Ϸվ

Multiannual financial framework

There have been six multiannual financial frameworks (MFFs) to date, including2021-2027. TheTreaty of Lisbon transformed the MFF from an interinstitutional agreement into a regulation. Established for a period of at least five years, an MFF is there to ensure that the EU’s expenditure develops in an orderly manner and within the limits of its own resources. It sets out provisions with which the annual budget of the EU must comply. The MFF Regulation sets expenditure ceilings for broad categories of spending called headings. After its initial proposals of 2Ѳ2018 and in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak, on 27Ѳ2020 the Commission proposed a recovery plan (NextGenerationEU) that included revised proposals for the MFF2021-2027 and own resources, and the setting up of a recovery instrument worth EUR750billion (in 2018 prices). The package was adopted on 16December2020 following interinstitutional negotiations. In the light of new developments, the MFF was revised in December2022 and then again more substantially in February2024.

Legal basis

  • Article312 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU);
  • of 17December2020 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years2021-2027;
  • of 14December2020 establishing a European Union Recovery Instrument to support the recovery in the aftermath of the COVID-19 crisis;
  • between the European Ϸվ, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management, as well as on new own resources, including a roadmap towards the introduction of new own resources.

Background

In the1980s, a climate of conflict in relations between the institutions arose out of a growing mismatch between available resources and actual budgetary requirements. The concept of a multiannual financial perspective was developed as an attempt to lessen conflict, enhance budgetary discipline and improve implementation through better planning. The first interinstitutional agreement (IIA) to this end was concluded in1988. It contained the financial perspective for1988-1992 (also known as the DelorsI package), which aimed to provide the resources needed for the budgetary implementation of the Single European Act. A new IIA was agreed on 29October1993, together with the financial perspective for1993-1999 (the DelorsII package), which enabled the Structural Funds to be doubled and the own resources (1.4.1) ceiling to be increased. The third IIA, on the financial perspective for2000-2006, also known as Agenda2000, was signed on 6May1999, and one of its main goals was to secure the necessary resources to finance enlargement. The fourth IIA, covering the period2007-2013, was agreed on 17May2006.

The Treaty of Lisbon transformed the MFF from an interinstitutional agreement into a Council regulation to be adopted unanimously, subject to the consent of the European Ϸվ, under a special legislative procedure. In addition to determining the ‘amounts of the annual ceilings on commitment appropriations by category of expenditure and of the annual ceiling on payment appropriations’, Article312 TFEU states that the MFF must also ‘lay down any other provisions required for the annual budgetary procedure to run smoothly’.

The fifth MFF, covering the period2014-2020, was the first to see a real-term decrease in overall amounts. One of Ϸվ’s preconditions for accepting it was therefore a mandatory mid-term revision allowing for a reassessment and adjustment of budgetary needs during the MFF period, if necessary. The agreement also secured, inter alia, enhanced flexibility to enable full use of the amounts planned and an understanding on the way towards a true system of own resources for the EU. A revised MFF for2014-2020 was adopted on 20June2017 with additional support for migration-related measures, jobs and growth. The Flexibility Instrument and the Emergency Aid Reserve were also reinforced, allowing for further funds to be shifted between budget headings and years, in order to be able to react to unforeseen events and new priorities.

The2021-2027 multiannual financial framework

On , the Commission presented legislative proposals for an MFF covering the years2021 to2027. The Commission’s proposal amounted to EUR1134.6billion (2018prices) in commitment appropriations, representing1.11% of the EU-27’s gross national income (GNI). It included increases for border management, migration, security, defence, development cooperation and research. Cuts were proposed in particular for cohesion and agricultural policy. The overall architecture was to be streamlined (from58 to37 expenditure programmes) and the Commission proposed a set of special instruments outside the MFF ceilings to improve flexibility in EU budgeting. The European Development Fund (EDF) would be integrated into the MFF. The Commission also proposed modernising the revenue side, with the introduction of several new categories of own resources.

