合法博彩网站

PR脡SIDENCE: YOUNOUS OMARJEE
痴颈肠别-笔谤茅蝉颈诲别苍迟

(La s茅ance est ouverte 脿 09h01)

听听Le Pr茅sident. 鈥� L'ordre du jour appelle la d茅claration de la Commission 鈥撎齃utte contre la听d茅sertification: 16e听session de la Conf茅rence des parties听(COP16) de la Convention des Nations unies (). J'ai le plaisir d'accueillir Madame la Commissaire Jessika听Roswall, 脿 qui je donne imm茅diatement la parole.

听听Jessika Roswall, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Mr President, honourable Members, healthy soils are fundamental for our collective future. Without rich and fertile soils, we have no food and many farmers have their livelihoods affected. We must pay more attention to combating land degradation and enhancing drought resilience for our economy and for our security.

Europe is not immune to these issues. One of our key political priorities for the coming mandate, the new water resilience strategy, comes from the realisation that our European and global waters are under unsustainable pressure. At the same time, our Joint Research Centre Soil Observatory notes that at least 62听% of EU soils are affected by degradation.

Droughts have substantial impacts on nearly all regions of the EU. This is why I travelled to Riyadh for the opening of the desertification COP16 on my first day as European Commissioner. I wanted to send a strong signal of the EU's clear commitment to multilateralism and to cooperation with international partners on our key environmental challenges.

The desertification COP followed the two meetings of the climate and biodiversity COPs. The day before it started, countries failed to agree on a global treaty on plastic pollution. On desertification, despite the EU's strong engagement, we reached a mixed result in Riyadh. Parties were not able to reach a compromise on the main topic on the agenda 鈥� an instrument to address droughts. It is disappointing that we cannot bridge our differences and reach consensus on such critical issues.

We were also disappointed in the outcome on gender and civil society organisations. The participation of these organisations increases transparency and democratic accountability. Their contribution is essential. However, some countries increasingly challenge the role and contributions of civil society organisations.

Finally, we were disappointed that the parties were reluctant to embrace synergies across the three Rio Conventions on desertification, climate and biodiversity.

However, we did also make progress on several fronts, and every bit of multilateral success is worth celebrating. We reached an agreement on establishing the Science-Policy Interface as a permanent body. We also adopted decisions on land tenure, on migration related to desertification, land degradation and droughts, and on avoiding, reducing and reversing degradation on agricultural land. It was the first time in the history of the Convention that agricultural land degradation was addressed. We must look at sustainable agricultural practices and healthy land together.

Finally, after a 10鈥憏ear freeze, the parties agreed to increase the core budget of the Convention. This is an important step to ensure that global challenges like desertification, drought and water scarcity are properly addressed in the multilateral agenda.

The EU is contributing to the concrete implementation of the Convention, particularly through our continued support for the Great Green Wall, an inspiring UNCCD flagship initiative that the EU is proud to champion. Building on this commitment, the EU has launched the second phase of the UN World Restoration Flagship, Regreening Africa, which is a key contribution to the Green Wall Initiative.

Honourable Members, the EU and its Member States will need to step up efforts to protect our values and implement international commitments in the UNCCD and within the EU. In this regard, I am happy to report that the Commission is responding to the commitments of the European Court of Auditors by developing a methodology to assess land degradation and certification for the EU. This will require careful preparation and strategic alliances. We need to address land use, climate change, biodiversity loss, water scarcity and pollution in a coherent manner.

Honourable Members, these are reflections from my first ever COP, and I am convinced that this COP on desertification needs to be more central. We also cannot look at the outcome of Riyadh without acknowledging that international negotiations have become more difficult, more complex and interconnected when the world is facing several ecological crises. Biodiversity, climate, food, water and energy challenges are all interconnected with land use.

I'm now looking forward to hearing your views.

听听Carmen Crespo D铆az, en nombre del Grupo PPE. 鈥� Se帽or presidente, se帽ora comisaria, gracias por el empuje al tema del agua desde la nueva Comisi贸n. Creemos que es fundamental. Yo soy de una tierra des茅rtica, al lado del desierto de Europa de Tabernas, y all铆 se demuestra con la huerta de Europa 鈥攑orque el 80听% del producto de frutas y hortalizas se exporta desde all铆 鈥攓ue es posible abordar esta cuesti贸n. 驴Por qu茅? Porque hay veinte veces menor huella h铆drica en todos los productos agroalimentarios.

Ese es el gran milagro: que para las infraestructuras hidr谩ulicas se utilicen los fondos Next Generation, el Banco Europeo de Inversiones y se creen infraestructuras donde la ciencia, con todo lo que se est谩 investigando, permita. Creo en estos momentos que es fundamental prestar atenci贸n a todas las fuentes h铆dricas: todas son necesarias, algunas en prevenci贸n y otras adecuadas a las cuestiones agrarias. Creo que es important铆sima la econom铆a circular, y las aguas residuales nos dan una oportunidad en Europa de tener agua regenerada, que incluso podemos inyectar a nuestra hucha del futuro, que son, en este caso, todas las aguas subterr谩neas.

Por ello, creo que se puede hacer, que tenemos la obligaci贸n de hacerlo y que, adem谩s, en este momento, los pa铆ses como Espa帽a, como el m铆o, deber铆an trabajar en estas infraestructuras hidr谩ulicas de prevenci贸n 鈥攖ambi茅n adaptadas a lo que es el tema agrario鈥� y, por supuesto, bajar los impuestos, el IVA de los alimentos, que la rebaja no se ha prorrogado en este momento en ese decreto trampa que ayer llevaron al Congreso de los Diputados. Creo que es fundamental la seguridad alimentaria y, para conseguirla, tenemos que trabajar en las infraestructuras hidr谩ulicas, como la nueva Comisi贸n y la nueva comisaria est谩n haciendo en este momento en Europa.

听听Marta Temido, em nome do Grupo S&D. 鈥� Senhor Presidente, Senhora Comiss谩ria, Caros Colegas, a desertifica莽茫o e a degrada莽茫o dos solos, tal como as altera莽玫es clim谩ticas, s茫o uma realidade que p玫e em causa os direitos humanos mais b谩sicos, como o direito 脿 alimenta莽茫o ou o direito ao acesso 脿 谩gua limpa e segura. Atingem, em especial, as comunidades mais vulner谩veis, as mulheres, as crian莽as, os povos ind铆genas, mas, potencialmente, v茫o atingir-nos a todos.

E a COP 16, que decorreu em Riade no passado m锚s de dezembro, refor莽ou a urg锚ncia do combate a estes fen贸menos, atrav茅s da intensifica莽茫o da colabora莽茫o internacional e de uma abordagem integrada. A Uni茫o Europeia reafirmou o seu compromisso com a meta global de neutralidade da degrada莽茫o da terra e o empenho em atingir este objetivo at茅 2030, atrav茅s de incentivos aos Estados-Membros para que adotem pol铆ticas que favore莽am a restaura莽茫o das terras e a implementa莽茫o de pr谩ticas agr铆colas sustent谩veis.

Por isso, a Uni茫o Europeia tem de continuar a incentivar a ado莽茫o destas pr谩ticas agr铆colas regenerativas, que respeitem os ecossistemas naturais e contribuam para a restaura莽茫o de solos degradados, e deve bater-se pela implementa莽茫o da Lei do Restauro da Natureza. Mas a inclus茫o da sociedade civil e do setor privado neste combate s茫o essenciais, e isso exige iniciativas de apoio.

Quero referir, aqui, uma iniciativa da sociedade civil do meu pa铆s, Portugal, que exemplifica bem esta luta que precisamos de levar a cabo com ela. E 茅 a iniciativa Pr贸-Montado Alentejo, um projeto que visa promover a constru莽茫o de uma barreira florestal ativa na regi茫o sul de Portugal, baseada no montado de sobreiro e azinheira, com o objetivo de mitigar os efeitos das altera莽玫es clim谩ticas, combater a desertifica莽茫o, proteger a diversidade e, enfim, combater o despovoamento.

听听Julien Leonardelli, au nom du groupe PfE. 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, la COP16 a 茅t茅, sans aucun doute, la plus grande r茅union d'脡tats 脿 ce jour sur le sujet de la d茅sertification. Elle se tenait 脿 Riyad, ce qui a permis aux participants de constater 脿 quel point ce probl猫me bouleverse des puissances r茅gionales qui reposaient autrefois sur l'agriculture, comme l'脡thiopie ou l'脡gypte. Ce v茅ritable fl茅au est aujourd'hui 脿 nos portes. On l'observe d茅j脿 en Gr猫ce, en Italie, mais aussi dans ma r茅gion au sud de la France, en Occitanie, o霉 l'eau courante des habitants est d茅sormais rationn茅e en 茅t茅, lors des canicules, o霉 les agriculteurs ne peuvent pas toujours arroser leurs cultures et o霉 les feux de for锚t se font de plus en plus fr茅quents.

Aujourd'hui, le temps n'est plus aux belles intentions et aux fausses promesses, mais au changement. Les Europ茅ens touch茅s par l'artificialisation des sols et la s茅cheresse m茅ritent mieux que les 芒nonnements suffisants de ceux qui se tiennent dans des tours de verre et de b茅ton. Pour r茅pondre 脿 ce d茅fi, il faut privil茅gier les circuits courts, r茅duire le libre-茅change d茅brid茅 qui pollue notre air et nos oc茅ans et se tourner vers l'innovation et la recherche, 脿 l'image des pays du Golfe. Ne restons pas spectateurs, soyons les acteurs de notre salut avant qu'il ne soit trop tard.

听听Francesco Ventola, a nome del gruppo ECR. 鈥� Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, dal rapporto COP16 la desertificazione e la siccit脿 rappresentano non solo emergenze ambientali, ma anche minacce sociali ed economiche per intere regioni.

I dati forniti sottolineano che oltre il 40听% delle terre globali 猫 degradato e che la siccit脿 provoca perdite economiche annuali che superano i 300听miliardi. In Italia, questo si traduce in una crisi che colpisce soprattutto il comparto agricolo.

Si rende sempre pi霉 necessaria e indispensabile la realizzazione di infrastrutture che ottimizzino il sistema di raccolta, conservazione e distribuzione della risorsa acqua. 脠 necessario investire in impianti di riuso delle acque reflue. Nessuna goccia deve essere dispersa: non ce lo possiamo permettere.

Non possiamo pi霉 accettare false politiche ambientali ideologizzate, che bloccano sui territori la realizzazione di progetti innovativi e realmente sostenibili. Bisogna intraprendere tutte le strade che la scienza e la tecnologia ci offrono per fronteggiare il rischio desertificazione.

Cari colleghi, non limitiamoci solo a parlare dei problemi: agiamo per risolverli e facciamolo con determinazione, per il bene dei nostri territori, dell'Europa e delle generazioni future.

听听Martin Hojs铆k, za skupinu Renew. 鈥� V谩啪en媒 p谩n predsedaj煤ci, v谩啪en谩 pani komis谩rka, v谩啪en茅 kolegyne, v谩啪en铆 kolegovia, aj ke膹 sa takpovediac symbolicky konferencia dohody OSN o dezertifik谩cii konala v Saudskej Ar谩bii uprostred p煤拧te, nie je to t茅ma, ktor谩 sa t媒ka len Arabsk茅ho polostrova a Afriky. Je to t茅ma, ktor谩 sa ve木mi bytostne t媒ka aj n谩s v Eur贸pe. Dezertifik谩cia je ka啪dodenn媒m probl茅mom na Cypre, v 艩panielsku, v Taliansku, ale aj uprostred Eur贸py. U n谩s doma na Slovensku ka啪d媒m rokom vid铆me v盲膷拧铆 a v盲膷拧铆 podiel p么dy, ktor煤 u啪 farm谩ri nedok谩啪u obhospodarova钮, ktor谩 sa n谩m str谩ca takpovediac priamo pred o膷ami, preto啪e sa vysu拧uje. O tom je dezertifik谩cia. Sucho a nedostatok vody sa stali fenom茅nom na拧ej doby a ke膹 pr铆du, tak pr铆du ako z谩plavy. Klimatick谩 kr铆za sa men铆 na klimatick煤 katastrofu. Ni膷铆me biodiverzitu a men铆me krajinu v p煤拧钮. V niektor媒ch 膷astiach Slovenska farm谩ri pri拧li a啪 o 40 % svojich v媒nosov kv么li dezertifik谩cii. Tak媒 obrovsk媒 to je probl茅m. Preto ako spravodajca Eur贸pskeho parlamentu pre z谩kon o p么de, naozaj v谩s chcem vyzva钮, aby ste ho podporili. D煤fam, 啪e sa n谩m spolu s Komisiou a Radou podar铆 dosiahnu钮 膷oskoro v trial贸gu dohodu. Z谩kladom je ma钮 kvalitn茅 inform谩cie. V Rij谩de sa dohodla medzin谩rodn谩 platforma. V Eur贸pe tak煤 nem谩me, z谩kon o p么de ju vie poskytn煤钮.

听听P盲r Holmgren, f枚r Verts/ALE gruppen. 鈥� Herr talman! Kommission盲r Roswall! Klimatf枚r盲ndringarna handlar verkligen inte bara om att det blir varmare p氓 planeten, utan ett mycket st枚rre hot i stora delar av v盲rlden 盲r f枚r盲ndringarna i nederb枚rdsklimatet. Det blir mer nederb枚rd, kraftigare nederb枚rd p氓 de platser d盲r vi redan har mycket vatten. Men framf枚r allt, i det h盲r sammanhang som vi diskuterar nu, p氓 m氓nga platser, inte minst d盲r vi har en stor del av m盲nskligheten, d盲r vi har en stor del av jordbruk och matproduktion, blir det nu sakta men s盲kert torrare.

Det 盲r ett enormt stort akut hot mot oss och v氓r matproduktion. Det h盲r g盲ller inte bara andra delar av v盲rlden, det g盲ller h盲r hemma i Europa ocks氓. Vi ser delar av framf枚r allt Sydeuropa, hur sk枚rdar av till exempel majs och vete redan har sjunkit med storleksordningen 60听%.

Vi vet ocks氓 att det torrare klimatet, det torrare, lokala och regionala klimatet, medf枚r en massa riskkonsekvenser. Till exempel de f枚rskr盲ckliga 枚versv盲mningar som vi s氓g i Valencia senast f枚rv盲rrades s氓 mycket av att marken d盲r f枚rst hade blivit s氓 torr och h氓rd att den inte kunde ta emot vatten.

Som kommission盲r Roswall konstaterade: P氓 COP16, visst i vissa steg, i vissa sammanhang tog vi steg fram氓t, men som ofta i s氓dana h盲r sammanhang var det lite blandade resultat. Det st枚rsta problemet 盲r att vi 氓terigen misslyckades med att f氓 ett bindande globalt ramverk n盲r det g盲ller att bek盲mpa torka.

Hade ansvariga politiker redan i slutet p氓 1900鈥憈alet tagit h盲nsyn till den forskning som fanns d氓 hade vi f枚rhoppningsvis inte varit d盲r vi 盲r nu.听Men nu 盲r vi d盲r vi 盲r, och det inneb盲r att vi, inte minst h盲r i EU, m氓ste h枚ja ambitionerna, b氓de n盲r det g盲ller att minska utsl盲ppen och arbeta 盲nnu mer aktivt med klimatanpassning.

听听Catarina Martins, em nome do Grupo The Left. 鈥� Senhor Presidente, nos pr贸ximos 25 anos, tr锚s em cada quatro pessoas ser谩 afetada pela seca a n铆vel mundial. 脡 uma cat谩strofe e est谩 aqui. A Europa est谩 a aquecer mais r谩pido do que o resto do mundo e a seca prolongada chegou d茅cadas antes do que estava previsto.

Por isso mesmo, e apesar do veto dos Estados Unidos e do Jap茫o a um acordo para um regime global de resili锚ncia 脿 seca, a Uni茫o Europeia n茫o pode desistir desse objetivo e deve agir a todos os n铆veis.

Venho de um pa铆s, Portugal, onde a agricultura superintensiva condena boa parte da popula莽茫o alentejana e algarvia, incluindo os pequenos agricultores, a uma vida sem 谩gua. O que produzem n茫o alimenta essas popula莽玫es nem deixa riqueza no pa铆s. Tudo 茅 exportado, incluindo os lucros. Por l谩, ficam s贸 os solos degradados.

Por isso, bem sei que esta n茫o 茅 a luta da ecologia contra a agricultura, 茅 a das nossas vidas, incluindo a produ莽茫o alimentar, contra a voragem das multinacionais do agroneg贸cio. E por isso, Senhora Comiss谩ria, vai ser mesmo preciso coragem para enfrentar alguns dos mais poderosos interesses econ贸micos.

听听Zsuzsanna Borvend茅g, a ESN k茅pvisel艖csoport nev茅ben. 鈥� Tisztelt Eln枚k 脷r! Magyarorsz谩g term艖f枚ldjei az emberi tev茅kenys茅g miatt sz谩radnak ki. A K谩rp谩t-medence term茅szetes v铆zh谩ztart谩sa elegend艖 vizet biztos铆tana, ha a t谩jnak megfelel艖 m贸don gazd谩lkodn谩nk.

De ma mindent a profit茅hs茅g hat谩roz meg, amely kizs谩km谩nyolja a k枚rnyezetet. 脕rtereink hely茅n z枚ldhas煤t term艖 sz谩nt贸f枚ldek vannak. Hagyjuk, hogy a foly贸k 谩tv谩gtassanak az orsz谩gon, ahelyett, hogy 谩titatn谩k a talajt az 茅ltet艖 v铆zzel.

Az uni贸s d枚nt茅shozatal a kl铆mav谩ls谩g kapcs谩n a leveg艖 枚sszet茅tel茅re f贸kusz谩l, 茅s erre hivatkozva betarthatatlan emisszi贸s szab谩lyokat alkot, de az ennek 茅rdek茅ben haszn谩lt 煤j technol贸gi谩k a talaj 茅s a talajvizek elszennyez艖d茅s茅t fokozz谩k.

Magyarorsz谩gon az asz谩llyal p谩rhuzamosan az akkumul谩torgy谩rak v铆zszennyez艖 hat谩s谩val is sz谩molni kell, vagyis n谩lunk is a gazdas谩gi lobbik 铆rj谩k fel眉l a k枚rnyezetv茅delmet.

A F枚ld egy komplex rendszer, amely komplex v谩laszokat ig茅nyel, nem lehet kiragadni egyes probl茅m谩kat. Ha val贸s megold谩sokat akarunk, akkor a lokalit谩s fel茅 kell mozdulnunk, 茅s uni贸s forr谩sokb贸l is a helyi saj谩toss谩goknak megfelel艖 term茅szetk枚zeli megold谩sokat kell t谩mogatnunk.

听听Christine Schneider (PPE). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, Frau Kommissarin, meine sehr geehrten Damen und Herren! W眉stenbildung ist eine globale Herausforderung, und Europa ist immer st盲rker betroffen. Unsere Ern盲hrungssicherheit, die wir lange f眉r selbstverst盲ndlich hielten, ist bedroht. Eine L枚sung kann nur mit und nicht gegen unsere Landwirtinnen und Landwirte gefunden werden. Was passiert, wenn wir 眉ber ihre K枚pfe hinweg entscheiden, das haben die letzten Jahre gezeigt. Bauernproteste sind zwischenzeitlich vor diesem Haus zum Alltag geworden. Daher mein dringender Appell: Beziehen Sie von Anfang an den Berufsstand mit ein, insbesondere bei der angek眉ndigten Water Resilience Strategy.

Drei Aspekte m枚chte ich hervorheben: Wir brauchen erstens ein intelligentes Wassermanagement. Nutzen wir die k眉nstliche Intelligenz, um Wasserressourcen effizient zu verteilen. Setzen wir auf Wiederverwendung von Grauwasser und Abwasser, und bauen wir wassersparende Infrastruktur aus. So k枚nnen wir Wasser nachhaltig zwischen den Regionen und Sektoren nutzen. Zweitens: d眉rreresistentes Saatgut. Es ist unverzichtbar, um Ertr盲ge selbst unter extremen Klimabedingungen zu sichern. Dazu brauchen wir neue Z眉chtungstechnologien, und die Blockade im Rat muss beendet werden. Drittens: Innovative Bew盲sserungsl枚sungen, Tr枚pfchen- und Pr盲zisionsbew盲sserung nutzen Sensorendaten, setzen Wasser ganz gezielt ein und vermeiden dadurch Verluste. Diese Technologien m眉ssen wir st盲rker f枚rdern, um unsere Landwirtschaft noch effizienter und nachhaltiger zu machen.

Kurz zusammengefasst: Wenn wir Ern盲hrungssicherheit wollen, brauchen wir neue Technologien und innovative L枚sungen in enger Zusammenarbeit mit unseren internationalen Partnern, mit unseren Landwirten, aber auch mit uns Verbraucherinnen und Verbrauchern.

听听危维魏畏蟼 螒蟻谓伪慰蠉蟿慰纬位慰蠀 (S&D). 鈥� 螝蠉蟻喂蔚 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 畏 螕畏 渭伪蟼, 蟺畏纬萎 味蠅萎蟼 纬喂伪 伪喂蠋谓蔚蟼, 伪谓蟿喂渭蔚蟿蠅蟺委味蔚喂 蟿慰谓 魏委谓未蠀谓慰 谓伪 渭蔚蟿伪蟿蟻伪蟺蔚委 蟽蔚 蟺畏纬萎 伪蠁伪谓喂蟽渭慰蠉. 螣蠁蔚委位慰蠀渭蔚 谓伪 伪蟺慰蟿蟻苇蠄慰蠀渭蔚 蟿畏 渭蔚蟿伪蟿蟻慰蟺萎 蔚蠉蠁慰蟻蠅谓 蟺蔚蟻喂慰蠂蠋谓 蟽蔚 蔚蟻畏渭蠅渭苇谓伪 蟿慰蟺委伪. 螌蟿伪谓 蟿慰 苇未伪蠁慰蟼 魏伪蟿伪蟽蟿蟻苇蠁蔚蟿伪喂, 未喂伪魏蠀尾蔚蠉蔚蟿伪喂 蟿慰 渭苇位位慰谓 蟿畏蟼 伪谓胃蟻蠅蟺蠈蟿畏蟿伪蟼. 螚 味蠅萎 未蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 蔚蠀未慰魏喂渭萎蟽蔚喂 蟽蔚 魏伪渭苇谓畏 纬畏.

螚 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 螆谓蠅蟽畏 魏伪位蔚委蟿伪喂 谓伪 伪谓伪位维尾蔚喂 畏纬蔚蟿喂魏蠈 蟻蠈位慰, 未喂伪魏畏蟻蠉蟽蟽慰谓蟿伪蟼 蟿畏谓 伪谓维纬魏畏 纬喂伪 慰蟻胃慰位慰纬喂魏萎 未喂伪蠂蔚委蟻喂蟽畏 蟿蠅谓 蠁蠀蟽喂魏蠋谓 蟺蠈蟻蠅谓 魏伪喂 蟿蔚蟻渭伪蟿喂蟽渭蠈 蔚蟺喂蟿苇位慰蠀蟼 蟿畏蟼 伪未蟻维谓蔚喂伪蟼. 螚 蟽蠀谓苇蠂喂蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 蟺伪蟻慰蠉蟽伪蟼 蟺慰蟻蔚委伪蟼 胃伪 慰未畏纬萎蟽蔚喂 蟽蟿畏 蟽蠀纬魏慰渭喂未萎 蟿蠅谓 蟽蠀谓蔚蟺蔚喂蠋谓 蟿畏蟼 伪未喂伪蠁慰蟻委伪蟼 渭伪蟼 魏伪喂 蠈蠂喂 蟿蠅谓 魏伪蟻蟺蠋谓 蟿畏蟼 纬畏蟼.

螤蟻慰蟿蔚委谓蠅 蟿畏 蟽蠉谓伪蠄畏 蔚谓蠈蟼 危蠀渭蠁蠋谓慰蠀 纬喂伪 螙蠅谓蟿伪谓萎 螕畏, 渭喂伪 蟽蠀渭蠁蠅谓委伪 蟺慰蠀 胃伪 蟺蟻慰尾位苇蟺蔚喂 蟿畏谓 伪谓蟿喂蟽蟿维胃渭喂蟽畏 魏维胃蔚 蠂伪渭苇谓畏蟼 苇魏蟿伪蟽畏蟼 渭蔚 蟿畏谓 伪谓伪纬苇谓谓畏蟽畏 未喂蟺位维蟽喂伪蟼 苇魏蟿伪蟽畏蟼 渭苇蟽蠅 尾喂蠋蟽喂渭蠅谓 蔚蟺蔚谓未蠉蟽蔚蠅谓. 螠喂伪 蟿苇蟿慰喂伪 蟺蟻蠅蟿慰尾慰蠀位委伪 胃伪 渭蟺慰蟻慰蠉蟽蔚 谓伪 伪蟺慰蟿蔚位苇蟽蔚喂 苇谓伪 谓苇慰 蟺伪纬魏蠈蟽渭喂慰 蟺蟻蠈蟿蠀蟺慰 纬喂伪 蟿畏 尾喂蠋蟽喂渭畏 未喂伪蠂蔚委蟻喂蟽畏 蟿蠅谓 蔚未伪蠁蠋谓. 螖蔚谓 蟺蟻蠈魏蔚喂蟿伪喂 纬喂伪 渭喂伪 慰蠀蟿慰蟺喂魏萎 喂未苇伪, 伪位位维 纬喂伪 渭喂伪 蔚蟺喂蟿伪魏蟿喂魏萎 伪谓维纬魏畏. 螤伪蟻维 蟿喂蟼 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺维胃蔚喂蔚蟼 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 蟺蟻慰蟽蟿伪蟽委伪 蟿慰蠀 蟺位伪谓萎蟿畏, 蟺伪蟻伪蟿畏蟻慰蠉渭蔚 蟿畏谓 蔚蟽蟿委伪蟽畏 慰蟻喂蟽渭苇谓蠅谓 蟽蟿畏谓 蔚尉蔚蟻蔚蠉谓畏蟽畏 未喂伪蟽蟿畏渭喂魏蠋谓 蟺蟻慰慰蟻喂蟽渭蠋谓, 蟺伪蟻伪尾位苇蟺慰谓蟿伪蟼 蟿畏谓 伪谓维纬魏畏 纬喂伪 维渭蔚蟽畏 未蟻维蟽畏 蟽蟿畏 螕畏. 桅伪委谓蔚蟿伪喂 谓伪 蟺蟻慰魏蟻委谓蔚蟿伪喂 畏 魏伪蟿维魏蟿畏蟽畏 蔚谓蠈蟼 伪蟺慰渭伪魏蟻蠀蟽渭苇谓慰蠀 魏蠈魏魏喂谓慰蠀 蟺位伪谓萎蟿畏 蔚喂蟼 尾维蟻慰蟼 蟿畏蟼 未喂伪蠁蠉位伪尉畏蟼 蟿慰蠀 蟺蟻维蟽喂谓慰蠀 蟺位伪谓萎蟿畏 渭伪蟼.

螘蟺喂蟺位苇慰谓, 未喂伪蟺喂蟽蟿蠋谓蔚蟿伪喂 畏 蔚谓委蟽蠂蠀蟽畏 蟻畏蟿慰蟻喂魏蠋谓 蟺慰蠀 伪渭蠁喂蟽尾畏蟿慰蠉谓 蟿畏谓 魏蟻喂蟽喂渭蠈蟿畏蟿伪 蟿畏蟼 魏伪蟿维蟽蟿伪蟽畏蟼, 蠀蟺慰尾伪胃渭委味慰谓蟿伪蟼 蟿喂蟼 蟺蔚蟻喂尾伪位位慰谓蟿喂魏苇蟼 蟺蟻慰魏位萎蟽蔚喂蟼 蟽蔚 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏维 蟺伪喂蠂谓委未喂伪. 螚 蠁蠉蟽畏 渭维蟼 伪蟺蔚蠀胃蠉谓蔚喂 蔚蟺蔚委纬慰蠀蟽伪 苇魏魏位畏蟽畏. 螒蟼 蟿畏谓 伪蠁慰蠀纬魏蟻伪蟽蟿慰蠉渭蔚, 蟺蟻喂谓 畏 蟽喂蠅蟺萎 蟿畏蟼 纬委谓蔚喂 蟺喂慰 蔚魏魏蠅蠁伪谓蟿喂魏萎 伪蟺蠈 慰蟺慰喂伪未萎蟺慰蟿蔚 蠁蠅谓萎. 螣 蠂蟻蠈谓慰蟼 纬喂伪 未蟻维蟽畏 蔚委谓伪喂 蟿蠋蟻伪. 螝伪喂 蟽蔚 蠈蟽慰蠀蟼 伪谓伪味畏蟿慰蠉谓 魏伪蟿伪蠁蠉纬喂慰 蟽蔚 维位位慰蠀蟼 蟺位伪谓萎蟿蔚蟼, 伪蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼 蠀蟺蔚谓胃蠀渭委蟽慰蠀渭蔚 蠈蟿喂 蔚魏蔚委 慰喂 蟽蠀谓胃萎魏蔚蟼 蔚委谓伪喂 萎未畏 蔚蟻畏渭喂魏苇蟼 魏伪喂 胃伪 苇蟻胃蔚喂 畏 蔚蟻畏渭慰蟺慰委畏蟽畏 魏伪喂 蟽蟿慰谓 蟺位伪谓萎蟿畏 渭伪蟼, 伪谓 伪蠀蟿蠈 蔚蟺喂味畏蟿慰蠉谓.

