REPORTon the request for waiver of the immunity of Mariusz Kamiński
20.3.2025-()
Committee on Legal Affairs
Rapporteur: Mario Furore
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION
on the request for waiver of the immunity of Mariusz Kamiński
()
Ϸվ,
–having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Mariusz Kamiński, dated 29July2024, by the Prosecutor General of the Republic of Poland, transmitting a request submitted by the Regional Prosecutor’s Office in Warsaw, in connection with criminal proceedings brought against Mariusz Kamiński and announced in plenary on 16September2024,
–having heard Mariusz Kamiński on 30January2025 in accordance with Rule9(6) of its Rules of Procedure and having regard to the document submitted by him,
–having regard to Articles8 and 9 of Protocol No7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, and Article6(2) of the Act of 20September1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Ϸվ by direct universal suffrage,
–having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21October2008, 19March2010, 6September2011, 17January2013, 19December2019 and 5July2023[1],
–having regard to Article105(2) and (5) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland,
–having regard to Rule5(2), Rule6(1) and Rule9 of its Rules of Procedure,
–having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A10-0032/2025),
A.whereas by letter dated 29July2024 the Prosecutor General of Poland transmitted a request for waiver of the immunity of Mariusz Kamiński, made by the Regional Prosecutor’s Office in Warsaw, in relation to alleged offences under Article244 of the Polish Criminal Code in conjunction with Article12 of that Code;
B.whereas the request indicates that the actions Mariusz Kamiński is alleged to have engaged in on 21 and 28December2023 in Warsaw, with premeditated intent and at short intervals, violated the five-year ban on holding a public position which had been imposed in a final and binding judgment handed down on 20December2023 by the Regional Court in Warsaw, insofar as Mariusz Kamiński performed the duties of a Member of the Sejm (the lower house of the Polish Ϸվ) of the Republic of Poland by participating in the session of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland held on 21December2023, which included taking part in votes, and taking part in a meeting held by the Sejm’s Administration and Internal Affairs Committee on 28December2023; whereas the alleged actions constitute an offence under Article244 of the Polish Criminal Code in conjunction with Article12 of that Code;
C.whereas the above charges were brought against Mariusz Kamiński on 18April2024; whereas Mariusz Kamiński was elected to the European Ϸվ in the European elections in June2024;
D.whereas Mariusz Kamiński was not a Member of the European Ϸվ at the time of the alleged offence;
E.whereas the alleged offence and the subsequent request for waiver of his immunity are not related to an opinion expressed or a vote cast by Mariusz Kamiński in the performance of his duties within the meaning of Article8 of ProtocolNo7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union;
F.whereas Article9, first paragraph, point (a), of ProtocolNo7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union provides that Members of the European Ϸվ enjoy, in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament;
G.whereas in accordance with Article105(2) and (5) of the Polish Constitution, from the day of the announcement of the results of the elections until the day of the expiry of his or her mandate, a Deputy shall not be subjected to criminal accountability without the consent of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland and he or she shall be neither detained nor arrested without the consent of the Sejm, except for cases when he or she has been apprehended in the commission of an offence and in which his or her detention is necessary for securing the proper course of proceedings;
H.whereas the purpose of parliamentary immunity is to protect Ϸվ and its Members from legal proceedings in relation to activities carried out in the performance of parliamentary duties and which cannot be separated from those duties;
I.whereas, in accordance with Rule5(2) of its Rules of Procedure, parliamentary immunity is not a personal privilege of the Member but a guarantee of the independence of Ϸվ as a whole, and of its Members;
J.whereas, in this case, Ϸվ found no evidence of fumus persecutionis, which is to say factual elements indicating that the intention underlying the legal proceedings in question is to undermine the Member’s political activity in his capacity as a Member of the European Ϸվ;
K.whereas Ϸվ cannot assume the role of a court, and whereas, in a waiver of immunity procedure, a Member cannot be regarded as a defendant[2];
1.Decides to waive the immunity of Mariusz Kamiński;
2.Instructs its President to forward this decision and the report of its committee responsible immediately to the competent authorities of the Republic of Poland and to Mariusz Kamiński.
ANNEX: ENTITIES OR PERSONSFROM WHOM THE RAPPORTEUR HAS RECEIVED INPUT
The rapporteur declares under his exclusive responsibility that he did not receive input from any entity or person to be mentioned in this Annex pursuant to Article8 of AnnexI to the Rules of Procedure.
INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
Date adopted |
18.3.2025 |
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
16 6 0 |
||
Members present for the final vote |
Maravillas Abadía Jover, Tobiasz Bocheński, Ton Diepeveen, Mario Furore, Mary Khan, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Sergey Lagodinsky, Mario Mantovani, Pascale Piera, René Repasi, Krzysztof Śmiszek, Dominik Tarczyński, Adrián Vázquez Lázara, Axel Voss, Marion Walsmann, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Dainius Žalimas |
|||
Substitutes present for the final vote |
David Cormand, Billy Kelleher, Arash Saeidi, Ernő Schaller-Baross, Kosma Złotowski |
|||
Members under Rule 216(7) present for the final vote |
Nacho Sánchez Amor, Angelika Winzig |
-
[1] Judgment of the Court of Justice of 21October2008, Marra v De Gregorio and Clemente, C 200/07 and C-201/07, ECLI:EU:C:2008:579; judgment of the General Court of 19March2010, Gollnisch v Ϸվ, T-42/06, ECLI:EU:T:2010:102; judgment of the Court of Justice of 6September2011, Patriciello, C 163/10, ECLI: EU:C:2011:543; judgment of the General Court of 17January2013, Gollnisch v Ϸվ, T-346/11 and T-347/11, ECLI:EU:T:2013:23; judgment of the Court of Justice of 19December2019, Junqueras Vies, C-502/19, ECLI:EU:C:2019:1115; judgment of the General Court of 5July2023, Puigdemont i Casamajó and Others v Ϸվ, T-272/21, ECLI:EU:T:2023:373.
- [2] Judgment of the General Court of 30April2019, Briois v Ϸվ, T-214/18, ECLI:EU:T:2019:266.