we don't interfere in the Member States' competence but according to the Treaty we can interfere in this and this is something that the Member States asked us to assist and to help with and this is what we have been doing.

This is why the European Council of June 2023 called on the Commission to develop a Demography Toolbox, and we did indeed embark on a multifaceted journey during the previous Commission mandate and I already had the privilege of overseeing the process back then. You know that demography was my first portfolio during the last mandate and this time I have been assigned the portfolio on the Mediterranean but also on demography and this is also important to say, although it's not mentioned in the title.

I'm happy to say that at the General Affairs Council 鈥� GAC 鈥� in December 2023, Member States endorsed the Demography Toolbox and our intention is to support its implementation. The Demography Toolbox provides a comprehensive set of European Union policy tools that are available to support Member States in managing demographic change and its impacts. It builds on best and promising practices from across the Union and complements national-level action, as I already said. It is structured around four pillars.

The first pillar focuses on support for parents. The aim is to better reconcile family aspirations and paid work. This includes ensuring access to quality childcare and a healthy work-life balance. What we also need to consider here is the care strategy, for instance, with regard to the parents of the parents, grandparents or the older population generally. In this context, we should aim to ensure that the many people who currently provide informal, long-term care to family or friends will, in the future, be able to participate fully in the labour market. And this will increase public revenues and employment in the long-term care sector.

The second pillar focuses on supporting and empowering children and younger generations. This includes developing their skills, facilitating their access to the labour market and providing access to affordable housing. Just think of the rent for inner city accommodation. For example, in many places housing is becoming more and more expensive, as all of you know, and this is why we have a dedicated portfolio for affordable housing in this Commission. This was the reason for establishing a new portfolio. The European Child Guarantee aims to counter social exclusion by guaranteeing children in need effective access to key services, such as free early childhood education and care. This is a flagship initiative of the ambitious European Union Strategy on the Rights of the Child, which we endorsed also for the first time during the last mandate.

The third pillar focuses on supporting older generations and sustaining their welfare. In a longevity society it must be possible for older employees to remain active for longer, but it is again Member States' competence so we don't want to interfere, but we can recommend and think about flexible working hours. At the same time, we need to ensure an adequate income in old age and access to high quality and affordable long-term care.

The fourth pillar is about tackling labour shortages through managed legal migration. This is sometimes very sensitive, but this is something which we cannot omit here. While the employment rate in the European Union has reached a new record high more than half of all companies report labour shortages, and the situation is even worse with SMEs, 74听% of which suffer from a lack of skilled workers. While prioritising the activation of our domestic workers and local employment, legal migration from non-EU countries can help fill gaps at all skill levels. Why am I saying this? Because in the first pillar I was talking about parents, about women, about gender, in the second pillar, about youngsters whose diplomas don't match the needs of the labour markets and in the third, there are some older people who would like to work but cannot work because of the limitation of retirement.听So we have enough potential there, but still it's not enough. And we need to talk about legal migration. There are already several European instruments to facilitate the recruitment of qualified workers in the European Union. The aim is to enhance legal pathways for international labour mobility: the revised Blue Card Directive, the Talent Partnerships and the proposal for the set-up of the Talent Pool, on which we hope to progress quickly in the legislative process. The Action Plan on Integration and Inclusion 2021-2027 supports Member States with effective integration of legally residing migrants. It includes actions that aim to improve employment opportunities and recognition of qualifications of migrants, developing inclusive education and training.

Dear Members, I have mentioned just a few examples of the tools that are available to Member States. The Communication is a comprehensive set of policy choices available to Member States. It is my firm belief that in addressing demographic change, gender equality, non-discrimination, fundamental rights, including children's rights, and intergenerational fairness and solidarity should be at the heart of these policy choices. We should also not forget to ensure equal access to education, employment, health and housing for vulnerable groups and give everyone an equal chance to thrive.

The Toolbox recognises the need to take on board the territorial dimension of demographic shifts. I think we all know examples of rural regions that experience the phenomenon of population decline and outward mobility of young people, the so-called brain drain. The country where I come from is no exception. In this regard, the Commission has stepped up efforts to counter the risk of territorial disparities. We want to aim at transforming all EU regions into dynamic, talent-driven locations.

Our communication on harnessing talent in Europe's regions is a contribution to this task. The Talent Booster Mechanism is being fully operationalised. It provides hands-on technical assistance to some of the most affected regions and funding for reforms and innovation, which is already materialising, with projects on the ground in 70 plus regions and cities. Also, regional and urban policy has a strong bearing.

The ninth Cohesion Report, published in March last year, provides insights on how cohesion policies can help Member States address demographic change. It is very well possible, for example, to develop a lively research and innovation environment to secure a functioning long-term infrastructure of valuable intergenerational projects also outside urban centres.

When we come to the implementation, let me also refer to my mission letter for this term. Steering the implementation of the Demography Toolbox is one of my main tasks linked to demography during this Commission's mandate. We have already made some progress and I thank you for the numerous contributions from this House but there is still work to be done. Several actions of the Toolbox Communication are ongoing or planned for the near future. To mention just a few: first and foremost, we are embarking on a Union of Skills. This is a priority for this Commission. I already mentioned this this morning when we talked about competitiveness and Council conclusions. The idea is that an older workforce would need considerably more upskilling to support technological change, decarbonisation and digitalisation.

I mentioned lifelong learning this morning. Central to this will be, first, embedding lifelong learning into education and careers, and second, supporting the training and career prospects of teachers. The mid-term review of cohesion policy programmes, due this year, provides an excellent opportunity to reassess the situation of regions facing demographic challenges. The allocation of cohesion policy funds can be adapted to demographic needs where necessary, and this is what we are doing. There will be a doubling of European Union support for housing. This is very important to mention, just to know that cohesion policy will be a little bit different.

Further, the Joint Research Centre has started the transformation process of the Atlas of Demography, which is an online platform that shares research and data on the effects of population change on European Union policies.

The review of the Work-Life Balance Directive in 2027 will give an opportunity to assess whether the rules still fit the evolving working practices. It is important for our societies that we foster the reconciliation of work and care responsibilities for both working women and men with care responsibilities. In addition, I think we should reflect on other labour market reforms meant to tackle longevity, such as the possibility to have flexible retirement paths. To conclude, demography is a horizontal issue, as all of you know, and this is why the work of mainstreaming demographic concerns in relevant policy proposals at the level of the European Union, and their impact assessment is ongoing.

I have also been tasked with ensuring that the European Union facilitates Member States' efforts to address their demographic challenges. This will require regular dialogue and exchange at all levels. Our discussion today is a very good and excellent contribution, a valuable contribution to this task. What we need is a whole government approach involving all actors in the economy and society, in a democratic and inclusive manner. Tackled in this way, demographic change can be managed to strengthen Europe's resilience overall. Just to let you know that the Spanish Presidency conclusions recommended that Member States establish demography ministers or ministers at their level and this is what we are aiming for. At the moment, there are only three Member States that have these demography ministers but I think 鈥� and this is a recommendation of course and it depends on the political situation and on coalitions 鈥� this is something which is good. Only Italy, Greece and the country I know best have these ministers.

In this spirit, I look forward to listening to your fruitful exchange and I thank you very much. I know that I exceeded the time, but this was necessary. Later on, I'll give my concluding remarks.

听听Dennis Radtke, im Namen der PPE-Fraktion. 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, liebe Frau Kommissarin, liebe Dubravka, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Ich m枚chte mich zun盲chst einmal ganz herzlich bei der Europ盲ischen Kommission f眉r die Initiative bedanken, und ich bin mir sicher, hier wird noch der eine oder andere Redner ans Pult treten und sagen: 鈥濵it was besch盲ftigen sie sich da schon wieder? Das ist doch eigentlich alles Kompetenz der Mitgliedstaaten.鈥� Aber ich finde听鈥� die Kommissarin hat zu Recht darauf hingewiesen听鈥�, bei aller Kompetenz, die nat眉rlich bei den Mitgliedstaaten liegt, gibt es horizontale Herausforderungen. Und vor allen Dingen d眉rfen wir nicht vergessen: Gerade mit Blick auf die l盲ndlichen Regionen haben wir Ph盲nomene, die finden in Deutschland genauso statt, wie sie in Rum盲nien oder Bulgarien stattfinden.

Und dass wir sozusagen mit der Entv枚lkerung von ganzen Landesteilen in den Mitgliedstaaten konfrontiert sind, das ist schon auch eine Frage, mit der sich die Europ盲ische Union besch盲ftigen muss. Wie k枚nnen wir eigentlich lokale, regionale und nationale Anstrengungen an diesem Punkt einfach auch zusammenf眉hren? Denn interessanterweise war in den letzten Monaten auch bei allen Unternehmensbesuchen, wo es nat眉rlich um die aktuellen Schwierigkeiten geht听鈥� wirtschaftlich schwierige Lage, hohe Energiekosten听鈥�, trotzdem bei fast jedem Unternehmensbesuch das Thema Fachkr盲ftemangel und Arbeitskr盲ftemangel ein Thema, wo mir die Inhaber, die Manager immer wieder gesagt haben: 鈥濨ei allen Problemen听鈥� wir brauchen Leute鈥�.

Und vor allen Dingen auch mit Blick auf die n盲chsten f眉nf bis zehn Jahre: Wenn wir uns die Alterspyramide in unserer Belegschaft anschauen, wo sollen wir die Leute herholen? Bringt uns Leute! Das ist immer wieder ein Thema, das auftaucht. Und deswegen bin ich auch der Kommissarin sehr dankbar, dass sie in diesem Zusammenhang auch noch einmal dar眉ber gesprochen hat: Wie k枚nnen wir auch legale Migration in unsere Arbeitsm盲rkte organisieren? F眉r mich ein ganz zentraler Punkt. An vielen Stellen in der aufgeheizten Debatte wird mittlerweile Flucht, Migration, EU-Binnenmigration听鈥� alles听鈥� in einen Topf geworfen, aber wir werden diese Probleme nur in den Griff bekommen, wenn wir die Kraft zur Differenzierung haben und da auch f眉r legale Wege sorgen, um diese Probleme klar zu adressieren.

听听Marc Angel, on behalf of the S&D Group. 鈥� Mr President, dear Commissioner, dear colleagues, the demographic challenges Europe is facing are among the main threats to our Union's competitiveness. The European Union and the Member States need to create an environment that supports the life choices of our citizens, and we must help them to fulfil their aspirations and to reconcile private and professional lives by ensuring access to quality childcare, and particularly in the light of the upcoming revision of the Work Life Balance Directive in 2027.