听听Mireia Borr谩s Pab贸n (PfE). 鈥� Se帽or presidente, se帽ora comisaria, se帽or铆as, voy a ser muy clara: la CP16 ha sido otro espect谩culo bochornoso de hipocres铆a, con l铆deres mundiales que vuelan en sus jets privados a Arabia Saud铆; un pa铆s, por cierto, que incumple el 75听% de las restricciones medioambientales que ustedes desde aqu铆, desde Bruselas, imponen sin piedad a nuestros agricultores. S铆, aquellos mismos que evitan la desertificaci贸n del territorio. 驴Y qu茅 resultados hemos obtenido? Ninguno, ning煤n compromiso vinculante.

Nos enfrentamos a un gran problema, se帽ora comisaria: casi el 70听% de las tierras agr铆colas mediterr谩neas est谩n en riesgo de desertificaci贸n y solo en Espa帽a 鈥攅n mi pa铆s鈥� dos听millones de hect谩reas ya est谩n clasificadas como des茅rticas. 驴Y qu茅 hace la Comisi贸n al respecto? Lo de siempre: culpabilizar al cambio clim谩tico. Pero 驴se han planteado, por un momento, que el principal problema fuera, por ejemplo, la falta de inversi贸n en infraestructuras h铆dricas? En Europa se pierden millones de toneladas de agua de riego debido a infraestructuras h铆dricas que est谩n tremendamente anticuadas.

Miremos a Israel 鈥攗n pa铆s que tiene recursos h铆dricos muy escasos y condiciones casi des茅rticas鈥�, que ha revolucionado su agricultura con tecnolog铆a muy avanzada; mientras ellos aumentan su productividad un 30听%, aqu铆 en Europa nuestros agricultores se ven obligados a abandonar sus tierras. Desde Vox ya seguimos en esta l铆nea y propusimos un plan: un gran Plan Hidrol贸gico Nacional para garantizar el agua y cohesionar el territorio. 驴Y qu茅 es lo que vot贸 toda la izquierda en bloque? Un no rotundo. 驴Y qu茅 es lo que vot贸 el Partido Popular? Pues se abstuvo, como siempre, cuando le gustan nuestras iniciativas, pero tienen complejo en admitirlo.

Miremos ahora a Ja茅n: Marmolejo, Arjona, Lopera. 驴Les suenan, se帽ores del PP? Son lugares de Espa帽a donde el Partido Popular est谩 expropiando tierras cultivadas con olivos para construir masivamente plantas fotovoltaicas. 驴Les preocupa de verdad la desertificaci贸n, se帽ores del PP? 100听000听olivos a la basura, en nombre de la sostenibilidad. Empezamos a pensar que ustedes prefieren el aceite de Marruecos al aceite de Ja茅n, pero lo cierto es que no me extra帽ar铆a ver dentro de muy poco tanto al Partido Popular como a la izquierda manifest谩ndose juntos en contra de sus propias pol铆ticas, esta vez no en apoyo de las nucleares, sino en su falsa solidaridad con los agricultores de Ja茅n, tan falsa como la sostenibilidad que defienden.

听听Laurence Trochu (ECR). 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, Madame la Commissaire, mes chers coll猫gues, face aux enjeux climatiques, il est triste de voir que les solutions id茅ologiques prennent trop souvent le pas sur le bon sens. La question de la d茅sertification n'y fait pas exception et les r茅ponses apport茅es 脿 ce probl猫me, que personne ne nie d'ailleurs, sont souvent illusoires.听脌 ce titre, l'opposition f茅roce et m锚me, parfois, violente des 茅cologistes fran莽ais 脿 des solutions de bon sens telles que les m茅gabassines, qui stockent le surplus d'eau de l'hiver pour le r茅utiliser l'茅t茅, est un exemple 茅loquent.

Alors, plut么t que de voir en l'homme uniquement un pr茅dateur-pollueur, l'homme doit 锚tre la solution, par l'innovation, le progr猫s technique et la recherche. La d茅sertification ne peut 锚tre combattue par une 茅cologie punitive et normative 脿 outrance, ruineuse pour notre comp茅titivit茅, comme l'a d'ailleurs soulign茅 le rapport Draghi.

Nos agriculteurs, qui ont fa莽onn茅 nos paysages, sont las d'锚tre d茅sign茅s comme les principaux responsables et d'锚tre 茅cras茅s de normes. Dernier artefact id茅ologique, le changement climatique est aussi utilis茅 comme pr茅texte pour justifier une immigration de masse venue du Sud dont plus personne ne veut. Alors, chers coll猫gues, pour relever le d茅fi du climat, sortons enfin de l'id茅ologie.

听听Billy Kelleher (Renew). 鈥� Mr President, as I stand here, my home country of Ireland is preparing to be battered by one of the strongest storms in decades. And if you look at the weather forecasts across Europe, there's rain in many areas. So it's a concept that is very hard to understand when we sometimes speak about desertification.

But, in reality, the scale of this problem 鈥� the desertification 鈥� should be everyone's concern. It affects the land of homes to 1.5 billion people. The UN estimates that 135 million people have already been displaced due to desertification, and this could rise to 700 million by 2050. This land is also important agricultural land, and the UN estimates that 40听% of agricultural land has already been degraded.

The consequences are far-reaching: humanitarian, migration, environmental problems, food and water security, political stability or political instability, for global security, for trade and supply chains there are significant challenges. And each of these consequences will have an impact also on Europe and the daily lives of our citizens.

We cannot reverse the problems in the very short term, but we have to plan and we must make real collective efforts to halt its spread and to address its long-term implications. So while I welcome the commitments at the COP16 of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, especially regarding the financial commitments from both the public and private sector, we do need to ensure that we make a common effort to bring forward the challenges regarding drought and the protocols with regard to tackling the same.

If we are going to halt this runaway train, we need to have a common, coherent plan for tackling drought and that involves governments, businesses, local people, scientists and engineers.

听听Kai Tegethoff (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Mr听President, the summer of 2024 is the hottest on record in the EU and globally. Thirteen Member States, meaning almost 50听% of the Member States of the EU, are affected by desertification and almost 25听% of the territory is sensitive to desertification. Still, while the EU promotes the leadership role globally, we are not prepared ourselves.

The desertification COP16 failed to agree on a global drought framework, and the Commission promised to present a water resilience strategy already a year ago. I hope this will come very soon.

And Commissioner听Roswall, in your introduction, in your first sentence you said that we need to focus on helping farmers, and in the second sentence it was 'focus on economy'. I think what we really need in that water resilience strategy is water saving targets. We need to improve efficiency and reuse of water. We need to protect and restore our water supplies and the whole catchment area.

And then at the same time, considering the wildfires and the flooding that we deal with here every single plenary session, we have to make sure that this water resilience strategy is accompanied and embedded into a real European climate adaptation law.

听听Jo茫o Oliveira (The Left). 鈥� Senhor Presidente, o problema da desertifica莽茫o 茅 um problema ambiental ou clim谩tico, mas 茅 essencialmente um problema da rela莽茫o do ser humano com a natureza, 茅 um problema humano, social e econ贸mico.

As conclus玫es da COP16 cont锚m muitos dos elementos relevantes para o debate sobre o combate 脿 desertifica莽茫o, mas revelam tamb茅m as muitas dificuldades que 茅 preciso ainda superar.

H谩 muito por fazer para que haja verdadeiramente solu莽玫es, relativamente ao uso e 脿 gest茫o eficientes da 谩gua e dos recursos h铆dricos, relativamente 脿 ocupa莽茫o e ordenamento equilibrado do territ贸rio, relativamente 脿 promo莽茫o de pr谩ticas produtivas sustent谩veis, equilibradas, seja na agricultura, na pecu谩ria, na silvicultura. H谩 muito por fazer no investimento p煤blico que 茅 preciso nos territ贸rios rurais, para travar o abandono da popula莽茫o e a consequente desertifica莽茫o do territ贸rio.

Permitam-me trazer, aqui, um aspeto que 茅 relevante em Portugal, que 茅 o montado de sobreiros e azinheiras, que 茅 caracter铆stico do meu pa铆s. O montado n茫o 茅 apenas um conjunto de 谩rvores que ret锚m carbono e resistem melhor aos inc锚ndios. O montado 茅 um sistema agrosilvopastoril que tem de ser encarado como tal em todas as suas dimens玫es, n茫o apenas pelo valor ambiental, mas pelo enorme valor social que tem, porque cria emprego, fixa as popula莽玫es, permite pr谩ticas produtivas sustent谩veis e equilibradas, garante um adequado ordenamento do territ贸rio na compatibiliza莽茫o da sua utiliza莽茫o para fins produtivos, mas tamb茅m tem preocupa莽玫es ambientais.

Este 茅 um exemplo do investimento que precisamos de fazer em 谩reas e em recursos que, sendo naturais de cada pa铆s, naturalmente permitem uma resposta mais eficaz ao combate 脿 desertifica莽茫o.

听听Daniel Buda (PPE). 鈥� Domnule pre葯edinte, doamn膬 comisar膬, doamnelor 葯i domnilor colegi, de葯ertificarea este o realitate care nu poate fi contestat膬, iar la COP听16 s-a subliniat acest lucru. Potrivit datelor oficiale, de葯ertificarea genereaz膬 costuri globale de peste 300听de听miliarde听de听euro 葯i afecteaz膬 mai mult de 1,5听miliarde听de oameni, cresc芒nd presiunile migra葲ioniste 葯i aliment芒nd r膬zboaiele pentru resurse.

Uniunea pierde anual 74听de听miliarde听de听euro din cauza degrad膬rii terenurilor, iar lipsa ac葲iunii va reduce randamentele culturilor cu cel pu葲in 10听% p芒n膬 卯n 2050, gener芒nd o penurie, at芒t pentru ap膬, c芒t 葯i pentru alimente. Rom芒nia, 葲ara mea, se confrunt膬 din plin cu aceste fenomene. Avem nevoie urgent de ac葲iuni curajoase, care nu doar s膬 previn膬 acest fenomen, ci chiar s膬-l inverseze pe termen lung.

Pentru a ne proteja securitatea alimentar膬, trebuie s膬 investim 卯n tehnologii 葯i solu葲ii inovatoare, precum noile tehnici genomice 卯n gestionarea durabil膬 a apei 葯i dezvoltarea unor sisteme inteligente de iriga葲ii la pre葲uri accesibile pentru to葲i fermierii, 葯i subliniez acest lucru: la pre葲uri accesibile pentru to葲i fermierii.

脦n acela葯i timp, se impune utilizarea eficient膬 a apelor uzate, mai ales 卯n jurul marilor centre urbane, 葯i investi葲ii serioase 卯n ceea ce 卯nseamn膬 desalinizarea apei marine, toate acestea trebuind s膬 devin膬 o prioritate strategic膬 葯i o obliga葲ie fa葲膬 de cet膬葲enii no葯tri.

Investi葲iile din sectorul privat trebuie 卯ncurajate, iar Comisia trebuie s膬 se asigure c膬 statele membre utilizeaz膬 eficient 葯i rapid banii pentru 卯mp膬duriri 葯i perdele forestiere. Europa are la dispozi葲ie solu葲ii, 卯ns膬 f膬r膬 investi葲ii direc葲ionate 葯i finan葲are adecvat膬, nu va putea face fa葲膬 acestor provoc膬ri.

Stima葲i colegi, alegerea este a noastr膬: s膬 ac葲ion膬m acum sau genera葲iile viitoare vor suporta consecin葲ele imobilismului nostru destructibil.

听听Maria Grapini (S&D). 鈥� Domnule pre葯edinte, doamn膬 comisar膬, stima葲i colegi, sigur, dezbatem o problem膬 foarte important膬, p膬cat c膬 sunt a葯a de pu葲ini membri ai Parlamentului European 卯n sal膬. A葯a cum s-a declarat 葯i aici, cum a fost 葯i 卯n declara葲ia Conven葲iei, se degradeaz膬 anual terenul. S-a ajuns la 70听% din terenuri care au fost transformate din starea lor natural膬.

Secetele cauzeaz膬 pagube 葯i costuri 葯i daune, peste 300听de听miliarde pe an. Unde merg aceste daune 葯i pagube? Evident, la fermieri 葯i, p芒n膬 la urm膬, la cet膬葲eni. Doar 卯n perioada 2015-2019, circa 100听de听milioane de hectare de terenuri s膬n膬toase 葯i productive au fost degradate anual, amenin葲芒nd evident, securitatea alimentar膬 a globului, precum 葯i disponibilitatea apei.

Ce trebuie f膬cut, doamn膬 comisar膬? Ne-a葲i relatat ce a fost la Conven葲ie 葯i c膬 nu s-a ajuns la compromisuri importante. Eu cred c膬 Uniunea European膬 trebuie s膬 fie preocupat膬 mai ales de ce se 卯nt芒mpl膬 卯n Uniunea European膬, sigur, 葯i global. Eu cred c膬 trebuie s膬 卯mbun膬t膬葲im instrumentele politice na葲ionale 葯i europene pentru abordarea productiv膬 de gestionare a secetei. Aici avem foarte mult de f膬cut. Este nevoie de alocarea de bugete pentru finan葲area restaur膬rii terenurilor, cre葯terea rezisten葲ei la secet膬, prin cercetare 葯i inovare.

Comisia European膬 trebuie s膬 aib膬 un plan de ac葲iuni la nivelul Uniunii Europene care s膬 combat膬 degradarea terenurilor 卯n colaborare cu statele membre. 葮i mai trebuie f膬cut ceva, doamn膬 comisar膬: politicile Uniunii Europene, ale Comisiei, nu trebuie s膬 se anuleze ca la algebr膬 - plus 葯i minus - sunt mii de hectare acum, cu parcuri fotovoltaice, terenuri care nu mai sunt recuperate zeci de ani.

Trebuie s膬 vedem cum corel膬m听politica energetic膬 cu aceast膬 politic膬 de protejare a terenurilor 葯i cred foarte mult c膬 este nevoie s膬 v膬 g芒ndi葲i, 卯n principal, la cum s膬 nu cre膬m presiune asupra fermierilor din Uniunea European膬, asupra cet膬葲enilor din Uniunea European膬, at芒t timp c芒t 卯n restul globului, Statele Unite, Japonia 葯i celelalte state, nu au votat la aceast膬 Conven葲ie.

听听Mathilde Androu毛t (PfE). 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, 脿 l'issue de la COP16 consacr茅e 脿 la d茅sertification qui a eu lieu 脿 Riyad, 12听milliards ont 茅t茅 s茅curis茅s d'ici听2030 pour am茅liorer les terres, dont dix proviennent de la Banque islamique de d茅veloppement. Dans un rassemblement international, les p茅tromonarchies sont donc venues au secours des d茅serts de sable, d茅serts o霉 parfois on construit, en d茅pit de tout souci environnemental et 茅conomique, des pistes de ski.

Voil脿, une fois de plus, la d茅monstration qu'aux probl猫mes environnementaux, qui sont des probl猫mes localis茅s, on ne peut avoir de r茅ponse globalis茅e. Les COP sont des rassemblements de d茅blocage ou de cr茅ation de fonds financiers, aucunement des lieux de r茅flexion et d'apport de solutions environnementales. Aussi, sur le probl猫me majeur de la d茅sertification et de l'ass猫chement des sols, ayons une vision et des solutions locales. La gestion de l'eau est une question sensible et diff茅rente d'un pays 脿 l'autre et, parfois, d'une r茅gion 脿 l'autre dans un seul et m锚me pays. L'an pass茅, dans le nord de la France, les cultures ont souffert de trop de pluies, soit l'inverse exact des Pyr茅n茅es orientales, en manque d'eau permanent.

Si vous vous refusez au traitement local pour n'op茅rer qu'脿 l'茅chelle europ茅enne, prenons des probl猫mes communs. En Bulgarie comme en Guadeloupe, 60听% de l'eau est perdue tant les infrastructures sont v茅tustes et fuyardes. De m锚me, encouragez le reboisement, le replantage des haies pour favoriser la captation de l'eau par les sols. Bref, appuyez-vous sur ceux qui connaissent le mieux leur environnement, 脿 savoir les paysans, plut么t que sur les financiers des p茅tromonarchies pour r茅gler nos probl猫mes d'eau et de d茅sertification en Europe. 脌 probl猫me local, solution nationale.

听听Marie Toussaint (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, la d茅sertification, c'est l'autre nom de l'injustice climatique et de la vuln茅rabilit茅. C'est d'ailleurs peut-锚tre parce qu'elle a d'abord touch茅 les pays les plus pauvres que les pays les plus riches n'y ont, pendant si longtemps, pr锚t茅 que si peu d'attention. La d茅sertification est aujourd'hui sur nous. La Corse et les parties les plus pauvres de la M茅diterran茅e, Perpignan et ses quartiers parmi les plus pr茅caires de France, ou encore la d茅vast茅e Mayotte, n'ont plus d'eau. En Guadeloupe, l'茅rosion c么ti猫re frappe, puisant dans l'ass猫chement des terres. Quand dans le Massif central, ce sont 茅videmment les petits paysans qui souffrent le plus et qui n'ont pas les moyens d'acheter du foin pour leurs 茅levages lorsque celui-ci vient 脿 manquer.

Au fond, la d茅sertification continue dans l'indiff茅rence, parce qu'elle frappe d'abord et de mani猫re 茅vidente les plus vuln茅rables. Mais ne soyons pas na茂fs: nous r茅aliserons bient么t que la d茅sertification est notre affaire 脿 tous. Esp茅rons qu'alors il ne sera pas trop tard. En Afrique, c'est d茅j脿 16听% du PIB qui s'est 茅vapor茅 du fait de la d茅sertification.

Madame la Commissaire, nous ne sommes pas impuissants, ici, sur le territoire europ茅en, pour un enjeu qui est bien un enjeu plan茅taire. La d茅sertification est li茅e au d茅r猫glement climatique et aux 茅nergies fossiles. Alors sortons-en, et plus vite qu'aujourd'hui. Elle est aussi li茅e 脿 l'agriculture intensive et 脿 la d茅forestation que nous pouvons, que nous devons combattre. Alors agissons! Il n'y a plus de temps 脿 perdre.

听听Valentina Palmisano (The Left). 鈥� Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, non 猫 necessario guardare al Sahara per comprendere la desertificazione: i deserti si trovano ormai dietro casa. Sempre pi霉 spesso, immagini surreali, e allo stesso tempo drammatiche, mostrano paesaggi trasformati, fiumi ridotti a sentieri e laghi completamente prosciugati.

Il 40听% del suolo del Sud Italia 猫 gi脿 a rischio, come tanti paesi del Mediterraneo. In questo modo, stiamo trasformando paesaggi millenari.

E questo non 猫 soltanto il risultato del cambiamento climatico, ma anche di pratiche agricole non sostenibili, che hanno impoverito il nostro suolo. Ecco, il nostro approccio deve cambiare, privilegiando la qualit脿 delle produzioni e la rigenerazione del suolo.

Il degrado non 猫 inevitabile, per fortuna: possiamo invertire la rotta. Servono per貌 incentivi per modelli agricoli basati sulla qualit脿 e sulla rigenerazione del suolo. La politica deve smettere di finanziare pratiche obsolete e supportare invece l'innovazione.

Colleghi, la desertificazione, infatti, non 猫 soltanto una sfida tecnica, ma 猫 anche una questione di giustizia verso i nostri territori e soprattutto verso le generazioni future.

Il mio monito 猫 che non sia la COP17 a salvare il suolo europeo, ma il nostro impegno concreto, oggi.

听听Salvatore De Meo (PPE). 鈥� Signor Presidente, signora Commissaria, onorevoli colleghi, la desertificazione 猫 una delle sfide pi霉 urgenti del nostro tempo, aggravata dal cambiamento climatico e dalle attivit脿 dell'uomo.

Non 猫 solo una crisi ambientale, ma un problema sociale ed economico che minaccia la biodiversit脿, la sicurezza alimentare e la stabilit脿 delle nostre comunit脿, alimentando tensioni e migrazioni forzate.

Pensate che, ogni anno, 12听milioni di ettari vengono degradati, mettendo a rischio la sopravvivenza di oltre un听miliardo di persone. Questo dato ci allarma e ci ricorda che la desertificazione, insieme alla crescente scarsit脿 dell'acqua, richiede risposte immediate, coordinate e ambiziose.

La COP16 猫 stata un'occasione per riflettere sulle nostre responsabilit脿, perch茅 l'Unione europea manca di un'azione comune adeguata e le risorse dedicate sono ancora troppo limitate rispetto alla portata degli interventi.

Dobbiamo impegnarci e sostenere lo sviluppo di politiche sostenibili, promuovendo pratiche agricole rigenerative e resilienti, un uso responsabile delle risorse idriche e l'innovazione tecnologica per ripristinare gli ambienti degradati.

La cooperazione internazionale, inoltre, 猫 importante perch茅 nessun paese pu貌 affrontare da solo questa battaglia. La desertificazione non conosce confini e le sue conseguenze si ripercuotono su scala globale. Solo lavorando insieme possiamo affrontare la complessit脿 di questa sfida. Ci貌 significa condividere conoscenze, tecnologie e risorse, oltre a costruire 鈥� come si sta facendo 鈥� partenariati solidi tra governi, organizzazioni internazionali, societ脿 civile e settore privato.

Combattere la desertificazione significa investire nel futuro, nella nostra diversit脿, nella sicurezza alimentare e nella stabilit脿 delle generazioni future.

听听Thomas Bajada (S&D). 鈥� Mr President, desertification is not a story from far, far away. Its serious implications have long been affecting the Mediterranean region due to its unique ecosystems, economic dependencies and limited natural resources.

In southern Spain, over-irrigation has led to soil erosion. In Crete, aquifers have been overexploited, leading to salinisation. In the neighbouring Sahel region, desertification has displaced millions of people, increasing migratory pressures towards Europe. And in Malta, increased pressure on desalinisation plants raised energy consumption and costs, which are passed on to households and businesses.

Today this is not a story only for southern Europeans. It is also a story shared with other Europeans from temperate and humid climates like Bulgaria. In fact, last year 45听% of the EU's territory faced drought, threatening food production and water security.

Desertification is about humanity, our dependence on water for survival, and our need for water security and food security. Therefore, our response must be people-centred. The fight against desertification demands global cooperation, but it also starts at home in this very House. We need to dramatically increase our political commitment to water 鈥� we need to preserve our lands, help our nature to recover and conserve our water. And, dear Commissioner, we need to act now, with an ambitious European water resilience strategy before it is too late.

As rapporteur of the 合法博彩网站's initiative, I call for decisive action to protect our people and resources and build a sustainable future of a liveable world for future generations to come.

听听France Jamet (PfE). 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, la d茅sertification est une menace importante, mais il en est une dont on ne parle pas assez, c'est la d茅sertification de nos fonds marins. D茅plorer l'acidification de nos oc茅ans, le r茅chauffement des eaux ou la hausse du niveau de la mer ne suffit pas. Il faut aussi d茅noncer les causes de ce d茅sastre. En France, par exemple, dans le Morbihan, on les trouve dans la construction st茅rilisante de parcs 茅oliens offshores ou dans les ravages de bateaux-usines sans-fronti茅ristes. Deux activit茅s nocives, deux activit茅s pourtant encourag茅es par l'Union europ茅enne, qui t茅moignent de l'hypocrisie g茅n茅rale, voire de l'imposture pseudo-茅cologiste sur la pr茅servation et la p茅rennit茅 de nos 茅cosyst猫mes.

Depuis quinze听ans, on constate la d茅gradation alarmante de nos oc茅ans, qui menace nos richesses maritimes, les m茅tiers qui en d茅pendent, au premier rang desquels nos p锚cheurs, et nos ressources alimentaires. Cet 茅quilibre si fragile, aggrav茅 par la pollution terrestre qui se d茅verse dans nos mers, a aussi un impact sur nos climats et sur la d茅sertification terrestre. La pluie salvatrice qu'attendent nos agriculteurs et les populations touch茅es par la s茅cheresse, cette pluie salvatrice ne tombe pas du ciel, elle vient de nos oc茅ans.

Alors tous ces v艙ux pieux et autres d茅clarations d'intention ne r茅soudront rien si nous ne remettons pas en cause l'茅cosyst猫me mondialiste que vous avez mis en place, bas茅 sur un libre-茅changisme d茅r茅gul茅 au d茅triment d'un localisme raisonn茅 et national.

听听Vicent Marz脿 Ib谩帽ez (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Se帽or presidente, en los 煤ltimos diez a帽os, la superficie desertificada en la pen铆nsula ib茅rica se ha multiplicado por veintitr茅s. Es especialmente preocupante en el sur de Alicante, en la Vega Baja, un territorio de transici贸n, precisamente donde la presi贸n urban铆stica es salvaje, donde la presi贸n del sobreturismo es salvaje, y donde ahora ya no ocurre de forma aislada que se corte el agua, sino que ya es de forma recurrente. Y no solo se corta en verano, tambi茅n en otros periodos del a帽o. Ni pasa solo con el agua destinada a la gente y, por lo tanto, con el agua de boca, sino tambi茅n con la que usan los agricultores.

En el mismo territorio tambi茅n ya hay una lucha que se va viviendo en toda Europa, que es por la privatizaci贸n del agua. Tenemos cada vez menos agua y cada vez est谩 gestionada por menos manos y mirando siempre hacia el negocio. Por eso, hacen falta de una vez por todas pol铆ticas valientes que custodien el territorio, que nos adapten al cambio clim谩tico y que protejan a la ciudadan铆a, por ejemplo, ante situaciones como la dana que hemos vivido en Valencia. Y hace falta que el agua sea gestionada de forma p煤blica para que sea un derecho garantizado para el conjunto de la ciudadan铆a.

(El orador acepta responder a una pregunta formulada con arreglo al procedimiento de la 芦tarjeta azul禄)

听听Jo茫o Oliveira (The Left), Pergunta segundo o procedimento 芦cart茫o azul禄. 鈥� Senhor Deputado, o Governo de Portugal avan莽ou recentemente com uma lei chamada Lei dos Solos, que tem como objetivo permitir a constru莽茫o em solos onde at茅 hoje essa constru莽茫o n茫o era permitida. Esta decis茫o, naturalmente, favorece a especula莽茫o imobili谩ria, mas cria tamb茅m problemas de desordenamento do territ贸rio.

O senhor deputado vem da regi茫o de Val锚ncia 鈥� onde ainda recentemente houve uma trag茅dia, na sequ锚ncia de umas cheias 鈥�, por isso, queria colocar-lhe uma quest茫o precisamente a partir da sua experi锚ncia.

Considerando a experi锚ncia na regi茫o de Val锚ncia, decis玫es como esta do Governo portugu锚s, de desordenamento do territ贸rio e de favorecimento da especula莽茫o imobili谩ria, permitem a solu莽茫o de algum problema, por exemplo, o problema da habita莽茫o 鈥� que 茅 o pretexto que o Governo portugu锚s utiliza 鈥�, ou o combate 脿 desertifica莽茫o dos territ贸rios? Ou, pelo contr谩rio, op莽玫es destas de desordenamento do territ贸rio agravam ainda mais as consequ锚ncias de cat谩strofes naturais, como aquelas que atingiram a regi茫o de Val锚ncia?

听听Vicent Marz脿 Ib谩帽ez (Verts/ALE), respuesta de 芦tarjeta azul禄. 鈥� S铆, se帽or diputado Oliveira, la presi贸n urban铆stica y la urbanizaci贸n salvaje de hoy son las v铆ctimas del ma帽ana. Lo hemos visto en nuestra tierra con la dana: se ha construido donde no se pod铆a construir, porque se ha visto que el territorio solo era un espacio de especulaci贸n y no para que la gente tuviera garantizado su espacio vital y se protegieran sus vidas.

La gente ha muerto por estar, entre otras cosas, urbanizando territorios que no se pueden urbanizar. Ha habido una dana que ha llegado con esa cantidad de agua brutal porque estaba absolutamente todo cimentado, porque la tierra no ha podido acoger toda el agua tambi茅n. Por eso es tan importante que se combatan esas iniciativas como la del Gobierno portugu茅s que usted dice, porque urbanizar, insisto, de forma salvaje es crear v铆ctimas en el futuro.

听听Sebastian Everding (The Left). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! 鈥濿盲lder gehen den V枚lkern voran, die W眉sten folgen ihnen鈥�. Das sagte schon im 17.听Jahrhundert der franz枚sische Schriftsteller Chateaubriand. Der Klimawandel und der massive Einsatz von D眉ngemitteln verst盲rken die Bodenerosion und auch das Artensterben. Grundwasserentnahmen f眉r Bergbaut盲tigkeiten, die industrielle Massentierhaltung und die Bew盲sserung in der Landwirtschaft entziehen W盲ldern das Grundwasser, das dringend f眉r die Regeneration in D眉rrezeiten ben枚tigt wird. Sie tragen zur Bodenversandung bei, sch盲digen das 脰kosystem und trocknen CO2-Senken wie Moore aus. Hier muss dringend durch mehr Schutzzonen und mehr Entnahmeeinschr盲nkungen gehandelt werden.

Ein weiteres Mittel gegen W眉stenbildung k枚nnte ein st盲rkerer Fokus auf die Agroforstwirtschaft sein. D眉rren bedrohen bereits jetzt die Lebensgrundlage von rund 1,8听Milliarden Menschen weltweit und bringen gef盲hrdete Gemeinschaften immer weiter an den Rand des Abgrundes. Dar眉ber hinaus kosten sie 300听Milliarden US鈥慏ollar pro Jahr und bedrohen wichtige Wirtschaftssektoren wie die Landwirtschaft, Energie und Wasser. Liebe Frau Kommissarin, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen, wie bei allen anderen Aspekten des Klimawandels gilt auch hier: Es ist weitaus g眉nstiger, jetzt zu handeln, als sp盲ter zu versuchen, die Folgen zu kompensieren.