Ϸվ adopted resolutions on the MFF for2021-2027 on and . On , Ϸվ further outlined its negotiating mandate, including amendments to the MFF Regulation and IIA proposals and a complete set of figures with a breakdown by heading and by programme. It specified that the MFF ceiling for commitments should increase from1.0% (for the EU-28) to1.3% of EU GNI (for the EU-27), i.e. EUR1324billion (2018prices), an increase of16.7% on the Commission proposal. Allocations for the common agricultural policy and cohesion policy should remain unchanged in real terms, while several priorities should be further reinforced, including Horizon Europe, Erasmus+ and LIFE; a new Child Guarantee (EUR5.9billion) and a new Energy Transition Fund (EUR4.8billion) should be created; financing for decentralised agencies involved in migration and border management should increase more than fourfold (to more than EUR12billion). The EU budget’s contribution to the achievement of climate objectives should be set at a minimum of25% of MFF expenditure for2021-2027, be mainstreamed across relevant policy areas, and rise to30% no later than2027. Mid-term revision of the MFF should be mandatory.

and , the Council published a draft ‘negotiating box’, also comprising horizontal and sectoral issues that were normally in the remit of expenditure programmes subject to the ordinary legislative procedure (which was criticised by Ϸվ, for example, in paragraphs 14 to 16 of its resolution of 10ٴDz2019). The Council was in favour of an overall MFF amount of EUR1087billion in commitment appropriations, in2018 prices (1.07%of the EU-27 GNI), well below Ϸվ’s expectations.

and ,Ϸվ updated its mandate following the European elections and requested that the Commission submit a proposal for an MFF contingency plan to provide a safety net to protect the beneficiaries of EU programmes in the event that the ongoing MFF needed to be extended, given the disagreement within the European Council.

Meanwhile, on ,the Commission put forward a proposal for a Just Transition Fund as an additional element in the package of MFF proposals, as part of the European Green Deal.

Following the COVID-19 crisis and the serious economic effects of the necessary lockdowns, the Commission published amended proposals on for an MFF of EUR1100billion and on for an additional recovery instrument, NextGenerationEU (NGEU), worth EUR750billion (in 2018prices), with EUR500billion in the form of grants and EUR250billion as loans. The package involved legislative proposals for new financial instruments as well as changes to MFF programmes already on the table. The financing of the additional package was to be secured by borrowing on the financial markets. For this purpose, the Commission also modified the proposal for an Own Resources Decision to enable the borrowing of up to EUR750billion. Finally, the Commission package included a EUR11.5billion increase in the MFF2014-2020 commitments ceiling for the year2020, in order to begin mobilising support before the new MFF.

On , the European Council adopted conclusions on the recovery effort (NextGenerationEU), the2021-2027 MFF and own resources. The recovery effort was endorsed at EUR750billion for the years2021-2023. However, the grant component was reduced from EUR500 to 390billion and the loan component was increased from EUR250 to360billion. The European Council rejected the upward revision of the MFF ceiling for the year2020. The overall ceiling for commitments in the2021-2027 MFF was set at EUR1074.3billion. Furthermore, the conclusions stated that a regime of conditionality to protect the budget and NGEU from breaches of the rule of law would be introduced. A new own resource was agreed from 1January2021 based on non-recycled plastic packaging waste. Work towards the introduction of other own resources over the course of the2021-2027 MFF was planned, to be used for early repayment of borrowing under NGEU. The proposed legal basis of NGEU was Article122 TFEU, which allows the EU to establish measures appropriate to the economic situation with a qualified majority in the Council, without involving Ϸվ in the legislative procedure.

Ϸվ immediately reacted to these conclusions in a resolution adopted on , in which it called the creation of the recovery instrument a historic move, but deplored the cuts made to future-oriented programmes. It insisted on targeted increases on top of the figures proposed by the European Council and reiterated that it would not give its consent to the MFF without an agreement on the reform of the EU’s own resources system, with the aim of covering at least the costs related to NGEU (principal and interest), so as to ensure its credibility and sustainability. Ϸվ also demanded to be fully involved as budgetary authority in the recovery instrument, in line with the Community method.

Trilateral talks involving Ϸվ, the Council and the Commission started in August2020 and were concluded on 10November2020. The Council Regulation on the MFF2021-2027 was adopted on 17December2020, following Ϸվ’s consent. A new , which was another prerequisite for Ϸվ’s consent, entered into force on 1January2021.All 27Member States ratified the Own Resources Decision by 31May2021, enabling the EU to begin issuing debt on the capital markets under NGEU.