Labour shortages and qualified labour and less-qualified labour shortages and working age population in decline poses really a great risk on many levels. But if we tackle it in the proper way. I think demographic trends can strengthen Europe's resilience, and this can only be achieved if cohesive policies focus on gender equality, intergenerational fairness, digital and green transition, managing legal migration, and if they involve remote and rural regions that too often are left behind.

Promoting the EU's access to quality jobs, affordable housing and decent living standards is also crucial. By giving young people access to stable housing, we empower them to build their future and address the great challenges of our time.

And let me just remind you of Mr Letta's report: the fourth freedom, the freedom to stay. This is very important for the rural and the remote regions, and we must invest in these regions.

听听P谩l Szekeres, a PfE k茅pvisel艖csoport nev茅ben. 鈥� Tisztelt Eln枚k 脷r! A demogr谩fiai kih铆v谩sokra a t枚bb gyermek sz眉let茅se is j贸 v谩lasz, m铆g a versenyk茅pess茅g fokoz谩s谩ra a term茅kenys茅g, termel茅kenys茅g er艖s铆t茅se.

A csal谩dbar谩t Magyarorsz谩g sok olyan m贸dot v谩lasztott programj谩ban, amely a gyermeket v谩llal贸 csal谩dokat 茅s az 枚n谩ll贸 茅let眉ket kezd艖 fiatalokat t谩mogatja. N茅h谩nyat szeretn茅k elmondani. Munk谩shitelt ad a dolgoz贸 fiataloknak, p茅nzbeni t谩mogat谩st ny煤jt lak谩s c茅l煤 v谩s谩rl谩sra, hitelt枚rleszt茅s茅re vagy b茅rl茅sre, seg铆ti az 谩llami gondoskod谩sb贸l kiker眉l艖 fiatalokat, hogy lak谩shoz jussanak. Alacsonyan tartja a rezsit. Itt gondolok a g谩z 茅s az 谩ram 谩r谩ra. Id茅n megdupl谩zza a korm谩ny a gyermekek ut谩n j谩r贸 ad贸kedvezm茅nyt. 18 茅ves kor alatt ingyenes k枚z茅tkeztet茅st 茅s oktat谩st biztos铆t, 茅s a 25 茅v alattiak szem茅lyij枚vedelemad贸-mentess茅get kapnak.

A demogr谩fiai v谩ltoz谩sok jelent艖s hat谩st gyakorolnak a gazdas谩gunk versenyk茅pess茅g茅re, ez茅rt nagyon fontos a magyar eln枚ks茅g alatt elfogadott Budapesti Nyilatkozat az eur贸pai versenyk茅pess茅gr艖l. A versenyk茅pess茅g alapja a kis- 茅s k枚z茅pv谩llalatok 茅s az innov谩ci贸 t谩mogat谩sa, valamint a befogad贸 munkaer艖piac, ahol a fogyat茅koss谩ggal 茅l艖 szem茅lyek is min艖s茅gi munkahelyen dolgozhatnak.

听听Antonella Sberna, a nome del gruppo ECR. 鈥� Signor Presidente, signora Commissaria, onorevoli colleghi, 猫 il 2050 e l'Europa 猫 un continente di silenzi. Le scuole sono vuote, i parchi deserti e le fabbriche sono ferme. Non abbiamo ascoltato i segnali e non abbiamo agito. E adesso?

Siamo un continente anziano e stanco. Il tasso di natalit脿 猫 crollato sotto 1,4听figli per donna e in alcuni paesi la popolazione 猫 diminuita del 20听%. Per ogni pensionato ci sono solo due lavoratori. Il sistema 猫 al collasso.

Ma questo futuro non 猫 inevitabile. Possiamo fermare questo declino, ovviamente immaginato. Nell'ottobre 2023 la Commissione europea ha indicato la strada presentando lo strumentario demografico, ma 猫 arrivato il momento 鈥� io ritengo 鈥� di osare di pi霉. 脠 il momento di aprire la strada a un family deal europeo che metta al centro le politiche demografiche, un nuovo equilibrio tra attivit脿 professionale e vita familiare, senza tralasciare il sostegno alla longevit脿 鈥� un piano che non sia solo un elenco di misure, ma una vera e propria rivoluzione culturale.

Colleghi, il declino non 猫 un destino scritto. Il family deal europeo 猫 una risposta, un'arma contro l'invecchiamento, contro la stagnazione e contro l'oblio. Non limitiamoci a immaginare un'Europa viva: costruiamola tutti insieme. La storia non aspetter脿, scriviamola per noi e per le generazioni che verranno.

听听Ciaran Mullooly, on behalf of the Renew Group. 鈥� Mr President, Commissioner, declining birth rates and an increasing proportion of elderly citizens in society is now the norm across the European Union. The figures are stark. The EU population is set to peak next year, as you know. We will lose around 30 million people within the next 75 years. As an MEP representing a mainly rural constituency, I'm aware of the major challenges out there. An incredible example for you today, Commissioner, is the village of Moygownagh in rural County Mayo and Ireland.

Writing in the Western People, Liam Heffron highlighted the plight of the Irish town where, on the 24听June听2024, Mitchell's shop, the public house, the post office, the farm supply business and hardware store all failed to open. Moygownagh alone has lost a staggering 90% of its people since 1841, with the tipping point of sustainability now being passed. Like many parts of rural Ireland, North Mayo is being stripped of its population. This is why we must see the full implementation of the EU Demography Toolbox. Measures such as mentioning cohesion funds are important. The long鈥憈erm vision for rural areas must be fully implemented. We in the Committee on Regional Development (REGI) want to get the cohesion funds to do this job. Please help us, Commissioner, to solve the problem.

听听Majdouline Sbai, au nom du groupe Verts/ALE. 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, Madame la Commissaire, comme Emmanuel听Macron, qui parle de r茅armement d茅mographique, vous voulez que les Europ茅ennes fassent plus d鈥檈nfants pour mener une guerre 茅conomique. 脡lever un enfant aujourd鈥檋ui co没te en moyenne 300听000听euros, et, dans beaucoup de pays, travailler et prendre soin de ce merveilleux petit 锚tre est un parcours du combattant, faute de services publics performants, auxquel vous vous attaquez avec l鈥檃ust茅rit茅.

Mais le plus inqui茅tant et d茅cevant dans cette strat茅gie, c鈥檈st que vous ne parlez pas de l鈥檌nfertilit茅. Un couple sur cinq est en parcours PMA. Ces couples souffrent 脿 un moment de leur vie qui ne devrait 锚tre que joie, parce qu鈥檌ls ont 茅t茅 expos茅s aux agrotoxiques, aux perturbateurs endocriniens, aux PFAS. Et que dire des 10听% de听femmes qui sont dans l鈥檈rrance m茅dicale parce qu鈥檈lles sont atteintes d鈥檈ndom茅triose?

Aujourd鈥檋ui, face 脿 elles, votre injonction 脿 faire plus d鈥檈nfants au nom de la comp茅titivit茅 a quelque chose d鈥檌nd茅cent. Face 脿 ce fl茅au de l鈥檌nfertilit茅, quand allez-vous nous faire des propositions? Quand allez-vous agir?

听听Pasquale Tridico, a nome del gruppo The Left. 鈥� Signor Presidente, signora Commissaria, onorevoli colleghi, il calo demografico 猫 un pericolo per il mercato del lavoro e la sostenibilit脿 del welfare.

Tra le sue implicazioni pi霉 preoccupanti c'猫 la sostenibilit脿 del sistema pensionistico: se oggi per ogni pensionato europeo ci sono 2,7听persone in et脿 lavorativa, entro il 2100 questo rapporto scender脿 a听1,5, con una riduzione di 54听milioni di lavoratori.听In Italia la situazione 猫 drammatica: per ogni pensionato abbiamo 1,4听lavoratori.

Per affrontare questo cambiamento e aumentare l'offerta di lavoro, nel breve periodo bisogna ricorrere ai flussi migratori e nel lungo periodo le politiche devono incentivare la natalit脿.

A questo scopo bisogna incrementare i servizi pubblici di cura per l'infanzia e aumentare i tassi di occupazione femminile. Sappiamo infatti che, laddove i tassi di occupazione femminile sono pi霉 alti, i tassi di fecondit脿 sono pi霉 alti.

In Italia abbiamo il pi霉 basso tasso di occupazione femminile dell'UE, il 53听%, e il pi霉 basso tasso di fecondit脿, circa 1,2听bambini per donna. Inoltre, precariet脿 del lavoro e assenza di politiche di conciliazione peggiorano la situazione.

Bisogna introdurre il congedo obbligatorio di paternit脿 e salari adeguati per avere maggiori incentivi verso la natalit脿.

听听Zsuzsanna Borvend茅g, a ESN k茅pvisel艖csoport nev茅ben. 鈥� Tisztelt Eln枚k 脷r! A gyermek 谩ld谩s, az 茅let szent. Az emberi 茅let legf艖bb 茅rtelme a k枚vetkez艖 nemzed茅k felnevel茅se. A fejlett vil谩g megtagadta ezen 艖si igazs谩gokat. A fogyaszt贸i t谩rsadalom a k枚z枚ss茅g j贸l茅te helyett az egy茅n szabads谩g谩t 谩ll铆totta a k枚z茅ppontba, 茅s a gyermek谩ld谩st az 枚nmegval贸s铆t谩s g谩tj谩nak hazudja.

Eur贸pa az 枚nfelsz谩mol谩s 煤tj谩ra l茅pett, amikor a t枚meges migr谩ci贸val pr贸b谩lta megoldani a n茅pesed茅si v谩ls谩got. Ez az elk茅pzel茅s megbukott. A munkaer艖hi谩ny maradt, viszont 煤jabb probl茅m谩k jelentkeztek, 茅s Eur贸pa v茅gvesz茅lybe ker眉lt. A n茅pess茅gcser茅t le kell 谩ll铆tani. Genderpropaganda helyett a hagyom谩nyos csal谩dmodellt kell vonz贸v谩 tenni, amely az egy茅ni boldogs谩g 茅s a t谩rsadalmi stabilit谩s alapja. A h谩zass谩got 茅s a gyermeknevel茅st kell n茅pszer疟s铆teni. V茅deni kell a megfogant 茅leteket. Sz茅gyen, hogy a Bizotts谩g programj谩ban ez nem szerepel.