(Der Redner ist damit einverstanden, auf eine Frage nach dem Verfahren der 鈥瀊lauen Karte鈥� zu antworten.)

听听Sander Smit (PPE), Frage nach dem Verfahren der 鈥瀊lauen Karte鈥�. 鈥� Herr Everding, ich bin hier, hier oben. Sie haben gerade wieder gewettert gegen die Massentierhaltung, wie Sie das nennen 鈥� und zu Unrecht! Wissen Sie eigentlich, dass Ihre Politik der Vertreibung der Bauern aus Europa und auch听unsere immer nachhaltigere Tierhaltung zur Entwaldung anderswo auf der Welt beitragen? Denn die Menschen essen weiterhin tierisches Eiwei脽.

Also wie machen Sie eigentlich holistische Politik? Oder ist das eigentlich Not-In-my-backyard-Politik听鈥� NIMBY? Denn das ist keine Nachhaltigkeit, was Sie hier vorschlagen.

听听Sebastian Everding (The Left), Antwort auf eine Frage nach dem Verfahren der 鈥瀊lauen Karte鈥�. 鈥� Sehr geehrter Herr Kollege! Vielen Dank f眉r den Einwurf, den ich jedoch in keinster Weise nachvollziehen kann. Es ist wissenschaftlich bewiesen, dass eben die industrielle Massentierhaltung听鈥� die Tierhaltung grunds盲tzlich听鈥� ein Riesenemittent von Treibhausgasen ist. Und es werden W盲lder abgeholzt ohne Ende f眉r den Anbau von Futtermitteln. Und w眉rde das alles wegfallen, w盲re mehr Land frei, um Essen f眉r hungernde Menschen anzubauen. Stattdessen wird alles an Tiere verf眉ttert.

Also hier ist die Perspektive ganz anders: Weniger Tierhaltung ist gut f眉r die Umwelt, f眉r die Menschen und f眉r das Klima sowieso.

听听Gabriella Gerzsenyi (PPE). 鈥� Tisztelt Eln枚k 脷r! A teve helyes 谩llat, de nem szeretn茅nk k枚zleked茅si eszk枚zk茅nt haszn谩lni. Az 茅ghajlatv谩ltoz谩s miatt az elsivatagosod谩s Magyarorsz谩gon is egyre nagyobb probl茅ma. Duna-Tisza k枚zi homokh谩ts谩g haz谩nk ter眉let茅nek mintegy 10%-a, most m谩r az ENSZ szerint hivatalosan is f茅lsivatag.

Ez a korm谩nyzati t茅tlens茅gnek a szimb贸luma. Cs枚kkennek a term茅shozamok, megnehez眉l a meg茅lhet茅s, homokviharok el艖fordulnak, tavak sz谩radnak ki 茅s 茅l艖helyek sz疟nnek meg. S nem csak k枚rnyezeti, hanem t谩rsadalmi 茅s gazdas谩gi v谩ls谩g is, hiszen vesz茅lyben az 茅lelmiszer-ell谩t谩s 茅s eln茅ptelenedik a vid茅k.

M谩r k茅t 茅vtizede tudom谩nyos tanulm谩ny 茅s program k茅sz眉lt a probl茅m谩ra. Az akkori korm谩ny elfogadta, a Fidesz-korm谩ny azonban tudatosan figyelmen k铆v眉l hagyja a szak茅rt艖k figyelmeztet茅seit, elhanyagolja a v铆zgazd谩lkod谩st, a talajv茅delmet, ellenben sz谩zmilli谩rdokat k枚lt preszt铆zsberuh谩z谩sokra, p茅ld谩ul stadionokra.

A megold谩s kulcsa az uni贸s, nemzeti 茅s a helyi 枚sszefog谩s. 脷gy v茅lj眉k, hogy eur贸pai szinten 谩tfog贸 strat茅gi谩ra van sz眉ks茅g a fenntarthat贸 f枚ldhaszn谩lat 茅s a v铆zvisszatart贸 technol贸gi谩k t谩mogat谩s谩ra.

A Tisza Magyarorsz谩g legn茅pszer疟bb p谩rtja. Korm谩nyra ker眉l茅s眉nk ut谩n vissza fogjuk 谩ll铆tani az 枚n谩ll贸 k枚rnyezetv茅delmi miniszt茅riumot. Kiemelten foglalkozni fogunk a talajv茅delemmel, v铆zgazd谩lkod谩ssal, eur贸pai forr谩sokat ir谩ny铆tunk az 茅rintett k枚z枚ss茅gekhez, 茅s t谩mogatni fogjuk a gazd谩kat ebben a k眉zdelemben is.

听听C茅sar Luena (S&D). 鈥� Se帽or presidente, se帽or铆as, es un debate en un contexto bastante dif铆cil, porque tenemos al nuevo inquilino de la Casa Blanca y su negacionismo, y un Grupo PPE retardista, ya lo siento. El discurso de ayer del se帽or Tusk nos lleva por esos senderos peligrosos.

Presento dos ideas que son como dos evidencias. El suelo es un recurso no renovable, es importante no olvidarlo. 驴Saben cu谩nto han aumentado las sequ铆as en los 煤ltimos 25听a帽os? Un 30听%. Y, en este contexto, se帽ora comisaria, 驴qu茅 puede hacer la Uni贸n? Le digo que defender las pol铆ticas verdes 鈥攁l paso que vamos鈥� va a ser algo casi contracultural. Pues mire, en primer lugar, una evaluaci贸n de riesgo de desertificaci贸n y degradaci贸n de las tierras, como sugiri贸 el Tribunal de Cuentas Europeo en el a帽o 2018. No sabemos nada de ese informe. La Ley de vigilancia del suelo, por favor, se lo pido a sus colegas del Grupo PPE, porque la est谩n rebajando y rebajando, como todas las normativas medioambientales. Podemos declararnos como regi贸n en riesgo de desertificaci贸n en el marco de la Convenci贸n de las Naciones Unidas. Para eso no tenemos que esperar a ninguna cumbre internacional, eso podemos hacerlo ya nosotros. Y, sobre todo, presente una estrategia espec铆fica de desertificaci贸n, como le ha dicho este Parlamento.

F铆jese: hasta cuatro grandes medidas podemos hacer nosotros solos 鈥攍a Uni贸n Europea鈥� y dar ejemplo en el mundo. Pero claro, hay demasiado retardismo en la derecha. No caiga en eso, se帽ora comisaria, hay muchos Grupos que la vamos a apoyar.

(El orador acepta responder a una pregunta formulada con arreglo al procedimiento de la 芦tarjeta azul禄)

听听Carmen Crespo D铆az (PPE), pregunta de 芦tarjeta azul禄. 鈥� Se帽or presidente, se帽or Luena, el instrumento NextGenerationEU y el Mecanismo de Recuperaci贸n y Resiliencia en Espa帽a est谩n al 51听% de su compromiso, falta un 49听% y no han tenido perspectiva h铆drica, solo perspectiva energ茅tica. Si ahora la comisaria Roswall establece una gobernanza para poder utilizar ese dinero en perspectiva h铆drica, 驴para el Partido Socialista y el Gobierno de Espa帽a ser铆a as铆 y dar铆an el visto bueno para los agricultores, las zonas de regad铆o y las posibilidades de infraestructura h铆drica? Las se帽or铆as de Vox votaron a favor del se帽or S谩nchez y le dieron la posibilidad de no utilizarlo lo suficiente para infraestructura h铆drica. 驴Estar谩n ustedes a favor si hay una reprogramaci贸n de los fondos NextGenerationEU y del Mecanismo de Recuperaci贸n y Resiliencia de ese 49听% que a煤n tienen sin comprometer en Espa帽a?

听听C茅sar Luena (S&D), respuesta de 芦tarjeta azul禄. 鈥� Estaba mirando, se帽or presidente, por si era alguien de la extrema derecha, porque no hubiera aceptado nunca nada, ni tarjeta azul ni verde.

Mire, todo lo relacionado con los fondos europeos, a pesar de su Grupo y de su pol铆tica en Espa帽a, lo estamos sacando adelante bien. Y no quiero recordar aqu铆 lo que han intentado ustedes hacer con la vicepresidenta primera, Teresa Ribera. Es decir, que a pesar de que ustedes aqu铆 est茅n en contra de todo y siempre est茅n poniendo obst谩culos y problemas, nosotros estamos aplicando muy bien los fondos NextGenerationEU en Espa帽a y lo seguiremos haciendo. Solo le pido una cosa: est谩 bien que me haga esa pregunta, pero despu茅s, en Espa帽a, ayuden, que siempre est谩n en contra de todo.

听听Jutta Paulus (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident, Frau Kommissarin, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Als ich ein Kind war, war W眉ste die Sahara oder die Gobi. Ferne, beeindruckende Orte, beschrieben in den Romanen von Karl May oder den Schilderungen von Sven Hedin. Und heute, nur wenige Jahrzehnte sp盲ter, sehen wir W眉stenbildung in Spanien, in Portugal, in Italien, in Griechenland, in Ungarn, in Bulgarien. Wer sich da wundert, hat die Wissenschaft ignoriert oder den Einfl眉sterern der fossilen Industrie geglaubt. Die haben Milliarden investiert, um Zweifel zu s盲en 鈥� Zweifel an den Erkenntnissen, die Exxon selbst schon in den 70ern ermittelt hatte, um sie dann in den Giftschrank zu legen und 枚ffentlich die Wissenschaft zu diskreditieren.

Die Leugner sitzen auch in diesem Haus bei den Rechten, den noch Rechteren und den noch noch Rechteren, und bei der Welt鈥慦眉sten鈥慘onferenz haben wir leider auch keine gro脽en Fortschritte gemacht, denn auch hier sitzen ja die Petrostaaten mit am Tisch. Deshalb: Europa muss handeln. Wir brauchen ein Klimaanpassungsgesetz, das naturbasierte L枚sungen in den Mittelpunkt stellt, und eine glaubw眉rdige Unterst眉tzung f眉r die L盲nder, die am st盲rksten betroffen sind.

(Die Rednerin ist damit einverstanden, auf eine Frage nach dem Verfahren der 鈥瀊lauen Karte鈥� zu antworten.)

听听Maria Grapini (S&D), 卯ntrebare adresat膬 conform procedurii 鈥瀋artona葯ului albastru鈥�. 鈥� Stimat膬 coleg膬, dumneavoastr膬 a葲i spus numai o teorie. Care ar fi propunerea dumneavoastr膬 葯i a grupului dumneavoastr膬, legat de refacerea terenurilor? Pentru c膬, din toate dezbaterile, v膬 opune葲i la agricultur膬, v膬 opune葲i la industrie, v膬 opune葲i la tot! Vrem s膬 avem siguran葲a alimentar膬. Cum vede葲i acest lucru?

听听Jutta Paulus (Verts/ALE), Antwort auf eine Frage nach dem Verfahren der 鈥瀊lauen Karte鈥�. 鈥� Vielen Dank, Frau Kollegin, f眉r die Frage. Es ist mir ein R盲tsel, wo Sie Ihre Anschuldigungen und Informationen hernehmen, denn wir sind ja durchaus die Partei, die f眉r eine b盲uerliche, kleinb盲uerliche, familienzentrierte Landwirtschaft eintritt, die f眉r eine nachhaltige Landwirtschaft eintritt, die im Einklang mit dem steht, was uns die Wissenschaft empfiehlt.

Da brauchen Sie blo脽 mal in die Berichte unserer eigenen Agentur zu schauen 鈥� die Europ盲ische Umweltagentur ist eine Agentur dieser Europ盲ischen Union. Da sitzen hochm枚gende Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler, die sich seit Jahren und Jahrzehnten mit diesen Fragen besch盲ftigen. Und das, was wir in unseren Programmen, in unseren Vorschl盲gen aufgreifen, entspricht dem, was diese Wissenschaft uns vorschl盲gt, denn wir stehen auf dem Boden der Wissenschaft und nicht auf dem Boden der Lobbyinteressen, die hier leider ihre Papiere verbreiten.

听听螡喂魏蠈位伪蟼 桅伪蟻伪谓蟿慰蠉蟻畏蟼 (The Left). 鈥� 螝蠉蟻喂蔚 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 畏 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 螆谓蠅蟽畏 魏伪喂 蟿伪 魏蟻维蟿畏 渭苇位畏 蟿畏蟼 伪蟼 渭畏谓 伪魏慰位慰蠀胃萎蟽慰蠀谓 蟽蟿畏谓 蠀蟺慰魏蟻喂蟽委伪 维位位蔚蟼 蠂蠋蟻蔚蟼 蟿慰蠀 蟺位伪谓萎蟿畏 伪蠀蟿慰蠉. 螣喂 尉畏蟻苇蟼 蟺蔚蟻喂慰蠂苇蟼 蟿畏蟼 螕畏蟼 蟽萎渭蔚蟻伪 魏伪位蠉蟺蟿慰蠀谓 蟺蔚蟻委蟺慰蠀 蟿畏 渭喂蟽萎 苇魏蟿伪蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 螕畏蟼 鈥�41 %鈥� 蔚蟺畏蟻蔚维味慰谓蟿伪蟼 2 未喂蟽蔚魏伪蟿慰渭渭蠉蟻喂伪 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰蠀蟼 伪蠀蟿慰蠉 蟿慰蠀 蟺位伪谓萎蟿畏, 魏伪喂 魏维谓慰蠀渭蔚 蠈蟿喂 未蔚谓 魏伪蟿伪位伪尾伪委谓慰蠀渭蔚. 螒蟼 尾纬维位慰蠀渭蔚 蟿喂蟼 蟺伪蟻蠅蟺委未蔚蟼 蟿喂蟼 魏慰渭渭伪蟿喂魏苇蟼 魏伪喂 伪蟼 蟺维蠄慰蠀渭蔚, 伪纬伪蟺畏蟿慰委 蟽蠀谓维未蔚位蠁慰喂, 谓伪 伪蟻谓喂蠈渭伪蟽蟿蔚 蟿畏谓 魏位喂渭伪蟿喂魏萎 魏蟻委蟽畏. 韦伪 渭苇蟿蟻伪 蟺慰蠀 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 蟺维蟻慰蠀渭蔚 未蔚谓 蔚委谓伪喂 渭蠈谓慰 慰喂魏慰谓慰渭喂魏维. 螘委谓伪喂 魏伪喂 渭苇蟿蟻伪 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏萎蟼 尾慰蠉位畏蟽畏蟼 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 伪蟺慰魏伪蟿维蟽蟿伪蟽畏 蟿蠅谓 伪蟺慰尉畏蟻伪渭苇谓蠅谓 魏伪喂 蟿蠅谓 蔚蟻畏渭喂魏蠋谓 蔚魏蟿维蟽蔚蠅谓 蟿慰蠀 蟺位伪谓萎蟿畏 伪蠀蟿慰蠉. 螝伪位蠋 蟽蔚 未蟻维蟽畏 蟿畏谓 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 螆谓蠅蟽畏, 魏伪喂 谓伪 渭畏谓 渭蔚蟿伪魏喂谓畏胃蔚委 慰蠉蟿蔚 蔚魏伪蟿慰蟽蟿蠈 伪蟺蠈 蟿畏 胃苇蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 谓伪 蟺蟻蠅蟿慰蟽蟿伪蟿蔚委 未喂蔚胃谓蠋蟼 蟽蟿畏谓 魏伪蟿伪蟺慰位苇渭畏蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 魏位喂渭伪蟿喂魏萎蟼 伪位位伪纬萎蟼.

听听Borja Gim茅nez Larraz (PPE). 鈥� Se帽or presidente, el agua es vida y el agua es desarrollo. Hoy vemos como la desertificaci贸n avanza. La falta de agua se ha convertido en una amenaza, especialmente para los pa铆ses y las regiones del sur de Europa. Aunque algunos somos m谩s vulnerables, este desaf铆o nos afecta a todos. Hablamos del acceso a un bien b谩sico. Hablamos de un recurso fundamental para la agricultura y para la ganader铆a, para la industria, para crear empleo y fijar la poblaci贸n.

La Uni贸n Europea debe implicarse de lleno en el impulso de un pacto europeo del agua que establezca medidas integrales para garantizar una gesti贸n sostenible y eficiente de los recursos h铆dricos. Y ese pacto hay que dotarlo de fondos: necesitamos fondos para construir y modernizar infraestructuras hidr谩ulicas, como embalses y presas que permitan regular cauces y gestionar periodos de sequ铆a de forma m谩s eficaz. Necesitamos fondos para mejorar y modernizar los sistemas de regad铆o. Todo ello acompa帽ado de pol铆ticas de gesti贸n eficiente del agua. Y hay que actuar con urgencia.

En Espa帽a, en mi regi贸n, Arag贸n, que tiene zonas profundamente 谩ridas y des茅rticas, el Parlamento auton贸mico aprob贸 por unanimidad en 1992 el llamado Pacto del Agua, un acuerdo que reivindica las obras hidr谩ulicas necesarias para garantizar las necesidades presentes y futuras de la comunidad. Pues bien, en estos treinta a帽os hemos avanzado muy poco: tenemos m谩s de treinta obras pendientes. Sabemos desde hace d茅cadas qu茅 es lo que queremos, lo que necesitamos, pero la falta de voluntad y fondos lo ha dejado en el olvido. Ante la inacci贸n del Gobierno de Espa帽a, la Uni贸n Europea debe adoptar un papel activo. Debe contribuir a financiar estas obras. Hoy ya no es una opci贸n: es una obligaci贸n.

听听Camilla Laureti (S&D). 鈥� Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, la desertificazione va affrontata a livello globale, perch茅 mette a rischio biodiversit脿, risorse idriche e sicurezza alimentare e fa tremare la giustizia sociale.

Spaventa pensare che, anche a causa degli effetti della desertificazione e della siccit脿, entro il 2050 oltre 200听milioni di persone potrebbero essere costrette a migrare.

Lo vediamo anche in Europa: il Sud soffre sempre di pi霉 per siccit脿 e carenza di acqua. In Italia abbiamo intere regioni che restano per lunghi periodi senz'acqua, anche a causa di una scorretta gestione della risorsa idrica.听L'acqua 鈥� il nostro bene pi霉 prezioso 鈥� non 猫 una merce, ma 猫 un diritto, e dobbiamo incentivarne conservazione e riuso e lavorare sulle reti idriche.

Dobbiamo proteggere e ripristinare i nostri suoli, favorire con finanziamenti ad hoc e risorse il passaggio da metodi di coltivazione intensivi a pratiche agricole sostenibili. Se perdiamo i nostri suoli, perdiamo il pianeta.

La desertificazione l'abbiamo vista arrivare e porta anche, e soprattutto, la nostra impronta: per questo, dobbiamo smettere di far finta che non esista e dobbiamo agire sin da ora.

听听Marco Falcone (PPE). 鈥� Signor Presidente, signora Commissaria, onorevoli colleghi, in un momento in cui larga parte del continente fronteggia l'inverno, potrebbe apparire fuori contesto parlare di desertificazione e carenza idrica. Eppure, questo dovrebbe essere l'atteggiamento che qui in Europa dovremmo tutti avere: occuparci per tempo di questa enorme sfida, di questa enorme emergenza, prima che sia troppo tardi.

E ve lo dice chi arriva qua a Strasburgo da una delle due pi霉 importanti isole del Mediterraneo, la Sicilia, e rappresenta due delle pi霉 importanti isole 鈥� assieme alla Sicilia, anche la Sardegna 鈥� entrambe fortemente a rischio. Si immagina che pi霉 del 50听% del territorio delle due regioni, addirittura entro i prossimi trent'anni, potrebbe essere a rischio desertificazione.

Certo, il cambiamento climatico 猫 un fattore decisivo. Purtroppo, per貌, la lotta alla desertificazione non pu貌 essere affidata solo alle misure collegate in qualche modo al Green Deal. Anzi, questo grande contenitore potrebbe diventare un luogo in cui tutto si perde, e gi脿 la Corte dei conti europea, nel 2018, aveva invitato l'Unione europea ad avere una visione completa e a porre in essere dei programmi di pianificazione.

Ecco perch茅 noi del Partito Popolare Europeo siamo per la difesa del territorio, certamente, e riteniamo che le isole debbano essere guardate con grande attenzione. Come? Tramite un serio programma di investimenti e, se vogliamo, di infrastrutture, non solo di transizione energetica.

L'Europa deve avere il coraggio di varare un grande piano di stanziamenti strutturali per la lotta all'avanzare del deserto.

(L'oratore accetta di rispondere a una domanda "cartellino blu")

听听Kai Tegethoff (Verts/ALE), blue-card question. 鈥� Thank you for your words. What you addressed in the end was very clearly the need to invest in infrastructure 鈥� how do you see the connection between investing in infrastructure and fighting desertification? How do you implement Green Deal measures, and how can we actually make sure that we really fight the root cause and not just increase the problems that we have already?

听听Marco Falcone (PPE), risposta a una domanda "cartellino blu". 鈥� Noi del Partito Popolare Europeo guardiamo a un approccio molto pragmatico. Certamente, la transizione ecologica diventa per noi il faro, ma al contempo riteniamo che un serio programma di investimenti debba essere calibrato alle esigenze del territorio. Non dobbiamo eccedere in un senso, ma nemmeno in un altro.

Certamente, gli interventi in agricoltura, gli interventi tecnologici e, se vogliamo, anche un serio piano di investimenti, soprattutto in condutture idriche di adduzione e, se vogliamo, di approvvigionamento, possono rappresentare certamente una soluzione.

Lo dico per la Sicilia 鈥� io provengo dalla Sicilia 鈥� dove l'acqua non manca, ma mancano le infrastrutture. Per cui, grazie per il suo input.

听听Leire Paj铆n (S&D). 鈥� Se帽or presidente, se帽or铆as, se ha dicho aqu铆 reiteradamente, nos enfrentamos a una crisis aparentemente silenciosa, pero profundamente devastadora: la desertificaci贸n, la p茅rdida de suelos f茅rtiles y de recursos h铆dricos. De nuevo, es una crisis global que nos afecta a todos, tambi茅n en Europa, especialmente en el Mediterr谩neo, en pa铆ses como Espa帽a, en regiones como Alicante.

Hasta el 40听% de las tierras del mundo 鈥攃asi la mitad鈥� est谩n degradadas. Esto supone una amenaza a la biodiversidad, pero tambi茅n a la seguridad alimentaria. Las cifras lo dejan bien claro: el 90听% de la poblaci贸n mundial pasa hambre; es decir, m谩s de 700听millones de personas, por no hablar de los cientos de miles de desplazados y de refugiados por la desertificaci贸n y por el cambio clim谩tico.

El derecho a la alimentaci贸n es fundamental. Se帽or铆as, no podemos estar hablando aqu铆 de las sequ铆as y de la desertificaci贸n, pero luego intentar retrasar y retardar las normas que protegen contra la degradaci贸n de los suelos o que protegen la biodiversidad. No podemos hablar aqu铆 de las cifras, pero despu茅s querer ser m谩s laxos con las leyes que luchan contra eso.

Por eso, se帽or铆as, como dijo el Tribunal de Cuentas, como dijo Naciones Unidas y como ha dicho el Consejo, necesitamos un plan ambicioso, transversal, que se coordine con otras Convenciones de las Naciones Unidas, con presupuesto y con objetivos, sin m谩s demora.

听听Manuela Ripa (PPE). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident! Die W眉stenbildung ist eines der dr盲ngendsten Probleme unserer Zeit 鈥� nicht nur etwa in Afrika oder in Asien, auch in Europa. 13 EU鈥慙盲nder in S眉d鈥�, Mittel鈥� und Osteuropa sind nach eigenen Angaben bereits betroffen. Auch in anderen Teilen Europas schreitet die Austrocknung von B枚den voran. Zuk眉nftig k枚nnten auch hier W眉sten entstehen. Dass es dringenden Handlungsbedarf gibt, dieses Bewusstsein war nicht ausreichend vorhanden bei der COP16 in Riad. Auch in der EU wird definitiv nicht gen眉gend getan. Probleme sind voranschreitende Bodenversiegelung, Entwaldung, zu intensive Landnutzung, falsche Bewirtschaftung. Der Klimawandel mit D眉rren und Starkregenereignissen beschleunigt zudem noch den Verlust fruchtbarer B枚den.

Daher ist es von entscheidender Bedeutung, dass wir in Europa neben einer effektiven Wasserstrategie das EU鈥態odengesetz verabschieden 鈥� als erster wichtiger Schritt hin zu mehr Bodenschutz und gegen W眉stenbildung. Bei der W眉stenbildung ist es wie beim Klimawandel. Es ist viel kosteng眉nstiger und einfacher, jetzt Gegenma脽nahmen zu ergreifen, als die Dinge umzukehren, wenn der Schaden schon eingetreten ist. Denn dann ist es zu sp盲t.

听听Jean-Marc Germain (S&D). 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, mes chers coll猫gues, Bakou, Cali, Riyad, les diff茅rentes COP se suivent et se ressemblent. Elles sont toujours utiles par leur existence m锚me, mais jamais 脿 la hauteur: 40听% des sols seraient d茅grad茅s dans le monde et 75听% de la population mondiale en sera affect茅e d'ici 脿听2050, 75听%. On le sait, les plus vuln茅rables en sont les premi猫res victimes.

Appelons un chat un chat: cette COP fut une d茅ception. Et si l'Europe a fait preuve de volontarisme sur la promotion de la r茅silience 脿 la s茅cheresse, son r么le a 茅t茅 plus ambigu: en s'opposant 脿 un protocole juridiquement contraignant sur la s茅cheresse, en portant insuffisamment les pratiques agricoles durables et par une contribution financi猫re insuffisante. Le Partenariat mondial de r茅silience 脿 la s茅cheresse et ses 12听milliards de promesses a le m茅rite d'exister. Mais c'est une goutte d'eau, si je puis dire, par rapport aux 2听500 milliards n茅cessaires pour restaurer le milliard d'hectares de terres d茅grad茅es.

Alors que Donald听Trump vient de sortir de l'accord sur le climat, faisons preuve de leadership. Allons en Mongolie pour la COP17 avec des propositions et des aides concr猫tes, faute de quoi la plan猫te et les g茅n茅rations futures ne nous le pardonneront pas.

听听Dan-艦tefan Motreanu (PPE). 鈥� Doamn膬 comisar膬, domnule pre葯edinte, stima葲i colegi, de葯ertificarea afecteaz膬 deja 13 state membre, iar seceta cauzeaz膬 pierderi de 9听miliarde听de听euro anual. Doar 卯n Rom芒nia, 400听de听mii de hectare sunt afectate de de葯ertificare. Adoptarea Regulamentului privind restaurarea naturii impune statelor membre s膬 refac膬 20听% din terenurile degradate p芒n膬 卯n 2030.

Din p膬cate, regulamentul nu a fost 卯nso葲it de aloc膬ri bugetare suplimentare. Drept urmare, solicit Comisiei Europene ca 卯n urm膬torul exerci葲iu financiar s膬 abordeze aceast膬 insuficien葲膬 葯i s膬 pun膬 fonduri concrete la dispozi葲ia 葲膬rilor din Uniune.

Totodat膬, pentru men葲inerea securit膬葲ii alimentare, este esen葲ial s膬 sporim investi葲iile 卯n dezvoltarea sistemelor de iriga葲ii inteligente, utilizarea apelor urbane reziduale tratate, captarea apei pluviale 葯i construirea de rezervoare.

脦n plus, rezultatele cercet膬rii privind desalinizarea apei marine din programul Orizont Europa trebuie s膬 fie accesibile statelor membre pentru implementarea acestor tehnologii moderne la costuri reduse.

听听Stefano Bonaccini (S&D). 鈥� Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, siccit脿, incendi e pratiche produttive che minano la fertilit脿 dei suoli stanno innalzando il rischio di desertificazione anche qui in Europa, dove 13听paesi, tra cui il mio e altri sei nel bacino del Mediterraneo in particolare, sono colpiti da questo fenomeno.

A rimetterci sono produzione e sicurezza alimentare, tessuto sociale ed economico delle aree colpite, e i nostri agricoltori, prime vittime dei cambiamenti climatici che qualcuno, addirittura ancora oggi, nega.

L'Unione europea deve essere protagonista in questa sfida a livello globale, diffondendo nei paesi pi霉 a rischio buone pratiche 鈥� ad esempio, irrigazione di precisione o depurazione e riuso agricolo delle acque reflue 鈥� e con un piano europeo per le acque, e per l'acqua, che con pi霉 risorse per le politiche di sviluppo regionale e rurale 鈥� confido per delega nel Commissario Fitto 鈥� sostenga e semplifichi investimenti per una maggiore capacit脿 di accumulo 鈥� dighe invasi, bacini e reti di distribuzione pi霉 efficienti 鈥� e autorizzi nuove colture che necessitano di meno acqua.

Il prossimo bilancio pluriennale, allora, deve diventare l'occasione per migliorare alcune politiche dell'Unione e sostenere con i fatti, e non le parole, cittadini e imprese nel contrasto al cambiamento climatico.

听听艦tefan Mu艧oiu (S&D). 鈥� Domnule pre葯edinte, doamn膬 comisar膬, dragi colegi, la nivelul Uniunii, de葯ertificarea afecteaz膬 8听% din teritoriu, a葯a cum au precizat 葯i colegii mei antevorbitori. Zonele cele mai prejudiciate 卯ns膬 sunt cele din Europa Central膬, de Sud 葯i de Est. 葮i 葲ara mea, Rom芒nia, sufer膬 din cauza acestui proces nes膬n膬tos al naturii. 40听% din suprafa葲a sa agricol膬 este 卯n pericol s膬 se transforme 卯n dune de nisip.

