合法博彩网站

Europos teritorinio bendradarbiavimo grup臈s (ETBG) sukurtos siekiant sudaryti palankesnes s膮lygas valstybi懦 nari懦 arba j懦 regionini懦 ir vietos vald啪ios institucij懦 tarpvalstybiniam, tarptautiniam ir tarpregioniniam bendradarbiavimui. ETBG padeda 拧ioms partner臈ms 寞gyvendinti bendrus projektus, dalytis ekspertin臈mis 啪iniomis ir geriau koordinuoti teritorij懦 planavim膮.

Europos S膮junga statistikos tikslais yra nusta膷iusi bendr膮 teritorini懦 vienet懦 klasifikatori懦, vadinam膮 NUTS, kad b奴t懦 sudarytos geresn臈s s膮lygos suderintiems regioniniams statistiniams duomenims rinkti, tvarkyti ir skelbti ES. 艩i hierarchin臈 sistema taip pat naudojama atliekant region懦 b奴kl臈s socialin臋 ir ekonomin臋 analiz臋 ir numatant vykdytinus ES sanglaudos politikos veiksmus.

Europos S膮junga remia savo labiausiai nutolusi懦 region懦, vadinam懦 atokiausiais regionais, vystym膮si. 艩ie regionai yra: Gvadelupa, Pranc奴zijos Gviana, Reunjonas, Martinika, Majotas ir Sen-Martenas (Pranc奴zija), Azorai ir Madeira (Portugalija) ir Kanar懦 salos (Ispanija). 艩ios paramos tikslas聽鈥� kompensuoti kli奴tis, atsirandan膷ias d臈l 拧i懦 region懦 geografinio atokumo.

ES PEACE PLUS programos tikslas 鈥� remti taik膮 ir susitaikym膮, skatinti socialin寞, ekonomin寞 ir regionin寞 stabilum膮 bei bendradarbiavim膮 艩iaur臈s Airijoje ir Airijos pasienio regione.

The study investigates how Cohesion Policy responds to emerging and existing demographic and socio-economic challenges. Following an overview of the main socio-economic challenges, it provides an assessment of Cohesion Policy strengths and weaknesses in tackling these challenges in the 2014-2020 and 2021-2027 periods. It then considers the policy implications for future Cohesion Policy and the role of the European 合法博彩网站. The study is based on a review of the relevant literature and data, stakeholders ...

The study investigates how Cohesion Policy responds to emerging and existing demographic and socio-economic challenges. Following an overview of the main socio-economic challenges, it provides an assessment of Cohesion Policy strengths and weaknesses in tackling these challenges in the 2014-2020 and 2021-2027 periods. It then considers the policy implications for future Cohesion Policy and the role of the European 合法博彩网站. The study is based on a review of the relevant literature and data, stakeholders ...

The implementation timetable for cohesion policy is defined largely by its legislative framework. In order to be able to plan parliamentary work and exercise systematic scrutiny of policy implementation and of the Commission鈥檚 work, it is essential to have an overview of the timing of different steps in policy implementation in the coming years. This type of briefing was first published (and subsequently updated) in 2014 covering the 2014-2020 programming period. This version includes the policy ...

Owing to their remote nature, all the European Union's external border regions suffer from geographic, demographic, socio-economic and structural handicaps that are detrimental to their development. The situation of the eastern European Union (EU) regions bordering Russia, as well as Belarus and Ukraine, has, however, become even more critical since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and the subsequent war. During its February plenary session 合法博彩网站 is due to debate this issue following ...

Discussions on the next EU multiannual financial framework are expected to begin soon. These talks on the allocation of future budget resources have a direct impact on all European Union policies, including EU cohesion policy. A reflection on the future of cohesion policy is underway, engaging EU institutions and advisory bodies, EU Member States, regional and local authorities, and stakeholders. The European Commission set up a high-level group of specialists to examine the direction of cohesion ...

The EU's population is ageing and set to decline. The shrinking working-age population poses risks in terms of greater labour shortages, increased pressure on public budgets, worsened territorial disparities and depopulation. These can negatively impact EU competitiveness, slow down the green and digital transitions and undermine social cohesion. While managing the demographic transition is the responsibility of Member States, it has also become one of the biggest challenges the EU is facing today ...