Multiannual financial framework (EU-27) (EUR million, 2018 prices)

Commitment appropriations 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total 2021-2027
1.Single market, innovation and digital 19712 19666 19133 18633 18518 18646 18473 132781
2.Cohesion, resilience and values 49741 51101 52194 53954 55182 56787 58809 377768
2a.Economic, social and territorial cohesion 45411 45951 46493 47130 47770 48414 49066 330235
2b.Resilience and values 4330 5150 5701 6824 7412 8373 9743 47533
3.Natural resources and environment 55242 52214 51489 50617 49719 48932 48161 356374
of which: market-related expenditure and direct payments 38564 38115 37604 36983 36373 35772 35183 258594
4.Migration and border management 2324 2811 3164 3282 3672 3682 3736 22671
5.Security and defence 1700 1725 1737 1754 1928 2078 2263 13185
6.Neighbourhood and the world 15309 15522 14789 14056 13323 12592 12828 98419
7.European public administration 10021 10215 10342 10454 10554 10673 10843 73102
of which: administrative expenditure of the institutions 7742 7878 7945 7997 8025 8077 8188 55852
TOTAL COMMITMENT APPROPRIATIONS 154049 153254 152848 152750 152896 153390 155113 1074300
TOTAL PAYMENT APPROPRIATIONS 156557 154822 149936 149936 149936 149936 149936 1061058

Ϸվ was able to secure, in particular:

  • EUR15billion extra compared to the July2020 proposal, going to flagship programmes: Horizon Europe, Erasmus+, EU4Health, InvestEU, the Border Management and Visa Instrument, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex), the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument – Global Europe (NDICI-Global Europe), Humanitarian Aid, Rights and Values, and Creative Europe;
  • a legally binding roadmap for the introduction of new EU own resources;
  • a progressive increase of the overall ceiling for the2021-2027 MFF from EUR1074.3 to EUR1085.3billion in2018 prices (explained below);
  • a further EUR1 billion for the Flexibility Instrument;
  • a new procedural step (the ‘budgetary scrutiny procedure’) for the setting up of future crisis mechanisms based on Article122 TFEU, with potential appreciable budgetary implications;
  • Ϸվ’s involvement in the use of NGEU external assigned revenue (EAR), a general reassessment of EAR and borrowing and lending in the next revision of the Financial Regulation, and of arrangements for cooperation in future MFF negotiations;
  • an enhanced climate tracking methodology to reach the target of at least30% of MFF/NGEU expenditure to support climate objectives[1];
  • a new annual biodiversity target (7.5% in2024 and10% in2026 and2027) and the design of a methodology to measure gender expenditure;
  • a reform of the collection, quality and comparability of data on beneficiaries in order to better protect the EU budget, including NGEU expenditure.

Other components of the MFF2021-2027 corresponding to Ϸվ’s priorities include:

  • integration of the EDF into the EU budget;
  • overall levels of funding for agriculture and cohesion of a size comparable to2014-2020;
  • creation of the Just Transition Fund.

The additional EUR15billion includes a EUR11billion progressive increase, the main source of which is a new mechanism linked to fines collected by the EU, resulting in automatic additional allocations to the programmes concerned in2022-2027. The overall ceiling of the seven-year MFF will therefore incrementally reach EUR1085.3billion in2018 prices, i.e. EUR2billion higher in real terms than the equivalent2014-2020 MFF ceiling (EUR1083.3billion in2018 prices, without the UK, with the EDF). Complementary sources include: margins left unallocated within the ceilings set by the European Council (EUR2.5billion); reflows from the ACP Investment Facility (EDF), to the benefit of NDICI-Global Europe (EUR1billion); and decommitted appropriations in the area of research, to the benefit of Horizon Europe (EUR0.5billion)[2].