De aceea, nu trebuie s膬 permitem ca acest neajuns major s膬 devin膬 o amenin葲are la adresa siguran葲ei alimentare a genera葲iilor viitoare de europeni. Acest fenomen grav trebuie decelerat prin strategii comunitare concrete 葯i ferme.

Trebuie s膬 avem 卯n vedere c膬 micii fermieri din toate aceste zone de pe continent, afectate de de葯ertificare, sunt 葯i ei 卯n pericol. Nu au cum s膬 se lupte singuri 卯mpotriva naturii 葯i trebuie s膬 le venim 卯n ajutor. Au nevoie de sus葲inere financiar膬 european膬 care s膬 dubleze eforturile mai mari sau mai mici ale guvernelor na葲ionale. Mizez pe 卯n葲elepciunea noastr膬 comun膬 葯i pe o reac葲ie mai bine conturat膬 a Comisiei pentru fr芒narea acestui fenomen natural periculos.

Interventions 脿 la demande

听听Grzegorz Braun (NI). 鈥� Mr President, Laudetur Jesus Christus. The worst disaster 鈥� highly unnatural disaster 鈥� that ever hit Europe is you, the European Commission and the majority of this House. You just cannot help coming up with constant ideas of how to solve problems that you yourself create by implementing your Euro-Communist doctrines.

The best climate policy that we can 鈥� and should 鈥� afford would be good climate for business, instead of overregulation, overtaxation. I can see that this today's debate leads to a new assault, new attack on our nations. The Blue Deal is coming after the Green Deal, and here you have to prepare it by producing some proper propaganda, quantum. So this all makes no sense; the European Union, the Euro co-host, should be overthrown.

听听H茅lder Sousa Silva (PPE). 鈥� Senhor Presidente, Senhora Comiss谩ria, a desertifica莽茫o 茅 um desafio crescente que se coloca 脿 Uni茫o Europeia, especialmente nos Estados-Membros do Sul e, particularmente, pr贸ximos do Mediterr芒neo.

A falta de 谩gua, a exaust茫o dos solos e as altera莽玫es clim谩ticas s茫o, hoje, uma dura realidade nalgumas zonas da Uni茫o e, al茅m disso, assistimos tamb茅m ao despovoamento de algumas regi玫es do interior por falta de atratividade e de competitividade.

Portugal enfrenta cumulativamente estes dois problemas. As regi玫es do Alentejo e do Algarve evidenciam uma brutal falta de 谩gua, quer para agricultura, quer para consumo humano. E as regi玫es pr贸ximas da fronteira com Espanha sofrem de despovoamento.

Em resultado destas duas situa莽玫es, assistimos a fluxos migrat贸rios do interior para o litoral, das zonas rurais para as zonas urbanas, que s茫o verdadeiros problemas. Por isso, considero que o pr贸ximo quadro financeiro plurianual deve responder 脿 desertifica莽茫o e ao despovoamento e, assim, resolver o problema de coes茫o territorial que enfrentamos na nossa Uni茫o.

听听Se谩n Kelly (PPE). 鈥� (N铆or phioc an micreaf贸n suas t煤s na h贸r谩ide) ... labhairt ar an 谩bhar t谩bhachtach seo, gaineamhl煤 an domhain.

And depending on who you're listening to, between 20听% and 40听% of land is threatened with desertification, particularly in places like the Sahel, Gobi Desert, South America. I think it's good that the European Union are now emphasising that deforestation, in particular, has to end in any free trade deals we'll be doing.

Within Europe, we will be shortly discussing the next CAP and, obviously, protection of the soil, nature restoration are going to be key in that. And I would make one suggestion: give every farmer in Europe a minimum of 50 trees native to their own area to set on their farm. This would help to restore nature, protect the soils and be a small step to end desertification.

B铆mis ag dul ar aghaidh de r茅ir a ch茅ile, mar de r茅ir a ch茅ile a dh茅antar na caisle谩in.

(Fin des interventions 脿 la demande)

听听Jessika Roswall, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Mr President, honourable Members, your interventions show how important it is for the EU to continue tackling the interconnected challenges of droughts, land use, climate change, biodiversity loss and water scarcity together for our economy, our security and our livelihoods. They show that we are not ignoring the difficulties we face in the current geopolitical climate. And as many of you have also mentioned, we are all affected.

I just also want to say 鈥� and this is to C茅sar Luena 鈥� that the Commission is not ignoring this. And I just want to repeat one thing that I said in my first remark: the Commission is responding to the recommendation of the European Court of Auditors by developing a methodology to assess land degradation and desertification for the EU.

Although we didn't leave Riyadh with all our desired outcomes, we should still acknowledge and build on the important progress that was made. So now we need to keep up the momentum. We need to accelerate implementation at national and international levels, and continue our work to agree on the outstanding COP16 decisions, especially on droughts.

Many of you have underlined the importance of water and the need to make progress on strengthening our water resilience, so I also want to say 鈥� as I said earlier, and I know you know 鈥� that the Commission has made it a priority to present a new strategy on this.

I know 合法博彩网站 is already making progress on its reports on this. I thank you today for your input, and I look forward to close dialogue with you, with your rapporteur, Thomas Bajada, and all of you on this important topic, and of course, on continuing fighting desertification.

听听Le Pr茅sident. 鈥� Le d茅bat est clos.

D茅clarations 茅crites (article 178)

听听Javi L贸pez (S&D), por escrito. 鈥� El suelo es un recurso no renovable y cr铆tico para nuestra supervivencia. En los 煤ltimos 25 a帽os, las sequ铆as aumentaron casi un 30听% y afectaron a 1听800听millones de personas. Pese a los avances discutidos en la CP16 de Riad, seguimos sin respuestas claras y concretas.

En la Uni贸n, necesitamos una evaluaci贸n del riesgo de desertificaci贸n 鈥攃omo pidi贸 el Tribunal de Cuentas en su Informe Especial sobre desertificaci贸n de 2018鈥�, as铆 como mayor ambici贸n en la negociaci贸n de la Ley de vigilancia del suelo para neutralizar los numerosos intentos del PPE y de la derecha para debilitarla.

Asimismo, la Uni贸n deber铆a declararse como parte en riesgo de desertificaci贸n en el marco de la Convenci贸n de Lucha contra la Desertificaci贸n de las Naciones Unidas, como pidi贸 el Parlamento en su informe sobre la Estrategia sobre Biodiversidad de junio de 2021.

Por 煤ltimo, necesitamos que la Comisi贸n presente una estrategia de desertificaci贸n que aborde este fen贸meno desde diferentes 谩mbitos y proporcione una visi贸n conjunta que nos permita alcanzar la meta de neutralidad de la degradaci贸n de la tierra en 2030. La desertificaci贸n es una amenaza ambiental y un desaf铆o social, econ贸mico y de seguridad alimentaria. No podemos permitirnos la inacci贸n.

(La s茅ance est suspendue quelques instants)

IN THE CHAIR: CHRISTEL SCHALDEMOSE
Vice-President

(The sitting resumed at 10:29)

听听President. 鈥� The next item is the Commission statement on 'Cryptocurrencies 鈥� need for global standards' ().

听听Magnus Brunner, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, honourable Members, first of all, sorry I'm a couple of minutes late 鈥� I was in the office, actually, but I didn't make it here on time, I'm sorry about that. Also, thank you for the opportunity to contribute to this debate on the need to agree on global policy standards for crypto. As you may well know, these standards, of course, do exist and have been agreed in international fora. Let me give you a brief overview of how they came about and where the EU stands in their implementation.

International regulatory and policy organisations have been working on international crypto standards for a number of years now. Early on, there was an international understanding that crypto markets are global markets and are largely unregulated and pose, of course, also risks that need to be addressed. And then in 2023 the G20 unveiled the crypto-asset policy implementation roadmap, which reflected the policy and regulatory responses developed primarily by the International Monetary Fund, the Financial Stability Board and standard-setting bodies covering specific areas of finance such as the International Organization of Securities Commissions on investor protection, or also the Financial Action Task Force on anti-money laundering.

The core of these international standards on crypto are the FSB recommendations on crypto-asset markets and activities, and recommendations for global stablecoin arrangements. The European Union is the first major jurisdiction to have reflected those standards in law. We have done this by adopting the Regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA), which has now started to apply, and we have also amended other legislation such as the Anti-Money Laundering Directive and also the Transfer of Funds Regulation.

We are strongly committed to ensuring the global implementation of international standards. We regularly advocate this in the relevant international fora in which we as a European Union participate.

Implementation of international standards of course is necessary, not only to ensure a minimum level of policy and regulatory convergence internationally, but also to ensure that jurisdictions follow a sensible common denominator in addressing the risks also posed by the crypto markets. This is particularly important in crypto markets, which are global in nature, of course 鈥� yes, everyone knows that, with crypto exchanges and platforms operating across borders and assets also moving on open networks that are widely accessible.

The adoption of international crypto standards has so far been incremental. Indeed, jurisdictions have made progress also in implementing the policy and also the regulatory responses developed by, as I said, the IMF, the FSB and the standard鈥憇etting bodies. Almost all FSB jurisdictions have plans to develop new 鈥� or at least revise existing 鈥� regulatory frameworks for crypto.

Information gathered at the international level suggests that the majority of FSB member jurisdictions expect to achieve alignment with the FSB framework by this year, by 2025. And this is of course very good news. We will continue to support relevant international organisations to ensure that the momentum we have now in implementing international standards on crypto is maintained. And we stand, of course, ready to work with jurisdictions that wish to benefit from our experience with MiCA. This includes the US. The US has been heavily involved in defining, together with other partners, the international standards on crypto, and I'm convinced that the new administration is fully aware of the fact that a robust policy response to crypto requires also an international effort.

We therefore look forward, of course, to continuing working with the US authorities as they consider their policy approach to crypto assets and related service providers, and we would view it as a positive development if the US were to make progress on crypto鈥憇pecific legislation that would provide greater legal clarity on the treatment of crypto assets and related service providers, while at the same time also addressing the risks we are facing. And we believe existing international standards should form the basis of any crypto framework, including, of course, the one in the US, not least because they ensure international convergence in this area and contribute to a level playing field.

Our experience in the European Union has shown that ensuring legal clarity is the right way to support innovation in these markets, while mitigating, on the other hand, of course, also the risks we are facing. Developments in the crypto market since the adoption of MiCA have only strengthened the case for legal clarity. Whatever approach the US ultimately takes, we do hope it will ensure that innovation flourishes while allowing, of course, on the other hand, also bad actors to be weeded out.

听听Markus Ferber, im Namen der PPE-Fraktion. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, Herr Kommissar, liebe Kolleginnen, liebe Kollegen! Diverse Kryptow盲hrungen, allen voran Bitcoin, haben in den vergangenen Tagen Rekordkurse erklommen. Der Grund ist klar: Die neue Administration in den Vereinigten Staaten ist diese Woche ins Amt gekommen, und sie wird sehr viel kryptofreundlicher sein als die Vorg盲ngerverwaltung. Der neue US-Pr盲sident spricht gar davon, eine strategische Bitcoin-Reserve aufzubauen und die USA zum Krypto-Mekka der Welt machen zu wollen. Dass Donald Trump es wohl ernst meint, sieht man auch daran, dass er selbst einen eigenen Meme Coin aufgelegt hat, der wohl nur ein Ziel hat: seinen Reichtum noch etwas zu vergr枚脽ern. Ich glaube, die Anleger werden nichts davon haben.

Unabh盲ngig davon, wie man zu Kryptow盲hrungen steht, unterstreicht diese Entwicklung ein grunds盲tzliches Problem: Obwohl Kryptow盲hrungen ein globales Ph盲nomen sind, haben wir keinen internationalen Ordnungsrahmen. Ein Regierungswechsel in den USA f眉hrt deshalb sehr schnell dazu, dass sich die Marktlage rapide ver盲ndert und da auch der Verbraucherschutz, auch f眉r europ盲ische Anleger, massiv unter die R盲der kommt. In anderen Teilen des Finanzmarkts, vom Bankensektor bis zum Clearing, haben wir uns aus guten Gr眉nden auf internationale Standards verst盲ndigt. Die haben wir im Kryptosektor bisher nicht, und das r盲cht sich jetzt auch.

In der Europ盲ischen Union sind wir mit der Verordnung 眉ber M盲rkte f眉r Krypto-Assets, der MiCAR, weltweit Vorreiter. Wir haben in der EU ein glaubw眉rdiges Regelwerk geschaffen, das den Wildwest-Ausw眉chsen wie in den USA听einen Riegel vorschiebt und gleichzeitig Vorhersehbarkeit und Planbarkeit f眉r alle Marktteilnehmer schafft. Es g盲be also bereits eine Blaupause f眉r internationale Mindeststandards. Deswegen, lieber Herr Kommissar, sollten wir von dieser Blaupause Gebrauch machen und auf internationale L枚sungen hinwirken. Dass das nicht einfach ist, ist klar. Aber wenn wir nicht anfangen, werden wir es nie schaffen.

听听Jon谩s Fern谩ndez, en nombre del Grupo S&D. 鈥� Se帽ora presidenta, se帽or comisario, sin duda, yo creo que todos podr铆amos convenir en la necesidad de esas normas internacionales para el mercado de las cripto. As铆 he entendido las palabras de la Comisi贸n apelando a la necesidad de fijar esos est谩ndares m铆nimos.

Pero, ciertamente, viendo lo que estamos viendo al otro lado del Atl谩ntico, yo creo que deber铆amos empezar a reconsiderar los buenos prop贸sitos y empezar a trabajar m谩s para proteger Europa, en un tiempo en que Donald Trump e incluso su mujer emiten su propia moneda 鈥攃omo dec铆a mi colega Markus Ferber鈥� en los d铆as previos a tomar posesi贸n, mostrando poco respeto, en mi opini贸n, por la propia institucionalidad. Deber铆amos recibir el mensaje en Europa, y yo creo que el mensaje que tenemos que recibir es que no podemos contar con la Administraci贸n estadounidense en los pr贸ximos a帽os para llegar a ning煤n tipo de acuerdo m铆nimo sobre criptomonedas.

Por lo tanto, en vez de apelar a los buenos prop贸sitos en los que llevamos empe帽ados a帽os, deber铆amos tener una posici贸n mucho m谩s asertiva y ser conscientes de que ese escenario va a ser casi imposible y que, por lo tanto, tenemos que aplicar el Reglamento MiCA 鈥攃laro que hay que aplicar el Reglamento MiCA鈥�, pero tenemos que tambi茅n proteger a nuestro sector financiero, a nuestros bancos y a nuestros seguros de posibles impactos de inestabilidad financiera derivada de las cripto m谩s all谩 de Europa. Y debemos tambi茅n acelerar la negociaci贸n para tener un euro digital en Europa que permita ofrecer una respuesta propia a las necesidades, al parecer, de algunos inversores.

听听Pierre Pimpie, au nom du groupe PfE. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, les cryptomonnaies priv茅es ne sont pas rattach茅es 脿 des 脡tats et se d茅veloppent en dehors de tout cadre d茅mocratique. Elles ne sont pas de vraies monnaies, puisque les tr猫s fortes variations de cours leur 么tent toute valeur de r茅serve. Elles n'ont que la valeur que la sp茅culation pure veut bien leur conf茅rer. Ce sont des actifs fant么mes qui ne refl猫tent pas la force d'une 茅conomie. C'est un fantasme pur qui sert aux tractations opaques et aux 茅changes occultes. C'est un jouet technologique brillant, certes, mais c'est aussi un sympt么me grave, celui de la d茅fiance vis-脿-vis des 脡tats, des banques centrales et des monnaies traditionnelles.

Les plus grands pays du monde sont tr猫s endett茅s. La pression fiscale atteint en France des niveaux effrayants et la crise sanitaire a montr茅 que les r茅gimes d茅mocratiques eux-m锚mes pouvaient 锚tre liberticides. Ainsi, les investisseurs peuvent aussi regarder les cryptomonnaies comme un refuge hors de port茅e des 脡tats faillis. Notre responsabilit茅 est donc certes de r茅glementer ces cryptomonnaies et de les respectabiliser, mais c'est surtout de garantir nos vraies monnaies en g茅rant nos finances publiques de fa莽on 脿 ne pas faire fuir les capitaux.

听听Marlena Mal膮g, w imieniu grupy ECR. 鈥� Szanowni Pa艅stwo. Unia Europejska dzi臋ki wprowadzeniu przepis贸w MICA sta艂a si臋 globalnym pionierem w regulacji rynku kryptoaktyw贸w, wyzwalaj膮c je tak naprawd臋 z szarej strefy. Nale偶y doceni膰 fakt, 偶e regulacja MICA wprowadza obowi膮zek raportowania, zapewnia mechanizmy kontroli wewn臋trznej oraz wymaga separacji aktyw贸w klienta od aktyw贸w dostawc贸w us艂ug kryptowalutowych. To podstawy, kt贸re zapewniaj膮 wi臋ksz膮 przejrzysto艣膰, bezpiecze艅stwo inwestor贸w. Co wa偶ne, zabezpieczone s膮 tak偶e interesy pa艅stw cz艂onkowskich spoza strefy euro.

Kryptowaluty, jak wiemy, nie maj膮 granic. Musimy sobie jednak jasno powiedzie膰, 偶e r贸偶nice mi臋dzy krajami znacz膮co obni偶aj膮 atrakcyjno艣膰 tego rynku i spowalniaj膮 jego rozw贸j. Dlatego konieczne jest wypracowanie globalnych standard贸w regulacyjnych. Unia Europejska, cho膰 jest liderem w tej dziedzinie, musi uwa偶a膰, by nie przyj膮膰 jak zwykle zbyt restrykcyjnego podej艣cia, kt贸re mog艂oby wepchn膮膰 innowacje, inwestycje w bardziej elastyczne rynki spoza Unii Europejskiej.

Jeszcze niedawno kryptowaluty o偶ywia艂y marzenia cz臋艣ci inwestor贸w o infrastrukturze finansowej niezale偶nej od bank贸w centralnych. Dzi艣 te marzenia nieco os艂ab艂y. Ale kryptowaluty s膮 i b臋d膮 trwa艂ym elementem globalnej gospodarki. Naszym zadaniem jest traktowanie kryptowalut jako narz臋dzi finansowych, kt贸re wymagaj膮 odpowiedniej regulacji, ale bliskich rynkom tradycyjnym, takich regulacji, kt贸re zapewni膮 bezpiecze艅stwo inwestorom, nie t艂umi膮c jednocze艣nie innowacji. Nie mo偶emy przespa膰 tej rewolucji. Przysz艂o艣膰 rynku kryptowalut wymaga r贸wnowagi mi臋dzy ochron膮 interes贸w klienta a umo偶liwieniem przede wszystkim dalszego rozwoju.

听听St茅phanie Yon-Courtin, au nom du groupe Renew. 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Monsieur le Commissaire, aux 脡tats-Unis, Donald听Trump se r锚ve en pr茅sident de la crypto. R茅sultat, la cryptosph猫re s'enflamme, une cryptomonnaie cr茅茅e 脿 son effigie et une autre d茅di茅e 脿 Melania, le bitcoin qui s'envole et la d茅mission du pr茅sident de l'Autorit茅 des march茅s financiers am茅ricains. Pendant ce chaos, en Europe, nous avons fait un choix diff茅rent: r茅guler pour prot茅ger.

Avec le r猫glement MiCA, nous avons pos茅 les bases d'un march茅 des cryptomonnaies s茅curis茅, imposant des mesures solides contre le blanchiment d'argent et contre le financement du terrorisme, comme par exemple la v茅rification des identit茅s et le signalement des activit茅s suspectes. Car oui, les cryptomonnaies ont des avantages. Elles offrent de nouvelles opportunit茅s d'investissement, encouragent les plus jeunes 脿 venir investir, et permettent un soutien vital face 脿 des syst猫mes corrompus ou en zone de guerre, comme pour la diaspora ukrainienne.

Mais elles ne doivent pas devenir une jungle mondiale au service des fraudeurs et des criminels. 脌 ceux qui, en Europe, flirtent avec les leaders am茅ricains du bitcoin: savez-vous que leur v茅ritable objectif est de contourner nos devises officielles, 脿 commencer par l'euro, et de saboter notre syst猫me mon茅taire en Europe? Dr么les de souverainistes. Comme pour l'intelligence artificielle ou la taxation minimale, l'Europe doit pousser pour un cadre mondial. Les cryptomonnaies ne doivent pas devenir un eldorado pour les tricheurs, mais un outil au service de tous les investisseurs听2.0.

Monsieur le Commissaire, agissez maintenant pour adopter au plus vite des normes mondiales minimales. Il y va de la souverainet茅 de l'Europe, de celle de l'euro et de la protection de nos concitoyens europ茅ens.

听听Rasmus Andresen, im Namen der Verts/ALE-Fraktion. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin! Seit knapp einer Woche gibt es den Trump Meme Coin听鈥� 枚konomisch wertlos und f眉r Trump鈥慒ans vor allem eine emotionale Bindung zu ihrem gro脽en Idol. Der TrumpCoin ist eine Betrugsmaschine, das zum Teil auch ausl盲ndische Geld geht in die Kassen der Trump鈥慒amilie. W盲hrend Ex鈥慤S鈥慞r盲sident Jimmy Carter Ende der 70er-Jahre noch seine Erdnussfarm verkaufen musste, als er gew盲hlt wurde, betr眉gt Trump auf der ganzen Linie. Aber der TrumpCoin ist vor allem auch eine Symbolik f眉r eine andere US鈥慞olitik im Bereich der Kryptow盲hrungsregulierung, und das sollte uns Sorgen machen. Wir sollten hier ganz klar feststellen, dass Anlagen in Kryptos mit hohen Risiken verbunden sind und dass wir auch wissen, dass das Geldw盲scherisiko bei Kryptow盲hrungen deutlich h枚her ist als in anderen Bereichen.

Der Mehrwert, der durch Kryptow盲hrungen geschaffen wird, ist fraglich. US鈥慞r盲sident Trump 枚ffnet mit blinder Deregulierung und auch, indem er Krypto鈥慤ltras in wichtige Finanz盲mter in seiner Administration bef枚rdert, der Privatisierung des W盲hrungssystems T眉r und Tor. Lassen Sie mich ganz klar sagen: Das darf nicht der europ盲ische Weg sein. Ich bin froh, dass eigentlich aus den gro脽en Fraktionen fast alle Redner auch Skepsis zum Ausdruck gebracht haben und deutlich gemacht haben, dass wir auf der einen Seite internationale Standards brauchen 鈥� ja 鈥�, aber dass wir nicht den Kurs einschlagen sollten, den die Trump鈥慉dministration hier auf den Weg bringt.

听听President. 鈥� Mr Andresen, I just want to let you know that it's not allowed to show images here in the Chamber when you're speaking. Please remember that.

听听Pasquale Tridico, a nome del gruppo The Left. 鈥� Signora Presidente, signor Commissario, onorevoli colleghi, mentre negli Stati Uniti, con l'insediamento di Trump, il Bitcoin raggiunge valori storici e persino una moneta meme di Trump guadagna miliardi di capitalizzazione, in Europa il dibattito sulle valute digitali resta fermo, specialmente per quanto riguarda l'euro digitale.

L'euro digitale emesso dalla Banca centrale europea rappresenterebbe una risposta pubblica, sicura e indipendente, a sostegno della nostra autonomia strategica ed economica rispetto alle criptovalute, che, a causa della loro volatilit脿 e della mancanza di regolamentazione, non possono offrire un metodo di pagamento stabile.

Questo progetto, per貌, rimane bloccato per alcuni paesi che mettono il veto e gruppi politici. Noi, invece, sosteniamo con forza l'introduzione di questo strumento, perch茅 garantirebbe l'indipendenza strategica dell'Europa dai colossi stranieri, principalmente americani, che monopolizzano i pagamenti elettronici, permetterebbe la costruzione di un'infrastruttura europea per i pagamenti digitali, ridurrebbe i costi di transazione per consumatori e venditori e, inoltre, aumenterebbe la stabilit脿 finanziaria.

L'euro digitale rappresenterebbe anche una risposta cruciale nella lotta all'evasione, che ogni anno priva il welfare europeo di 824听miliardi di euro di gettito fiscale.

Commissario, Le chiediamo un passo in avanti rispetto all'euro digitale.

听听Ren茅 Aust, im Namen der ESN-Fraktion. 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin! In den vergangenen Jahren sind weltweit die staatlichen M枚glichkeiten gewachsen, uns B眉rger zu 眉berwachen. Der Wunsch, sich gegen diese 脺berwachung zu sch眉tzen, w盲chst jedoch ebenso. Darum erleben Kryptow盲hrungen wie Bitcoin einen solchen Aufschwung. W盲hrend der Coronazeit haben wir beispielsweise in Kanada erleben m眉ssen, wie unliebsamen Regierungskritikern die Konten gesperrt wurden. Manche Betroffene hatten nach diesen Kontoschlie脽ungen nicht einmal mehr die M枚glichkeit, ihre Mieten zu bezahlen. Kryptow盲hrungen sch眉tzen durch Verschl眉sselungstechnologien unsere B眉rger vor 眉bergriffigen Staaten. Gut so!

Dar眉ber hinaus wollen wir, dass unser Geld sicher ist vor staatlicher Manipulation.听Immer mehr Gelddruckerei durch Zentralbanken entwertet das Geld weltweit. Der Euro hat seit dem Jahr 2001 um mehr als ein Drittel seiner Kaufkraft verloren. Darum wollen viele B眉rger eine manipulationssichere W盲hrung. Auch das versprechen Kryptow盲hrungen. Im 脺brigen: Wenn hier gerade davon gesprochen wird, dass Terrorfinanzierung und Drogenfinanzierung durch Bitcoin begangen wird: 90听Prozent aller Terrorfinanzierungen finden nach wie vor durch Dollar oder Euro statt. Wir setzen uns f眉r die Souver盲nit盲t unserer Nationen ein, aber genauso setzen wir uns ein f眉r die Souver盲nit盲t unserer B眉rger. Wir trauen ihnen zu, f眉r sich selber zu entscheiden. Darum wollen wir Neuerungen wie Bitcoin und Co. auch weiterhin zulassen, und zwar so, dass nicht Politiker, die keine Ahnung von diesen Dingen haben, darin rummanipulieren. Die neue Trump鈥慠egierung macht es vor: keine Angst vor Innovation, sondern die Chancen ergreifen. Technologieoffenheit also auch im Finanzbereich.

听听Regina Doherty (PPE). 鈥� Madam听President, colleagues, we have spent the last few months since I've been here intensively talking about the importance of innovation, and it is clear that, despite all of the risks it entails, crypto stems from a desire to innovate and operate outside traditional norms and structures.

In general, legislators and regulators should focus on creating the conditions for innovation and sectors to thrive. But in this case, there's vital issues of trust, consumer protection and there is obviously the serious potential for financial crime that still exists.

And yet, on the other side of the Atlantic, we hear the promises of the new administration of the sector, even as the President's own meme coins were launched and then crashed and lost half their value in the space of one weekend.

I think there are serious questions that have to be asked about a situation where the most powerful politician and one of the richest men in the world can self鈥慹nrich himself through a scheme while purporting to be in charge of the regulators of that particular innovation? And while these questions go unaddressed, the cryptocurrency industry will continue to face serious pushback by some of us in this Chamber and outside.

The EU's legal framework for the sector seeks to promote innovation while tackling market abuse and the very large elements of criminality, and its full implementation has literally only just begun, it's in its infancy. So, I hope that when we eventually come to review and have an international standard, that our efforts will be used for that global standard.

听听Eero Hein盲luoma (S&D). 鈥� Madam President, despite the hurray mood in parts of the crypto world since the election of Trump, it's important to look at the facts. I see at least three reasons to remain concerned about this bubble.

Firstly, despite all the measures adopted, crypto seems to remain the favourite tool for sanctions evaders and gangsters, including cocaine cartels, North Korean hackers, Iranian and Russian spies and fentanyl smugglers. If we want to tackle these problems seriously, let's hit them where it hurts. Secondly, as well outlined by the ECB, the recent rise in Bitcoin value benefits mainly a happy few at the expense of the many. From an investor protection perspective, this is far from optimal. Finally, in times of high energy prices and energy scarcity, investing in infrastructure to mine bitcoins is wasting energy.

Therefore, it is good to have this debate. We indeed need global standards for crypto to tackle these challenges, and the EU should take the lead as MiCA and the AML package can give some inspiration. But we should go further and we need a MiCA 2 to close remaining regulatory loopholes, for example, around NFTs and decentralised finance applications. We count, therefore, on this new commission to pick up this role and push this agenda forward.

听听Aleksandar Nikolic (PfE). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, comme avec Internet, le cloud et l'IA, nous sommes une fois encore 脿 la charrette des grandes puissances sur la cryptomonnaie. 10听% des Europ茅ens d茅tiendraient des cryptomonnaies. En France, ils seraient d茅j脿 12听%, soit plus de 8听millions de Fran莽ais. Et cela continue d'augmenter.

Et vous? Votre premier r茅flexe, c'est d'avoir peur. Ce n'est pas de savoir comment investir dans cette nouvelle technologie, la fameuse cha卯ne de blocs, mais comment la r茅guler, comment taxer les profits de monsieur Tout-le-Monde et comment la contr么ler. Car au fond, c'est 莽a qui vous terrifie dans le monde de la crypto: il 茅chappe aux technocrates. Quand il y a une nouvelle technologie, imm茅diatement vous en avez peur et vous voulez la r茅guler.