Tudatos铆tani kell az emberekben, hogy az abortusz nem egy eg茅szs茅g眉gyi k眉ret, hanem az 茅let kiolt谩sa. Eur贸p谩nak csak 煤gy lehet j枚v艖je, 煤gy nyerheti vissza versenyk茅pess茅g茅t, ha 煤jra szent lesz az 茅let 茅s 谩ld谩s az eur贸pai gyermek.

听听President. 鈥� I was informed by my colleagues that points of order are allowed at the end of the presentation. But we take note of your request.

听听Daniel Buda (PPE). 鈥� Domnule pre葯edinte, Europa se afl膬 la o r膬scruce demografic膬. Statisticile vorbesc de la sine. P芒n膬 卯n 2050, aproape 30听% din popula葲ia european膬 va avea peste 65 de ani, iar for葲a de munc膬 se va reduce cu peste 57 de milioane de persoane p芒n膬 卯n 2100. Ponderea popula葲iei Uniunii Europene 卯n totalul popula葲iei globale va sc膬dea de la 6听% la 4听%, reflect芒nd o sc膬dere alarmant膬 a natalit膬葲ii. Zonele rurale resimt cel mai mult acest declin. Depopularea lor aduce riscuri directe pentru securitatea alimentar膬. Trebuie s膬 ac葲ion膬m acum, investind 卯n viitorul tinerilor 葯i cre芒nd condi葲ii pentru ca ace葯tia s膬 r膬m芒n膬 acas膬. Locuin葲ele accesibile, educa葲ia de calitate 葯i locurile de munc膬 bine pl膬tite 鈥� 葯i aici subliniez, locurile de munc膬 bine pl膬tite 鈥� sunt doar c芒teva dintre direc葲iile de ac葲iune.

Schimb膬rile demografice ac葲ioneaz膬 葯i afecteaz膬 diferit regiunile Uniunii Europene. Din Rom芒nia, de exemplu, peste 4,5 milioane de oameni au plecat 卯n afara grani葲elor. De asemenea, 卯n timp ce 卯n sudul Italiei sau al Spaniei casele sunt v芒ndute cu un euro, alte regiuni se confrunt膬 cu o criz膬 acut膬 a locuin葲elor. Iat膬 de ce trebuie s膬 ac葲ion膬m diferen葲iat, adapt芒nd politicile la nevoile locale. Gestionarea inteligent膬 a migra葲iei devine o prioritate. Avem nevoie de for葲膬 de munc膬 calificat膬 pentru asigurarea durabilit膬葲ii economice a Uniunii Europene.

Apreciez publicarea setului de instrumente privind demografia 2023, dar doamn膬 comisar膬, f膬r膬 o finan葲are adecvat膬, nici cele mai bune politici nu vor avea impactul dorit. Fonduri precum Mecanismul de redresare 葯i rezilien葲膬 葯i Fondul social european Plus trebuie s膬 devin膬 pilonii acestui efort. Stima葲i colegi, Europa 卯mb膬tr芒ne葯te. Viitorul nostru nu trebuie s膬 fie 卯ns膬 o povar膬 pentru ceilal葲i.

听听Lina G谩lvez (S&D). 鈥� Se帽or presidente, se帽ora comisaria, Europa vive sin duda un invierno demogr谩fico, pero tambi茅n una utilizaci贸n intencionada de ese invierno demogr谩fico para colar mensajes regresivos, como por ejemplo respecto al papel de las mujeres en nuestra sociedad y en nuestra econom铆a. Lo acabamos de o铆r.

Es como que el invierno demogr谩fico, al final, se convierte en una especie de chantaje para las mujeres en contra de nuestros derechos sexuales y reproductivos, como si nosotras fu茅ramos las responsables de ese declive demogr谩fico. No lo somos.

Tampoco somos responsables de la p茅rdida de competitividad. Hay que apostar por la innovaci贸n y por mejorar la productividad.

Tampoco somos responsables de la falta de sostenibilidad de nuestro modelo social. Lo que hay que hacer es garantizar empleos de calidad y un reparto m谩s equitativo de los beneficios.

Esas medidas, m谩s unos servicios p煤blicos de calidad y una mayor corresponsabilidad, tambi茅n ayudar谩n a las mujeres a tener hijos si es lo que quieren. Esa es la apuesta socialista, como tambi茅n lo es garantizar la dignidad de las personas que dan y reciben cuidados, favoreciendo su autonom铆a. Utilicemos, por tanto, la crisis demogr谩fica para avanzar en igualdad de g茅nero, empleo digno, innovaci贸n, sostenibilidad de los servicios p煤blicos y una mirada m谩s humana e inteligente a la migraci贸n.

(La oradora acepta responder a una pregunta formulada con arreglo al procedimiento de la 芦tarjeta azul禄)

听听Alexander Jungbluth (ESN), Frage nach dem Verfahren der 鈥瀊lauen Karte鈥�. 鈥� Ja, vielen Dank, dass Sie die Frage zulassen. Ich gebe Ihnen in einem Punkt vollkommen recht: Es ist nicht die Schuld der Frauen, dass wir dieses demografische Problem haben, sondern es ist das Problem der Gesellschaft. Wir versetzen Frauen nicht mehr in die Lage, dass sie eben Familien gr眉nden k枚nnen. Wir versetzen auch M盲nner nicht mehr in die Lage, dass sie Familien gr眉nden k枚nnen. Und ich glaube, es ist eine Hauptschuld der Sozialisten, dass diese Keimzelle der Familie 眉ber Jahrzehnte hinweg aktiv zerst枚rt worden ist.

Insofern w眉rde mich mal interessieren, nachdem Sozialisten jahrelang daf眉r gesorgt haben, Familien an sich zu zerst枚ren: Was ist Ihr Plan, dass Familien grunds盲tzlich wieder in den Fokus der Gesellschaft kommen?

听听Lina G谩lvez (S&D), respuesta de 芦tarjeta azul禄. 鈥� Pues mire, yo creo que los partidos socialistas s铆 que nos hemos dedicado a las familias, porque precisamente han sido los partidos socialistas los que han estado detr谩s de la formaci贸n de los Estados del bienestar. Han estado detr谩s de los servicios p煤blicos y del empleo de calidad, porque hay una correlaci贸n directa entre el empleo de las mujeres y las tasas de fecundidad, que es el n煤mero de nacimientos por mujer en edad f茅rtil.

Por tanto, d茅jennos tambi茅n a las mujeres poder participar en la igualdad y en la libertad para hacer lo que queramos con nuestras vidas. En Europa hay diez millones m谩s de mujeres y, desde hace dos d茅cadas, hay m谩s mujeres que hombres con t铆tulos universitarios. En cambio, se nos sigue responsabilizando del cuidado.

El cuidado es responsabilidad tambi茅n de los hombres; es responsabilidad de todos. Por tanto, avancemos a otra organizaci贸n social del cuidado. Eso lo haremos siempre y cuando tambi茅n el sector p煤blico, el sector privado y todos los hombres 鈥攕obre todo los hombres鈥� se corresponsabilicen del cuidado. Porque los ni帽os, que yo sepa, todav铆a no nacen de una maquinita de caf茅.

听听President. 鈥� The services also instructed me to come back to the point of order. I just want to mention that we are not allowed to have questions addressed to the first round of political group speakers, but to come to the point of order, Ms听Garc铆a Hermida-Van Der Walle, please, you have to mention, according to the Rules, of course, the Rule that you refer to.

听听Raquel Garc铆a Hermida-Van Der Walle (Renew). 鈥� Mr President, thank you for allowing my request.

I refer to Rules of Procedure, Rule 10(4), that concerns hate speech or offensive language. The colleague from ESN used the term 'population replacement'. This is generally accepted as hate speech and offensive language, and I request that this be scrapped from the meeting and that the colleague be held responsible for using this hate speech.

听听President. 鈥� Thank you for raising the issue. According to the Rules, I will inform the Bureau about your request. A decision will be made according to the Rules of Procedure and we will inform you of the decision that was made by the Bureau.

听听Julien Sanchez (PfE). 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, dans ce rapport, vous vous inqui茅tez pour la d茅mographie en Europe. Non pas par esprit identitaire ou par d茅sir de transmettre, mais uniquement pour de basses raisons mercantiles. Pour vous, l鈥橢urope n鈥檈st pas charnelle, c鈥檈st un march茅. Votre seul souci, on l鈥檃 compris, c鈥檈st d鈥檃voir de la main-d鈥櫯搖vre. Alors votre solution est, comme souvent, uniquement 脿 court terme: c鈥檈st le recours 脿 l鈥檌mmigration, en oubliant au passage les cons茅quences horribles de l鈥檌mmigration massive pour nos peuples, 脿 qui vous ne demandez jamais leur avis sur cet accueil.

Les raisons de la crise d茅mographique sont simples, elles sont socio-茅conomiques. Beaucoup de jeunes couples europ茅ens ont envie de fonder une famille, mais ne le font pas car ils n鈥檃rrivent d茅j脿 pas 脿 vivre du fruit de leur travail. Ils ne vivent pas, ils survivent et ils ne veulent pas prendre le risque d鈥檃ccueillir un enfant dans de mauvaises conditions, qu鈥檌l s鈥檃gisse de s茅curit茅 茅conomique, sociale ou m锚me physique, car votre bilan, c鈥檈st la crise et la d茅fiance dans tous les domaines.

Essayez d鈥檈ntendre ce que je vous dis, car je me fais ici le relais du d茅sespoir et de la d茅tresse de ces jeunes Europ茅ens, de plus en plus nombreux 脿 renoncer 脿 avoir des enfants par d茅pit. Vous 锚tes responsables du visage que vous laisserez de l鈥橢urope. Pour vous, toutes les naissances se valent. 脌 titre personnel, je pr茅f猫re en Europe des naissances europ茅ennes. Pour que le visage de l鈥橢urope reste europ茅en, il est urgent de favoriser des politiques natalistes et de redonner confiance 脿 nos jeunes, plut么t que d鈥檃voir recours 脿 une immigration dont personne ne veut, si ce n鈥檈st le grand patronat, pour peser 脿 la baisse sur les salaires.

听听Marlena Mal膮g (ECR). 鈥� Panie Przewodnicz膮cy! Pani Komisarz! Szanowni Pa艅stwo, stoimy w obliczu demograficznego tsunami. Eksperci ostrzegaj膮, 偶e od 2026 roku liczba ludno艣ci Unii Europejskiej zacznie male膰, a w niekt贸rych pa艅stwach mo偶e ten spadek nawet si臋ga膰 oko艂o 30%. W ci膮gu 25 lat natomiast populacja Afryki zwi臋kszy si臋 o 1 miliard 300 milion贸w os贸b, co jeszcze mocniej nasili presj臋 migracyjn膮 na Europ臋.