Under the IIA, it was agreed in 2020 that repayments and interests of recovery debt would be financed by the EU budget under the MFF ceilings for the2021-2027 period, ‘including by sufficient proceeds from new own resources introduced after2021’, without prejudice to how this matter will be addressed in future MFFs from2028 onwards. The express aim was to preserve EU programmes and funds. On 22December2021, the Commission proposed new own resources and a targeted amendment of the MFF Regulation (subsequently withdrawn) aimed at, inter alia, introducing a new mechanism that would allow ceilings to automatically increase from2025 in order to accommodate any additional revenue yielded by new own resources for the early repayment of NGEU debt. Ϸվ adopted an interim resolution concerning this amendment on .

The Commission stated that it would present a review of the functioning of the MFF by 1January2024, and, as appropriate, proposals for a revision. In its , it recognised that the ‘unforeseen needs created by war in Europe are well beyond the means available in the current multiannual financial framework’. On , Ϸվ thus requested ‘a legislative proposal for a comprehensive MFF revision as soon as possible and no later than the first quarter of2023’.

As a first step, amended the MFF in December2022 as part of a package adopted by Ϸվ under an urgent procedure on . It extended the budgetary coverage, thus far applicable to the loans to the Member States, to macro-financial assistance loans to Ukraine, for the years2023 and2024: in case of default, the necessary amounts would be mobilised from the ‘headroom’, above the MFF ceilings, up to the limits of the own resources ceiling.

To set the agenda for a far more comprehensive revision, on 15December2022 Ϸվ adopted a resolution on ‘’, setting out its key demands.

On 20June2023, the Commission proposed a covering most of these demands (six months before its review had initially been planned):

  • a reserve of EUR50billion to deal with the war in Ukraine and its humanitarian, economic and budgetary consequences (grants, loans and guarantees);
  • additional funding for migration, global challenges and natural disasters – with the ceilings of Headings 4 and 6 to be increased by EUR2billion and EUR10.5billion respectively, and the Solidarity and Emergency Aid Reserve to be increased by EUR2.5billion;
  • a new European Union Recovery Instrument (EURI) over and above the MFF ceilings, in order to address the problem linked to the repayment of EURI debt in a context of steep acceleration of inflation and interest rates;
  • a Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform (STEP) to increase Europe’s strategic autonomy following global supply chain disruptions – with the ceilings of Headings 1, 3 and 5 to be increased by EUR3.5billion, EUR5billion and EUR1.5billion respectively, and research decommitments to be further used in Heading 1;
  • an increase of EUR3billion in funding for the Flexibility Instrument to create more budgetary space for reacting to unforeseen circumstances;
  • additional funding for administration (EUR1.9billion), raising the ceiling of Heading 7 accordingly.

On 3October2023, Ϸվ adopted its stressing that the revised MFF must be in place by 1January2024. However, the European Council of 15December2023 ended in deadlock.

Once a political agreement was finally found, the was published on 29February2024. It includes cuts to Horizon Europe (only partly offset by reusing the last MFF research decommitments), EU4Health (mitigated by the MFF Article 5 mechanism) and the direct management of the common agricultural policy and cohesion policy, as well as limited fresh money for STEP.

However, this is the first time that a mid-term MFF review has led to a net increase in spending ceilings. The main positive outcomes include: EUR50billion for Ukraine for 2024-2027, increased funding for migration and external action and for the European Defence Fund (under STEP), an increase in funding for the special instruments (Flexibility Instrument and EU Solidarity Reserve for reconstruction after extreme weather events and natural disasters, now separate from the Emergency Aid Reserve for emergency assistance to non-EU countries), and the establishment of an uncapped EURI special instrument protecting programmes from significant cuts. Some of the costs of EU joint borrowing are to be covered in the annual budgetary procedure (the European Council set a non-binding benchmark of 50%). In order to use the EURI special instrument for these purposes, roughly half of the costs must be covered by special instruments or redeployments from programmes. The latter operates in two steps: the first is the mobilisation of resources equivalent to the amount of decommitted funds and the second is a ‘last resort’ mechanism of additional national contributions.

Further details can be found in the .

For more information on this topic, please see the website of the Committee on Budgets.

[1]On 21June2022, the Commission published its approach to climate mainstreaming in the2021-2027 MFF and the NGEU in a .
[2]Article 15(3) of the Financial Regulation.

Alix Delasnerie