Nous, on se demande comment s'y adapter et comment en tirer profit. Nos pr茅occupations sont: pourquoi l'Europe n'innove plus et comment utiliser ces technologies pour booster notre comp茅titivit茅. Plut么t que de taxer, favorisons l'investissement dans l'industrie europ茅enne et l'茅conomie r茅elle, incitons les d茅tenteurs de crypto 脿 transformer les plus-values en actions dans des entreprises innovantes, faisant en sorte que les futurs Nakamoto ou Musk soient europ茅ens et cr茅ent des technologies de rupture sur notre sol. Soyons enfin un continent d'avenir. Oui, il faut rendre la crypto utile et pour cela, il faut se d茅barrasser des technos inutiles.

听听Guillaume Peltier (ECR). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, partout, le socialisme m猫ne 脿 la ruine. Il y eut, certes, l'URSS, Cuba, l'Angola ou le Br茅sil qui se r茅veill猫rent pauvres comme jamais. Mais aujourd'hui, c'est l'Europe que les gauches tentent d'asservir. Pas un jour qui ne passe sans que les politiciens de gauche n'inventent, en France ou ailleurs, une nouvelle norme, une nouvelle taxe, une nouvelle contrainte. Pas un jour qui ne passe sans que les vieilles gauches sur ces bancs ne hurlent contre le m茅rite, l'effort, le succ猫s, le travail. Alors, je le dis 脿 tous ces politiciens: laissez-nous tranquilles. Quand laisserez-vous respirer les entrepreneurs et les originaux de tout poil dont vous sabordez le talent?

Le p茅nible babil technocratique de ce d茅bat sur les cryptomonnaies est le sympt么me d'une Europe en dormition, 茅puis茅e par la fi猫vre socialiste. D茅pass茅e et d茅class茅e, voil脿 l'Europe que vous proposez au monde, transformant la terre de Jacques听C艙ur en mouroir de l'esprit d'entreprise. Pire: 脿 l'heure o霉 le monde entier fait le choix de la libert茅 avec Donald听Trump, Elon听Musk ou Javier听Milei, vous voulez nous contraindre 脿 la rel茅gation. Pourtant, l'histoire est t锚tue. En connaissez-vous beaucoup des gens de gauche qui, 脿 la chute du mur de Berlin, se sont enfuis 脿 l'Est? Le monde entier s'茅veille et vous, la gauche, vous voulez continuer 脿 dormir de vos vieilles lunes ou, pire, vous ronflez de vos imp么ts fatigu茅s. Alors 茅coutez bien: nous ne voulons plus de vous, nous ne voulons plus 锚tre ni tax茅s ni spoli茅s, nous voulons 锚tre libres!

听听Gilles Boyer (Renew). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Monsieur le Commissaire, les cryptomonnaies gagnent d'茅vidence en popularit茅. Elles fonctionnent en dehors de toute l茅gislation financi猫re et dans l'anonymat le plus total. Comme tout instrument de sp茅culation, elles feront la fortune des uns et l'infortune des autres, sans jamais contribuer 脿 l'茅conomie r茅elle. Mais n'oublions pas, et c'est notre r么le, que c'est avant tout 脿 la puissance publique d'organiser la circulation des monnaies en s'adaptant aux nouveaux usages et de garantir la stabilit茅 et l'utilisation de l'euro.

C'est le sens du projet d'euro num茅rique, un 茅quivalent 脿 l'argent liquide dans un portefeuille num茅rique, 茅mis et garanti par la Banque centrale europ茅enne, 脿 l'inverse des cryptomonnaies. Ce sera un moyen de paiement gratuit, s茅curis茅, accept茅 partout en Europe, m锚me dans les zones sans connexion Internet et avec, dans certains cas, un niveau d'anonymat similaire 脿 l'argent liquide. L'euro num茅rique permettra 脿 l'Union europ茅enne de pr茅server et de renforcer sa souverainet茅 mon茅taire dans un secteur des paiements de plus en plus num茅ris茅. Les col茅gislateurs doivent s'y atteler sans tarder, au premier rang desquels notre Parlement.

听听Damian Boeselager (Verts/ALE). 鈥� Madam President, cryptocurrencies themselves are just a technology, but I always have to get a bit careful when I see how excited the far right gets about a certain technology. It reminds me of a saying that I've heard recently, which is that 'not all crypto traders are gangsters, but all gangsters are in crypto'. And now with Trump also launching his meme coin 鈥� which I think had a value of USD听40听billion market cap at some point 鈥� we really have to ask ourselves how we can get better.

The good thing is we already have great standards with MiCA here in Europe, which enables the innovation that we need and fights the misuse and the risks that we can see with people trying to agglomerate power and money without end. So what we need to do now is to really set up global standards. We need to transfer MiCA into global standards so that we can have the innovation that cryptocurrencies can unleash, but fight the risks that are there.

听听Catarina Martins (The Left). 鈥� Senhora Presidente, todas as 茅pocas tiveram as suas bolhas e fraudes financeiras. Hoje, s茫o as criptomoedas, uma burla disfar莽ada de investimento, que gera uma montanha de polui莽茫o sem produzir um alfinete.

Sem surpresa e sem escr煤pulos, Trump acaba de anunciar a cria莽茫o da sua pr贸pria criptomoeda, que ser谩 regida pelas regras que o pr贸prio criar谩 como presidente dos Estados Unidos. Como em qualquer esquema de pir芒mide, s贸 os criadores, como Trump, sair茫o sempre cheios de dinheiro, mas, neste caso, dinheiro real, euros, d贸lares. Os incautos e deslumbrados v茫o perder tudo.

Senhor Comiss谩rio, ao permitir as criptomoedas a pretexto da regula莽茫o, as institui莽玫es europeias est茫o a normalizar a burla, contribuindo para enganar cidad茫os e, ao permitir aos bancos a constitui莽茫o de carteiras de criptoativos, est茫o a criar um mecanismo crescente de cont谩gio aos mercados, ignorando at茅 os avisos do FMI. Na crise do Silicon Valley Bank, j谩 tivemos um cheiro deste mecanismo.

Sejamos claros: regular as criptomoedas tem de ser proibir as criptomoedas, impedir os bancos de as comprar, proteger as pessoas da burla, evitar a pr贸xima crise financeira.

听听小褌邪薪懈褋谢邪胁 小褌芯褟薪芯胁 (ESN). 鈥� 袚-卸芯 袩褉械写褋械写邪褌械谢, 泻褉懈锌褌芯胁邪谢褍褌懈褌械 锌褉械写谢邪谐邪褌 邪谢褌械褉薪邪褌懈胁邪 薪邪 褌褉邪写懈褑懈芯薪薪懈褌械 锌邪褉懈褔薪懈 褋懈褋褌械屑懈, 褉械谐褍谢懈褉邪薪懈 芯褌 褑械薪褌褉邪谢薪懈褌械 斜邪薪泻懈. 袩褉械蟹 锌芯褋谢械写薪芯褌芯 写械褋械褌懈谢械褌懈械 锌褉芯械泻褌懈 泻邪褌芯 袘懈褌泻芯泄薪 写械屑芯薪褋褌褉懈褉邪褏邪 褋胁芯褟 锌芯褌械薪褑懈邪谢 写邪 锌褉芯屑械薪褟褌 谐谢芯斜邪谢薪懈褟 褎懈薪邪薪褋芯胁 锌械泄蟹邪卸 褔褉械蟹 锌褉懈薪褑懈锌懈褌械 薪邪 写械褑械薪褌褉邪谢懈蟹邪褑懈褟 懈 邪薪芯薪懈屑薪芯褋褌. 袛薪械褋 袘懈褌泻芯泄薪 屑芯卸械 写邪 褋械 锌芯褏胁邪谢懈 褋 锌邪蟹邪褉薪邪 泻邪锌懈褌邪谢懈蟹邪褑懈褟, 薪邪写褏胁褗褉谢褟褖邪 写胁邪 褌褉懈谢懈芯薪邪 写芯谢邪褉邪, 写芯泻邪蟹邪褌械谢褋褌胁芯 蟹邪 薪械谐芯胁芯褌芯 薪械芯褋锌芯褉懈屑芯 胁谢懈褟薪懈械 懈 褍褋褌芯泄褔懈胁芯褋褌.

袝褌芯 蟹邪褖芯, 泻芯谐邪褌芯 褉邪蟹谐谢械卸写邪屑械 褉械谐褍谢邪褌芯褉薪懈褌械 褉邪屑泻懈, 褌褉褟斜胁邪 写邪 写械泄褋褌胁邪屑械 懈蟹泻谢褞褔懈褌械谢薪芯 胁薪懈屑邪褌械谢薪芯. 袙褋褟泻邪 褉械谐褍谢邪褑懈褟 褌褉褟斜胁邪 写邪 斜褗写械 懈蟹谐芯褌胁械薪邪 褋谢械写 泻芯薪褋褍谢褌邪褑懈懈 褋 泻褉懈锌褌芯芯斜褖薪芯褋褌褌邪 懈 械泻褋锌械褉褌懈 芯褌 懈薪写褍褋褌褉懈褟褌邪. 袩褉械写懈 胁褋懈褔泻芯 褌械蟹懈 褉械谐褍谢邪褑懈懈 褌褉褟斜胁邪 写邪 褋褗褏褉邪薪褟褌 芯褋薪芯胁薪懈褌械 锌褉懈薪褑懈锌懈, 泻芯懈褌芯 锌褉邪胁褟褌 泻褉懈锌褌芯胁邪谢褍褌懈褌械 褌芯谢泻芯胁邪 褍褋锌械褕薪懈, 邪 懈屑械薪薪芯 写械褑械薪褌褉邪谢懈蟹邪褑懈褟 懈 邪薪芯薪懈屑薪芯褋褌. 袪邪蟹泻谢邪褖邪薪械褌芯 薪邪 褌械蟹懈 芯褋薪芯胁懈 褉懈褋泻褍胁邪 薪械 褋邪屑芯 写邪 蟹邪写褍褕懈 懈薪芯胁邪褑懈懈褌械, 薪芯 懈 泻邪褌芯 褑褟谢芯 写邪 锌芯写泻芯锌邪械 写芯胁械褉懈械褌芯 胁 泻褉懈锌褌芯褌械褏薪芯谢芯谐懈褟褌邪 懈 写芯褉懈 写邪 褟 芯斜械蟹褋屑懈褋谢懈. 袩邪褉懈褌械 褋邪 褋褗蟹写邪写械薪懈 芯褌 褏芯褉邪褌邪 懈 褌褉褟斜胁邪 写邪 褋谢褍卸邪褌 懈屑械薪薪芯 薪邪 褌褟褏. 袧械泻邪 写邪 蟹邪锌邪蟹懈屑 泻褉懈锌褌芯褋胁械褌邪 褋胁芯斜芯写械薪!

听听Kate艡ina Kone膷n谩 (NI). 鈥� Pan铆 p艡edsedaj铆c铆, v谩啪en媒 pane komisa艡i, v谩啪en茅 kolegyn臎, v谩啪en铆 kolegov茅, kryptom臎ny s sebou nesou p艡铆slib inovac铆, ale tak茅 celou 艡adu rizik. Miliony lid铆 v nich vid铆 p艡铆le啪itost, ale bohu啪el je zde i mnoho t臎ch, kte艡铆 kv暖li podvod暖m a nejasn媒m pravidl暖m ji啪 p艡i拧li o sv茅 celo啪ivotn铆 煤spory. A to vy啪aduje od st谩t暖 a jejich instituc铆 velkou opatrnost. Kryptom臎ny nelze apriori odm铆tat. P艡in谩拧铆 nov茅 mo啪nosti v oblasti financ铆, nez谩vislosti i v investic铆ch. Nicm茅n臎 je nezbytn茅, aby jejich rozvoj byl ukotven v jasn媒ch principech. Jedn铆m z t臎ch kl铆膷ov媒ch je i pr谩vo ob膷an暖 platit hotov臎, co啪 pova啪uji za z谩kladn铆 svobodu, kterou mus铆me chr谩nit. Nov茅 metody ob臎hu finan膷n铆ch prost艡edk暖 nemohou v茅st k z谩niku t臎ch st谩vaj铆c铆ch, kter茅 slou啪铆 pr谩v臎 jako pojistka cel茅ho syst茅mu. Kryptom臎ny a blockchain mohou ohrozit nap艡铆klad prudk媒 v媒voj kvantov媒ch po膷铆ta膷暖. Na toto v拧echno mus铆me b媒t p艡ipraveni. Proto vyz媒v谩m k vytvo艡en铆 glob谩ln铆ch standard暖, kter茅 zajist铆 ochranu u啪ivatel暖, jejich p艡铆padn茅 od拧kodn臎n铆 v p艡铆pad臎 podvod暖, transparentnost trhu, pravidla zdan臎n铆 a z谩rove艌 respekt k finan膷n铆m pr谩v暖m ob膷an暖.

听听Kinga Koll谩r (PPE). 鈥� Tisztelt Eln枚k Asszony! Vil谩gszinten n枚vekedik a kriptoeszk枚z枚kbe val贸 befektet茅sek volumene. Ugyanakkor az nem k茅rd茅s, hogy ez a befektet茅si forma k眉l枚n枚sen kock谩zatos. Ez茅rt az ilyen term茅kekkel val贸 keresked茅shez nagyfok煤 p茅nz眉gyi j谩rtass谩g 茅s tudatoss谩g sz眉ks茅ges.

Legy眉nk re谩lisak! Egy OECD-jelent茅s szerint a befektet艖k kevesebb, mint fele 茅rti a kamatos kamat sz谩m铆t谩s谩t, 铆gy azt gondolom, j贸l tett眉k, hogy Eur贸pa megfelel艖 id艖ben a szab谩lyoz谩s mellett tette le voks谩t, 茅s glob谩lis standardok茅rt harcol.

Hiszen j贸l tudjuk a k茅tezres 茅vekb艖l, hogy a p茅nz眉gyi v谩ls谩gok nem 谩llnak meg a hat谩rokon. Az 谩ttekint艖 szab谩lyoz谩st az is indokolja, hogy a kriptoeszk枚z枚k a feketegazdas谩g valut谩jak茅nt is funkcion谩lnak.

Ugyanakkor a t煤lszab谩lyoz谩st is el kell ker眉ln眉nk, mert az sem elfogadhat贸, hogy a szab谩lyoz谩s akad谩lyozza az eur贸pai innov谩ci贸t, 茅s ez谩ltal az eur贸pai v谩llalkoz谩sok lemaradnak a glob谩lis piacokon.

Versenyk茅pess茅g, prudencia, fogyaszt贸v茅delem 茅s a magas standardok glob谩lis kiterjeszt茅se. Ez az ir谩ny, amit k枚vetn眉nk kell, de m茅g ink谩bb a p茅nz眉gyi ismeretek 茅s tudatoss谩g n枚vel茅s茅re van sz眉ks茅g, mert ez a kulcs ahhoz, hogy az eur贸pai 谩llampolg谩rok j贸 befektet茅si d枚nt茅seket hozzanak, 茅s ez谩ltal n枚velj茅k vagyonukat, Eur贸pa vagyon谩t.

听听Aurore Lalucq (S&D). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, Monsieur le Commissaire, chers coll猫gues, parce que sans r茅gulation, le march茅 des crypto-actifs, ce ne sont pas des monnaies, ce ne sont pas des technologies, ce sont des actifs financiers. Ce serait fait d'arnaques, de financements, de pratiques illicites en tout genre, dont celle du financement de groupes terroristes tels que Daesh. Nous avons choisi de les r茅glementer dans un climat hostile, violent, toxique, fait de menaces et de cyber-harc猫lement.

Il est donc cocasse de voir aujourd'hui que ceux-l脿 m锚mes qui nous harcelaient 脿 l'茅poque et hurlaient qu'ils allaient partir aux 脡tats-Unis 脿 cause de nous, se plaignent des pratiques actuelles de l'administration de Donald听Trump, lequel a d茅stabilis茅 le march茅 avec le lancement de son 芦coin禄. Ils sont en train d'exp茅rimenter ce qu'est la loi du plus fort quand elle ne leur est pas favorable. Donc oui, 茅videmment, comme nous l'avons toujours dit, il nous faut des r茅glementations au niveau international. Il faut aussi prot茅ger la n么tre, se renforcer sur la question de la stabilit茅 financi猫re, mais surtout, par piti茅, ne perdons pas trop de temps avec ce d茅bat. On sait ce qu'il faut faire dans le domaine des cryptos. En revanche, on doit avancer en ce qui concerne l'euro num茅rique et la cr茅ation de nos propres 芦big听tech禄.

听听Mathilde Androu毛t (PfE). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, l'essor des cryptomonnaies est un d茅fi majeur pour nos 脡tats et pour l'Union europ茅enne. Ces syst猫mes alternatifs, 茅chappant souvent au contr么le des banques centrales, ne doivent pas compromettre un principe fondamental: la souverainet茅 mon茅taire des nations. La monnaie est un attribut r茅galien indispensable pour garantir la stabilit茅 茅conomique et prot茅ger nos concitoyens.

Pourtant, pendant que l'Europe s'interroge, d'autres pays avancent 脿 grands pas. Les 脡tats-Unis, par exemple, ne se contentent pas d'encadrer ces nouvelles technologies; ils les soutiennent, les d茅veloppent et les utilisent comme un levier d'influence strat茅gique 脿 l'茅chelle mondiale. De leur c么t茅, la Chine et d'autres puissances investissent massivement pour asseoir leur domination num茅rique.

Face 脿 cela, l'Europe ne peut rester fig茅e dans une culture de la surr茅glementation. Certes, il est essentiel de garantir un cadre s没r, transparent et respectueux de nos valeurs. Mais r茅glementer sans agir, c'est accepter de subir. Nous devons changer de paradigme. Investissons dans les technologies num茅riques comme la cha卯ne de blocs, soutenons les entreprises innovantes et encourageons l'茅mergence de solutions europ茅ennes comp茅titives. Il en va de notre souverainet茅 茅conomique et mon茅taire.

Nous ne pouvons pas laisser des acteurs ext茅rieurs imposer leurs r猫gles, dicter leurs normes et nous asservir 脿 des technologies qu'ils contr么lent seuls. Soyons ambitieux, b芒tissons une Europe qui ose, qui innove et qui s'affirme comme un leader mondial. Oui, l'avenir de notre souverainet茅 ne s'茅crira pas dans l'attentisme; l'Europe doit 锚tre forte, visionnaire et audacieuse.

听听Adrian-George Axinia (ECR). 鈥� Doamn膬 pre葯edint膬, un aforism care a devenit celebru 卯n ultimii ani este c膬 regulile fizicii se aplic膬 indiferent dac膬 noi credem sau nu 卯n ele. Parafraz芒nd 葯i lu芒nd 卯n considerare propunerea de reglementare Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) putem spune c膬 aceste monede virtuale vor exista, indiferent dac膬 Uniunea European膬 sau orice alt stat membru crede c膬 sunt bune sau 卯ncearc膬 s膬 le controleze total. Ceea ce nu 卯n葲elege Comisia European膬, 葲ine de ra葲iunea de a exista a acestor criptomonede.

Li se aplic膬 logica unei monede bazate pe 卯ncredere, a cet膬葲enilor sau a pie葲elor. Or, apari葲ia acestor monede virtuale este mai degrab膬 rezultatul ne卯ncrederii 卯n modul de func葲ionare a economiei 葯i al sistemelor politico-administrative complexe. Mul葲i se refugiaz膬 卯n cripto pentru a-葯i proteja valoarea propriet膬葲ii 卯n fa葲a infla葲iei, a turbulen葲elor financiare 葯i economice, dar 葯i ca tentativ膬 de ocolire a unui sistem Big Brother care vrea s膬 葯tie la secund膬 ce face fiecare cet膬葲ean cu banii.

脦n forma actual膬, Markets in Crypto Assets va e葯ua tocmai din dorin葲a prea mare de a intra 卯n intimitatea oamenilor 葯i de a verifica 葯i controla fluxurile financiare. Exact cum s-a 卯nt芒mplat 葯i cu tentativa de interzicere sau limitare a pl膬葲ilor cash.

Abordarea propus膬 de Comisie este deci mai aproape de China, unde tranzac葲iile cripto sunt interzise, dec芒t de un sistem financiar deschis spre inova葲ie. Inclusiv 卯n aceast膬 privin葲膬, Bruxelles-ul ar avea de 卯nv膬葲at de la noua administra葲ie de la Washington.

听听Cynthia N铆 Mhurch煤 (Renew). 鈥� A Uachtar谩in, criptea-airgeadra铆. Forbairt mh贸r teicneola铆ochta, gan dabht, le deiseanna dearfacha ar n贸s c贸ras airgeadais n铆os ionchuimsith铆, idirbhearta trasteorann n铆os tap煤la agus f茅idearthachta铆 r茅abhl贸ideacha tr铆 theicneola铆ocht bhlocshlabhra. N铆or ch贸ir d煤inn san Eoraip neamhaird a dh茅anamh de chriptea. Ach, n谩 ligimis orainn go mbeidh s茅 seo brea 茅asca.

T谩 f铆ordh煤shl谩n ag baint leis na deiseanna seo. Guagacht praghsanna, gn铆omha铆ochta铆 m铆dhleathacha agus easpa cosaint铆 l谩idre do thomhalt贸ir铆. 脕bhair imn铆 dhlisteanacha iad seo a 茅il铆onn freagairt l谩idir shoil茅ir, ach, ag an am c茅anna, n铆or cheart d煤inn rial煤 iomarcach a dh茅anamh ar bhonn eagla na heagla.听M谩 dh茅anaimid nu谩la铆ocht a thachtadh, t谩 an baol ann go gcaillfimid an borradh d铆reach c茅anna a d'fh茅adfadh ceannaire domhanda a dh茅anamh den Eoraip sa gheilleagar digiteach.

Seachas sin, caithfidh 谩r gcur chuige a bheith cliste, ag f茅achaint chun tosaigh agus r茅idh le l煤badh mar a oireann. T谩 rialacha ag teast谩il a chuireann tr茅dhearcacht chun cinn, mar shampla cosaint铆 l谩idre i gcoinne sci煤radh airgid agus cosaint铆 do thomhalt贸ir铆. Ar an gcaoi ch茅anna, n铆 m贸r d煤inn an nu谩la铆ocht a choth煤 tr铆 oibri煤 le nu谩laithe pr铆obh谩ideacha, tr铆 chreata铆 sol煤btha a chruth煤. I ndeireadh na d谩la, t谩 deis ar leith ag an Eoraip anseo le criptea. Ba ch贸ir d煤inn an deis a thap煤.

听听Giuseppe Antoci (The Left). 鈥� Signora Presidente, signor Commissario Brunner, onorevoli colleghi, Europol ci segnala un incremento nell'uso criminale delle criptovalute nel riciclaggio di denaro e per la richiesta dei riscatti dopo gli attacchi informatici.听La blockchain facilita trasferimenti rapidi di capitali a livello globale, offrendo ai criminali un vantaggio significativo.

Nel campo della cibercriminalit脿 emergono tecniche avanzatissime, che richiedono competenze elevate degli investigatori. Tali competenze necessitano di personale adeguatamente formato.

Inoltre, cresce l'uso di criptovalute ancorate al valore delle materie prime, apprezzate dai capi criminali per la loro stabilit脿 e facile comprensione.

La mancanza di strumenti adeguati per il tracciamento delle criptovalute in alcuni Stati membri sta facendo aumentare le richieste di supporto investigativo a Europol.

Di fronte a queste sfide 鈥� e conoscendo la Sua grande sensibilit脿 鈥� 猫 essenziale un impegno coordinato per sviluppare standard globali e condivisi, al fine di combattere efficacemente l'uso illegale di questa tecnologia.

听听Marcin Sypniewski (ESN). 鈥� Pani Przewodnicz膮ca! Noblista Fryderyk von Hayek powiedzia艂, 偶e nie ma odpowiedzi, dlaczego monopol na emisj臋 pieni膮dza jest taki niezb臋dny w dzisiejszym 艣wiecie. I gdy po kryzysie w 2008 roku chronili艣cie banki przed upadkiem, do kt贸rego po艣rednio doprowadzili艣cie, to programista czy grupa programist贸w, znani jako Satoshi Nakamoto, powiedzieli 鈥瀌o艣膰鈥�. Powiedzieli do艣膰 pokusie nadu偶ycia, z kt贸rej korzystaj膮 rz膮dy i banki, do艣膰 psucia pieni膮dza przez jego emisj臋, do艣膰 fa艂szywemu pieni膮dzowi. I w ten spos贸b powsta艂 bitcoin. Jest to najlepszy kandydat do stania si臋 pieni膮dzem. Jest rzadki, podzielny, trudny do podrobienia, a przede wszystkim nie uznaje nad sob膮 dyktat贸w rz膮d贸w i bank贸w. Jest te偶 antykruchy. I wszystkie te zakusy, 偶eby go ograniczy膰, tylko go wzmacniaj膮. I patrz膮c na te wszystkie proponowane ograniczenia, wiem chyba, jaka jest odpowied藕 na pytanie Hayeka. Powiedzia艂 on, 偶e najgorszym monopolem w r臋kach rz膮d贸w jest monopol na pieni膮dz. I te d膮偶enia do ograniczenia kryptowalut wynikaj膮 z tego, 偶e s膮 to niepa艅stwowe 艣rodki wymiany, kt贸re wygrywaj膮 z inwigilowanym, przeregulowanym pieni膮dzem dekretowym. Pami臋tajmy o tym, 偶e pieni膮dz powinien s艂u偶y膰 ludziom, a nie 鈥� elitom.

听听Luis-Vicen葲iu Lazarus (NI). 鈥� Doamn膬 pre葯edint膬, stima葲i colegi, Rom芒nia a fost teatrul unor opera葲iuni financiare absolut tragice pentru poporul rom芒n 卯n anii 90. Scheme Ponzi implementate de tipi care erau manipula葲i de servicii secrete 葯i politicieni au reu葯it s膬 devalizeze buzunarele poporului rom芒n.

Ulterior, sigur, societatea a evoluat. 脦n 2001 au ap膬rut avioanele care au d膬r芒mat blocurile gemene 葯i, sigur, a 卯nceput r膬zboiul 卯mpotriva terorismului. 脦n 2008 a ap膬rut Bitcoin pe fondul crizei din America, criz膬 ce s-a transferat 葯i 卯n Europa, desigur, 葯i ulterior criptomonedele au luat av芒nt.

V-a葲i g芒ndit, poate, c膬 acest imbold al statelor 卯mpotriva cet膬葲eanului de a bloca de葲inerea cash-ului a favorizat acest av芒nt al criptomonedelor? 葮i acum, noi vrem s膬 reglement膬m. A ap膬rut acest regulament MiCA ce reglementeaz膬 anumite lucruri, dar nu reu葯e葯te s膬 fac膬 o diferen葲膬 卯ntre oamenii care au rea-voin葲膬 de la 卯nceput 葯i oamenii care 卯ntr-adev膬r vor s膬 fac膬 proiecte serioase 卯n criptomonede.

听听President. 鈥� (Diana Iovanovici 艦o艧oac膬, off-mic, asks for a blue card)

You are on the speakers' list, so therefore I cannot give you a blue card. It's clear in the Rules.

听听L铆dia Pereira (PPE). 鈥� Senhora Presidente, mais do que exportar legisla莽茫o, a Europa tem de exportar inova莽茫o. Mas vamos ser claros: n茫o fomos pioneiros na tecnologia que suporta os criptoativos e dev铆amos ter sido, mas para criar o regulamento, obriga莽玫es e burocracias, a铆 n茫o perdemos tempo.

脡 evidente que os criptoativos precisam de um quadro legal. S茫o um ativo financeiro, por isso, h谩 m铆nimos de transpar锚ncia e, muito importante, de prote莽茫o do investidor. Mas 茅 tamb茅m evidente que essas leis t锚m de garantir seguran莽a e previsibilidade para quem quer inovar e investir.

Se aqui na Europa n茫o estamos a garantir nem uma coisa nem outra, como vamos defender uma regula莽茫o global? Primeiro, temos de garantir que o regulamento de mercado de criptoativos 茅 bem implementado. Segundo, temos de apoiar a inova莽茫o em blockchain com a consci锚ncia de que 茅 uma tecnologia que n茫o se esgota em criptomoedas, mas que pode e deve ser aplicada noutras 谩reas. Terceiro, temos de perceber que criptomoedas s茫o hoje ativos financeiros como qualquer outro.

Tentar uma regula莽茫o global tem impacto na concorr锚ncia livre, na din芒mica do mercado e na liberdade financeira das pessoas. N茫o podemos viver num faroeste financeiro, quando falamos de criptomoedas, mas tamb茅m n茫o podemos aprisionar novos projetos, novas ideias e novos investimentos que criam emprego e oportunidades.

Este j谩 n茫o 茅 o tempo de desconfiar de tudo quanto 茅 novo, 茅 o tempo de confiar naqueles que inovam, que investem, que fazem futuro no presente.

听听President. 鈥� Let me just be more specific on the rule for blue cards. The rule I used before was Rule 178(10), and the rule states that you're not allowed to use a blue card to put a question to a person in a group or affiliation you belong to. So that was the reason why I was not allowed to give you the blue card, but feel free to use blue cards for other people than those belonging to your own affiliation.

(Off-mic comments from Diana Iovanovici 艦o艧oac膬)

It is stated in the Rules. That also goes for non-attached Members.

听听Nikos Papandreou (S&D). 鈥� Madam听President,听Commissioner, from this discussion I think the answer is staring us in the face.

We have two distinct philosophies, one on one side of the Atlantic and one on the other side. The US is a free market, let it bloom, let's have the $TRUMP coin and then we regulate. Ours is let's regulate and see what happens.

What's happening now is, besides the criminal activities with crypto, it's also used by poor people in countries with inflation. So they put it into crypto, a very unsafe coin, and then turn it back into their currency.

What we need to do is to create the Spinelli coin, which is the digital euro, and to have our own digital crypto competing so that we can impose international standards with safe asset from Europe.