Komisja Europejska musi si臋 ockn膮膰 i podj膮膰 adekwatne dzia艂ania do potrzeb. Nie forsowa膰 rozwi膮zania iluzoryczne i pozbawione sensu. Zamiast wspiera膰 rodzin臋 i tworzy膰 warunki do wzrostu liczby urodze艅, forsujemy r贸wno艣ciowe agendy, przepisy bez znaczenia dla demograficznej przysz艂o艣ci. Otwarcie granic dla migrant贸w nie rozwi膮偶e problemu, wr臋cz go pog艂臋bi. Je艣li nie podejmiemy szybkich dzia艂a艅, Europa stanie si臋 s艂aba i niekonkurencyjna.

W moim kraju, w Polsce, za rz膮d贸w Prawa i Sprawiedliwo艣ci przyj臋to strategi臋 demograficzn膮 i z przykro艣ci膮 stwierdzam, 偶e dzi艣 nie jest ona realizowana. I r贸wnie偶 by艂 pe艂nomocnik rz膮du ds. polityki demograficznej. Czas na zmian臋 polityki. Nie jutro, nie za miesi膮c, teraz, zanim b臋dzie za p贸藕no.

听听Raquel Garc铆a Hermida-Van Der Walle (Renew). 鈥� Voorzitter, als we onze kinderen het recht gunnen in hun eigen regio te blijven, moeten we anderen ook het recht gunnen om hiernaartoe te komen. Veel Europeanen willen in hun eigen dorp kunnen blijven wonen. Daartoe moeten er huizen zijn, moet het ziekenhuis in de regio openblijven, moet er een school zijn op loopafstand en moet het dorpshuis niet kopje onder gaan als gevolg van hoge energiekosten.

Dit betekent dat we vakmensen nodig hebben, van binnen en van buiten Europa: meer dokters en verpleegkundigen, meer leraren voor de klas en meer mensen die zonnepanelen kunnen plaatsen op de daken. Alleen zo kunnen Europeanen in onze regio鈥檚 opgroeien en oud worden.

In plaats van te investeren in de regio en vooruitgang mogelijk te maken, trappen populisten echter keihard op de rem en slaan ze de deur dicht voor goede vakmensen. We hebben geen populisme maar optimisme nodig: met de blik naar buiten in plaats van de kop in het zand.

听听Jo茫o Oliveira (The Left). 鈥� Senhor Presidente, o d茅fice demogr谩fico 茅 um problema grave e est谩 diretamente relacionado com a degrada莽茫o das condi莽玫es de vida, com os entraves 脿 autonomia dos jovens, com as dificuldades na tomada de decis茫o de constitui莽茫o de fam铆lia, que resultam da instabilidade do emprego, de hor谩rios de trabalho desregulados, das dificuldades em encontrar uma casa que se possa pagar.

Por isso, 茅 absolutamente necess谩rio inverter as pol铆ticas que t锚m imposto estas dificuldades.

脡 preciso o apoio da Uni茫o Europeia a pol铆ticas nacionais que promovam o aumento dos sal谩rios, a redu莽茫o e regula莽茫o dos hor谩rios de trabalho, a estabilidade no emprego; a pol铆ticas que valorizem a fun莽茫o social da maternidade, aprofundem os direitos de maternidade e paternidade e garantam os direitos das crian莽as e dos pais.

脡 preciso o apoio da Uni茫o Europeia a pol铆ticas nacionais de investimento nos servi莽os p煤blicos, incluindo em redes p煤blicas de creches de acesso universal e gratuito. 脡 preciso o apoio da UE a pol铆ticas nacionais de investimento no aumento da oferta p煤blica de habita莽茫o.

Tudo isso exige o abandono das pol铆ticas neoliberais que t锚m constitu铆do um dos pilares do processo de integra莽茫o capitalista europeu.

E a quest茫o que deixamos 茅 simples: h谩 mesmo vontade de mudar essas pol铆ticas para combater o d茅fice demogr谩fico, ou este debate serve apenas para aliviar consci锚ncias?

(O orador aceita responder a uma pergunta 芦cart茫o azul禄)

听听Ana Miranda Paz (Verts/ALE), Pergunta segundo o procedimento 芦cart茫o azul禄. 鈥� Senhor Deputado, fala de pol铆ticas que est茫o contra os territ贸rios.

Eu quero falar-lhe de uma quest茫o que foi afastada do seu pa铆s, de Portugal. H谩 uma bomba ambiental no cora莽茫o do meu pa铆s, a Galiza, que 茅 o projeto da Altri.

A Altri 茅 apoiada pelo Governo galego, do Partido Popular, e quer produzir, na Galiza, 400 mil toneladas de celulose sol煤vel e expulsar a povoa莽茫o dos nossos territ贸rios.

Os senhores sabem disso em Portugal. Eu quero saber a sua opini茫o.

听听Jo茫o Oliveira (The Left), Resposta segundo o procedimento 芦cart茫o azul禄. 鈥� Senhora Deputada, uma das quest玫es essenciais para combater o d茅fice demogr谩fico 茅, de facto, a garantia do emprego e a garantia da capacidade de organizar a vida de cada fam铆lia a partir dessa condi莽茫o essencial. 脡 preciso emprego.

E pol铆ticas como essas 鈥� de promo莽茫o do eucalipto, por exemplo 鈥�, desligadas da realidade dos territ贸rios e que n茫o permitem a fixa莽茫o das popula莽玫es nos territ贸rios de onde s茫o oriundas, nem a organiza莽茫o da vida das fam铆lias jovens nesses territ贸rios, naturalmente, conduzem n茫o apenas ao d茅fice demogr谩fico, a decis玫es de adiar a constitui莽茫o de fam铆lia, mas tamb茅m a decis玫es de emigra莽茫o e de abandono destes territ贸rios.

Naturalmente, essa 茅 tamb茅m uma das quest玫es que tem de ser considerada para combater o d茅fice demogr谩fico.

听听袪邪写邪 袥邪泄泻芯胁邪 (ESN). 鈥� 袦薪芯谐芯 褔械褋褌芯 褋械 谐芯胁芯褉懈 蟹邪 写械屑芯谐褉邪褎褋泻邪 泻褉懈蟹邪, 薪芯 胁褋褗褖薪芯褋褌 褌褟 械 械褌薪芯写械屑芯谐褉邪褎褋泻邪. 袨褋胁械薪 锌褉芯斜谢械屑懈褌械 褋 褉邪卸写邪械屑芯褋褌褌邪 胁 袝胁褉芯锌邪 褋械 锌褉芯屑械薪褟 械褌薪懈褔械褋泻懈褟褌 褋褗褋褌邪胁 薪邪 薪邪褋械谢械薪懈械褌芯, 泻邪褌芯 泻芯薪褌懈薪械薪褌褗褌 褋褌邪胁邪 胁褋械 锌芯-屑褞褋褞谢屑邪薪褋泻懈. 孝芯胁邪 薪械 械 褋邪屑芯 写械屑芯谐褉邪褎褋泻懈, 薪芯 懈 褉械谢懈谐懈芯蟹械薪 锌褉芯斜谢械屑, 蟹邪褖芯褌芯 泻芯褉械薪懈褌械 薪邪 袝胁褉芯锌邪 褋邪 胁 褏褉懈褋褌懈褟薪褋褌胁芯褌芯 懈 褏褉懈褋褌懈褟薪褋泻邪褌邪 褑懈胁懈谢懈蟹邪褑懈褟. 袦懈谐褉邪褑懈褟褌邪 褔械褋褌芯 褋械 锌褉械写褋褌邪胁褟 泻邪褌芯 锌邪薪邪褑械褟, 薪芯 胁褋褗褖薪芯褋褌 褌褟 蟹邪写褗谢斜芯褔邪胁邪 泻褉懈蟹邪褌邪.

袙邪卸薪芯 械 写邪 褋械 褉邪蟹斜械褉械, 褔械 锌褉芯斜谢械屑褗褌 薪械 械 褎懈薪邪薪褋芯胁. 袛芯褉懈 薪邪泄-斜芯谐邪褌懈褌械 写褗褉卸邪胁懈 胁 袝胁褉芯锌邪 褋邪 蟹邪褋械谐薪邪褌懈, 邪 写械屑芯谐褉邪褎褋泻邪褌邪 泻褉懈蟹邪 薪械 屑芯卸械 写邪 斜褗写械 褉械褕械薪邪 褋 屑械褏邪薪懈褔薪懈 懈薪褋褌褉褍屑械薪褌懈 泻邪褌芯 写械屑芯谐褉邪褎褋泻懈褟 懈薪褋褌褉褍屑械薪褌邪褉懈褍屑 2023. 孝褟 懈蟹懈褋泻胁邪 锌褉芯屑褟薪邪 胁 褑械薪薪芯褋褌懈褌械 懈 薪邪褔懈薪邪, 锌芯 泻芯泄褌芯 褌芯蟹懈 褋褗褞蟹 屑懈褋谢懈.

袟邪 写邪 褋械 褋锌褉邪胁懈屑 褋 褌芯蟹懈 锌褉芯斜谢械屑, 械 薪械芯斜褏芯写懈屑芯 胁褗蟹褋褌邪薪芯胁褟胁邪薪械 薪邪 芯褋薪芯胁薪懈褌械 褑械薪薪芯褋褌懈, 泻芯懈褌芯 斜褟褏邪 褉邪蟹褉褍褕械薪懈 芯褌 薪械芯谢懈斜械褉邪谢薪懈褌械 懈写械芯谢芯谐懈褔械褋泻懈 锌芯谢懈褌懈泻懈. 袗泻芯 薪褟屑邪 泻褍褉邪卸 懈 卸械谢邪薪懈械 蟹邪 卸懈胁芯褌, 薪褟屑邪 写邪 懈屑邪 写械屑芯谐褉邪褎褋泻懈 芯斜褉邪褌. 袝胁褉芯锌邪 褌褉褟斜胁邪 写邪 胁褗蟹褋褌邪薪芯胁懈 芯褋薪芯胁薪懈褌械 褋懈 褑械薪薪芯褋褌懈, 蟹邪褖芯褌芯 胁 械写薪芯 蟹写褉邪胁芯 芯斜褖械褋褌胁芯 薪邪泄-谐芯谢褟屑邪褌邪 褑械薪薪芯褋褌 褋邪 写械褑邪褌邪.