We will not be able to regulate the huge space from the rest of the world, unless we have our own digital coin that people will trust in, not only in Europe but internationally. MiCA helps on that. The way we will impose international standards and MiCA is by having our own innovation and our own Europe.

(The speaker agreed to take a blue-card question)

听听Diana Iovanovici 艦o艧oac膬 (NI), 卯ntrebare adresat膬 conform procedurii 鈥瀋artona葯ului albastru鈥�. 鈥� A葲i vorbit de regulamentul MiCA. Aici avem o regul膬 卯n care se men葲ioneaz膬 c膬 ofertan葲ii sau persoanele care solicit膬 admiterea la tranzac葲ionare cu criptoactive, altele dec芒t jetoanele de referin葲膬 la active 葯i jetoanele de bani electronici, trebuie s膬 fie persoane juridice, s膬 publice o carte alb膬, iar urm膬toarea regul膬 este: s膬 ac葲iona葲i cinstit, corect 葯i profesional. Pute葲i s膬-mi spune葲i, v膬 rog frumos - 葯i 卯n calitate de avocat, v膬 卯ntreb - cum ve葲i ajunge la concluzia c膬 persoana respectiv膬 ac葲ioneaz膬 cinstit, corect 葯i profesional, 卯nainte de a fi 卯n calitatea lor de ofertan葲i sau persoanele care solicit膬 admiterea la tranzac葲ionare?

听听Nikos Papandreou (S&D), blue-card answer. 鈥� If I understood the question, we have two ways of using crypto: one is companies which invest, and the other is individual purchases. Those are two separate entities. The companies that use crypto to invest need to be regulated. The individual using it for purchases is not a legal entity and comes under different rules, if I understood you properly.

听听Ang茅line Furet (PfE). 鈥� Madame la Pr茅sidente, la cha卯ne de blocs et les cryptomonnaies sont n茅es d'une id茅e simple: redonner le contr么le aux individus, renforcer la transparence et garantir un acc猫s 茅quitable 脿 des syst猫mes ouverts. D茅centralisation, transparence et s茅curit茅 sont donc les valeurs fondamentales de cette r茅volution. Mais aujourd'hui, la cha卯ne de blocs va bien au-del脿 des transactions financi猫res. Elle r茅volutionne la gestion des donn茅es, la tra莽abilit茅 et la confiance num茅rique en transcendant les fronti猫res et en appelant 脿 une coop茅ration mondiale. Cependant, avec cet immense potentiel viennent aussi des d茅fis: fraudes, in茅galit茅s d'acc猫s et manque de r茅glementations claires.

C'est donc ici que r茅side notre responsabilit茅 collective. Il faut b芒tir des normes mondiales, non pas pour 茅touffer l'innovation, mais pour l'encadrer et l'amplifier. Ces normes doivent donc 1) s茅curiser les utilisateurs; 2) pr茅server la d茅centralisation; 3) favoriser un cadre propice 脿 l'innovation.

L'Europe, avec des initiatives comme le r猫glement MiCA, a d茅montr茅 qu'une r茅glementation, bien que partielle, est envisageable. Elle doit donc maintenant agir comme un pont pour initier un dialogue mondial. La cha卯ne de blocs est une chance unique de construire des syst猫mes plus justes et 茅quitables. Ensemble, nous pouvons orienter cette r茅volution vers un avenir plus ouvert et prosp猫re.

听听Ond艡ej Krut铆lek (ECR). 鈥� V谩啪en谩 pan铆 p艡edsedaj铆c铆, v谩啪en媒 pane komisa艡i, ke kryptom臎n谩m mus铆me p艡istupovat konstruktivn臎. Od lo艌sk茅ho roku plat铆 na艡铆zen铆 MiCA a j谩 v臎艡铆m, 啪e jeho zav谩d臎n铆 do praxe prob铆h谩 bez v臎t拧铆ch probl茅m暖.

V 膶esku se d铆ky na拧emu poslanci Ji艡铆mu Havr谩nkov茅 poda艡ilo prosadit jak automatick茅 pr谩vo na z艡铆zen铆 bankovn铆ho 煤膷tu pro kryptopodnikatele, tak osvobozen铆 od dan臎 p艡i prodeji kryptom臎n po t艡ech letech. Mysl铆m si, 啪e t铆mto p艡铆stupem by se mohly inspirovat i dal拧铆 evropsk茅 st谩ty. Naopak n谩pady typu zdan臎n铆 nerealizovan媒ch zisk暖 z kryptom臎n, kter茅 sly拧铆me z n臎kter媒ch zem铆, bych opravdu nedoporu膷oval.

Ameri膷an茅 maj铆 k regulaci kryptom臎n odli拧n媒 p艡铆stup, a tak se domn铆v谩m, 啪e dosa啪en铆 glob谩ln铆ch standard暖 minim谩ln臎 v tuhle chv铆li nep艡ich谩z铆 v 煤vahu. I proto bychom m臎li b媒t opatrn铆 s jakoukoli dal拧铆 mo啪nou regulac铆 od n谩s z Evropsk茅 unie. D暖le啪it茅 je, aby p艡ehnan谩 regulace a nep艡edv铆dateln茅 pr谩vn铆 prost艡ed铆 nemotivovaly startupy a dal拧铆 firmy k 煤prku z Evropy.

Pokud se bav铆me o blockchainu, je to technologie budoucnosti, kter谩 nab铆z铆 艡adu praktick媒ch aplikac铆. P艡铆拧t铆 t媒den v 煤ter媒 po艡谩d谩m v Bruselu akci, na kterou bych v谩s cht臎l v拧echny pozvat. Bude na n铆 mimo jin茅 p艡edstaven i projekt 膶esk茅ho vysok茅ho u膷en铆 technick茅ho a p暖jde o inovativn铆 blockchainovou platformu pro decentralizovan茅 vyd谩v谩n铆 dluhopis暖 pro mal茅 a st艡edn铆 podniky. Tak se stavte.

听听螠喂蠂维位畏蟼 围伪蟿味畏蟺伪谓蟿苇位伪 (PPE). 鈥� 螝蠀蟻委伪 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 魏蠉蟻喂蔚 螘蟺委蟿蟻慰蟺蔚, 伪纬伪蟺畏蟿慰委 蟽蠀谓维未蔚位蠁慰喂, 蟿伪 魏蟻蠀蟺蟿慰谓慰渭委蟽渭伪蟿伪 渭蔚蟿伪渭慰蟻蠁蠋谓慰蠀谓 蟿慰 蠂蟻畏渭伪蟿慰慰喂魏慰谓慰渭喂魏蠈 蟿慰蟺委慰 魏伪喂 蟿慰 渭苇位位慰谓 蟿慰蠀蟼 蟽蟿畏谓 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 蔚委谓伪喂 蟺慰位位维 蠀蟺慰蟽蠂蠈渭蔚谓慰. 螚 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 螆谓蠅蟽畏 苇蠂蔚喂 蠀喂慰胃蔚蟿萎蟽蔚喂 苇谓伪谓 魏伪谓慰谓喂蟽渭蠈 蟺慰蠀 胃伪 蠁苇蟻蔚喂 渭蔚纬伪位蠉蟿蔚蟻畏 未喂伪蠁维谓蔚喂伪, 蟺蟻慰蟽蟿伪蟽委伪 蟽蟿慰谓 蔚蟺蔚谓未蠀蟿萎, 蟽蟿伪胃蔚蟻蠈蟿畏蟿伪 魏伪喂 蔚谓蟽蠅渭维蟿蠅蟽畏 蟿慰蠀 蠄畏蠁喂伪魏慰蠉 渭苇蟽慰蠀 蟽蟿慰 慰喂魏慰谓慰渭喂魏蠈 蟽蠉蟽蟿畏渭伪 蟿畏蟼 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎蟼 螆谓蠅蟽畏蟼. 螚 伪蟺慰蠀蟽委伪 蟽伪蠁蠋谓 魏伪谓蠈谓蠅谓 蟽蔚 蟺伪纬魏蠈蟽渭喂慰 蔚蟺委蟺蔚未慰 苇蠂蔚喂 慰未畏纬萎蟽蔚喂 蟽蔚 蟽魏维谓未伪位伪 蟺慰蠀 魏位蠈谓喂蟽伪谓 蟿畏谓 蔚渭蟺喂蟽蟿慰蟽蠉谓畏 蟿蠅谓 蔚蟺蔚谓未蠀蟿蠋谓, 伪谓伪未蔚喂魏谓蠉慰谓蟿伪蟼 蟿畏谓 伪谓维纬魏畏 纬喂伪 苇谓伪 蟺喂慰 蟽蠀纬魏蔚魏蟻喂渭苇谓慰 蟺位伪委蟽喂慰.

螘蟺委蟽畏蟼, 蟽蟿畏谓 螝蠉蟺蟻慰 慰喂 蟿蟻维蟺蔚味蔚蟼 蔚委谓伪喂 蟺慰位蠉 蔚蟺喂蠁蠀位伪魏蟿喂魏苇蟼 谓伪 伪谓慰委尉慰蠀谓 位慰纬伪蟻喂伪蟽渭慰蠉蟼 纬喂伪 蔚蟿伪喂蟻蔚委蔚蟼 魏蟻蠀蟺蟿慰谓慰渭喂蟽渭维蟿蠅谓. 螠蔚 蟿畏 蟽蠅蟽蟿萎 蟻蠉胃渭喂蟽畏 渭蟺慰蟻慰蠉渭蔚 谓伪 蔚谓胃伪蟻蟻蠉谓慰蠀渭蔚 蟿喂蟼 蟿蟻维蟺蔚味蔚蟼 谓伪 纬委谓慰蠀谓 蟺喂慰 蠀蟺慰蟽蟿畏蟻喂魏蟿喂魏苇蟼 魏伪喂 谓伪 蔚蟺喂蟿蟻苇蠄慰蠀渭蔚 蟽蟿慰谓 蟿慰渭苇伪 谓伪 伪谓胃委蟽蔚喂. 螘喂蟽蔚蟻蠂蠈渭伪蟽蟿蔚 蟽蔚 谓苇伪 蔚蟺慰蠂萎 纬喂伪 蟿慰 蠄畏蠁喂伪魏蠈 蟺蔚蟻喂慰蠀蟽喂伪魏蠈 蟽蟿慰喂蠂蔚委慰, 伪蠁慰蠉 畏 谓苇伪 伪渭蔚蟻喂魏伪谓喂魏萎 魏蠀尾苇蟻谓畏蟽畏 未喂伪蟿蠀渭蟺伪谓委味蔚喂 蠈蟿喂 胃伪 蠀喂慰胃蔚蟿萎蟽蔚喂 渭喂伪 蠁喂位喂魏萎 蟽蟿维蟽畏 魏伪喂 蟺位伪委蟽喂慰 纬喂伪 蟿畏 位蔚喂蟿慰蠀蟻纬委伪 蟿蠅谓 魏蟻蠀蟺蟿慰谓慰渭喂蟽渭维蟿蠅谓. 螖蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻慰蠉渭蔚 谓伪 魏伪胃蠀蟽蟿蔚蟻萎蟽慰蠀渭蔚. 螣蠁蔚委位慰蠀渭蔚 谓伪 蔚委渭伪蟽蟿蔚 蟺喂慰 未蟻伪蟽蟿萎蟻喂慰喂 魏伪喂 苇蟿慰喂渭慰喂 谓伪 伪未蟻维尉慰蠀渭蔚 伪蠀蟿萎谓 蟿畏谓 蔚蠀魏伪喂蟻委伪 纬喂伪 魏伪喂谓慰蟿慰渭委伪. 螣 魏位维未慰蟼 蠂蟻蔚喂维味蔚蟿伪喂 未委魏伪喂慰蠀蟼 魏伪喂 未喂伪蠁伪谓蔚委蟼 蟺伪纬魏蠈蟽渭喂慰蠀蟼 魏伪谓蠈谓蔚蟼. 螚 螘蠀蟻蠅蟺伪蠆魏萎 螆谓蠅蟽畏 苇蠂蔚喂 蟿伪 蔚蠁蠈未喂伪 纬喂伪 谓伪 畏纬畏胃蔚委 蟽蟿畏谓 魏伪喂谓慰蟿慰渭委伪 蟽蟿慰谓 蟿慰渭苇伪 蟿蠅谓 魏蟻蠀蟺蟿慰谓慰渭喂蟽渭维蟿蠅谓. 螇蟻胃蔚 畏 蠋蟻伪 谓伪 蟿慰 伪蟺慰未蔚委尉慰蠀渭蔚.

听听Adnan Dibrani (S&D). 鈥� Fru talman! Kommission盲r! Kryptovaluta, som en g氓ng varit v盲ldigt nischat, har snabbt f氓tt genomslag i hela v盲rlden. Det 盲r ocks氓 en digital revolution som 枚ppnat upp nya m枚jligheter inom andra sektorer.

Det finns en stor potential i blockchain鈥憈ekniken som kan inneb盲ra vinster f枚r till exempel offentlig sektor, f枚r mer robusta och effektiva system.听Just nu unders枚ks d盲rhemma till exempel hur vi ska anv盲nda den h盲r tekniken inom v氓rden, f枚r att kunna s盲krare hantera och dela personlig h盲lsodata.

Det 盲r viktigt att vi fr盲mjar ny teknik n盲r den kommer, men samtidigt 盲r det viktigt att den nya tekniken har en viss kontroll. Teknik f氓r inte anv盲ndas f枚r att skada konsumenter, f枚r terrorismfinansiering, f枚r penningtv盲tt och s氓 vidare. H盲r har EU g氓tt f枚re och reglerat krypto. Men krypto existerar p氓 global niv氓 och d盲rav beh枚ver vi standarder p氓 global niv氓, s氓 att vi kan dra nytta av potentialen, inte h盲mma den, och se till s氓 att tekniken anv盲nds p氓 r盲tt s盲tt och inte anv盲nds av suspekta nationer f枚r att skada konsumenter och v氓ra system som vi h氓ller s氓 k盲rt.

听听Diego Solier (NI). 鈥� Se帽ora presidente, se帽or comisario, el Reglamento MiCA, aunque presentado como un avance hacia la regulaci贸n de los criptoactivos, representa una amenaza directa a los derechos de los ciudadanos.

Bajo el pretexto de proteger al consumidor y garantizar la estabilidad financiera, este marco podr铆a socavar la privacidad, la libertad financiera y la innovaci贸n. Imponer est谩ndares globales en un sistema creado para ser descentralizado es, literalmente, ponerle puertas al campo.

Medidas como la recopilaci贸n masiva de datos personales, requisitos de capital inalcanzables para听start-ups y la prohibici贸n de ciertos criptoactivos no solo ahogan la innovaci贸n, sino que limitan la libertad de elecci贸n de los ciudadanos. Adem谩s, la vigilancia y la supervisi贸n excesiva abren la puerta a un control digital sin precedentes.

Mi pregunta es clara: 驴estamos regulando para proteger al ciudadano o para reforzar el control de los grandes poderes econ贸micos y pol铆ticos sobre sus vidas? No podemos permitir que este Reglamento traicione la esencia de las criptomonedas: descentralizaci贸n, autonom铆a y libertad.

听听Andrey Kovatchev (PPE). 鈥� Madam President, Commissioner, dear colleagues, the European tech sector faces challenges that create a perception of stagnation compared to dynamic regions like South鈥慐ast Asia and the US. The EU is a global pioneer in the introduction of regulations such as the MiCA, with the aim to protect customers, but without hamper the growth. Yes, we need global standards, and the EU must be in the lead of this introduction. But also, we need to wake up.

Talent migration is a big concern, with 90听% of the EU tech workers willing to relocate to the US for better salaries and funding opportunities. To reclaim the position of Europe, we need innovation鈥慺riendly policies, including clear regulatory frameworks and sandbox environments for start-ups that will promote prosperity and growth.

The rapid development of cryptocurrency markets highlights the urgent need to educate people on how to navigate the evolving landscape responsibly. Without proper knowledge, individuals and businesses risk falling victim to scams, fraud, financial crimes or malign global players. Europe needs to act now and act fast, if we are serious about our fostering competitiveness, and to act together with the responsible crypto community and not in a war with them.

Are we ready to take bold decisions to ensure our success or will we risk again being left behind as others seize opportunities which we hesitate to explore? Commission and Council and colleagues, we need to act now.

听听Waldemar Buda (ECR). 鈥� Doregulowa膰, przeregulowa膰 i zabi膰. Taka jest regulacja i takie s膮 dzia艂ania Unii Europejskiej w wielu sprawach. Tak by艂o z przedsi臋biorcami, tak by艂o z rolnikami. I teraz dok艂adnie tak samo podchodzimy do blockchain i kryptowalut. Za chwil臋 si臋 oka偶e, 偶e ca艂y 艣wiat na tym zarabia, ca艂y 艣wiat si臋 rozwija, a my nie traktujemy tego jako szansy, tylko traktujemy to jako zagro偶enie. Dzisiaj najwi臋ksze aktywa w kryptowalutach maj膮 Chiny i Stany Zjednoczone, a Europa zastanawia si臋, jak to ograniczy膰? Jak to zwalczy膰? Za chwil臋 miliard os贸b na 艣wiecie b臋dzie mia艂o kryptowaluty.

W Polsce 12% os贸b w wieku produkcyjnym ma ju偶 kryptowaluty. Ja si臋 wi臋c bardziej boj臋 tego, 偶e wy b臋dziecie doregulowywa膰 ni偶 偶e nie b臋dziecie robi膰 nic, bo to pewnie zabije ten rynek i inni b臋d膮 na tym zarabia膰. Oczywi艣cie nieprawid艂owo艣ci trzeba 艣ciga膰, ale rozs膮dnie. Dzisiaj jak w Polsce si臋 pr贸buje to uregulowa膰, to lobby艣ci obsiedli urz臋dy i instytucje i ci臋偶ko cokolwiek zrobi膰. I ci, co maj膮 na tym zarobi膰, i tak zarobi膮. A zwykli ludzie niestety nie mog膮 inwestowa膰 i si臋 w tej sprawie rozwija膰.

听听Caterina Chinnici (PPE). 鈥� Signor Presidente, signor Commissario Brunner, onorevoli colleghi, "follow the money": 猫 questo il metodo per contrastare davvero la criminalit脿 organizzata, come l'esperienza investigativa e giudiziaria italiana ci insegna da oltre quarant'anni.听E "focus on the money" 猫 oggi il motto della Procura europea nel solco di quell'insegnamento.

Quando il denaro si fa virtuale, le sfide per le autorit脿 di regolamentazione e di contrasto si complicano, mentre invece si moltiplicano le opportunit脿 per le organizzazioni criminali: decentralizzazione, anonimato, bassa tracciabilit脿, scarsit脿 di controlli, possibilit脿 di effettuare rapidi trasferimenti di denaro transfrontalieri e di creare catene complesse di transazioni sono solo alcune delle ragioni che rendono criptovalute e blockchain strumenti sempre pi霉 utili per la criminalit脿 organizzata transnazionale e per le organizzazioni terroristiche globali.

In criptovalute si pagano i traffici di droga, armi ed esseri umani e, attraverso le operazioni che le criptovalute consentono, i capitali illeciti vengono riciclati e reinvestiti agevolmente nell'economia legale.

Per questo, 猫 necessario regolamentare il fenomeno. Certo, con il regolamento sui mercati delle cripto鈥慳ttivit脿, le norme sui trasferimenti di cripto鈥慳ttivit脿 e le nuove norme su antiriciclaggio e confisca abbiamo iniziato a farlo, per貌 l'Unione deve continuare a sostenere l'adozione di regole uniformi e standard globali, per impedire alle organizzazioni criminali di sfruttare a proprio vantaggio lacune e differenze normative, arginare il jurisdiction shopping e, cos矛, contrastare davvero il crimine economico e finanziario.

听听Se谩n Kelly (PPE). 鈥� Madam President, digital and cryptocurrencies present an important opportunity for Europe, provided we establish the necessary safeguards. We must strike the right balance between regulating to enhance consumer protection and promote financial stability, while ensuring we do not hinder innovation or impede the financial inclusion that cryptocurrencies can offer.

The MiCA Regulation demonstrates Europe's willingness to lead in establishing best-in-class regulatory frameworks. Recent events, such as the collapse of the FTX in November 2022, have shown why proper standards are essential to protect our citizens from irresponsible, and even fraudulent, market behaviour.

However, the new Trump administration's pro-crypto stance provides an opportunity for us to reflect. We hear from the crypto industry that the US is now becoming a more attractive jurisdiction than the EU, with its regulatory approach expected to be looser than ours. On this I make two points.

One: here in Europe we must approach this industry with the same competitiveness lens we apply to all sectors. It is vital to monitor the impact of our regulations and remain adaptable enough to amend them if needed, ensuring we maintain the right balance.

Two: those in the crypto industry eyeing Trump's America with enthusiasm might reflect on the Trump coin debacle before this week's inauguration. Be careful what you wish for!

Ultimately, the cross-border and decentralised nature of cryptocurrencies demands international cooperation to address clear regulatory gaps, as was stated by the Commissioner and my colleague Markus Ferber. So let us collaborate closely with our global partners to establish clear and enforceable global standards.

Catch-the-eye procedure

听听Niels Geuking (PPE). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin, Herr Kommissar! Die urspr眉ngliche Idee von Kryptow盲hrungen, ein globales und dezentrales Finanzsystem aufzubauen, hatte schon ihren Reiz und war leicht faszinierend, aber selbst der Bitcoin ist heute eine Riesenmogelpackung: 60听Prozent aller Bitcoins werden gerade mal von weniger als 18听000 Adressen verwahrt. Wo ist da der dezentrale Gedanke geblieben?

Auf dem Kryptomarkt insgesamt herrscht dann auch eine Wildwest-Mentalit盲t. Die听Meme Coins sind Betrug mit Ansage. Vom Hawk Tuah Girl bis zum TrumpCoin 鈥� es mangelt schlicht und ergreifend 眉berall an Substanz. Am Ende versucht dann jeder, jemand D眉mmeren zu finden, der bereit ist, mehr zu bezahlen, als man selbst investiert hat. Es ist ein Spiel mit Verlierern und ein modernes Beispiel der Tulpenmanie, getrieben von Profitgier und Dummheit. 2021 sagte Trump selbst noch, Kryptow盲hrungen seien eine potenzielle Katastrophe, gar Betrug 鈥� zumindest, bis er selbst einen Deal machen konnte. Weltweit durchsetzbare Regeln ohne die USA? Schwierig. Dabei braucht es sie, und zwar vor allem f眉r die Technologie und den Fortschritt brauchen wir die globalen Standards. Zur Not ...

(Die Pr盲sidentin entzieht dem Redner das Wort.)

听听Maria Grapini (S&D). 鈥� Doamn膬 pre葯edint膬, domnule comisar, de teama evaziunii nu trebuie s膬 ne opunem inova葲iei. Sigur, criptomonedele sunt rezultatul unei inova葲ii. A葲i spus foarte bine, avem regulament, avem directiv膬, ne g芒ndim la standarde interna葲ionale, pentru c膬 da, nu suntem singuri pe lume, avem o pia葲膬 global膬.

Problema este c膬, din punctul meu de vedere, nu trebuie s膬 obstruc葲ion膬m cet膬葲enii 卯n a-葯i folosi veniturile, nu trebuie s膬 obstruc葲ion膬m 卯ntreprinderile s膬 investeasc膬 a葯a cum doresc, ci trebuie s膬 avem reguli pe care s膬 le respecte.

A葲i spus, domnule comisar, 卯ntre altele, c膬 dori葲i s膬 scoate葲i actorii d膬un膬tori. Trebuie s膬 vede葲i 葯i cum, trebuie s膬 spune葲i ce m膬suri, trebuie foarte mult膬 transparen葲膬. Nu 葯tiu dac膬 ave葲i o statistic膬 卯n Uniunea European膬, 卯n statele membre: C芒te cazuri avem de evaziune, de 卯n葯el膬torii prin criptomonede?

Dar trebuie f膬cute aceste lucruri 葯i cred c膬 trebuie s膬 r膬m芒nem cu aceast膬 inova葲ie -听criptomonede - 葯i 卯n Uniunea European膬, 卯ns膬 cu o reglementare 葯i o supraveghere corect膬.

(Pre葯edinta a retras cuv芒ntul vorbitoarei)

听听Alexander Jungbluth (ESN). 鈥� Frau Pr盲sidentin! Ich glaube, diese heutige Debatte hat wieder gezeigt, dass es unterschiedliche Menschenbilder gibt, die in diesem Parlament hier vertreten werden. Und eigentlich werden hier in diesem Haus immer Debatten dar眉ber gef眉hrt, dass man Dinge regulieren muss, Dinge steuern muss. Freie Meinungen werden 眉ber den DSA eingeschr盲nkt, und bei den Kryptow盲hrungen ist es auch das Ziel, das m枚glichst an die kurze Leine zu legen.

Ich glaube, wir sollten hier an dieser Stelle mal feststellen, dass unser Menschenbild ist, dass wir freie, m眉ndige B眉rger haben. Und freie, m眉ndige B眉rger sind auch in der Lage, sich eine freie W盲hrung zu suchen. Und aus dem Grund, glaube ich, sind Kryptow盲hrungen genau das Mittel, sich gegen staatliche Repressionen zu wehren, sich abzukoppeln von Staaten und einer Europ盲ischen Union, die immer 眉bergriffiger werden.

听听Grzegorz Braun (NI). 鈥� Madam听President, God bless Bitcoin. Thank God for cryptocurrencies.

In this world of oppressive doctrines where people have less and less freedom, this is probably the only way we can survive and get away from this massive criminal fraud that is central banking.

You say greed. You听are greedy with your schemes like the Green Deal, Blue Deal, which are nothing less than overregulation and overtaxation.

So, get away from free people who take financial risks. They have to take it to escape your inefficient and oppressive policies.

听听Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis (S&D). 鈥� Gerbiama pirmininke, komisare G. Braunai, labai malonu pasveikinti ir labai tikrai geras sumanymas ir teisinga linkme. 膶ia vienas kolega kalb臈jo apie Dievo laiminim膮, tai jam priminsiu, kad Dievas ne tik laimino, bet dav臈 Dekalog膮 ir dav臈 vir拧 trij懦 拧imt懦 寞sak懦 ir 寞sakym懦. Taigi, reguliavimas prasid臈jo nuo Dievo. Tai visiems linkiu to nepamir拧ti. Toliau, antras dalykas, noriu atkreipti d臈mes寞 鈥� taip, godumas, spekuliacijos, pinig懦 plovimas, visos 拧itos b臈dos yra did啪iul臈s. Prisiminkite, kas atsitiko su finans懦 krize, kai griuvo didieji bankai. Tuomet su priva膷iais l臈ktuvais va啪iavo gelb臈tis pas k膮? Pas vyriausybes. Kai 寞vyko did啪iul臈s kriz臈s jau su kripto bankais v臈l gi buvo tas pats. Tod臈l i拧ties tie, kurie per daug kalbate apie laisv臋, atminkit vien膮, kai b奴na skaud啪ios pasekm臈s, tuomet ir tenka ie拧koti pagalbos ne kitur, o valstyb臈se ir reguliuojamuose bankuose.

(pos臈d啪io pirminink臈 i拧 kalb臈tojo atima 啪od寞)

听听Diana Iovanovici 艦o艧oac膬 (NI). 鈥� Am v膬zut c膬 v膬 deranjeaz膬 foarte mult c膬 Donald Trump 葯i-a f膬cut propriul Bitcoin. Bravo lui! De ce nu face葲i 葯i dumneavoastr膬? Dumneavoastr膬 sunte葲i cu b膬ncile, b膬ncile opresive! Ca avocat, am v膬zut cum b膬ncile 葯i-au b膬tut joc de clien葲ii lor, i-au l膬sat f膬r膬 case, f膬r膬 p膬m芒nturi, f膬r膬 nimic, oameni care s-au sinucis din cauza b膬ncilor - c膬m膬tari legali.

脦n acest context, bitcoinul - vre葲i 葯i pe acesta s膬 卯l monopoliza葲i, s膬 卯i face葲i regulamente, oricum, extrem de proaste, pentru c膬 niciodat膬 nu o s膬 pute葲i s膬 garanta葲i c膬 o persoan膬 sau o companie ac葲ioneaz膬 cinstit, corect 葯i profesional. 脦n fapt, nicio companie nu poate ac葲iona cinstit, corect 葯i profesional din cauza impozitelor voastre.

Mi-aduc aminte, statul rom芒n, ca s膬 m膬 opreasc膬, 卯n 鈥瀙landemie鈥�, s膬 mai lupt 卯mpotriva m膬葯tii 葯i a vaccin膬rii, mi-au blocat toate conturile 葯i mi-au luat to葲i banii din b膬nci 葯i mi-au dat 30听000听de听euro amend膬. A葯a, ca s膬 fiu controlat膬, s膬 nu mai am cu ce s膬-mi cresc copiii. Bitcoinul este libertate 葯i ...

(Pre葯edinta a retras cuv芒ntul vorbitoarei)

(End of catch-the-eye procedure)

听听Magnus Brunner, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, what an interesting discussion and God bless Europe, I would say. I would like to conclude maybe this discussion by saying that we, of course, remain strong supporters of international standards for crypto. These represent a common set of principles around which jurisdictions around the world can converge.

These standards ensure, at the end, an appropriate policy framework for crypto markets allowing innovation 鈥� yes, that is very important 鈥� to take place while ensuring that risks are appropriately mitigated. And with this EU MiCA Regulation all of you and most of you were talking about, Europe is the first major jurisdiction to achieve compliance also with international crypto standards.