听听President. 鈥� Another point of order from Ms听Garc铆a Hermida-Van Der Walle.

听听Raquel Garc铆a Hermida-Van Der Walle (Renew). 鈥� Mr听President, I will keep saying this: Rule 10(4) of the Rules of Procedure make hate speech and offensive language something we should not allow.

Hate speech is clearly defined. 'Population replacement' and every other synonym 鈥� this is Nazi terminology; we all know that. This should not be allowed in this Chamber.

听听President. 鈥� The Rules are clear. Of course, where colleagues appeal to those respective Rules, as I said earlier, we take note of the considerations and the requests made. We will address the issue to the Bureau, and the Bureau will make a decision on this request.

If there are similar requests on other speeches, anyone can do it. But, of course, please refer to the Rules. And in this case, the Rules are clear. Let's try, of course, to respect the Rules of this House, all of us.

听听螠伪蟻委伪 螙伪蠂伪蟻委伪 (NI). 鈥� 螝蠉蟻喂蔚 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 纬喂伪蟿委 未蔚谓 魏维谓慰蠀谓 蟺伪喂未喂维 慰喂 维谓胃蟻蠅蟺慰喂; 螕喂伪蟿委 味慰蠀谓 蟽蔚 伪蟺蠈纬谓蠅蟽畏. 危蟿畏蟻委尉伪蟿蔚 蟿喂蟼 蔚位委蟿, 蟿慰蠀蟼 蟺位慰蠉蟽喂慰蠀蟼, 魏伪喂 蔚蟺喂尾维位伪蟿蔚 苇谓伪谓 伪未蠀蟽蠋蟺畏蟿慰 谓蔚慰蠁喂位蔚位蔚蠀胃蔚蟻喂蟽渭蠈 蟺慰蠀 蟿蟽维魏喂蟽蔚 蟿慰蠀蟼 位伪慰蠉蟼, 蔚尉伪蠁维谓喂蟽蔚 蟿慰 魏慰喂谓蠅谓喂魏蠈 魏蟻维蟿慰蟼, 尾蠉胃喂蟽蔚 蟿慰蠀蟼 蟺慰位委蟿蔚蟼 蟽蟿畏 蠁蟿蠋蠂蔚喂伪. 危蟿畏谓 螘位位维未伪 蟿伪 未畏渭蠈蟽喂伪 谓慰蟽慰魏慰渭蔚委伪 未蔚谓 苇蠂慰蠀谓 蟺蟻慰蟽蠅蟺喂魏蠈, 蠀位喂魏维, 蠀蟺慰未慰渭苇蟼, 慰喂 蟽蠂慰位喂魏苇蟼 渭慰谓维未蔚蟼 未蔚谓 苇蠂慰蠀谓 蟺蠈蟻慰蠀蟼 魏伪喂 未伪蟽魏维位慰蠀蟼. 螣喂 纬慰谓蔚委蟼 蟺伪位蔚蠉慰蠀谓 谓伪 蟺位畏蟻蠋蟽慰蠀谓 蠁蟻慰谓蟿喂蟽蟿萎蟻喂伪 纬喂伪 蟿伪 蟺伪喂未喂维 蟿慰蠀蟼. 巍蠅蟿萎蟽蟿蔚 蟿慰蠀蟼 蟺慰位委蟿蔚蟼 蟺蠋蟼 胃伪 蟺位畏蟻蠋蟽慰蠀谓 蔚谓慰委魏喂伪 蟺慰蠀 蔚魏蟿喂谓维蟽蟽慰谓蟿伪喂 蟽蟿伪 蠉蠄畏. 螤蠋蟼 胃伪 味萎蟽慰蠀谓 渭蔚 渭喂蟽胃慰蠉蟼 蟺蔚委谓伪蟼 魏伪喂 蟺蠋蟼 胃伪 渭蔚纬伪位蠋蟽慰蠀谓 蟺伪喂未喂维; 螣喂 蟺慰位蠉蟿蔚魏谓蔚蟼 魏伪喂 渭慰谓慰纬慰谓蔚蠆魏苇蟼 慰喂魏慰纬苇谓蔚喂蔚蟼 蟺伪位蔚蠉慰蠀谓 渭蔚 蟿伪 胃畏蟻委伪. 螚 伪魏蟻委尾蔚喂伪 魏伪喂 畏 蔚尉伪胃位委蠅蟽畏 蠂蟿蠀蟺慰蠉谓 魏维胃蔚 蟽蟺委蟿喂 魏伪喂 畏 蔚位蟺委未伪 苇蠂蔚喂 蟽尾萎蟽蔚喂. 螛苇位蔚蟿蔚 纬蔚谓谓萎蟽蔚喂蟼; 螖蠋蟽蟿蔚 蟽蟿慰蠀蟼 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰蠀蟼 伪尉喂慰蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂伪, 伪蠀尉萎蟽蟿蔚 蟿慰蠀蟼 渭喂蟽胃慰蠉蟼, 蟽蟿畏蟻委尉蟿蔚 蟿喂蟼 慰喂魏慰纬苇谓蔚喂蔚蟼, 蟽蟿伪渭伪蟿萎蟽蟿蔚 蟿慰蠀蟼 蟺位蔚喂蟽蟿畏蟻喂伪蟽渭慰蠉蟼 蟺蟻蠋蟿畏蟼 魏伪蟿慰喂魏委伪蟼, 未蠋蟽蟿蔚 蟽蟺委蟿喂伪 谓伪 渭蔚委谓慰蠀谓, 未蠋蟽蟿蔚 位蔚蠁蟿维 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 蠀纬蔚委伪, 位蔚蠁蟿维 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 蟺伪喂未蔚委伪. 螚 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏 蟿蠅谓 位伪蠋谓 萎 胃伪 蟽蟿畏蟻委尉蔚喂 蟿畏谓 魏慰喂谓蠅谓喂魏萎 蟽蠀谓慰蠂萎 萎 胃伪 蟺蔚胃维谓蔚喂. 螚 蔚蠀胃蠉谓畏 蔚委谓伪喂 未喂魏萎 蟽伪蟼.

听听Romana Tomc (PPE). 鈥� Gospod predsednik! Spo拧tovana gospa komisarka Dubravka 艩uica! Najlep拧a hvala za va拧o dana拧njo predstavitev. Hvala seveda tudi za vse delo, ki ste ga do sedaj opravili na podro膷ju demografije v prej拧njem mandatu.

V Evropi zaznavamo znaten upad rodnosti, vse bolj starajo膷e se prebivalstvo in izrazita teritorialna neravnovesja. Ta globok demografski upad predstavlja pomembne posledice za sisteme socialnega varstva, za trg dela, za pokojninske sisteme, za zdravstveno varstvo in za socialno kohezijo, kar seveda zahteva ciljno usmerjene politike.

沤alosti me dejstvo, da sedanja Evropska komisija nima posebnega resorja za demografijo in da je ta tematika razdeljena kar 拧tirim komisarjem. Prav tako bi morala biti Komisija klju膷ni igralec pri upravljanju demografskega prehoda.

Z demografijo seveda ne ozna膷ujemo samo probleme starej拧ih. Pri prihajajo膷i demografski zimi se bodo s te啪avami soo膷ale vse generacije, vsak segment dru啪be. Zato menim, da bi morali dimenzijo demografije vklju膷evati v vse horizontalne dokumente, ki jih sprejemamo na ravni Evropske unije.

Vesela pa sem, da so politi膷ne skupine v Evropskem parlamentu prepoznale pomembnost demografije in da imamo uradno potrjeno skupino za demografijo, v kateri bomo poskrbeli, da na starajo膷o se dru啪bo, za mlade in za 啪enske, za dru啪ine, ki so temelj na拧e dru啪be, ne bomo pozabili.

听听Sabrina Repp (S&D). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident! Ein selbstbestimmtes Leben im l盲ndlichen Raum mit guten Arbeitspl盲tzen, bezahlbarem Wohnen, einem guten Bildungsangebot, einer barrierearmen Infrastruktur, wo Jung wie Alt gut und gerne leben. Doch die Realit盲t sieht oft anders aus. Immer h盲ufiger wird Stadt gegen Land ausgespielt. Frauen werden in traditionelle Rollen gedr盲ngt, jungen Menschen fehlen die beruflichen Perspektiven, und 盲ltere Menschen haben es schwer, die notwendige Versorgungsinfrastruktur zu erreichen. Das Ergebnis: Viele verlassen ihre Heimat und ziehen in St盲dte. Das darf nicht so bleiben. Die Menschen vor Ort haben das Recht, ihre Zukunft zu gestalten, dort, wo sie verwurzelt sind, und Europa muss dabei unterst眉tzen.

Die europ盲ische Koh盲sionspolitik bietet gro脽e Chancen, genau diese strukturellen Defizite auszugleichen und gleichwertige Lebensverh盲ltnisse f眉r alle zu schaffen, beispielsweise durch die gezielte Unterst眉tzung von Frauen im l盲ndlichen Raum, durch gezielte Weiterbildung, durch Gr眉ndungsf枚rderung, durch verbesserte Vereinbarkeit von Familie und Beruf. Solche Ma脽nahmen st盲rken Frauen und auch die gesamte Region. Sie f枚rdern den gesellschaftlichen Zusammenhalt. Wir sollten aufh枚ren, Jung gegen Alt, Stadt gegen Land gegeneinander auszuspielen. Unsere Aufgabe ist es, sie n盲her zusammenzubringen.

听听Mireia Borr谩s Pab贸n (PfE). 鈥� Se帽or presidente, Europa ya es la regi贸n con la tasa de natalidad y la poblaci贸n m谩s envejecida del mundo. Sus pol铆ticas vac铆an nuestras cunas mientras nuestras fronteras no paran de llenarse y, as铆, Europa ha dejado de ser la cuna de la civilizaci贸n para ser la cuna vac铆a de un continente que ustedes est谩n llevando a morir. Con sus pol铆ticas de reemplazo demogr谩fico no solo destruyen nuestra identidad, sino que atentan contra la seguridad de todos los europeos.

En Espa帽a, solo en 2024 entraron casi 64听000听inmigrantes ilegales. Si importamos masiva y descontroladamente Argelia a Europa, tenemos los problemas de criminalidad de Argelia en Europa. 驴Lo entienden o quieren que toda Europa acabe como los barrios de Molenbeek en Bruselas o Saint-Denis en Par铆s?