However, the Commission is well aware that our efforts alone, or even a partial international effort, cannot ensure that the risks posed by these global crypto markets are adequately addressed, and it is therefore crucial that the adoption of international crypto standards continues to grow.

The US, that was mentioned as well as a key partner, of course, in promoting the adoption of international standards. We therefore do hope that the new administration will act as a catalyst for further progress in bringing regulatory clarity to crypto asset markets in the United States. And we would expect that any new policy and regulatory developments in the US fully, of course, reflect international standards.

Thanks again for the discussion and for giving the Commission also the opportunity to participate in this very important exchange.

听听President. 鈥� The debate is closed.

Written Statements (Rule 178)

听听Thomas Bajada (S&D), in writing. 鈥� Digital innovation in the world of finance, including cryptocurrencies, enhances competition and provides alternative and more cost-effective ways of financing. It is very possible that EU citizens will start preferring crypto-assets to other traditional methods of payments, in order to have a cheaper, faster and more efficient way to apply payments, especially on a cross-border basis. The EU has been at the forefront on the regularisation of cryptocurrencies, aiming at assisting the market to develop, while protecting users.

Yet risks due to global regulatory gaps persist. This can lead to instability effects on the financial system and high risks for users. Cryptocurrencies represent an international phenomenon that require an international approach to mitigate risks. Despite various efforts, the global approach to cryptocurrencies remains fragmented. It also lacks the needed consumer confidence.

The message is clear: stability is the way forward to make the market more attractive to investors. To that end, the EU must ensure that it continues leading the global effort to regularise the market. This will help the market grow globally, and provide it with the needed confidence and stability so that an established crypto system is safely reachable to all.

(The sitting was suspended at 11:48)

IN THE CHAIR: SABINE VERHEYEN
Vice-President

(The sitting resumed at 11:59)

听听President. 鈥� Following the creation of the standing committees on security and defence and public health, and the special committees on the European Democracy Shield and on the housing crisis in the European Union, the political groups and the non-attached Members have notified the President of appointments to these new standing and special committees as of 23听January 2025.

The list of the committees' members will be published online and in the minutes.

听听President. 鈥� The Renew Group and the non-attached Members have notified the President of decisions relating to changes to appointments within committees. These decisions will be set out in the minutes of today's sitting and take effect on the date of this announcement.

Now I have some points of order. The first is Jordan Bardella. And please, I want to remind you to say to which rule the point of order relates.

听听Jordan Bardella (PfE). 鈥� Je voudrais faire un rappel au r猫glement, s'il vous pla卯t, sur la base de l'article听133 portant sur les d茅clarations de la Commission. Depuis sa prise de fonction, le pr茅sident Trump a sign茅 plusieurs dizaines de d茅crets, montrant par l脿 sa volont茅 d'appliquer sans d茅lai et avec force son programme. Voici deux mois que la Commission europ茅enne est en place.

听听President. 鈥� The point of order?

听听Jordan Bardella (PfE). 鈥� ... C'est un rappel au r猫glement sur la base de l'article听133鈥�

听听President. 鈥� Yes, but this rule is not about conferences outside.

听听Jordan Bardella (PfE). 鈥� 鈥μ齦'article听133 sur les d茅clarations de la Commission!鈥�

听听President. 鈥� But not when it's outside the institution, sorry.

(Applause)

听听Jordan Bardella (PfE). 鈥� 鈥μ齀l me reste 30听secondes, je vais donc aller au bout, Madame, s'il vous pla卯t.

听听President. 鈥� You can ask in the next meeting for a debate and for an oral question to the Commission. But we don't have a debate on what the Commission says somewhere in the world.

(Heckling)

No, sorry, it's not covered by the rule you mentioned. Sorry.

听听Jordan Bardella (PfE). 鈥� L'article听133 du r猫glement int茅rieur sur les d茅clarations de la Commission!

听听President. 鈥� No. A declaration by the Commission is not any speech, anywhere, in any conference. It's another thing and we checked that beforehand. So, no.

听听Carlo Fidanza (ECR). 鈥� Signora Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, intervengo per un richiamo al regolamento ai sensi dell'articolo听215 e dell'allegato听I al nostro codice di condotta.

Ieri abbiamo avuto notizie di stampa, rilanciate dal collega del PPE, Gotink, che ringrazio, 猫 una conferma inquietante da parte del Commissario Serafin: durante lo scorso mandato, la Commissione europea avrebbe stanziato pi霉 di 700听000 euro a favore di associazioni ambientaliste, al fine di convincere membri di questo Parlamento a sostenere con il loro voto le follie green volute dall'ex Commissario Vicepresidente Timmermans.

Saremmo di fronte a un vero e proprio greengate, all'utilizzo di risorse pubbliche per condizionare il voto di questo Parlamento...

(La Presidente toglie la parola all'oratore)

听听President. 鈥� Sorry, I also have to ask you, what is the point of order? Because we had yesterday a debate on that point. You had the opportunity 鈥� with blue card, with speaking time, with other points 鈥� to react to what the Commission said. So we don't have a new debate on what was said yesterday during the debate. I was chairing the debate. I know what happened yesterday.

Sorry, I want to be strict with the points of order, so thank you very much. It's not a point of order for today.

(Applause)

听听Carlo Fidanza (ECR). 鈥� Articolo听215, Lei mi deve far concludere l'intervento.

听听President. 鈥� Sorry, the next point. No, your next point.

听听Carlo Fidanza (ECR). 鈥� Ai sensi dell'articolo听215, proporremo una commissione di inchiesta per fare piena luce su questo scandalo vergognoso che ha coinvolto le istituzioni europee.

Vogliamo la verit脿 su questa vergogna e vogliamo sapere quanti soldi sono stati spesi in maniera irregolare, a chi sono stati dati, per quale motivo, chi hanno cercato di condizionare, con quale esito e se 猫 stato fatto anche su altre materie importanti della nostra legislazione.

听听President. 鈥� We have rules for such committees of inquiry. We will check if there is a possibility, but thank you very much for that.

So we have no more points of order, and now we should move on to the votes. Actually, I see we do have a point of order.

听听Patryk Jaki (ECR). 鈥� Chcia艂em tylko przypomnie膰, 偶e wczoraj, dok艂adnie, z lewej strony by艂y dwa punkty porz膮dku obrad, kt贸re dotyczy艂y sprawy Bliskiego Wschodu. Bez 偶adnego problemu to dopu艣cili艣cie,听...

(Przewodnicz膮ca odebra艂a m贸wcy g艂os)

听听Die Pr盲sidentin. 鈥� Gestern hatte ich nicht den Vorsitz. Entschuldigung.

听听Patryk Jaki (ECR). 鈥� Bez 偶adnego problemu to dopu艣cili艣cie, a nie dotyczy艂o to Unii Europejskiej. A dzisiaj, kiedy m贸wimy o Unii Europejskiej, wy m贸wicie, 偶e to nie jest sprawa Unii Europejskiej. To jest skandal, skandal...

(Przewodnicz膮ca odebra艂a m贸wcy g艂os)

听听President. 鈥� Sorry, I have to make clear: I was not chairing yesterday. ... (inaudible) responsibility if we let actual ...

No, please. No, it's not a point of order.

听听Patryk Jaki (ECR). 鈥� Wy po prostu nienawidzicie demokracji, nienawidzicie wolno艣ci s艂owa...

(Przewodnicz膮ca odebra艂a m贸wcy g艂os)

听听Patryk Jaki (ECR). 鈥� Excuse me,听may I express my point of order? Excuse me, Madam听President.

听听President. 鈥� Sorry. We have clear rules on what are points of order. Some colleagues are very generous when there are actual accidents or things that are happening. But sorry, we have to stick to the points of order, because on Monday we have the one-minute speeches so you can make your position on special issues you want to raise.

But we are here exactly for points of order. And that is what I exercise, clearly to the Rules. And there is no discussion about what has happened yesterday or the week after, or 20听weeks before or later. Sorry, we have clear order to rule it like it is.

(Applause)

听听President. 鈥� The next item is the vote.

听听President. 鈥� The first vote is on the joint motion for a resolution tabled by five groups on the case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (see minutes, item 8.1).

听听President. 鈥� The next vote is on the joint motion for a resolution tabled by five groups on the systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages (see minutes, item 8.2).

听听President. 鈥� The next vote is on the joint motion for a resolution tabled by five groups on the case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria (see minutes, item 8.3).

听听President. 鈥� The next vote is on the joint motion for a resolution tabled by five groups on Russia鈥檚 disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine (see minutes, item 8.4).

听听President. 鈥� The next vote is on the joint motion for a resolution tabled by three groups on the situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10听January 2025听(see minutes, item 8.5).

(The vote closed)

(The sitting was suspended at 12:20)

S膾DI VADA: ROBERTS Z莫LE
Priek拧s膿d膿t膩ja vietnieks

(S膿de tika ats膩kta plkst. 15.00.)

听听笔谤颈别办拧蝉脓诲脓迟腻箩蝉. 鈥� Ir pieejams vakardienas s膿des protokols un pie艈emtie teksti. Vai ir k膩das piez墨mes? Protokols ir apstiprin膩ts.

听听笔谤颈别办拧蝉脓诲脓迟腻箩蝉. 鈥� N膩kamais darba k膩rt墨bas punkts ir debates par pla拧u interpel膩ciju, uz kuru j膩atbild rakstiski un kurai seko debates, un kuru ECR v膩rd膩 iesniedza Charlie Weimers, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Kristoffer Storm, Jaak Madison, Carlo Fidanza, Adam Bielan, Alexandr Vondra, Patryk Jaki, Johan Van Overtveldt, Roberts Z墨le, Emmanouil Fragkos, Georgiana Teodorescu, Geadis Geadi, Marion Mar茅chal, Ivaylo Valchev, Kosma Z艂otowski, Mariusz Kami艅ski, Maciej W膮sik, Dick Erixon, Joachim Stanis艂aw Brudzi艅ski, Beatrice Timgren, Nicolas Bay, Jadwiga Wi艣niewska, Ond艡ej Krut铆lek, Guillaume Peltier, Micha艂 Dworczyk, Laurence Trochu, 艦erban-Dimitrie Sturdza, Tobiasz Boche艅ski un Gheorghe Piperea Komisijai par ES finans膿jumu fiziskiem robe啪u aizsardz墨bas elementiem, piem膿ram, sien膩m, 啪ogiem vai cit膩m barjer膩m, pie ES 膩r膿j膩m robe啪膩m (G-001002/2024).

听听Jaak Madison, author. 鈥� Mr听President, first of all, we are pretty many Members here on the last day of the week.

First of all, in September, on September听20, 30 Members of the 合法博彩网站, so pretty many, have addressed written questions to the Commission. Unfortunately, we haven't got any answer in six weeks. So, c'est la vie, and the result is that we have to discuss the question here.

And I'm even more happy that on this very important topic, we can ask directly from the new Commissioner from Austria, who understands probably very well about the consequences of the illegal migration, about security, about the defence questions.

The question was about the EU funds and is there any kind of consideration in the European Commission to finance also the projects to protect our external borders physically? For example, in February 2023, the European Council implored the Commission to immediately mobilise substantial EU funds and means in order to help countries bolster their border protection capabilities and infrastructure.

Commission President听von听der听Leyen has said that the EU will act to strengthen our external borders, specifically by providing an integrated package of mobile and stationary infrastructure from cars to cameras, from watchtowers to electronic surveillance.

Unfortunately, we understand very well that it's not enough to fight against, for example, the hybrid attacks by Russia, where they are using thousands of people as a weapon against Finland, against Poland, Lithuania, maybe next day to Estonia. And if those people are used by Russia's hybrid attack, how can we stop to move them to Germany, to Austria, to the inside of the European Union, thanks to the Schengen free movement that we have?.

That is why we had only two concrete questions: why has the Commission not yet recognised the reality on the ground at the EU's external borders and moved to lift its anachronistic moratorium on EU funding for physical border barriers?

And secondly, considering the ongoing hostile activities at the eastern border and the Member States have taken to constructing border barriers to counter the instrumentation of migrants, will the Commission change its approach and support Member States' external border barrier projects financially via the EU budget?

听听Magnus Brunner, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Mr听President, honourable Members, thank you, first of all, for bringing this very important topic to the agenda this afternoon. Let me start by saying that I fully agree with the imperative of reinforced management of our external borders. It must be, of course, us and not the smugglers who decide who comes to our European Union and under what circumstances. This is all the more imperative given precisely the hybrid threats you mentioned. Our response must be as united as it is resolute.

Coming from a ministry of finance for the last three years, allow me to start my intervention with some figures. In 2024, we saw a 38听% drop in irregular arrivals compared with the previous year. So it's 239听000 compared with 386听000. And this includes a sharp 78听% drop on the Western Balkan route and 59听% fall on the central Mediterranean route. And that's stated, as you mentioned, by President听von听der听Leyen in her latest letter also to the European Council. This is the result of the EU's active engagement with our partner countries, and it is working. We see that and we must continue to pursue these efforts.

But, as you rightly mentioned, in parallel, we are very much aware that some regions are still under pressure, of course. In particular, there was a threefold increase in irregular crossings at the eastern border, in part as a result, as you mentioned, of the instrumentalisation of migrants by Russia and Belarus in their attempt to destabilise the European Union and undermine also our security. As a response, last month, the Commission issued a communication on countering hybrid threats from the weaponisation of migration and also strengthening security at the EU's external borders. The Commission recognised that Member States can take proportionate, on the one hand, and also temporary measures to address the threat posed by both Russia and Belarus.

Member States have the responsibility, of course, also to maintain law and order and safeguard national security. That's pretty obvious. But they do so with the support of the European Union and also its budget on a European Union level. Those Member States bordering Russia and Belarus have recently received additional funding of EUR听170听million to enhance border surveillance altogether.

This is just part of the broader picture of EU budgetary support to border management. All EU funding for border management has more than tripled over the past three multiannual financial frameworks (the famous MFF), with up to 7.7 billion allocated for border management and also visa instrument in the current 2021 to 2027 period. With these funds, the European Union is building one of the most advanced border management systems in the world and the largest share of this amount 鈥� that's EUR听4.3听billion 鈥� is allocated directly to Member States under their national programmes.

Also the EU's decentralised agencies 鈥� Frontex, eu-LISA, the EUAA, of course, the asylum agency 鈥� they also play a key role when it comes to border management, and their budget for the current period amounts to EUR听9.8听billion. In the future, the strengthening of Frontex with increased operational capabilities, including a tripling of its standing corps, will also further contribute to supporting the Member States 鈥� because that's what Frontex is here for 鈥� in addressing the challenges at the external borders.

I would therefore argue that not only has the Commission recognised the reality on the ground, but it is actively also supporting enhanced border management with substantial means, actually. I would also underline that this remains a key priority for me and for the Commission in general. And we are committed to continuing to strengthen the EU's external borders and supporting the Member States, of course, both operationally and financially, to boost border surveillance.

I am also very keenly aware, however, that budgets are limited, and the EU budget, of course, is no exception here. It is essential to make the most of every single euro, channelling it to where it is most effective at the end of the day and has the biggest impact, of course. Given these considerations, the Commission has so far focused funding, where the needs are the most urgent and where European money can have a real added value. This has included financing for mobile and stationary units, for border surveillance systems and equipment, for refurbishment of border crossing points, new installations for IT systems, plus also, of course, the maintenance of the equipment. All this increases situational awareness on border control capabilities, which are, of course, crucial for effective border protection, combined, as I said before, with continued support and also continued deployment by Frontex.

That is the picture of today: EU funding is available to Member States to provide well鈥慹quipped and also modern infrastructure for a very high level of security at the European external borders and to help also combat irregular migration. These things must go hand in hand. On top of this, Member States can decide, of course, themselves to finance structures such as fences, for instance, themselves, while always ensuring, of course, respect for fundamental rights.

Now, the next step 鈥� and this is very important what I'm going to say now 鈥� going forward, Mr听Madison, and following the trend also observed in the last years, it is clear that the overall needs for border management must be reassessed as part of the preparation of the next multiannual financial framework. This process is currently underway and should of course not be pre-empted. We will, of course, take into account the border management needs we have for the next months and years to come, which must be considered in a holistic manner for the different needs, priorities and resources available, whilst always ensuring that measures are, of course, proportionate and also respect fundamental rights.

The views of the European 合法博彩网站 in preparation of that process are, of course, incredibly important. At the same time, constant engagement is necessary to achieve results on external border management, and the European Union will continue to deepen these comprehensive and strategic relations that it is building with key countries of origin, but also key countries of transit, including migration in the spectrum of key interests covered by these agreements.

听听Lena D眉pont, on behalf of the PPE Group. 鈥� Mr President, Commissioner, I'd like to address the topic of today on two levels: on a procedural one and on a content one.

On the procedure, as a representative of this House, of course, I also need to underline the request towards the Commission to respect the timelines and, of course, to adhere to the timelines. There's a reason why we set timelines for the answering of the questions, and I think that we can do more actually also to work together to come closer again in that sense.

On content, as it is mainly about instrumentalism 鈥� where, by the way, the ECR had the rapporteurship in the previous term听鈥� I think the question here at stake does not necessarily reflect the dynamic in the policy field. The Commission, the Commission President, they are in close debate with the Member States concerned. There are proposals on the table, both with financial support and additional money, but also in the adaptation of the policy response.

As a general remark, Europe is the strongest when we act together and we, as the EPP, will make sure to do so further down the road. And while I say that some here in the House need to accept that there is a thing such instrumentalism 鈥� that it is part of hybrid attacks, and it needs to be seen in the geopolitical context 鈥� other parts here in the House also need to accept that as well, because the very same reason why we are speaking about this cynical, state-sponsored and state-accepted smuggling business is Moscow and Minsk attacking 鈥� trying to pressure 鈥� the European Union.

So at least actors, some here in the House, want to align closer with. I would call that cognitive dissonance, but solve that out on your own. Rest assured that we, as the EPP, will go forward working on a common solution as a European Union that is strong and proud of its roots and values.

听听Ana Catarina Mendes, em nome do Grupo S&D. 鈥� Senhor Presidente, Senhor Comiss谩rio, Caros Colegas, fiquei muito preocupada com o final da sua interven莽茫o, Senhor Comiss谩rio, permita-me partilhar isto consigo.

Em 2021, quando se aumentou a verba para o Fundo de Gest茫o Integrada das Fronteiras, a Senhora Presidente da Comiss茫o afirmou 鈥� e cito 鈥� 芦a Uni茫o Europeia n茫o financiar谩 nem muros, nem arame, nem cercas禄. O Senhor Comiss谩rio terminou a sua interven莽茫o a dizer: 芦vamos aumentar o financiamento para as cercas禄.

E queria dizer-lhe, em nome dos Socialistas e Democratas, que estamos totalmente de acordo que 茅 preciso gerir as nossas fronteiras, mas gerir as nossas fronteiras n茫o significa viola莽茫o dos direitos humanos, como temos assistido frequentemente.

Por isso, as verbas que foram atribu铆das 鈥� mais verbas 鈥�, para as fronteiras, para este fundo, n茫o podem ser para as c芒maras de vigil芒ncia, para as cercas, para os muros, porque isso 茅 ao arrepio daquilo que tem sido a pol铆tica de migra莽玫es da Uni茫o Europeia ao longo dos anos.

E, por isso, Senhor Comiss谩rio, aquilo que lhe queria dizer 茅 que tenha em conta os dados que aqui referiu, que eu, ontem, referi na minha outra interven莽茫o, e que s茫o verdade: em 2024, houve um decr茅scimo da imigra莽茫o irregular em 38听%.

Isso significa, Senhor Comiss谩rio, que n贸s temos de continuar a estar atentos 脿 implementa莽茫o do Pacto das Migra莽玫es e ter uma vis茫o humanista daquilo que 茅 a imigra莽茫o. N贸s n茫o vamos parar a imigra莽茫o com a m茫o, como n茫o paramos o vento com as m茫os, 茅 imposs铆vel. Os fluxos migrat贸rios existem desde sempre.

A Frontex tem sido, muitas vezes, acusada de violar direitos fundamentais e, recentemente, a plataforma para a coopera莽茫o sobre cidad茫os n茫o documentados alertou para a viola莽茫o sistem谩tica, nas fronteiras, dos direitos humanos destes cidad茫os, por isso, aquilo que lhe pe莽o 茅 que continue a ser o guardi茫o dos tratados e a tratar as pessoas com dignidade.

听听Andr谩s L谩szl贸, on behalf of the PfE Group. 鈥� Mr President, EU countries want border walls and other barriers against illegal immigration, and the EU should pay for it. The majority of European leaders demanded that the European Commission immediately mobilise substantial funding for this. This was two years ago and Ursula von der Leyen did nothing.

What did the Commission do instead? They sued Hungary for defending the EU's external borders. For not allowing illegal entry into the EU, Hungary received a EUR听200听million fine. In addition, they demand that we pay a fine of EUR听1听million for each and every day that we refuse to give up our efforts to keep illegal migrants out of the EU.

European citizens don't want a Christmas like in Magdeburg. They don't want a New Year's Eve like in Brussels or Cologne. Europeans want tough border protection on the outer borders of the European Union. The radical ideology of Brussels elites about open borders is a failure. It goes against the will of EU governments, it goes against the will of European citizens and it goes against common sense.

Ultimately, European citizens pay the highest price for it. In 10听years, Hungary has already spent EUR听2听billion to defend the EU's borders on the south. In the east, several countries are now spending vast resources to keep illegal immigrants out.

Pay for the fence in Hungary; pay for the fence in Finland; pay for the fence in Poland and all other countries that defend our external borders. This was the demand of the European governments so that European citizens won't have to pay with their blood.

听听Joachim Stanis艂aw Brudzi艅ski, w imieniu grupy ECR. 鈥� Panie Przewodnicz膮cy! Szanowni Pa艅stwo, od czerwca 2021 roku Polska, 艁otwa i Litwa do艣wiadczaj膮 kryzysu na swojej granicy z Bia艂orusi膮, gdzie dziesi膮tki tysi臋cy migrant贸w i os贸b ubiegaj膮cych si臋 o azyl, g艂贸wnie z Afryki i Bliskiego Wschodu, pr贸bowa艂y przedosta膰 si臋 i pr贸buj膮 przedosta膰 si臋 do Unii Europejskiej przy wsparciu w艂adz bia艂oruskich. Od 2023 roku do艂膮czy艂a tutaj r贸wnie偶 Finlandia. Ju偶 bezpo艣rednio Rosja, bez pomocy swojego pomocnika, jakim jest 艁ukaszenka, tak samo pr贸buje wepchn膮膰 na terytorium Unii Europejskiej nielegalnych imigrant贸w.

Tymczasem nowe rozporz膮dzenie kryzysowe, kt贸re jest cz臋艣ci膮 Paktu o Azylu i Migracji, odnosi si臋 do problemu instrumentalizacji migracji jedynie z perspektywy prawa azylowego i jedynie poprzez zapewnienie bardzo ograniczonego katalogu odst臋pstw od obowi膮zuj膮cych przepis贸w, kt贸re maj膮 by膰 stosowane przez pa艅stwa cz艂onkowskie zaatakowane w ten hybrydowy spos贸b. Oczekujemy jednak, jako Europejczycy od Unii Europejskiej bardziej asertywnych rozwi膮za艅, skupiaj膮cych si臋 przede wszystkim na bezpiecze艅stwie obywateli Unii Europejskiej. Rozwi膮zania takie powinny obejmowa膰 wzmocnienie infrastruktury granicznej, budow臋 barier fizycznych i modernizacj臋 systemu granic, wsp贸艂prac臋 organ贸w 艣cigania i odpowiednie wsparcie Europolu i Frontexu z wykorzystaniem r贸wnie偶 narz臋dzi wsp贸艂pracy mi臋dzynarodowej, w tym skutecznej wsp贸艂pracy z pa艅stwami trzecimi w zakresie powrot贸w i um贸w o readmisji.

Szanowni Pa艅stwo, chcia艂bym przypomnie膰 te偶 o sytuacji, kt贸ra mia艂a miejsce, kiedy ta hybrydowa wojna Putina si臋 rozpocz臋艂a. Byli艣my 艣wiadkami w tej Izbie festiwalu hipokryzji i wyst膮pie艅 zgo艂a kabaretowych. Przedstawiciele nie tylko lewicy, ale r贸wnie偶 PPE atakowali w spos贸b grubia艅ski i skrajnie niem膮dry 贸wczesny rz膮d polski, rz膮d Prawa i Sprawiedliwo艣ci za budow臋 muru na granicy polsko- bia艂oruskiej i za ochron臋 granicy zewn臋trznej Unii Europejskiej. Ba, nawet zosta艂 zdymisjonowany 贸wczesny szef Frontexu, za to tylko, 偶e wspar艂 贸wczesne dzia艂ania rz膮du polskiego. Nie kto inny, jak 贸wczesny lider PPE, sam Donald Tusk, grzmia艂, 偶e migranci zwiezieni przez 艁ukaszenk臋 to biedni ludzie, kt贸rych nale偶y wpu艣ci膰, bo przybywaj膮 oni tutaj w poszukiwaniu lepszego 偶ycia.

Europos艂owie Platformy Obywatelskiej, kt贸rzy dzisiaj zasiadaj膮 w tej Izbie, pajacowali na granicy, atakuj膮c werbalnie funkcjonariuszy polskiej Stra偶y Granicznej, policji czy wojska. A dzisiaj jeste艣my 艣wiadkami cudu. Nie kto inny, a ten sam Donald Tusk wczoraj z tego miejsca m贸wi, 偶e najwa偶niejsze jest bezpiecze艅stwo i wzywa do ochrony granic zewn臋trznych.

Szanowni Pa艅stwo, jego kolega, pan Max Weber z tego miejsca gratuluje Tuskowi odsuni臋cie Prawa i Sprawiedliwo艣ci od w艂adzy i wysy艂a premiera Jaros艂awa Kaczy艅skiego na emerytur臋. Panie Weber, gdyby nie premier Jaros艂aw Kaczy艅ski, kt贸rego si艂a i wola polityczna powstrzyma艂a ten nielegalny proceder, to te setki tysi臋cy migrant贸w mia艂by Pan dzisiaj w Berlinie, w Monachium i w innych miastach niemieckich. Je偶eli kto艣 ma i艣膰 na emerytur臋 to Pan, Ursula von der Leyen i zabierzcie Tuska, dzi臋ki Wam ma ju偶 wysok膮 emerytur臋 europejsk膮.

听听Fabienne Keller, au nom du groupe Renew. 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, cher Roberts Z墨le, Monsieur le Commissaire Magnus Brunner, nous avons eu ce d茅bat de tr猫s nombreuses fois et, en d茅pit d'arguments logiques, factuels, et de statistiques d茅montrant que construire des murs aux fronti猫res non seulement ne marche pas, mais que ce n'est pas non plus dans notre ADN europ茅en, nous y voil脿 encore.

Contrairement 脿 ce qu'aime pr茅tendre l'extr锚me droite, il ne suffit pas de construire des murs 脿 nos fronti猫res pour r茅gler la question de l'immigration ill茅gale. Bien s没r que nous devons prot茅ger nos fronti猫res, nous organiser pour les faire respecter, comme vous l'avez expliqu茅, Monsieur le Commissaire; nous nous y employons. Mais la meilleure gestion de la migration et la meilleure protection de nos fronti猫res, elle passe aussi par l'application de ce pacte, qui n'est pas encore en 艙uvre. En effet, un volet majeur de la mise en 艙uvre du pacte est consacr茅 脿 cette protection des fronti猫res.

Cela passe par la cr茅ation de proc茅dures acc茅l茅r茅es aux fronti猫res, d'un filtrage rigoureux, d'une base de donn茅es sur l'asile et la migration et de moyens budg茅taires suppl茅mentaires. Le pacte comprend 茅galement un volet de coop茅ration avec les 脡tats tiers afin de pr茅venir les d茅parts irr茅guliers, de lutter contre le trafic des migrants, de coop茅rer en mati猫re de r茅admission et de promouvoir des voies d'acc猫s l茅gales. Ce sont ces mesures novatrices que nous devons financer avec le budget europ茅en.

Ce budget doit 锚tre utilis茅 pour rassembler. Il doit 锚tre mis au service des citoyens et de la solidarit茅. Le budget europ茅en, chers coll猫gues, doit construire des ponts, pas des murs.

听听M茅lissa Camara, au nom du groupe Verts/ALE. 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, Monsieur le Commissaire, chers coll猫gues, barri猫res, barbel茅s, divisions. L脿 est l'obsession d'une partie de la classe politique europ茅enne. Partout o霉 des 脡tats ont dress茅 des murs, ils n'ont sem茅 que souffrance et d茅sespoir. Aujourd'hui, une soixantaine de murs pars猫ment le globe de cicatrices de b茅ton. Depuis une vingtaine d'ann茅es, les barri猫res physiques se multiplient aux fronti猫res de l'Union europ茅enne, en Hongrie, en Espagne, en Gr猫ce, en Bulgarie. Ce sont d茅sormais 13听% des fronti猫res terrestres de l'Union europ茅enne qui sont cl么tur茅es.

Les murs, donc, comme seule perspective politique, partout. Regardez ce mur entre les 脡tats-Unis et le Mexique 茅rig茅 sous Bush, toujours plus haut sous Trump, plus de 1听000听kilom猫tres d'acier et de m茅fiance. Ce mur que, chaque ann茅e, des centaines de milliers de personnes cherchent 脿 franchir, pouss茅es par l'espoir d'une vie meilleure. Et ici, en Europe, c'est la m锚me histoire. Ceuta et Melilla, par exemple. Une porte close, des regards d茅tourn茅s. Ces barri猫res ne r茅solvent rien. Elles brisent des vies, elles 茅teignent les r锚ves et tuent. Souvenons-nous du 24听juin听2022 脿 Melilla: le gaz lacrymog猫ne, les balles en caoutchouc, des migrants pi茅g茅s entre les cl么tures, bless茅s, abandonn茅s, sans soins... 23听vies fauch茅es. Et combien d'autres en Europe?