Y, mientras Europa y Espa帽a reciben oleadas de inmigrantes ilegales, el n煤mero de hijos por mujer es de apenas 1,12; muy lejos del m铆nimo necesario para el reemplazo generacional, que, como sabr谩n, es de 2,1. As铆 pues, les dir茅 desde aqu铆 que Europa no necesita reemplazos demogr谩ficos: necesita impulsar su natalidad. Y, si no saben c贸mo hacerlo, tomen ejemplo de Hungr铆a y copien sus medidas. Se帽or铆as, o llenamos nuestras cunas o Europa ser谩 el epitafio de su propia civilizaci贸n.

(La oradora acepta responder a una pregunta formulada con arreglo al procedimiento de la 芦tarjeta azul禄)

听听Jo茫o Oliveira (The Left), Pergunta segundo o procedimento 芦cart茫o azul禄. 鈥� Senhora Deputada, fez uma interven莽茫o de 贸dio contra os imigrantes e de desprezo pelas dificuldades que as jovens fam铆lias t锚m, que n茫o lhes permitem tomar a decis茫o de ter filhos.

E a pergunta que lhe fa莽o 茅 simples: a extrema-direita tem mesmo alguma solu莽茫o para algum problema da sociedade? A extrema-direita consegue apresentar uma proposta, uma solu莽茫o que seja, que n茫o seja de 贸dio contra outros, que n茫o seja de desprezo pelas dificuldades dos povos?

Parece-me que a senhora deputada pode ter alguma dificuldade em dar essa resposta, mas as suas dificuldades ser茫o, tamb茅m, uma boa resposta para quem ouvir este debate.

听听Mireia Borr谩s Pab贸n (PfE), respuesta de 芦tarjeta azul禄. 鈥� La extrema derecha, dice. No, no somos extrema derecha, somos el partido del sentido com煤n, porque somos los 煤nicos que nos atrevemos a denunciar y a explicar la realidad que est谩n sufriendo, efectivamente, muchas de las familias m谩s vulnerables por culpa de pol铆ticas de inmigraci贸n masiva, descontrolada, que luego va a los barrios m谩s vulnerables y m谩s humildes de toda Europa y de Espa帽a.

驴Y respecto a las medidas que tenemos? Por supuesto que s铆, tenemos much铆simas medidas; entre ellas, por ejemplo, apoyar a las familias, tambi茅n a las familias numerosas, esas que ustedes no paran de atacar desde el Partido Socialista. No paran de atacar a las familias, no paran de atacar a las mujeres, no paran de establecer pol铆ticas que, en lugar de ir en apoyo de esas familias y de esas mujeres para que puedan conciliar y para que puedan tener hijos, lo que hacen es atacarlas y hacerles la vida todav铆a mucho m谩s imposible. Tenemos pol铆ticas de fiscalidad, de apoyo al emprendimiento, de conciliaci贸n familiar. Hay much铆simas...

(el presidente retira la palabra a la oradora)

听听Georgiana Teodorescu (ECR). 鈥� Domnule pre葯edinte, faptul c膬 Uniunea European膬 are o mare problem膬 demografic膬 nu este nicio noutate. Studii, rapoarte, linii politice, agende strategice: toate demonstreaz膬 c膬 natalitatea este 卯n sc膬dere 葯i c膬 nu putem 葯i nici nu cred c膬 trebuie s膬 acoperim deficitul de cet膬葲eni europeni cu migran葲i din 葲膬ri non-UE. Pentru a rezolva problema demografic膬, trebuie s膬 ne asum膬m dou膬 direc葲ii:

1. s膬 卯ncuraj膬m natalitatea prin oferirea de solu葲ii locative pragmatice, de construire de locuin葲e ieftine pentru tineri 葯i totodat膬 de facilit膬葲i fiscale pentru familiile cu mul葲i copii, precum 葯i de programe de revenire gradual膬 a mamelor la locul de munc膬 葯i.

2. s膬 cre葯tem economiile 葲膬rilor membre, astfel 卯nc芒t nivelul salarial minim al cet膬葲enilor s膬 fie unul 卯ndestul膬tor pentru ca tinerii s膬 卯葯i asume rolul de p膬rin葲i.

脦n concluzie, case 葯i salarii bune. F膬r膬 acestea vom asista la o pr膬bu葯ire a civiliza葲iei europene 葯i la o dezeuropenizare cauzat膬 de fenomenul crescut al migra葲iei. Uita葲i-v膬 卯n jur, nu vi se pare c膬 卯ncet-卯ncet suntem coloniza葲i? Mai vrem s膬 mai existe civiliza葲ia european膬 peste 50 de ani sau nu?

(Vorbitoarea a acceptat s膬 r膬spund膬 la o 卯ntrebare adresat膬 卯n conformitate cu procedura 鈥瀋artona葯ului albastru鈥�)

听听Ana Miranda Paz (Verts/ALE), pregunta de 芦tarjeta azul禄. 鈥� Cuando escucho discursos como el suyo o como el de la anterior oradora del partido VOX en los que hablan de inmigrantes ilegales, me pregunto: 驴saben ustedes por qu茅 entran as铆 esas personas que vienen para vivir, que vienen para trabajar y que vienen muchas veces para salvarse de situaciones muy duras, porque no hay v铆as legales?

Hablo de esas personas que, como los emigrantes gallegos que en su momento viv铆an en Molenbeek 鈥攓ue han construido tambi茅n Europa鈥�, est谩n construyendo Europa y son parte de nuestra realidad. 驴Cu谩ndo van a acabar ustedes con estos discursos de odio?

听听Georgiana Teodorescu (ECR), r膬spuns la o 卯ntrebare adresat膬 卯n conformitate cu procedura 鈥瀋artona葯ului albastru鈥�. 鈥� Nu este vorba de un discurs de ur膬, este vorba de o chestiune pragmatic膬. Punem sau nu cet膬葲eanul european pe primul loc? Suntem 卯ntr-o institu葲ie european膬 葯i suntem ale葯i de europeni ca s膬 reprezent膬m interesele 葲膬rilor membre ale Uniunii Europene. Asta 卯nseamn膬 s膬 prioritiz膬m interesul cet膬葲eanului european.

O s膬 v膬 reamintesc un lucru despre 葲ara mea: Rom芒nia a dat foarte mul葲i migran葲i care au plecat legal din 葲ar膬 pentru a c膬uta condi葲ii de munc膬 mai bune 葯i pentru a c膬uta un trai mai bun 卯n alte 葲膬ri 葯i nu 卯ntotdeauna au fost bine primi葲i, nu 卯ntotdeauna au fost mult respecta葲i, dar asta nu 卯nseamn膬 c膬 trebuie s膬 facem o compara葲ie 卯ntre situa葲ia migran葲ilor legali 葯i situa葲ia migran葲ilor ilegali.

听听螡委魏慰蟼 螤伪蟺蟺维蟼 (The Left). 鈥� 螝蠉蟻喂蔚 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 蔚蟺喂蟿蟻苇蠄蟿蔚 渭慰蠀 谓伪 蟽伪蟼 渭喂位萎蟽蠅 蠈蠂喂 蠅蟼 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏蠈蟼 伪位位维 蠅蟼 谓苇慰蟼 维谓胃蟻蠅蟺慰蟼. 危蟿畏谓 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏 蟿畏蟼 慰喂魏慰谓慰渭喂魏萎蟼 伪谓伪蟽蠁维位蔚喂伪蟼, 蟿畏蟼 伪魏蟻委尾蔚喂伪蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏蟼 蟽蟿蔚纬伪蟽蟿喂魏萎蟼 魏蟻委蟽畏蟼, 蟺蠋蟼 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 蟺维蟻蔚喂 蟿畏谓 伪蟺蠈蠁伪蟽畏 苇谓伪蟼 谓苇慰蟼 谓伪 未畏渭喂慰蠀蟻纬萎蟽蔚喂 慰喂魏慰纬苇谓蔚喂伪; 螒蟼 蠁苇蟻蠅 苇谓伪 蟺伪蟻维未蔚喂纬渭伪 伪蟺蠈 蟿畏 蠂蠋蟻伪 渭慰蠀, 蟿畏谓 螘位位维未伪, 蟺慰蠀 伪谓蟿喂渭蔚蟿蠅蟺委味蔚喂 蟽慰尾伪蟻蠈 未畏渭慰纬蟻伪蠁喂魏蠈 蟺蟻蠈尾位畏渭伪. 螆谓伪蟼 魏伪位蠈蟼, 喂魏伪谓慰蟺慰喂畏蟿喂魏蠈蟼 渭喂蟽胃蠈蟼 蔚委谓伪喂 1 200 蔚蠀蟻蠋. 螡伪 谓慰喂魏喂维蟽蔚喂蟼 苇谓伪 蟽蟺委蟿喂 渭喂魏蟻蠈 蟽蔚 渭喂伪 渭苇蟿蟻喂伪 蟺蔚蟻喂慰蠂萎 魏慰蟽蟿委味蔚喂 600 蔚蠀蟻蠋. 螚 蟿喂渭萎 蟿蠅谓 魏伪蠀蟽委渭蠅谓 伪纬纬委味蔚喂 蟿伪 2 蔚蠀蟻蠋. 螣喂 蟿喂渭苇蟼 蟽蟿伪 蟽慰蠉蟺蔚蟻 渭维蟻魏蔚蟿 蔚委谓伪喂 伪蟺位畏蟽委伪蟽蟿蔚蟼, 蟿慰 蟻蔚蠉渭伪 苇蠂蔚喂 未喂蟺位伪蟽喂伪蟽蟿蔚委, 伪魏蠈渭伪 魏伪喂 蟿伪 尾伪蟽喂魏维 伪纬伪胃维 蔚委谓伪喂 蟺维蟻伪 蟺慰位蠉 伪魏蟻喂尾维. 螤蠋蟼 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委, 位慰喂蟺蠈谓, 苇谓伪蟼 维谓胃蟻蠅蟺慰蟼 魏维蟿蠅 伪蟺蠈 伪蠀蟿苇蟼 蟿喂蟼 蟽蠀谓胃萎魏蔚蟼 谓伪 慰谓蔚喂蟻蔚蠀蟿蔚委 谓伪 未畏渭喂慰蠀蟻纬萎蟽蔚喂 渭委伪 慰喂魏慰纬苇谓蔚喂伪; 螡伪 蟽伪蟼 蟺蠅 蔚纬蠋. 螒蟺位维 未蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委. 螒蟼 蟽蟿伪渭伪蟿萎蟽慰蠀渭蔚 位慰喂蟺蠈谓 蟿伪 蔚蠀蠂慰位蠈纬喂伪 魏伪喂 伪蟼 位维尾慰蠀渭蔚 伪蟺慰蠁维蟽蔚喂蟼 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 维渭蔚蟽畏 蟺蟻慰蠋胃畏蟽畏 魏慰喂谓蠅谓喂魏蠋谓 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏蠋谓, 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏蠋谓 蟽蟿苇纬伪蟽畏蟼, 未喂伪蟽蠁维位喂蟽畏蟼 蟿畏蟼 蟺蟻蠈蟽尾伪蟽畏蟼 蟽蔚 蟺慰喂慰蟿喂魏萎 蟺伪喂未蔚委伪 渭蔚 蟺伪喂未喂魏萎 渭苇蟻喂渭谓伪 魏伪喂 喂蟽慰蟻蟻慰蟺委伪 渭蔚蟿伪尉蠉 蔚蟺伪纬纬蔚位渭伪蟿喂魏萎蟼 魏伪喂 喂未喂蠅蟿喂魏萎蟼 味蠅萎蟼. 螚 未畏渭慰纬蟻伪蠁委伪 蟿畏蟼 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏蟼 魏喂谓未蠀谓蔚蠉蔚喂 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰谓 魏伪蟺喂蟿伪位喂蟽渭蠈 魏伪喂 蠈蠂喂 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰蠀蟼 渭蔚蟿伪谓维蟽蟿蔚蟼.