Les murs n'arr锚tent pas les pas. Ils allongent les routes. Ils poussent les exil茅s vers des chemins plus p茅rilleux o霉 l'ombre de la traite les guette. Les murs ne stoppent pas non plus les catastrophes humanitaires et climatiques, les guerres, les pers茅cutions qui ont lieu partout dans le monde. Je l'ai dit hier dans une autre intervention et je souhaite le rappeler aujourd'hui: personne ne quitte son pays, ses rep猫res, sa famille et ses proches par choix. Les murs ne prot猫gent pas, ils s茅parent, ils creusent des foss茅s entre les peuples. Ils nourrissent la peur et la haine.

Puisque les murs ne suffisent pas, d茅sormais, des cam茅ras, des drones de surveillance et tout un arsenal num茅rique sont d茅ploy茅s aux fronti猫res de l'Europe. Mais les gens continueront d'essayer. Leur permettre de franchir les fronti猫res n'est ici qu'une question d'humanit茅 et de solidarit茅.

Cette Europe forteresse n'est pas la mienne. Mon Europe est celle d'un accueil digne et inconditionnel, celle des droits humains et de l'茅galit茅. Jamais nous n'accepterons la surench猫re des moyens s茅curitaires contre les personnes exil茅es, comme la droite et l'extr锚me droite de ce Parlement le r茅clament. Des milliards qui partent en fum茅e chaque ann茅e, pour quelle protection? Pour quel r茅sultat, sinon la mort et le d茅sespoir? Cessons enfin l'apathie morale. L'Europe doit choisir l'humanit茅, la solidarit茅, les ponts et refuser les murs.

听听Christine Anderson, im Namen der ESN-Fraktion. 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident! Europa wird angegriffen听鈥� nicht durch Panzer oder Raketen, sondern durch den Migrantenansturm auf unsere Grenzen, der als Waffe gegen uns eingesetzt wird. Und das funktioniert, weil wir uns von linken Spinnern haben einreden lassen, Pushbacks seien illegal. Pushbacks听鈥� also das konsequente Zur眉ckweisen von Migranten an den Grenzen听鈥� sind aber das effektivste Mittel, um illegale Grenz眉bertritte zu verhindern und diesen Angriff auf unsere Heimatl盲nder abzuwehren.

Dass wir sie nicht nutzen d眉rfen, verdanken wir einer massiven Lobbyarbeit von Pro-Migrations-NGOs, finanziert von exzentrischen Milliard盲ren, die sich als moralische Instanz aufspielen. Tats盲chlich aber gef盲hrdet deren Agenda nicht nur die Sicherheit Europas, sondern Europa an sich. Jedes souver盲ne Land hat das Recht, ja, die Pflicht, seine Grenzen zu sch眉tzen. Die Behauptung, dass dies rechtswidrig sei, ist eine dreiste L眉ge, die Europa jeder M枚glichkeit der Selbstverteidigung beraubt.

Und nat眉rlich brauchen wir physische Barrieren an den Au脽engrenzen听鈥� sie wirken, sie sch眉tzen, sind legal und legitim. Diese Z盲une und Mauern sind nichts anderes als ein in Stacheldraht und Beton gegossener Pushback. Also bauen wir sie endlich, diese physischen Barrieren, und sch眉tzen wir endlich unsere Heimatl盲nder und unsere B眉rger.

Auch Sie, Herr Kommissar Brunner, sollten doch inzwischen zur Kenntnis genommen haben, dass die politische Landschaft im Wandel ist. Ihre christdemokratische Partei wird bald Juniorpartner der FP脰 sein. Sie werden Ihren Kurs ohnehin 盲ndern m眉ssen. Warum nicht jetzt? Und wenn nicht jetzt, wann dann?

Aber die n盲chsten Wahlen werden ohnehin zeigen, dass die B眉rger keine Parteien mehr w盲hlen werden, die sich weigern, die Grenzen zu sch眉tzen. Sie werden keine Parteien mehr w盲hlen, die die Sicherheit der eigenen B眉rger auf dem Altar imagin盲rer Rechte und Anspr眉che von Millionen von r眉ckst盲ndigen Masseninvasoren opfern und听鈥� mehr noch听鈥� sie ihnen erbarmungslos zum Fra脽 vorwerfen.

Kommen Sie endlich zur Besinnung. Handeln Sie听鈥� und zwar entschieden und jetzt!

听听桅蟻苇谓蟿畏蟼 螠蟺蔚位苇蟻畏蟼 (PPE). 鈥� 螝蠉蟻喂蔚 螤蟻蠈蔚未蟻蔚, 魏蠉蟻喂蔚 螘蟺委蟿蟻慰蟺蔚, 伪纬伪蟺畏蟿慰委 蟽蠀谓维未蔚位蠁慰喂, 畏 蠂蟻畏渭伪蟿慰未蠈蟿畏蟽畏 蠁蠀蟽喂魏蠋谓 蠀蟺慰未慰渭蠋谓 蟺蟻慰蟽蟿伪蟽委伪蟼 蟿蠅谓 蟽蠀谓蠈蟻蠅谓 蔚委谓伪喂 渭喂伪 位蠉蟽畏 蟺慰蠀 伪蟺慰未蔚未蔚喂纬渭苇谓伪 位蔚喂蟿慰蠀蟻纬蔚委. 危蟿畏 蠂蠋蟻伪 渭慰蠀 蟿慰 蟺喂慰 伪蟺慰蟿蔚位蔚蟽渭伪蟿喂魏蠈 渭苇蟽慰 伪蟺慰蟿蟻慰蟺萎蟼 蟺伪蟻维谓慰渭蠅谓 未喂蔚位蔚蠉蟽蔚蠅谓 蔚委谓伪喂 慰 蠁蟻维蠂蟿畏蟼 蟿慰蠀 螆尾蟻慰蠀. 螤蟻蠋蟿慰谓, 纬喂伪蟿委 胃蠅蟻伪魏委味蔚喂 蟿伪 蟽蠉谓慰蟻伪 蟿畏蟼 螘位位维未伪蟼 伪位位维 魏伪喂 蟿畏蟼 螆谓蠅蟽畏蟼. 螖蔚蠉蟿蔚蟻慰谓, 纬喂伪蟿委 蟺蟻慰蟽蟿维蟿蔚蠄蔚 蟿畏谓 螘位位维未伪 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏 伪蟺蠈 蟿畏谓 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺维胃蔚喂伪 蔚蟻纬伪位蔚喂慰蟺慰委畏蟽畏蟼 蟿慰蠀 渭蔚蟿伪谓伪蟽蟿蔚蠀蟿喂魏慰蠉 伪蟺蠈 蟿畏谓 韦慰蠀蟻魏委伪. 韦蟻委蟿慰谓, 蠅胃蔚委 蟿慰蠀蟼 渭蔚蟿伪谓维蟽蟿蔚蟼 蟽蟿喂蟼 谓蠈渭喂渭蔚蟼 慰未慰蠉蟼 蔚喂蟽蠈未慰蠀 魏伪喂 蟺蟻慰蟽蟿伪蟿蔚蠉蔚喂 蟿伪 未喂魏伪喂蠋渭伪蟿伪 蠈位蠅谓 伪蠀蟿蠋谓 蟺慰蠀 未苇蠂慰谓蟿伪喂 魏伪胃畏渭蔚蟻喂谓维 蟿喂蟼 蟺喂苇蟽蔚喂蟼 蟿慰蠀 渭蔚蟿伪谓伪蟽蟿蔚蠀蟿喂魏慰蠉. 螒蠀蟿慰委 蔚委谓伪喂 慰喂 伪魏蟻委蟿蔚蟼 蔚蠀蟻蠅蟺伪委慰喂 蟺慰位委蟿蔚蟼 蟿慰蠀 螆尾蟻慰蠀. 螘委谓伪喂 伪蠀蟿慰委 蟺慰蠀 蟽畏魏蠋谓慰蠀谓 未喂伪蠂蟻慰谓喂魏维 蟺慰位蠉 渭蔚纬伪位蠉蟿蔚蟻慰 尾维蟻慰蟼 伪蟺蠈 蠈位慰蠀蟼 蔚渭维蟼. 螘委谓伪喂 蟺喂慰 魏蟻委蟽喂渭慰 伪蟺蠈 蟺慰蟿苇 谓伪 蟿慰蠀蟼 未蔚委尉慰蠀渭蔚 蠈蟿喂 未蔚谓 蔚委谓伪喂 渭蠈谓慰喂 蟿慰蠀蟼.

螚 蟽蠀味萎蟿畏蟽畏 纬喂伪 蟿慰 渭蔚蟿伪谓伪蟽蟿蔚蠀蟿喂魏蠈 蔚委谓伪喂 蟺维谓蟿慰蟿蔚 喂未蔚慰位慰纬喂魏维 蠁慰蟻蟿喂蟽渭苇谓畏, 纬喂伪蟿委 苇蠂蔚喂 谓伪 魏维谓蔚喂 渭蔚 蟿畏谓 蟺蟻慰蟽蟿伪蟽委伪 蟿蠅谓 伪蟿慰渭喂魏蠋谓 未喂魏伪喂蠅渭维蟿蠅谓 魏伪喂 蔚位蔚蠀胃蔚蟻喂蠋谓, 蠈蠂喂 渭蠈谓慰 蟿蠅谓 渭蔚蟿伪谓伪蟽蟿蠋谓 伪位位维 魏伪喂 蟿蠅谓 蟺慰位喂蟿蠋谓 蟿畏蟼 螆谓蠅蟽萎蟼 渭伪蟼. 危蟿畏谓 蟺蟻慰畏纬慰蠉渭蔚谓畏 魏慰喂谓慰尾慰蠀位蔚蠀蟿喂魏萎 蟺蔚蟻委慰未慰 未蔚谓 伪蠁萎蟽伪渭蔚 蟿喂蟼 喂未蔚慰位畏蠄委蔚蟼 慰蟻喂蟽渭苇谓蠅谓 谓伪 未喂伪尾蟻蠋蟽慰蠀谓 蟿喂蟼 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏苇蟼 蠁蠉位伪尉畏蟼 蟿蠅谓 蟽蠀谓蠈蟻蠅谓. 韦慰 委未喂慰 慰蠁蔚委位慰蠀渭蔚 谓伪 魏维谓慰蠀渭蔚 魏伪喂 蟿蠋蟻伪. 螚 蟽蠀谓苇蠂喂蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 蠂蟻畏渭伪蟿慰未蠈蟿畏蟽畏蟼 蔚委谓伪喂 渭委伪 伪蟺蠈 蟿喂蟼 蔚谓苇蟻纬蔚喂蔚蟼 蟺慰蠀 尉蔚魏伪胃伪蟻委味蔚喂 蟿畏谓 伪蟺慰蠁伪蟽喂蟽蟿喂魏蠈蟿畏蟿伪 蟿畏蟼 螘蠀蟻蠋蟺畏蟼 蟺蟻慰蟼 蟿畏 谓苇伪 蔚蟺慰蠂萎.

听听Murielle Laurent (S&D). 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, Monsieur le Commissaire, chers coll猫gues, 芦structures physiques de protection des fronti猫res禄, il s'agit l脿 du titre de ce d茅bat. Ce n'est en r茅alit茅 que du verbiage politiquement correct pour parler de murs, de barri猫res, de barbel茅s. Cette s茅mantique nous renvoie 脿 une p茅riode bien sombre de notre histoire.

La Communaut茅 europ茅enne a 茅t茅 b芒tie sur un id茅al de paix, d'union et d'ouverture. Notre but n'est pas d'茅riger des murs, mais de les faire tomber, comme ce fut le cas le听9听novembre听1989 avec la chute du mur de Berlin. Financer de telles infrastructures serait une insulte 脿 la construction europ茅enne. Plut么t que de construire des murs, nous devrions consacrer notre budget 脿 d茅fendre la d茅mocratie, menac茅e par les populistes et non par les migrants. Comme je l'ai dit hier, ici m锚me, lors du d茅bat sur les liens entre la criminalit茅 et la migration: il n'y a qu'en assumant une migration positive, en mettant en place des voies l茅gales de migration et en engageant des partenariats s茅rieux avec les autres pays que nous pourrons y parvenir. Non, ce ne sont pas des idioties, c'est du bon sens. Le respect des droits fondamentaux, c'est du bon sens.

听听France Jamet (PfE). 鈥� Monsieur le Pr茅sident, 30听000 personnes. 30听000 personnes sont mortes en tentant de traverser la M茅diterran茅e, 脿 la poursuite d'un eldorado fictif, 脿 la poursuite d'un eldorado que vous leur avez vendu. Ces morts tragiques, elles ne sont pas 脿 mettre sur le compte de la lutte contre l'immigration ill茅gale, mais sur celui de votre id茅ologie sans-fronti茅riste, des pompes aspirantes que vous avez mises en place et de votre mansu茅tude vis-脿-vis des r茅seaux mafieux de passeurs. On voit d'ailleurs 脿 Mayotte, sur notre sol, aujourd'hui, le r茅sultat de cette politique du laissez-faire.

Alors c'est vrai, construire des infrastructures pour stopper cette pression migratoire, qui p猫se sur nos comptes publics, notre 茅conomie et la s茅curit茅 de nos compatriotes, ne sera pas suffisant sans un arsenal juridique et la volont茅 politique. Pour cela, il faut d'abord avoir le courage de dire: 芦Sachez que si vous entrez ill茅galement sur notre territoire, ce sera l'expulsion et le retour.禄

听听Riho Terras (PPE). 鈥� Mr听President, colleagues, authoritarian regimes surrounding the Union have used migration as a tool to impose political and economic pressure.

The Member States and the eastern flank have been under pressure from the Russian regime and confronted with immigration attacks for several years now. It is our united and coordinated task to defend our borders against the attempts of weaponized migration and stop the illegal immigration entering the EU.

I strongly support more EU鈥慺unded initiatives to strengthen our external borders and the use of the EU budget to build fences, as Commissioner听Brunner mentioned, I support very much.听We need to invest to improve physical infrastructure as well as into innovative solutions.

I am also glad that the Frontex is preparing to open a permanent base in Estonia and increase its presence along the EU's eastern borders to combat migration.

Br墨vais mikrofons

听听Kinga Koll谩r (PPE). 鈥� Tisztelt Eln枚k 脷r! Eur贸p谩t csak mi, eur贸paiak tudjuk megv茅deni. K眉ls艖 hat谩rainkat meg kell er艖s铆teni az illeg谩lis migr谩ci贸val 茅s a hat谩rokon 谩tny煤l贸 b疟n枚z茅ssel szemben.

A Tisza azt akarja, hogy a magyar emberek biztons谩gban 茅ljenek. Nem akarunk illeg谩lis migr谩nsokat, b疟nszervezeteket, szabadon engedett embercsemp茅szeket se Magyarorsz谩gon, se m谩s uni贸s tag谩llamban.

A meger艖s铆tett hat谩rv茅delem az EU k枚z枚s 茅rdeke, 铆gy az erre ford铆tott k枚lts茅gek megt茅r铆t茅s茅t joggal k茅rik az 茅rintett tag谩llamok. A Tisza s眉rgeti, hogy az EU k枚lts茅gvet茅se is t谩mogassa a hat茅kony fizikai hat谩rv茅delmet, 茅s ebb艖l jusson 煤j 茅s megl茅v艖 hat谩rv茅delmi eszk枚z枚kre is.

听听Bogdan Rzo艅ca (ECR). 鈥� Panie Przewodnicz膮cy! Chcia艂em zabra膰 g艂os, 偶eby odda膰 ho艂d 21 letniemu Mateuszowi Sitkowi. Polski 偶o艂nierz, 21 letni 偶o艂nierz, zosta艂 zabity przez bandyt贸w na granicy polsko-bia艂oruskiej. Zabity, zamordowany. I chc臋 o tym tu powiedzie膰, bo wtedy, kiedy my, Polacy, bronili艣my granicy Unii Europejskiej, kiedy Putin i 艁ukaszenka wpycha艂 uchod藕c贸w do Polski, prowadz膮c wojn臋 hybrydow膮, wy 艣wietnie tu bawili艣cie si臋 w Parlamencie Europejskim na fa艂szywym filmie polskiej re偶yserki, kt贸ra o艣miesza艂a polsk膮 policj臋, polskich 偶o艂nierzy, tych wszystkich, kt贸rzy bronili granicy Unii Europejskiej.

Musicie si臋 za to wstydzi膰. B臋d臋 wam o tym zawsze przypomina艂, dlatego 偶e dzisiaj oczywi艣cie ta debata jest wa偶na, ciesz臋 si臋, 偶e komisarz przyj膮艂 takie, a nie inne stanowisko, ale wo艂ali艣my o te pieni膮dze na granicy, o to bezpiecze艅stwo w poprzednich latach i si臋 nie udawa艂o. A wczoraj oklaskiwali艣cie Donalda Tuska, kt贸ry tutaj, w Brukseli, powiedzia艂 tak: To, co robi polski rz膮d Prawa i Sprawiedliwo艣ci, to szpetna propaganda. A my艣my po prostu zwyczajnie bronili granicy Unii Europejskiej.听(przewodnicz膮cy odebra艂 m贸wcy g艂os)

(Przewodnicz膮cy przerwa艂 m贸wcy)

听听Siegbert Frank Droese (ESN). 鈥� Herr Pr盲sident! Ich hatte selber die Gelegenheit, als Bundestagsabgeordneter die litauische Au脽engrenze, die bulgarische Au脽engrenze zu besuchen, und es gab immer Kritik an den Finanzierungsm枚glichkeiten durch die EU, dass eben zu viel humanit盲re Ma脽nahmen gef枚rdert wurden, aber kein robuster Grenzschutz. Insofern sind die Ausf眉hrungen von Politkommissar Brunner ein kleiner Fortschritt.

Alleine mir fehlt der Glaube an den Willen. Wir brauchen den Willen zur Festung Europa. Wir brauchen einen, wenn Sie so wollen, neuen Eisernen Vorhang an den Au脽engrenzen Europas. Aber wir brauchen auch im Inneren Europas Ordnung. Wir werden daher nicht umhin kommen, Millionen von Straft盲tern und illegalen Migranten auszuweisen. Also wir brauchen millionenfache Remigration innerhalb Europas.

Und das ist leider in Ihren Worten, Herr Politkommissar Brunner, 眉berhaupt nicht vorgekommen. Solange dieses Thema nicht zentral als Aufgabe von Ihnen angesehen wird, kann ich leider Ihren sch枚nen Worten keinen Glauben schenken.

(Br墨v膩 mikrofona uzst膩拧anos beigas.)

听听Magnus Brunner, Member of the Commission. 鈥� Mr听President, ladies and gentlemen, honourable Members, thank you very much, first of all, for your interventions.

Border protection, I think we all agree, is a shared responsibility. We know the dimension of the challenge, definitely. And we will continue to dedicate also massive resources to meet it in cooperation, of course, with national authorities, with the EU agencies dealing with the topic, and with partner countries of origin and also of transit, as I said in my former statement.

EU funds will have a strong role to play in this, and the preparation of the next MFF will be the moment to reassess the needs for border management and how these can be better addressed, whilst always ensuring 鈥� and this is also very important 鈥� that measures are proportionate and of course respect fundamental rights.

I stand ready to engage with you on this in the weeks to come. I think that is very important. And I stand, of course, also ready to listen to you all.

听听President. 鈥� Thank you very much, Commissioner.

The debate is closed.

Rakstiski pazi艈ojumi (178. pants)

听听Mariusz Kami艅ski (ECR), na pi艣mie. 鈥� Ochrona granic to fundament bezpiecze艅stwa narodowego. Niestety, pomimo kolejnych kryzys贸w na granicach zewn臋trznych, ideologiczne podej艣cie Komisji wci膮偶 g贸ruje nad zdrowym rozs膮dkiem. Komisja nadal nie uznaje reali贸w panuj膮cych na zewn臋trznych granicach UE i nie znosi swojego anachronicznego moratorium na finansowanie przez Uni臋 fizycznych barier granicznych. Nawet gdy Putin, planuj膮c agresj臋 na Ukrain臋, stara艂 si臋 destabilizowa膰 Europ臋 zalewem migrant贸w, Komisja nie zmieni艂a tej postawy. To rz膮d Prawa i Sprawiedliwo艣ci, broni膮c granicy i buduj膮c zapor臋, uratowa艂 w贸wczas Europ臋 przed chaosem, pomimo atak贸w ze strony Brukseli i wspieranej przez ni膮 贸wczesnej opozycji. S艂yszeli艣my w贸wczas, i偶 nielegalne przekraczanie granicy to prawo, a nie przest臋pstwo. Pilnowa膰 tego prawa mieli urz臋dnicy Frontexu.

W obliczu trwaj膮cego od blisko 4 lat kryzysu, gdy na polsko-bia艂oruskiej granicy z r膮k przest臋pcy zgin膮艂 polski 偶o艂nierz, wci膮偶 m贸wi Pan o odleg艂ych planach, kolejnych przegl膮dach, o pracach nad nowym bud偶etem na lata 2028-2034. Jakim kontrastem do zaniecha艅 Brukseli s膮 zdecydowane dzia艂ania nowej administracji ameryka艅skiej?

Ostatnie negocjacje nad sprawozdaniem w sprawie bud偶etu Unii, do kt贸rego z艂o偶y艂em poprawk臋 o finansowaniu przez UE infrastruktury fizycznej na granicach zewn臋trznych, udowodni艂y, 偶e w Parlamencie mo偶na zbudowa膰 wi臋kszo艣膰 opowiadaj膮c膮 si臋 za zdrowym rozs膮dkiem. Taka wi臋kszo艣膰 jest r贸wnie偶 obecna w Radzie. Niestety nowej Komisji wci膮偶 brakuje odwagi, by znie艣膰 szkodliwe moratorium.

听听袝屑懈谢 袪邪写械胁 (PPE), 胁 锌懈褋屑械薪邪 褎芯褉屑邪. 鈥� 袩芯谢懈褌懈褔械褋泻邪褌邪 谐褉褍锌邪 薪邪 袝袧袩 褌胁褗褉写芯 锌芯写泻褉械锌褟 褎懈薪邪薪褋懈褉邪薪械褌芯 芯褌 袝小 薪邪 褎懈蟹懈褔械褋泻懈 褋褗芯褉褗卸械薪懈褟 蟹邪 谐褉邪薪懈褔薪邪 蟹邪褖懈褌邪, 泻邪褌芯 褋褌械薪懈, 芯谐褉邪写懈 懈 写褉褍谐懈 斜邪褉懈械褉懈, 泻邪褌芯 薪械芯斜褏芯写懈屑邪 懈 械褎械泻褌懈胁薪邪 屑褟褉泻邪 蟹邪 蟹邪褖懈褌邪 薪邪 胁褗薪褕薪懈褌械 谐褉邪薪懈褑懈 薪邪 小褗褞蟹邪. 袙 褍褋谢芯胁懈褟褌邪 薪邪 斜械蟹锌褉械褑械写械薪褌械薪 屑懈谐褉邪褑懈芯薪械薪 薪邪褌懈褋泻, 芯褉谐邪薪懈蟹懈褉邪薪邪 锌褉械褋褌褗锌薪芯褋褌 懈 蟹邪锌谢邪褏懈 蟹邪 褋懈谐褍褉薪芯褋褌褌邪, 褋褌邪斜懈谢薪邪褌邪 谐褉邪薪懈褔薪邪 懈薪褎褉邪褋褌褉褍泻褌褍褉邪 械 芯褌 泻谢褞褔芯胁芯 蟹薪邪褔械薪懈械 蟹邪 蟹邪褖懈褌邪褌邪 薪邪 械胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻懈褌械 谐褉邪卸写邪薪懈, 锌芯写写褗褉卸邪薪械褌芯 薪邪 芯斜褖械褋褌胁械薪懈褟 褉械写 懈 蟹邪锌邪蟹胁邪薪械褌芯 薪邪 褑械谢芯褋褌褌邪 薪邪 楔械薪谐械薪褋泻芯褌芯 锌褉芯褋褌褉邪薪褋褌胁芯. 袠薪胁械褋褌懈褑懈懈褌械 胁褗胁 褎懈蟹懈褔械褋泻懈 斜邪褉懈械褉懈 谐邪褉邪薪褌懈褉邪褌, 褔械 袝胁褉芯锌邪 芯褋褌邪胁邪 褋懈谐褍褉薪芯 屑褟褋褌芯, 锌褉械写芯褌胁褉邪褌褟胁邪泄泻懈 薪械蟹邪泻芯薪薪邪褌邪 屑懈谐褉邪褑懈褟, 胁褗蟹锌懈褉邪泄泻懈 泻邪薪邪谢懈褌械 蟹邪 褌褉邪褎懈泻 薪邪 褏芯褉邪 懈 芯谐褉邪薪懈褔邪胁邪泄泻懈 薪械谢械谐邪谢薪懈褌械 锌褉械屑懈薪邪胁邪薪懈褟.

袗蟹 褋褗褖芯 褋褗屑 褍斜械写械薪, 褔械 褋懈谢薪懈褌械 谐褉邪薪懈褑懈 褋邪 锌褉械写锌芯褋褌邪胁泻邪 蟹邪 械褎械泻褌懈胁薪邪 褋懈褋褌械屑邪 蟹邪 褍斜械卸懈褖械 懈 屑懈谐褉邪褑懈褟, 泻芯褟褌芯 写邪胁邪 胁褗蟹屑芯卸薪芯褋褌 薪邪 袝小 写邪 褋械 褋褗褋褉械写芯褌芯褔懈 胁褗褉褏褍 褌械蟹懈, 泻芯懈褌芯 薪邪懈褋褌懈薪邪 褋械 薪褍卸写邪褟褌 芯褌 蟹邪褖懈褌邪, 泻邪褌芯 褋褗褖械胁褉械屑械薪薪芯 褋械 斜芯褉懈 褋褗褋 蟹谢芯褍锌芯褌褉械斜懈褌械 胁 褋懈褋褌械屑邪褌邪. 肖懈蟹懈褔械褋泻懈褌械 褋褗芯褉褗卸械薪懈褟, 褋褗褔械褌邪薪懈 褋褗褋 褋褗胁褉械屑械薪薪懈 褌械褏薪芯谢芯谐懈懈 蟹邪 薪邪斜谢褞写械薪懈械 懈 蟹邪褋懈谢械薪芯 褋褗褌褉褍写薪懈褔械褋褌胁芯 屑械卸写褍 写褗褉卸邪胁懈褌械 褔谢械薪泻懈, 芯褋懈谐褍褉褟胁邪褌 褑褟谢芯褋褌械薪 懈 械褎械泻褌懈胁械薪 锌芯写褏芯写 蟹邪 褍锌褉邪胁谢械薪懈械 薪邪 谐褉邪薪懈褑懈褌械.

袨褋胁械薪 褌芯胁邪 褎懈薪邪薪褋懈褉邪薪械褌芯 薪邪 褌械蟹懈 锌褉芯械泻褌懈 芯褌 袝小 写械屑芯薪褋褌褉懈褉邪 褋芯谢懈写邪褉薪芯褋褌 褋 写褗褉卸邪胁懈褌械 薪邪 锌褗褉胁邪 谢懈薪懈褟, 泻邪褌芯 袘褗谢谐邪褉懈褟, 芯褋懈谐褍褉褟胁邪泄泻懈 懈屑 薪械芯斜褏芯写懈屑懈褌械 褉械褋褍褉褋懈 蟹邪 蟹邪褖懈褌邪 薪邪 芯斜褖懈褌械 械胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻懈 谐褉邪薪懈褑懈. 袨褋褌邪胁邪屑械 邪薪谐邪卸懈褉邪薪懈 褋 褌胁褗褉写邪, 薪芯 褋锌褉邪胁械写谢懈胁邪 屑懈谐褉邪褑懈芯薪薪邪 锌芯谢懈褌懈泻邪, 芯褋薪芯胁邪薪邪 薪邪 褋懈谐褍褉薪芯褋褌褌邪, 胁褗褉褏芯胁械薪褋褌胁芯褌芯 薪邪 蟹邪泻芯薪邪 懈 蟹邪褖懈褌邪褌邪 薪邪 械胁褉芯锌械泄褋泻懈褌械 褑械薪薪芯褋褌懈.

听听笔谤颈别办拧蝉脓诲脓迟腻箩蝉. 鈥� N膩kamais darba k膩rt墨bas punkts bija paredz膿ts balsojumu skaidrojumi, bet t膩 k膩 neviens balsojuma skaidrojums nav sa艈emts, tad p膩reju pie 拧墨s s膿des nobeiguma.

听听笔谤颈别办拧蝉脓诲脓迟腻箩蝉. 鈥� 艩墨s s膿des protokols tiks iesniegts Parlamentam apstiprin膩拧anai n膩kam膩s s膿des s膩kum膩.

Ja nav iebildumu, 拧odienas s膿d膿 pie艈emt膩s rezol奴cijas nos奴t墨拧u taj膩s nor膩d墨taj膩m person膩m un strukt奴r膩m.

听听笔谤颈别办拧蝉脓诲脓迟腻箩蝉. 鈥� N膩kam膩 sesija notiks 2025. gada 29. janv膩r墨 Brisel膿.

(S膿de tika sl膿gta plkst. 15:41.)

听听笔谤颈别办拧蝉脓诲脓迟腻箩蝉. 鈥� Eiropas Parlamenta sesiju pasludinu par p膩rtrauktu.