听听Ivan David (ESN). 鈥� Pane p艡edsedaj铆c铆, 煤padek populace je p艡铆znak rozkladu spole膷nosti. Spole膷nost se rozpadla na jednotlivce, kte艡铆 nemaj铆 v臎dom铆 p艡铆slu拧nosti a odpov臎dnosti k jak茅koli komunit臎, ani k 拧ir拧铆 rodin臎, ani obci, ani n谩rodu, ani st谩tu, kter媒 by pokl谩dali za vlastn铆. Nemaj铆 pocit, 啪e by m臎li p艡isp铆vat ke spole膷n茅mu prosp臎chu. Mlad谩 generace, od n铆啪 se o膷ek谩v谩, 啪e bude plodit potomky, m谩 ve sv茅 v臎t拧in臎 pod vlivem ideologie od d臎tstv铆 pocit, 啪e jsou v臎艡itel茅 a spole膷nost dlu啪n铆kem a smyslem 啪ivota je z谩bava. Domn铆vaj铆 se, 啪e m铆t potomky nep艡in谩拧铆 啪谩dn茅 v媒hody, proto啪e se mohou spolehnout sami na sebe a v p艡铆pad臎 nezdaru m谩 spole膷nost splatit dluh, kter媒 v暖膷i nim m谩. Lid茅 啪ij铆 ve velmi nestabiln铆 soci谩ln铆 situaci. Samostatn茅 bydlen铆 je pro st谩le v臎t拧铆 膷谩st lid铆 nedostupn茅 a 啪ivot v izolaci je nenau膷il kooperaci, vz谩jemn茅mu respektu a odpov臎dnosti. Evropsk谩 komise nep艡inese 艡e拧en铆, je sou膷谩st铆 probl茅mu.

听听螡喂魏蠈位伪慰蟼 螒谓伪未喂蠋蟿畏蟼 (NI). 鈥� 螝蠉蟻喂蔚 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 蟿慰 未畏渭慰纬蟻伪蠁喂魏蠈 蟺蟻蠈尾位畏渭伪 蟿畏蟼 螘位位维未伪蟼 蟽蠀谓慰蠄委味蔚蟿伪喂 蟽蟿喂蟼 位苇尉蔚喂蟼 芦蟿苇位蔚喂伪 魏伪蟿伪喂纬委未伪禄. 螘未蠋 魏伪喂 苇谓伪谓 伪喂蠋谓伪 伪谓蟿喂渭蔚蟿蠅蟺委味慰蠀渭蔚 伪蟻谓畏蟿喂魏维 蟻蔚魏蠈蟻 渭蔚 蟿喂蟼 位喂纬蠈蟿蔚蟻蔚蟼 纬蔚谓谓萎蟽蔚喂蟼 魏伪喂 蟿慰蠀蟼 蟺蔚蟻喂蟽蟽蠈蟿蔚蟻慰蠀蟼 胃伪谓维蟿慰蠀蟼, 蠂维谓慰谓蟿伪蟼 苇蟿蟽喂 魏维胃蔚 蠂蟻蠈谓慰 蟿慰 喂蟽慰未蠉谓伪渭慰 渭喂伪蟼 蟺蠈位畏蟼 65 000 魏伪蟿慰委魏蠅谓 蟺蔚蟻委蟺慰蠀, 蔚蟺委未慰蟽畏 蟺慰蠀 渭伪蟼 魏伪蟿伪蟿维蟽蟽蔚喂 蟽蟿慰 蠂蔚喂蟻蠈蟿蔚蟻慰 5 % 蟿慰蠀 蟺位伪谓萎蟿畏. 螤慰位位慰委 谓苇慰喂 蠁慰尾慰蠉谓蟿伪喂 谓伪 魏维谓慰蠀谓 慰喂魏慰纬苇谓蔚喂伪 魏伪喂 蟺伪喂未喂维, 蔚纬魏伪蟿伪位蔚委蟺慰谓蟿伪蟼 渭维位喂蟽蟿伪 蟿畏 蠂蠋蟻伪 纬喂伪 苇谓伪 魏伪位蠉蟿蔚蟻慰 蔚蟻纬伪蟽喂伪魏蠈 蟺蔚蟻喂尾维位位慰谓. 韦畏谓 委未喂伪 蠋蟻伪, 畏 谓慰渭慰胃蔚蟿喂魏萎 渭蠀蠅蟺委伪 慰尉蠉谓蔚喂 蟿慰 蟺蟻蠈尾位畏渭伪 蟺伪谓蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏维. 螒谓蟿喂渭蔚蟿蠅蟺委味慰蠀渭蔚 蟿畏 纬萎蟻伪谓蟽畏 蟿慰蠀 蟺位畏胃蠀蟽渭慰蠉 伪蟺慰魏位蔚喂蟽蟿喂魏维 蠅蟼 蔚蟺委未蟻伪蟽畏 蟽蟿畏谓 蟿蟽苇蟺畏 渭伪蟼, 蟺蟻慰尾维位位慰谓蟿伪蟼 蠅蟼 未萎胃蔚谓 位蠉蟽畏 蟿畏谓 伪谓蟿喂魏伪蟿维蟽蟿伪蟽畏 渭蔚 伪蠁蟻慰伪蟽喂伪蟿喂魏慰蠉蟼 蟺位畏胃蠀蟽渭慰蠉蟼, 慰喂 慰蟺慰委慰喂 未蔚谓 蟺蟻慰蟿委胃蔚谓蟿伪喂 魏伪喂 未蔚谓 蔚谓蟽蠅渭伪蟿蠋谓慰谓蟿伪喂 蟽蟿慰谓 蟺慰位喂蟿喂蟽渭蠈 渭伪蟼. 螤伪蟻伪尾喂维味慰蠀渭蔚 蟿畏谓 喂蔚蟻蠈蟿畏蟿伪 蟿畏蟼 伪纬苇谓谓畏蟿畏蟼 味蠅萎蟼, 蔚谓蠋 谓慰渭慰胃蔚蟿慰蠉渭蔚 渭伪谓喂蠅未蠋蟼 魏伪喂 未喂伪蠁畏渭委味慰蠀渭蔚 渭慰蟻蠁苇蟼 蟽蠀渭尾委蠅蟽畏蟼 魏伪喂 蟿蟻蠈蟺慰蠀 味蠅萎蟼 蟺慰蠀 伪谓蟿喂尾伪委谓慰蠀谓 蟽蟿慰蠀蟼 蠁蠀蟽喂魏慰蠉蟼 伪谓伪蟺伪蟻伪纬蠅纬喂魏慰蠉蟼 谓蠈渭慰蠀蟼. 螘维谓 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿喂魏维 胃苇位慰蠀渭蔚 蟿畏谓 蔚蟺喂尾委蠅蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏蟼, 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 蟺蟻慰蟽蟿伪蟿蔚蠉蟽慰蠀渭蔚 蟿畏谓 伪纬苇谓谓畏蟿畏 味蠅萎, 蟿畏 渭畏蟿蟻蠈蟿畏蟿伪, 蟿畏谓 蟺伪蟻伪未慰蟽喂伪魏萎 慰喂魏慰纬苇谓蔚喂伪, 魏伪蟿伪尾维位位慰谓蟿伪蟼 纬蔚谓谓伪委慰蠀蟼 蟺蠈蟻慰蠀蟼 蟽蔚 纬蔚谓谓萎蟽蔚喂蟼 谓苇蠅谓 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪委蠅谓. 螡伪 蔚蟺伪谓蔚蠉蟻慰蠀渭蔚 蟿喂蟼 伪尉委蔚蟼 蟽蟿喂蟼 慰蟺慰委蔚蟼 蟽蟿畏蟻委蠂蟿畏魏蔚 慰 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏蠈蟼 蟺慰位喂蟿喂蟽渭蠈蟼.

听听Karlo Ressler (PPE). 鈥� Po拧tovani predsjedavaju膰i, te拧ka demografska zima jedno je od klju膷nih europskih pitanja, a, na啪alost, dugo je bila i jedno od najzanemarenijih. Upozoravao sam na demografski pad, da budemo i oko toga iskreni, na geografski neujedna膷eni demografski pad 鈥� godinama. Te拧ko je ova tema dolazila na dnevni red, pa i ovdje u Europskom parlamentu, i zato je dobro da danas imamo ovu otvorenu raspravu, i zato je dobro i da povjerenica 艩uica nastavlja s pionirskim pothvatom uspostave temelja europske demografske politike.

艩to uop膰e Europska unija ima s tim? Pa, me膽u ostalim, ili prije svega, radno sposobno stanovni拧tvo Europske unije smanjilo se u 15 proteklih godina za gotovo 10 milijuna, a o膷ekuje se i daljnji pad. Depopulacija, starenje stanovni拧tva, iseljavanje mladih i neravnomjeran razvoj regija zahtijevaju zbog toga sveobuhvatne javne politike i jo拧 odlu膷niji odgovor.

Demografski oporavak podrazumijeva ipak i vi拧e od toga 鈥� promjenu kulture s obitelji u sredi拧tu na拧eg djelovanja, uz fokus na nezamjenjivu ulogu roditelja. Teret odgoja i podizanja djeteta danas pada gotovo isklju膷ivo na njih premda cijelo dru拧tvo ima nemjerljive koristi od djece, novih 膷lanova zajednice.

Zbog toga, dame i gospodo, jasno je da svatko samostalno odlu膷uje o tome koliko 膰e djece imati. Jasno je tako膽er da migracija mo啪e kratkoro膷no pomo膰i demografskim trendovima, ali bez ve膰eg nataliteta ne膰e biti mogu膰e preokrenuti negativne demografske trendove. To ne mo啪e biti zabranjena tema i teza ovdje u Europskom parlamentu. To nije i ne mo啪e biti govor mr啪nje, nego su to 膷injenice koje moramo uzeti u obzir ako 啪elimo ozbiljnu raspravu.

听听Christophe Clergeau (S&D). 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, je vais vous dire: j鈥檈n ai un peu marre de ce d茅bat qui se limite 脿 culpabiliser les femmes et 脿 vouloir les priver de leurs droits ou 脿 renvoyer 脿 la question des migrations. Pourquoi est-ce que personne ici, 脿 part les socialistes et les 茅cologistes, ne veut parler de fertilit茅? Pourquoi est-ce que le Conseil et la Commission refusent de parler de fertilit茅? Tout simplement parce qu鈥檕n nous cache un scandale aux niveaux europ茅en et mondial.

Le scandale, c鈥檈st que la cons茅quence de la d茅gradation de l鈥檈nvironnement, c鈥檈st la baisse de la fertilit茅 des femmes et des hommes, et que c鈥檈st une des raisons majeures de la crise d茅mographique. Si vous voulez r茅gler la crise d茅mographique, il y a beaucoup de choses 脿 faire, mais attaquez-vous 脿 ces causes environnementales. R茅visez le r猫glement听REACH, luttez contre la pr茅sence des phtalates, des bisph茅nols et des PFAS partout dans notre environnement. L脿, vous aurez rendu un service 脿 l鈥橢urope, aux Europ茅ennes et aux Europ茅ens.

听听Marieke Ehlers (PfE). 鈥� Voorzitter, Nederland is bomvol. De wegen, het openbaar vervoer, de scholen, de huizenmarkt, onze zorg: overal is het druk en alles loopt vast. Het land barst uit zijn voegen. De Commissie wil de arbeidstekorten en vergrijzing niettemin aanpakken door meer migranten binnen te halen. Dit is niet alleen kortzichtig, maar simpelweg absurd. Ook migranten vergrijzen immers en migratie legt een enorme druk op onze welvaartsstaat.

Het importeren van arbeidskrachten lost niets op en maakt ons alleen maar afhankelijk van externe bevolkingsgroei. Dat is geen strategie, maar een valkuil; een soort piramidespel dat wordt gespeeld ten koste van onze welvaartsstaat, onze veiligheid en onze cultuur. De oplossing ligt dus niet in het binnenhalen van meer migranten, maar in het versterken van onze eigen samenleving door onze welvaart en grenzen te beschermen en te investeren in innovatie.

听听Paolo Inselvini (ECR). 鈥� Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, ci sono momenti nei quali dobbiamo unirci per il bene comune, mettendo da parte ogni divisione, e temi sui quali 猫 fondamentale collaborare in modo lungimirante.

La crisi demografica ci chiede responsabilit脿. Il calo delle nascite rappresenta il pericolo pi霉 grande e stiamo gi脿 vivendo gravi conseguenze da un punto di vista economico, sociale e culturale. Stiamo morendo, persi nelle politiche ideologiche che stanno mettendo in ginocchio l'Europa, senza accorgerci che per risolvere tanti dei nostri problemi dovremmo concentrarci su questo: far nascere nuovi europei.

Invertire la rotta 猫 possibile. Dobbiamo avere coraggio, come sta facendo 鈥� permettetemi 鈥� il governo italiano. Abbiamo appena creato l'intergruppo per la demografia per dare questo segnale, sperando di contribuire in modo significativo.

Ai fini dell'equilibrio di bilancio, per esempio, dobbiamo considerare come investimenti le spese dirette all'incremento delle nascite. D'altronde, quale investimento pi霉 giusto e bello, se non quello nelle persone? Quale migliore infrastruttura, se non la speranza nel futuro che danno i bambini, la speranza che d脿 la vita?

(L'oratore accetta di rispondere a una domanda "cartellino blu")

听听Raquel Garc铆a Hermida-Van Der Walle (Renew), blue-card question. 鈥� I'm happy to hear about the initiatives in the field of demography of the Italian Government. I think that that all governments should, should consider this subject very seriously. The Dutch Government has done so as well.

But I was wondering, given that immigration into Italy was at an all time high last year, how do you combine that with the ideas that you just presented?

听听Paolo Inselvini (ECR), risposta a una domanda "cartellino blu". 鈥� Noi, come governo italiano, stiamo da un lato lavorando sulla natalit脿, fornendo servizi per l'infanzia e facilitazioni fiscali, e stiamo lavorando per favorire il fatto che i giovani possono avere una casa propria; dall'altro lato, non crediamo che la soluzione alla crisi demografica sia l'immigrazione, e quindi stiamo cercando di combattere l'immigrazione illegale, perch茅 questa non 猫 la soluzione, anzi, 猫 la soluzione per far morire pi霉 persone in mare.

Perci貌, crediamo che, per conciliare la demografia e le politiche in favore della demografia con la lotta all'immigrazione, il governo italiano stia facendo tutto ci貌 che pu貌. Anzi, sta portando avanti le politiche migliori a livello europeo.

听听Jagna Marczu艂ajtis-Walczak (PPE). 鈥� Panie Przewodnicz膮cy! Szanowna Pani Komisarz, bardzo dzi臋kuj臋 za Pani sprawozdanie ze stanu wdro偶enia narz臋dzi demograficznych w pa艅stwach cz艂onkowskich Unii Europejskiej w roku 2023. Mamy ju偶 stycze艅 2025, has艂em polskiej prezydencji jest 鈥濨ezpiecze艅stwo, Europo鈥�. Ja to has艂o odnios臋 r贸wnie偶 do demografii. Faktycznym wsparciem europejskiej demografii jest systemowe podej艣cie do macierzy艅stwa, tak, by kobiety decyduj膮c si臋 na pierwsze czy kolejne dziecko, czu艂y si臋 bezpiecznie, wiedzia艂y, 偶e maj膮 gwarancj臋 powrotu do pracy, maj膮 dost臋pn膮 opiek臋 dla ma艂ego dziecka w swojej najbli偶szej okolicy. A je艣li dziecko urodzi si臋 z niepe艂nosprawno艣ciami, to r贸wnie偶 b臋d膮 mia艂y wsparcie dla niego i swoich rodzin, niezale偶nie od tego, sk膮d pochodz膮 i gdzie mieszkaj膮.

Dlatego apeluj臋 do Komisji Europejskiej i do rz膮d贸w pa艅stw cz艂onkowskich o wsp贸lne dzia艂ania i wsp贸艂prac臋, kt贸re s膮 kluczowe, by systemowo zapewni膰 kobietom bezpiecze艅stwo socjalne. Wasze wsp贸lne dzia艂anie i wsp贸艂praca s膮 kluczowe, by systemowo zapewni膰 kobietom w Europie wi臋ksze bezpiecze艅stwo i wspiera膰 je w macierzy艅stwie.

听听Rosa Serrano Sierra (S&D). 鈥� Se帽or presidente, el declive demogr谩fico es una de las mayores amenazas a la prosperidad de la Uni贸n Europea. La tendencia de envejecimiento en Europa hace imprescindible que se tenga en cuenta la dimensi贸n territorial de los cambios demogr谩ficos. El 80听% del territorio europeo es rural, pero solamente lo habita el 30听% de la poblaci贸n. Por eso, hablar de declive demogr谩fico es hablar de pol铆ticas de natalidad, pero tambi茅n es de dar recursos a los ciudadanos para que puedan desarrollar una vida plena, en sus or铆genes, en sus territorios.

Esta herramienta es un buen comienzo, comisaria, pero hace falta ambici贸n. Necesitamos una pol铆tica de cohesi贸n que tenga en cuenta indicadores como el reto demogr谩fico y, tambi茅n, es importante rechazar los discursos de odio. Entendamos, de una vez por todas, que la migraci贸n es cuesti贸n de solidaridad y de dignidad y que en un contexto de declive demogr谩fico tambi茅n puede ser una oportunidad para canalizar esa migraci贸n laboral tan necesaria en los sectores econ贸micos de la Uni贸n Europea.

听听Elisabeth Dieringer (PfE). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, sehr geehrte Damen und Herren! Die vorliegende Demography Toolbox l盲sst viele Fragen offen und gibt auch ganz viele nur vage Formulierungen. Dieser Ansatz 眉berbewertet administrative L枚sungen, anstatt sich mit den grundlegenden strukturellen Problemen auseinanderzusetzen. Die eigentlichen Ursachen der demografischen Krise wie wirtschaftliche Unsicherheit und mangelnde Zukunftsperspektiven f眉r junge Menschen werden nicht ausreichend adressiert. Auch die Bedeutung des klassischen Familienbildes f眉r die gesellschaftliche Stabilit盲t wird nicht angemessen ber眉cksichtigt. Gezielte Anreize zur Steigerung der Geburtenrate und finanzielle Unterst眉tzung f眉r Familien mit mehreren Kindern fehlen weitgehend. Und wie viele meiner Vorredner sehe ich auch nicht die L枚sung in der Zuwanderung, und ohne dabei nur in eine Richtung zu zeigen, sondern es kamen auch听鈥� wenn Sie zugeh枚rt haben 鈥� Wortmeldungen aus anderen Richtungen. Ja, die Strategie greift potenziell in Bereiche ein, die traditionell in der Kompetenz der Mitgliedstaaten liegen, wie Familienpolitik und Sozialgesetzgebung. Diese Bevormundung lehnen wir strikt ab. Wir ben枚tigen dringend einen ganzheitlicheren und mutigeren Ansatz, der die Komplexit盲t der demografischen Herausforderungen Europas wirklich erfasst und angeht.